Peer Evaluation For Congress Project
•Download as RTF, PDF•
0 likes•154 views
This peer evaluation form asks the student to rate their partner on a group project on a scale of 1 to 5 in three categories: being on task, doing their part, and responsibility. It also provides space for comments about the partner's performance that may be shared with group members.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Ww i part 2
The document outlines the alliances and neutral countries at the start of World War 1, with Germany and Austria-Hungary allied against France, Britain, Russia, Belgium, and later the United States. It then describes how the German plan for a quick victory failed, resulting in brutal trench warfare that lasted for years with little movement at huge human cost. Propaganda and total war involving civilians increased as the war dragged on with massive battles like the Somme and Verdun achieving little.
Demographics Of Congress
The document discusses demographics of Congress and provides information on Texas Congress members, Senate leaders, House leaders, and current legislation. It includes graphs/charts on Congress demographics and lists members of Congress from Texas with their district, election year, terms served, and background. Information is also given on Senate and House leaders such as their picture, election year, terms served, and home state. Finally, current legislation is listed with sponsor, originating house, and brief explanation.
Grading Rubric Congress Project
This document outlines a grading rubric for a Congress project. It provides sections to fill in details about demographics of Congress, Texas Congress members, Senate leaders, House leaders, current events, and a section for peer evaluation and total grade. Students are expected to provide names, images, election dates, and other information about various Congress members and leaders.
How did WWI end up in the Trenches?
The document summarizes key events that led to the stalemate of World War I on the Western Front. It discusses how the failure of the Schlieffen Plan and the Battle of the Marne prevented either side from gaining ground, forcing both armies to dig in along hundreds of miles of trenches. The development of new weapons like machine guns and artillery made offensive operations nearly impossible, as attacking forces could be cut down before reaching enemy lines. This resulted in static trench warfare without major advances by either side for much of the war.
Essential things that should always be in your car
A driver can bail out of a lot of sticky situations if he plans ahead. More often than not, things go south on you when you think nothing could go wrong. So it pays to hope for the best and plan for the worst, especially on the road. Here are some things that should always be kept in your car for all those just in case moments.
Activism x Technology
What happens when the digital tools and platforms we make and use for communication and entertainment are hijacked for terrorism, violence against the vulnerable and nefarious transactions? What role do designers and developers play? Are we complicit as creators of these technologies and products? Should we police them or fight back? As Portfolio Lead for Northern Lab, Northern Trust's internal innovation startup focused on client and partner experience, Antonio will share a mix of provocative scenarios torn from today's headlines and compelling stories where activism and technology facilitated peace—and war.
As a call-to-action for designers and developers to engage in projects capable of transformational change, he'll explore the question: How might technology foster new experiences to better accelerate social activism and make the world a smarter, safer place?
How to Battle Bad Reviews
Learn how to battle bad reviews - and why you shouldn't fear bad Glassdoor reviews: http://gldr.co/FearReview
Proposal Template
This document outlines the requirements for a group fusion project. It requests the group name, project title, objective, sources of information, group member names and roles. It also has sections for describing the tasks, explaining why they chose their project name and what it shows, how it relates to the topic, and space for teacher comments. The document pledges the group will brainstorm ideas, respect others, listen, help each other, and appreciate contributions.
Recommended
Ww i part 2
The document outlines the alliances and neutral countries at the start of World War 1, with Germany and Austria-Hungary allied against France, Britain, Russia, Belgium, and later the United States. It then describes how the German plan for a quick victory failed, resulting in brutal trench warfare that lasted for years with little movement at huge human cost. Propaganda and total war involving civilians increased as the war dragged on with massive battles like the Somme and Verdun achieving little.
Demographics Of Congress
The document discusses demographics of Congress and provides information on Texas Congress members, Senate leaders, House leaders, and current legislation. It includes graphs/charts on Congress demographics and lists members of Congress from Texas with their district, election year, terms served, and background. Information is also given on Senate and House leaders such as their picture, election year, terms served, and home state. Finally, current legislation is listed with sponsor, originating house, and brief explanation.
Grading Rubric Congress Project
This document outlines a grading rubric for a Congress project. It provides sections to fill in details about demographics of Congress, Texas Congress members, Senate leaders, House leaders, current events, and a section for peer evaluation and total grade. Students are expected to provide names, images, election dates, and other information about various Congress members and leaders.
How did WWI end up in the Trenches?
The document summarizes key events that led to the stalemate of World War I on the Western Front. It discusses how the failure of the Schlieffen Plan and the Battle of the Marne prevented either side from gaining ground, forcing both armies to dig in along hundreds of miles of trenches. The development of new weapons like machine guns and artillery made offensive operations nearly impossible, as attacking forces could be cut down before reaching enemy lines. This resulted in static trench warfare without major advances by either side for much of the war.
Essential things that should always be in your car
A driver can bail out of a lot of sticky situations if he plans ahead. More often than not, things go south on you when you think nothing could go wrong. So it pays to hope for the best and plan for the worst, especially on the road. Here are some things that should always be kept in your car for all those just in case moments.
Activism x Technology
What happens when the digital tools and platforms we make and use for communication and entertainment are hijacked for terrorism, violence against the vulnerable and nefarious transactions? What role do designers and developers play? Are we complicit as creators of these technologies and products? Should we police them or fight back? As Portfolio Lead for Northern Lab, Northern Trust's internal innovation startup focused on client and partner experience, Antonio will share a mix of provocative scenarios torn from today's headlines and compelling stories where activism and technology facilitated peace—and war.
As a call-to-action for designers and developers to engage in projects capable of transformational change, he'll explore the question: How might technology foster new experiences to better accelerate social activism and make the world a smarter, safer place?
How to Battle Bad Reviews
Learn how to battle bad reviews - and why you shouldn't fear bad Glassdoor reviews: http://gldr.co/FearReview
Proposal Template
This document outlines the requirements for a group fusion project. It requests the group name, project title, objective, sources of information, group member names and roles. It also has sections for describing the tasks, explaining why they chose their project name and what it shows, how it relates to the topic, and space for teacher comments. The document pledges the group will brainstorm ideas, respect others, listen, help each other, and appreciate contributions.
Team Performance Evaluation FormADMG 374This form is used to e.docx
Team Performance Evaluation Form
ADMG 374
This form is used to evaluate each group member's contribution to the project. Each student must complete this form by 10 p.m. Tuesday of week 10.Your grade on this assignment will be based on your team members' peer review scores.
Be objective, honest, and fair when evaluating each member in your project group!
Note: This form is used to evaluate each group member's contribution to the project. It will only be seen by the instructor.
Your name: _____________________________________ Group #: _______________
Your group project name: __________________________________________________
Part I:Write the name of all the members of your group below (include your name) and their corresponding contribution to the project as a percentage of the overall total. The total should add to 100 once all team members’ contributions have been factored. Add more lines as needed.
Name of the group members Contribution
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
Total should add to 100 => 100
Please describe briefly your role(s) and what you have contributed to the project. BE SPECIFIC:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Part II:For each member of your group (exclude yourself), write the name and evaluate them on the following parameters (check corresponding items). In the "Comments" field, please describe in details about what is contributed by that particular member to the project:
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take responsibilities and was dependable
…help distribute work load effectively and equitably by consensus
Comments (required):
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take responsibilities and was dependable
…help distribute work load effectively and equitably by consensus
Comments (required):
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take res ...
Beta reader worksheet
This document is a worksheet for beta readers to evaluate various elements of a story such as the conflict, resolution, setting, organization, action, grammar, overall description, and characters. The beta reader rates each element on a scale of 1 to 5 and provides suggestions for improvement. There is also a section for overall comments on the story.
Exam Content1. Top of FormWrite a 4 page (content) memo to t.docx
Exam Content
1.
Top of Form
Write a 4 page (content) memo to the CEO of the company you’ve been assessing throughout the course, outlining your plan to create economic, social, and environmental value.
An executive summary of the memo ( separate from the memo)
Your memo, that includes the following items:
· A summary of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses, and recommendations for converting weaknesses into strengths
· A summary of your Week three findings on Porter’s Five Forces
· A summary of your week four findings on the Diamond of National Advantage
· A summary of yourweek5 analysis of the firm as a learning organization
· Strategic recommendations based on your previous work in this course.
Include
The opportunity identified in week 2, with your rationale/justification/explanation
The move into the country identified in week four with your rationale/justification/explanation
Recommended moves toward being a learning organization with your rationale/justification/explanation
NOTE: The bullet points are not the core of the assignment they are in addition and/or part of your plan
THIS IS A BUSINESS MEMO so format and write it as a business memo, thus
NO APA title page is required because your
name is required on the memo
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
Bottom of Form
image3.png
image4.png
image5.jpeg
image6.png
image7.png
image8.jpeg
image9.png
image10.jpeg
image11.png
image12.jpeg
image13.png
image14.png
image15.jpeg
image16.png
image17.jpeg
image18.png
image19.jpeg
image20.jpeg
image21.png
image22.png
image23.jpeg
image1.png
image2.png
CHDV 3210
Torres
Community Analysis Project & Civic Engagement Letter
Survey Data & Interpretation
Purpose:
The purpose of this assignment is to compile the data you/your team collected from the Community Analysis Project survey. This data will be used to analyze the trends of concerns within your chosen community regarding your chosen topic. You will use this data to create an intervention plan. The intervention plan will be presented in PowerPoint and a letter to a designated government representative.
Criteria for Success:
This assignment is worth 15 points total.
Breakdown of points:
· Updated consent form & survey link (1 point)
· Data from 15-45 participants (15 per team member) (1 point)
· Table(s) of data (must include questions and statistics on responses) (3 points)
· Interpretation of how this data will help create your intervention plan/suggested solution for the community problem (5 points)
· Advocacy Letter Proposal (5 points)
Only
ONE partner should submit the assignment. Partners will receive the same grade for the assignment.
Points will be deducted for spelling and grammatical errors.
Due Date:
Monday, October 31, 2022, by 11:59 pm.
Submission Format:
Re-upload this template. Must be submitted as .doc, .docx, or
.pdf - Other formats .
Interview assessment panel_members
This document is an interview assessment form used to evaluate candidates for a particular job posting and department. It contains sections to score candidates on their education, work experience, personality, potential, general knowledge, communication skills, interest in and knowledge of the position and department, computer skills, problem solving skills, and other job-related criteria. Space is also provided for comments. The form is used by a panel member to systematically evaluate candidates during an interview based on evidence from questions asked.
Peer editingoverview worksheet
The document outlines the three step process for peer editing:
1. The first step is to provide compliments on the strengths and positives of the work.
2. The second step is to give suggestive feedback by being specific, brief, and constructive.
3. The third step is to identify spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors by using editing marks. The document provides examples and guidelines for each step of the peer editing process.
Transition Year Work Experience & Voc Preperation
This document contains information and exercises for students regarding career investigation and preparation for work experience. It is divided into 8 units that cover topics such as choosing a career, finding work experience, developing job skills, and reviewing the work experience. The exercises include self-assessments, interviews with professionals, researching courses and employers, creating a CV and cover letter, practicing phone calls and interviews, and planning for potential issues during work placement. The goal is to help students investigate career options and gain skills for job searching, applications, and work readiness.
Math reflection
This document contains a self-reflection form for a group project on parallel and perpendicular lines. It asks students to reflect on how they helped their group, how they could have been more productive, to rate each group member on a scale of 1-4, and to provide one piece of warm and one piece of cool feedback for each member.
Professional development evaluation form
This professional development evaluation form asks participants to rate various aspects of a professional development session on a scale of 1 to 5, including how clearly the objectives were communicated, how relevant the objectives and activities were, and whether the stated objectives were met. It also provides space for comments on the session's strengths and areas for improvement.
Adobe typography review (1)
The document is a worksheet containing questions about a presentation on typography. It asks about how typography affects perception, the four principles of design for typography, the four factors of legibility, the differences between serif and sans serif fonts, guidelines for text size, line spacing, alignment, uniformity, contrast, and tracking. The questions require recalling and explaining concepts from the typography presentation.
Online activities for pronoun
This document contains a group assignment where students are asked to rate their participation in online grammar activities. It includes a section for group member names and scores, as well as reports on activities completed for lessons on possessive and personal pronouns. The activities include quizzes and games, and students are asked to submit printouts as proof of completion.
Grant Writing - Project Proposal Workbook
A workbook for writing the project proposal. The proposal workbook develops the project idea, the budget, the schedule, the resources, and builds internal and external support for the project.
Sem 2 mea 2 peer assessment
This peer evaluation form is used by students to evaluate the contributions and teamwork of their peers on a group project. Students are asked to rate each group member on a scale of 1 to 4 based on criteria such as contribution of ideas, problem-solving, focus, reliability, quality of work, and ability to work with others. The ratings are submitted along with the group project and will be considered in the final evaluation, though the peer evaluation itself is not the sole basis for grading. Guidelines are provided to help students assess their peers' performance in each criteria at the 4, 3, 2, and 1 point levels.
Peer eval
This document is a student peer evaluation sheet for evaluating group members on a project. It asks the student to list each group member and rate them on a scale of 1 to 3 on criteria such as doing their fair share of work, cooperation, contribution of ideas, availability, positivity, and contribution to overall project success. It also has space for comments on each group member and asks the student to provide a word describing each person as a group member. Finally, it asks the student to rate their own contribution compared to other group members and explain their self-evaluation score.
Rubric descriptors
This rubric evaluates a student or group's work on an objective or project based on criteria such as accuracy, understanding, development, clarity, consistency, evidence, and completeness. Performance is rated on a scale from limited to extensive, with comments provided to suggest areas for improvement.
A Critical Thinking Analysis (Analyzing the Logic of the Article.docx
This document provides instructions and a template for students to complete a critical thinking analysis of an article for a sociology class. It includes sections for an abstract, introduction, summary, conclusion, and references. Students are asked to address the author's purpose, key questions, methods, important information, results, inferences, and implications. It also includes a checklist to ensure all requirements are met for the assignment.
Completed advanced practicum application
This document is an application for an advanced practicum. It requests information from the applicant such as their name, the semester they are enrolled in PSY 357, the child they have worked with, and which semester they are interested in for the advanced practicum. It outlines the requirements of attending Woodsedge 10 hours a week, attending meetings with supervisors, and assisting case coordinators. The second page is for a supervisor evaluation that rates the applicant's skills and provides comments on their performance working with children, accepting feedback, interactions with staff, and a recommendation for the advanced practicum.
Murdock, k. imt 662 898 fa10-cbi_peer_revcommentsheet
This peer review comment sheet provides a structured way for classmates to give feedback on each other's papers. Reviewers are asked to rate papers on development of details/ideas, organization, awareness of audience, word choice, sentence variety, and conventions/grammar/spelling. For each category, reviewers circle needs improvement, good, or excellent and provide specific comments on the paper's strengths and areas for improvement.
2009 2010 Agreement
This document outlines a mentor/mentee agreement between two individuals beginning in [today] and ending in April 2010. It details the communication expectations, which include meeting once a month in person and conducting quick check-ins by email or phone between meetings. Goals for both the student and mentor are listed in several categories, along with action steps and methods for assessing progress and providing feedback. Guidelines around professional conduct, confidentiality, and monthly check-ins with the Pathways program are also established.
Work Experience 1 Learner's Record
This document contains a learner's record for a work experience module. It includes sections on pre-placement planning, the work placement, and reviewing the experience. The pre-placement section includes self-assessment exercises, how to handle common work situations, and arrangements for the first day. The placement section includes templates to record daily duties and reflections. The review section prompts evaluating what was learned and writing thank you letters.
More Related Content
Similar to Peer Evaluation For Congress Project
Team Performance Evaluation FormADMG 374This form is used to e.docx
Team Performance Evaluation Form
ADMG 374
This form is used to evaluate each group member's contribution to the project. Each student must complete this form by 10 p.m. Tuesday of week 10.Your grade on this assignment will be based on your team members' peer review scores.
Be objective, honest, and fair when evaluating each member in your project group!
Note: This form is used to evaluate each group member's contribution to the project. It will only be seen by the instructor.
Your name: _____________________________________ Group #: _______________
Your group project name: __________________________________________________
Part I:Write the name of all the members of your group below (include your name) and their corresponding contribution to the project as a percentage of the overall total. The total should add to 100 once all team members’ contributions have been factored. Add more lines as needed.
Name of the group members Contribution
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
___________________________________ ____________
Total should add to 100 => 100
Please describe briefly your role(s) and what you have contributed to the project. BE SPECIFIC:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Part II:For each member of your group (exclude yourself), write the name and evaluate them on the following parameters (check corresponding items). In the "Comments" field, please describe in details about what is contributed by that particular member to the project:
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take responsibilities and was dependable
…help distribute work load effectively and equitably by consensus
Comments (required):
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take responsibilities and was dependable
…help distribute work load effectively and equitably by consensus
Comments (required):
To what extent did…
__Name___________________________
Not at all
To some extent
To moderate extent
To great extent
To an exceptional extent
…share the work load of the task at hand
…actively participate in discussions and meetings
…take res ...
Beta reader worksheet
This document is a worksheet for beta readers to evaluate various elements of a story such as the conflict, resolution, setting, organization, action, grammar, overall description, and characters. The beta reader rates each element on a scale of 1 to 5 and provides suggestions for improvement. There is also a section for overall comments on the story.
Exam Content1. Top of FormWrite a 4 page (content) memo to t.docx
Exam Content
1.
Top of Form
Write a 4 page (content) memo to the CEO of the company you’ve been assessing throughout the course, outlining your plan to create economic, social, and environmental value.
An executive summary of the memo ( separate from the memo)
Your memo, that includes the following items:
· A summary of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses, and recommendations for converting weaknesses into strengths
· A summary of your Week three findings on Porter’s Five Forces
· A summary of your week four findings on the Diamond of National Advantage
· A summary of yourweek5 analysis of the firm as a learning organization
· Strategic recommendations based on your previous work in this course.
Include
The opportunity identified in week 2, with your rationale/justification/explanation
The move into the country identified in week four with your rationale/justification/explanation
Recommended moves toward being a learning organization with your rationale/justification/explanation
NOTE: The bullet points are not the core of the assignment they are in addition and/or part of your plan
THIS IS A BUSINESS MEMO so format and write it as a business memo, thus
NO APA title page is required because your
name is required on the memo
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
Bottom of Form
image3.png
image4.png
image5.jpeg
image6.png
image7.png
image8.jpeg
image9.png
image10.jpeg
image11.png
image12.jpeg
image13.png
image14.png
image15.jpeg
image16.png
image17.jpeg
image18.png
image19.jpeg
image20.jpeg
image21.png
image22.png
image23.jpeg
image1.png
image2.png
CHDV 3210
Torres
Community Analysis Project & Civic Engagement Letter
Survey Data & Interpretation
Purpose:
The purpose of this assignment is to compile the data you/your team collected from the Community Analysis Project survey. This data will be used to analyze the trends of concerns within your chosen community regarding your chosen topic. You will use this data to create an intervention plan. The intervention plan will be presented in PowerPoint and a letter to a designated government representative.
Criteria for Success:
This assignment is worth 15 points total.
Breakdown of points:
· Updated consent form & survey link (1 point)
· Data from 15-45 participants (15 per team member) (1 point)
· Table(s) of data (must include questions and statistics on responses) (3 points)
· Interpretation of how this data will help create your intervention plan/suggested solution for the community problem (5 points)
· Advocacy Letter Proposal (5 points)
Only
ONE partner should submit the assignment. Partners will receive the same grade for the assignment.
Points will be deducted for spelling and grammatical errors.
Due Date:
Monday, October 31, 2022, by 11:59 pm.
Submission Format:
Re-upload this template. Must be submitted as .doc, .docx, or
.pdf - Other formats .
Interview assessment panel_members
This document is an interview assessment form used to evaluate candidates for a particular job posting and department. It contains sections to score candidates on their education, work experience, personality, potential, general knowledge, communication skills, interest in and knowledge of the position and department, computer skills, problem solving skills, and other job-related criteria. Space is also provided for comments. The form is used by a panel member to systematically evaluate candidates during an interview based on evidence from questions asked.
Peer editingoverview worksheet
The document outlines the three step process for peer editing:
1. The first step is to provide compliments on the strengths and positives of the work.
2. The second step is to give suggestive feedback by being specific, brief, and constructive.
3. The third step is to identify spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors by using editing marks. The document provides examples and guidelines for each step of the peer editing process.
Transition Year Work Experience & Voc Preperation
This document contains information and exercises for students regarding career investigation and preparation for work experience. It is divided into 8 units that cover topics such as choosing a career, finding work experience, developing job skills, and reviewing the work experience. The exercises include self-assessments, interviews with professionals, researching courses and employers, creating a CV and cover letter, practicing phone calls and interviews, and planning for potential issues during work placement. The goal is to help students investigate career options and gain skills for job searching, applications, and work readiness.
Math reflection
This document contains a self-reflection form for a group project on parallel and perpendicular lines. It asks students to reflect on how they helped their group, how they could have been more productive, to rate each group member on a scale of 1-4, and to provide one piece of warm and one piece of cool feedback for each member.
Professional development evaluation form
This professional development evaluation form asks participants to rate various aspects of a professional development session on a scale of 1 to 5, including how clearly the objectives were communicated, how relevant the objectives and activities were, and whether the stated objectives were met. It also provides space for comments on the session's strengths and areas for improvement.
Adobe typography review (1)
The document is a worksheet containing questions about a presentation on typography. It asks about how typography affects perception, the four principles of design for typography, the four factors of legibility, the differences between serif and sans serif fonts, guidelines for text size, line spacing, alignment, uniformity, contrast, and tracking. The questions require recalling and explaining concepts from the typography presentation.
Online activities for pronoun
This document contains a group assignment where students are asked to rate their participation in online grammar activities. It includes a section for group member names and scores, as well as reports on activities completed for lessons on possessive and personal pronouns. The activities include quizzes and games, and students are asked to submit printouts as proof of completion.
Grant Writing - Project Proposal Workbook
A workbook for writing the project proposal. The proposal workbook develops the project idea, the budget, the schedule, the resources, and builds internal and external support for the project.
Sem 2 mea 2 peer assessment
This peer evaluation form is used by students to evaluate the contributions and teamwork of their peers on a group project. Students are asked to rate each group member on a scale of 1 to 4 based on criteria such as contribution of ideas, problem-solving, focus, reliability, quality of work, and ability to work with others. The ratings are submitted along with the group project and will be considered in the final evaluation, though the peer evaluation itself is not the sole basis for grading. Guidelines are provided to help students assess their peers' performance in each criteria at the 4, 3, 2, and 1 point levels.
Peer eval
This document is a student peer evaluation sheet for evaluating group members on a project. It asks the student to list each group member and rate them on a scale of 1 to 3 on criteria such as doing their fair share of work, cooperation, contribution of ideas, availability, positivity, and contribution to overall project success. It also has space for comments on each group member and asks the student to provide a word describing each person as a group member. Finally, it asks the student to rate their own contribution compared to other group members and explain their self-evaluation score.
Rubric descriptors
This rubric evaluates a student or group's work on an objective or project based on criteria such as accuracy, understanding, development, clarity, consistency, evidence, and completeness. Performance is rated on a scale from limited to extensive, with comments provided to suggest areas for improvement.
A Critical Thinking Analysis (Analyzing the Logic of the Article.docx
This document provides instructions and a template for students to complete a critical thinking analysis of an article for a sociology class. It includes sections for an abstract, introduction, summary, conclusion, and references. Students are asked to address the author's purpose, key questions, methods, important information, results, inferences, and implications. It also includes a checklist to ensure all requirements are met for the assignment.
Completed advanced practicum application
This document is an application for an advanced practicum. It requests information from the applicant such as their name, the semester they are enrolled in PSY 357, the child they have worked with, and which semester they are interested in for the advanced practicum. It outlines the requirements of attending Woodsedge 10 hours a week, attending meetings with supervisors, and assisting case coordinators. The second page is for a supervisor evaluation that rates the applicant's skills and provides comments on their performance working with children, accepting feedback, interactions with staff, and a recommendation for the advanced practicum.
Murdock, k. imt 662 898 fa10-cbi_peer_revcommentsheet
This peer review comment sheet provides a structured way for classmates to give feedback on each other's papers. Reviewers are asked to rate papers on development of details/ideas, organization, awareness of audience, word choice, sentence variety, and conventions/grammar/spelling. For each category, reviewers circle needs improvement, good, or excellent and provide specific comments on the paper's strengths and areas for improvement.
2009 2010 Agreement
This document outlines a mentor/mentee agreement between two individuals beginning in [today] and ending in April 2010. It details the communication expectations, which include meeting once a month in person and conducting quick check-ins by email or phone between meetings. Goals for both the student and mentor are listed in several categories, along with action steps and methods for assessing progress and providing feedback. Guidelines around professional conduct, confidentiality, and monthly check-ins with the Pathways program are also established.
Work Experience 1 Learner's Record
This document contains a learner's record for a work experience module. It includes sections on pre-placement planning, the work placement, and reviewing the experience. The pre-placement section includes self-assessment exercises, how to handle common work situations, and arrangements for the first day. The placement section includes templates to record daily duties and reflections. The review section prompts evaluating what was learned and writing thank you letters.
Similar to Peer Evaluation For Congress Project (20)
Team Performance Evaluation FormADMG 374This form is used to e.docx
Team Performance Evaluation FormADMG 374This form is used to e.docx
Exam Content1. Top of FormWrite a 4 page (content) memo to t.docx
Exam Content1. Top of FormWrite a 4 page (content) memo to t.docx
A Critical Thinking Analysis (Analyzing the Logic of the Article.docx
A Critical Thinking Analysis (Analyzing the Logic of the Article.docx
Murdock, k. imt 662 898 fa10-cbi_peer_revcommentsheet
Murdock, k. imt 662 898 fa10-cbi_peer_revcommentsheet
Peer Evaluation For Congress Project
- 1. Peer Evaluation for Congress Project Your Name:_______________________________________________ *Note: some of your comments may be shared with your group members Rate your partner on the following (1 is the worst and 5 is the best): Name of partner_______________________________________________ On Task: 1 2 3 4 5 Did his/her part: 1 2 3 4 5 Responsibility: 1 2 3 4 5 Comments:___________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Peer Evaluation for Congress Project Your Name:_______________________________________________ *Note: some of your comments may be shared with your group members Rate your partner on the following (1 is the worst and 5 is the best): Name of partner_______________________________________________ On Task: 1 2 3 4 5 Did his/her part: 1 2 3 4 5 Responsibility: 1 2 3 4 5 Comments:___________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________