This document is a site suitability report submitted by Dufresne-Henry to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection for a proposed 4.6-acre expansion (Phase 5B) of the Northampton Sanitary Landfill located off Glendale Road in Northampton, MA. The report provides background on the landfill and expansion proposal, describes the proposed expansion area, and requests a waiver from the site assignment criteria prohibiting landfill development in a Zone II for a public water supply well.
Final seia report english opened for public comments newlbrlbo
This document provides a supplementary environmental impact assessment report for the proposed Colombo Port City development project in Sri Lanka. The 269-hectare reclamation project aims to develop a new financial hub as part of the Western Region Megapolis plan. Extensive studies were conducted to characterize the existing physical, ecological and socioeconomic environment that could be affected. The assessment addresses bathymetry, coastal processes, water quality, biodiversity including corals and fisheries, and ambient air quality. It also provides details of the proposed reclamation design and land use plan as well as measures to manage potential environmental impacts.
Part of 2 of 2 from a successful application to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to grant a waiver and permit the Northampton municipal landfill to expand in a Water Supply Protection District (and the recharge area of the Barnes Aquifer).
Public policy analysis on waste managementPhIee PoeRba
This document analyzes waste management policies in Malang City, Indonesia using a public policy analysis framework. It identifies several alternative policies: (1) sanitary landfills, (2) decentralized waste management involving the private sector, (3) converting waste to energy, and (4) garbage banks. Each alternative is evaluated based on costs, infrastructure requirements, community empowerment, technology needs, and human resource quality. The document recommends combining elements of sanitary landfills and garbage banks due to high costs of landfills and need for community involvement. Preparing for foreign investor cooperation could help realize optimized waste management solutions.
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang ancaman sampah terhadap deforestasi mangrove dan krisis sumber daya laut di Pulau Serangan, khususnya di Denpasar Selatan, Bali. Dokumen ini menjelaskan tentang penelitian lapangan yang dilakukan di tiga lokasi yaitu TPA Suwung, Desa Pulau Serangan, dan Mangrove Information Centre untuk mengetahui dampak sampah terhadap mangrove dan sumber daya laut."
This document examines landfill leachate management practices in Ireland. It finds that while landfill practices have improved, co-treating leachate with municipal wastewater poses challenges. Studies of two WWTPs showed leachate loading regimes were generally appropriate but seasonal variation in leachate volumes risks overloading plants. Nitrogen loading from leachate needs consideration and on-site storage is recommended to minimize risks to WWTP performance.
The First ever state of the art sanitary landfill of Sri LankaTharindu Dilshan
This document discusses the sanitary landfill project in Dompe, Sri Lanka. It provides background on solid waste management issues in Sri Lanka, including that the country generates over 6,000 tons of waste per day but only collects around 2,700 tons. It then describes the "Pilisaru" National Solid Waste Management Project and the plan to establish Sri Lanka's first sanitary landfill in Dompe as a pilot project. The document outlines the design of the landfill, including liner systems, leachate collection, gas recovery, and monitoring systems. It notes there was public protest against the landfill but also awareness programs. The document discusses pros and cons of the project and provides recommendations.
This document outlines the key processes and activities involved in sanitary engineered landfill operations including: construction activities like earthworks, geosynthetic installation and final capping; operation activities like waste deposition, leachate and gas management; environmental monitoring of groundwater, surface water, leachate and gas; planning and design of the landfill layout and systems; and maintenance.
DESIGN A LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR A SMALL CAMP SANITARY LANDFILLIAEME Publication
Sanitary landfill is still the most cost-effective and appropriate method for waste disposal in Iraq. The municipal solid waste has high moisture content of about 49.1% and density of 162.6 kg/m3. The organic fraction reaches about 79%. Based on the studies and reports of study area, the average waste generation rate was 0.45 kg/capita/day. The design of the base liner, leachate collection system, and final cover system for the study area landfill is described in this paper. Since the landfill is located in an arid environment, leachate generation is low and potential infiltration through the lining system is minimal. A 250 mm diameter drainage pipes have longitudinal slope 1% to reduce sedimentation and allow adequate flow capacity.
Final seia report english opened for public comments newlbrlbo
This document provides a supplementary environmental impact assessment report for the proposed Colombo Port City development project in Sri Lanka. The 269-hectare reclamation project aims to develop a new financial hub as part of the Western Region Megapolis plan. Extensive studies were conducted to characterize the existing physical, ecological and socioeconomic environment that could be affected. The assessment addresses bathymetry, coastal processes, water quality, biodiversity including corals and fisheries, and ambient air quality. It also provides details of the proposed reclamation design and land use plan as well as measures to manage potential environmental impacts.
Part of 2 of 2 from a successful application to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to grant a waiver and permit the Northampton municipal landfill to expand in a Water Supply Protection District (and the recharge area of the Barnes Aquifer).
Public policy analysis on waste managementPhIee PoeRba
This document analyzes waste management policies in Malang City, Indonesia using a public policy analysis framework. It identifies several alternative policies: (1) sanitary landfills, (2) decentralized waste management involving the private sector, (3) converting waste to energy, and (4) garbage banks. Each alternative is evaluated based on costs, infrastructure requirements, community empowerment, technology needs, and human resource quality. The document recommends combining elements of sanitary landfills and garbage banks due to high costs of landfills and need for community involvement. Preparing for foreign investor cooperation could help realize optimized waste management solutions.
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang ancaman sampah terhadap deforestasi mangrove dan krisis sumber daya laut di Pulau Serangan, khususnya di Denpasar Selatan, Bali. Dokumen ini menjelaskan tentang penelitian lapangan yang dilakukan di tiga lokasi yaitu TPA Suwung, Desa Pulau Serangan, dan Mangrove Information Centre untuk mengetahui dampak sampah terhadap mangrove dan sumber daya laut."
This document examines landfill leachate management practices in Ireland. It finds that while landfill practices have improved, co-treating leachate with municipal wastewater poses challenges. Studies of two WWTPs showed leachate loading regimes were generally appropriate but seasonal variation in leachate volumes risks overloading plants. Nitrogen loading from leachate needs consideration and on-site storage is recommended to minimize risks to WWTP performance.
The First ever state of the art sanitary landfill of Sri LankaTharindu Dilshan
This document discusses the sanitary landfill project in Dompe, Sri Lanka. It provides background on solid waste management issues in Sri Lanka, including that the country generates over 6,000 tons of waste per day but only collects around 2,700 tons. It then describes the "Pilisaru" National Solid Waste Management Project and the plan to establish Sri Lanka's first sanitary landfill in Dompe as a pilot project. The document outlines the design of the landfill, including liner systems, leachate collection, gas recovery, and monitoring systems. It notes there was public protest against the landfill but also awareness programs. The document discusses pros and cons of the project and provides recommendations.
This document outlines the key processes and activities involved in sanitary engineered landfill operations including: construction activities like earthworks, geosynthetic installation and final capping; operation activities like waste deposition, leachate and gas management; environmental monitoring of groundwater, surface water, leachate and gas; planning and design of the landfill layout and systems; and maintenance.
DESIGN A LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR A SMALL CAMP SANITARY LANDFILLIAEME Publication
Sanitary landfill is still the most cost-effective and appropriate method for waste disposal in Iraq. The municipal solid waste has high moisture content of about 49.1% and density of 162.6 kg/m3. The organic fraction reaches about 79%. Based on the studies and reports of study area, the average waste generation rate was 0.45 kg/capita/day. The design of the base liner, leachate collection system, and final cover system for the study area landfill is described in this paper. Since the landfill is located in an arid environment, leachate generation is low and potential infiltration through the lining system is minimal. A 250 mm diameter drainage pipes have longitudinal slope 1% to reduce sedimentation and allow adequate flow capacity.
Dokumen tersebut membahas rekomendasi desain dan lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) sanitary landfill di Kabupaten Kota. Beberapa pertimbangan yang dijelaskan mencakup aksesibilitas, curah hujan, geologi, hidrologi, serta persepsi sosial ekonomi masyarakat setempat. Dilakukan pula analisis kelayakan lokasi berdasarkan aspek teknis, lingkungan, dan sosial untuk memastikan kesesuaian lokasi.
Leachate management of Constructed wetlands_Yuka Ogata_National Institute for...CRL Asia
The document summarizes a lecture on using constructed wetlands for landfill leachate management. It describes what landfill leachate is, current methods for leachate management including collection and treatment, and introduces constructed wetlands as a natural treatment method. It then outlines a research study at a landfill site in Thailand evaluating the use of a pilot-scale constructed wetland for leachate treatment. The wetland showed good plant growth, 53% water reduction through evapotranspiration, and 51-69% removal of total solids, total carbon, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen.
Environmental Impact Assessment of Sentosa Integrated ResortNovember Tan
An assignment for a class on Environmental Management and Assessment, we are asked to conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment on the reclamation on Sentosa island for the construction of a integrated resort.
It is important to note that this is in many ways a hypothetical EIA. There were assumptions made and we did NOT do any baseline surveys or studies. Information were all taken from other sources and projected for this site.
Landfill leachate varies widely in composition, it usually contains both dissolved and suspended material. The generation of leachate is caused principally by precipitation percolating through waste deposited in a landfill. As leachate first emerges, it can be black in colour, anoxic, and possibly effervescent, with dissolved and entrained gases.
How to Make a Photo Collage with PowerPointJohanna Riddle
The document provides instructions for creating a photo collage in PowerPoint. It guides the reader to insert images onto a blank slide, resize and rearrange the photos, select a background image, remove backgrounds from photos, add word art, and save the completed collage. The instructions are broken into steps with screenshots to demonstrate how to move, size, layer, and style the images. The overall collage is tied together with an overlay photo and words are added before saving the final product.
This document discusses methods for treating landfill leachate. Leachate is produced as water percolates through waste in a landfill. It contains high levels of organic and inorganic contaminants. The main goals of leachate treatment are to reduce environmental impacts and meet regulatory discharge standards. Common treatment methods include biological processes like aerobic and anaerobic treatment, as well as physical/chemical processes such as coagulation, flocculation, adsorption, and membrane filtration. Often, a combination of treatment methods is needed to sufficiently reduce contaminants in leachate before discharge or reuse.
Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit- Unit IIIGAURAV. H .TANDON
This document provides an overview of environmental impact assessments and environmental audits. It defines environmental impact assessment as the systematic identification and evaluation of potential impacts of proposed projects on the natural environment. The key steps of an EIA include organizing an interdisciplinary team, performing an assessment of the site and potential impacts, writing an environmental impact statement, and reviewing the EIS. Environmental audits evaluate an organization's environmental performance and position and identify ways to improve environmental management systems. The document outlines the basic components and steps in conducting environmental audits.
This document provides a Phase IV completion statement, remedy operation status opinion, and substantial hazard evaluation for the former Mobil Service Station located at 99 Worcester Road in Natick, Massachusetts. It details the implementation of enhanced bioremediation using BOS 200 injections to address soil and groundwater contamination. Groundwater monitoring results indicate that concentrations of contaminants of concern have decreased significantly since injection. The report concludes that no substantial hazards exist at the site and that monitored natural attenuation can now address any remaining contamination.
The Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden Agricultural Society & City of Northampton are requesting an amendment to the Final Order of Conditions for the redevelopment of the Three County Fairgrounds. The amendment seeks to clarify the scope of work for Phase 1 of the project which includes relocating show rings, adding a promenade, installing additional stormwater infrastructure, and expanding site utilities and gravel surfacing. While the overall master plan has not changed, the specific scope of Phase 1 has been modified after further consideration of feasibility and construction sequencing. The amendment requests the Conservation Commission approve these additions to Phase 1.
Governor Paterson's Recovery Cabinet will host workshops throughout New York to discuss the second round of broadband stimulus funding from the NTIA and RUS programs. The workshops will highlight changes to the NOFA and encourage partnerships and comprehensive solutions to improve broadband access. State and local agencies, non-profits, libraries, and broadband providers are invited to attend to apply for funding, which will be awarded on a rolling basis beginning in June 2010.
The document summarizes a public meeting to present and get feedback on an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed William J. Carroll Government Center project in Solano County. The meeting covered an overview of the project, an explanation of the environmental review process under CEQA, highlights from the IS/MND including the resource areas evaluated and potential impacts found to be less than significant with mitigation, next steps in the CEQA process, and an invitation for public comments on the IS/MND.
The Alachua County Environmental Protection Department (ACEPD) has reviewed Beazer East's Short Term Interim Measures Workplan for the Koppers Superfund site. ACEPD has several concerns about the proposed stormwater and dust control measures. Specifically, ACEPD is concerned that the proposed raking and discing operations could mix and dilute contaminated soils. ACEPD also notes that additional contaminants beyond arsenic, copper and chromium may be present in stormwater. ACEPD requests that its comments be addressed before approval of the stormwater permit application.
The report summarizes groundwater, surface water, and leachate monitoring data collected between April 2009 and March 2010 at the Hartland landfill and surrounding area. Key findings include: (1) Groundwater flow patterns were consistent with previous years, with some northward and southeastward flow captured by purge wells. (2) Groundwater quality showed contained leachate impacts. (3) Elevated parameters near the Hartland North Pad indicated ongoing impacts from historical composting and current aggregate stockpiling. Water quality is closely monitored.
The Morris County Planning Board held its regular monthly meeting on January 17, 2013. Several officers were elected, including Joseph Falkoski as Chair, Steve Rattner as Vice-Chair, and Isobel Olcott as Secretary. Committee reports were provided on topics such as wastewater management, development reviews, and recent legislation. The Board also discussed the Flood Mitigation Program, correspondence received, and reports from other meetings. Resolutions were passed regarding the 2013 meeting schedule and authorizing destruction of past meeting recordings. The Capital Improvement Program for 2013-2018 was also discussed.
The Fort Point Channel Landmark District Commission will hold a public hearing on January 13, 2011 at 5:00 PM at Boston City Hall to review applications for design approval of proposed changes to properties in the Fort Point Channel Landmark District. Applications include installing signage at 319 A Street and 337 Summer Street, and substantial renovations and restoration work with changes to buildings at 7-9 Channel Center and 5 Channel Center intended for residential and commercial uses. Public comment will be taken on these applications and other business before the Commission.
The Morris County Planning Board held its regular monthly meeting on September 20, 2012. Key discussions and actions included:
- Accepting the Director's report and reports of funds received for July and August 2012.
- Discussing the Wastewater Management Plan and watershed activities.
- Reviewing several development applications and approving reports of actions taken.
- Discussing recent legislation, master plan amendments, and zoning changes.
- Receiving liaison reports on various commissions and councils.
- Beginning work to map investment areas as defined in the new State Strategic Plan.
This letter from the Community Development Director of Emeryville, California informs Onni Group that their application for the "Onni Christie Ave." project is being deemed withdrawn. The letter cites two reasons for this: 1) Onni is no longer under contract to purchase the project site and no longer has consent from the property owner to pursue entitlements, and 2) Onni has outstanding invoices totaling $55,670.91 for services related to the application that are past due. Onni has 15 days to appeal the decision and 10 days to pay the outstanding balance. Attachments provide background on the original application, a letter from the property owner rescinding consent, and an invoice for costs.
EQT Notice of Appeal Contesting DEP Order Finding Greene County Spill Led to ...Marcellus Drilling News
The appeal from EQT in response to a finding/order by the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) in which the DEP alleges a 2010 spill at an EQT drilling site in Greene County, PA led to permanent pollution of a nearby fresh water spring.
Northampton Landfill Waiver from DEP 06-23-2006Adam Cohen
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection approved a waiver request from regulatory siting criteria for a proposed expansion of the Northampton Landfill. The expansion areas are located within the Zone II of a public drinking water well and a Potentially Productive Aquifer. The Department determined that strict compliance with the criteria would result in undue hardship and not minimize adverse impacts. The waiver was necessary to accommodate the regional need for additional landfill capacity and would not diminish protection of public health, safety, or the environment.
The Community Development Department of Grandview, Missouri provided comments on a minor subdivision request submitted by Dennis Randolph, Director of Public Works. City staff reviewed the drawings and identified several issues including: 1) An existing storage shed is in violation and needs to be relocated or removed. 2) The legal description of Tract I contains an error. 3) The scale, north arrow, and date are missing from the drawings. Revisions are required to address these comments and resubmit the proper documents before the subdivision can be approved.
This document summarizes a public information meeting about proposed road paving and restriping projects in the Sully District of Fairfax County. It discusses VDOT's paving program overview and conditions, proposed modifications to add bike lanes to Northbourne Drive and Pleasant Valley Road, and seeks community feedback on priority crossing locations. Residents are encouraged to provide comments by February 12th on the striping change designs, which will be finalized in April, with paving work occurring between April and November.
This is my final project in Intro to GIS. I am playing the role of an Anlayst for FPL. The presentation covers concerns of the public in regards to the Bobwhite Manatee Transmission Line near Tampa.
Dokumen tersebut membahas rekomendasi desain dan lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) sanitary landfill di Kabupaten Kota. Beberapa pertimbangan yang dijelaskan mencakup aksesibilitas, curah hujan, geologi, hidrologi, serta persepsi sosial ekonomi masyarakat setempat. Dilakukan pula analisis kelayakan lokasi berdasarkan aspek teknis, lingkungan, dan sosial untuk memastikan kesesuaian lokasi.
Leachate management of Constructed wetlands_Yuka Ogata_National Institute for...CRL Asia
The document summarizes a lecture on using constructed wetlands for landfill leachate management. It describes what landfill leachate is, current methods for leachate management including collection and treatment, and introduces constructed wetlands as a natural treatment method. It then outlines a research study at a landfill site in Thailand evaluating the use of a pilot-scale constructed wetland for leachate treatment. The wetland showed good plant growth, 53% water reduction through evapotranspiration, and 51-69% removal of total solids, total carbon, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen.
Environmental Impact Assessment of Sentosa Integrated ResortNovember Tan
An assignment for a class on Environmental Management and Assessment, we are asked to conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment on the reclamation on Sentosa island for the construction of a integrated resort.
It is important to note that this is in many ways a hypothetical EIA. There were assumptions made and we did NOT do any baseline surveys or studies. Information were all taken from other sources and projected for this site.
Landfill leachate varies widely in composition, it usually contains both dissolved and suspended material. The generation of leachate is caused principally by precipitation percolating through waste deposited in a landfill. As leachate first emerges, it can be black in colour, anoxic, and possibly effervescent, with dissolved and entrained gases.
How to Make a Photo Collage with PowerPointJohanna Riddle
The document provides instructions for creating a photo collage in PowerPoint. It guides the reader to insert images onto a blank slide, resize and rearrange the photos, select a background image, remove backgrounds from photos, add word art, and save the completed collage. The instructions are broken into steps with screenshots to demonstrate how to move, size, layer, and style the images. The overall collage is tied together with an overlay photo and words are added before saving the final product.
This document discusses methods for treating landfill leachate. Leachate is produced as water percolates through waste in a landfill. It contains high levels of organic and inorganic contaminants. The main goals of leachate treatment are to reduce environmental impacts and meet regulatory discharge standards. Common treatment methods include biological processes like aerobic and anaerobic treatment, as well as physical/chemical processes such as coagulation, flocculation, adsorption, and membrane filtration. Often, a combination of treatment methods is needed to sufficiently reduce contaminants in leachate before discharge or reuse.
Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit- Unit IIIGAURAV. H .TANDON
This document provides an overview of environmental impact assessments and environmental audits. It defines environmental impact assessment as the systematic identification and evaluation of potential impacts of proposed projects on the natural environment. The key steps of an EIA include organizing an interdisciplinary team, performing an assessment of the site and potential impacts, writing an environmental impact statement, and reviewing the EIS. Environmental audits evaluate an organization's environmental performance and position and identify ways to improve environmental management systems. The document outlines the basic components and steps in conducting environmental audits.
This document provides a Phase IV completion statement, remedy operation status opinion, and substantial hazard evaluation for the former Mobil Service Station located at 99 Worcester Road in Natick, Massachusetts. It details the implementation of enhanced bioremediation using BOS 200 injections to address soil and groundwater contamination. Groundwater monitoring results indicate that concentrations of contaminants of concern have decreased significantly since injection. The report concludes that no substantial hazards exist at the site and that monitored natural attenuation can now address any remaining contamination.
The Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden Agricultural Society & City of Northampton are requesting an amendment to the Final Order of Conditions for the redevelopment of the Three County Fairgrounds. The amendment seeks to clarify the scope of work for Phase 1 of the project which includes relocating show rings, adding a promenade, installing additional stormwater infrastructure, and expanding site utilities and gravel surfacing. While the overall master plan has not changed, the specific scope of Phase 1 has been modified after further consideration of feasibility and construction sequencing. The amendment requests the Conservation Commission approve these additions to Phase 1.
Governor Paterson's Recovery Cabinet will host workshops throughout New York to discuss the second round of broadband stimulus funding from the NTIA and RUS programs. The workshops will highlight changes to the NOFA and encourage partnerships and comprehensive solutions to improve broadband access. State and local agencies, non-profits, libraries, and broadband providers are invited to attend to apply for funding, which will be awarded on a rolling basis beginning in June 2010.
The document summarizes a public meeting to present and get feedback on an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed William J. Carroll Government Center project in Solano County. The meeting covered an overview of the project, an explanation of the environmental review process under CEQA, highlights from the IS/MND including the resource areas evaluated and potential impacts found to be less than significant with mitigation, next steps in the CEQA process, and an invitation for public comments on the IS/MND.
The Alachua County Environmental Protection Department (ACEPD) has reviewed Beazer East's Short Term Interim Measures Workplan for the Koppers Superfund site. ACEPD has several concerns about the proposed stormwater and dust control measures. Specifically, ACEPD is concerned that the proposed raking and discing operations could mix and dilute contaminated soils. ACEPD also notes that additional contaminants beyond arsenic, copper and chromium may be present in stormwater. ACEPD requests that its comments be addressed before approval of the stormwater permit application.
The report summarizes groundwater, surface water, and leachate monitoring data collected between April 2009 and March 2010 at the Hartland landfill and surrounding area. Key findings include: (1) Groundwater flow patterns were consistent with previous years, with some northward and southeastward flow captured by purge wells. (2) Groundwater quality showed contained leachate impacts. (3) Elevated parameters near the Hartland North Pad indicated ongoing impacts from historical composting and current aggregate stockpiling. Water quality is closely monitored.
The Morris County Planning Board held its regular monthly meeting on January 17, 2013. Several officers were elected, including Joseph Falkoski as Chair, Steve Rattner as Vice-Chair, and Isobel Olcott as Secretary. Committee reports were provided on topics such as wastewater management, development reviews, and recent legislation. The Board also discussed the Flood Mitigation Program, correspondence received, and reports from other meetings. Resolutions were passed regarding the 2013 meeting schedule and authorizing destruction of past meeting recordings. The Capital Improvement Program for 2013-2018 was also discussed.
The Fort Point Channel Landmark District Commission will hold a public hearing on January 13, 2011 at 5:00 PM at Boston City Hall to review applications for design approval of proposed changes to properties in the Fort Point Channel Landmark District. Applications include installing signage at 319 A Street and 337 Summer Street, and substantial renovations and restoration work with changes to buildings at 7-9 Channel Center and 5 Channel Center intended for residential and commercial uses. Public comment will be taken on these applications and other business before the Commission.
The Morris County Planning Board held its regular monthly meeting on September 20, 2012. Key discussions and actions included:
- Accepting the Director's report and reports of funds received for July and August 2012.
- Discussing the Wastewater Management Plan and watershed activities.
- Reviewing several development applications and approving reports of actions taken.
- Discussing recent legislation, master plan amendments, and zoning changes.
- Receiving liaison reports on various commissions and councils.
- Beginning work to map investment areas as defined in the new State Strategic Plan.
This letter from the Community Development Director of Emeryville, California informs Onni Group that their application for the "Onni Christie Ave." project is being deemed withdrawn. The letter cites two reasons for this: 1) Onni is no longer under contract to purchase the project site and no longer has consent from the property owner to pursue entitlements, and 2) Onni has outstanding invoices totaling $55,670.91 for services related to the application that are past due. Onni has 15 days to appeal the decision and 10 days to pay the outstanding balance. Attachments provide background on the original application, a letter from the property owner rescinding consent, and an invoice for costs.
EQT Notice of Appeal Contesting DEP Order Finding Greene County Spill Led to ...Marcellus Drilling News
The appeal from EQT in response to a finding/order by the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) in which the DEP alleges a 2010 spill at an EQT drilling site in Greene County, PA led to permanent pollution of a nearby fresh water spring.
Northampton Landfill Waiver from DEP 06-23-2006Adam Cohen
The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection approved a waiver request from regulatory siting criteria for a proposed expansion of the Northampton Landfill. The expansion areas are located within the Zone II of a public drinking water well and a Potentially Productive Aquifer. The Department determined that strict compliance with the criteria would result in undue hardship and not minimize adverse impacts. The waiver was necessary to accommodate the regional need for additional landfill capacity and would not diminish protection of public health, safety, or the environment.
The Community Development Department of Grandview, Missouri provided comments on a minor subdivision request submitted by Dennis Randolph, Director of Public Works. City staff reviewed the drawings and identified several issues including: 1) An existing storage shed is in violation and needs to be relocated or removed. 2) The legal description of Tract I contains an error. 3) The scale, north arrow, and date are missing from the drawings. Revisions are required to address these comments and resubmit the proper documents before the subdivision can be approved.
This document summarizes a public information meeting about proposed road paving and restriping projects in the Sully District of Fairfax County. It discusses VDOT's paving program overview and conditions, proposed modifications to add bike lanes to Northbourne Drive and Pleasant Valley Road, and seeks community feedback on priority crossing locations. Residents are encouraged to provide comments by February 12th on the striping change designs, which will be finalized in April, with paving work occurring between April and November.
This is my final project in Intro to GIS. I am playing the role of an Anlayst for FPL. The presentation covers concerns of the public in regards to the Bobwhite Manatee Transmission Line near Tampa.
The document outlines the agenda for the February 9, 2016 monthly public meeting of Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) 5D. The agenda includes standing presentations from the Executive Office of the Mayor and Ward 5 Councilmember. There will also be requested presentations on development projects and DC legislation. The bulk of the meeting will involve action items like reviewing Board of Zoning Adjustment applications for variances and special exceptions to convert residential buildings into apartment houses. The agenda also allocates time for community concerns and administrative matters like adoption of meeting minutes.
The document summarizes a request to the EPA to cease dissemination of the Climate Action Report (CAR) due to violations of the Federal Data Quality Act (FDQA). Specifically, it argues that the CAR relies upon and disseminates findings from the National Assessment on Climate Change (NACC) which fails to meet FDQA requirements for objectivity, utility, and reproducibility. It details how the NACC inappropriately used computer models and data that are not scientifically valid, and that the US Global Change Research Program failed to complete all required analyses before releasing the NACC. As a result, the petitioner requests that EPA remove the CAR from its website and cease disseminating it to comply with FDQA guidelines.
The Study on Notification and Decision-Making Processes on the Hydropower in ...CPWF Mekong
By Ham Kimkong, DES/RUPP, M-POWER Fellow
Presented at the Mekong Forum on Water, Food and Energy
Phnom Penh, Cambodia
December 7-9, 2011
Session 8a: Presenting the work of the M-POWER Fellows
Social & Environmental Assessment New (1).docFiazGujjar1
The document provides details on the mitigation measures that will be adopted for the construction of a spur in Union Council Bait Baet Wala Mauza Bait Chin Dera Ghazi Khan. It identifies potential impacts from earthwork activities including reduction in fertility of disposal areas and deterioration of air quality from dust. The adopted mitigation measures include leveling and selecting disposal areas with minimal environmental hazards, using wet earth and sprinkling water to control dust, and ensuring excavation machinery is in good condition with low noise and smoke emissions. Progress will be monitored through quarterly reports addressing environmental and social issues.
This document provides a table listing regulatory contacts for solid waste management for each Canadian province and territory. For each jurisdiction it provides the relevant legislation, the contact information including name, phone number, fax, email and website for the responsible regulatory body. The table contains contact information for 13 Canadian provinces and territories.
Similar to Northampton Landfill 2006 Vol 1 Technical Report (20)
Owen Freeman-Daniels Campaign Brochure - July 2011 #1Adam Cohen
Owen Freeman-Daniels is running for City Councilor in Ward 3 of Northampton. He has over a decade of experience advocating for the community through various organizations. If elected, Owen will focus on supporting the arts, local businesses, and environment while ensuring affordable housing and responsible development. He will encourage open debates on issues and represent the diverse interests of the ward.
Owen Freeman-Daniels Campaign Brochure - July 2011 #2Adam Cohen
Owen Freeman-Daniels has a proven record of community involvement and leadership in Ward 3. When the community needed help with issues like house fires and forming a neighborhood watch, Owen stepped up to lead the efforts. He has also worked on numerous committees around education, the economy, zoning, and city planning. Multiple community members praise Owen for his dedication, ability to listen to all sides, and getting things done for the ward.
Arnie Levinson Campaign Brochure - May 2011Adam Cohen
Arnie Levinson is running for City Councilor in Ward 3 of Northampton, MA. He is a recently retired orthodontist who has lived in Ward 3 for 15 years. He lists his key issues as road and infrastructure repair, keeping Bridge Street School open, managing development and infill to limit impacts on neighborhoods, addressing concerns at the Fairgrounds redevelopment and Island Road, protecting the Meadows for agriculture, and advocating for public housing residents. He provides his contact information and invites people to volunteer or donate to his campaign.
The document summarizes the campaign of Arnie Levinson, who is running for City Council in Ward 3 of Northampton, MA. Levinson promises to advocate fully for the concerns of Ward 3 residents at City Hall and keep them informed through various channels of communication. Levinson criticizes his opponent's view that a councilor should remain neutral and not get involved in development projects, arguing that a councilor should publicly advocate for residents' interests. Levinson asks voters to elect him to bring balance to decision making at City Hall and ensure residents' voices are heard on important issues affecting the city.
Owen Freeman-Daniels Campaign Brochure May 2011Adam Cohen
Owen Freeman-Daniels is running for City Councilor of Ward 3 in Northampton, MA. He is a lifelong resident of Northampton who attended local schools and currently works in financial services for a local independent firm. He is involved in several community organizations in Ward 3 and the city, including the Ward 3 Neighborhood Association where he serves as Vice President. If elected, he aims to promote economic growth through small businesses and the arts, encourage sustainable land use practices, and build consensus among residents on challenging issues.
Arnie Levinson Campaign Brochure May 2011Adam Cohen
Arnie Levinson is running for City Councilor in Ward 3 of Northampton, MA. He has concerns about deteriorating road conditions impacting local businesses, keeping Bridge Street Elementary School open as an anchor for the downtown community, and ensuring new development through infill and at the Fairgrounds is managed responsibly. He will advocate for traffic calming, a resolution on Island Road that satisfies neighbors and the Marina, and improvements for residents of public housing. The document provides Arnie's contact information and invites readers to volunteer or donate to his campaign.
The document provides the election calendar for a special election to fill a vacancy for the councillor from Ward Three in Northampton, Massachusetts. It lists the important dates for the nomination process, voter registration deadlines, and dates for a preliminary election and the special election, if needed. The document also provides contact information for the Northampton Board of Registrars.
Lisa Fusco is running for City Councilor in Ward 3 of Northampton, Massachusetts. She has a background in environmental law enforcement and owns several local businesses. She is committed to sustainability, economic prosperity, and representing the views of Ward 3 residents on the City Council. She asks for voters' support on November 8th, 2011.
Transition Northampton Event 21 April 2011Adam Cohen
Transition Northampton Presents a movie and discussion event called "In Transition: From oil dependence to local resilience" on April 21st at the Florence Civic Center. The Transition movement aims to help communities creatively respond to peak oil and climate change by building a more local and resilient future. The event is sponsored by local civic and business associations and will provide information on the positive and solutions-focused Transition movement.
Gateways Beautification Committee Meeting 01 Minutes 05 April 2011Adam Cohen
The Gateways Beautification Committee met to discuss plans to improve entrance areas into Northampton. They made a preliminary list of 8 gateway locations and scheduled a site visit tour. The committee also discussed determining an overall design style, ensuring sustainability, addressing maintenance needs, and gaining community support for the project. Their next meeting will be in May to review the site visits.
Gateways Beautification Committee Meeting 01 Minutes 05 April 2011Adam Cohen
The Gateways Beautification Committee, a joint project of the city's ward and neighborhood-based groups, held its first meeting tonight, and it was a very productive session indeed. We're off to a flying start, and I'm sending along a brief summary of our discussions and decisions for your information. We have a very good core group and hope to expand it with folks who are interested in helping spruce up the gateway entrances to our city.
Here's the summary of our meeting.
Jerry Budgar
Contact Information for Our State LegislatorsAdam Cohen
The document provides information on supporting "An Act to Invest in Our Communities" through attending an upcoming hearing, calling state representatives and senators to ask for their support, getting organizations to support the Act through resolutions, and includes contact information for State Senator Stan Rosenberg and State Representative Peter Kocot.
Summary of Northampton Budget FY2012 as of 31 March 2011Adam Cohen
The document summarizes the general fund budget for fiscal year 2012. Total revenues are projected at $75.5 million, with the largest sources being taxes at $46.3 million and charges for services at $7 million. Total proposed expenditures are $77.1 million, with the largest allocations being education at $29.9 million, public safety at $11.7 million, and employee benefits at $14.9 million. The budget projects a deficit of $1.5 million.
Local taxes and charges for services saw the largest median annual increases from 2000-2011 at 5.3% each. State aid from the Cherry Sheet saw the largest median annual decrease at -9.5% per year. Interfund operating transfers saw the steepest declines with a median annual decrease of -18.6% over this period.
Northampton Budget FY2012 as of 31 March 2011Adam Cohen
This document summarizes the general fund budget for fiscal year 2012. Total revenues are projected to be $75,545,118, with the largest sources being taxes at $46 million and state revenue from the Cherry Sheet at $15 million. Total proposed expenditures are $77 million, with the largest allocations being $30 million for education, $15 million for employee benefits, and $11 million for public safety. The budget projects a $1.5 million deficit.
Memo Reprecincting Committee 29 March 2011Adam Cohen
The mayor of Northampton, MA appoints a committee to oversee redrawing the city's precinct and ward boundaries based on 2010 census data. The committee is chaired by David Stevens and includes one representative from each of the city's seven wards. They will work with the city clerk and GIS coordinator to complete a new precinct plan by May 13, 2011 for city council approval and state submission by the June 15 deadline. The new boundaries take effect on December 31, 2011.
Zoning Changes Proposal Detail 28 March 2011Adam Cohen
This document proposes revisions to Northampton's zoning regulations to facilitate higher density residential development while preserving neighborhood character. It found that the current regulations prevent adding units and lead to a loss of housing over time. Public feedback supported infill that adds units within existing structures or on owner-occupied properties. The proposal recommends allowing accessory units in garages and detached structures, revising dimensional standards, and incentivizing affordable housing.
The Solid Waste Reduction and Management Task Force discussed public forums held to gather input on waste management options for Northampton. Key discussion points included concerns about narrow streets being accessible to trash trucks, the need to set timetables and recycling goals, and where the city's trash will go once nearby landfills close. The Task Force also addressed questions raised at the forums on topics like how dumpsters for community projects would be funded after the landfill closes and whether waste could be restricted just to city residents. Members reviewed correspondence received and sought any additional information needed to make recommendations.
North Street Capital Project Request 18 January 2011Adam Cohen
The document is a capital project request form submitted by the Public Works Department for the reconstruction of North Street. It indicates the project would replace the existing roadway, curbing, sidewalks, and all municipal utilities including water, sewer and storm drains. It is considered a high priority that will correct safety hazards and improve efficiency by eliminating costly maintenance needs. The preliminary cost estimate for the project is $1,400,000 and it is proposed to be designed in house with construction taking place from summer 2012 to summer 2013.
Main Street King Street Charrette Final PresentationAdam Cohen
This document summarizes a charrette for improving safety on Northampton Main/King Street in Northampton, MA. It discusses how overbuilt wide streets encourage speeding, which poses dangers to pedestrians. It presents research showing that narrowing streets from four lanes to three lanes can reduce collisions by up to 60% by calming traffic. The document proposes several designs to narrow King Street from 80 feet to 62 feet wide through road diets and paint changes to prioritize pedestrian safety and walkability while still accommodating traffic needs.
Shark Tank Jargon | Operational ProfitabilityTheUnitedIndian
Don't let fancy business words confuse you! This blog is your cheat sheet to understanding the Shark Tank Jargon. We'll translate all the confusing terms like "valuation" (how much the company is worth) and "royalty" (a fee for using someone's idea). You'll be swimming with the Sharks like a pro in no time!
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
ग्रेटर मुंबई के नगर आयुक्त को एक खुले पत्र में याचिका दायर कर 540 से अधिक मुंबईकरों ने सभी अवैध और अस्थिर होर्डिंग्स, साइनबोर्ड और इलेक्ट्रिक साइनेज को तत्काल हटाने और 13 मई, 2024 की शाम को घाटकोपर में अवैध होर्डिंग के गिरने की विनाशकारी घटना के बाद अपराधियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग की है, जिसमें 17 लोगों की जान चली गई और कई निर्दोष लोग गंभीर रूप से घायल हो गए।
18062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...rittaajmal71
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Recent years have seen a disturbing rise in violence, discrimination, and intolerance against Christian communities in various Islamic countries. This multifaceted challenge, deeply rooted in historical, social, and political animosities, demands urgent attention. Despite the escalating persecution, substantial support from the Western world remains lacking.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
लालू यादव की जीवनी LALU PRASAD YADAV BIOGRAPHYVoterMood
Discover the life and times of Lalu Prasad Yadav with a comprehensive biography in Hindi. Learn about his early days, rise in politics, controversies, and contribution.
15062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
विवादास्पद फिल्म के ट्रेलर से गाली-गलौज वाले दृश्य हटा दिए गए हैं, और जुर्माना लगाया गया है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट और बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट दोनों ने फिल्म की रिलीज पर रोक लगा दी है और उसे निलंबित कर दिया है। पहले यह फिल्म 7 जून और फिर 14 जून को रिलीज होने वाली थी, लेकिन अब यह 21 जून को रिलीज हो रही है।
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdfEdouardHusson
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
Christian persecution in Islamic countries has intensified, with alarming incidents of violence, discrimination, and intolerance. This article highlights recent attacks in Nigeria, Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, exposing the multifaceted challenges faced by Christian communities. Despite the severity of these atrocities, the Western world's response remains muted due to political, economic, and social considerations. The urgent need for international intervention is underscored, emphasizing that without substantial support, the future of Christianity in these regions is at grave risk.
https://ecspe.org/the-rise-of-christian-persecution-in-islamic-countries/
On the Wrong Track | Recent Increasing Train Accidents in India | News
Northampton Landfill 2006 Vol 1 Technical Report
1. NORTHAMPTON
SANITARY LANDFILL
PHASE5B
BWPSWOl
SITE SUITABILITY REPORT
Volume 1: Technical Report
Prepared for:
Department of Public Works
City of Northampton
Massachusetts
Presented to:
Department of Environmental Protection
Division of Solid Waste Management
436 Dwight Street
Springfield, MA 01103
Prepared by:
Dufresne-Henry
March • 2006
Dufresne· Henry
136 West Street, Suite 203, Northampton, MA 01060
Tel: (413) 584-4776 Fax: (413) 584-3157
2. March 13, 2006
Mr. Daniel Hall, Section Chief
Division of Solid Waste Management
Department of Environmental Protection
436 Dwight Street
Springfield, MA 01103
RE: Northampton Sanitary Landfill- Phase SB Expansion
BWPSWOl- Site Suitability Report, Transmittal No. W074719
DH #9206004
Dear Mr. Hall:
On behalf of the City of Northampton (City), Dufresne-Henry (DH) is pleased to submit for your
review a Site Suitability Report application (BWPSWO 1) for the Phase 5B expansion of the
Northampton Sanitary Landfill, which is located off Glendale Road.
Background
The Phase 5 and Phase 5B expansion are proposed on the 51.5-acre parcel of land adjacent to
and north of the active landfill operation. This property was purchased by the City in 1988 for
the purposes of expanding the landfill. The City's current regional landfill operation is on the
adjacent parcel to the south and has an estimated operational life until about the end of2007.
The City submitted a Site Suitability Report for the Phase 5 Expansion for a portion of this
property in 2000 and received a determination of Administrative Completion on November 17,
2000 (Report Number: 214-002-B). Based on more recent and accurate data (aerial topography
and approved resource area delineation by the Northampton Conservation Commission), the
landfill design limit has changed, resulting in an additional4.6-acre area also requiring site
assignment. The previous Site Suitability Report from 2000, which describes a site assignment
area for a 16.4-acres landfill, is "grandfathered" under the former site assignment regulations
regarding the 500-foot setback from residential dwellings. Per earlier conversations with you,
you stated that this additional4.6-acre area is subject to the current regulated 1000-foot setback
from residential dwellings. We also understand that the additional4.6-acre area must go through
a separate site assignment process rather than a major modification of the original site suitability
report application from 2000.
The development of a new solid waste disposal capacity requires the filing of an Environmental
Notification Form (ENF) in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act
K:9206004 (Northampton LF Phase 5 Waiver)EngineeringEnvironmentalPennitsSite DevelopmentPhase 5b Site Suitability 2006Cover
Letter.doc
• 136 West Street, Suite 203, Northampton, MA 01060-3711 • T: 413.584.4776 • F: 413.584.3157 •
• E: northampton@dufresne-henry.com • W: dufresne-henry.com •
3. Mr. Daniel Hall
March 13, 2006
Page2 of3
(MEPA). An ENF for this project was submitted to the MEPA office on October 27,2000 and a
certificate requiring an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was issued on December 8, 2000.
The DEIR was submitted to the Secretary of Environmental Affairs in September of 2005 for the
Phase 5 and Phase 5B landfill expansion. MEP A issued a certificate dated October 31, 2005
requiring the preparation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). The FEIR was
submitted to MEP A in December of 2005 and the Secretary of Environmental Affairs issued the
FEIR certificate on January 27, 2006. The FEIR certificate stated that the project adequately and
properly complies with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act and its implementing
regulations. Both the DEIR and FEIR contain a thorough analysis and description of facility
specific criteria and environmental impacts. Therefore, much information in this application
consists of relevant excerpted sections of the DEIR and FEIR.
Phase 5 and Phase 5B will require a waiver from the site assignment criteria that precludes the
development of a landfill in a Zone II to a public water supply well. The specific data and
analyses for this waiver are located in Section 4 of this document. The waiver request contains
the results of a contaminant transport model that analyzes potential impacts to the Easthampton
Maloney Well if a future release from the landfill expansion were to occur. The contaminant
transport model was also included in the Draft EIR in order to receive wider public review of the
key part of the pending waiver request. It is requested that the DEP review this waiver
information and issue findings as it relates to this site assignment application (Phase 5B) and the
previous site assignment application for Phase 5 (Report Number: 214-002-B).
If positive site suitability reports are issued for the Phase 5 and Phase 5B applications, the City
plans on coordinating the public comment period and public hearing for the site assignment so
that they are completed concurrently.
This application has been distributed in accordance with the requirements of the regulations (31 0
CMR 16.000)
Please contact me if there are any questions regarding this application.
Sincerely,
DUFRESNE-HENRY, INC.
James R. Laurila, P.E.
Associate
JRL/nls,mlc
Enclosures
K:9206004 (Northampton LF Phase 5 Waiver)EngineeringEnvironmentalPennitsSite DevelopmentPhase 5b Site Suitability 2006Cover
Letter. doc
4. Mr. Daniel Hall
March 13, 2006
Page 3 of3
c: George Andrikidis, P.E., Director, Department of Public Works
MA DEP Boston, Bureau of Waste Prevention
Northampton Board of Health (2)
Easthampton Board of Health
Forbes Library
Easthampton Public Library
Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Environmental Health Services
Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
Ned Huntley, City Engineer, Department of Public Works
Charles Clines, Department of Environmental Protection, WERO
K:9206004 (Northampton LF Phase 5 Waiver)EngineeringEnvironmentalPermitsSite DevelopmentPhase 5b Site Suitability 2006Cover
Letter. doc
5. Enter your transmittal number W074719
Transmittal Number
Your unique Transmittal Number can be accessed online: http://www.mass.gov/dep/counter/trasmfrm.shtml or call
DEP's lnfoline at 617-338-2255 or 800-462-0444 (from 508, 781, and 978 area codes).
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Transmittal Form for Permit Application and Payment
1. Please type or
print. A separate
A. Permit Information
Transmittal Form BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for New Site Assignment
must be completed 1. Permit Code: 7 or 8 character code from permit instructions 2. Name of Permit Category
for each permit
application.
Sanitary Landfill Expansion
3. Type of Project or Activity
2. Make your
check payable to B. Applicant Information- Firm or Individual
the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts City of Northampton, Department of Public Works
and mail it with a 1. Name of Firm- Or, if party needing this approval is an individual enter name below:
copy of this form to:
DEP, P.O. Box
4062, Boston, MA 2. Last Name of Individual 3. First Name of Individual 4. Ml
02211. 125 Locust Street
5. Street Address
3. Three copies of Northampton MA 01060 413-587-1570
this form will be
6. City/Town 7. State 8. Zip Code 9. Telephone# 10. Ext.#
needed.
George Andrikidis, Director of Public Works
Copy 1 -the 11. Contact Person 12. e-mail address {optional)
original must
accompany your
permit application. C. Facility, Site or Individual Requiring Approval
Copy2 must
accompany your Northampton Sanitary Landfill
fee payment. 1. Name of Facility, Site Or Individual
Copy 3 should be Glendale Road
retained for your 2. Street Address
records
Northampton MA 01060 413-587-1570
4. Both fee-paying 3. City/Town 4. State 5. Zip Code
6. Telephone# 7. Ext.
and exempt
applicants must 8. DEP Facility Number {if Known) 9. Federaii.D. Number {if Known) 10. BWSC Tracking# {if Known)
mail a copy of this
transmittal form to: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0. Application Prepared by {if different from Section B)*
DEP
P.O. Box 4062 Dufresne-Henry
Boston, MA 1. Name of Firm Or Individual
02211 136 West Street, Suite 203
2. Address
*Note:
Northampton MA 01060 413-584-4 776 104
3. City/Town 4. State 5. Zip Code 6. Telephone# 7. Ext.#
For BWSC Permits,
enter the LSP. James R. Laurila
8. Contact Person 9. Number {BWSC Permits only)
E. Permit - Project Coordination
1. Is this project subject to MEPA review? 0 yes D no
If yes, enter the project's EOEA file number- assigned when an
Environmental Notification Form is submitted to the MEPA unit: 12351
EOEA File Number
F. Amount Due
DEPUse Only Special Provisions:
1. ~ Fee Exempt {city, town or municipal housing authority){state agency if fee is $100 or less).
Permit No: There are no fee exemptions for BWSC permits, regardless of applicant status.
2. D Hardship Request- payment extensions according to 310 CMR 4.04{3){c).
Rec'd Date: 3. D Alternative Schedule Project {according to 310 CMR 4.05 and 4.10).
4. D Homeowner {according to 310 CMR 4.02).
Reviewer:
Check Number Dollar Amount Date
tr-formw.doc • rev. 11/04 Page 1 of 1
6. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
Instructions
Important:
When filling out BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for New Site Assignment:
forms on the
computer, use
only the tab key The information requested on this application form must be supplied when filing an Application for a new
to move your Site Assignment pursuant to the provisions of the Site Assignment Regulations for Solid Waste
cursor- do not Management Facilities, 310 CMR 16.00.
use the retum
key.
The form is divided into six parts that are to be completed as follows:
~ I. General Information: All Applicants complete Part I.
~ II. Facility Specific Criteria: Part II is divided into three sections,
IIA For landfills,
II.B. For combustion facilities, and
II.C. For waste handling and processing facilities.
Applicants should complete only the appropriate section.
Ill. General Criteria: All Applicants complete Part Ill.
IV. Integrated Solid Waste Management: Complete Part IV only if the proposed facility is a landfill or
combustion facility.
V. Waiver: Complete Part V only if a waiver is requested.
VI. Signatures and Certification: All Applicants must sign the application in Part VI.
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability Report for a Major Modification of a Site Assignment:
The information requested on this application form must be supplied when filing an Application for a major
modification of an existing Site Assignment pursuant to the provisions of the Site Assignment Regulations
for Solid Waste Management Facilities at 31 0 CMR 16. 22{2).
When applying for a Major Modification, the applicant need only complete those sections of the form that
concern criteria affected by the major modification as determined in writing by the Department. The
applicant shall obtain this written determination from the Solid Waste Section in the DEP Regional Office
prior to completing and submitting this application.
General Information:
The Applicant should refer to the regulations themselves when completing the Application form. The
Application form provides a format for presenting the information required to determine whether the site
meets the criteria set forth in the Site Assignment Regulations themselves. The Application form is not a
substitute for the regulations, and the Applicant is responsible for providing all the information relevant to
evaluating the suitability of the site in accordance with 310 CMR 16.00.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01,38 ·Page 1 of42
7. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
Instructions (cont.)
The application form is annotated with section numbers, enclosed in {braces}, that reference sections in
the regulations. These references are included to make it easier to consult the regulations for guidance
in completing the application. The references are abbreviated in that, for example, 310 CMR 16.05(2) is
written as {16.05(2)}.
Completing the Application Form:
This application form contains three types of questions or requests for information:
1) Requests that documents be attached (e.g., maps). Please attach these documents and note on the
application form where these documents can be found.
2) Questions that require a written response. Questions that require a very brief response may be
answered in the space provided on the form itself. Longer responses should be attached to the form
and the location of the attachment identified in the space provided.
3) Questions that require a "yes" or "no" response. Put an "X" in the appropriate box and indicate in the
space provided where additional information or information supporting the response can be found.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 '
BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 2 of 42
8. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
Section I. General Information
Instructions: All Applicants should complete Part I.
A. Site Location and Project Description
Please provide the information requested.
1. Project name:
Northampton Sanitary Landfill Phase 58 Expansion
Name of Project
2. Site address:
Glendale Road
Street
Northampton MA 01060
City!Town State Zip Code
3. Type of facility:
12$1 landfill
D combustion
D waste handling and processing
4. Total area of the site, including all buffer zones:
51.5
acres
5. Total area to be site assigned for solid waste activities:
4.1 (landfill area) - Phase 58
acres
6. Capacity and expected life of proposed facility:
a. State the maximum daily capacity of the proposed facility in tons per day. (This number should
represent the maximum amount of waste to be accepted on any single day.):
325 tpd, 50,000 tpy
tons per day
b. State the average daily capacity of the proposed facility and describe how the average was
computed:
200 tpd
average daily capacity (tons per day)
Annual tons divided by number of operating days in a year, rounded up to next 10
how average was computed
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 3 of 42
9. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention - Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Site Location and Project Description (cont.)
c. State the yearly capacity of the proposed facility and, if the capacity is expected to change over
the life of the facility, indicate the capacity in each year the proposed facility is expected to
operate:
50,000 tons per year
yearly capacity
Expected change in capacity (if applicable):
Expected yearly capacity Year
d. State the number of years the facility is expected to operate:
21
years
e. State the total lifetime capacity of the proposed facility:
Phase 5 and 58: 2,237,000 cubic yards
capacity based on conceptual plans
7. Type of Waste: What type of waste will be accepted at the proposed facility? (check all that apply)
[g] municipal solid waste
[g] construction and demolition waste
0 industrial waste
[g] other, please specify: wastewater treatment plant grit & screenings
8. Project Description: describe the proposed project:
Expansion of existing landfill to adjacent parcel owned by the City of Northampton.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 4 of 42
10. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Applicant Identification
1. Identify the owner of the site:
City of Northampton, Department of Public Works
Name
125 Locust Street
Street Address
Northampton MA 01060
City!Town State Zip Code
413-587-1570
Telephone
George Andrikidis, Director of Public Works 413-587-1570
Contact Person Contact Telephone
2. Identify the operator of the proposed facility if the owner has entered into an agreement with an
operator:
N/A
Name
Street Address
City!Town State Zip Code
Telephone
Contact Person Contact Telephone
C. Fees {16.08(4)}
1. Proof of Payment: Documentation must be submitted showing that the requirements for paying the
Technical Fee to the Board of Health as per 16.08(4) have been satisfied.
Proof of payment may be either (please check which one you have provided):
[8J Document from the Board of Health stating that the Board of Health has waived the technical fee
or that the Applicant has satisfied the Technical Fee payment requirements; or
D Receipt showing that the Applicant has paid the Maximum Technical Fee to the municipality.
Location of Attachment:
Appendix A
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 5 of 42
11. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Fees {16.08(4)} (cont.)
2. Amount of Maximum Technical Fee: Enter the Maximum Technical Fee as computed using Appendix
A of 310 CMR 16.99:
N/A
Maximum Technical Fee
D. Collection Center for Household Hazardous Waste
Does the applicant intend to apply, pursuant to 310 CMR 30.190, for approval to operate a collection
center for hazardous waste from households on the proposed site?
DYes [8] No
If "yes," the Applicant should contact the Permitting Section of the Bureau of Waste Prevention in the
appropriate DEP Regional Office.
E. Declaration of Waiver Request {16.08(5)(c)}
1. Is a waiver from any of the site suitability criteria being requested under provisions of 310 CMR
16.40(6)? (If "yes," complete Part VA of this application form.)
[8] Yes D No
2. Is a waiver from any of the requirements of Part I of 310 CMR 16.00 being requested under
provisions of 310 CMR 16.18? (If "yes," complete Part V.B. of this application form.)
D Yes [8] No
F. Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) {16.08(5)(d)}
Indicate which one of the following is attached to the application:
D Evidence that the project does not require MEPA review.
D Certificate from the Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs stating that an
Environmental Impact Report is not required.
D Evidence that the MEPA process does apply and the Secretary has determined that an EIR is
required. (Note: The DEP will not complete its technical review of the application until the
applicant submits the Certificate from the Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental
Affairs stating that the Final Environmental Impact Report is acceptable.)
[8] Certificate from the Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs stating that the
Final Environmental Impact Report is acceptable.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 6 of 42
12. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# {if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
F. Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) {16.08(5)(d)} (cont.)
Location of Attachment:
Section 1, Page 1-1 and
Appendix A MEPA Certificate for Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)
section and/or page numbers
G. Wetlands Resources
1. Buffer Zone: Is any part of the proposed site located within 100 feet of any wetlands?
[8'] Yes D No
2. Riverfront Area: Is any part of the site located within a riverfront area?
[8'] Yes D No
3. Floodplain: Is any part of the proposed site located within a 100-year floodplain?
[8'] Yes D No
If the answer to question I.G.1, I.G.2 or I.G.3 is "yes," please describe what activities, if any, will occur
within the 100-foot buffer zone, the riverfront area or the 100-year floodplain.
Respond here or identify location of attached response:
No landfilling activities will occur within the 100-foot buffer zone of state jurisdictional wetlands, the
riverfront area or the 100-year floodplain. However, the project proposes to fill 0.9 acres of isolated
vegetated wetland that is under the local jurisdiction of the Northampton Conservation Commission.
section and/or page numbers
4. Order of Conditions: Will an Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection Act (c.131, s.40) be
required?
[8'] Yes D No
5. Variance: Will a variance from the Wetlands regulations be required?
DYes [8'] No
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01 , 38 • Page 7 of 42
13. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
H. Maps
1. Ground Water Contour Map: Has a ground water contour map for the site been developed?
DYes ~ No
If Yes, please attach the map and identify the location of the attachment:
section and/or page numbers
Please submit the following with the Application:
2. Locus Map: A US Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map of at least 8.5 x 11 inches in size (7.5
minute series scale) should be attached which clearly delineates the proposed site boundaries and
shows all access roads to the proposed site.
Identify the attachment:
Appendix F Figures
section and/or page numbers
3. Water Resources Site Plan: The following information regarding water resources should be indicated
on a site plan (scale no larger than one inch equals two hundred feet) that covers the site plus a one-
half mile extension in all directions from the site boundary. Please refer to the definitions at 31 0 CMR
16.02 for guidance on the meaning of the terms.
• All wetlands, associated buffer zones and riverfront areas as defined in 310 CMR 10.00
• All 100-year flood plains
• All surface water bodies (rivers, streams, ponds, lakes, reservoirs etc),
• All perennial streams draining to surface drinking water supplies,
• All private water supply wells
• All public water supply wells
• All or any fractions of Interim Wellhead Protection Areas (IWPA) or Zone II areas
• All or any fractions of Proposed Drinking Water Source Areas
• All or any fraction of a Zone A or B of a surface water supply
Identify the location of the attachment:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Priority Resources Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01 , 38 • Page 8 of 42
14. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
H. Maps (cont.)
4. Land Use Site Plan: The following information regarding land use should be indicated on a site plan
(scale no larger than one inch equals two hundred feet) that covers the site plus a one-half mile
extension in all directions from the site boundary:
• All wildlife management areas,
• All Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) as established by the Secretary of the
Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA),
• All lands actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural uses and lands classified as Prime,
Unique, or of State and Local Importance by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service;
• All of the Following Open Space Protected Areas:
• state forests
• state or municipal parklands or conservation land, or other open space held for natural
resource purposes in accordance with Article 97 of the Massachusetts Constitution
• MDC reservations
• lands with conservation. preservation, agricultural, or watershed protection restrictions
approved by the Secretary of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs
• conservation land owned by private non-profit land conservation organizations that is open
to the public
• All residential dwellings on site and within 500 feet (1000 feet for landfills) of the property
boundary,
• All occupied commercial buildings within 500 feet of the property boundary,
• All of the following:
• health care facilities
• prisons
• Elementary Schools
• middle schools
• high schools
• children's' pre-schools
• licensed day care centers
• senior centers
• youth centers
• Other Solid Waste Facilities
• All proposed waste handling areas on the site,
• All proposed areas of waste deposition on the site,
• All buildings and other facilities proposed on the site,
• All access roads on the site and traffic flow off the site,
• All abutting properties and their appropriate zoning designation (include any zoning abbreviations
in plan legend).
• The zoning designation of the proposed site.
Identify the location of the attachment:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 9 of 42
15. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
Section II. Facility Specific Criteria
Part II is divided into three sections. Complete only the appropriate section.
II.A. Landfills
II.B. Combustion Facilities
II.C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)}
Complete Part II .A., if Site Assignment is sought for a landfill.
1. Zone II of Existing Public Water Supply {16.40(3)(a)1.}: Will any area of waste deposition be located
within the designated Zone II area of an existing public water supply well?
~Yes D No
Location of supporting information or comments:
Section 2.1, Page 2-1 and Appendix B Priority Resources Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
2. IWPA of Existing Public Water Supply {16.40(3)(a)2.}: If the Zone II of an existing public water supply
well has not been determined, will any area of waste deposition be within the Interim Wellhead
Protection Area (IWPA) as defined at 310 CMR 22.02?
DYes ~ No
If "Yes" see the note at Question II.A.4. and identify where additional information is attached:
section and/or page
3. Zone II or IWPA of a Proposed Drinking Water Source Area {16.40(3)(a)3.}: Will any area of waste
deposition be within the area of a Zone II or Interim Well Head Protection Area (IWPA) of a proposed
drinking water source area for which the documentation necessary to obtain a source approval has
been submitted prior to the earlier of either the site assignment application, or if the MEPA process
does apply, the Secretary's Certificate on the Environmental Notification Form or Notice of Project
Change, or where applicable, the Secretary's Certificate on the EIR or Final EIR;
DYes ~ No
If "Yes" see the note at Question II.A.4. and identify where additional information is attached:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 ·Page 10 of 42
16. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)} (cont.)
4. 15,000 Feet Upgradient of Existing Public Water Source Well or Proposed Drinking Water Source
Area {16.40(3)(a)4.}: In instances where the Zone II has not been calculated, will any area of waste
deposition be 15,000 feet or less hydraulically upgradient of an existing public water source well or
proposed drinking water source area?
DYes f2J No
See the note and identify where additional information is attached:
section and/or page numbers
Note: If the answer to Questions II.A.2., 3, or 4 is "YES," the applicant may conduct and submit with
this application a preliminary Zone II study, approved of by the Department, showing that the waste
deposition area would be beyond the Zone II of the public water supply well or proposed drinking
water source area in question. Alternatively, the applicant may prepare and submit, with this
application, other evidence showing the well or proposed drinking water source area and the ground
water under the proposed site are not hydraulically connected
The Applicant should consult with the DEP Drinking Water Program in the Bureau of Resource
Protection prior to conducting a preliminary Zone II investigation to determine the scope of the
investigation. At a minimum, the preliminary Zone II submittal should consist of:
1) A review and discussion of all available pertinent geologic and hydrologic data including bedrock
and surficial geologic maps, hydrologic data reports and atlases, consultant reports, and pumping
test reports;
2) An estimate and orientation of the regional hydraulic gradient across the well site;
3) A preliminary conceptual model of the aquifer, including a discussion of pertinent recharge and till
boundaries; and
4) A preliminary estimate of the Zone II area as defined in the Drinking Water Program's Water
Supply Guidelines.
5. Danger to existing or proposed drinking water source area {16.40(3)(a)5.}: State why a discharge
from the facility would not pose a danger to any existing or proposed drinking water source area.
Respond here or identify where the response is attached:
Appendix L include the results of a contaminant transport model that illustrates that the proposed
landfill expansion does not present a risk to the future water quality at the Maloney Well in
Easthampton.
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 11 of 42
17. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)} (cont.)
6. Sole Source Aquifer {16.40(3)(a)6.}: Will any area of waste deposition be located within the recharge
area of a designated sole source aquifer? (Sole Source Aquifers are designated by the US
Environmental Protection Agency. To inquire as to whether a site is located above a Sole Source
Aquifer contact the US Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, Ground Water Management
Section.)
0 Yes lSI No
Identify location of attached information:
Appendix B Priority Resources Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to question II.A.6. is "yes," then the site is not suitable unless the criteria in 310 CMR
16.40(3)(a)6.a., b. and c. are met. Attach documentation showing that these criteria are satisfied.
Identify location of attached information:
section and/or page numbers
7. Zone of Contribution or Recharge Area {16.40(3)(a)7.}: Is any area of waste deposition within the
zone of contribution of an existing public water supply or proposed drinking water source area, or the
recharge area of a surface drinking water supply, pursuant to a municipal ordinance or by-law
enacted in accordance with M.G.L. c. 40A, § 9?
lSI Yes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 2.1, Page 2-1 and Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan
section and/or page numbers
8. Zone A orB of Surface Drinking Water Supply {16.40(3)(a)8.}: Will any area of waste deposition be
within the Zone A or Zone B of a surface water supply?
0 Yes lSI No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01,38 • Page 12 of42
18. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)} (cont.)
9. Perennial stream draining to Surface Drinking Water Supply {16.40(3)(a)9.} Will any area of waste
deposition be located within 400 feet upgradient, as defined by groundwater flow or surface water
drainage, of a perennial water course that drains to a surface water supply that itself is within one
mile of the waste deposition area?
DYes ~ No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix F Site Locus and Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan
section and/or page numbers
10. Potentially Productive Aquifer {16.40(3)(a)10.}: Will any area of waste deposition be within a
Potentially Productive Aquifer?
DYes ~ No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to question II.A.1 0. is "yes," then the site is not suitable unless documentation is
attached showing that either 16.40(3}(a)10.a., b. or c. applies.
Identify location of attached documentation:
section and/or page numbers
11. Within 1000 feet Upgradient or Otherwise within 500 Feet of an Existing or Potential Private Water
Supply Well {16.40(3)(a)11.}: Will any area of waste deposition be within 1000 feet upgradient, and
where not upgradient, within 500 feet, of a private water supply well existing or established as a
potential supply at the time of submittal of the application?
DYes ~ No
Identify location of supporting information or comments
Appendix B Water Resources, Land Use Site Plan and Conceptual Grading Plan with Aerial Underlay
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01,38 ·Page 13 of42
19. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)} (cont.)
If the answer to question II.A.11 is "yes," attach documentation showing a valid option to purchase
each such supply. Also indicate whether a replacement drinking water supply will be provided.
Identify the location of attached documentation:
page numbers
12. Four Feet Depth to Ground Water {16.40(3)(a)12.}: Will the maximum high ground water level under
any area of waste deposition be less than four (4) feet below the lowermost level of the waste or, if a
liner system is employed, four feet below the bottom of the lower most liner?
DYes [3J No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 2.3, Page 2-2
section and/or page numbers
13. Wetlands 16.40(3)(a)13.}: Will any area of waste deposition or any leachate containment structure be
within any resource area, including the 100 year floodplain, protected by the Wetlands Protection
Act?
DYes [3J No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 2.4, Page 2-2
section and/or page numbers
14. 400 Feet to a Lake or 200 feet to a Riverfront Area {16.40(3)(a)14.}: Will any area of waste deposition
or any leachate containment structure be within 400 feet of a lake or within 200 feet of a Riverfront
Area as defined in 310 CMR 10.00, that is not a drinking water supply?
DYes [3J No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Conceptual Grading Plan
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 14 of 42
20. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Landfills {16.40(3)(a)} (cont.)
15. 1000 Feet to Various Occupied Facilities {16.40(3)(a)15.}: Will any area of waste deposition be within
1000 feet of any of the following (excluding equipment storage or maintenance structures):
• an occupied residential dwelling,
• health care facility
• prison,
• Elementary School
• middle school
• high school
• children's' pre-school
• licensed day care center
• senior center
• youth center
D Yes r8] No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Conceptual Grading Plan and Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to II.A.15. is "yes", attach documentation showing evidence of a valid option to
purchase the facility in question.
Identify location of attached documentation:
section and/or page numbers
16. Ground water Protection System {16.40(3)(a)16.}: Will a ground water protection system be
employed?
r8] Yes D No
If a ground water protection system will be employed, describe the general features and components
of the system which will prevent the migration of leachate and avoid adverse impact to the ground
water.
If a ground water protection system will not be employed, demonstrate that the facility will not
discharge leachate that presents a threat of adverse impact to ground water.
Identify location of attached explanation:
Section 2.5, Page 2-3
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 15 of 42
21. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Combustion Facilities {16.40(3)(c)}
Complete Part II.B. if site assignment is sought for a combustion facility.
1. Zone I of Public Water Supply {16.40(3)(c)1.}: Will any waste handling area be within the Zone I of a
public water supply?
0 Yes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
2. IWPA or Zone II of Existing Supply or Proposed Drinking Water Source Area {16.40(3)(c)2.}: Will any
waste processing area be within:
a) the Interim Wellhead Protection Area (IWPA) of an existing public supply
0 Yes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
b) Zone II of an existing public water supply
DYes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
c) a proposed drinking water source area, provided that the documentation necessary to obtain a
source approval has been submitted prior to the earlier of either the site assignment application,
or if the MEPA process does apply, the Secretary's Certificate on the Environmental Notification
Form or Notice of Project Change, or where applicable, the Secretary's Certificate on the EIR or
Final EIR,
0 Yes D No
sw0138ap.doc.doc o 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 o Page 16 of 42
22. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Combustion Facilities {16.40(3)(c)} (cont.)
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to all the above is "No," do not respond to the following and go on to section 11.8.3. If
the answer to any of the above is "Yes," respond to the following requests:
Supply information to demonstrate to the Department that the risk of an adverse impact to the ground
water will be minimized.
Identify location of attached information:
section and/or page numbers
Supply information to demonstrate to the Department that at least one of the following is true:
1) The proposed facility cannot reasonably be sited outside the IWPA or Zone II.
2) If the site has been previously used for solid waste management activities, there would be a net
environmental benefit to the ground water by siting the facility within the Zone II or the IWPA.
Identify location of attached information:
section and/or page numbers
3. Zone A of Surface Water Supply {16.40(3){c)3.}: Will the waste processing area be within the Zone A
of a surface water supply?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 17 of 42
23. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Combustion Facilities{16.40(3)(c)} (cont.)
4. Within 500 feet Upgradient or Otherwise within 250 Feet of an Existing or Potential Private Water
Supply Well {16.40{3)(c)4.}: Will the waste processing area be within 500 feet upgradient, and where
not upgradient, within 250 feet, of a private water supply well existing or established as a potential
supply at the time of submittal of the application?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to question 11.8.4 is "yes," attach documentation showing a valid option to purchase
each such supply. Also indicate whether a replacement drinking water supply will be provided.
Identify location of attached documentation:
section and/or page numbers
5. Two Foot Depth to Ground Water {16.40(3){c)5.}: Will the maximum high ground water level be less
than 2 feet below the surface in any waste handling or processing area?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If "yes," indicate how the project can be designed to maintain a two foot separation.
Identify location of explanation:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 18 of 42
24. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Combustion Facilities {16.40(3)(c)} (cont.)
6. 500 Feet to Various Occupied Facilities {16.40{3){c)6.}: Will any waste handling or processing area
be within 500 feet of any of the following {excluding equipment storage or maintenance structures):
• an occupied residential dwelling,
• health care facility
• prison,
• Elementary School
• middle school
• high school
• children's' pre-school
• licensed day care center
• senior center
• youth center
D Yes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to 11.8.6. is "yes", attach documentation showing evidence of a valid option to purchase
the facility in question.
Identify location of attached documentation:
section and/or page numbers
7. Riverfront Area {16.40{3}{c)7.}: Will the waste handling area be within the Riverfront Area as defined
at 310 CMR 10.00?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01,38 • Page 19 of 42
25. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities {16.40(3)(d)}
Complete Part II.C if site assignment is sought for a waste handling and processing facility (all
facilities other than landfills and combustion facilities).
1. Zone I of Public Water Supply {16.40(3)(d)1.}: Will any waste handling area be within the Zone I of a
public water supply?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
2. IWPA or Zone II of Existing Supply or Proposed Drinking Water Source Area {16.40(3)(d)2.}: Will any
waste handling or processing area be within:
a) the Interim Wellhead Protection Area (IWPA) of an existing public supply
DYes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
b) the Zone II of an existing public water supply
DYes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
c) a proposed drinking water source area, provided that the documentation necessary to obtain a
source approval has been submitted prior to the earlier of either the site assignment application,
or if the MEPA process does apply, the Secretary's Certificate on the Environmental Notification
Form or Notice of Project Change, or where applicable, the Secretary's Certificate on the EIR or
Final EIR,
DYes 0 No
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 20 of 42
26. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities {16.40(3)(d)} (cont.)
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to II.C.2.a, b and c is "No," do not respond to the following and go on to section II.C.3.
If the answer to II.C.2.a, b or cis "Yes," respond to the following requests.
Supply information to demonstrate to the Department that the risk of an adverse impact to the ground
water will be minimized.
Identify location of attached information:
section and/or page numbers
Supply information to demonstrate to the Department that at least one of the following is true:
1) The proposed facility cannot reasonably be sited outside the IWPA or Zone II.
2) If the site has been previously used for solid waste management activities, there would be a net
environmental benefit to the ground water by siting the facility within the Zone II or the IWPA.
Identify location of attached information:
section and/or page numbers
3. Zone A of Surface Water Supply {16.40(3)(d)3.}: Will the waste handling or processing area be within
the Zone A of a surface water supply?
0 Yes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 21 of 42
27. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities {16.40(3)(d}} (cont.)
4. Within 500 feet Upgradient or Otherwise within 250 Feet of an Existing or Potential Private Water
Supply Well {16.40(3)(d)4.}: Will the waste handling or processing area be within 500 feet upgradient,
and where not upgradient, within 250 feet, of a private water supply well existing or established as a
potential supply at the time of submittal of the application?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to question II.C.4 is "yes," attach documentation showing a valid option to purchase
each such supply. Also indicate whether a replacement drinking water supply will be provided.
Identify location of attached documentation:
section and/or page numbers
5. Minimum Distances to Various Occupied Facilities {16.40(3)(d)5.}:
a) Is the facility a transfer station using a fully enclosed storage system such as a compactor unit
that proposes to receive less than or equal to 50 tons per day of solid waste
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
Note: b) Is the waste handling area 250 feet or less from any of the following (excluding equipment
Respond to this storage or maintenance structures)
question if the
answer to • an occupied residential dwelling,
question a)
above is "Yes." • health care facility
• prison,
• Elementary School
• middle school
• high school
• children's' pre-school
• licensed day care center
• senior center
• youth center
DYes D No
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 22 of 42
28. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities {16.40(3)(d)} (cont.)
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
Note: c) Is the waste handling area 500 feet or less from any of the following (excluding equipment
Respond to this storage or maintenance structures)
question if the
answer to • an occupied residential dwelling,
question a) • health care facility
above is "No."
• prison,
• Elementary School
• middle school
• high school
• children's' pre-school
• licensed day care center
• senior center
• youth center
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
6. Riverfront Area {16.40(3)(d)6.}: Will the waste handling area be within the Riverfront Area as defined
at 310 CMR 10.00?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 23 of 42
29. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Waste Handling and Processing Facilities {16.40(3)(d)} (cont.)
7. Two Foot Depth to Ground Water {16.40(3)(d)7.}: Will the maximum high ground water level be less
than 2 feet below the surface in any waste handling or processing area?
0 Yes 0 No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
If "yes," indicate how the project can be designed to maintain a two foot separation.
Identify location of explanation:
section and/or page
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 24 of 42
30. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention -Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
Section Ill. General Criteria {16.40(4)}
All applicants should complete all sections of Part Ill.
Note: When a response includes a description of a potential adverse impact, the applicant should
describe both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the potential impact.
A. Agricultural Land {16.40(4)(a)}
1. Does the site contain any land classified as Prime, Unique, or of State and Local Importance by the
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service?
DYes [g) No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
2. Does the site contain any land deemed Land Actively Devoted to Agricultural or Horticultural Uses,
except where the facility is an agricultural composting facility?
DYes [g) No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
3. Will the facility be less than 100 feet from any land classified as Prime, Unique, or of State and Local
Importance by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service?
DYes [g) No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 25 of 42
31. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility 10# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
A. Agricultural Land {16.40(4)(a)} (cont.)
4. Will the facility be less than 100 feet from any land deemed Land Actively Devoted to Agricultural or
Horticultural Uses, except where the facility is an agricultural composting facility?
DYes [8] No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
B. Traffic Impacts {16.40(4)(b)}
1. ENF/EIR Accepted by MEPA
If the applicant prepared an Environmental Notification Form (ENF) to comply with the requirements
of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), please attach all portions of the ENF that are
relevant to traffic impacts. If the applicant was also required to submit an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) to comply with MEPA, please attach all portions of the EIR relevant to traffic impacts.
[8] ENF/EIR traffic impacts attached
D ENF/EIR not required
Identify location of attachments or comments:
Section 3.1, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
2. ENF/EIR Not Required by MEPA
If no ENF or EIR was required to comply with MEPA, please provide the following information in an
attachment:
a) Maximum number of trips to the site per day by type of vehicle:
b) Indicate, by vehicle type, the anticipated number of trips that will be made on each of the roads
serving the facility.
c) Identify any intersections, school zones, hospitals, or other locations on the roads serving the
facility that may be adversely impacted by traffic accessing the site.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 26 of 42
32. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
B. Traffic Impacts {16.40(4)(b)} (cont.)
Identify the location of the attached information or comments
section and/or page numbers
C. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat {16.40(4)(c)}
The Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) of the Massachusetts Division of
Fisheries and Wildlife administers the programs dealing with the Wildlife and Wildlife Habitats
referred to in these questions. The NHESP should be contacted to obtain the information and
documentation needed to respond to the questions in this section.
The applicant must obtain a specific response from NHESP regarding the proposed site and attach
the response to this application.
1. Habitat of Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern Animal or Plant: Is the proposed site within
the habitat of a state-listed Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern animal or plant, as
documented by the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program in its database?
[SJ Yes D No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 3.2, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
2. Ecologically Significant Natural Communities: Is the proposed site located in or adjacent to an area
described on the most recent map of Ecologically Significant Natural Communities as documented by
the Natural Heritage Program in its database?
DYes D No
Identify location of supporting information:
Section 3.2, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 27 of 42
33. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat {16.40(4)(c)} (cont.)
3. Wildlife Management Area: Is the proposed site located in an area adjacent to or with the potential to
impact upon a Wildlife Management Area designated and managed by the Division of Fisheries and
Wildlife?
DYes [ZJ No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 3.2, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
Instructions: If the answer to any of the above questions (III.C.1., III.C.2. or III.C.3.) is "yes," and the
proposed facility does have the potential to adversely impact one or more Endangered, Threatened,
or Special Concern animals or plants or Wildlife Management Area, then answer questions Ill. CA.
and, if necessary, III.C.5. If the answer to each of the above questions (III.C.1., III.C.2. and III.C.3.) is
"no," do not answer question III.C.4. or III.C.5.
4. Adverse Impact on Habitat: Will the proposed site have an adverse impact on the habitat of a state-
listed Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern animal or plant, Ecologically Significant Natural
Community, or Wildlife Management Area, as determined by the Natural Heritage and Endangered
Species Program? (Attach determination from NHESP.)
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
No- See Section 3.2, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
Instructions: If the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program has determined there will not
be an adverse impact, do not answer question III.C.5. If NHESP determined there is a potential for
an adverse impact, respond to question III.C.5.
5. Mitigation of Adverse Impacts: If there is a determination by the Natural Heritage and Endangered
Species Program that the proposed facility may potentially impact the habitat of a state-listed
Endangered, Threatened or Special Concern animal or plant, Ecologically Significant Natural
Community, or Wildlife Management Area, are there any reasonable mitigation measures the
proponent may use to minimize or eliminate any adverse impacts?
[ZJ Yes D No
If "no," then the site is unsuitable and the proposed facility shall not be sited.
If "yes," then with regard to this criterion the site may be assigned with conditions which will meet
Division of Fisheries and Wildlife approval for mitigation of the adverse impacts. The mitigation
measures proposed shall be appended to this application.
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 28 of 42
34. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention - Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
C. Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat {16.40(4)(c)} (cont.)
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Section 3.2, Page 3-1
section and/or page numbers
D. Areas of Critical Environmental Concern {16.40(4)(d)}
Programs for designating and protecting Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) are
administered by the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA). EOEA should be contacted to
obtain the information and documentation needed to respond to the questions in section 111.0.
Responses by EOEA should be appended to this application.
A specific response from EOEA is not required when EOEA's data show the site is not located near
any ACEC.
1. Site Within ACEC: Is the proposed site located within the boundaries of an area designated as an
Area of Critical Environmental Concern by the Secretary of EOEA?
DYes lSI No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Priority Resource Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
If the answer to question 111.0.1. is "yes, the site is not suitable.
2. Site Adjacent to ACEC: Is the proposed site adjacent to an ACEC with the potential to impact the
resources designated by the Secretary of EOEA as worthy of protection? (As defined in 16.02,
"adjacent" may include areas not contiguous to the boundaries of the site.)
DYes lSI No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Priority Resource Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2102 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 29 of 42
35. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Waste Prevention- Solid Waste Management
W074719
BWP SW 01 Site Suitability Report for a New Site Transmittal Number
Assignment
BWP SW 38 Site Suitability for a Major Modification Facility ID# (if known)
of an Existing Site Assignment
D. Areas of Critical Environmental Concern {16.40(4)(d)} (cont.)
3. Mitigation Measures: If there is a determination by EOEA that the proposed facility may potentially
adversely impact the ACE€, are there any reasonable mitigation measures the proponent may use to
minimize or eliminate any adverse impacts?
DYes D No
If "no," the site is not suitable.
If "yes," then with regard to this criterion the site may be assigned with conditions which will meet
EOEA approval for mitigation of the adverse impacts. The mitigation measures proposed shall be
appended to this application.
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
section and/or page numbers
E. Protection of Open Space {6.40(4)(e)}
1. State Forests: Will the proposed solid waste management facility have an adverse impact on the
physical environment of, or on the use and enjoyment of state forests?
DYes I2Sl No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
2. State or Municipal Lands: Will the proposed solid waste management facility have an adverse impact
on the physical environment of, or on the use and enjoyment of state or municipal parklands or
conservation land, or other open space held for natural resource purposes in accordance with Article
97 of the Massachusetts Constitution?
DYes I2Sl No
Identify location of supporting information or comments:
Appendix B Water Resources and Land Use Site Plan and Land Use Map (MassGIS)
section and/or page numbers
sw0138ap.doc.doc • 2/02 BWP SW 01, 38 • Page 30 of 42