5. The public sphere is "a
sphere of encounters and
conflicts between the two
"Domination works through
the distinction of the public,
which belongs to everyone,
CARL "The specific political distinction to
which political actions and motives
can be reduced is that between
SHMITT
opposed logics of police and
politics, of the natural and the private, where the friend and enemy. [...]"
government of social liberties of all prevail."
competences and the
government of anyone and "The political enemy need not be
everyone (.......) It entails "Democracy is morally evil or aesthetically ugly; he
as bare in its need not appear as an economic
struggling against the
relation to the competitor, and it may even be
distribution of the public
advantageous to engage with him in
and the private that shores power of wealth
business transactions. But he is,
up the twofold domination as it is to the nevertheless, the other, the stranger;
of the oligarchy in the State power of and it is sufficient for his nature that
and in society." kinship that he is, in a specially intense way,
today comes to existentially something different and
assist and to
JACQUES rival it."
alien, so that in the extreme case
conflicts with him are possible."
RANCIÉRE
Jacques Rancière Carl Schmitt
"An institutionalist discourse is one that
"The rationalist longing for an
"The rationalist longing for an
attempts to make the limits of the
undistorted rational communication
undistorted rational communication
discursive formation coincide with the
and for a soical unity basedfor a soical unity based on rational
and on rational
consensus is profoundly antipolitical limits of the community". [...] The opposite
consensus is profoundly antipolitical
because it ignores the crucial place of takes place in the case of populism: a
because it ignores the crucial place of
passions and affects in passions and affects in politics."
politics." frontier of exclusion divides society in two
camps. The 'people', in that case, is
something less than the totality of the
"Rawls explains that 'a liberal view
hat 'a liberal view
political agendafrom the political agenda the
removes the CHANTAL members of the community: it is a partial
component which nevertheless aspires to
ues.' What is devisive issues.' What is this, if
most this, if
f a frontier the drawing of a frontier between
not
between
what is negotiable in a liberal society
MOUFFE be conceived as the only legitimate
totality."
e in a liberal society
and what is not negotiable? What is
egotiable? What is
this, if not a decision that establishes a
ion that establishes a
distinction between the private and
en the private spheres?"
ERNESTO
public and
LACLAU
6. The public sphere is "a
sphere of encounters and "Domination works through
conflicts between the two the distinction of the public,
opposed logics of police and which belongs to everyone,
politics, of the natural and the private, where the
government of social liberties of all prevail."
competences and the
government of anyone and
everyone (.......) It entails "Democracy is
struggling against the as bare in its
distribution of the public relation to the
and the private that shores power of wealth
up the twofold domination as it is to the
of the oligarchy in the State power of
and in society." kinship that
today comes to
assist and to
JACQUES rival it."
RANCIÉRE
Jacques Rancière
7. "The rationalist longing for an
"The rationalist longing for an
undistorted rational communication
undistorted rational communicat
and for a soical unity basedfor a soical unity based on ra
and on rational
consensus is profoundly antipolit
consensus is profoundly antipolitical
because it ignores the crucial pla
because it ignores the crucial place of
passions and affects in passions and affects in politics."
politics."
"Rawls explains that 'a liberal view
'a liberal view
itical agendafrom the political agenda the
removes the CHANTAL
' What is devisive issues.' What is this, if
most this, if
frontier the drawing of a frontier between
not
between
MOUFFE
what is negotiable in a liberal society
a liberal society
and what is not negotiable? What is
tiable? What is
this, if not a decision that establishes a
that establishes a
distinction between the private and
he private spheres?"
public and
8. CARL "The specific political distinction to
which political actions and motives
can be reduced is that between
SHMITT friend and enemy. [...]"
"The political enemy need not be
morally evil or aesthetically ugly; he
need not appear as an economic
competitor, and it may even be
advantageous to engage with him in
business transactions. But he is,
nevertheless, the other, the stranger;
and it is sufficient for his nature that
he is, in a specially intense way,
existentially something different and
alien, so that in the extreme case
conflicts with him are possible."
9. "An institutionalist discourse is one that
attempts to make the limits of the
discursive formation coincide with the
limits of the community". [...] The opposite
takes place in the case of populism: a
frontier of exclusion divides society in two
camps. The 'people', in that case, is
something less than the totality of the
members of the community: it is a partial
component which nevertheless aspires to
be conceived as the only legitimate
totality."
ERNESTO
LACLAU
