This proposal starts from the premise that the States must be fundamentally accountable for any pandemic business income coverage program because:
• The orders triggering pandemic business income loss originate and terminate as decisions made by the individual States; and
• The responsibility to manage the economic consequences of those individual State decisions should likewise reside with the respective States.
This document outlines regulations for agriculture financing in Pakistan. It discusses the importance of agriculture to Pakistan's economy and employment. It then provides definitions for key terms related to agriculture financing. The general regulations section establishes rules for assessing borrower repayment capacity, developing comprehensive agriculture financing policies, using standardized documents, expeditious processing of applications, exposure limits, maximum unsecured financing amounts, repayment schedules and grace periods, ensuring proper loan use, obtaining credit reports, and know-your-customer requirements. Specific regulations are then provided for various types of agriculture loans including inputs, development, machinery/equipment, and livestock. Regulations address loan terms, security, insurance, classification, and provisioning. Finally, regulations for corporate farming loans address linking financial indicators
What’s in Your Rule Book? A Common Sense Approach to Plan Documentation.CBIZ, Inc.
Two recent eligibility opportunities, one created as a result of a US Supreme Court decision and the other enacted by law, are a wake-up call for plan sponsors of welfare and pension benefit plans to review and update, as appropriate, the terms of their plans. As is well known by now, the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor1 extended federal tax and benefit rights to couples in a same-sex marriage. In addition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) incents employers to extend
eligibility to their workforce or risk an excise tax penalty. Plan sponsors should review their plan documents in light of these recent developments to ensure that the plan language is current and compliant.
Health Reform Bulletin 120 | Proposed Reliant Regulations.CBIZ, Inc.
The latest HRB provides insight into the following: Proposed Regulations: Expatriate Health Plans, Excepted Benefit Plans, Essential Health Benefits relating to Lifetime and Annual Limits, and Individual Shared Responsibility Requirements; IRS Releases Draft 2016 Forms 1094/1095.
This document outlines the key details of a Broadform Public and Products Liability Insurance Policy, including:
1) The policy provides coverage for legal liability under sections A (public liability) and B (products liability), as well as extensions for product recall expenses and errors/omissions.
2) The limits of liability and deductible amounts are specified. Defense costs and supplementary payments are additional to the limits.
3) The policy lists numerous exclusions to coverage, including for aircraft, defective work, products liability, property damage, vehicles, advertising injury, asbestos, and more.
4) Important definitions, conditions, and notices regarding the insured's duty of disclosure and privacy are also included.
The purpose of this Act is to set forth standards for the investigation and disposition of claims arising under policies or certificates of insurance issued to residents of different states. Cease and Desist and Penalty Orders. Unfair Claims Practices Defined.
This document summarizes a restricted stock unit and progressive restricted stock unit award for a company's equity incentive plan. It outlines:
1) An award notice for a participant, including the grant date, number of restricted stock units and progressive restricted stock units awarded, and vesting schedule.
2) An appendix providing details on the stock incentive pool, vesting schedules, determination of shares issuable for restricted stock units and progressive restricted stock units upon various liquidity events, and dollar limitations.
3) Incorporation of the equity incentive plan and award agreement by reference.
The document establishes an award for restricted stock and progressive restricted stock units that will vest over time and upon certain liquidity events like an
The document provides a side-by-side comparison of major provisions in the House and Senate healthcare reform proposals. Key differences include:
- The Senate bill does not include a public health insurance option but allows for non-profit co-ops
- The individual mandate penalty in the Senate bill is modified to be the lesser of a percentage of income or flat dollar amount
- The Senate bill delays coverage of pre-existing conditions for children until 2014
- Employer requirements and penalties differ between the bills
- Revenue provisions like taxes on insurance plans over a threshold and medical devices are included in the Senate bill but not the House bill
This document describes a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood of Indiana (PPIN) and others challenging a new Indiana law (HEA 1210) that defunds entities like PPIN that also perform abortions. PPIN receives state and federal funding for non-abortion services like cancer screenings and STD testing through Medicaid reimbursements and federal grants. The law immediately canceled these funding sources for PPIN, which has already stopped providing services funded by certain grants and is no longer taking new Medicaid patients due to the financial impact. The court is considering PPIN's motion for a preliminary injunction against the defunding provision.
This document outlines regulations for agriculture financing in Pakistan. It discusses the importance of agriculture to Pakistan's economy and employment. It then provides definitions for key terms related to agriculture financing. The general regulations section establishes rules for assessing borrower repayment capacity, developing comprehensive agriculture financing policies, using standardized documents, expeditious processing of applications, exposure limits, maximum unsecured financing amounts, repayment schedules and grace periods, ensuring proper loan use, obtaining credit reports, and know-your-customer requirements. Specific regulations are then provided for various types of agriculture loans including inputs, development, machinery/equipment, and livestock. Regulations address loan terms, security, insurance, classification, and provisioning. Finally, regulations for corporate farming loans address linking financial indicators
What’s in Your Rule Book? A Common Sense Approach to Plan Documentation.CBIZ, Inc.
Two recent eligibility opportunities, one created as a result of a US Supreme Court decision and the other enacted by law, are a wake-up call for plan sponsors of welfare and pension benefit plans to review and update, as appropriate, the terms of their plans. As is well known by now, the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor1 extended federal tax and benefit rights to couples in a same-sex marriage. In addition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) incents employers to extend
eligibility to their workforce or risk an excise tax penalty. Plan sponsors should review their plan documents in light of these recent developments to ensure that the plan language is current and compliant.
Health Reform Bulletin 120 | Proposed Reliant Regulations.CBIZ, Inc.
The latest HRB provides insight into the following: Proposed Regulations: Expatriate Health Plans, Excepted Benefit Plans, Essential Health Benefits relating to Lifetime and Annual Limits, and Individual Shared Responsibility Requirements; IRS Releases Draft 2016 Forms 1094/1095.
This document outlines the key details of a Broadform Public and Products Liability Insurance Policy, including:
1) The policy provides coverage for legal liability under sections A (public liability) and B (products liability), as well as extensions for product recall expenses and errors/omissions.
2) The limits of liability and deductible amounts are specified. Defense costs and supplementary payments are additional to the limits.
3) The policy lists numerous exclusions to coverage, including for aircraft, defective work, products liability, property damage, vehicles, advertising injury, asbestos, and more.
4) Important definitions, conditions, and notices regarding the insured's duty of disclosure and privacy are also included.
The purpose of this Act is to set forth standards for the investigation and disposition of claims arising under policies or certificates of insurance issued to residents of different states. Cease and Desist and Penalty Orders. Unfair Claims Practices Defined.
This document summarizes a restricted stock unit and progressive restricted stock unit award for a company's equity incentive plan. It outlines:
1) An award notice for a participant, including the grant date, number of restricted stock units and progressive restricted stock units awarded, and vesting schedule.
2) An appendix providing details on the stock incentive pool, vesting schedules, determination of shares issuable for restricted stock units and progressive restricted stock units upon various liquidity events, and dollar limitations.
3) Incorporation of the equity incentive plan and award agreement by reference.
The document establishes an award for restricted stock and progressive restricted stock units that will vest over time and upon certain liquidity events like an
The document provides a side-by-side comparison of major provisions in the House and Senate healthcare reform proposals. Key differences include:
- The Senate bill does not include a public health insurance option but allows for non-profit co-ops
- The individual mandate penalty in the Senate bill is modified to be the lesser of a percentage of income or flat dollar amount
- The Senate bill delays coverage of pre-existing conditions for children until 2014
- Employer requirements and penalties differ between the bills
- Revenue provisions like taxes on insurance plans over a threshold and medical devices are included in the Senate bill but not the House bill
This document describes a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood of Indiana (PPIN) and others challenging a new Indiana law (HEA 1210) that defunds entities like PPIN that also perform abortions. PPIN receives state and federal funding for non-abortion services like cancer screenings and STD testing through Medicaid reimbursements and federal grants. The law immediately canceled these funding sources for PPIN, which has already stopped providing services funded by certain grants and is no longer taking new Medicaid patients due to the financial impact. The court is considering PPIN's motion for a preliminary injunction against the defunding provision.
Reporting disclosure guide for employee benefit plansFPG Lynch
This document provides an overview of reporting and disclosure requirements for employee benefit plans under ERISA. It contains three chapters that outline basic disclosure requirements for pension and welfare benefit plans, additional requirements for welfare health plans and pension plans, and Form 5500 annual reporting requirements. The document is intended to help plan administrators understand their obligations to provide information to participants, beneficiaries, government agencies and others, such as summary plan descriptions, notices, and filings. It provides a high-level summary of the key documents required and timelines for distribution.
This document is a Steadfast General and Products Liability Insurance Policy that provides corporate liability solutions. It includes definitions of key terms, descriptions of what is covered and excluded, claims conditions, general conditions, and important information. Some of the main things covered are legal liability for bodily injury, property damage and advertising injury caused by or arising from the insured's business operations. Key exclusions include liability from aircraft, vehicles, asbestos, pollution, and products known to be exported to North America.
1) Planned Parenthood of Indiana filed a lawsuit challenging a new state law that prohibits state funding for any entity that performs abortions.
2) The law immediately canceled existing state contracts and grants with Planned Parenthood, including $1.36 million in Medicaid funding and $150,000 in disease intervention grants.
3) Planned Parenthood argues that the law will devastate its finances and force it to close health centers, eliminating services for thousands of patients. It is seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from taking effect.
Richard Adkerson, President and CEO of Freeport-McMoRan, sends a letter to the Secretary General of Indonesia's Ministry of Finance responding to the government's positions on divestment of Freeport's shares in its Indonesian subsidiary, PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI). Adkerson disagrees with several aspects of the government's proposal, including the valuation and timeframe of divestment. He maintains that any divestment must reflect fair value of PTFI through 2041 based on Freeport's contractual rights, and that Freeport will continue to abide by its Contract of Work while negotiations are ongoing.
Avn 67 c airline finance lease contract endorsementRidwan Ichsan
This document is an endorsement to an aircraft insurance policy to include additional parties. It provides that in the event of a total loss settlement, payment will be made to the contract parties. It also includes the contract parties as additional insureds under the policy and stipulates that their coverage cannot be invalidated by acts of other parties. The endorsement defines key terms used such as the equipment covered, effective date, and contract parties included.
In simple and uncomplicated policy wordings, the customer information sheet of Optima Restore provide all policy details. It help the policy buyer or the policyholder to get familiar with what he/ she is covered for, the benefits offered by the plan, exclusions, renewal benefits, information about renewal benefits, renewal conditions and the claim procedure. Conditions related to cashless access must also be studied in detail. With no hidden clause Apollo Munich help you understand the policy coverage with genuine information to make the process transparent and simple for the customers. As per the policy variant the benefits offered will differ, thus it require a close study.
The information must be read in accordance to the policy document and policy brochures to obtain a clear idea about the related terms and conditions.
Federal Student Aid provides information about the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. The program forgives remaining loan balances for borrowers who make 120 monthly payments while working full-time for a qualifying public service employer. Eligible loans include Direct Loans and other federal student loans consolidated into the Direct Loan program. Borrowers must be enrolled in income-driven repayment plans and make payments for 10 years. Qualifying employment includes jobs with government agencies, non-profits, and other organizations providing public services. The first loan balances will be forgiven starting in October 2017 for those meeting the program requirements.
PhilHealth Benefits: National Health Insurance Program. Philippine Labor Law requires employers to contribute for the health insurance coverage of their employees through PhilHealth.
The document discusses various types of income that are exempt from federal income tax according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). It begins by explaining that the IRS allows individuals to claim personal exemptions for themselves and dependents to allow for a minimum amount of untaxed income for basic needs. It then provides examples of exempt income such as municipal bond income, retirement benefits, qualified Roth IRA distributions, and academic scholarships. The majority of the document then lists 18 specific items or types of income that are exempt from computing total taxable income according to the IRS tax code.
This document summarizes a professional indemnity insurance policy for chartered accountants, financial accountants, management consultants, lawyers, advocates, and solicitors.
The policy provides indemnity for legal liability to pay compensation for claims arising from negligent acts, errors, or omissions related to the insured's professional services. It covers claims made during the policy period for losses that occurred after the retroactive date. The limit of indemnity applies to each claim and in the aggregate. The policy outlines standard exclusions like dishonest acts, contractual liability, and war. It also provides conditions regarding claims notification, consent for settlements, subrogation, and cancellation.
Framework for Hispanic or Female Farmers' Claims ProcessRAFI-USA
Published 13 January, 2012.
DEADLINE EXTENDED: Claims must be submitted by May 1, 2013.
MORE INFORMATION: http://rafiusa.org/deadline-march-25th-usda-claims/
The United States Government has established a claims process to make available $1.33 billion or more to farmers or ranchers who allege discrimination by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in the denial of farm loan benefits based on being female or Hispanic. The exact time period covered by this claims process are as follows: Hispanic Farmers & Ranchers: Jan. 1, 1981 to Dec. 31, 1996 -or- Oct. 13, 1998 to Oct. 13, 2000. Female Farmers & Ranchers: Jan.1, 1981 to Dec. 31, 1996 -or- Oct. 19, 1998 to Oct. 19, 2000.
This document outlines health and welfare benefits for retirees of TriMet. It states that retirees must enroll in Medicare Parts A and B as soon as eligible and choose either Kaiser Permanente Senior Advantage or United Healthcare Group Medicare Advantage for supplemental coverage. Survivor benefits for spouses and dependents of retirees will continue for 11 years after the retiree's death. Employees who retire on or after a certain date will be eligible for single health coverage until age 65, with TriMet paying 50% of premium costs.
One Underwriting General & Products Liability Insurance Clubs and HotelsMatrix Insurance Brokers
This document provides the policy wording for a General and Products Liability Insurance policy arranged by One Underwriting Pty Ltd for clubs and hotels.
It outlines key sections of the policy including definitions, exclusions, conditions, limits of liability, and dispute resolution procedures. Important notices are also provided regarding duties of disclosure, privacy, and the Insurance Contracts Act.
The policy indemnifies the insured for legal liability for injury, property damage and advertising injury claims that arise from the insured's business operations, and provides defense costs in addition to the liability limit. Various extensions of coverage are also included.
W 2 Reporting Cost Of Employer Sponsored Health Coveragehaha7117
The document discusses the IRS requirements for employers to report the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored health coverage on employees' Form W-2s beginning in 2012. Key points include: (1) employers must determine applicable coverage provided, calculate costs for each employee, and report costs on Form W-2s; (2) certain types of coverage and small employers are exempt from reporting; and (3) employers must comply with detailed rules around calculating and reporting costs.
The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 1952 provides social security and monetary assistance to industrial employees and their families. The key aspects of the Act include:
1. It establishes provident funds, pension schemes and insurance schemes that provide retirement benefits like provident funds, superannuation pensions and family pensions.
2. It applies to establishments with 20 or more employees and some establishments with less than 20 upon request.
3. The Central Board of Trustees regulates the schemes and is composed of central and state government officials, employee and employer representatives.
4. It mandates a 12% contribution each from employer and employee wages to the provident fund and additional contributions to the pension
This document discusses rules regarding a potential premium surcharge that insurers may be required to assess policyholders following a catastrophic event. It specifies that the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association would determine if it has sufficient funds to pay obligations from public securities issued after a catastrophe. If funds are insufficient, the Association can request the Commissioner approve a premium surcharge of a specified percentage to be applied to various types of insurance policies covering property in catastrophe areas.
The NAIC & Center for Insurance Policy and Research have placed a special call for policy position briefs exploring the “potential development of a federal program to provide pandemic related business interruption coverage.”
The Centers for Better Insurance has submitted the attached short policy brief proposing the Payroll Risk Insurance Act.
The document proposes a Payroll Risk Insurance Act that would establish Payroll Risk Insurance Funds in each state. Key points:
- Each state could optionally establish a Payroll Risk Insurance Fund to provide payroll payments to businesses suspended by government order.
- The funds would be financed by assessments on commercial property insurers and overseen by state insurance regulators.
- The federal government would provide low-interest loans to reimburse funds for basic 4-week payroll coverage for small businesses. Much of the loans for small businesses would be forgiven.
- States would have flexibility to design more generous programs than the minimum federal standards but would need to finance any additional costs.
Reporting disclosure guide for employee benefit plansFPG Lynch
This document provides an overview of reporting and disclosure requirements for employee benefit plans under ERISA. It contains three chapters that outline basic disclosure requirements for pension and welfare benefit plans, additional requirements for welfare health plans and pension plans, and Form 5500 annual reporting requirements. The document is intended to help plan administrators understand their obligations to provide information to participants, beneficiaries, government agencies and others, such as summary plan descriptions, notices, and filings. It provides a high-level summary of the key documents required and timelines for distribution.
This document is a Steadfast General and Products Liability Insurance Policy that provides corporate liability solutions. It includes definitions of key terms, descriptions of what is covered and excluded, claims conditions, general conditions, and important information. Some of the main things covered are legal liability for bodily injury, property damage and advertising injury caused by or arising from the insured's business operations. Key exclusions include liability from aircraft, vehicles, asbestos, pollution, and products known to be exported to North America.
1) Planned Parenthood of Indiana filed a lawsuit challenging a new state law that prohibits state funding for any entity that performs abortions.
2) The law immediately canceled existing state contracts and grants with Planned Parenthood, including $1.36 million in Medicaid funding and $150,000 in disease intervention grants.
3) Planned Parenthood argues that the law will devastate its finances and force it to close health centers, eliminating services for thousands of patients. It is seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from taking effect.
Richard Adkerson, President and CEO of Freeport-McMoRan, sends a letter to the Secretary General of Indonesia's Ministry of Finance responding to the government's positions on divestment of Freeport's shares in its Indonesian subsidiary, PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI). Adkerson disagrees with several aspects of the government's proposal, including the valuation and timeframe of divestment. He maintains that any divestment must reflect fair value of PTFI through 2041 based on Freeport's contractual rights, and that Freeport will continue to abide by its Contract of Work while negotiations are ongoing.
Avn 67 c airline finance lease contract endorsementRidwan Ichsan
This document is an endorsement to an aircraft insurance policy to include additional parties. It provides that in the event of a total loss settlement, payment will be made to the contract parties. It also includes the contract parties as additional insureds under the policy and stipulates that their coverage cannot be invalidated by acts of other parties. The endorsement defines key terms used such as the equipment covered, effective date, and contract parties included.
In simple and uncomplicated policy wordings, the customer information sheet of Optima Restore provide all policy details. It help the policy buyer or the policyholder to get familiar with what he/ she is covered for, the benefits offered by the plan, exclusions, renewal benefits, information about renewal benefits, renewal conditions and the claim procedure. Conditions related to cashless access must also be studied in detail. With no hidden clause Apollo Munich help you understand the policy coverage with genuine information to make the process transparent and simple for the customers. As per the policy variant the benefits offered will differ, thus it require a close study.
The information must be read in accordance to the policy document and policy brochures to obtain a clear idea about the related terms and conditions.
Federal Student Aid provides information about the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. The program forgives remaining loan balances for borrowers who make 120 monthly payments while working full-time for a qualifying public service employer. Eligible loans include Direct Loans and other federal student loans consolidated into the Direct Loan program. Borrowers must be enrolled in income-driven repayment plans and make payments for 10 years. Qualifying employment includes jobs with government agencies, non-profits, and other organizations providing public services. The first loan balances will be forgiven starting in October 2017 for those meeting the program requirements.
PhilHealth Benefits: National Health Insurance Program. Philippine Labor Law requires employers to contribute for the health insurance coverage of their employees through PhilHealth.
The document discusses various types of income that are exempt from federal income tax according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). It begins by explaining that the IRS allows individuals to claim personal exemptions for themselves and dependents to allow for a minimum amount of untaxed income for basic needs. It then provides examples of exempt income such as municipal bond income, retirement benefits, qualified Roth IRA distributions, and academic scholarships. The majority of the document then lists 18 specific items or types of income that are exempt from computing total taxable income according to the IRS tax code.
This document summarizes a professional indemnity insurance policy for chartered accountants, financial accountants, management consultants, lawyers, advocates, and solicitors.
The policy provides indemnity for legal liability to pay compensation for claims arising from negligent acts, errors, or omissions related to the insured's professional services. It covers claims made during the policy period for losses that occurred after the retroactive date. The limit of indemnity applies to each claim and in the aggregate. The policy outlines standard exclusions like dishonest acts, contractual liability, and war. It also provides conditions regarding claims notification, consent for settlements, subrogation, and cancellation.
Framework for Hispanic or Female Farmers' Claims ProcessRAFI-USA
Published 13 January, 2012.
DEADLINE EXTENDED: Claims must be submitted by May 1, 2013.
MORE INFORMATION: http://rafiusa.org/deadline-march-25th-usda-claims/
The United States Government has established a claims process to make available $1.33 billion or more to farmers or ranchers who allege discrimination by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in the denial of farm loan benefits based on being female or Hispanic. The exact time period covered by this claims process are as follows: Hispanic Farmers & Ranchers: Jan. 1, 1981 to Dec. 31, 1996 -or- Oct. 13, 1998 to Oct. 13, 2000. Female Farmers & Ranchers: Jan.1, 1981 to Dec. 31, 1996 -or- Oct. 19, 1998 to Oct. 19, 2000.
This document outlines health and welfare benefits for retirees of TriMet. It states that retirees must enroll in Medicare Parts A and B as soon as eligible and choose either Kaiser Permanente Senior Advantage or United Healthcare Group Medicare Advantage for supplemental coverage. Survivor benefits for spouses and dependents of retirees will continue for 11 years after the retiree's death. Employees who retire on or after a certain date will be eligible for single health coverage until age 65, with TriMet paying 50% of premium costs.
One Underwriting General & Products Liability Insurance Clubs and HotelsMatrix Insurance Brokers
This document provides the policy wording for a General and Products Liability Insurance policy arranged by One Underwriting Pty Ltd for clubs and hotels.
It outlines key sections of the policy including definitions, exclusions, conditions, limits of liability, and dispute resolution procedures. Important notices are also provided regarding duties of disclosure, privacy, and the Insurance Contracts Act.
The policy indemnifies the insured for legal liability for injury, property damage and advertising injury claims that arise from the insured's business operations, and provides defense costs in addition to the liability limit. Various extensions of coverage are also included.
W 2 Reporting Cost Of Employer Sponsored Health Coveragehaha7117
The document discusses the IRS requirements for employers to report the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored health coverage on employees' Form W-2s beginning in 2012. Key points include: (1) employers must determine applicable coverage provided, calculate costs for each employee, and report costs on Form W-2s; (2) certain types of coverage and small employers are exempt from reporting; and (3) employers must comply with detailed rules around calculating and reporting costs.
The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 1952 provides social security and monetary assistance to industrial employees and their families. The key aspects of the Act include:
1. It establishes provident funds, pension schemes and insurance schemes that provide retirement benefits like provident funds, superannuation pensions and family pensions.
2. It applies to establishments with 20 or more employees and some establishments with less than 20 upon request.
3. The Central Board of Trustees regulates the schemes and is composed of central and state government officials, employee and employer representatives.
4. It mandates a 12% contribution each from employer and employee wages to the provident fund and additional contributions to the pension
This document discusses rules regarding a potential premium surcharge that insurers may be required to assess policyholders following a catastrophic event. It specifies that the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association would determine if it has sufficient funds to pay obligations from public securities issued after a catastrophe. If funds are insufficient, the Association can request the Commissioner approve a premium surcharge of a specified percentage to be applied to various types of insurance policies covering property in catastrophe areas.
The NAIC & Center for Insurance Policy and Research have placed a special call for policy position briefs exploring the “potential development of a federal program to provide pandemic related business interruption coverage.”
The Centers for Better Insurance has submitted the attached short policy brief proposing the Payroll Risk Insurance Act.
The document proposes a Payroll Risk Insurance Act that would establish Payroll Risk Insurance Funds in each state. Key points:
- Each state could optionally establish a Payroll Risk Insurance Fund to provide payroll payments to businesses suspended by government order.
- The funds would be financed by assessments on commercial property insurers and overseen by state insurance regulators.
- The federal government would provide low-interest loans to reimburse funds for basic 4-week payroll coverage for small businesses. Much of the loans for small businesses would be forgiven.
- States would have flexibility to design more generous programs than the minimum federal standards but would need to finance any additional costs.
INSURE Act - Summary and Analysis by Centers for Better InsuranceJasonSchupp1
This document provides a summary of the Incorporating National Support for Unprecedented Risks and Emergencies Act (INSURE Act) (H.R. 6944) introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff on January 10, 2024. The program would create a would create a catastrophic property loss reinsurance program.
Representative Carolyn Maloney (NY) recently announced the reintroduction of the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act. The first version of this proposal, introduced in May 2020, largely borrowed from the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act.
Business Continuity Protection ProgramJasonSchupp1
On May 21 the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC), the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), and the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America, Inc. (Big “I") released their proposal to address future pandemics: The Business Continuity Protection Program (BCPP).
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) tries to prevent double payments of policyholder and claimant losses under multiple federal disaster relief programs. When Treasury implemented TRIA’s double payment rules more than 15 years ago it assumed future disaster relief programs would look a lot like those previously rolled out for hurricanes, floods and earthquakes.
COVID-19 has shaken that assumption.
The document provides an overview of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India. Some key points:
- The Code aims to consolidate bankruptcy laws and establish time-bound insolvency resolution processes for companies, individuals, and partnerships.
- It allows for insolvency resolution and liquidation procedures for corporate debtors, individuals, and partnership firms.
- The Code defines financial creditors, operational creditors, and debt. It provides procedures for financial and operational creditors to initiate corporate insolvency resolution processes.
- The Code establishes the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India as the regulator overseeing insolvency professionals and information utilities.
The document outlines the Insurance Business Law of Myanmar. It establishes an Insurance Business Supervisory Board to oversee and regulate the insurance industry. The Board is tasked with licensing insurers, underwriters, and brokers and ensuring they follow principles of financial soundness, transparency, and protection of policyholders. The law aims to develop the insurance sector in Myanmar through increased private investment while maintaining oversight over operations and taking administrative action or pursuing penalties for any violations of its provisions.
Note on Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement...aarthianand
The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) allows banks and financial institutions to recover non-performing assets without court intervention through securitization, asset reconstruction, or enforcing security. The Act defines banks, financial institutions, secured creditors, and borrowers. To use SARFAESI powers, an institution must fall under the definition of a bank or financial institution, which includes certain public institutions and those notified by the central government. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs also provides guidelines for an institution to be declared a public financial institution.
Highlights from the 54th Annual Heckerling Institute on Estate PlanningFulcrum Partners LLC
Fulcrum Partners LLC is one of the largest executive benefits consultancies in the US with 13 nationwide offices and over $7B in assets under management. This document summarizes highlights from the 54th Annual Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning, including legal developments concerning life insurance trusts, considerations for migratory clients, and modern uses of grantor and non-grantor trusts to meet clients' evolving needs.
The attached analysis untangles the criteria for triggering Civil Authority Coverage and compares them to COVID-19 orders directed at non-essential businesses. It then measures business income and extra expense coverage against the terms of the new Payroll Protection Program.
The Amended Rules of Significant Beneficial ownership, 2019
Effective date : 08th February, 2019
MCA's step towards transparency of shareholding structures and help the government identify benami transactions and prevent money laundering activities.
#Sigificantbeneficialownershipamendedrules
Matthew Howard presented on micro captives and the 831(b) election. Key points include:
- The 831(b) election allows insurance companies with less than $1.2 million in annual premiums to pay $0 income tax on underwriting profits. Investment income is taxed as ordinary C-Corp income.
- A micro captive structure involves a business forming a captive insurance company that is owned by related entities. The business pays up to $1.2 million in annual premiums to the captive for various insurance policies.
- Benefits include the tax deductibility of premiums, taxation of underwriting profits at only the investment income level, and opportunities for retirement and estate planning using
On May 26, Representative Carolyn Maloney of New York introduced the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act of 2020 (HR 7011).
This proposal draws on the basic framework developed for the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. Although nearly two decades old, that program has never actually paid a claim. Accordingly, many of its design features remain (thankfully) untested.
This document is a promissory note and loan agreement between a lender (Missouri Development Finance Board) and borrower for a $25,000 loan at 3% interest to be repaid in quarterly installments. Key details include: the borrower will use the loan for the purposes stated in their application; the borrower provides collateral for the loan in the form of business assets and agrees to various covenants; events of default are outlined such as missing a payment or providing false information; and remedies for default include accelerating the loan and taking possession of collateral.
This comment letter focuses on the proposed rule changes under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program with respect to the outsized role captive insurers play in the Program and whether the Program should permit public identification of individual captive insurers.
Pandemic Heroes Compensation Act - Overview and Key RisksJasonSchupp1
The Pandemic Heroes Compensation Act (HR 6909) as introduced on May 15 draws heavily from the framework established for the September 11th Victims Compensation Fund. The main objective of the program is to efficiently deliver no-fault compensation to essential workers and their family members who have contracted COVID-19. This presentation provides an overview of the proposal and identifies key risks.
The document provides an overview of the initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in India. It explains that CIRP can be initiated by a financial creditor, operational creditor or the corporate debtor itself by filing an application to the adjudicating authority if there is a default. It outlines the eligibility criteria, process and documents required for an application filed by a financial creditor, operational creditor or corporate applicant. The CIRP must be completed within 180 days but can be extended if approved by 75% of the CoC voting shares.
This document is an ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance that commits Blank Title Insurance Company to issue an owner's or lender's title insurance policy. It includes schedules that identify the effective date, proposed insured, property address, requirements and exceptions. The commitment is subject to its terms, conditions and the company's liability is limited to the policy amount stated. It is not a representation of clear title but rather an agreement to provide title insurance for the proposed transaction.
Similar to Payroll Risk Insurance Act - Proposed Statutory Text (20)
FIO's 2022 Climate Data Call - CBI's CommentsJasonSchupp1
Executive Order 14030 (Climate Related Financial Risk) directs the Secretary of the Treasury to “direct the Federal Insurance Office to ... assess, in consultation with States, the potential for major disruptions of private insurance coverage in regions of the country particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts.”
FIO intends to collect data from the insurance industry in order to study the effect of climate-related catastrophes on insurance availability and affordability.
In the attached comments, CBI agrees with FIO’s intention to target its first data call on climate-related physical risks to homeowners or similar insurance. CBI makes a number of suggestions to improve this proposed data collection.
Alternatively, CBI proposes that an even more targeted data collection directed toward the insurance industry’s “relief value” mechanisms would allow FIO to gain far deeper insights into changes in availability and affordability over a longer period of time while collecting less data and data that is readily available from fewer respondents.
Climate Risk, Parametric Insurance, and Dodd-FrankJasonSchupp1
Parametric contracts may ultimately mature into an effective tool to assist U.S. businesses, nonprofits, local governments, and even families to manage risks relating to climate change. Before this product set can be trusted to deliver on that promise, parametric contracts must first be securely grounded in an appropriate regulatory framework.
Parametric contracts are undoubtedly swaps within the jurisdiction of the CFTC. The regulatory safe harbor CFTC granted to traditional insurance products only extends to state-regulated insurance policies indemnifying the policyholder to the extent of an actual, proven loss. This exception to the CFTC’s jurisdiction cannot reasonably stretch to encompass parametric contracts that promise a formulaic payout based on the parameters of an external event.
There is mounting evidence that Congress, state insurance regulators, consumers, and other stakeholders have embraced state regulation of parametric insurance contracts despite the clear jurisdictional mandate of the CFTC. For example, a bill currently pends before the U.S. House that would compel insurance companies to offer parametric pandemic insurance contracts regulated not by the CFTC but by state insurance regulators. Similarly, a recent federal Civil Innovation Grant awarded $1 million to pilot climate-related parametric insurance contracts provided to underserved communities in New York City.
Nothing prohibits an insurance company from offering parametric products so long as it complies with CFTC rules such as registration, data reporting, anti-money laundering protections, training and oversight of staff, and use registered brokers. In fact, compliant insurance companies and NFA registered insurance agents and brokers are well positioned to compete alongside other financial services sectors in a vibrant parametric contract market overseen by the CFTC.
The CFTC must either aggressively police its jurisdictional perimeter or expressly cede its authority over parametric contracts to insurance regulators. Until the CFTC speaks up, the potential for parametric contracts to contribute to the management of climate-related risk will profoundly underdeliver while consumers are marketed inefficient and legally dubious parametric insurance contracts.
CBI Comments on FATF Implementation of Corporate Transparency ActJasonSchupp1
Despite the IRS designation of certain captive arrangements in its “Dirty Dozen” of tax fraudsters and an increasingly intense IRS campaign scrutinizing alleged financial abuses by these entities, Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) does nothing to close or otherwise control the massive loophole in U.S. financial crime defenses created by an exemption of captive insurance companies from the Corporate Transparency Act.
CBI Comments on Treasury's TRIP Data Call for CaptivesJasonSchupp1
Every year the Federal Insurance Office (FIO), as administrator of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program, requires participating insurers to respond to a detailed data call.
Among other changes, FIO recently announced its intention to improve the data it collects from captive insurers. A captive is an insurance company that is owned by its policyholder. In many cases, a large corporation sets up a captive to manage retained risks, directly access reinsurance, and capture substantial tax advantages.
Many of these corporations also use captives to directly extract billions of dollars in benefits from government programs such as the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program and Federal Home Loan Bank system. In fact, prior data calls revealed that large corporations are expected to receive up to 95% of Terrorism Risk Insurance Program payouts through their captive insurers.
CBI has offered a number of practical suggestions to FIO to improve its data call templates and instructions. These suggestions, if adopted, would make it more likely captives will provide data that leads to useful insights for Congress and other stakeholders.
Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Company is the state’s residual market providing property insurance to homeowners and businesses that have been unable to procure insurance in the private market. Louisiana Citizens came out of the 2005 hurricane season nearly $1 billion in debt from Hurricane Katrina and Rita losses.
As reflected in the attached graphic, Louisiana Citizens appears to have transformed itself into a leaner, financially disciplined, and well governed organization. While it has yet to publish estimated losses from Hurricane Ida, there appears little chance of a similar financial hole opening in Louisiana Citizens’ balance sheet this year.
A graphic overview of this article is available here.
California Climate Insurance Working Group Sizes Up Parametric SolutionsJasonSchupp1
California’s Commissioner of Insurance convened a Working Group to explore the role innovative insurance solutions may be able to play in helping communities and families manage the risk of climate change. One of the Working Group’s recommendations is to promote parametric insurance. While traditional insurance indemnifies the policyholder for actual loss, parametric insurance pays out a pre-set amount if a disaster such as a flood, wildfire or heat wave exceeds specified parameters.
There is just one hitch: Parametric insurance is not insurance. After the 2008 financial crisis, Congress enacted Dodd-Frank to, among other things, sweep parametric and other event contracts under the jurisdiction of the Commodities Futures Exchange Commission (CFTC). The Working Group is right to highlight the potential for parametric solutions to become an effective risk management tool, but it must invite the CFTC to join in the discussion if it hopes to move its recommendations toward reality.
This paper examines the broad net Congress cast to capture event contracts under the Commodities Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) jurisdiction and the exclusion the CFTC crafted allowing traditional indemnity-based insurance to remain within the jurisdiction of state insurance regulation.
2021 tria small insurer study commentsJasonSchupp1
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act requires the Federal Insurance Office (FIO) to conduct a study of the program’s impact on small insurers. We have suggested FIO focus its upcoming report on two heighten program risks facing small insurers:
• Compliance with the separate line-item disclosure of terrorism premium; and
• A disproportionate burden of post-event policyholder surcharges.
CBI Comments to FinCEN on Beneficial Ownership of CpativesJasonSchupp1
In response to this ANPR, CBI draws FinCEN’s attention to how U.S. domiciled captive insurance companies may interact with the provisions and intent of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).
CBI Comments on TRIA - Certification ProcessJasonSchupp1
Centers for Better Insurance urges Treasury to decline to open the door to a formal petitioning procedure. The U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment already allows any interested person to bring to the Secretary of Treasury’s attention an event the person believes should or should not be subject to certification. Nothing in the Program’s existing rules abridges that right.
The Centers for Better Insurance submitted comments on whether cyber incidents occurring outside the US but impacting the US could be eligible for certification under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program. The document analyzes the statutory requirements that an act must result in damage within the US in order to be certified. It concludes that if all that occurs in the US are non-damage impacts such as economic losses, the act could not be certified, as both the damage and insured loss must take place domestically. Weighing in further could inadvertently impact pending COVID-19 business interruption claims testing similar damage trigger issues.
CBI Comments on Proposed TRIA Regulatory DefinitionsJasonSchupp1
This comment letter focuses on the proposed rule changes for the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act regulations with respect to the definitions of:
• Act of terrorism; and
• Insured loss
in accordance with Treasury’s Notice appearing at 85 FR 71588 (November 10, 2020).
Summary of NAIC COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage Data CallJasonSchupp1
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) issued a COVID-19 business interruption data call on behalf of all state departments of insurance except New York and New Mexico.
CBI’s Statement on PRIA to Congressional SubcommitteeJasonSchupp1
The House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Housing, Community Development and Insurance will hold a hearing on Thursday November 19, 2020 entitled Insuring Against a Pandemic: Challenges and Solutions for Policyholders and Insurers. The hearing is expected to focus on the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act (HR 7011) introduced in May by Representative Maloney of New York.
The Centers for Better Insurance is submitting the attached Statement for the Record which warns this well-intended legislation (as well as the excess program in the joint industry Business Continuity Protection Program) would:
• Leave small businesses, nonprofits, and local governments in no better position during future pandemics than they are today as they struggle to survive COVID-19 lockdown orders while battling their insurance companies in court; and
• Grant large corporations license to design their own multi-billion-dollar taxpayer funded pandemic bailouts free from Congressional oversight, U.S. Treasury supervision, and public scrutiny.
PRIA is based on the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) thereby adopting and amplifying its two greatest shortcomings:
• PRIA would remove only the “virus exclusion” from small business insurance policies. More than 80% of court cases dismissing small business claims for COVID-19 business interruption so far have been based on a lack of “direct physical loss or damage” – not the virus exclusion alone. PRIA is no more than a ticket for small businesses, nonprofits, and local governments to head back to court to litigate whether a virus can cause property damage as their businesses crumple under the weight of future pandemic lockdown orders.
• PRIA would allow large corporations to set up their own personal insurance companies (known as “captives”) offering their owners generous pandemic coverages with 95% of the cost transferred to the American taxpayer. According to U.S. Treasury, up to 95 cents of every dollar paid out under TRIA following a future terrorist attack would pass through captives on the way to the coffers of large corporations. No doubt large corporations would likewise siphon off the lion’s share PRIA’s payouts through these secretive special purpose vehicles.
The American taxpayer in on the hook for “only” 80% of the $100 billion TRIA program. Perhaps continued tolerance of that program’s well-known defects is somehow justifiable. However, there can be no justification to replicate these defects and extrapolate them into a taxpayer liability for 95% of a $750 billion program.
COVID-19 Business Interruption Rulings as of Oct 30 2020JasonSchupp1
What COVID-19 Business Interruption Litigation Can Tell Us About How the Pandemic Risk Insurance Act (PRIA) Would Work (Or Not Work) for Small Businesses
PRIA would make sure small businesses could buy business income coverage without a virus exclusion – but that does not mean they would be covered for the next pandemic.
WEF2020 Regional Risks – Are Small Businesses Covered?JasonSchupp1
Each year in preparation for its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, the World Economic Forum (WEF) polls more than 10,000 business leaders from around the world on their perceptions of the top global risks for doing business.
The WEF’s Regional Risks for Doing Business report ranks responses to its Executive Opinion Survey conducted between January and July of this year.
The Insurance Compliance Function - International Standards JasonSchupp1
The document discusses standards from the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) regarding insurance company compliance functions. It outlines that compliance functions are responsible for identifying legal/regulatory obligations, assessing compliance risks, and monitoring/reporting on compliance. It also discusses requirements for independence of compliance, training/awareness, investigations of breaches, and regular compliance reporting to management and boards.
California established the $21 billion Wildfire Fund last year to finance third party liability claims arising from wildfires caused by electrical transmission wires and equipment operated by the state’s three largest investor-owned utilities.
The attached presentation explores:
• How the Wildfire Fund is funded;
• How the Wildfire Fund encourages utilities to make wildfire safety a top priority; and
• How the Wildfire Fund is used to settle claims.
The California Wildfire Fund spreads and smooths the potential cost of more than $20 billion in future wildfire claims across the state’s three largest investor owned utilities, the customers of those utilities and, to a certain extent, homeowners insurers. In doing so, the scheme firmly guides California’s major utilities toward an aggressive commitment to wildfire safety through:
• A mandatory $5 billion shareholder funded investment in risk mitigation;
• Submission of annual risk mitigation plans;
• Standards for safety culture, governance, and executive compensation;
• Additional financial obligations to the Wildfire fund for imprudent actions causing losses; and
• Mandatory liability insurance.
Several insights into U.S. business interruption coverage litigation can be gleaned from the outcome of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s test case.
On September 15, the UK High Court issued a ruling involving business interruption claims against 21 representative policies issued by 8 insurers. The ruling is a mixed bag for UK policyholders and insurers. For their U.S. counterparts, the decision provides only a few relevant insights.
While the 165-page opinion digs into the unique wording of each of the 21 policies, the fundamental theme running through the insurers’ defense was that the policies only covered localized outbreaks not global pandemics. The insurers generally lost that argument with respect to the policies containing Disease Coverage and generally prevailed with respect to policies containing only Prevention of Access / Public Authority Coverage.
These are not the points driving U.S. policyholders and insurers into court. U.S. business interruption disputes so far have turned on two key policy features. First, U.S. business interruption coverages (including coverage extensions such as civil authority coverage) almost always require property damage to trigger a payout. For standard business income coverage, the property damage must be at the insured location. For civil authority coverage, the property damage must be away from but within a certain distance of the insured location. Second, all but two COVID-19 court rulings in the U.S. have involved policies with virus exclusions.
The UK court did not address either the question of property damage or the applicability of a virus exclusion. In fact, the policies at issue in the UK case contained “non-damage” coverages specifically encompassing business interruption losses resulting from the outbreak of disease.
UK Public Authority Coverage is somewhat similar in nature to civil authority coverage available in the U.S. The attached presentation looks for reasoning within the UK court’s decision that could be applied to interpret similar wording in the U.S., including whether:
• Governmental guidance or recommendations amounts to an “action of civil authority”;
• Stay at home orders “prohibit access” to an insured location;
• The “area immediately surrounding” the insured location includes the entire state; and
• The insured location is “not more than one mile” from the property damage where similar property damage exists outside of that radius.
These are important but nitty-gritty questions that will only need to be answered for civil authority claims that make it past the “property damage” hurdle and any virus exclusion attached to the policy.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Payroll Risk Insurance Act - Proposed Statutory Text
1. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page1
PAYROLL RISK INSURANCE ACT
Sec. 1. Congressional findings and purpose
Sec. 2. Definitions.
Sec. 3. Payroll risk insurance program.
Sec. 4. General authority and administration of program.
Sec. 5. Preservation provisions.
SEC. 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND PURPOSE
(a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
(1) it may be necessary for a State to issue an order effectively mandating
the suspension or significant curtailment of business operations in
the State or a part of the State for the purposes of preventing,
mitigating or recovering from widespread loss of life, impairment of
health, damage to property or damage to infrastructure resulting
from a local, regional or national disaster;
(2) the continuation of payroll, rent, mortgage interest payments and
utilities payments are essential to sustain workers and businesses
during the term of such an order and to the effective and efficient
restart of economic activity following the termination of the order;
(3) the market for small and medium sized businesses, nonprofits and
others to obtain business income insurance covering the cost of
continuing expenses such as payroll, rent, mortgage interest and
utilities during the suspension or significant curtailment of business
operations to comply with such an order is limited and not expected
to develop significantly;
(4) the decision whether to issue, continue or terminate such an order is
primarily that of the States and therefore a State should have
considerable responsibility and flexibility with respect to the
mitigation of the economic impact of the order on the economy,
businesses and workers of the State;
(5) the commercial property insurance industry maintains extensive
catastrophe claims management and other capabilities allowing it to
quickly and efficiently distribute financial relief to businesses during
a crisis; and
Centers for
Better Insurance
Policyholders
Employees
Shareholders
Society
www.betterins.orgSupporting value creation for all stakeholders through
beneficial purpose, sound governance and effective controls CBI
2. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page2
(6) the United States Government should provide support to the States
in the form of reducible loans to State-sponsored nonprofit entities
capable of levying assessments on premium and pooling risks among
commercial property insurance companies with respect to insurance
on risks in the State in order to provide a defined period of support
to businesses and nonprofits through payments for certain
continuing expenses including payroll.
(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this title is to establish a Federal program that
provides for a voluntary system through which States retain responsibility
and flexibility to mitigate the economic impact of State orders effectively
suspending business activity on a widespread basis in response to a disaster
that-
(1) utilizes the capabilities of the commercial property insurance
industry;
(2) provides businesses and nonprofits with the certainty of a defined
period of coverage of continuing expenses including payroll; and
(3) relies on the regulatory oversight and financial resources of the
United States Government.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
(a) AFFILIATE.—The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means, with respect to a covered
policyholder, any person that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with the covered policyholder.
(b) CERTIFIED ORDER.—
(1) The term “certified order” means any order that is certified by the
Secretary under the Program to—
(A) be an order issued by or under the authority of a State;
(B) have been submitted by the State for certification under
this paragraph;
(C) have been issued for the purposes of preventing, mitigating
or recovering from widespread loss of life, impairment of
health, damage to property or damage to infrastructure
resulting from a local, regional or national disaster;
3. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page3
(D) effectively require the suspension or significant curtailment
of business operations of covered policyholders within the
State or a substantial part of the State;
(E) be in the compelling national economic interest to certify
under this paragraph; and
(F) satisfy such other conditions as the Secretary may establish
by regulation.
(2) The Secretary shall publish notice of certification in the Federal
Register specifying the State, the order being certified, and the
effective date of the order with respect to the effect on business
operations described in clause (b)(1)(D) of this section.
(3) Any certification of, or determination not to certify, an order under
this paragraph shall be final, and shall not be subject to judicial
review.
(4) The Secretary may not delegate or designate to any other officer,
employee, or person, any determination whether to certify an order
under this paragraph.
(c) COVERED PAYROLL RISK PAYMENT.— The term ‘‘covered payroll risk
payment’’ means one or more payments to a covered policyholder totaling
an amount not to exceed the sum of four weeks of the cover policyholder’s
incurred continuing expenses for payroll, rent, mortgage interest and
utilities commencing on the effective date of the certified order and subject
to-
(1) a maximum amount of $5,ooo,ooo to any one covered policyholder
(including its affiliates);
(2) the rules of the participating fund; and
(3) the regulations established by the Secretary.
(d) COVERED POLICYHOLDER.— The term “covered policyholder” means a
person that on the effective date of a certified order is:
(1) insured by a policy of primary commercial property insurance issued
by a Member and covering a workplace in the State from which the
certified order issued; and
4. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page4
(2) satisfies the criteria for covered policyholders established under the
rules of the participating fund.
(e) MEMBER OF THE FUND.—The term ‘‘member of the fund’’ means any
entity that is a member of the participating fund of a State because it is:
(1) licensed or admitted to engage in the business of providing primary
commercial property insurance in the State;
(2) an authorized surplus lines insurer in the State insuring risks of
primary commercial insurance in the State;
(3) a residual market insurance entity of the State; or
(4) any other entity to the extent provided in the rules of the Secretary.
(f) PARTICIPATING FUND.— The term “participating fund” means a Payroll
Risk Insurance Fund-
(1) Established by a State that has elected to participate in the Program;
and
(2) Has been approved by the Secretary for participation in the Program
in accordance with Section 3(b).
(g) PERSON.— The term ‘‘person’’ means any individual, business or nonprofit
entity (including those organized in the form of a partnership, limited
liability company, corporation, or association), trust or estate, or a State or
political subdivision of a State or other governmental unit.
(h) PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Program’’ means the Payroll Risk Insurance
Program established by this title.
(i) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Treasury.
(j) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means any State of the United States, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa,
Guam, each of the United States Virgin Islands, and any territory or
possession of the United States.
5. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page5
SEC. 3. PAYROLL RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the Department of the
Treasury the Payroll Risk Insurance Program.
(2) AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of State or Federal law, the Secretary shall administer the
Program, and shall extend loans to participating funds in accordance
with this section.
(3) VOLUNTARY PARTICIPATION.—Each State may designate one
payroll risk insurance fund meeting the eligibility requirements
established by the Secretary in accordance with subsection (b) to
participate in Program for a period of ten consecutive years with the
option to continue participation for additional periods of ten
consecutive years unless:
(A) the program has terminated; or
(B) the Secretary has declined to approve or withdrawn the
approval of the payroll risk insurance fund for participation
in the Program.
(b) APPROVAL FOR PARTICIPATION. —A non-profit entity established by a
State and designated by the State for participation may apply to the
Secretary for participation in the Program. The Secretary shall issue
regulations establishing the procedures for application and criteria for
approval for participation in the Program. The criteria for approval for
participation in the Program shall include satisfactory evidence of—
(1) Principles, structures and frameworks ensuring sound governance
with respect to the decisions, operations and finances of the
participating fund;
(2) Mechanisms to ensure transparency to the Secretary, members, the
public and other stakeholders with respect to the decisions,
operations and finances of the participating fund;
(3) Mechanisms for the solicitation and consideration of input from the
Secretary, members, the public and other stakeholders with respect
to the decisions, operations and finances of the participating fund;
(4) Procedures for the selection of members of the board or other body
overseeing the decisions, operations and finances of the participating
fund that ensure representation from appropriate stakeholders
6. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page6
including employees, businesses, nonprofits, members and
insurance intermediaries;
(5) Arrangements for adequate regulation and supervision of the
participating fund and its members by the State commissioner of
insurance or other appropriate official of the State; and
(6) Rules for the calculation of covered payroll risk payments that-
(A) Favor expeditious determination and payment;
(B) Approximate the actual amounts of loss;
(C) Cap or eliminate claims for excessive compensation and
expense; and
(D) Control fraud and waste.
(c) REVIEW OF APPROVED STATUS – The Secretary shall request
confirmation annually from a participating fund that it has continues to
operate in compliance with the eligibility criteria in accordance with
subsection (b) or, if such confirmation cannot be given, an explanation of
deviations and plans to remediate those deviations.
(1) The Secretary may suspend the approval for participation by a
payroll risk insurance fund until satisfactory evidence of remediation
of any deviations from the eligibility criteria (whether reported by the
participating fund or otherwise discovered).
(2) The Secretary may withdraw the approval for participation by a
payroll risk insurance fund in the absence of satisfactory evidence of
remediation of any deviations from the eligibility criteria (whether
reported by the participating fund or otherwise discovered) in which
case the payroll risk insurance fund may reapply for participation in
12 months.
(d) CONDITIONS FOR LOAN—No loan may be made to a participating fund
by the Secretary under this section unless—
(1) The Secretary has certified an order of the State of the participating
fund;
(2) The members of the participating fund are obligated by State law to
make covered payroll risk payments to covered policyholders;
7. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page7
(3) The participating fund is obligated by State law to reimburse, in
whole or in part, covered payroll risk payments made by its
members;
(4) The participating fund has requested a loan from Treasury in the
amount equal to the reimbursable covered payroll risk payments
made or to be made in accordance with subsection (d)(3); and
(5) The request for a loan is made in a form and manner established by
the Secretary by regulation.
(e) LOAN— Upon approval of a request made in accordance with subsection
(d), the Secretary shall make a loan to a participating fund in an amount
equal to the reimbursable covered payroll risk payments made by its
members. The loan shall have a duration of 10 years with no payment
required during the first 12 months and carry a rate of interest set by the
Secretary but not exceeding 1 percent per annum.
(f) LOAN FORGIVENESS—
(1) The Secretary shall immediately reduce the obligation of a
participating fund to repay a portion of loan made in accordance with
subsection (d) by—
(A)90% of reimbursable covered payroll risk payments paid to
any covered policyholder who, together with its affiliates, had
no more than 500 full time and part time employees on the
effective date of the certified order;
(B)90% of reimbursable covered payroll risk payments paid to
any covered policyholder who was an independent contractor,
self-employed individual or sole proprietor on the effective
date of the certified order;
(C)50% of reimbursable covered payroll risk payments paid to
any covered policyholder who had more than 500 but less
than 5000 full time and part time employees on the effective
date of the certified order; and
(D)10% of reimbursable covered payroll risk payments paid to
any covered policyholder who had more than 5000 full time
and part time employees on the effective date of the certified
order.
8. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page8
(2) The Secretary may reduce or eliminate the forgiveness otherwise
granted in accordance with subsection (f)(1) if the Secretary finds the
participating fund had materially failed to:
(A)comply with the rules, regulations and guidelines of the
program;
(B)implement and maintain the criteria for eligibility in
accordance with subsection (b);
(C)monitor, audit and verify the payments made by its members
and claims for reimbursement from the participating fund; or
(D) defaulted on its obligations with respect to the loan.
(g) ANNUAL ASSESSMENT— As a condition of continued eligibility for
participation in the program, each participating fund shall levy an annual
assessment on commercial property insurance premium written on risks in
the State of no less than 0.5% or such greater amount as the participating
fund determines is adequate to:
(1) Finance the operating expense of the participating fund;
(2) Raise awareness of the program with members and covered
policyholders;
(3) Establish standards, monitor compliance with those standards and
conduct testing and training with respect to the preparedness of
members to perform in accordance with the program; and
(4) Finance any loan granted pursuant to the program.
SEC. 4. GENERAL AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE PROGRAM.
(a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall have the powers and
authorities necessary to carry out the Program, including authority—
(1) to investigate and audit all requests for loans under the Program; and
(2) to prescribe regulations and procedures to effectively administer and
implement the Program, and to ensure that all participating funds
are treated comparably under the Program.
(b) INTERIM RULES AND PROCEDURES.—The Secretary may issue interim
final rules or procedures specifying the manner in which—
9. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page9
(1) Application may be made for participation in the Program;
(2) Orders may be certified under the Program; and
(3) Participating funds may request loans under the Program.
(c) CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES.—The Secretary may employ persons or
contract for services as may be necessary to implement the Program.
(d) FUNDING.—
(1) FEDERAL PAYMENTS.—There are hereby appropriated, out of
funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may
be necessary to make and forgive loans under the Program.
(2) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—There are hereby appropriated,
out of funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums
as may be necessary to pay reasonable costs of administering the
Program.
(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall notify the Congress if a
certified order is expected to continue in force for longer than 4 weeks. The
notice shall contain information with respect to-
(1) the expected duration of the certified order;
(2) the amount of the loan request from the participating fund; and
(3) the amount the reduction of the loan.
(f) REPORTS.— Not later than June 30, 2022 and every other June 30
thereafter, the Secretary shall submit a report to the Committee on
Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate that includes—
(1) an analysis of the overall effectiveness of the Program;
(2) an evaluation of whether any aspects of the Program have the effect
of discouraging or impeding insurers from providing commercial
property insurance including coverage for business income and extra
expense;
(3) an assessment of the governance, transparency, stakeholder
engagement and financial position of participating funds.
10. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page10
SEC. 5. PRESERVATION PROVISIONS.
(a) Nothing in this title shall affect the jurisdiction or regulatory authority of
the insurance commissioner (or any agency or office performing like
functions) of any State over any insurer or other person except as
specifically provided in this title.
(1) During the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and
for so long as the Program is in effect, books and records of any
participating fund or any member that are relevant to the Program
shall be provided, or caused to be provided, to the Secretary, upon
request by the Secretary, notwithstanding any provision of the laws
of any State prohibiting or limiting such access.
(2) The Secretary may recover any loan amounts in default from the
guaranty fund or similar mechanism of the State of a participating
fund.
(b) Nothing in this title shall prohibit a participating fund to-
(1) Levy an assessment on premium in addition to that specified in
Section 3(f);
(2) Levy an assessment in an amount greater than that specified in
Section 3(f);
(3) Levy assessments in differing amounts based on line of business,
size of policyholder or other criteria;
(4) Purchase reinsurance or enter into other risk transfer arrangements
with respect to the obligations of the participating fund;
(5) Coordinate the obligation of a member to make covered payroll risk
payments with any otherwise applicable business income insurance;
and
(6) Reimburse its members for payments other than covered payroll risk
payments, provided that no such reimbursements shall be included
in any application for a loan or considered in the reduction of a loan
under the Program, including-
(A)payroll risk payments in excess of the maximum limit of time
or amount of covered payroll risk payments; and
(B)risk payments for elements not included within covered
payroll risk payments such as lost profits, extra expense and
excess compensation.
11. CBI-PAN-20-08 Version 1.0 www.betterins.org
Page11
(c) Nothing in this title shall prohibit the insurance commissioner (or any
agency or office performing like functions) from-
(1) Approving, disapproving or otherwise reviewing any rate charged to
policyholders with respect to covered payroll risk payments;
(2) Approving, disapproving or otherwise reviewing any form
describing covered payroll risk payments, the rights of covered
policyholders or the obligations of a participating fund and its
members;
(3) Approving, disapproving or otherwise reviewing any rate or form
regarding any insurance coverages for payments described in
subsection (b)(6); and
(4) Approving, disapproving or otherwise reviewing any rate or form
providing, limiting or excluding business income and extra expense
insurance including-
(A) an exclusion of coverage for business income losses
resulting from a certified order;
(B) a limitation of coverage for business income losses
resulting from a certified order; and
(C) coordination of coverage for business income losses
resulting from a certified order with covered payroll risk
payments.