This document discusses capturing interactive data transformations using provenance workflows. It presents a model for interactive data transformations (IDTs) involving user interactions. Challenges include representing IDTs and facilitating reuse. The approach models IDTs and represents provenance using the Open Provenance Model. It describes capturing provenance for IDTs during interactive sessions to provide transparency into the transformation process. A case study demonstrates implementing provenance for an IDT tool based on the Google Refine platform.

1. Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
Capturing interactive data transformation
operations using provenance workflows
Tope Omitola, Andre Freitas, Edward Curry, Sean
O'Riain, Nicholas Gibbins and Nigel Shadbolt
SWPM Workshop 28.05.2012, Herakleion, Crete
 Copyright 2009 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.

2. Outline
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Motivation
 Interactive data transformations (IDTs)
 IDT & Provenance
 Modelling IDTs
 Provenance Representation
 Provenance Capture
 Case Study
 Conclusion

3. Motivation
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Dataspaces:
 High number of heterogeneous data sources
 Complex data transformation environment
 Need for both repeatable data transformations and once-
off transformations
 Traditional ETL approaches for data
transformation/integration:
 Based on scripting/programming
 Focus on repeatable data transformation processes

4. Interactive Data Transformation (IDTs)
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Based on user interaction paradigms for user
creation of data transformations
 Explores GUI elements mapping to data
transformation operations
 Instant feedback of each iteration
 Complementary to existing ETL tools
 Lower the barriers for non-programmers (reduces
programming effort) of doing data transformations
 Example platforms: Google Refine, Potters Wheel,
Wrangler

5. Interactive Data Transformation (IDTs)
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

6. Challenges
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 How to model IDTs?
 Facilitating the reuse of previous IDTs
 Representing IDTs
Provenance
 Making IDT platforms provenance-aware
 Enabling transportability across IDT and ETL
platforms

7. IDT & Provenance
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Provenance supports representation of interactive
data transformations
 Output: a provenance descriptor which shows the
relationship between the inputs, the outputs, and
the applied transformation operations
 Both retrospective and prospective provenance

8. IDT
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 IDT model
 Formal model (Algebra for IDT)
 Provenance representation
 Provenance capture of IDTs

9. IDT Model: Core Elements
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Schema and instance data
 Set of predefined operations
 GUI elements mapping to predefined operations
 User actions
 Operation selection
 Parameter selection
 Operation composition (workflow)

10. IDT Model
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

11. Formalizing the mapping from IDT to
Provenance
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Definition 1: A provenance-based interactive data
transformation engine, consists of a set of
transformations (or activities) on a set of datasets
generating outputs in the form of other datasets or
events which may trigger further transformations
 Definition 2: An interactive data transformation
event, consists of the input dataset, the output
dataset(s), the applied transformation function,
and the time the transformation took place

12. Formalizing the mapping from IDT to
Provenance
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Definition 3: A run is a function from time to
dataset(s) and the transformation applied to those
dataset(s)
 Definition 4: A trace is the sequence of pairs of a
run and the time the run was made

13. Provenance Representation
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Proposed in Representing Interoperable Provenance
Descriptions for ETL Workflows
 Three-layered provenance model:
 Open Provenance Model Vocabulary Layer
 Cogs ETL Provenance Vocabulary
 Domain-Specific Model Layer
 Linked Data standards

14. Provenance Capture Layers
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

15. Provenance Event-Capture Sequence Flow
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie

16. Case study
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 Implementation over the GR Platform
 Example descriptor
@prefix grf: <http://127.0.0.1:3333/project/1402144365904/> .
grf :MassCellChange-1092380975 rdf:type opmv:Process,
cogs:ColumnOperation, cogs:Transformation; Mapping to the actual program
cogs:operationName "MassCellChange"^^xsd:string;
cogs:programUsed "com.google.refine.operations.cell.MassEditOperation"^^xsd:string; Process
rdfs:label "Mass edit 1 cells in column ==List of winners=="^^xsd:string.
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_0 rdf:type opmv:Artifact ; Input Artifact
rdfs:label "* '''1955 [[Meena Kumari]]'[[Parineeta (1953 film)|Parineeta]]''''' as '''Lolita'''"^^xsd:string.
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_1 rdf:type opmv:Artifact; Output Artifact
rdfs:label "* '''John Wayne'''"^^xsd:string.
Workflow structure
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_1 opmv:wasDerivedFrom grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_0.
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975 opmv:used grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_0.
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_1 opmv:wasGeneratedBy grf:MassCellChange-1092380975.
grf:MassCellChange-1092380975/1_1 opmv:wasGeneratedAt "2011-11-16T11:2:14"^xsd: dateTime.

17. Conclusion
Digital Enterprise Research Institute www.deri.ie
 The proposed approach provides low impact on the
existing IDT process
 Provenance representation supports different data
models
 Preliminary implementation of a Google Refine
provenance extension