Pros and Cons of
Open Educational
Resources
By Ursula H.
Quality Issues
 Quality assurance is not guaranteed
 Information can be tangential and requires
careful review by instructor
However:
 Greater access to quality choices from various
universities
 Standard might be improved by gathering of
more contributors
 Allows for peer review
Perception by Users
 Students might use OER’s more because they
appear (and sometimes are) more interactive
 OER’s make use – and indirectly teach –
current technology
However:
 OER courses can be misunderstood as
providing degrees, diplomas, etc. when this is
not an option
Economic Matters
 Costs are minimal or nonexistent
 OER’s offer more access to quality choices for
more students
 Educational choices are made available to
more students
Accessibility
 OER’s require reliable access to internet
 This is challenging in technologically
underserved areas
However:
 Those areas probably don’t have academic
brick-and-mortar infrastructure either – OER’s
are potentially more accessible
 Course content is available for more extended
periods of time
Licensing & Copyright Issues
 Terms can be confusing for users (think “cage-
free” compared to “free-range”)
 The non-revocable nature of Creative
Commons licenses can become an issue
 The OER-concept can be perceived as a threat
to the ownership of intellectual property
Academic Matters
 Authors/faculty have access to a wider
audience for their work
 OER’s can function as showcases for research
 Enhancement of learning institutions’
reputation as well as that of instructors
 Best practice approaches can be shared
worldwide
Current and Future Challenges
 Sustainability of sites offering OER’s is not yet
guaranteed
 OER’s are not yet widely understood by the
public, students, and instructors alike
 Research needs to be conducted to evaluate
learning results

The Pros and Cons of Open Educational Resources

  • 1.
    Pros and Consof Open Educational Resources By Ursula H.
  • 2.
    Quality Issues  Qualityassurance is not guaranteed  Information can be tangential and requires careful review by instructor However:  Greater access to quality choices from various universities  Standard might be improved by gathering of more contributors  Allows for peer review
  • 3.
    Perception by Users Students might use OER’s more because they appear (and sometimes are) more interactive  OER’s make use – and indirectly teach – current technology However:  OER courses can be misunderstood as providing degrees, diplomas, etc. when this is not an option
  • 4.
    Economic Matters  Costsare minimal or nonexistent  OER’s offer more access to quality choices for more students  Educational choices are made available to more students
  • 5.
    Accessibility  OER’s requirereliable access to internet  This is challenging in technologically underserved areas However:  Those areas probably don’t have academic brick-and-mortar infrastructure either – OER’s are potentially more accessible  Course content is available for more extended periods of time
  • 6.
    Licensing & CopyrightIssues  Terms can be confusing for users (think “cage- free” compared to “free-range”)  The non-revocable nature of Creative Commons licenses can become an issue  The OER-concept can be perceived as a threat to the ownership of intellectual property
  • 7.
    Academic Matters  Authors/facultyhave access to a wider audience for their work  OER’s can function as showcases for research  Enhancement of learning institutions’ reputation as well as that of instructors  Best practice approaches can be shared worldwide
  • 8.
    Current and FutureChallenges  Sustainability of sites offering OER’s is not yet guaranteed  OER’s are not yet widely understood by the public, students, and instructors alike  Research needs to be conducted to evaluate learning results