Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q created a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. The manager praised Q for doing an excellent job. Employee O then streamlined the process further by negotiating with a boatman to deliver boxes for $3 daily, eliminating the need to assign employees to the task. The manager said O did an outstanding job and was very proud. The difference between the employees was that A, B, and Q focused on the assigned task, while O questioned the need for
Employee Q showed initiative by writing a standard operating procedure (SOP) for completing the task of crossing the river, documenting mistakes, efficient methods, and a budget and timeline. Employee O then showed outstanding initiative by realizing the task itself was unnecessary and negotiating with the boatman to deliver boxes for $3, eliminating the need for the task altogether. The document contrasts the employees' approaches to the same repetitive task and argues that true initiative, like Employee O demonstrated, involves questioning processes and creating permanent efficiencies, rather than just completing tasks or creating procedures.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took the initiative to write a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. The manager praised Q for doing an excellent job by creating an SOP to standardize the process. Later, employee O studied Q's SOP but realized the company was unnecessarily spending money sending employees across the river daily. O negotiated with the boatman to deliver boxes for a low cost of $3 daily, eliminating the need for the task. The manager was very proud
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took time to develop a standardized operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. Employee O then used Q's SOP but realized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated a more efficient solution, having the boatman deliver boxes for a low cost, saving both time and money for the company. The document contrasts taking initiative to standardize tasks versus questioning the underlying need for the task itself to find a better outcome.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took time to develop a standardized operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. Employee O then used Q's SOP but realized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated a more efficient solution, having the boatman deliver items for a low cost, saving both time and money for the company. The document contrasts taking initiative to standardize a task versus questioning the underlying need for the task itself, with O's approach seen as demonstrating initiative and an "outstanding job".
Employee A completed the task of crossing a river to retrieve a box within the allotted hour using a shared boat for $10. Employee B completed the same task in half the time by taking another employee in need across on a rented motoscooter for $30. Employee Q realized inefficiencies in how the task was being performed and created a standard operating procedure to complete it within budget and time. Employee O recognized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated with a boatman to deliver boxes for $3 daily instead of continuing to assign employees to cross the river. The manager praised Employees B, Q, and O for demonstrating initiative in improving efficiencies beyond simply completing the assigned task.
This document contains summaries of several experiences from the author's life:
1) The author describes taking an English course in college where trips with the professor improved their English skills through speaking practice, resulting in an A grade.
2) Volunteer work providing customer service and translations at an expo park gave valuable experience interacting with visitors from other countries.
3) Filling in for a manager at an assistant job went well and showed the author could handle significant responsibilities.
4) A presentation on retirement planning required research but was successful at educating classmates on this important topic.
Ben worked as a summer worker from June to August 2015. He had little experience but proved to be a hard worker who was willing to learn. Ben worked hard at every task and asked questions to fully understand new assignments. He was also humble and willing to do any job needed. Ben demonstrated strong leadership by organizing the storage garage and helping others understand the new system. His employer highly recommends Ben and believes he will be great in supply chain roles due to his leadership, process improvement abilities, and talent for results.
Brandy Lewis is seeking a career opportunity with potential for advancement. She has a GED and over 15 years of work experience managing teams in transportation and manufacturing. Her most recent roles included overseeing 40 employees as a transportation manager and running quality control for an insulation production line. She aims to create a beneficial work environment for all through strong leadership, organization, and multitasking skills.
Employee Q showed initiative by writing a standard operating procedure (SOP) for completing the task of crossing the river, documenting mistakes, efficient methods, and a budget and timeline. Employee O then showed outstanding initiative by realizing the task itself was unnecessary and negotiating with the boatman to deliver boxes for $3, eliminating the need for the task altogether. The document contrasts the employees' approaches to the same repetitive task and argues that true initiative, like Employee O demonstrated, involves questioning processes and creating permanent efficiencies, rather than just completing tasks or creating procedures.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took the initiative to write a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. The manager praised Q for doing an excellent job by creating an SOP to standardize the process. Later, employee O studied Q's SOP but realized the company was unnecessarily spending money sending employees across the river daily. O negotiated with the boatman to deliver boxes for a low cost of $3 daily, eliminating the need for the task. The manager was very proud
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took time to develop a standardized operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. Employee O then used Q's SOP but realized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated a more efficient solution, having the boatman deliver boxes for a low cost, saving both time and money for the company. The document contrasts taking initiative to standardize tasks versus questioning the underlying need for the task itself to find a better outcome.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q then took time to develop a standardized operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. Employee O then used Q's SOP but realized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated a more efficient solution, having the boatman deliver items for a low cost, saving both time and money for the company. The document contrasts taking initiative to standardize a task versus questioning the underlying need for the task itself, with O's approach seen as demonstrating initiative and an "outstanding job".
Employee A completed the task of crossing a river to retrieve a box within the allotted hour using a shared boat for $10. Employee B completed the same task in half the time by taking another employee in need across on a rented motoscooter for $30. Employee Q realized inefficiencies in how the task was being performed and created a standard operating procedure to complete it within budget and time. Employee O recognized the task itself was unnecessary and negotiated with a boatman to deliver boxes for $3 daily instead of continuing to assign employees to cross the river. The manager praised Employees B, Q, and O for demonstrating initiative in improving efficiencies beyond simply completing the assigned task.
This document contains summaries of several experiences from the author's life:
1) The author describes taking an English course in college where trips with the professor improved their English skills through speaking practice, resulting in an A grade.
2) Volunteer work providing customer service and translations at an expo park gave valuable experience interacting with visitors from other countries.
3) Filling in for a manager at an assistant job went well and showed the author could handle significant responsibilities.
4) A presentation on retirement planning required research but was successful at educating classmates on this important topic.
Ben worked as a summer worker from June to August 2015. He had little experience but proved to be a hard worker who was willing to learn. Ben worked hard at every task and asked questions to fully understand new assignments. He was also humble and willing to do any job needed. Ben demonstrated strong leadership by organizing the storage garage and helping others understand the new system. His employer highly recommends Ben and believes he will be great in supply chain roles due to his leadership, process improvement abilities, and talent for results.
Brandy Lewis is seeking a career opportunity with potential for advancement. She has a GED and over 15 years of work experience managing teams in transportation and manufacturing. Her most recent roles included overseeing 40 employees as a transportation manager and running quality control for an insulation production line. She aims to create a beneficial work environment for all through strong leadership, organization, and multitasking skills.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q created a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. The manager praised Q for doing an excellent job. Employee O then streamlined the process further by negotiating with a boatman to deliver boxes for $3 daily, eliminating the need for employees to cross the river. The manager said O had done an outstanding job and was very proud. The passage discusses the differences between employees who simply complete tasks versus those who think critically about improving processes.
This document provides the schedule for a SharePoint Saturday event taking place on May 18th, 2013 in Baltimore. The all day event includes over 30 sessions across 9 time slots, covering various technical topics related to SharePoint 2013 like administration, governance, search, apps, and development. Sessions will be held in multiple rooms and include presentations, workshops and lightning talks. Lunch will be provided and the day will conclude with closing remarks.
The document provides an overview of building mega menus for internal team site navigation in SharePoint. It outlines the planning, research, design, and building process for mega menus. The key steps include:
1) Planning by examining content, analyzing taxonomy, and creating mockups to define the information architecture and structure.
2) Researching examples of mega menus from companies like Sears, Gander Mountain, and Boston University IT to inform the design.
3) Creating concept drawings and designing the menu layout, color scheme, and visual style to match the portal while adding graphical interest.
4) Evaluating the design for quality, functionality, and user experience before implementation.
The Quad-D methodology combines insights from process engineering, systems engineering, and project management. It defines requirements, designs a SharePoint solution to meet them, develops a prototype leveraging key SharePoint features, and deploys the solution with change management processes. This ensures standardized, repeatable, and comprehensive organizational solutions that address stakeholder needs and challenges like ad-hoc solutions and deployment delays.
The document discusses using Microsoft Project 2013 and SharePoint 2013 to solve common project management problems like a lack of a common tool and tool complexity. It proposes setting up a SharePoint site for each project with Project used for scheduling, tracking resources, and collaboration. The demo shows resource management functionality. Next steps include training project managers, monitoring resources, and setting up governance for the SharePoint sites.
Digiliant is offering easy leasing options for ISCSI and NAS storage servers to help organizations meet their storage needs. They provide high-quality network storage devices and servers from 1U to 8U sizes offering up to 324TB of storage capacity. Digiliant serves a variety of clients with ISCSI storage and NAS systems powered by Windows and Linux, offering cost savings and flexibility. Interested parties can get a free quote online for leasing options catering to corporate, educational, and government sectors.
This document provides an introduction and hands-on guide to using Windows PowerShell with SharePoint 2013, Office 365, and Active Directory. It discusses getting started with PowerShell basics, commands, writing cmdlets, using variables and objects, filtering outputs, and interacting with PowerShell. It also covers adding the SharePoint snap-in, managing permissions, searching/working with SharePoint objects, provisioning service applications, and creating warm-up scripts. The document aims to help developers get started writing PowerShell scripts for SharePoint administration and management.
Adam Levithan and Jill Hannemann of Portal Solutions discuss cloud implementations and the benefits of SharePoint Online. A comparative analysis of on-premises solutions is provided to outline the financial implications of on-prem vs. hosted. vs. SharePoint Online solutions. Delivered at @Baltimore SharePoint User Group.
Employee Q was assigned to cross a river and retrieve a box within an hour without using the bridge. Q studied how previous employees A, B, and C completed the task, realizing there was significant variation in time and costs. Q created a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to complete the task efficiently within budget and time. The manager praised Q for doing an excellent job. Employee O then streamlined the process further by negotiating with a boatman to deliver boxes for $3 daily, eliminating the need for employees to cross the river. The manager said O had done an outstanding job and was very proud. The passage discusses the differences between employees who simply complete tasks versus those who think critically about improving processes.
This document provides the schedule for a SharePoint Saturday event taking place on May 18th, 2013 in Baltimore. The all day event includes over 30 sessions across 9 time slots, covering various technical topics related to SharePoint 2013 like administration, governance, search, apps, and development. Sessions will be held in multiple rooms and include presentations, workshops and lightning talks. Lunch will be provided and the day will conclude with closing remarks.
The document provides an overview of building mega menus for internal team site navigation in SharePoint. It outlines the planning, research, design, and building process for mega menus. The key steps include:
1) Planning by examining content, analyzing taxonomy, and creating mockups to define the information architecture and structure.
2) Researching examples of mega menus from companies like Sears, Gander Mountain, and Boston University IT to inform the design.
3) Creating concept drawings and designing the menu layout, color scheme, and visual style to match the portal while adding graphical interest.
4) Evaluating the design for quality, functionality, and user experience before implementation.
The Quad-D methodology combines insights from process engineering, systems engineering, and project management. It defines requirements, designs a SharePoint solution to meet them, develops a prototype leveraging key SharePoint features, and deploys the solution with change management processes. This ensures standardized, repeatable, and comprehensive organizational solutions that address stakeholder needs and challenges like ad-hoc solutions and deployment delays.
The document discusses using Microsoft Project 2013 and SharePoint 2013 to solve common project management problems like a lack of a common tool and tool complexity. It proposes setting up a SharePoint site for each project with Project used for scheduling, tracking resources, and collaboration. The demo shows resource management functionality. Next steps include training project managers, monitoring resources, and setting up governance for the SharePoint sites.
Digiliant is offering easy leasing options for ISCSI and NAS storage servers to help organizations meet their storage needs. They provide high-quality network storage devices and servers from 1U to 8U sizes offering up to 324TB of storage capacity. Digiliant serves a variety of clients with ISCSI storage and NAS systems powered by Windows and Linux, offering cost savings and flexibility. Interested parties can get a free quote online for leasing options catering to corporate, educational, and government sectors.
This document provides an introduction and hands-on guide to using Windows PowerShell with SharePoint 2013, Office 365, and Active Directory. It discusses getting started with PowerShell basics, commands, writing cmdlets, using variables and objects, filtering outputs, and interacting with PowerShell. It also covers adding the SharePoint snap-in, managing permissions, searching/working with SharePoint objects, provisioning service applications, and creating warm-up scripts. The document aims to help developers get started writing PowerShell scripts for SharePoint administration and management.
Adam Levithan and Jill Hannemann of Portal Solutions discuss cloud implementations and the benefits of SharePoint Online. A comparative analysis of on-premises solutions is provided to outline the financial implications of on-prem vs. hosted. vs. SharePoint Online solutions. Delivered at @Baltimore SharePoint User Group.
2. Employee "A" in a company walked up to his manager and
asked what my job is for the day?
3. The manager took "A" to the bank of a river and asked him to
cross the river and reach the other side of the bank and bring
the box back in less than an hour without using the bridge.
4. "A" completed this task successfully by taking a shared boat for $10
and reported back to the manager about the completion of the
task assigned in 55 minutes. The manager smiled and said,
GOOD JOB
5. Next day Employee "B" reported to the same manager and asked
him the job for the day. The manager assigned the same task as
above to this person also.
6. The Employee "B' before starting the task saw Employee "C" struggling in the river
to reach the other side of the bank. He realized "C" has the same task. Now "B"
hired a motoscooter for $ 30 and crossed the river and also took "C" along.
7. "B" reported back to the manager that they did the job in 30
minutes and the manager smiled and said,
VERY GOOD JOB
8. The following day Employee "Q" reported to the same manager and asked
him the job for the day. The manager assigned the same task again.
9. Employee "Q" before starting the work did some home work and realized
"A", "B" & "C" all has done this task before. He met them and understood
how they performed (time spent 2 hours).
10. He realized that there is a need for Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) for doing this task as there was huge
time and money variations.
11. He sat down and wrote down the detailed SOP for crossing the river,
he documented the common mistakes people made, various means of
achieving the tasks, and tricks to do the task efficiently, within budget
($ 15) and on time (max time spent 1 hour) (time spent – 4 hours).
12. Using the SOP he had written down he crossed the river
and reported back to the manager along with
SOP material. The manger said,
“Q”
You have done an
EXCELLENT JOB
13. The following day Employee "O' reported to the manager and asked
him the job for the day. The manager assigned the same task again.
14. "O" studied the SOP written down by "Q" and sat and thought about the whole
task (5 minutes). He realized company is spending a lot of money in sending
the person over when they can just ask the boatman to bring the box.
15. He decided not to cross the river, negotiated with the boatman who agreed to
do the same for $3, sat down and enjoyed his beer while the boatman brought
his box in the assigned time. He went back to his manager and said,
You no longer need
to assign this task to
any one, boatman will
deliver it to us for
$3 everyday.
16. The manager smiled and said,
Outstanding job
'O'. I am very
proud of you.
17. What is the difference between A, B, Q & O????????
Many a times in life we get tasks to be done at home, at office, at play. Most of us
end up doing what is expected out of us. Do we feel happy? Most probably yes. We
would be often disappointed when the recognition is not meeting our expectation.
18. Let us compare ourselves with "B". From a company point of view "B" has
saved time but spent huge money on something that was not critical.
While he achieved the task in 50% time of the assigned task, he was
focused on the task and not on the relevance of it.
19. "Q" created knowledge base and more paperwork for the team. More often
than not, huge procedures, timelines and methods exist without questioning
the rationale. This knowledge creation for the team is of immense help
but always needs to be preceded by the question WHY???
Something that we forget as
we blindly follow and try
and standardize a task that
can be eliminated or more
efficiently performed in
a different manner..
20. Now to the outstanding person, "O" made the task, what it was anyway,
irrelevant; he created a Permanent Asset to the organization, freeing
up precious time for more useful work – saved time (full one hour
eliminated) and money (only spending $3) too.
21. If you notice B, Q and O all have demonstrated "team spirit" over
and above individual performance; also they have demonstrated a
very invaluable characteristic known as "INITIATIVE". Initiative
pays of every where whether at work or at personal life.
22. If you put initiative you will succeed. Initiative is a continual process and
it
never ends. This is because this year's achievement is next year's task.
You
cannot use the same success story every year. Out-of-Box thinkers are
always premium and that is what every one constantly looks out for.