means to listen deeper

2. i think we’re missing what it (tech/life) could be..
big time..
and perhaps.. precisely because we’ve still got
that hierarchical format for listening..
ie: you can’t hear me.. i can’t hear me

3. and so..
we need a means/mech/tech
to listen to and facil
all the voices (w/o judgment)
everyday

4. and it matters (ginorm small) that all the voices are coming from alive people..
so..
the mech/infra has to also wake/detox us up

5. 1 there’s no way we (a person) can listen to all the voices
2 trying to (listen to all the voices) is one of our biggest.. shiny ness .. problems.. our
focus should be to listen to our own heart/voice.. otherwise we’re spinning our wheels
listening to not-us voices.. (reason for 2 convo infra)
3 even if you could listen.. ie: hear me now.. the infra/system is set up that first i need
to be speaking your language.. which takes up my day.. so that by the time i get to
your language.. i’m never speaking that original voice/message anyway.. (reason for
idio-jargon‘d self-talk infra)
4 even if you could listen.. ie: hear me now.. our intoxicated default is to
judge/hate/whatever.. rather than just take in the input and try to connect it.. (reason for
simple mech infra)
from as-it-could-be
language as control/enclosure et al

6. listening to 8b daily curiosities (w/o judgment)
and using that data (self-talk as data])
to connect us to selves/others (augment our interconnectedness)

7. from https://redefineschool.com/as-it-could-be-doc/
perhaps this is what the world needs most ..(more than figuring out
knowledge/coordination/planning/whatever)
the energy of 8b alive people.. and trusting that that would be enough.
so perhaps a better use of tech/ai would be..
augmenting our interconnectedness (to self/others/nature)
‘we have seen advances in every aspect of our lives except our humanity’–
Luma Mufleh

8. brief summary:
tech listens for key words from daily self-talk/curiosities..
then matches local people daily via those key words
believing that what is lacking in all of us (and so what we should/could focus on)
are two basic needs (attachment and authenticity)
so using 2 conversations as infrastructure to reconnect/refill us
from https://redefineschool.com/as-it-could-be-doc/

9. from https://redefineschool.com/as-it-could-be-doc/
safety/rivalry/whatever.. would/could all become irrelevant if we make
sure that:
1 everyone (has to be all of us) is included ..
and that it is done
2 sans money (any form of measuring/accounting)..
ie: gershenfeld something else law

10. from https://redefineschool.com/as-it-could-be-doc/
this is something we’ve not yet tried.. but we do have the means
balancing out needs/resources.. would depend on our ability to trust that the
dance of 8b truly free people.. (an undisturbed ecosystem) would be enough
in undisturbed ecosystems ..the average individual, species, or population, left
to its own devices, behaves in ways that serve and stabilize the whole..’
–Dana Meadows

12. after 10+ years of
experimentation/research/listening
1 undisturbed ecosystemcommoning is possible/legit
2 need to figure out a way to ground the seeming chaos of 8b free people

13. perhaps this is tech.. as it could be...
a means to listen & connect
in order to undo our hierarchical listening

14. tech as it could be..
getting us back/to non hierarchicial listening..
to selves/others/nature..
everyday