The document discusses the compatibility of intellectualism and education. It argues that the current school grading system limits students' intellectual growth by narrowing their minds. A professor named Gerald Graff proposes assigning interesting magazines to students to get them reading and engaging in debates as a way to develop useful skills and motivate them for more challenging literature later on. However, others disagree, arguing that magazines use simple vocabulary and that exposing children to real-world competition could harm their self-expression. While grades may not reflect intelligence, "book smart" students work hard to satisfy their intellectual thirst through academic success. Overall, the school system faces challenges in balancing education and intellectualism but teachers are working to assess problems and improve the system.
A discussion document from Through the Magic Door to frame the issue of disengaged readers, identify the stakeholders for improving self-motivate and self-supported reading, and providing a foundation for identifying what can be done to address the issue.
Science & Arts Academy
1825 Miner Street
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
847-827-7880
http://www.scienceandartsacademy.org
Science & Arts Academy is an independent, non-denominational, co-educational, not-for-profit day school for gifted students in Junior Kindergarten through eighth grade.
Science & Arts Academy
1825 Miner Street
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
847-827-7880
http://www.scienceandartsacademy.org
Science & Arts Academy is an independent, non-denominational, co-educational, not-for-profit day school for gifted students in Junior Kindergarten through eighth grade.
White Paper: The Essential Characteristics of a Boy-Friendly Learning Environ...Jack Purdom
An often overlooked issue in today’s schools is the dire state of boys’ education. Research shows that institutions are failing to engage male students, and the outcome couldn’t be any clearer. Across all age, ethnicity, and economic demographics in the US, boys consistently account for the overwhelming majority of disciplinary referrals, failing grades, and ADHD diagnoses. While boys are as capable of learning classroom material as well as girls are, they are often not given the support they need to learn effectively. Fortunately, studies have also pointed us toward the environments that boys learn in best. The following white paper describes some key features of a boy-friendly learning environment.
A discussion document from Through the Magic Door to frame the issue of disengaged readers, identify the stakeholders for improving self-motivate and self-supported reading, and providing a foundation for identifying what can be done to address the issue.
Science & Arts Academy
1825 Miner Street
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
847-827-7880
http://www.scienceandartsacademy.org
Science & Arts Academy is an independent, non-denominational, co-educational, not-for-profit day school for gifted students in Junior Kindergarten through eighth grade.
Science & Arts Academy
1825 Miner Street
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
847-827-7880
http://www.scienceandartsacademy.org
Science & Arts Academy is an independent, non-denominational, co-educational, not-for-profit day school for gifted students in Junior Kindergarten through eighth grade.
White Paper: The Essential Characteristics of a Boy-Friendly Learning Environ...Jack Purdom
An often overlooked issue in today’s schools is the dire state of boys’ education. Research shows that institutions are failing to engage male students, and the outcome couldn’t be any clearer. Across all age, ethnicity, and economic demographics in the US, boys consistently account for the overwhelming majority of disciplinary referrals, failing grades, and ADHD diagnoses. While boys are as capable of learning classroom material as well as girls are, they are often not given the support they need to learn effectively. Fortunately, studies have also pointed us toward the environments that boys learn in best. The following white paper describes some key features of a boy-friendly learning environment.
Against Scaffolding: Radical Openness and Critical Digital PedagogyJesse Stommel
Keynote at WILU2019, The Workshop for Instruction in Library Use
Scaffolding can create points of entry and access but can also reduce the complexity of learning to its detriment. And too often we build learning environments in advance of students arriving upon the scene. We design syllabi, assemble content, predetermine outcomes, and craft assessments before having met our students. We reduce students to data. And learning to input and output.
Radical openness isn't a bureaucratic gesture, isn't linear, offers infinite points of entry. It has to be rooted in a willingness to sit with discomfort. Radical openness demands educational institutions be spaces for relationships and dialogue. bell hooks writes, “for me this place of radical openness is a margin—a profound edge. Locating oneself there is difficult yet necessary. It is not a 'safe' place. One is always at risk. One needs a community of resistance.” For hooks, the risks we take are personal, professional, political. When she says that “radical openness is a margin,” she suggests it is a place of emergent outcomes, a place of friction, a place of critical thinking.
How do children learn? How are they taught? These are two fundamental questions in education. Caleb Gattegno provides a direct and lucid analysis, and concludes that much current teaching, far from feeding and developing the learning process, actually stifles it. Memory, for instance, the weakest of the mental powers available for intelligent use, is almost the only faculty to be exploited in the educational system, and holds little value in preparing a student for the future. Gattegno’s answer is to show how learning and teaching can properly work together, what schools should achieve, and what parents have a right to expect.
THE NEA HIGHER EDUCATION JOURNAL 27Few things are more d.docxdennisa15
THE NEA HIGHER EDUCATION JOURNAL | 27
Few things are more difficult than to see outside the bounds of your
own perspective—to be able to identify assumptions that you take as uni-
versal truths but which, instead, have been crafted by your own unique
identity and experiences in the world. We live much of our lives in our
own heads, in a reconfirming dialogue with ourselves. Even when we dis-
cuss crucial issues with others, much of the dialogue is not dialogue: it is
monologue where we work to convince others to understand us or to
adopt our view.
HOW DOES YOUR
POSITIONALITY BIAS YOUR
EPISTEMOLOGY?
by David Takacs
H
ow does your positionality bias your epistemology? I’ve
been asking this question to students, weaving it as a
theme throughout my courses. Of course, a resounding
chorus of bafflement greets the initial question. What I’m asking
is: How does who you are shape what you know about the world?
I think this is one of the most important questions one can ask
during an undergraduate education, and a student’s search for
answers may open up new possibilities for understanding her con-
nections to the world. As a reflective practitioner of the teaching
profession, I constantly grapple with these questions, as well.
David Takacs is an associate professor in the Department of Earth Systems Science &
Policy at California State University Monterey Bay, where he teaches courses in the envi-
ronmental humanities. He is the author of The Idea of Biodiversity.
28 | Thought & Action SUMMER 2003
Simply acknowledging that one’s views are not inevitable—that one’s
positionality can bias one’s epistemology—is itself a leap for many peo-
ple, one that can help make us more open to the world’s possibilities.
When we develop the skill of understanding how we know what we
know, we acquire a key to lifelong learning. When we teach this skill, we
help students sample the rigors and delights of the examined life. When
we ask students to learn to think for themselves and to understand them-
selves as thinkers—rather than telling them what to think and have them
recite it back—we help foster habits
of introspection, analysis, and open,
joyous communication.
Unfortunately, many studentscome to college without some
of the skills they need to succeed in
academic work. In California, the
richest state in the richest country the
world has ever known, we skulk in
the bottom fifth among states in per
capita spending on education. The
state system has shortchanged many
students who live in poorer school
districts. Crammed into overcrowded classrooms, led by underpaid teach-
ers who labor in crumbling infrastructure, many students do not get the
quality education they deserve. To compound this misfortune, some col-
lege administrators and professors view these students—often poor, often
minority, sometimes bilingual—as “deficits.” These students pose prob-
lems for our teaching; we have to spend lots of money to “compensate”
for their “deficiencies.”
.
A joint keynote with Sean Michael Morris at the Dream 2019 conference in Long Beach, California.
It is urgent we have teachers, it is urgent we employ them, pay them, support them with adequate resources; but it is also urgency which defines the project of teaching. In a political climate increasingly defined by its obstinacy, anti-intellectualism, and deflection of fact and care; in a society still divided across lines of race, nationality, religion, gender, sexuality, income, ability, and privilege, teaching has an important (urgent) role to play.
Against Scaffolding: Radical Openness and Critical Digital PedagogyJesse Stommel
Keynote at WILU2019, The Workshop for Instruction in Library Use
Scaffolding can create points of entry and access but can also reduce the complexity of learning to its detriment. And too often we build learning environments in advance of students arriving upon the scene. We design syllabi, assemble content, predetermine outcomes, and craft assessments before having met our students. We reduce students to data. And learning to input and output.
Radical openness isn't a bureaucratic gesture, isn't linear, offers infinite points of entry. It has to be rooted in a willingness to sit with discomfort. Radical openness demands educational institutions be spaces for relationships and dialogue. bell hooks writes, “for me this place of radical openness is a margin—a profound edge. Locating oneself there is difficult yet necessary. It is not a 'safe' place. One is always at risk. One needs a community of resistance.” For hooks, the risks we take are personal, professional, political. When she says that “radical openness is a margin,” she suggests it is a place of emergent outcomes, a place of friction, a place of critical thinking.
How do children learn? How are they taught? These are two fundamental questions in education. Caleb Gattegno provides a direct and lucid analysis, and concludes that much current teaching, far from feeding and developing the learning process, actually stifles it. Memory, for instance, the weakest of the mental powers available for intelligent use, is almost the only faculty to be exploited in the educational system, and holds little value in preparing a student for the future. Gattegno’s answer is to show how learning and teaching can properly work together, what schools should achieve, and what parents have a right to expect.
THE NEA HIGHER EDUCATION JOURNAL 27Few things are more d.docxdennisa15
THE NEA HIGHER EDUCATION JOURNAL | 27
Few things are more difficult than to see outside the bounds of your
own perspective—to be able to identify assumptions that you take as uni-
versal truths but which, instead, have been crafted by your own unique
identity and experiences in the world. We live much of our lives in our
own heads, in a reconfirming dialogue with ourselves. Even when we dis-
cuss crucial issues with others, much of the dialogue is not dialogue: it is
monologue where we work to convince others to understand us or to
adopt our view.
HOW DOES YOUR
POSITIONALITY BIAS YOUR
EPISTEMOLOGY?
by David Takacs
H
ow does your positionality bias your epistemology? I’ve
been asking this question to students, weaving it as a
theme throughout my courses. Of course, a resounding
chorus of bafflement greets the initial question. What I’m asking
is: How does who you are shape what you know about the world?
I think this is one of the most important questions one can ask
during an undergraduate education, and a student’s search for
answers may open up new possibilities for understanding her con-
nections to the world. As a reflective practitioner of the teaching
profession, I constantly grapple with these questions, as well.
David Takacs is an associate professor in the Department of Earth Systems Science &
Policy at California State University Monterey Bay, where he teaches courses in the envi-
ronmental humanities. He is the author of The Idea of Biodiversity.
28 | Thought & Action SUMMER 2003
Simply acknowledging that one’s views are not inevitable—that one’s
positionality can bias one’s epistemology—is itself a leap for many peo-
ple, one that can help make us more open to the world’s possibilities.
When we develop the skill of understanding how we know what we
know, we acquire a key to lifelong learning. When we teach this skill, we
help students sample the rigors and delights of the examined life. When
we ask students to learn to think for themselves and to understand them-
selves as thinkers—rather than telling them what to think and have them
recite it back—we help foster habits
of introspection, analysis, and open,
joyous communication.
Unfortunately, many studentscome to college without some
of the skills they need to succeed in
academic work. In California, the
richest state in the richest country the
world has ever known, we skulk in
the bottom fifth among states in per
capita spending on education. The
state system has shortchanged many
students who live in poorer school
districts. Crammed into overcrowded classrooms, led by underpaid teach-
ers who labor in crumbling infrastructure, many students do not get the
quality education they deserve. To compound this misfortune, some col-
lege administrators and professors view these students—often poor, often
minority, sometimes bilingual—as “deficits.” These students pose prob-
lems for our teaching; we have to spend lots of money to “compensate”
for their “deficiencies.”
.
A joint keynote with Sean Michael Morris at the Dream 2019 conference in Long Beach, California.
It is urgent we have teachers, it is urgent we employ them, pay them, support them with adequate resources; but it is also urgency which defines the project of teaching. In a political climate increasingly defined by its obstinacy, anti-intellectualism, and deflection of fact and care; in a society still divided across lines of race, nationality, religion, gender, sexuality, income, ability, and privilege, teaching has an important (urgent) role to play.
1. Szabo 1
Emma Szabo
Professor Mrs. Weiss
October/24/2016
Intellectualism and Education are Compatible
People in today’s society have been living in a system where students are incapable to
reach their potential due to a constricted grading method, which narrows their mind. This issue is
the verifying reason why so many intellectually mature teenagers do feebly in school. As
claimed by a highly revered professor, Gerald Graft, there is an effective solution for altering
beneficially the academic program. Mr. Graft accentuates the feasibility of integrating
shrewdness with the academic work in his essay, “Hidden Intellectualism. “
Schools and colleges are being accused of being unable to induce students to gain higher
grades. Instructional results have been exacerbating since the world stepped into the 21st
century. Children and teenagers are losing their motivation to perform properly in school or
being encouraged by other activities which deprives them from the precious time to study. Either
way, the school system provides a futile role to tempt students into academic work and to guide
the youth into the prominence of proper education. Society cannot perpetually blame school in a
desperate circumstance. Unfortunately, this generation has reached the point where people are
prone to devaluate the significance of reading real literature. Magazines, journals, and gossip
papers are effortlessly taking over the shelves in book stores. Moreover, for some of today’s
teenagers it would be challenging to comprehend literature due to the deficit of a sophisticated
vocabulary. It is a thwarting obstacle to understand a passage or an old wise fellow without
knowing the meaning of the words.
2. Szabo 2
As reported by Gerald Graft, teachers should first assign interesting magazines for
students because if they start to read they could enter debates and gain useful skills in how to
argue or express their own opinions, additionally, it would be a proper initiative in the pursuit to
later assign plays from Shakespeare (268). Many people would contradict this recommendation
since magazines are using a prevailingly basic level of vocabulary and many times inappropriate
English. Although to encourage the youth into reading maybe it would be effective, but it should
be accomplished before they go to high school. Another reason why giving intersecting
magazines to youth is a mistake because after they would reject valuable literature and dismiss
the comprehension of how poets and writers have changed, affected and influenced the world.
Graft insists that the real intellectual world exist in the world, beyond school. To refute
the professor’s opinion many times, adequate teachers are able to manifest rival interpretations,
evaluations of texts, and helpful arguments where students could acquire critical thinking skills
to defend their statement. Another verifying reason why Mr. Graft is wrong is because when a
child is exposed to the competition which, occurs in the world, he/she could suffer due to the
disparages or condescending rebuffs from reckless adults who assume that they are arguing with
spiritually mature individuals. This could cause irredeemable impediments in the child’s self-
expression.
One of the author’s premises states the following: “I believe that street smarts bear out
book smarts in our culture not because street smarts are nonintellectual, as we generally suppose,
but because they satisfy an intellectual thirst more toughly than school culture, which seems pale
and unreal” (Graff 268). It is veritable since grades do not evaluate children’s intelligence, it is
not a measurement. On the other hand, it is a clearly fallacious assumption because “book smart”
3. Szabo 3
students are earning the highest grades and work hard for them in the pursuit to ease their thirst
for intellectualism.
Evidently individuals who are performing better in school than in actual life or vice versa
are both eager to satisfy their exuberant desire to succeed. Considering the issues the school
systems are facing is the incompetence to implement a system where education and
intellectualism are equally compatible. Although it is changeable with proper evaluation and
persistence to assess the problem and come up with an efficient solution; clearly teachers are
consistently working on it, which is an auspicious start in the pursuit in accomplishing the goal.
4. Szabo 4
Works Cited
Graff, Gerald. “Hidden Intellectualism.” They Say/I Say, edited by Gerald Graff, Cathy
Birkenstein, and Russel Dust, Norton, W. W. & Company, 2015, pp 264-270.