SOHINI
Periodontic-Orthodontic
Interrelationship
1. Introduction
2. Factors affecting Perio - Ortho Outcomes
3. Biological and biomechanical considerations for ortho treatment
4. Benefits of orthodontics in periodontal health
5. Clinical response to various orthodontic movements
6. Periodontal surgeries associated with orthodontic correction
7. Perioesthetics
8. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics [PAOO]
9. Sequence of periodontal/orthodontic treatment
10. Conclusion
 Often periodontal health is improved by orthodontic
tooth movement, whereas orthodontic tooth movement
is often facilitated by periodontal therapy.
 Co-operation, coordination, and interaction between
different specialties in dentistry are extremely important
in establishing diagnosis and an effective treatment
planning.
 Reducing plaque retention
 Crowded teeth
 Tipped teeth
 Malposed teeth
 Teeth in linguoversion
 Vertical tooth positioning improves certain types of osseous defects.
 Facilitating prosthetic replacements
 Improving esthetics – allows open gingival embrasures…regain lost
papilla
Implant
placement
Benefits of orthodontics for a periodontally compromised patient
Factors affecting Perio - Ortho
Outcomes
Some factors have to be evaluated to prevent negative
periodontal sequelae during orthodontic treatment.
GENERAL FACTORS:
 Family history of premature tooth loss (indication of
immune system deficiency)
 Systemic history (e.g. diabetes)
 Nutritional status
 Stress
LOCAL FACTORS:
 Tooth alignment (e.g. marginal ridge, cementoenamel
junction relationship)
 Plaque indices, oral hygiene maintenance
 Occlusal loading, TFO
 Periodontal biotype
 Crown-to-root ratio
 Grinding, clenching habits (parafunctional activity)
 Restorative status
Biological and biomechanical
considerations for orthodontic
treatment
 Apical displacement of the center of resistance in
teeth with marginal bone loss (Melsen, 1980) results
in greater moments created at force application.
 It is important to understand that the loss of alveolar
bone results in the center of resistance, of involved teeth,
moving apically with the net effect being that the teeth
are more prone to tipping instead of bodily movement
[Williams et al, 1982].
COMPROMISED PERIODONTIUM
ROLE OF OCCLUSAL TRAUMA
 In healthy but reduced periodontium, normal occlusal
forces may become traumatic (Bernal et al., 2002).
 Traumatic occlusal forces worsen an active
periodontal defect and lead to loss of attachment and
bone (Ericsson and Thilander, 1978).
The basic principles used in the treatment of patients
with reduced bone support
• Lighter forces
 Longer time intervals between reactivation
 Increasing number of teeth in the anchorage unit
 Simple mechanics --- Segmental arch mechanics
(Melsen, 1991; Proffit,
1993)
Use of implants as anchorage (Ong & Wang, 2002).
Oral hygiene, control of infection, periodic recalls
(Zachrisson, 1996).
Space may be created by extracting single tooth
rather than routine premolar extraction.
Clinical response to various
orthodontic movements
• Orthodontic correction of
malposed teeth creates gingival
contours that are more
conducive to periodontal
health.
Alignment of malposed teeth
Case : Alignment of crowding resulting healthy periodontal status
Extrusion
Least hazardous type of movement to
solve osseous morphology defects.
Result :
In areas of one- and two-wall bony
pockets coronal (favorable) positioning of
intact connective tissue attachment
reduction in pocket depth
shallowing of the bony defect
(van Venroy and Yukna, 1985)
Forced Eruption
Slow Fast
Bone and gingiva follows tooth
Crown lengthening before final
restoration
Bone temporarily left
behind
Criteria to determine forced extrusion of teeth:
1. Root length & Root form : a short root or an unusual
root shape 
2. Level of fracture :
3. Esthetics (peri-implant)
4. Periodontal-endodontic prognosis
 Conflicting evidence has been
reported regarding the benefits of
intrusion of individual teeth.
 It requires careful control of force
magnitude.
 Light force is advocated because the
force is concentrated in a small area at
the tooth apex.
Intrusion
 Ericson et al (1987) have demonstrated in
experimental animals that orthodontic intrusion of
teeth can shift supragingivally located plaque to a
subgingival location, leading to formation of
infrabony pockets and loss of connective tissue
attachment.
• Birte Melsen et al (1989) found that incisor intrusion
through the long axis of the tooth in adult patients with
marginal bone loss had a beneficial effect on the
attachment level, as long as bacterial plaque is properly
controlled all along the course of movement.
 New connective tissue attachment can
also be formed
 Thus, SRP should be done during
active intrusion.
CASE : Intrusion Of Central Incisor
 Experiments in beagle dog demonstrated
that with tipping and intruding movements,
forces were capable of causing a gingival
lesion to be converted to a lesion associated
with attachment loss.
 In tipping movements, the force should be
light and the area kept clean to prevent the
formation of angular bony defects.
Tipping
 It has been suggested that movement into infrabony defects can
result in healing and regeneration of the attachment apparatus.
 Wide osseous defect adjacent to a tooth → the teeth were
moved in order to narrow the defect → better healing potential
may be possible.
Bodily movement into a defect
 Wennstrom et al (1993) evaluated in animal experiments
the effect of orthodontic tooth movement on the level of
the connective tissue attachment in sites with infrabony
pockets.
 Orthodontic therapy involving bodily movement of teeth
with inflamed, infrabony pocket may enhance the rate of
connective tissue loss.
Implants for replacing missing teeth:
Implants remain positionally stable
under orthodontic/orthopedic forces.
They should be stable for 4-6 mnths
before use as orthodontic anchor
[Shapiro & Kokich, 1988].
If implant is not being used for
anchorage, to be placed after the
orthodontic therapy.
Orthodontic implants
 Easy to insert and remove
 Immediate loading
Diameter: 1.2-2.3
Length: 6-14 mm
 The dimension of the alveolar ridge is an important
consideration prior to orthodontics movement.
Alveolar Ridge
Narrow
buccolingually
Fenestration &
dehiscence
Movement into edentulous spaces
•Movement into vertically reduced bone is not a
contraindication for tooth movement [Thilander, 1996].
•When tooth is moved through cortical plate: no bone
formation (Steiner et al, 1981)
•Light forces are applied to move teeth bodily into area with
reduced bone height having cancellous bone,
↓
Recreate a thin bone plate ahead of the moving tooth
[Lindskog-Stokland et al, 1993].
[Lindskog-Stokland et al, 1993]
CASE: Bodily movement of tooth before implant placement
Periodontal surgery associated with
orthodontic therapy
Evaluation of an aberrant frenum:
1.Vestibular depth
2.Width of attached gingiva
3.Tension test
4.Marginal tissue recession
5.Midline diastema (controversial)
Aberrant frenum
 FRENECTOMY: complete removal of the frenum
including it’s attachment to underlying bone.
 FRENOTOMY: incision of the frenum relocating the
frenal attachment so as to create a zone of attached
gingiva between gingival margin and frenum.
CASE : Frenectomy irt 11 21
Gingival Invaginations
 Incomplete adaptation of supporting structures during
orthodontic closure of extraction spaces in adults may
result in infolding or invagination of the gingiva.
Removal of gingival invagination
Edwards, 1971
Perioesthetics
Gummy smile
CAUSES:
1. Vertical maxillary excess
2. Delayed apical migration
of gingival margins
[Kokich,
1996]
3. Over-eruption of the
upper anteriors
GINGIVAL DISPLAY TREATMENT
 Gingivectomy
 Flap surgery with or without ostectomy
 Apical positioning of flap with or without osseous
resection
CASE : Correction of
gummy smile
Gingival margin discrepancy
According to Kokich et al (1996), the relationship of
gingival margin of the six maxillary anterior teeth plays an
important role in esthetic appearance of teeth.
Gingival marginal
discrepancy
Inapparent Apparent
No treatment required
Gingivectomy
Intrusion
and incisal
restoration
Extrusion,
fiberotomy &
incisal edge
equilibration
Surgical
crown
lengthening
If deep sulcus If short CI >LI
If incisal edge
is abraded
Encroachment of
biologic width
CASE : Gingivectomy done for crown lengthening
Orthodontic intrusion to correct gingival
marginal discrepancy & short clinical crown
Orthodontic extrusion
Surgical exposure of unerrupted teeth
Excision of gingival tissue over the embedded tooth is
done to achieve crown exposure.
CASE :
Surgical
exposure of
unerrupted
teeth
Gingival augmentation
Thin gingival biotype prone
to recession
 If thick gingival tissue is present, gingival recession is
less likely to occur.
 In areas of a labially positioned tooth with
dehiscence, bone may re-form and gingival thickness
and keratinized tissue may increase when the tooth is
moved lingually.
[Busschop et al, 1985]
 Other clinical studies (Dorfman 1978, Coatoam et al.
1981) have shown that → a narrow band of gingiva is
capable of withstanding the stress caused by orthodontic
forces.
 Results from an experimental study (Wennstrom et al.
1987) indicate that → as long as the tooth is moved
within the envelope of the alveolar process, the risk of
harmful side effects on the marginal soft tissue is
minimal.
 Many researchers and clinicians agree that thin labial
tissues should be augmented before labial orthodontic
tooth movement is begun.
(Steiner et al. 1981, Foushee et al. 1985, Maynard
1987, Wennstrom et al. 1987).
CASE : Free Gingival Graft irt 31
Rapid maxillary expansion (RME ) and
gingival recession
Graber and Vanarsdall stated that if the maxillary
expansion is performed after the midpalatine suture begins
to fuse (after approximately 14 to 16 years of age), there is
a greater risk of recession of the buccal gingival tissue of
the maxillary premolars and molars later in life.
Fiberotomy
 Two soft-tissue
periodontal entities may
influence the stability:

1.Principal fibers of the
periodontal ligament,
and
2.Supra-alveolar fibers.
Gingival hyperplasia
Gingival
hyperplasia
Reversible
Gingivectomy/
plasty
Interfere with
tooth movement
Usually develops 1-2 months after
ortho appliance is placed
Periodontally accelerated
osteogenic orthodontics
[PAOO]
 Dr. Thomas Wilcko & Dr.William Wilcko → Accelerated
Osteogenic Orthodontics (AOO)
 In May 1998 the AOOTM
procedure was introduced at the
98th
Annual Session of the American Association of
Orthodontics.
 Patented by “Wilckodontics”
Technique
Fixed orthodontic treatment:
Bracket placement, archwire placement
 Incision: Intrasulcular incisions/1mm below marginal
gingiva
 Flap reflection: buccal and lingual full thickness flaps
 Decortication: bone bur No, ½, 2, 4
 Bone grafting: DFDBA alone or combined with bovine-
derived xenograft
 Fixed orthodontic treatment:
Heavy forces (0-18 Ni Ti) 1 week after surgery. More
frequent reactivation (force application every 1-3 weeks)
DECORTICATION
BONE GRAFTING
Treatment time: 7 months, 1week
PRETREATMENT POST TREATMENT
Treatment time: 6mos
Advantages
Reduced treatment time (60-70%)
Decreased tendency for relapse
Decreased root resorption
Improved retention
Prevents re - crowding of lower incisors
Reduced postoperative complications (devitalisation,
ankylosis)
Disadvantages
Risk of morbidity (surgical procedure)
Need for long-term peer-viewed data and more animal
studies
Coordination between orthodontist and surgeon
Sequence of periodontal/
orthodontic treatment
Before orthodontic treatment
 Increasing
keratinized tissue
(Zachrisson, 1996)
 In regenerative procedures, a follow up period of
four to six months, depending on disease severity,
should elapse before placement of fixed appliances.
 During this period the periodontal status is
evaluated and the patients oral hygiene is monitored.
During orthodontic treatment
 All adult patients should have thorough periodontal
maintenance every 3 months [Boyd et al, 1989].
 Soft-tissue periodontal surgery:
Frenectomy/Frenotomy
After orthodontic treatment
Depigme
ntation
Oral hygiene maintenance
Tooth brushing
Super floss
Interdental brushing
Chemical plaque control
CONCLUSION
• Adult orthodontic tooth movement can be performed on
both healthy and diseased periodontia with few
detrimental effects provided physiologic forces are used,
periodontal inflammation is controlled and meticulous oral
hygiene is maintained throughout active therapy.
• By combining the talents of the periodontist and the
orthodontist, we can have an optimal treatment result.
1.Clinical Periodontology – 8th & 9th edition Carranza
2.Clinical Periodontology & Implantology – 3rd & 4th edition
Lindhe
3.Contemporary orthodontic: Profitt
4.Orthodontics & Periodontitis: B.U. Zachission and A.
Baldouf.
5.Evidence based care in orthodontic and Periodontics.
A review of literature: Noran Saunders (JADA, Vol. 130, April
1999)
6.Gingival response to orthodontic force:
Meir Redlier et al (AJODO 1999:116:152-8).
7.Quintessence Int. 1992; 23:509-513.
8.J. Periodontal 2001:72:858-869.
9.Australian Orthodontic journal Vol. 19 Nov.1 April 2003.
10.Eur J. of Orthodon. Vol. 25, No. 6, 579-584, 2003.
Thank you

Periodontics and orthodontics interrelationship

  • 1.
  • 2.
    1. Introduction 2. Factorsaffecting Perio - Ortho Outcomes 3. Biological and biomechanical considerations for ortho treatment 4. Benefits of orthodontics in periodontal health 5. Clinical response to various orthodontic movements 6. Periodontal surgeries associated with orthodontic correction 7. Perioesthetics 8. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics [PAOO] 9. Sequence of periodontal/orthodontic treatment 10. Conclusion
  • 4.
     Often periodontalhealth is improved by orthodontic tooth movement, whereas orthodontic tooth movement is often facilitated by periodontal therapy.  Co-operation, coordination, and interaction between different specialties in dentistry are extremely important in establishing diagnosis and an effective treatment planning.
  • 5.
     Reducing plaqueretention  Crowded teeth  Tipped teeth  Malposed teeth  Teeth in linguoversion  Vertical tooth positioning improves certain types of osseous defects.  Facilitating prosthetic replacements  Improving esthetics – allows open gingival embrasures…regain lost papilla Implant placement Benefits of orthodontics for a periodontally compromised patient
  • 6.
    Factors affecting Perio- Ortho Outcomes
  • 7.
    Some factors haveto be evaluated to prevent negative periodontal sequelae during orthodontic treatment. GENERAL FACTORS:  Family history of premature tooth loss (indication of immune system deficiency)  Systemic history (e.g. diabetes)  Nutritional status  Stress
  • 8.
    LOCAL FACTORS:  Toothalignment (e.g. marginal ridge, cementoenamel junction relationship)  Plaque indices, oral hygiene maintenance  Occlusal loading, TFO  Periodontal biotype  Crown-to-root ratio  Grinding, clenching habits (parafunctional activity)  Restorative status
  • 9.
  • 10.
     Apical displacementof the center of resistance in teeth with marginal bone loss (Melsen, 1980) results in greater moments created at force application.
  • 11.
     It isimportant to understand that the loss of alveolar bone results in the center of resistance, of involved teeth, moving apically with the net effect being that the teeth are more prone to tipping instead of bodily movement [Williams et al, 1982]. COMPROMISED PERIODONTIUM
  • 12.
    ROLE OF OCCLUSALTRAUMA  In healthy but reduced periodontium, normal occlusal forces may become traumatic (Bernal et al., 2002).  Traumatic occlusal forces worsen an active periodontal defect and lead to loss of attachment and bone (Ericsson and Thilander, 1978).
  • 13.
    The basic principlesused in the treatment of patients with reduced bone support • Lighter forces
  • 14.
     Longer timeintervals between reactivation  Increasing number of teeth in the anchorage unit  Simple mechanics --- Segmental arch mechanics (Melsen, 1991; Proffit, 1993)
  • 15.
    Use of implantsas anchorage (Ong & Wang, 2002). Oral hygiene, control of infection, periodic recalls (Zachrisson, 1996). Space may be created by extracting single tooth rather than routine premolar extraction.
  • 16.
    Clinical response tovarious orthodontic movements
  • 17.
    • Orthodontic correctionof malposed teeth creates gingival contours that are more conducive to periodontal health. Alignment of malposed teeth
  • 18.
    Case : Alignmentof crowding resulting healthy periodontal status
  • 19.
    Extrusion Least hazardous typeof movement to solve osseous morphology defects. Result : In areas of one- and two-wall bony pockets coronal (favorable) positioning of intact connective tissue attachment reduction in pocket depth shallowing of the bony defect (van Venroy and Yukna, 1985)
  • 20.
    Forced Eruption Slow Fast Boneand gingiva follows tooth Crown lengthening before final restoration Bone temporarily left behind
  • 21.
    Criteria to determineforced extrusion of teeth: 1. Root length & Root form : a short root or an unusual root shape  2. Level of fracture : 3. Esthetics (peri-implant) 4. Periodontal-endodontic prognosis
  • 22.
     Conflicting evidencehas been reported regarding the benefits of intrusion of individual teeth.  It requires careful control of force magnitude.  Light force is advocated because the force is concentrated in a small area at the tooth apex. Intrusion
  • 23.
     Ericson etal (1987) have demonstrated in experimental animals that orthodontic intrusion of teeth can shift supragingivally located plaque to a subgingival location, leading to formation of infrabony pockets and loss of connective tissue attachment.
  • 24.
    • Birte Melsenet al (1989) found that incisor intrusion through the long axis of the tooth in adult patients with marginal bone loss had a beneficial effect on the attachment level, as long as bacterial plaque is properly controlled all along the course of movement.  New connective tissue attachment can also be formed  Thus, SRP should be done during active intrusion.
  • 25.
    CASE : IntrusionOf Central Incisor
  • 26.
     Experiments inbeagle dog demonstrated that with tipping and intruding movements, forces were capable of causing a gingival lesion to be converted to a lesion associated with attachment loss.  In tipping movements, the force should be light and the area kept clean to prevent the formation of angular bony defects. Tipping
  • 27.
     It hasbeen suggested that movement into infrabony defects can result in healing and regeneration of the attachment apparatus.  Wide osseous defect adjacent to a tooth → the teeth were moved in order to narrow the defect → better healing potential may be possible. Bodily movement into a defect
  • 28.
     Wennstrom etal (1993) evaluated in animal experiments the effect of orthodontic tooth movement on the level of the connective tissue attachment in sites with infrabony pockets.  Orthodontic therapy involving bodily movement of teeth with inflamed, infrabony pocket may enhance the rate of connective tissue loss.
  • 29.
    Implants for replacingmissing teeth: Implants remain positionally stable under orthodontic/orthopedic forces. They should be stable for 4-6 mnths before use as orthodontic anchor [Shapiro & Kokich, 1988]. If implant is not being used for anchorage, to be placed after the orthodontic therapy.
  • 30.
    Orthodontic implants  Easyto insert and remove  Immediate loading Diameter: 1.2-2.3 Length: 6-14 mm
  • 31.
     The dimensionof the alveolar ridge is an important consideration prior to orthodontics movement. Alveolar Ridge Narrow buccolingually Fenestration & dehiscence Movement into edentulous spaces
  • 32.
    •Movement into verticallyreduced bone is not a contraindication for tooth movement [Thilander, 1996]. •When tooth is moved through cortical plate: no bone formation (Steiner et al, 1981) •Light forces are applied to move teeth bodily into area with reduced bone height having cancellous bone, ↓ Recreate a thin bone plate ahead of the moving tooth [Lindskog-Stokland et al, 1993].
  • 33.
    [Lindskog-Stokland et al,1993] CASE: Bodily movement of tooth before implant placement
  • 34.
    Periodontal surgery associatedwith orthodontic therapy
  • 35.
    Evaluation of anaberrant frenum: 1.Vestibular depth 2.Width of attached gingiva 3.Tension test 4.Marginal tissue recession 5.Midline diastema (controversial) Aberrant frenum
  • 36.
     FRENECTOMY: completeremoval of the frenum including it’s attachment to underlying bone.  FRENOTOMY: incision of the frenum relocating the frenal attachment so as to create a zone of attached gingiva between gingival margin and frenum.
  • 37.
  • 38.
    Gingival Invaginations  Incompleteadaptation of supporting structures during orthodontic closure of extraction spaces in adults may result in infolding or invagination of the gingiva.
  • 39.
    Removal of gingivalinvagination Edwards, 1971
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Gummy smile CAUSES: 1. Verticalmaxillary excess 2. Delayed apical migration of gingival margins [Kokich, 1996] 3. Over-eruption of the upper anteriors
  • 42.
    GINGIVAL DISPLAY TREATMENT Gingivectomy  Flap surgery with or without ostectomy  Apical positioning of flap with or without osseous resection
  • 43.
    CASE : Correctionof gummy smile
  • 44.
    Gingival margin discrepancy Accordingto Kokich et al (1996), the relationship of gingival margin of the six maxillary anterior teeth plays an important role in esthetic appearance of teeth.
  • 45.
    Gingival marginal discrepancy Inapparent Apparent Notreatment required Gingivectomy Intrusion and incisal restoration Extrusion, fiberotomy & incisal edge equilibration Surgical crown lengthening If deep sulcus If short CI >LI If incisal edge is abraded Encroachment of biologic width
  • 46.
    CASE : Gingivectomydone for crown lengthening
  • 47.
    Orthodontic intrusion tocorrect gingival marginal discrepancy & short clinical crown
  • 48.
  • 49.
    Surgical exposure ofunerrupted teeth Excision of gingival tissue over the embedded tooth is done to achieve crown exposure.
  • 50.
  • 51.
    Gingival augmentation Thin gingivalbiotype prone to recession
  • 52.
     If thickgingival tissue is present, gingival recession is less likely to occur.  In areas of a labially positioned tooth with dehiscence, bone may re-form and gingival thickness and keratinized tissue may increase when the tooth is moved lingually. [Busschop et al, 1985]
  • 53.
     Other clinicalstudies (Dorfman 1978, Coatoam et al. 1981) have shown that → a narrow band of gingiva is capable of withstanding the stress caused by orthodontic forces.  Results from an experimental study (Wennstrom et al. 1987) indicate that → as long as the tooth is moved within the envelope of the alveolar process, the risk of harmful side effects on the marginal soft tissue is minimal.
  • 54.
     Many researchersand clinicians agree that thin labial tissues should be augmented before labial orthodontic tooth movement is begun. (Steiner et al. 1981, Foushee et al. 1985, Maynard 1987, Wennstrom et al. 1987).
  • 55.
    CASE : FreeGingival Graft irt 31
  • 56.
    Rapid maxillary expansion(RME ) and gingival recession Graber and Vanarsdall stated that if the maxillary expansion is performed after the midpalatine suture begins to fuse (after approximately 14 to 16 years of age), there is a greater risk of recession of the buccal gingival tissue of the maxillary premolars and molars later in life.
  • 57.
    Fiberotomy  Two soft-tissue periodontalentities may influence the stability:  1.Principal fibers of the periodontal ligament, and 2.Supra-alveolar fibers.
  • 58.
    Gingival hyperplasia Gingival hyperplasia Reversible Gingivectomy/ plasty Interfere with toothmovement Usually develops 1-2 months after ortho appliance is placed
  • 59.
  • 60.
     Dr. ThomasWilcko & Dr.William Wilcko → Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (AOO)  In May 1998 the AOOTM procedure was introduced at the 98th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontics.  Patented by “Wilckodontics”
  • 61.
  • 62.
    Fixed orthodontic treatment: Bracketplacement, archwire placement  Incision: Intrasulcular incisions/1mm below marginal gingiva  Flap reflection: buccal and lingual full thickness flaps  Decortication: bone bur No, ½, 2, 4  Bone grafting: DFDBA alone or combined with bovine- derived xenograft  Fixed orthodontic treatment: Heavy forces (0-18 Ni Ti) 1 week after surgery. More frequent reactivation (force application every 1-3 weeks)
  • 63.
  • 64.
    Treatment time: 7months, 1week
  • 65.
  • 66.
    Advantages Reduced treatment time(60-70%) Decreased tendency for relapse Decreased root resorption Improved retention Prevents re - crowding of lower incisors Reduced postoperative complications (devitalisation, ankylosis)
  • 67.
    Disadvantages Risk of morbidity(surgical procedure) Need for long-term peer-viewed data and more animal studies Coordination between orthodontist and surgeon
  • 68.
  • 69.
    Before orthodontic treatment Increasing keratinized tissue
  • 70.
    (Zachrisson, 1996)  Inregenerative procedures, a follow up period of four to six months, depending on disease severity, should elapse before placement of fixed appliances.  During this period the periodontal status is evaluated and the patients oral hygiene is monitored.
  • 71.
    During orthodontic treatment All adult patients should have thorough periodontal maintenance every 3 months [Boyd et al, 1989].  Soft-tissue periodontal surgery: Frenectomy/Frenotomy
  • 72.
  • 73.
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76.
    CONCLUSION • Adult orthodontictooth movement can be performed on both healthy and diseased periodontia with few detrimental effects provided physiologic forces are used, periodontal inflammation is controlled and meticulous oral hygiene is maintained throughout active therapy. • By combining the talents of the periodontist and the orthodontist, we can have an optimal treatment result.
  • 77.
    1.Clinical Periodontology –8th & 9th edition Carranza 2.Clinical Periodontology & Implantology – 3rd & 4th edition Lindhe 3.Contemporary orthodontic: Profitt 4.Orthodontics & Periodontitis: B.U. Zachission and A. Baldouf. 5.Evidence based care in orthodontic and Periodontics. A review of literature: Noran Saunders (JADA, Vol. 130, April 1999) 6.Gingival response to orthodontic force: Meir Redlier et al (AJODO 1999:116:152-8). 7.Quintessence Int. 1992; 23:509-513. 8.J. Periodontal 2001:72:858-869. 9.Australian Orthodontic journal Vol. 19 Nov.1 April 2003. 10.Eur J. of Orthodon. Vol. 25, No. 6, 579-584, 2003.
  • 78.

Editor's Notes

  • #14 The segmented arch technique in orthodontics involves dividing the dental arch into separate segments to allow for controlled tooth movement and precise force application. This technique is often used to address complex malocclusions, such as deep bites, open bites, and crowding, where individualized tooth movements are crucial.
  • #18 as we can see in this picture at first there is crowding and recession present in this case.but as the teeth are treated by orthodontic t/t occlusal harmony appears also recesion is reduced and gingiva appears more healthy
  • #21  A tooth with a short root or an unusual root shape may not be suitable for forced extrusion. level of fracture : Comparison of crown-and-root ratio between crown lengthening only (5:4) and extrusion with osseous surgery or fiberotomy (4:4) when treating a fractured tooth with inadequate ferrule for full coverage restoration.
  • #27 In addition, it is believed that In the presence of a
  • #32 When light forces are applied to move teeth bodily into area with reduced bone height having cancellous bone, it can recreate a thin bone plate ahead of the moving tooth
  • #33 Key to moving tooth with bone is by directly resorping the bone in direction of movement [Melsen, 1991]. Key to moving tooth with bone is by directly resorping the bone in direction of movement [Melsen, 1991].
  • #35 A U- or V-shaped roentgenographic appearance of the interproximal bone between the maxillary central incisors is a diagnostic key to the persistent midline diastema.
  • #38 No correlation was found between space reopening and presence and severity of invaginations by Circuns and Tulloch, 1983. Rivera et al 1971. gingival clefts could cause opening of extraction spaces and advocated its excision.
  • #52 It is interesting to note that
  • #57 Circumferential Supracrestal Fiberotomy (CSF)
  • #60 Dr. Thomas Wilcko, a periodontist, and his brother, Dr.William Wilcko, an orthodontist, have developed their own unique approach to tooth movement called Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (AOO) based on the influence of transient osteoporosis secondary to the corticotomy surgery.
  • #72 patients with incipient to advanced osseous problems should follow a systematic program of maintenance, stabilization, occlusal adjustment, and re-evaluation prior to restorative therapy.
  • #76 Adult orthodontic tooth movement can be performed on both healthy and diseased periodontia with few detrimental effects provided physiologic forces are used, periodontal inflammation is controlled and meticulous oral hygiene is maintained throughout active therapy. By combining the talents of the periodontist and the orthodontist, we can have an optimal treatment result.