1
Using OKRs in the SAFe
Enterprise
Align and Focus on outcomes and enable business agility
2
Yuval Yeret
SAFe Fellow/SPCT | Scrum.org PST
Business Agility Coach/Trainer @
AgileSparks
3
OKRs - An Example using this session’s objective
Objective Key Results
Learn how
to effectively
use OKRs in
the SAFe
enterprise
Achieve a good understanding of SAFe guidance for Applying
OKRs in SAFe (75% or more in assessment exam)
Be able to describe and identify at least 3 out of the key OKR
implementation challenges you might encounter when applying
OKRs in SAFe
Be able to describe success patterns to overcome at least 3 OKR
challenges leveraging SAFe Lean/Agile principles and practices
Bonus: Be able to describe how to use SAFe Lean/Agile practices
to help in non-SAFe OKR implementations
Bonus: Be able to pitch SAFe as a solution to struggling OKR
implementations.
4
Overview of OKRs and SAFe Guidance
5
OKRs - Align and Focus around Outcomes
1. Enhancing
strategic
alignment across
a SAFe portfolio
2. Defining
business
outcomes for
epics and lean
business cases
3. Setting
improvement
goals for the
SAFe
transformation
https://www.scaledagileframework.com/applying-okrs-in-the-scaled-agile-framework/
6
7
Business and Transformational OKRs
https://www.scaledagileframework.com/metrics/
Transforming the Org
Transforming the Org
Building
Solutions
8
Building Solutions - Move the needle on Operational Value Stream KPIs
https://scaledagile.com/connecting-okrs-kpis-ovss-and-dvss-in-safe/
9
Challenges and Success Patterns with implementing OKRs
10
OKR
Implementation
Challenges /
Symptoms
1. Output/Activity focused OKRs
2. Too many OKRs
3. Set and Forget
4. Command and Control / Too detailed
5. Many OKRs require
collaboration/dependencies across the
organization
6. OKRs run in parallel to the SAFe
Epics/PI Objectives/Features
11
12
#1. Output/Activity focused (tasks / milestones) OKRs
Why it matters?
▪ Fixes specifications designs too early
▪ “Feature Factory”
▪ Impediment to Autonomy and Innovation
Output-focused OKRs
Objective: Release ALICE v1
Key Results:
● Develop Rear and Side
Camera Distance Warning
● Fix 10 major/critical defects
● ALICE Gold Subscription
● Customer onboarding wizard
13
What to do ? Output-focused OKRs Outcome-focused OKRs Well-formed
Outcome-focused OKRs
Objective: Release
ALICE v1
Objective: Increase
market position within the
autonomous delivery
market
Objective: Achieve a
dominant position within
the autonomous delivery
market
Key Results: Key Results: Key Results:
● Develop Rear and
Side Camera
Distance Warning
● Ability to deliver in
dense metro areas
through parallel
parking
● Increase
serviceable market
to 75% including
dense metro areas
● Fix 10 major/critical
defects
● Improve customer
satisfaction rating
● Increase Net
Promoter Score
from 35 to 60
● ALICE Gold
Subscription
● Focus on driving
repeat business
● Improve repeat
business rates from
60% to 80%
● Customer
onboarding wizard
● Onboard new
customers
● Acquire 15% new
customers over the
next 12 months
● Identify type of OKR
(awareness of
output-focus)
● Form
Outcome-focused
Objectives
● Form
Outcome-focused
KRs (even
qualitative is better
than nothing…)
● Form quantitative
Outcome-focused
KRs
14
What to do ?
● Treat OKRs as an Hypothesis
(Assume Variability -
Preserve Options)
● Implement a Learning Loop
15
Why it matters?
Excessive WIP
▪ Decreases organizational
productivity
▪ Confuses priorities
▪ Increases context switching
▪ Impedes the flow of value
▪ Everything is important ==
Nothing is important
What to do about it
▪ Think of the Flow of OKRs
▪ Apply Flow Accelerators -
Visualize and Limit WIP
▪ Consider the work needed to
achieve the OKRs as a feasibility
test
▪ Use OKRs for Wildly Important
Goals (Not the Whirlwind) (4DX)
#2. Too many OKRs
SAFe Flow Accelerators - https://www.scaledagileframework.com/make-value-flow-without-interruptions/
4DX, WIG, Whirlwind - https://www.franklincovey.com/4dx-book/
16
Leverage Portfolio
Flow
Question - With this flow in mind - when does it make sense to commit to
Value Stream / ART OKRs?
MVP
Persevere
17
#3. Command and Control - Too Detailed, Too Strict, Top-Down
Cascading
Why it matters?
▪ Strict Cascading kills Autonomy /
Initiative
▪ Leads to task/output orientation
by the time teams create KRs
What to do about it
▪ Provide high-level OKRs as input
▪ ARTs define their own OKRs -
Bottom-up and sideways
▪ Align/relate through “Why Now”
▪ Take inspiration from PI Planning/
PI Objectives structure
18
What’s the difference between OKRs and MBO?
https://www.whatmatters.com/resources/okr-and-mbo-difference-between
19
Case Study - Big Room OKR Term Planning (Does this look familiar to anybody?)
When What Facilitator Outcome Location
30m
Quarterly Planning
Adjustment
Guidance for Team
Quarterly OKR
finalization
Main room
2-3h
Teams finalize Quarterly
OKRs
Individual
Team
Breakouts
Leadership
Team
circulates and
available to
give feedback
/ answer
question
Updated Quarterly
OKRs
Assigned Breakout
Rooms
1-2h
Final Quarterly OKRs Review
Align on Final Quarterly
OKRs
Main room
LUNCH
1h
Risks Management &
Confidence Vote
Determine what part of
Quarterly Plan still
needs work
Main room
As needed
Rework as needed
(if short - plenar. if this is
in-depth will be in breakouts /
open space mode)
Final Quarterly Plan Main room
30m
Retrospective / Closing
Documented learnings
for next cycle
Main room
Length What Facilitator Outcome Location
15m
Opening / Overview
Clarity on purpose/
approach to Planning
Main room
30m
Reiterate Company OKRs
Leadership
Team
Clarity on annual +
Quarterly Company
OKRs
Main room
2h
Teams draft realistic
Quarterly OKRs
Individual
Team
Breakouts
facilitated by
SMs/POs
Team Quarterly Draft
OKRs
Assigned
Breakout
15m
Leadership Team + PO -
Huddle
Plan how to collaborate
cross-team around
dependencies
Leadership
Breakout room
1h LUNCH (Opportunity to connect across teams or continue to plan in
teams)
room
Breakouts
1h
Teams draft realistic
Quarterly OKRs (continued)
Individual
Team
Breakouts
facilitated by
POs
Team Quarterly Draft
OKRs
Assigned
Breakouts
1-2h
Review Team Quarterly Draft
OKRs - Lightning round
readout from each team +
Confidence Vote
Feedback on Quarterly
OKRs
Main room
1h
Leadership Team + PO -
Review & Problem Solving
Adjustments / Guidance
for Day 2
Leadership
Breakout
Day 1 Day 2
20
#4. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across
the organization
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/improving-focus-alignment-organizing-around-okrs-managing-yuval-yeret/
Loan
Origination
Credit Scoring
System
AI
Underwriting
Channels Core
Banking
Why it matters?
▪ Coordination overhead
▪ Tempting to cascade into
output/task OKRs (since each
value stream / ART cannot
own outcomes)
▪ Value Streams get farther and
farther from desired outcome.
Purpose/Meaning is lost.
▪
21
AI-Powered Loan
Underwriting
Product
What to do about it
▪ Organize around Value -
Identifying/Assessing DVS using
an OKR lens
▪ Also unlocks engagement/
motivation through Purpose
(Principle #8)
#4. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across
the organization
22
#5. Set and Forget
Why it matters?
▪ OKRs are just a waste of time if
they aren’t integrated into the
day-to-day
▪ Over time people will ignore them
and lose interest since they see
them as irrelevant
What to do about it
▪ Integrate into SAFe artifacts,
cadence, accountabilities
▪ Leaders and Product people
should mention and connect to
OKRs whenever possible
23
24
#6. OKRs run in parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI
Objectives/Features
Why it matters?
● Confusion - What do we use as Input for PIP? Features? OKRs? Both?
● When are ART OKRs created? How? How do we keep them realistic?
● What’s the relationship between Team/ART PI Objectives and OKRs?
25
#6. OKRs run in parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI Objectives/Features
What to do about it
● Use OKRs to guide Feature
creation and prioritization
● Consider OKRs draft until PIP
● After PIP refine OKRs based on PI
Objectives
26
Did you notice a theme
here in how we addressed
these issues?
1. Output/Activity focused (tasks
/ milestones OKRs)
2. Too many OKRs
3. Many OKRs require
collaboration/dependencies
across the organization
4. Command and Control / Too
detailed
5. Set and Forget
6. OKRs run in parallel to the
SAFe Epics/PI
Objectives/Features
SAFe Lean/Agile Leadership
#FTW
27
28
29
1. Output/Activity focused (tasks /
milestones OKRs)
2. Too many OKRs
3. Set and Forget
4. Many OKRs require
collaboration/dependencies across
the organization
5. Command and Control / Too
detailed
6. OKRs run in parallel to the
organization’s current way of
working
Can we use SAFe Lean/Agile
Leadership to improve OKRs
outside of a SAFe context?
Can we use some of these
OKR success patterns to tip
towards SAFe?
30
Follow up
https://www.linkedin.com/in/yuvalyeret/
https://www.scaledagileframework.com/applying-okrs-in-the-scaled-agile-framework/
https://www.agilesparks.co
m/agile-services/agilespar
ks-okr-offerings/
https://scaled
agile.com/con
necting-okrs-k
pis-ovss-and-
dvss-in-safe/
Loan
Originati
on
Credit Scoring
System
AI
Underwritin
g
Channels
Core
Bank
ing
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impr
oving-focus-alignment-organizing-ar
ound-okrs-managing-yuval-yeret/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fixing-ok
r-theater-using-agilescrum-principles-yu
val-yeret/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/improving
-focus-alignment-organizing-around-okrs-
managing-yuval-yeret/
https://www.scrum.or
g/resources/evidenc
e-based-manageme
nt-guide
31
32
Rate this Session!
33
Thank you!

OKRs for SAFe Summit 2022 - 20220705.pdf

  • 1.
    1 Using OKRs inthe SAFe Enterprise Align and Focus on outcomes and enable business agility
  • 2.
    2 Yuval Yeret SAFe Fellow/SPCT| Scrum.org PST Business Agility Coach/Trainer @ AgileSparks
  • 3.
    3 OKRs - AnExample using this session’s objective Objective Key Results Learn how to effectively use OKRs in the SAFe enterprise Achieve a good understanding of SAFe guidance for Applying OKRs in SAFe (75% or more in assessment exam) Be able to describe and identify at least 3 out of the key OKR implementation challenges you might encounter when applying OKRs in SAFe Be able to describe success patterns to overcome at least 3 OKR challenges leveraging SAFe Lean/Agile principles and practices Bonus: Be able to describe how to use SAFe Lean/Agile practices to help in non-SAFe OKR implementations Bonus: Be able to pitch SAFe as a solution to struggling OKR implementations.
  • 4.
    4 Overview of OKRsand SAFe Guidance
  • 5.
    5 OKRs - Alignand Focus around Outcomes 1. Enhancing strategic alignment across a SAFe portfolio 2. Defining business outcomes for epics and lean business cases 3. Setting improvement goals for the SAFe transformation https://www.scaledagileframework.com/applying-okrs-in-the-scaled-agile-framework/
  • 6.
  • 7.
    7 Business and TransformationalOKRs https://www.scaledagileframework.com/metrics/ Transforming the Org Transforming the Org Building Solutions
  • 8.
    8 Building Solutions -Move the needle on Operational Value Stream KPIs https://scaledagile.com/connecting-okrs-kpis-ovss-and-dvss-in-safe/
  • 9.
    9 Challenges and SuccessPatterns with implementing OKRs
  • 10.
    10 OKR Implementation Challenges / Symptoms 1. Output/Activityfocused OKRs 2. Too many OKRs 3. Set and Forget 4. Command and Control / Too detailed 5. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across the organization 6. OKRs run in parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI Objectives/Features
  • 11.
  • 12.
    12 #1. Output/Activity focused(tasks / milestones) OKRs Why it matters? ▪ Fixes specifications designs too early ▪ “Feature Factory” ▪ Impediment to Autonomy and Innovation Output-focused OKRs Objective: Release ALICE v1 Key Results: ● Develop Rear and Side Camera Distance Warning ● Fix 10 major/critical defects ● ALICE Gold Subscription ● Customer onboarding wizard
  • 13.
    13 What to do? Output-focused OKRs Outcome-focused OKRs Well-formed Outcome-focused OKRs Objective: Release ALICE v1 Objective: Increase market position within the autonomous delivery market Objective: Achieve a dominant position within the autonomous delivery market Key Results: Key Results: Key Results: ● Develop Rear and Side Camera Distance Warning ● Ability to deliver in dense metro areas through parallel parking ● Increase serviceable market to 75% including dense metro areas ● Fix 10 major/critical defects ● Improve customer satisfaction rating ● Increase Net Promoter Score from 35 to 60 ● ALICE Gold Subscription ● Focus on driving repeat business ● Improve repeat business rates from 60% to 80% ● Customer onboarding wizard ● Onboard new customers ● Acquire 15% new customers over the next 12 months ● Identify type of OKR (awareness of output-focus) ● Form Outcome-focused Objectives ● Form Outcome-focused KRs (even qualitative is better than nothing…) ● Form quantitative Outcome-focused KRs
  • 14.
    14 What to do? ● Treat OKRs as an Hypothesis (Assume Variability - Preserve Options) ● Implement a Learning Loop
  • 15.
    15 Why it matters? ExcessiveWIP ▪ Decreases organizational productivity ▪ Confuses priorities ▪ Increases context switching ▪ Impedes the flow of value ▪ Everything is important == Nothing is important What to do about it ▪ Think of the Flow of OKRs ▪ Apply Flow Accelerators - Visualize and Limit WIP ▪ Consider the work needed to achieve the OKRs as a feasibility test ▪ Use OKRs for Wildly Important Goals (Not the Whirlwind) (4DX) #2. Too many OKRs SAFe Flow Accelerators - https://www.scaledagileframework.com/make-value-flow-without-interruptions/ 4DX, WIG, Whirlwind - https://www.franklincovey.com/4dx-book/
  • 16.
    16 Leverage Portfolio Flow Question -With this flow in mind - when does it make sense to commit to Value Stream / ART OKRs? MVP Persevere
  • 17.
    17 #3. Command andControl - Too Detailed, Too Strict, Top-Down Cascading Why it matters? ▪ Strict Cascading kills Autonomy / Initiative ▪ Leads to task/output orientation by the time teams create KRs What to do about it ▪ Provide high-level OKRs as input ▪ ARTs define their own OKRs - Bottom-up and sideways ▪ Align/relate through “Why Now” ▪ Take inspiration from PI Planning/ PI Objectives structure
  • 18.
    18 What’s the differencebetween OKRs and MBO? https://www.whatmatters.com/resources/okr-and-mbo-difference-between
  • 19.
    19 Case Study -Big Room OKR Term Planning (Does this look familiar to anybody?) When What Facilitator Outcome Location 30m Quarterly Planning Adjustment Guidance for Team Quarterly OKR finalization Main room 2-3h Teams finalize Quarterly OKRs Individual Team Breakouts Leadership Team circulates and available to give feedback / answer question Updated Quarterly OKRs Assigned Breakout Rooms 1-2h Final Quarterly OKRs Review Align on Final Quarterly OKRs Main room LUNCH 1h Risks Management & Confidence Vote Determine what part of Quarterly Plan still needs work Main room As needed Rework as needed (if short - plenar. if this is in-depth will be in breakouts / open space mode) Final Quarterly Plan Main room 30m Retrospective / Closing Documented learnings for next cycle Main room Length What Facilitator Outcome Location 15m Opening / Overview Clarity on purpose/ approach to Planning Main room 30m Reiterate Company OKRs Leadership Team Clarity on annual + Quarterly Company OKRs Main room 2h Teams draft realistic Quarterly OKRs Individual Team Breakouts facilitated by SMs/POs Team Quarterly Draft OKRs Assigned Breakout 15m Leadership Team + PO - Huddle Plan how to collaborate cross-team around dependencies Leadership Breakout room 1h LUNCH (Opportunity to connect across teams or continue to plan in teams) room Breakouts 1h Teams draft realistic Quarterly OKRs (continued) Individual Team Breakouts facilitated by POs Team Quarterly Draft OKRs Assigned Breakouts 1-2h Review Team Quarterly Draft OKRs - Lightning round readout from each team + Confidence Vote Feedback on Quarterly OKRs Main room 1h Leadership Team + PO - Review & Problem Solving Adjustments / Guidance for Day 2 Leadership Breakout Day 1 Day 2
  • 20.
    20 #4. Many OKRsrequire collaboration/dependencies across the organization https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/improving-focus-alignment-organizing-around-okrs-managing-yuval-yeret/ Loan Origination Credit Scoring System AI Underwriting Channels Core Banking Why it matters? ▪ Coordination overhead ▪ Tempting to cascade into output/task OKRs (since each value stream / ART cannot own outcomes) ▪ Value Streams get farther and farther from desired outcome. Purpose/Meaning is lost. ▪
  • 21.
    21 AI-Powered Loan Underwriting Product What todo about it ▪ Organize around Value - Identifying/Assessing DVS using an OKR lens ▪ Also unlocks engagement/ motivation through Purpose (Principle #8) #4. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across the organization
  • 22.
    22 #5. Set andForget Why it matters? ▪ OKRs are just a waste of time if they aren’t integrated into the day-to-day ▪ Over time people will ignore them and lose interest since they see them as irrelevant What to do about it ▪ Integrate into SAFe artifacts, cadence, accountabilities ▪ Leaders and Product people should mention and connect to OKRs whenever possible
  • 23.
  • 24.
    24 #6. OKRs runin parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI Objectives/Features Why it matters? ● Confusion - What do we use as Input for PIP? Features? OKRs? Both? ● When are ART OKRs created? How? How do we keep them realistic? ● What’s the relationship between Team/ART PI Objectives and OKRs?
  • 25.
    25 #6. OKRs runin parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI Objectives/Features What to do about it ● Use OKRs to guide Feature creation and prioritization ● Consider OKRs draft until PIP ● After PIP refine OKRs based on PI Objectives
  • 26.
    26 Did you noticea theme here in how we addressed these issues? 1. Output/Activity focused (tasks / milestones OKRs) 2. Too many OKRs 3. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across the organization 4. Command and Control / Too detailed 5. Set and Forget 6. OKRs run in parallel to the SAFe Epics/PI Objectives/Features SAFe Lean/Agile Leadership #FTW
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    29 1. Output/Activity focused(tasks / milestones OKRs) 2. Too many OKRs 3. Set and Forget 4. Many OKRs require collaboration/dependencies across the organization 5. Command and Control / Too detailed 6. OKRs run in parallel to the organization’s current way of working Can we use SAFe Lean/Agile Leadership to improve OKRs outside of a SAFe context? Can we use some of these OKR success patterns to tip towards SAFe?
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.