A new rule previously adopted by the PA Environmental Quality Board has just officially been published (Jan 26, 2013) in the Pennsylvania Bulletin--making the new rule official. The rule sets requirements for the preparation and implementation of emergency plans at Marcellus Shale drilling sites.
Environmental Assessments for Energy, Infrastructure and Resource projects ...This account is closed
Understanding the new Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and how it relates to applicable provincial environmental assessment and planning legislation is critical to the success of your projects. Navigating the challenges of multiple government bodies, project scoping considerations and your consultation responsibilities with First Nations are key to the approval process. Obtaining approvals for these assessments may unlock opportunities or cause challenges.
Presenters:
David Estrin, Partner, Gowlings (Toronto Office)
Rodney V. Northey, Partner, Gowlings (Toronto Office)
This bill aims to provide tools to local communities to make solar permitting more efficient. It establishes a program to provide competitive and challenge grants to local governments that adopt best practices for solar permitting. The Secretary of Energy would define best practices and provide voluntary certification for adopting them. Grants could be used for training, developing permitting tools, and pilot projects to standardize and streamline permitting processes. The Secretary could rescind funds from grantees that fail to implement committed permitting reforms. Grantees would need to provide matching funds.
This document provides a summary of updates to four environmental rules: the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) rule, the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) rule, and the Boiler MACT rules for major and area sources. It outlines the regulatory background and timeline for finalizing new rules in response to court orders remanding and vacating the original rules. Key elements that may be affected in the final rules are the standards for defining solid waste versus fuels, applicability and compliance deadlines.
Radical Enviro Groups' Notice of Intent to Sue the EPA to Force Regulation of...Marcellus Drilling News
Another "sue and settle" lawsuit that attempts to force the federal Environmental Protection Agency to illegally regulate oil and gas drilling--which Constitutionally is left up to the individual states. It is a sleazy way to stop fracking and drilling for what these groups consider to be "dirty" fossil fuels.
This regulatory update from Environmental Asset Services provides information on regulations that took effect or were proposed between December 1-31, 2017 across various areas including air, hazardous waste, threatened species, and water quality. Key highlights include the EPA withdrawing a rule on composite wood products and denying a petition to regulate animal feeding operations under the Clean Air Act. The document aims to help clients comply with evolving environmental, health, and safety policies.
Several bills were introduced relating to flood planning, notification, and preparedness as well as eminent domain reform. For flood issues, bills addressed statewide planning and funding, creating notification systems for dam releases and disasters, and conducting local infrastructure studies. Reforms for eminent domain included new meeting requirements, survey notice standards, clarifying "actual progress" criteria, and allowing landowners to recover damages from adjacent easement uses.
The document discusses considerations for using water quality offsets to help sewage treatment plants meet effluent discharge requirements for substances like total phosphorus. It outlines two mechanisms Ontario allows for offsets - site-specific arrangements and a potential trading program. Key criteria the Ministry may require are demonstrating offsets are a last resort, having monitoring agreements, contingency plans if offsets underperform, and consultation during project planning. The article provides an overview of evaluation criteria still under development to help practitioners explore offset options.
Environmental Law Update | Werksmans Attorneys | 21 November 2012Werksmans Attorneys
The document provides an update on recent legal developments in South Africa relating to the environmental regulation of mining activities. It discusses the origins of disputes between environmental and minerals authorities, highlights key legal cases including Maccsand v City of Cape Town, and outlines the current legal position. It also covers implications for new and existing mining operations, provides a hypothetical case study on hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo region, discusses proposed reforms to mining legislation, and considers the ideal legal framework.
Environmental Assessments for Energy, Infrastructure and Resource projects ...This account is closed
Understanding the new Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and how it relates to applicable provincial environmental assessment and planning legislation is critical to the success of your projects. Navigating the challenges of multiple government bodies, project scoping considerations and your consultation responsibilities with First Nations are key to the approval process. Obtaining approvals for these assessments may unlock opportunities or cause challenges.
Presenters:
David Estrin, Partner, Gowlings (Toronto Office)
Rodney V. Northey, Partner, Gowlings (Toronto Office)
This bill aims to provide tools to local communities to make solar permitting more efficient. It establishes a program to provide competitive and challenge grants to local governments that adopt best practices for solar permitting. The Secretary of Energy would define best practices and provide voluntary certification for adopting them. Grants could be used for training, developing permitting tools, and pilot projects to standardize and streamline permitting processes. The Secretary could rescind funds from grantees that fail to implement committed permitting reforms. Grantees would need to provide matching funds.
This document provides a summary of updates to four environmental rules: the Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) rule, the Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerator (CISWI) rule, and the Boiler MACT rules for major and area sources. It outlines the regulatory background and timeline for finalizing new rules in response to court orders remanding and vacating the original rules. Key elements that may be affected in the final rules are the standards for defining solid waste versus fuels, applicability and compliance deadlines.
Radical Enviro Groups' Notice of Intent to Sue the EPA to Force Regulation of...Marcellus Drilling News
Another "sue and settle" lawsuit that attempts to force the federal Environmental Protection Agency to illegally regulate oil and gas drilling--which Constitutionally is left up to the individual states. It is a sleazy way to stop fracking and drilling for what these groups consider to be "dirty" fossil fuels.
This regulatory update from Environmental Asset Services provides information on regulations that took effect or were proposed between December 1-31, 2017 across various areas including air, hazardous waste, threatened species, and water quality. Key highlights include the EPA withdrawing a rule on composite wood products and denying a petition to regulate animal feeding operations under the Clean Air Act. The document aims to help clients comply with evolving environmental, health, and safety policies.
Several bills were introduced relating to flood planning, notification, and preparedness as well as eminent domain reform. For flood issues, bills addressed statewide planning and funding, creating notification systems for dam releases and disasters, and conducting local infrastructure studies. Reforms for eminent domain included new meeting requirements, survey notice standards, clarifying "actual progress" criteria, and allowing landowners to recover damages from adjacent easement uses.
The document discusses considerations for using water quality offsets to help sewage treatment plants meet effluent discharge requirements for substances like total phosphorus. It outlines two mechanisms Ontario allows for offsets - site-specific arrangements and a potential trading program. Key criteria the Ministry may require are demonstrating offsets are a last resort, having monitoring agreements, contingency plans if offsets underperform, and consultation during project planning. The article provides an overview of evaluation criteria still under development to help practitioners explore offset options.
Environmental Law Update | Werksmans Attorneys | 21 November 2012Werksmans Attorneys
The document provides an update on recent legal developments in South Africa relating to the environmental regulation of mining activities. It discusses the origins of disputes between environmental and minerals authorities, highlights key legal cases including Maccsand v City of Cape Town, and outlines the current legal position. It also covers implications for new and existing mining operations, provides a hypothetical case study on hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo region, discusses proposed reforms to mining legislation, and considers the ideal legal framework.
This document provides a summary of a presentation on stormwater management regulations in Virginia. It discusses updates to the Virginia Stormwater Management Program including shifting control from the state to local governments by July 2014. Local governments must develop stormwater programs by June 2013 that meet new regulatory requirements focused on reducing runoff volume and improving water quality. The presentation reviews tools and timelines to help local governments develop compliant stormwater programs.
The (Conoco) Conquista Site in Texas was formerly used for uranium milling from 1972 to 1982. Remediation activities are being conducted by the site owner, Continental Oil Company (CONOCO), to consolidate contaminated mill tailings, soil, and debris into an onsite disposal cell. In 2002, the U.S. Department of Energy will assume responsibility for long-term stewardship activities at the 243 hectare site, including monitoring of the disposal cell and contaminated groundwater. The estimated annual long-term stewardship cost from 2000 to 2006 is $38,943.
A draft of Permit Coordination Policy from the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection. These new policies will speed up the reveiw process for drilling permits and help the DEP focus on "high value" permits first. The new policies were created in response to an executive order from Gov. Tom Corbett--an effort to cut the red tape involved in permitting new gas and oil wells in PA.
Air Emission Permitting and Reporting Requirements Under Environmental Lawssbligh0101
The document discusses various air emissions permitting and reporting requirements under US environmental laws. It covers:
1) Permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act for new sources, including best available control technology requirements.
2) Title V operating permit requirements for major sources and other applicable sources.
3) Reporting requirements under laws like the Clean Air Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act. These include emissions reporting, toxic chemical inventory reporting, and other notices.
The document provides a summary of recent legal updates related to planning and environment law in the UK. It discusses several notable cases related to topics such as enforcement, heritage, development planning, neighbourhood plans, green belt designations, housing, and environmental impact assessments (EIAs). For example, it summarizes a case that clarified an inspector's power to grant permission for a lesser development scheme when enforcing a larger one. It also discusses cases related to conservation area designations, interpreting saved policies, and the tests for assessing neighbourhood development plans.
What is a Shoreline Management Plan?
Developed in partnership by local authorities, regulators and other stakeholders, a Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) is a high level non-statutory policy document designed to assist coastal flood and erosion risk management planning. It provides a large-scale assessment of the risks (to people, property, the natural and historic environment) associated with coastal erosion and flooding at the coast over the long-term. It also proposes policies to help manage these risks sustainably over the next hundred years.
The SMP enables planners and regulators to plan for and manage the way that the coast will change. This could be by maintaining or improving defences, by enabling the natural processes to play a greater role, creating new natural habitat or by helping areas that are at risk of flooding at some point in the future to cope with and limit the impact of flooding events.
The SMP2 for the Severn Estuary updates an earlier SMP1 (2000) for the estuary. It aims to provide more certainty for landowners, residents and businesses; to know how the coast will be managed by regulators during the next 100 years, so that they can plan ahead and make decisions about investments, homes, development and the management of their resources.
EPA New Rules Governing Air Pollution Standards for Hydraulic FracturingMarcellus Drilling News
New rules (40 CFR Part 63) issued by the Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday, April 18 that will govern air pollution standards at oil and gas drilling operations, in particular at well sites using hydraulic fracturing (fracking). The EPA claims that the new standards will mean drillers will capture more gas that currently "leaks" into the atmosphere during drilling completions, and that the extra gas can be sold to offset the cost of new equipment and procedures required under the regulations.
PennEnvironment: Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling Violiations in PA 2008-2011Marcellus Drilling News
This document analyzes environmental violations by Marcellus Shale gas drilling companies in Pennsylvania between 2008-2011. It found a total of 3,355 violations by 64 companies, with over 2,300 posing a direct environmental threat. The top violations related to erosion/sedimentation plans and pollution prevention. The companies with the most violations were Cabot Oil & Gas Corp, Chesapeake Appalachia LLC, and Chief Oil & Gas LLC. Stricter penalties, bonding requirements, and increased funding for enforcement are recommended to curb violations.
Letter sent on Sept. 20, 2011 by 119 groups and associations to President Obama encouraging his administration to not further regulate hydraulic fracturing, but instead to support the practice as a way of creating thousands of new jobs.
Marcellus Shale and Local Collection of State Taxes: What the 2011 Pennsylva...Marcellus Drilling News
A research report issued March 30, 2012 by the Penn State Center for Economic and Community Development. The report shows that, based on sales tax revenues collected, counties in PA with Marcellus drilling are doing better economically than those without drilling.
Emails obtained by Gannett News Service under a Freedom of Information request that show communication between the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 2008 to 2012 on the matter of proposed hydraulic fracturing activity in New York State. The emails are mostly cordial. Some interesting bits of history, but nothing earth shatteringly new about the communications.
Senate Bill 2248, introduced by Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK). The bill would grant states the uncontested right to regulate hydraulic fracturing within their own borders, even on federal lands. A similar bill was introduce in the house, H.R. 4322, by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX).
The final version of drilling regulations that will allow shale gas drilling on land protected by the Delaware River Basin Commission. These rules are the culimination of several years of research and hearings by the DRBC.
Range Resources Appeal to South Fayette Township, PA Zoning Hearing BoardMarcellus Drilling News
Range Resources appeal to the South Fayette Township, PA zoning hearing board requesting that regulations banning Marcellus gas drilling be revised or struck down. Range says the rules, passed in November 2010, essentially prevent range from drilling on any of its 4,000 acres of leaseholds in the township.
"Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Performed on the Łebień LE-2H Well in Poland" - An indepth study performed by the Polish Geological Institute on the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing at a well site in Poland carried out in August 2011. The study finds that soil, air and water are not negatively impacted by fracking when it's done according to regulation.
Executive Order 4-11 signed by Acting Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, directing the state Department of Environmental Protection to draw up temporary rules restricting hydraulic fracturing and Marcellus Shale drilling in the state--until the legislature can pass a set of permanent laws.
Sierra Club Protest Filed Against Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Export FacilityMarcellus Drilling News
The official Sierra Club protest filed with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), requesting that a new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility not be allowed to be built in Sabine Pass, LA. The new LNG facility was recently approved by the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC).
Three federal agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Interior and the Department of Energy, announced a formal partnership on April 13, 2012 to study unconventional oil and gas. That is, a partnership to research hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"). The three will pool resources and research on the issue of fracking with an eye to how they can regulate it.
U.S. Bureau of Land Management New Rules for Fracking on Federally-Owned LandsMarcellus Drilling News
Newly proposed rules, released on May 4 by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management that will govern hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian-owned lands in the U.S. The new rules require all chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing to be publically disclosed, rules for how wells are cased, and rules requiring drillers to get plans pre-approved for wastewater disposal.
Terry Engelder Letter to PNAS Objecting to Publication of Duke Study on Brine...Marcellus Drilling News
Penn State professor Dr. Terry Engelder peer reviewed a new study by Duke University on the possible migration of brine (salty water) from thousands of feet below the surface into surface water aquifers. The implication is that drilling fluids may also find their way to the surface along the same pathways. Engelder says in his objections that important issues are not addressed in this study and therefore it does not deserve peer reviewed publication in PNAS.
A report titled “Economic Assessment Report for the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on New York State’s Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Regulatory Program,” commissioned by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and researched and written by Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C.
This document provides a summary of a presentation on stormwater management regulations in Virginia. It discusses updates to the Virginia Stormwater Management Program including shifting control from the state to local governments by July 2014. Local governments must develop stormwater programs by June 2013 that meet new regulatory requirements focused on reducing runoff volume and improving water quality. The presentation reviews tools and timelines to help local governments develop compliant stormwater programs.
The (Conoco) Conquista Site in Texas was formerly used for uranium milling from 1972 to 1982. Remediation activities are being conducted by the site owner, Continental Oil Company (CONOCO), to consolidate contaminated mill tailings, soil, and debris into an onsite disposal cell. In 2002, the U.S. Department of Energy will assume responsibility for long-term stewardship activities at the 243 hectare site, including monitoring of the disposal cell and contaminated groundwater. The estimated annual long-term stewardship cost from 2000 to 2006 is $38,943.
A draft of Permit Coordination Policy from the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection. These new policies will speed up the reveiw process for drilling permits and help the DEP focus on "high value" permits first. The new policies were created in response to an executive order from Gov. Tom Corbett--an effort to cut the red tape involved in permitting new gas and oil wells in PA.
Air Emission Permitting and Reporting Requirements Under Environmental Lawssbligh0101
The document discusses various air emissions permitting and reporting requirements under US environmental laws. It covers:
1) Permitting requirements under the Clean Air Act for new sources, including best available control technology requirements.
2) Title V operating permit requirements for major sources and other applicable sources.
3) Reporting requirements under laws like the Clean Air Act, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and Toxic Substances Control Act. These include emissions reporting, toxic chemical inventory reporting, and other notices.
The document provides a summary of recent legal updates related to planning and environment law in the UK. It discusses several notable cases related to topics such as enforcement, heritage, development planning, neighbourhood plans, green belt designations, housing, and environmental impact assessments (EIAs). For example, it summarizes a case that clarified an inspector's power to grant permission for a lesser development scheme when enforcing a larger one. It also discusses cases related to conservation area designations, interpreting saved policies, and the tests for assessing neighbourhood development plans.
What is a Shoreline Management Plan?
Developed in partnership by local authorities, regulators and other stakeholders, a Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) is a high level non-statutory policy document designed to assist coastal flood and erosion risk management planning. It provides a large-scale assessment of the risks (to people, property, the natural and historic environment) associated with coastal erosion and flooding at the coast over the long-term. It also proposes policies to help manage these risks sustainably over the next hundred years.
The SMP enables planners and regulators to plan for and manage the way that the coast will change. This could be by maintaining or improving defences, by enabling the natural processes to play a greater role, creating new natural habitat or by helping areas that are at risk of flooding at some point in the future to cope with and limit the impact of flooding events.
The SMP2 for the Severn Estuary updates an earlier SMP1 (2000) for the estuary. It aims to provide more certainty for landowners, residents and businesses; to know how the coast will be managed by regulators during the next 100 years, so that they can plan ahead and make decisions about investments, homes, development and the management of their resources.
EPA New Rules Governing Air Pollution Standards for Hydraulic FracturingMarcellus Drilling News
New rules (40 CFR Part 63) issued by the Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday, April 18 that will govern air pollution standards at oil and gas drilling operations, in particular at well sites using hydraulic fracturing (fracking). The EPA claims that the new standards will mean drillers will capture more gas that currently "leaks" into the atmosphere during drilling completions, and that the extra gas can be sold to offset the cost of new equipment and procedures required under the regulations.
PennEnvironment: Marcellus Shale Gas Drilling Violiations in PA 2008-2011Marcellus Drilling News
This document analyzes environmental violations by Marcellus Shale gas drilling companies in Pennsylvania between 2008-2011. It found a total of 3,355 violations by 64 companies, with over 2,300 posing a direct environmental threat. The top violations related to erosion/sedimentation plans and pollution prevention. The companies with the most violations were Cabot Oil & Gas Corp, Chesapeake Appalachia LLC, and Chief Oil & Gas LLC. Stricter penalties, bonding requirements, and increased funding for enforcement are recommended to curb violations.
Letter sent on Sept. 20, 2011 by 119 groups and associations to President Obama encouraging his administration to not further regulate hydraulic fracturing, but instead to support the practice as a way of creating thousands of new jobs.
Marcellus Shale and Local Collection of State Taxes: What the 2011 Pennsylva...Marcellus Drilling News
A research report issued March 30, 2012 by the Penn State Center for Economic and Community Development. The report shows that, based on sales tax revenues collected, counties in PA with Marcellus drilling are doing better economically than those without drilling.
Emails obtained by Gannett News Service under a Freedom of Information request that show communication between the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 2008 to 2012 on the matter of proposed hydraulic fracturing activity in New York State. The emails are mostly cordial. Some interesting bits of history, but nothing earth shatteringly new about the communications.
Senate Bill 2248, introduced by Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK). The bill would grant states the uncontested right to regulate hydraulic fracturing within their own borders, even on federal lands. A similar bill was introduce in the house, H.R. 4322, by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX).
The final version of drilling regulations that will allow shale gas drilling on land protected by the Delaware River Basin Commission. These rules are the culimination of several years of research and hearings by the DRBC.
Range Resources Appeal to South Fayette Township, PA Zoning Hearing BoardMarcellus Drilling News
Range Resources appeal to the South Fayette Township, PA zoning hearing board requesting that regulations banning Marcellus gas drilling be revised or struck down. Range says the rules, passed in November 2010, essentially prevent range from drilling on any of its 4,000 acres of leaseholds in the township.
"Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Performed on the Łebień LE-2H Well in Poland" - An indepth study performed by the Polish Geological Institute on the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing at a well site in Poland carried out in August 2011. The study finds that soil, air and water are not negatively impacted by fracking when it's done according to regulation.
Executive Order 4-11 signed by Acting Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, directing the state Department of Environmental Protection to draw up temporary rules restricting hydraulic fracturing and Marcellus Shale drilling in the state--until the legislature can pass a set of permanent laws.
Sierra Club Protest Filed Against Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Export FacilityMarcellus Drilling News
The official Sierra Club protest filed with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), requesting that a new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility not be allowed to be built in Sabine Pass, LA. The new LNG facility was recently approved by the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC).
Three federal agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Interior and the Department of Energy, announced a formal partnership on April 13, 2012 to study unconventional oil and gas. That is, a partnership to research hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"). The three will pool resources and research on the issue of fracking with an eye to how they can regulate it.
U.S. Bureau of Land Management New Rules for Fracking on Federally-Owned LandsMarcellus Drilling News
Newly proposed rules, released on May 4 by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management that will govern hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian-owned lands in the U.S. The new rules require all chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing to be publically disclosed, rules for how wells are cased, and rules requiring drillers to get plans pre-approved for wastewater disposal.
Terry Engelder Letter to PNAS Objecting to Publication of Duke Study on Brine...Marcellus Drilling News
Penn State professor Dr. Terry Engelder peer reviewed a new study by Duke University on the possible migration of brine (salty water) from thousands of feet below the surface into surface water aquifers. The implication is that drilling fluids may also find their way to the surface along the same pathways. Engelder says in his objections that important issues are not addressed in this study and therefore it does not deserve peer reviewed publication in PNAS.
A report titled “Economic Assessment Report for the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on New York State’s Oil, Gas, and Solution Mining Regulatory Program,” commissioned by the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and researched and written by Ecology and Environment Engineering, P.C.
A presentation titled "The Stability of Fault Systems in the South Shore of the St. Lawrence Lowlands of Quebec - Implications for Shale Gas Development, presented members of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. This is a technical presentation that makes the case that while hydraulic fracturing does indeed cause small seismic events -- "earthquakes" -- those earthquakes are tiny and not detectable on the surface and cause no damage to underground or above ground structures.
An economic analysis and forecast of job trends in Pennsylvania by Wells Fargo Securities' Economics Group. The analysis shows that Marcellus Shale drilling has led to a dramatic growth in jobs in not only counties where drilling is occuring, but also in all of the counties throughout the state--because of shale gas drilling.
An initial outline of changes to be made to Title 25 Pa. Code Chapter 78 (the Oil and Gas Act), a required rewrite part of the recently passed PA Act 13 law governing Marcellus shale gas drilling. This concept paper is not the final language being proposed, but "a starting point" for discussion. The Dept. of Environmental Protection's Oil and Gas Technical Advisory Board is charged with drafting the rewrite.
1) As a result of a catastrophic explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas in 2013, OSHA is considering revisions to its Process Safety Management standard.
2) Two key areas OSHA may clarify are exemptions for flammable liquids in atmospheric storage tanks and using New Jersey's Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act as a model, which defines "catastrophic release" more broadly.
3) The revisions could affect aboveground tank owners by expanding coverage, requiring stricter staffing levels, and defining equipment deficiency timelines.
Pennsylvania’s New Oil and Gas Regulations for Unconventional Wells – Part 1:...CohenGrigsby
The new rules for unconventional oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania are finally here. The regulations in Chapter 78a, relating to unconventional wells, were published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on October 8, 2016.
New rules for hydraulic fracturing from the Maryland Dept. of Environment. The rules are supposedly the strictest in the nation. A quick review shows that with features like a 2,000 foot setback from private water wells, there will be very little, if any, fracking in Maryland.
This regulatory update from CH2M provides summaries of regulations from various agencies in August 2015 related to air, natural resources, nuclear, occupational safety, ozone depleting substances, waste, and water. Key highlights include:
- EPA designated two new equivalent methods for measuring particulate matter and ozone concentrations in ambient air.
- EPA proposed amendments to standards for methane and volatile organic compounds from oil and natural gas sources.
- The Fish and Wildlife Service proposed changes to critical habitat designations and listings of endangered species.
- NRC proposed revisions to criteria for determining abnormal occurrences at nuclear facilities.
- OSHA proposed lowering exposure limits for beryllium in general industries.
AN ACT TO (1) RECONSTITUTE THE MINING COMMISSION AS THE MINING AND ENERGY COMMISSION, (2) REQUIRE THE MINING AND ENERGY COMMISSION AND OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES TO DEVELOP A MODERN REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE STATE, INCLUDING THE USE OF HORIZONTAL DRILLING AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING FOR THAT PURPOSE, (3) AUTHORIZE HORIZONTAL DRILLING AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING, BUT PROHIBIT THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR THESE ACTIVITIES PENDING SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION, (4) ENHANCE LANDOWNER AND PUBLIC PROTECTIONS RELATED TO HORIZONTAL DRILLING AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING, AND (5) ESTABLISH THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON ENERGY POLICY.
The document provides a summary of various US environmental regulations issued in February 2016. Key highlights include:
- EPA announced new enforcement priorities around reducing water pollution from industries and accidental chemical releases. Continuing priorities include reducing air pollution and pollution from animal waste.
- Regulations were amended to expand the definition of destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. Several new species were also listed.
- Proposed amendments to Risk Management Program regulations aim to reduce accidental chemical releases and improve emergency response.
- Amendments add construction wood, paper residuals, and railroad ties to the list of categorical non-waste fuels.
ANALYSIS OF EIA FOR AN ENERGY PROJECT - ASSIGNMENTDoug Robertson
This document provides an analysis of the environmental impact assessment for the proposed Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant in Somerset, England. It describes the project details including location, site development plans, and timelines. It also summarizes the scoping exercise conducted to identify areas of environmental impact, relevant policies and regulations, environmental data collection methods, and considerations around low-level radioactive discharges and their potential effects. The goal of the EIA is to evaluate impacts and address public concerns regarding health and long-term environmental effects.
The hydraulic fracturing "fast track bill," Senate Bill 76, Domestic Energy Jobs Act. General Assembly of North Carolina, Session 2013
SENATE BILL 76 (Edition 7)
To check for newer or updated versions or recent action on this bill follow this link: http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2013&BillID=S76
Finance Committee Substitute Adopted 2/14/13
Seventh Edition Engrossed 6/7/13
Short Title: Domestic Energy Jobs Act
A critique of New York's draft drilling regulations for hydraulic fracturing submitted by Judith Enck, Region 2 Administrator for the federal Environmental Protection Agency. The critique was submitted on Weds, Jan 11 just hours before the filing deadline closed at the New York State DEC.
The document summarizes amendments made in 2020 to India's Emergency Response & Disaster Management Plan (ERDMP) Regulations from 2010. Key changes include:
- Expanding the scope and definitions to include additional petroleum and gas facilities and transportation.
- Requiring entities to appoint a director responsible for compliance and board monitoring.
- Strengthening emergency planning, response, and reporting requirements including increased frequency of mock drills and clearer incident classifications and reporting timelines.
- Updating emergency response organization, notification procedures, and other technical specifications.
This document provides an Environmental Management Framework (EMF) for subprojects under the Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project (RDVRP) in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The EMF outlines screening procedures and mitigation measures to minimize environmental impacts. Subprojects include repairing infrastructure, retrofitting buildings, slope stabilization, coastal protection, and road rehabilitation. The EMF describes the local environment and identifies potential positive and negative impacts such as reduced disaster risk but also construction disturbance. It establishes a screening process to determine study and mitigation requirements for each subproject based on complexity. A generic Environmental Management Plan is also provided to guide simple civil works. The EMF is the tool to help ensure subprojects comply with
The document summarizes evolving air and water regulations for shale gas operations in Ohio. It discusses the Ohio Department of Natural Resources' primary regulatory role over oil and gas activities, with some exceptions delegated to the EPA and other state authorities. It then outlines the EPA's new air regulations for shale gas operations under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards, including requirements for emissions reductions from well completions, compressors, pneumatic controllers, and storage tanks. Finally, it briefly mentions potential water regulations around NPDES permits and dredge/fill permits.
The document summarizes new emergency regulations proposed by the California Public Utilities Commission in response to a major gas leak at an underground storage facility. The regulations establish testing, monitoring, and risk management requirements for underground gas storage projects. Facilities already operating and projects under development must comply with phased deadlines to submit inspection protocols, begin well monitoring, test safety valves, develop risk management plans, and ensure complete project data. Compliance is expected to increase costs significantly for infrastructure, personnel, administration and legal activities. The regulations aim to improve well and reservoir integrity for all underground gas storage operations in California.
This regulatory update from CH2M provides summaries of regulatory changes from the EPA and other agencies in March 2016 related to the environment, health, and safety. Key highlights include:
- The EPA announced availability of new information on proposed regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from medium- and heavy-duty vehicles.
- The EPA updated guidance documents to help entities calculate greenhouse gas emissions from stationary combustion, mobile combustion, and purchased electricity.
- The EPA will begin developing regulations to limit methane emissions from existing oil and gas wells.
- The EPA proposed rules related to refrigerants, risk management programs, sulfur dioxide designations, and sustainable federal building principles.
- The USFWS finalized or
- The document discusses changes to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from construction sites, including: establishing three risk levels; requiring best management practices, effluent monitoring and reporting, and receiving water monitoring; and specifying post-construction stormwater requirements.
- It also summarizes a California Department of Transportation bridge project that received awards for avoiding permitted environmental impacts and protecting water quality during construction.
- The document questions whether substantial evidence supports allegations in an Administrative Civil Liability complaint issued to the construction contractor, arguing some claims are based on ambiguous or unclear evidence.
EPA Draft Permitting Guidance for Oil and Gas Hydraulic Fracturing Activities...Marcellus Drilling News
A draft guidance published by the Environmental Protection Agency in the May 10, 2012 Federal Register. The guidance imposes new rules on drillers who use diesel fuel during hydraulic fracturing. Drillers point out four of the six named so-called diesel fuels are not in fact diesel fuels.
This document provides a summary of various regulatory actions from the EPA in November 2015 affecting air quality, hazardous materials, natural resources, wastewater, and other areas. It lists 11 rules or notices covering topics such as ambient air monitoring methods, boiler emissions standards, refrigerant management requirements, and addition of chemicals to community right-to-know lists. For each entry it identifies the regulatory area affected, affected entities, regulation name and description, and effective dates when given. The summary is intended to keep clients informed of changes that could impact their operations.
This document contains a section-by-section analysis of proposed bipartisan climate change legislation. It outlines 8 sections that would establish a Presidential Commission on Climate Change to develop a national strategy, create an Office of Global Climate Change within DOE, implement a voluntary greenhouse gas emissions reduction program, establish a climate technology research and development program, and require energy research plans to include reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The analysis provides details on the purpose and requirements of each proposed section.
The Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) provided a submission regarding the Mineral and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2016 (MOLA Bill) to the Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources Committee. APPEA seeks amendments to the overlapping tenure provisions and restricted land provisions within the MOLA Bill. For overlapping tenure, APPEA recommends amending clauses 31 and 53 for consistency. For restricted land, APPEA proposes clarifying definitions, adding exemptions, and including a statutory process for resolving disputes similar to conduct and compensation agreements.
Similar to New PA Rule Adopted for Emergency Response Planning at Unconventional Well Sites (20)
The document summarizes five key facts about the recovery of US shale oil production:
1) Rig counts have increased by 90% since bottoming out in May 2016 and are up 30% year-over-year, signaling increased drilling and production capacity.
2) While decline rates remain steep, production profiles have increased substantially due to technological advances, meaning aggregate supply will be stronger.
3) Preliminary data shows that net new shale supply turned positive in December 2016 for the first time since March 2015, recovering just 7 months after rig counts increased.
4) Increased drilling activity is supported by a large stock of drilled but uncompleted wells, demonstrating the recovery and expansion of the shale sector.
5)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
A quarterly update from the legal beagles at global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. A quarterly legislative action update for the second quarter of 2016 looking at previously laws acted upon, and new laws introduced, affecting the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.
An update from Spectra Energy on their proposed $3 billion project to connect four existing pipeline systems to flow more Marcellus/Utica gas to New England. In short, Spectra has put the project on pause until mid-2017 while it attempts to get new customers signed.
A letter from Rover Pipeline to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requesting the agency issue the final certificate that will allow Rover to begin tree-clearing and construction of the 511-mile pipeline through Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and Michigan. If the certificate is delayed beyond the end of 2016, it will delay the project an extra year due to tree-clearing restrictions (to accommodate federally-protected bats).
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
An order issued by the U.S. Dept. of Energy that allows the Elba Island LNG export facility to export LNG to countries with no free trade agreement with the U.S. Countries like Japan and India have no FTA with our country (i.e. friendly countries)--so this is good news indeed. Although the facility would have operated by sending LNG to FTA countries, this order opens the market much wider.
A study released in December 2016 by the London School of Economics, titled "On the Comparative Advantage of U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Shale Gas Revolution." While America has enough shale gas to export plenty of it, exporting it is not as economic as exporting oil due to the elaborate processes to liquefy and regassify natural gas--therefore a lot of the gas stays right here at home, making the U.S. one of (if not the) cheapest places on the planet to establish manufacturing plants, especially for manufacturers that use natural gas and NGLs (natural gas liquids). Therefore, manufacturing, especially in the petrochemical sector, is ramping back up in the U.S. For every two jobs created by fracking, another one job is created in the manufacturing sector.
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
A letter from the attorneys general from 24 of the states opposed to the Obama Clean Power Plan to President-Elect Trump, RINO Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel and RINO House Speaker Paul Ryan. The letter asks Trump to dump the CPP on Day One when he takes office, and asks Congress to adopt legislation to prevent the EPA from such an egregious overreach ever again.
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
Natural gas and wind are the lowest-cost technology options for new electricity generation across much of the U.S. when cost, public health impacts and environmental effects are considered. So says this new research paper released by The University of Texas at Austin. Researchers assessed multiple generation technologies including coal, natural gas, solar, wind and nuclear. Their findings are depicted in a series of maps illustrating the cost of each generation technology on a county-by-county basis throughout the U.S.
Annual report issued by the U.S. Energy Information Administration showing oil and natural gas proved reserves, in this case for 2015. These reports are issued almost a year after the period for which they report. This report shows proved reserves for natural gas dropped by 64.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf), or 16.6%. U.S. crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves also decreased--from 39.9 billion barrels to 35.2 billion barrels (down 11.8%) in 2015. Proved reserves are calculated on a number of factors, including price.
The document is a report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration analyzing oil and gas production from seven regions in the U.S. It includes charts and tables showing historical and projected production levels of oil and gas from each region from 2008 to 2017, as well as metrics like the average production per rig. The regions - Bakken, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Marcellus, Niobrara, Permian, and Utica - accounted for 92% of domestic oil production growth and all domestic natural gas production growth from 2011-2014.
Velocys is the manufacturer of gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants that convert natural gas (a hyrdocarbon) into other hydrocarbons, like diesel fuel, gasoline, and even waxes. This PowerPoint presentation lays out the Velocys plan to get the company growing. GTL plants have not (so far) taken off in the U.S. Velocys hopes to change that. They specialize in small GTL plants.
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
In January 2016, Gov. Wolf announced the DEP would revise its current general permit (GP-5) to update the permitting requirements for sources at natural gas compression, processing, and transmission facilities. This is the revised GP-5.
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
In January 2016, PA Gov. Wolf announced the Dept. of Environmental Protection would develop a general permit for sources at new or modified unconventional well sites and remote pigging stations (GP-5A). This is the proposed permit.
Onerous new regulations for the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale industry proposed by the state Dept. of Environmental Protection. The new regs will, according to the DEP, help PA reduce so-called fugitive methane emissions and some types of air pollution (VOCs). This is liberal Gov. Tom Wolf's way of addressing mythical man-made global warming.
The monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) from the U.S. Energy Information Administration for December 2016. This issue makes a couple of key points re natural gas: (1) EIA predicts that natural gas production in the U.S. for 2016 will see a healthy decline over 2015 levels--1.3 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) less in 2016. That's the first annual production decline since 2005! (2) The EIA predicts the average price for natural gas at the benchmark Henry Hub will climb from $2.49/Mcf (thousand cubic feet) in 2016 to a whopping $3.27/Mcf in 2017. Why the jump? Growing domestic natural gas consumption, along with higher pipeline exports to Mexico and liquefied natural gas exports.
This document provides an overview of the natural gas market in the Northeast United States, including New England, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. It details statistics on gas customers, consumption, infrastructure like pipelines and storage, and production. A key point is that the development of the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania has significantly increased domestic gas production in the region and reduced its reliance on other supply basins and imports.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission responded to each point raised in a draft copy of the PA Auditor General's audit of how Act 13 impact fee money, raised from Marcellus Shale drillers, gets spent by local municipalities. The PUC says it's not their job to monitor how the money gets spent, only in how much is raised and distributed.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
A biased look at how 60% of impact fees raised from PA's shale drilling are spent, by the anti-drilling PA Auditor General. He chose to ignore an audit of 40% of the impact fees, which go to Harrisburg and disappear into the black hole of Harrisburg spending. The Auditor General claims, without basis in fact, that up to 24% of the funds are spent on items not allowed under the Act 13 law.
The final report from the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection that finds, after several years of testing, no elevated levels of radiation from acid mine drainage coming from the Clyde Mine, flowing into Ten Mile Creek. Radical anti-drillers tried to smear the Marcellus industry with false claims of illegal wastewater dumping into the mine, with further claims of elevated radiation levels in the creek. After years of testing, the DEP found those allegations to be false.
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission denied a request to stay the authorization of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's Broad Run Expansion Project. The Commission found that the intervenors requesting the stay did not demonstrate they would suffer irreparable harm if the project proceeded. Specifically, the Commission determined that the environmental impacts to forest and a nearby animal rehabilitation center would be insignificant. Additionally, conditioning authorization on future permits did not improperly encroach on state authority. Therefore, justice did not require granting a stay.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
New PA Rule Adopted for Emergency Response Planning at Unconventional Well Sites
1. 526
RULES AND REGULATIONS
requires the Department and the Pennsylvania Emer-
Title 25—ENVIRONMENTAL gency Management Agency (PEMA) to adopt emergency
regulations directing the operators of all unconventional
PROTECTION wells within this Commonwealth to take certain actions
for emergency response. The final-omitted rulemaking is
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD also adopted under section 1920-A of The Administrative
[ 25 PA. CODE CH. 78 ] Code of 1929 (71 P. S. § 510-20), which authorizes the
Board to adopt regulations necessary for the proper
Emergency Response Planning at Unconventional performance of the work of the Department.
Well Sites
D. Background of the Final-Omitted Rulemaking
The Environmental Quality Board (Board) amends Governor Tom Corbett called the Marcellus Shale natu-
§§ 78.1 and 78.55 (relating to definitions; and control and ral gas play an ‘‘economic cornerstone’’ of this Common-
disposal planning; emergency response for unconventional wealth’s recovery from the recession, which has impacted
well sites) to read as set forth in Annex A. the Nation over the past 4 years. The development of vast
Notice of proposed rulemaking is omitted as provided natural gas resources trapped beneath more than half of
under section 204(3) of the act of July 31, 1968 (P. L. 769, this Commonwealth has created tens of thousands of new
No. 240) (45 P. S. § 1204(3)), known as the Common- jobs, generated billions of dollars in tax and lease rev-
wealth Documents Law (CDL). Section 204(3) of the CDL enues for the Commonwealth and its citizens, infused
provides that an agency may omit notice of proposed billions of additional dollars in bonus lease and royalty
rulemaking if the agency finds for good cause that the payments to landowners and significantly expanded ac-
notice is contrary to the public interest. The proposed cess to clean, affordable energy sources for residential,
rulemaking procedure for this rulemaking is contrary to commercial and industrial customers.
the public interest for the following reasons. Along with the economic and energy independence and
In addition, this is an emergency-certified regulation as security potential of the Marcellus Shale natural gas
provided under section 6(d) of the Regulatory Review Act reserve comes a heightened awareness of and concern for
(71 P. S. § 745.6(d)). Section 745.6(d) of the Regulatory the activity’s impact on local communities within the
Review Act provides for issuance of emergency regula- shale development regions. While this Commonwealth
tions based on, among other things, a certification by the has an extensive history of oil and natural gas develop-
Governor that a final-omitted rulemaking is required to ment, particularly in its western region, natural gas
protect the public health, safety and welfare. In this case, development is relatively new to regions such as the
the Governor issued a Certification of Need for Emer- Northern Tier and northeastern Pennsylvania. Addition-
gency Regulation on December 27, 2012, that this final- ally, the size, scale and accelerated pace of development of
omitted rulemaking is required to protect the public the Marcellus Shale natural gas reserve is a new phe-
health, safety and welfare. In addition, that Certification nomenon for this Commonwealth.
of Need for Emergency Regulation is consistent with the
In 2011, Governor Corbett issued Executive Order
statute authorizing the regulation.
2011-01, codified at 4 Pa. Code Chapter 6, Subchapter II,
This order was adopted by the Board at its meeting of to establish the Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission
November 20, 2012. (Commission). The Governor charged it to identify, priori-
A. Effective Date tize and craft recommendations regarding the safe, effi-
cient and environmentally responsible extraction and use
This final-omitted rulemaking is effective upon publica- of unconventional natural gas reserves in this Common-
tion, with the exception of § 78.55(f)(3)—(5). Section wealth.
78.55(f)(3) will be effective on February 25, 2013. Section
78.55(f)(4) will be on effective July 25, 2013. Section As outlined in Executive Order 2011-01, the Commis-
78.55(f)(5) will be effective on April 26, 2013. sion undertook a broad review of a multitude of issues
regarding Marcellus Shale natural gas development. As
B. Contact Persons part of this, the Commission formed a Local Impact &
For further information contact, Kurt Klapkowski, Di- Emergency Response Work Group (Work Group). The
rector, Bureau of Oil and Gas Planning and Program Work Group closely examined emergency response issues,
Management, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 15th which included meeting with various experts and local
Floor, 400 Market Street, P. O. Box 8765, Harrisburg, PA government officials.
17105-8765, (717) 772-2199; or Douglas Brennan, Direc- In the final Commission report to the Governor, the
tor, Bureau of Regulatory Counsel, Rachel Carson State Commission noted that
Office Building, 9th Floor, 400 Market Street, P. O. Box
8461, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8461, (717) 787-7060. Persons . . . municipalities have a legal responsibility for plan-
with a disability may use the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay ning for and responding to all types of emergencies.
Service, (800) 654-5984 (TDD users) or (800) 654-5988 Drilling activity leads to the potential for many types
(voice users). This final-omitted rulemaking is available of incidents for which response may be necessary
on the Department of Environmental Protection’s (De- including: fires, well blowouts, chemical and fuel
partment) web site at www.dep.state.pa.us. spills, and traffic accidents attributed to an overall
C. Statutory Authority increase in vehicular traffic. Emergencies at drilling
locations have occurred and until emergency special-
This final-omitted rulemaking is being made under the ists retained by drilling companies arrive on site,
authority of act of February 2, 2012 (P. L. 67, No. 9) (Act volunteer fire companies and other local first re-
9), codified at 35 Pa.C.S. § 7321 (relating to unconven- sponders must secure a site and take appropriate
tional well 911 emergency response information), which action. . . . Responding to natural gas incidents re-
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
2. RULES AND REGULATIONS 527
quires additional emergency management planning at are minimized. The plan must utilize the concepts of the
the local, county, and regional levels and appropriate National Incident Management System to the maximum
equipment and training, particularly with respect to extent practicable. The key elements are described in this
natural gas well operations. paragraph. The plan must contain a description of the
The Commission made two recommendations that re- procedure used to provide current information to emer-
late to this final-omitted rulemaking: gency responders in the event of an emergency, including
current Material Safety Data Sheets for materials located
9.3.1: Oil and gas well pads and related facilities at the well site.
should be assigned a 9-1-1 address for emergency
response purposes, and oil and gas operators should Emergency response plans may consist of a base plan
be required to provide GPS coordinates for access common to all of an operator’s well sites, along with
roads and well pad sites, and post this information, site-specific plans for each well site with information
along with appropriate emergency response contact relevant to that site. The initial emergency response plan
information, in a conspicuous manner at the well pad shall be submitted to PEMA, the Department, the county
site. emergency management agency and the Public Safety
Answering Point prior to drilling operations. Updates
9.3.2: In coordination with PEMA and [the Depart- shall be submitted annually. If changes are not needed to
ment], emergency plans for responding to incidents the plan, the operator shall submit a statement to that
on well development sites should be standardized effect.
across the Commonwealth to ensure an acceptable
level of expectation for safety and response coordina- Act 9 explicitly applies to both new and existing
tion. The emergency plan should be distributed to the unconventional wells within this Commonwealth. In rec-
county emergency management coordinator. ognition of that fact, § 78.55(f)(6) contains a transition to
allow for existing operations, and others, to meet the new
On February 2, 2012, Governor Corbett signed into law requirements within a reasonable time period after the
Act 9, which adopted these recommendations from the effective date of the final-omitted rulemaking. The transi-
Commission. Act 9 provides that the Department and tion allows for delayed effective dates for well sites
PEMA ‘‘shall adopt emergency regulations directing the containing a well that is being drilled or has been drilled,
operators of all unconventional wells within this Com- well sites for which a well permit has been issued but
monwealth’’ to register street and GPS addresses, post wells have not started drilling and well sites for which an
signs and develop and implement emergency response administratively complete well permit application is
plans. The Department and PEMA have worked closely in pending.
developing this final-omitted rulemaking.
G. Benefits and Costs
The Department presented this final-omitted rule-
making to its Oil and Gas Technical Advisory Board Benefits
(TAB) at meetings on August 15 and September 17, 2012. The public will benefit from this final-omitted rule-
Changes were made to this final-omitted rulemaking to making because it enhances emergency response at un-
reflect concerns raised by TAB. conventional well sites. This has a direct benefit to public
E. Summary of Final-Omitted Rulemaking health, safety and welfare. This is particularly beneficial
to first responders and employees at the well sites, who
This final-omitted rulemaking adds two definitions to are the people most vulnerable to injury when there is an
§ 78.1 and adds § 78.55(f). The Department is currently emergency.
developing other changes to Chapter 78 (relating to oil
and gas wells) to address a variety of topics, including Local governments will benefit because this final-
changes needed to implement 58 Pa.C.S. §§ 3201—3274 omitted rulemaking will enhance their ability to manage
(relating to development). As part of that effort, the emergency response. They will have emergency response
Department expects that subsection (e) will be integrated plans that meet a Statewide standard in hand when an
into a more comprehensive § 78.55 in the future. emergency occurs. In addition, there will be signs that
meet the same standard to direct their response person-
The new definitions in § 78.1 are for ‘‘unconventional nel to the well site as quickly as possible.
formation’’ and ‘‘unconventional well,’’ which are taken
verbatim from 58 Pa.C.S. § 3203 (relating to definitions). The regulated community will also benefit because
there will be clear and uniform Statewide requirements
Section 78.55(f)(2) contains definitions of terms used in for emergency response planning and the use of signs and
Act 9 and others that are needed to clarify the require- addresses to direct emergency responders to the well site.
ments of the regulation. These definitions only apply to
subsection (f). The definitions include several terms to Costs
ensure clarity of the requirements for signs (‘‘access This final-omitted rulemaking will not impose addi-
road,’’ ‘‘entrance,’’ ‘‘private road’’ and ‘‘public road’’). tional costs on the Department.
Section 78.55(f)(3) requires registration of street ad- Industry will incur costs in preparing the emergency
dresses and GPS coordinate addresses that are needed to response plans and posting signs. However, responsible
assist emergency responders in locating well sites. This operators already do both. Therefore, the expense should
paragraph provides details on how those requirements not be significant. The Department estimates that for
apply in different scenarios. existing unconventional well sites the cost to industry to
Section 78.55(f)(4) contains signage requirements for provide the required signage may run between $250,000
the same purpose. The standards are largely borrowed and $1.1 million, depending on the material used to
from Department of Transportation regulations. An ex- manufacture the sign ($150 per sign for fiberboard and
ample sign is provided in Figure 1. $600 per sign for aluminum).
Compliance assistance plan
Section 78.55(f)(5) contains requirements for emergency
response planning. Emergency response planning is a A compliance assistance plan will be implemented,
central part of ensuring that the impacts of emergencies including regional training sessions by the Department
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
3. 528 RULES AND REGULATIONS
and PEMA on the new requirements. The training will be (c) The Chairperson shall submit this order and Annex
targeted to Department and PEMA staff, local govern- A to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission and
ments, first responders and unconventional well opera- the Senate and House Environmental Resources and
tors. Energy committees as required by the Regulatory Review
Paperwork requirements Act.
This final-omitted rulemaking will require operators to (d) The Chairperson of the Board shall certify this
prepare written emergency response plans. They will also order and Annex A and deposit them with the Legislative
need to submit annual updates, although for the vast Reference Bureau, as required by law.
majority of well sites this will simply involve notification (e) This order shall take effect immediately, with the
that the plans are still current. exception of § 78.55(f)(3)—(5). Section 78.55(f)(3) shall
H. Sunset Review take effect February 25, 2013. Section 78.55(f)(4) shall
take effect July 25, 2013. Section 78.55(f)(5) shall take
These regulations will be reviewed in accordance with effect April 26, 2013.
the sunset review schedule published by the Department
to determine whether the regulations effectively fulfill the MICHAEL L. KRANCER,
goals for which they were intended. Chairperson
I. Regulatory Review Fiscal Note: 7-479. No fiscal impact; (8) recommends
adoption.
Under section 5.1(c) of the Regulatory Review Act (71
P. S. § 745.5a(c)), on November 29, 2012, the Department PENNSYLVANIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
submitted a copy of the final-omitted rulemaking and a AGENCY
copy of a Regulatory Analysis Form to the Independent Certification
Regulatory Review Commission and to the Chairpersons
of the House and Senate Environmental Resources and As Director of the Pennsylvania Emergency Manage-
Energy Committees. On the same date, the regulations ment Agency (PEMA), I fully endorse the regulation
were submitted to the Office of Attorney General for entitled ‘‘Emergency Response Planning at Unconven-
review and approval under the Commonwealth Attorneys tional Well Sites,’’ amending 25 Pa. Code 78, which was
Act (71 P. S. §§ 732-101—732-506). approved by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on
November 20, 2012. I attended the EQB meeting and
J. Findings jointly presented the regulation to the EQB along with
The Board finds that: Scott Perry, the Deputy Secretary for Oil and Gas Man-
(1) Use of the final-omitted rulemaking procedure is agement at the Department of Environmental Protection
appropriate because the proposed rulemaking procedure (DEP).
specified in sections 201 and 202 of the CDL (45 P. S. I am aware of the statutory provision authorizing the
§§ 1201 and 1202) is, under the circumstances, contrary regulation, contained in the Act of February 2, 2012, P. L.
to the public interest. 67, Act 9 (Act 9), which provides that ‘‘[PEMA] and the
(2) Use of proposed rulemaking procedures is contrary Department of Environmental Protection shall adopt
to the public interest because the subject of the regula- emergency regulations’’ such as the regulation approved
tions, emergency response, has a direct and immediate by the EQB on November 20, 2012. PEMA and DEP
impact on human health and safety at unconventional worked together in concert to develop the regulation. I
well sites. agree that the EQB should adopt the regulation because
DEP inspectors will be responsible to enforce the well site
(3) Use of the emergency certified rulemaking proce- requirements of the regulation.
dure provided in section 6(d) of the Regulatory Review
Act is appropriate because it is required to protect the November 29, 2012
public health, safety and welfare. GLENN M. CANNON, Esq.,
(4) Use of the emergency certified rulemaking proce- Director
dure is required to protect the public health, safety and GOVERNOR’S OFFICE
welfare based on the Governor’s Certification of Need for
Emergency Regulation dated December 27, 2012. This is Certification of Need for Emergency Regulation
also indicated by the underlying statute in which the Whereas, the Commonwealth Department of Environ-
General Assembly directed the Department and PEMA to mental Protection engages in the permitting, regulation
issue an emergency regulation containing the explicit and inspection of all unconventional well sites within this
provisions in the regulations. Commonwealth; and
(5) The regulations are necessary and appropriate for Whereas, the Commonwealth Department of Environ-
administration of the authorizing acts identified in Sec- mental Protection, the Pennsylvania Emergency Manage-
tion C of this preamble and in the public interest. ment Agency and local political subdivisions engage in
K. Order emergency response activities at unconventional well
The Board, acting under the authorizing statutes, sites; and
orders that: Whereas, timely emergency response is fundamental to
(a) The regulations of the Department, 25 Pa. Code the safety of the public, unconventional well site employ-
Chapter 78, are amended by amending §§ 78.1 and 78.55 ees, and emergency responders as well as to the protec-
to read as set forth in Annex A, with ellipses referring to tion of the environmental resources throughout Pennsyl-
the existing text of the regulations. vania; and
(b) The Chairperson shall submit this order and Annex Whereas, local first responders and emergency manage-
A to the Office of General Counsel and the Office of ment officials have cited concerns that it may be difficult
Attorney General for approval and review as to legality to find unconventional well sites should an emergency
and form as required by law. occur particularly in the vast, undeveloped regions of the
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
4. RULES AND REGULATIONS 529
Commonwealth and that unconventional well site activi- (b) The following words and terms, when used in this
ties may pose unforeseen risks and hazards to response chapter, have the following meanings, unless the context
efforts; and clearly indicates otherwise, or as otherwise provided in
Whereas, many unconventional well sites lack adequate this chapter:
addressing and signage, which has the potential to delay * * * * *
emergency response, threatening the public, unconven-
tional well site employees, and emergency responders in Tour—A workshift in drilling of a well.
the event of an emergency; and Unconventional formation—A geological shale formation
Whereas, no existing regulations of the Department of existing below the base of the Elk Sandstone or its
Environmental Protection or the Pennsylvania Emergency geologic equivalent stratigraphic interval where natural
Management Agency require that unconventional well gas generally cannot be produced at economic flow rates
operators report their latitude and longitude or street or in economic volumes except by vertical or horizontal
address to the Department of Environmental Protection, well bores stimulated by hydraulic fracture treatments or
the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency or by using multilateral well bores or other techniques to
local county Emergency Management Agencies; and expose more of the formation to the well bore.
Whereas, the Act of February 2, 2012, P. L. 67, No. 9 Unconventional well—A bore hole drilled or being
requires the Department of Environmental Protection and drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production
the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency to of natural gas from an unconventional formation.
adopt emergency regulations related to the emergency Vertical well—A well with a single vertical well bore.
response at all unconventional well sites across this
Commonwealth; and * * * * *
Whereas, without immediate amendment of the regula- Subchapter C. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
tions, emergency response activities may be severely PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
hampered to the detriment of the safety of the public, § 78.55. Control and disposal planning; emergency
unconventional well site workers, and emergency re- response for unconventional well sites.
sponders, and to the protection of the environmental
resources of the Commonwealth; and (a) Preparation and implementation of plan. Prior to
generation of waste, the well operator shall prepare and
Now Therefore, I do hereby certify that the regulatory implement a plan under § 91.34 (relating to activities
amendments to 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 78, following hereto utilizing pollutants) for the control and disposal of fluids,
as ANNEX A are required to meet the emergency condi- residual waste and drill cuttings, including tophole water,
tions enumerated in the recitals above and to safeguard brines, drilling fluids, additives, drilling muds, stimula-
the public health, safety and welfare as described therein. tion fluids, well servicing fluids, oil, production fluids and
Further, I hereby authorize the Secretary of the Depart- drill cuttings from the drilling, alteration, production,
ment of Environmental Protection to publish these plugging or other activity associated with oil and gas
amendments in the Pennsylvania Bulletin as an Emer- wells.
gency Final-Omitted Rulemaking consistent with the (b) Requirements. The plan must identify the control
provisions of Section 6(d) of the Regulatory Review Act, as and disposal methods and practices utilized by the well
amended, 71 P. S. § 745.6(d). operator and be consistent with the act, The Clean
Given under my hand and the Seal of the Governor, at Streams Law (35 P. S. §§ 691.1—691.1001), the Solid
the City of Harrisburg, on this 27th day of December in Waste Management Act (35 P. S. §§ 6018.101—6018.1003)
the year of our Lord two thousand and twelve, and of the and §§ 78.54, 78.56—78.58 and 78.60—78.63. The plan
Commonwealth the two hundred and thirty seventh. must also include a pressure barrier policy that identifies
barriers to be used during identified operations.
(c) Revisions. The operator shall revise the plan prior
to implementing a change to the practices identified in
the plan.
(d) Copies. A copy of the plan shall be provided to the
Department upon request and shall be available at the
Governor well site during drilling and completion activities for
review.
Annex A
(e) Emergency contacts. A list of emergency contact
TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION phone numbers for the area in which the well site is
located must be included in the plan and be prominently
PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL displayed at the well site during drilling, completion or
PROTECTION alteration activities.
Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL (f) Emergency response for unconventional well sites.
RESOURCES
(1) Applicability. This subsection applies to unconven-
ARTICLE I. LAND RESOURCES tional wells.
CHAPTER 78. OIL AND GAS WELLS (2) Definitions. For the purposes of this subsection, the
following definitions apply:
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Access road—A road connecting a well site to the
§ 78.1. Definitions. nearest public road, private named road, administrative
road with a name and address range, or private unnamed
* * * * * road with an address range.
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
5. 530 RULES AND REGULATIONS
Address—A location, by reference to a road or a land- (iv) When there is a change of well site address, the
mark, made by a county or municipality responsible for operator shall register the new address as provided in
assigning addresses within its jurisdiction. subparagraph (iii).
Administrative road—A road owned and maintained by (v) When there is a change of the entrance due to a
the Commonwealth open to the public at the discretion of change in the well site address or otherwise, the operator
the Commonwealth that may or may not have a name shall register the GPS coordinates for the entrance as
and address range. provided in subparagraph (iii).
Emergency responder—Police, firefighters, emergency (vi) The following shall be retained at the well site for
medical technicians, paramedics, emergency management reference when contacting emergency responders:
personnel, public health personnel, State certified hazard- (A) The well site name.
ous materials response teams, Department emergency
personnel and other personnel authorized in the course of (B) The well site address.
their occupations or duties, or as an authorized volunteer, (C) The GPS coordinates for the entrance and the well
to respond to an emergency. site.
Entrance—The point where the access road to a well (4) Signage.
site connects to the nearest public road, private named
road, administrative road with a name and address (i) Prior to construction of the access road, the operator
range, or a private unnamed road with an address range. of an unconventional well shall display a reflective sign at
the entrance.
GPS coordinates—The coordinates in latitude and lon-
gitude as expressed in degrees decimal to at least six (ii) The sign must meet the following requirements:
digits after the decimal point based upon the World (A) The sign must be fabricated with approved
Geodetic System 1984 Datum or any other datum ap- retroreflective sheeting material meeting ASTM 4956
proved by the Department. Type III.
PEMA—The Pennsylvania Emergency Management (B) The sign must have a white background with a
Agency. 2-inch red border and black numbers and letters. Signs
Private named road—A private road with a name and for entrances on administrative roads may use other
address range. colors provided that the signs use contrasting colors
between the background, border, numbers and letters.
Private road—A road that is not a public road.
(C) The sign must be of sufficient size to accommodate
Private unnamed road—A private road that is not a the required information described in this section. The
private named road. minimum size of a sign must be 36 inches in height and
Public road—A road owned and maintained by the 48 inches in width.
Commonwealth, a county within this Commonwealth, a (D) The sign must follow the format of Figure 1 and
municipality within the Commonwealth or any combina- contain:
tion thereof that is open to the public.
(I) The address number for the well site displayed
Public safety answering point—An entity operating in horizontally on the first line of the sign in text no smaller
cooperation with local municipalities and counties to than 4 inches in height.
receive 9-1-1 calls for a defined geographic area and
process calls according to a specific operational policy. (II) The full address of the entrance, including the
county and municipality in which the entrance is located.
Well site name—The name used to designate the well
site by the operator on the well permit application (III) The well operator’s company name.
submitted to the Department. (IV) The 24-hour contact telephone information for the
(3) Registration of addresses. operator of the well site.
(i) Prior to construction of an access road to a well site, (V) The GPS coordinates for the entrance.
the operator of an unconventional well shall request a (VI) The well site name.
street address for the well site from the county or
municipality responsible for assigning street addresses. (VII) The wording ‘‘In Case of Emergency Call 9-1-1.’’
(ii) The operator shall determine the GPS coordinates (iii) The sign must be mounted independently from
for both the well site and the entrance to the well site. other signage.
The GPS coordinates must have a horizontal accuracy of (iv) The bottom of the sign must be positioned a
plus or minus 6.67 feet or better. If there is more than minimum of 3 feet above ground level.
one well on a well site, one set of GPS coordinates must
be used for the well site. (v) The sign may not contain other markings.
(iii) The operator shall register the following with (vi) A sign, as viewed from the applicable road, may
PEMA, the Department, the Public Safety Answering not be obstructed from view by vegetation, equipment,
Point and the county emergency management organiza- vehicles or other obstruction.
tion within the county where the well site is located: (vii) During drilling operations, the American Petro-
(A) The well site name. leum Institute (API) permit numbers of the wells at the
site may be posted on a nonreflective sign below the
(B) The well site address. principal sign. The API sign may be removed after the
(C) The GPS coordinates for the entrance and the well well is completed, provided that it is not otherwise
site. required to be posted.
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
6. RULES AND REGULATIONS 531
Figure 1. Sample Site Entrance Signage
(Not to scale)
(5) Emergency response planning. (D) A description of the procedure to be used to provide
(i) The operator of an unconventional well shall develop the most current information to emergency responders in
and implement an emergency response plan that provides the event of an emergency, including the following:
for equipment, procedures, training and documentation to (I) The current Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
properly respond to emergencies that threaten human required under law to be present at the well site.
health and safety for each well site. The plan shall
incorporate National Incident Management System plan- (II) The location of the MSDSs at the well site.
ning standards, including the use of the Incident Com-
mand System, Incident Action Planning and Common (III) The name of the position in the operator’s organi-
Communications Plans. The plan must include: zation responsible for providing the information in
subclauses (I) and (II).
(A) The emergency contact information, including
phone numbers, for the well operator’s local representa- (E) A list containing the location of any fire suppres-
tive for the well site and the well operator’s 24-hour sion and spill control equipment maintained by the well
emergency phone number. operator at the well site.
(B) The emergency notification procedures that the (F) A description of any emergency equipment available
operator shall utilize to contact emergency responders to the operator that is located off of the well site.
during an emergency.
(G) A summary of the risks and hazards to the public
(C) A description of the well site personnel’s response within 1/2 mile of the well site and the associated
to the following well site emergencies: planning assumptions.
(I) Fire.
(H) An outline of the emergency response training plan
(II) Medical emergency. that the operator has established.
(III) Explosion or similar event.
(ii) The emergency response plan in subparagraph (i)
(IV) Spill. may consist of two parts:
(V) Security breach or other security event. (A) A base plan common to all of the operator’s well
(VI) Any other incident that necessitates the presence sites containing some of the elements described in sub-
of emergency responders. paragraph (i).
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013
7. 532 RULES AND REGULATIONS
(B) A site-specific plan containing the remaining ele-
ments described in subparagraph (i). Title 61—REVENUE
(iii) The operator shall submit a copy of the current DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
emergency response plan for that well site unless the [ 61 PA. CODE CHS. 7 AND 901 ]
permit provides otherwise. For plans using the approach Board of Appeals; Small Games of Chance
in subparagraph (ii), the operator may submit one base
plan provided that the site-specific plans are submitted The Department of Revenue (Department), under au-
for each well site. thority in section 6 of The Fiscal Code (72 P. S. § 6) and
section 306 of the Local Option Small Games of Chance
(iv) The operator shall review the plan and submit an Act (10 P. S. § 328.306), amends Chapters 7 and 901
update annually on or before March 1 each year. In the (relating to Board of Appeals; and local option small
event that updates are not made to the plan for that games of chance).
review period, the operator shall submit a statement
indicating the review was completed and updates to the Purpose of Final-Form Rulemaking
plan were not necessary. This final-form rulemaking consolidates administrative
appeals under the jurisdiction of the Department’s Board
(v) The plan and subsequent updates shall be submit- of Appeals (Board). Additionally, the final-form rule-
ted to: making streamlines the administrative appeals process by
(A) PEMA. creating a uniform set of procedures for administrative
appeals within the Department. The final-form rule-
(B) The Department. making preserves the Board’s jurisdiction over tax ap-
peals.
(C) The county emergency management agency. Explanation of Regulatory Requirements
(D) The Public Safety Answering Point with jurisdic- Sections 7.1—7.7 are rescinded.
tion over the well site.
Section 7.11 (relating to definitions) contains definitions
(vi) A copy of the plan shall be available at the well of ‘‘administrative proceeding,’’ ‘‘appeal’’ and ‘‘Board,’’
site during all phases of operation. which were previously defined in § 7.1.
Section 7.12 (relating to jurisdiction) explains that the
(vii) The emergency response plan must address re- Board’s jurisdiction includes appeals and administrative
sponse actions for the following stages of operation at the proceedings as defined in § 7.11.
well site:
Section 7.13 (relating to manner of proceeding before
(A) Preparation of the access road and well site. the Board) explains that proceedings before the Board are
initiated by the filing of a petition.
(B) Drilling of the well.
Section 7.14 (relating to petitions) contains the text
(C) Hydraulic fracturing and stimulation of the well. formerly in § 7.3 with some minor modifications ex-
plained as follows.
(D) Production.
Subsection (a) contains language in former § 7.3(a)
(E) Well site restoration. stating that petitions should be filed with the Board.
(F) Plugging of the well. Subsection (b) is an expansion of former § 7.3(a) re-
garding the time limits for filing a petition.
(viii) The requirements in subparagraphs (i)—(vii) may Subsection (c) is an expansion of former § 7.3(a) re-
be met by implementing guidance issued by the Depart- garding receipt of a petition.
ment in coordination with PEMA.
Subsection (d) is language that was formerly in § 7.3(b)
(6) Transition. and is expanded to include electronically filed petitions.
(i) This subsection is effective January 26, 2013, except Subsection (e) contains language in former § 7.3(b)(1).
as provided in subparagraph (ii). This subsection explains the general requirements and
contents of a petition and also additional requirements for
(ii) For a well site containing a well that is being an appeal petition.
drilled or has been drilled as of January 26, 2013, or a
well site for which a well permit has been issued but Subsection (f) contains language that was in former
wells have not started drilling as of January 26, 2013, or § 7.3(c). It has been revised to explain the process of
a well site for which an administratively complete appli- docketing petitions.
cation is pending as of January 26, 2013, as provided in Subsection (g) contains language in former
subparagraph (i), the following applies: § 7.3(b)(1)(ix) regarding additional information.
(A) Paragraph (3) is effective on February 25, 2013. Subsection (h) is new language and includes electronic
signatures.
(B) Paragraph (4) is effective on July 25, 2013.
Section 7.15 (relating to Board practice and procedure)
(C) Paragraph (5) is effective on April 26, 2013. contains the language in former § 7.5 with minor modifi-
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 13-132. Filed for public inspection January 25, 2013, 9:00 a.m.] cations explained as follows.
Subsection (a)(1), which explains the burden of proof
before the Board, is identical to former § 7.5(c)(2).
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 43, NO. 4, JANUARY 26, 2013