This document is an offer from Hunters for Luck Ltd to provide advertising services on their website www.huntersforluck.com. It outlines the duties of both parties, with Hunters for Luck agreeing to post customer advertising materials and facilitate tourist bookings, while customers must follow posting rules and pay a 10% commission. The offer details definitions, terms of use, responsibilities, payment procedures, and provides contact information for both parties.
Patna hc illegal migrants order aug 18ZahidManiyar
1) The Patna High Court reviewed an affidavit from the Bihar government about establishing detention centers for illegal foreign nationals outside of jail premises.
2) The affidavit stated that the government has approved a proposal to set up a temporary detention center at the Bihar Institute of Correctional Administration in Hajipur.
3) However, the court found the affidavit vague about the timeline for establishing detention centers and ensuring the temporary center has adequate infrastructure. It directed the government to file a fresh affidavit providing more details.
The document is a court order from the High Court of Jharkhand granting anticipatory bail to two petitioners, Haji Muhammad Tahir and Haji Muhammad Islam. The petitioners were coordinators of a mosque and are accused of failing to inform authorities about hosting foreign nationals and their activities. The court notes the petitioners' arguments and the fact that a similar case granted anticipatory bail. Considering the facts, the court grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners for six weeks on furnishing a bond and meeting other conditions.
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including adherence to visa terms and regular reporting. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to facilitate the applicants' participation in their trial and discuss their cases with Bangladesh to possibly decide the matter without trial.
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail applications in the CrPC.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by the defense and prosecution and ultimately decides to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant while imposing certain conditions.
The Pakistan Hotels and Restaurants Act of 1976 aims to regulate standards of service and amenities for tourists in hotels and restaurants. Some key points:
- It establishes a Controller to oversee registration and licensing of hotels/restaurants, determine fair rates, and classify hotels based on star ratings according to minimum criteria.
- Hotels and restaurants must register and obtain a license annually by meeting health, safety and staffing requirements. Their registration/license can be cancelled if requirements are not met.
- It requires hotels and restaurants to report transfers of ownership and changes in operations. The Controller can set fair rates for services provided.
The document discusses two writ petitions challenging certain rules under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Specifically, it challenges Rules 3, 7, and 9 on the grounds that they infringe on freedom of speech and media independence. The court notes that Rule 9 has already been stayed by the Bombay High Court. It orders that any actions taken under Rules 3 and 7 will abide by the result of the present petitions and further court orders. The matters are listed to be heard again in late October.
Delhi hc shifa ur rehman judgment may 7ZahidManiyar
This document is a court judgment regarding a petition filed by Shifa-ur-Rehman, President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Milia Islamia, who was arrested in connection with an FIR related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The petition challenges an order extending the period of investigation and the petitioner's detention. The court heard arguments from both sides on issues such as whether the petitioner was denied the right to consult his lawyer and whether the reasons provided for extension were sufficient. The court considered the matter in light of relevant sections of the UAPA and precedents.
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Patna hc illegal migrants order aug 18ZahidManiyar
1) The Patna High Court reviewed an affidavit from the Bihar government about establishing detention centers for illegal foreign nationals outside of jail premises.
2) The affidavit stated that the government has approved a proposal to set up a temporary detention center at the Bihar Institute of Correctional Administration in Hajipur.
3) However, the court found the affidavit vague about the timeline for establishing detention centers and ensuring the temporary center has adequate infrastructure. It directed the government to file a fresh affidavit providing more details.
The document is a court order from the High Court of Jharkhand granting anticipatory bail to two petitioners, Haji Muhammad Tahir and Haji Muhammad Islam. The petitioners were coordinators of a mosque and are accused of failing to inform authorities about hosting foreign nationals and their activities. The court notes the petitioners' arguments and the fact that a similar case granted anticipatory bail. Considering the facts, the court grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners for six weeks on furnishing a bond and meeting other conditions.
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including adherence to visa terms and regular reporting. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to facilitate the applicants' participation in their trial and discuss their cases with Bangladesh to possibly decide the matter without trial.
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail applications in the CrPC.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by the defense and prosecution and ultimately decides to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant while imposing certain conditions.
The Pakistan Hotels and Restaurants Act of 1976 aims to regulate standards of service and amenities for tourists in hotels and restaurants. Some key points:
- It establishes a Controller to oversee registration and licensing of hotels/restaurants, determine fair rates, and classify hotels based on star ratings according to minimum criteria.
- Hotels and restaurants must register and obtain a license annually by meeting health, safety and staffing requirements. Their registration/license can be cancelled if requirements are not met.
- It requires hotels and restaurants to report transfers of ownership and changes in operations. The Controller can set fair rates for services provided.
The document discusses two writ petitions challenging certain rules under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021. Specifically, it challenges Rules 3, 7, and 9 on the grounds that they infringe on freedom of speech and media independence. The court notes that Rule 9 has already been stayed by the Bombay High Court. It orders that any actions taken under Rules 3 and 7 will abide by the result of the present petitions and further court orders. The matters are listed to be heard again in late October.
Delhi hc shifa ur rehman judgment may 7ZahidManiyar
This document is a court judgment regarding a petition filed by Shifa-ur-Rehman, President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Milia Islamia, who was arrested in connection with an FIR related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The petition challenges an order extending the period of investigation and the petitioner's detention. The court heard arguments from both sides on issues such as whether the petitioner was denied the right to consult his lawyer and whether the reasons provided for extension were sufficient. The court considered the matter in light of relevant sections of the UAPA and precedents.
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
1) The court heard arguments from the counsel for the applicant Mohd. Chand and the counsel for the state in a criminal case involving sections 153A, 295, 505, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.
2) The applicant was seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple.
3) The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with conditions including surrendering his passport, not contacting witnesses, and appearing for key court hearings.
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him in Crime No. 67 of 2020 registered under Sections 143 and 188 of IPC. The case of the prosecution was that the petitioner protested against the Citizenship Amendment Act along with others in a public road without permission. The court noted that taking cognizance under Section 188 requires a written complaint from a public servant, which was not present. Further, the charges against the petitioner were simple and trivial in nature. Considering this, the court allowed the petition and quashed the criminal proceedings.
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 11.05.2016Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India against Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai Bihar
Mp hc wp 12166 2021_final_order_06-sep-2021sabrangsabrang
The petitioner challenged his detention order on the grounds that it did not mention his right to make a representation against the order to the District Magistrate who issued the order, violating his rights under Article 22 of the Indian Constitution. The court referred to previous judgments which held that not informing a detainee of their right to make a representation to the detaining authority infringes on their Article 22 rights and renders the detention illegal. As the respondent admitted the detention order did not contain this stipulation, and in line with previous judgments, the court quashed the detention order and directed the petitioner be released.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwajsabrangsabrang
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
This document is a high court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by Babbar Khan challenging his detention order under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The key details are:
1) Babbar Khan claimed the detention order violated his constitutional rights and was based on false FIRs. However, the court found the detaining authority had provided Khan with copies of the detention order and grounds in Urdu and informed him of his right to make representations.
2) While personal liberty is a fundamental right, preventive detention is allowed under Article 22(5) to prevent threats to public order. The goal is to prevent future harm, not punish past actions.
3) The court dismissed Khan's petition
The High Court of Bombay heard a suo moto petition regarding under-trial prisoners in Maharashtra correctional homes. The Court directed the State to provide crime rate data after a recent lockdown order and to consider suggestions from an intervenor group on prisoner transfers. The State was given time to respond and submit a plan to decongest overcrowded prisons by shifting prisoners based on valid reasons, with any applications to be decided within 48 hours. The matter was adjourned to a future date for the State's responses.
The petitioner, a social worker dealing with child abuse cases, has filed a public interest litigation arguing that Section 40 of the POCSO Act and Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules, which provide for participation of victims in legal proceedings, are not being properly implemented. The petitioner contends that victims and their families are often not informed about bail applications and other matters in criminal cases under the POCSO Act. The petitioner seeks guidelines to ensure strict compliance of the victim participation provisions, and for Section 439(1-A) of the CrPC relating to informing victims about bail hearings to also apply to POCSO Act cases.
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
The document summarizes the key aspects of Bahrain's Labour Law:
1. It defines workers and employers and outlines the scope of application of the law, exempting certain categories like government employees, domestic servants, and temporary or casual workers.
2. Foreign workers cannot be employed without a valid Work Permit and Work Card issued by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, and foreign workers are subject to conditions like having a valid passport and residence permit.
3. The Minister of Labour and Social Affairs can cancel a foreign worker's Work Card if conditions are not met or their continued employment competes with national workers, subject to leaving indemnity being paid.
4. The Minister regulates Work Per
The court ordered the State Government to reconstitute the committee established to examine the problems faced by the Van Gujjar tribal community. The original committee was found to be inadequate as it did not include key authorities like the District Magistrate and Principal Secretary of Social Welfare Department as members. The reconstituted committee must include these authorities and consult the petitioner organization. It must meet monthly and submit a report within 3 months with recommendations on providing legal rights and addressing difficulties for the Van Gujjar community.
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
This document is a high court order regarding a writ petition filed by three widows seeking compensation for the death of their husbands who were manual scavengers. The court notes that manual scavenging is prohibited by law and those engaged in it are entitled to rehabilitation. It discusses the relevant laws and state government policies on compensation. While the state argues the developer and contractor should pay, the court observes the state also holds responsibility. It directs the government lawyer to immediately pay interim compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to each petitioner, while holding all respondents including the housing society responsible for fully paying the mandated Rs. 10 lakhs compensation per petitioner.
Extra Ordinary Family Pension or Ex-Gratia lump sum compensation to the widow whose husband died in an accident during a journey from his home town to the place of duty.
This document provides guidance on visa and migration services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) for foreign business partners and employees of AIFC Bodies and Participants.
It outlines the various visa categories available (business short-term, business long-term, work), and details the application process and required documents for each service offered. These services include obtaining an invitation letter, visa issuance/extension/renewal/cancellation, registration, tax services, and digital signatures.
The document also provides general instructions that clients must follow, such as only applying for visas through AEC and complying with Kazakhstan's migration laws. It explains the process for employers to establish an employment allocation for hiring foreign
This document provides guidance on services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) for foreign business partners and employees of AIFC Bodies and Participants. It outlines the general instructions for applying for AEC services and details the specific procedures and requirements for various services, including:
1. Visa services for short-term, long-term, and work visas. Requirements for visa invitation, issuance, extension, renewal, cancellation and category changes are provided.
2. Migration services including registration rules and procedures.
3. Tax services including procedures for obtaining tax identification numbers.
4. Obtaining an electronic digital signature for e-government services.
5. AEC
Present Guide is a detailed handbook covering all aspects of services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) to the foreign business partners and employees of the AIFC Bodies and Participants. It has been developed and compiled in accordance with the Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 7, 2015 "On the Astana International Financial Centre, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the AIFC Acts,
in order to manage the services obtained.
The Guide provides a comprehensive list of services, including the following details for each service:
• Definition and Description;
• Application process;
• Documents required to be submitted;
• Timeframe.
1) The court heard arguments from the counsel for the applicant Mohd. Chand and the counsel for the state in a criminal case involving sections 153A, 295, 505, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.
2) The applicant was seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple.
3) The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with conditions including surrendering his passport, not contacting witnesses, and appearing for key court hearings.
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him in Crime No. 67 of 2020 registered under Sections 143 and 188 of IPC. The case of the prosecution was that the petitioner protested against the Citizenship Amendment Act along with others in a public road without permission. The court noted that taking cognizance under Section 188 requires a written complaint from a public servant, which was not present. Further, the charges against the petitioner were simple and trivial in nature. Considering this, the court allowed the petition and quashed the criminal proceedings.
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 11.05.2016Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India against Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai Bihar
Mp hc wp 12166 2021_final_order_06-sep-2021sabrangsabrang
The petitioner challenged his detention order on the grounds that it did not mention his right to make a representation against the order to the District Magistrate who issued the order, violating his rights under Article 22 of the Indian Constitution. The court referred to previous judgments which held that not informing a detainee of their right to make a representation to the detaining authority infringes on their Article 22 rights and renders the detention illegal. As the respondent admitted the detention order did not contain this stipulation, and in line with previous judgments, the court quashed the detention order and directed the petitioner be released.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwajsabrangsabrang
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
This document is a high court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by Babbar Khan challenging his detention order under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. The key details are:
1) Babbar Khan claimed the detention order violated his constitutional rights and was based on false FIRs. However, the court found the detaining authority had provided Khan with copies of the detention order and grounds in Urdu and informed him of his right to make representations.
2) While personal liberty is a fundamental right, preventive detention is allowed under Article 22(5) to prevent threats to public order. The goal is to prevent future harm, not punish past actions.
3) The court dismissed Khan's petition
The High Court of Bombay heard a suo moto petition regarding under-trial prisoners in Maharashtra correctional homes. The Court directed the State to provide crime rate data after a recent lockdown order and to consider suggestions from an intervenor group on prisoner transfers. The State was given time to respond and submit a plan to decongest overcrowded prisons by shifting prisoners based on valid reasons, with any applications to be decided within 48 hours. The matter was adjourned to a future date for the State's responses.
The petitioner, a social worker dealing with child abuse cases, has filed a public interest litigation arguing that Section 40 of the POCSO Act and Rule 4 of the POCSO Rules, which provide for participation of victims in legal proceedings, are not being properly implemented. The petitioner contends that victims and their families are often not informed about bail applications and other matters in criminal cases under the POCSO Act. The petitioner seeks guidelines to ensure strict compliance of the victim participation provisions, and for Section 439(1-A) of the CrPC relating to informing victims about bail hearings to also apply to POCSO Act cases.
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
The document summarizes the key aspects of Bahrain's Labour Law:
1. It defines workers and employers and outlines the scope of application of the law, exempting certain categories like government employees, domestic servants, and temporary or casual workers.
2. Foreign workers cannot be employed without a valid Work Permit and Work Card issued by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, and foreign workers are subject to conditions like having a valid passport and residence permit.
3. The Minister of Labour and Social Affairs can cancel a foreign worker's Work Card if conditions are not met or their continued employment competes with national workers, subject to leaving indemnity being paid.
4. The Minister regulates Work Per
The court ordered the State Government to reconstitute the committee established to examine the problems faced by the Van Gujjar tribal community. The original committee was found to be inadequate as it did not include key authorities like the District Magistrate and Principal Secretary of Social Welfare Department as members. The reconstituted committee must include these authorities and consult the petitioner organization. It must meet monthly and submit a report within 3 months with recommendations on providing legal rights and addressing difficulties for the Van Gujjar community.
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
This document is a high court order regarding a writ petition filed by three widows seeking compensation for the death of their husbands who were manual scavengers. The court notes that manual scavenging is prohibited by law and those engaged in it are entitled to rehabilitation. It discusses the relevant laws and state government policies on compensation. While the state argues the developer and contractor should pay, the court observes the state also holds responsibility. It directs the government lawyer to immediately pay interim compensation of Rs. 1,25,000 to each petitioner, while holding all respondents including the housing society responsible for fully paying the mandated Rs. 10 lakhs compensation per petitioner.
Extra Ordinary Family Pension or Ex-Gratia lump sum compensation to the widow whose husband died in an accident during a journey from his home town to the place of duty.
This document provides guidance on visa and migration services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) for foreign business partners and employees of AIFC Bodies and Participants.
It outlines the various visa categories available (business short-term, business long-term, work), and details the application process and required documents for each service offered. These services include obtaining an invitation letter, visa issuance/extension/renewal/cancellation, registration, tax services, and digital signatures.
The document also provides general instructions that clients must follow, such as only applying for visas through AEC and complying with Kazakhstan's migration laws. It explains the process for employers to establish an employment allocation for hiring foreign
This document provides guidance on services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) for foreign business partners and employees of AIFC Bodies and Participants. It outlines the general instructions for applying for AEC services and details the specific procedures and requirements for various services, including:
1. Visa services for short-term, long-term, and work visas. Requirements for visa invitation, issuance, extension, renewal, cancellation and category changes are provided.
2. Migration services including registration rules and procedures.
3. Tax services including procedures for obtaining tax identification numbers.
4. Obtaining an electronic digital signature for e-government services.
5. AEC
Present Guide is a detailed handbook covering all aspects of services offered by the AIFC Expat Center (AEC) to the foreign business partners and employees of the AIFC Bodies and Participants. It has been developed and compiled in accordance with the Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 7, 2015 "On the Astana International Financial Centre, the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the AIFC Acts,
in order to manage the services obtained.
The Guide provides a comprehensive list of services, including the following details for each service:
• Definition and Description;
• Application process;
• Documents required to be submitted;
• Timeframe.
GENERAL SALES AGENCY- (draft)BangladeshKhaled Hasan
This document outlines a general sales agency agreement between Golden Myanmar Airlines and Euclid Ltd. Key points include:
- Euclid Ltd is appointed as the general sales agent for Golden Myanmar Airlines in Bangladesh, responsible for ticket sales and promotion.
- The agreement is valid from May 27, 2014 to May 26, 2016, unless terminated with 30 days notice.
- The duties of the agent include ticket sales, promotion, reporting, and appointing other travel agents to sell tickets.
- The agent is not paid commissions but is responsible for payments from other travel agents. Financial terms and indemnification are also covered.
2013 terms and _conditions_prize_draw_more_likes_more_nightsBeachcomber Hotels
This document outlines the terms and conditions of a prize draw promotion organized by New Mauritius Hotels Limited called "BEACHCOMBER PRIZE DRAW: More likes, more Nights". The promotion will run from September 28th to 30th, 2013 on Facebook where participants can like a Beachcomber Hotels post to enter. Prizes include stays at Sainte Anne Resort & Spa in the Seychelles ranging from 4 to 7 nights depending on the number of Facebook likes. To be eligible, participants must be over 13, except for employees of the organizer and their families. The winner will be selected in a random draw and have 90 days to claim their prize.
The contract is between VT Systems Participações Ltda as the client and BLUMAR BRAZIL NUTS RIO TURISMO LTDA as the service provider. The service provider will intermediate hotel services for an event in Rio de Janeiro from April 9-12, 2013. The service provider will receive total payment of R$8,484 for booking two apartments. The contract outlines obligations for both parties, including cancellation policies and payment terms. Failure to meet obligations could result in penalties or contract termination.
The document outlines the terms and conditions for Magic Electricity Box's professional grant writing services, which include a monthly retainer fee of $400 for 10 hours of services per month. Key details include:
- A 6 month minimum contract term for $2400 total
- Services include grant research, review, proposal/application development and writing
- No guarantees of successful grant/funding awards but refunds offered for rejected compliant applications
- Applications must be submitted by deadlines with complete information provided by clients
- Additional hourly fees may apply for work over the 10 hours or for emergency requests
- Expenses like postage or travel are extra and must be approved by clients
The document describes a program to purchase Brazilian Letra do Tesouro Nacional bonds (LTNs) from owners at approximately 18% of maturity value. It outlines the required documents for bond owners to submit their bonds for review. If approved, the program manager uses its own funds to navigate the proprietary steps to get the bonds listed on Euroclear for sale to pre-arranged buyers, with settlement of funds going to the bond owner within 3 days.
DATA PURCHASE AGREEMENT FORMAT
FREE LEGAL AND ACCOUNTANT FORMATS
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Meet Rixton in London - Terms and ConditionsDeezer-Comps
This document outlines the terms and conditions for a competition to meet the band Rixton in London. It provides details on:
1) The competition is organized by Blogmusik SAS and is open to UK residents aged 16 and over from July 3-7, 2014 on Twitter.
2) To enter, participants must follow @DeezerUK on Twitter, tweet the name of the TV show Jake from Rixton's dad is famous for, and mention @DeezerUK and #RixtonDeezer.
3) One winner will be randomly selected to receive a pair of tickets and meet and greet to see Rixton in London on July 9. Reserve winners will also be selected.
One Direction: Where We Are Terms and ConditionsDeezer-Comps
This document outlines the terms and conditions of a competition to win tickets to see the One Direction film "Where We Are - The Concert Film". The competition is open to UK residents aged 16 and over from October 6-9, 2014. To enter, participants must follow @DeezerUK on Twitter and tweet the name of the One Direction tour featured in the film along with @DeezerUK and #1DWWAFILM. Six winners will be selected at random on October 9 to receive a pair of tickets to see the film at an Odeon cinema of their choice.
This document is an application for leasing an instrument. It requests information from applicants such as personal details, company details, bank details, and intended use of the instrument. It outlines the process for leasing the instrument, including delivery procedures, payment terms, and signatures required from both the lessor and lessee.
Executive order on betting and online casinos_Danish Gaming Authority (DGA) r...Market Engel SAS
The document establishes regulations for online betting and casinos in Denmark, including requirements for:
1) Player registration with verification of personal information;
2) Establishing a gaming account for deposits, withdrawals, and transaction records;
3) Responsible gaming functions like deposit limits, automatic transfers of large winnings, and self-exclusion options;
4) Storing player data and financial transactions for 5 years and keeping funds in protected accounts.
Sennheiser Xmas - Terms and ConditionsDeezer-Comps
This document outlines the terms and conditions of a competition to win Sennheiser Urbanite headphones hosted by Blogmusik SAS on their Twitter accounts @DeezerUK and @DeezerIreland between December 1-7, 2014. To enter, participants must follow the appropriate Twitter account and retweet a tweet about the competition. Two winners will be selected randomly on December 8 and notified by Twitter direct message within 24 hours. Winners will receive a pair of Sennheiser Urbanite headphones and must provide their postal address to receive the prize, which will be sent by Royal Mail.
This document summarizes Hungarian legal regulations regarding travel contracts and package travel. It outlines key elements that must be included in travel contracts such as pre-contractual information about the parties, financial protection, travel package details, and contractual terms. Regulations addressed include allowable contract and price changes, payment terms, minimum participation requirements, and conditions for termination by customers or organizers. The purpose is to standardize information provided to customers and terms of the contractual relationship in the travel industry.
This document outlines the terms and conditions of a competition organized by Blogmusik SAS. It states that the competition is open to residents of Ireland aged 18 or older with an active Deezer subscription. Entrants must submit their full name, email, and phone number on the Deezer competition page by the closing date of August 27th, 2012 to be eligible. Two winners will be selected by random draw and will each receive a pair of weekend camping tickets to Electric Picnic worth €460.
AIMC Australian Visas - Migration agent and Migration consultant in Melbourne Australia. We are specialized in migration to Australia offer a range of visa and migration services. For more details
Visit: http://www.aimcaustralianvisas.com.au
This document outlines the terms and conditions for a competition called "Meet The Vamps" hosted by Blogmusik SAS between April 14-21, 2014 on Twitter. It specifies that the competition is open to UK and Ireland residents aged 16+, with one entry per person. The winner will receive a pair of tickets and meet & greet passes to a Vamps concert of their choice, as well as Vamps merchandise goodie bags. The terms also cover participant requirements, winner selection process, use of personal data, intellectual property rights, and dispute resolution.
This document outlines the terms and conditions of a competition to win tickets to see 981 Heritage in London hosted on Twitter by DeezerUK from June 27 to July 4, 2014. To enter, participants must follow DeezerUK and 981festival on Twitter, tweet the name of a performing artist with @DeezerUK and #Deezer981. One winner will be randomly selected to receive Sonos speakers and tickets. Reserve winners will be selected in case the winner cannot be contacted. Personal data may be collected and used for the competition. The terms can be modified and the competition cancelled at any time by the organizer.
Terms & conditions I Instagram Black Friday Giveaway I eBayebayGreece
1. The document outlines the terms and conditions of an Instagram contest run by Curious Ahead from November 18-23, 2020 to promote eBay.
2. Participants must be over 18, reside in Greece, and follow contest instructions to leave comments mentioning other users for a chance to win one of three prizes - a $50 or two $25 eBay coupons.
3. Winners will be selected randomly from eligible comments and notified via Instagram by November 30th. No cash substitutes for prizes are allowed.
With the American Airlines name change policy, you can alter the incorrect name on your flight ticket/boarding pass without any fuss. Therefore, it’s essential to understand the major guidelines before requesting a name change/correction. However, if you still encounter any issues, you can navigate to the AA website or approach the airline over the phone. Additionally, you can talk with a flight expert at +1-866-738-0741 to get your problem fixed in a few minutes.
A list of budget-friendly things that families can do in San Antonio! Dive into its rich history and vibrant culture at iconic landmarks like the Alamo. Explore colorful Market Square and stroll along the scenic River Walk. Enjoy family-friendly fun at Brackenridge Park and capture breathtaking views at the Tower of the Americas—all without breaking the bank!
How Does Allegiant Air Name Change Policy Work.pptxFlying Rules
Allegiant Air name change policy provides a straightforward and flexible workflow for requesting a name change/correction on the ticket. However, if you encounter any problems or have doubts, you can get in touch with the airline’s customer support. Furthermore, you can reach out to a consolidation desk at +1-800-865-1848 for immediate assistance.
visit at: https://www.flyingrules.com/name-change/allegiant-air-name-change-policy
Explore Austin's dynamic history and cultural tapestry on a captivating journey. From its origins as Texas' capital to architectural marvels like the Texas State Capitol and cultural hubs such as the Driskill Hotel. Dive into its diverse heritage, legendary music scene, key historical moments, natural beauty, and vibrant culinary delights.
Embark on an unforgettable journey to Goa, India,GoaDarling
Embark on an unforgettable journey to Goa, India, a captivating destination brimming with vibrant culture, pristine beaches, and culinary delights. Whether you're planning a College Group trip to Goa or seeking the perfect Goa tour package for family, this enchanting locale promises an experience like no other
The 09 Days Tour to Skardu by road offers a breathtaking journey through some of Pakistan’s most spectacular landscapes. Skardu, nestled in the heart of the Karakoram mountain range, is renowned for its stunning vistas, crystal-clear lakes, and rugged terrain.
Traveling with Frontier Airlines through Boston Logan International Airport offers a budget-friendly and efficient experience. With the modern facilities at Terminal C, extensive services, and amenities provided by Frontier, passengers can enjoy a comfortable journey. Whether you're a frequent flyer or a first-time traveler, this guide aims to help you navigate BOS with ease and make the most of your trip.
Our Bahrain Visa PowerPoint Presentation offers a detailed and comprehensive guide to the Bahrain visa application process. It is designed to assist travelers, travel agents, and businesses in navigating the various visa types, including tourist, business, work, student, and family visas. Each section provides an in-depth look at eligibility criteria, required documents, and step-by-step application procedures. Additionally, the presentation includes valuable tips for avoiding common application mistakes, an overview of processing times, and details on fees and payment methods. This presentation aims to ensure a smooth and successful visa application experience, making travel to Bahrain as seamless as possible.
Discover the exhilarating world of manta ray night snorkeling in Kona, Hawaii. Led by expert guides, participants witness these majestic creatures feeding on plankton under mesmerizing underwater lights. With stringent safety measures, environmental responsibility, and emergency preparedness, enjoy this unique adventure responsibly and securely with trusted tour operators.
1. Offer for rendering of informational service
1. General Provisions
1.1. This Offer is a formal proposition of “Hunters for luck” Ltd, hereinafter
referred to as the Executor. This Offer concerns rendering of advertising services and
proposes to sign a Contract for rendering of informational services on terms of this Offer.
1.2. In accordance with Item 2 Article 437 of Civil Code of Russian Federation
this document is a public Offer. In case when an individual or a legal person accepts the
following terms of the Contract and payment for services by “Hunters for luck” Ltd (makes
an Acceptance of this Offer), this person is considered as a Customer (Item 3 Article 438
Сivil Code of Russian Federation).
2. Notions and Definitions.
2.1. Offer is a business proposal made by the person for one or several
persons, which is definitely aimed at signing the Contract with the offeree, with the
indicated necessary terms.
Acceptance is an absolute acceptance of terms of the Contract.
2.2. Site is a whole set of electronic documents (files), which an individual
person or an organization possesses in the computer network. These documents are
combined with one Internet address/domain name – www.huntersforluck.com
2.3. Information services are services rendered by the Executor, which are
connected with putting the Customer's advertising materials in the Internet on the site
www.huntersforluck.com
2.4. Rules- the conditions of putting the advertising and informational
materials in the site by the Customer.
2.5. Customer is a person, who made the Acceptance of the Offer. This
person is a Customer for the information services on the site www.huntersforluck.com with
the signed Contract.
2.6. Materials are the advertising and informational materials, information
about services, which the Customer performs. This information should not contradict the
2. contents of the site. The materials are put in form of text, text and graphiс сells, fotos and
banners.
2.7. Tourist is an Internet user, a person who performs a temporary trip to
another country or to an area which is not considered as a permanent residence for the Tourist.
The period of a trip can be from 24 hours to 6 months during a calendar year.
2.8. Tour is a rendering of service by the Customer in the field of hunting and
fishing arrangement, visiting national parks and nature reserves, country- and ecotourism.
2.9. Commission is a payment for realization of the commercial operations
and transactions. It is usually calculated in per cents from the amount of transaction.
3. Subject of the Contract.
3.1. The subject of this Offer is an onerous rendering of information services
by the Executor for the Customer in compliance with terms of this Offer.
4. The Executor's duties.
4.1. The Executor puts the Customer's informational and advertising materials
free in the Internet in the site www.huntersforluck.com
4.2. The Executor gives the possibility to the Customer to put and edit the
materials in the site www.huntersforluck.com
4.3. The Rules of putting the information in the site www.huntersforluck.com
by the Customer.
4.3.1. All information, put by the Customer in the site, should be reliable and
precise, it should include price for the rendered services.
4.3.2. The Customer must put the information, which corresponds only to the
contents of the site.
4.3.3. The Customer puts the information concerning only hunting and fishing
grounds, properties and estates, which are located within the territory of his country. The
Customer should also indicate the routes of ecotourism. The Customer can put the materials
concerning other countries only in case, if he possesses hunting and fishing grounds there or
he has his own tour routes in ecotourism there.
4.3.4. It is prohibited to put on the site links with other information, which does
not correspond to the contents of the site.
4.3.5. The Executor has a right to refuse the registration without explanation or
to demand the documents from the Customer, which confirm his right to put the information
in the site.
3. 4.4. The Rules of formation/booking of the Tourist's trip.
4.4.1. The Executor gives a possibility to a Tourist to fill in the Application of
booking in the site www.huntersforluck.com. The Tourist should indicate his passport data,
the period of hunting/fishing (the number of days), the desired catch (to indicate the species of
animals or fish) and price of the tour/package tour.
4.4.2. The Executor sends this application to the Customer by e-mail, Skype or
by fax in order to get the confirmation of tour booking.
4.4.3. The Customer informs the Executor at e-mail, Skype or fax about
possibility of booking. The Customer indicates time of payment for the tour, presents the rules
and conditions of hunting and fishing, informs about possible supplementary conditions,
danger, insurance against accidents and transportation of trophies out of the country.
4.4.4. The Executor informs the Tourist about confirmation of the tour, methods
of payment, rules and terms of making a trip.
4.4.5. The Tourist can pay for Customer’s services in the following way:
─ the Customer withdraws from the Tourist’s credit card the sum, necessary for
booking of the tour, if he has corresponding authorities for such actions;
─ the Tourist himself pays to the Customer on the ground of account or another
payment document, rendered by the Customer through the settlement account, bank
transfer, credit cards, electronic payment systems as PayPal, Webmoney, QIWI and
other convenient for the Customer systems;
─ If necessary the Tourist pays a deposit to the Customer within the terms defined by
the Customer. The Tourist does the final payment prior or after his arrival. The
method of payment is agreed with the Customer.
4.4.6. The Tourist transmits his money to the Customer's account and on arrival
in the place signs necessary documents with the Customer.
4.4.7. After receipt of full amount of money, the Customer informs the Executor
about this and pays him a Commission, which amounts to 10 % of the tour price. The tour
price must include the Commission. Any tour price, put in the site www.huntersforluck.com,
must coincide with the Customer's tour price.
4.4.8. In case if the Customer does not pay the Commission or breaks payment
period, the Executor has a right to delete the Customer's informational materials on the site
www.huntersforluck.com.
4.4.9. The Executor has a right to hide the fields with the Customer's address, e-
mail and telephone number. This information is given to the Tourist after filling in the
application and booking of a tour.
4.5. To simplify use of the site www.huntersforluck.com, the Executor puts there a video
instruction in Russian, English and German languages.
5. The Customer's duties.
4. 5.1. The Customer must observe the rules of putting the informational
materials in the site www.huntersforluck.com
5.2. The Customer must observe the rules of tour booking.
5.3. The Customer must pay in time the Commission to the Executor for his
rendered services.
5.4. The Customer must inform the Executor at e-mail, Skype or fax, that he
transferred the Commission to the Executor's account.
5.5. The Customer should send his wishes and comments concerning
cooperation at e-mail info@huntersforluck.com , support@huntersforluck.com
6. The responsibility of Parties.
6.1. The Executor is not responsible for Customer's actions in relations with the
Tourist. The signed Agreement between the Customer and the Tourist defines their relations.
6.2. In case if the Tourist rejects to use the Customer's service due to various
circumstances after payment to the latter, the Executor does not return a Commission to the
the Customer.
6.3. The Customer solves all problems and points at issue between him and the
Tourist by himself.
6.4. The Customer is responsible for reliability of materials, put in site
www.huntersforluck.com. The Customer is responsible for conformity of his informational
materials with the demands of Federal Law of Russian Federation «Advertising», for
conformity of his informational materials with the Legislation of the countries, where the
Customer carries out his commercial activity and renders the advertising services.
6.5. The Customer is responsible to third parties for the contents and kind of
advertisement, for the rendered service.
6.6. The Customer guarantees, that at putting the materials the Customer does
not infringe copy and allied rights of third parties, including ownership copy and allied rights,
and also inalienable personal non-property rights.
6.7. In case if there are complaints concerning infringement of copyright by
the Executor, the Customer adjusts the dispute by himself and for his own account.
6.8. In case if there are disputes concerning the relations, following from
this Contract, the parties must adjust the disputes by negotiations.
6.9. The Executor is not responsible for direct or indirect damage, caused to the
Customer due to use or disuse of services and for damage, caused due to mistakes.
5. 6.10. The Customer bears responsibility for his login and password, for
damages, caused due to its unauthorized use.
7. Cost of services and procedure of payment.
7.1. All calculations concerning the Contract are made in Russian rubles
(RUB), US dollars (USD) or euro (EUR), subject to the Customer's country location.
7.2. The Customer should pay the Commission during one month after the
Tourist had paid completely for the tour.
7.3. The payment should be transferred to one of the Executor's settlement
accounts, subject to the kind of currency or through the Payment Systems: PayPal,
Webmoney, QIWI.
7.4. The Customer informs the Executor about the paid Commission at e-mail
info@huntersforluck.com , support@huntersforluck.com
8. Acceptance of the Offer and signing the Contract.
8.1. The Customer makes Acceptance of the Offer by way of putting his
informational materials in the website www.huntersforluck.com., in relation to which the
Contract is signed during the period of Acceptance, taking into consideration terms of Item 7
of this Offer.
9. The period of Contract validity and alteration of the Contract.
9.1. This Offer comes into effect since the moment of its signing by the
Customer (Item 8.1.) and functions with no fixed term.
9.2. The Executor has a right to alter terms of the Offer or to withdraw the
Offer at any time his own way. In case if the Executor alters the Offer, these alterations come
into effect since the moment of their publication, if other period of their coming into effect is
not fixed at the publication.
10. Cancellation of the Contract.
10.1. The Contract can be early cancelled:
10.1.1. under the agreement of Parties at any time;
10.1.2. by the Customer unilaterally in case if the Customer does not accept a new
version of the Contract. The Customer must inform the Executor about this 10 days
before the date of Contract cancellation;
10.1.3. on the ground, provided by the Legislation of Russian Federation.
6. 11. Other terms.
11.1. The Parties agree to consider the Contract signed in electronic form and to
consider it legally operative, when it is certified with electronic and digital signature by both
Parties, if the Customer has such signature.
11.2. The Parties must keep all information received from each other in a secret.
The Parties must not disclose and lay open to the public such information. The Parties must
not give the information to third persons without preliminary written authorization of the
Party, which provides with the information.
11.3. In case if some Party changes its address or Essential Elements, it is
necessary to inform another Party about this in written form during 3 days since the moment
of changes.
12. The Essential Elements
The Executor The Customer
INN(TaxPayerNumber)4345313393
KPP(TaxRegistrationReasonCode)434501001
OGRN(PrincipalStateRegistrationNumber)1114345037620
SettlementAccount40702810700000192048
CurrencyAccount(EUR,inRussia)40702978500000182048
CurrencyAccount(USD,inRussia)40702840900000182048
ToOpenJointStockCompanyCommercialbank“Hlynov”inKirov
CorrespondentAccount30101810100000000711
BIN(BankIdentificationNumber)043304711
ChiefExecutiveOfficer–KolbinAndreyYurevich