4. NSCLC as
one
disease
Squamous
34%
Other
11%
Adenoca
55%
NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER: NOT
ONE DISEASE, BUT MANY!
Then Histology-Based Subtyping Now
Adenocarcinoma
KRAS
25%
ALK
7%
EGFR
Sensitizing
17%
No Known
Oncogenic Driver
Detected
31%
EGFR Other 4%
MET 3%
> 1 Mutation 3%
HER2 2%
ROS1 2%
BRAF 2%
RET 2%
NTRK < 1%
PIK3CA 1%
MEK1 < 1%
5. CAN WE FURTHER CLASSIFY NSCLC BY
PROTEIN TARGETS?
.
Histology-Based Subtyping
All NSCLC
PD-L1+
Protein Subtyping
Adenocarcinoma
KRAS
25%
ALK
7%
EGFR
Sensitizing
17%
No Known
Oncogenic Driver
Detected
31%
EGFR Other 4%
MET 3%
> 1 Mutation 3%
HER2 2%
ROS1 2%
BRAF 2%
RET 2%
NTRK < 1%
PIK3CA 1%
MEK1 < 1%
+
??
AND
MET+
TROP-2+
??
??
??
??
PTK7+
CEA-CAM+
HER2+
??
??
??
??
??
6. ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES IN NSCLC:
LIKE IT OR NOT, THEY’RE COMING FOR YOU
Immunotherapy
Chemotherapy
Targeted therapy
Antibody-drug conjugates
9. DRUG-RELATED COMPONENTS OF ANTIBODY
DRUG CONJUGATES
Payload:
‒ DAR (drug antibody ratio): mean ratio of cytotoxic drug/Ab
‒ Topo I inhibitors, MMAE derivatives (microtubule interference), other cytotoxics,
other active moieties
Antibody Epitope: associated ‘extras’
‒ Signaling interference via ligand blocking, dimerization interference, internalization,
and degradation
‒ ADCC
Linker: primarily influences circulating free-drug vs release in cells
.
10. PATIENT-RELATED VARIABLES RELEVANT TO
ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES
Epitope expression level in tumor vs other tissues[1]
Prior/current therapy influencing resistance/uptake[2]
Biology of cancer influences:
‒ Impact of any signaling interference (ie, addicted or not to epitope-related
pathway)
‒ Stability of epitope expression (eg, due to addiction, surface half-life, etc)
‒ Sensitivity of cancer cell to payload[3]
.
13. ADC IN LUNG CANCER
HER2/ERBB2
‒ Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)*
‒ Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd)*
HER3
‒ Patritumab deruxtecan
Trop-2
‒ Datopotamab deruxtecan (DS-1062a)
‒ Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132)*
c-MET
‒ Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V, ABBV-
399)
CEACAM5 - SAR408701
Axl - Enapotamab Vedotin (EnaV)
‒ PTK7 - Cofetuzumab pelidotin (ABBV-
647, PF-06647020)
‒ NaPi2b – lifastuzumab vedotin
‒ Nectin-4 – enfortumab vedotin* (no
data in NSCLC available)
*FDA approved in other cancer types (breast, gastric/GEJ, urothelial)
14.
15. ADO-TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE (T-DM1) FOR
PATIENTS WITH HER2 AMPLIFIED OR MUTANT
LUNG CANCERS
Phase II basket trial to evaluate
HER2-targeted antibody-drug
conjugate, ado-trastuzumab
emtansine, in patients with HER2-
mutant lung cancers (N = 18)[1,2]
‒ Patients with MET positive
resistance to prior treatments
‒ ≤ 4 prior lines of therapy; 50% of
patients had prior HER2 directed
therapy (TKI or mAb)
1. Li. JCO. 2018;36:2532. 2. NCT02675829.
Trastuzumab
(HER2-targeted
mAb)
Cytotoxic agent:
DM1
Thioether linker
16. ADO-TRASTUZUMAB-EMTANSINE (T-DM1) IN
HER2-MUTANT LUNG CANCERS
Primary endpoint:
ORR per RECIST v1.1
‒ ORR: 44% (95% CI:
22-69)
‒ Median PFS: 5 mos
(95% CI: 3-9)
1. Li. JCO. 2018;36:2532.
-100
-75
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
Patients
-30%
Best
Response
per
RECIST
v1.1
(%)
Confirmed partial response
Stable disease
Progressive disease
17. ADO-TRASTUZUMAB-EMTANSINE (T-DM1) IN NSCLC:
PATIENT HER2 BIOMARKER ASSESSMENT
IHC expression or protein analysis did not predict response; 2 patients with HER2
amplification had PR/SD
NGS Result
FISH,
(HER2/CEP17
ratio)
IHC
Result
Mass
Spectometry
(amol/µg)
PR
(Yes or No)
Exon 20 p.A775_G776insYVMA 1.1 (2.7/2.5) 0 NA y
Exon 20 p.A775_G776insYVMA 1.8 (8.1/4.5) 2+ 642 N
Exon 20 p.A775_G776insYVMA NA NA NA N
Exon 20 p.A775_G776insYVMA 1.4 (4.5/3.3) 1+ 586 Y
Exon 20 p.A775_G776insYVMA 1.9 (5.6/2.9) 1+ 548 Y
Exon 20 p.G778_P780dup 1.6 (7.6/4.8) 1+ 0 N
Exon 20 p.G778_P780dup 1.8 (4.6/2.5) 2+ 507 Y
Exon 20 p.G778_P780dup 1.4 (5.8/4.2) 2+ NA N
Exon 20 p.G778-779 insCPG 1.6 (4.3/2.7) 0 NA N
NGS Result
FISH,
(HER2/CEP17
ratio)
IHC
Result
Mass
Spectometry
(amol/µg)
PR
(Yes or No)
Exon 20
p.G776_V777.VCV
NA NA NA Y
Exon 20
p.G776delinsVC
1.6 (5.7/3.6) 0 205 Y
Exon 19 p.L755P 1.5 (3.2/2.1) 2+ 434 N
Exon 19 p.L755P NA 0 NA N
Exon 17 p.V659E 1.2 (2.4/2.0) 2+ NA N
Exon 17 p.V659E 1.1 (2.3/2.0) 2+ 688 Y
Exon 8 p.S310F,
amplification fold
change 2.8
4.1 (8.4/2.5) 2+ 1495 Y
Exon 8 p.S310F 1.8 (3.2/1.8) 0 0 N
Exon 8 p.S335C 2.4 (4.8/2.0) 2+ 902 N
18. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd)
NSCLC
Deruxtecan
Humanized anti-HER2 mAb, same
amino acid sequence as trastuzumab
Tetrapeptide-based
cleavable linker
Membrane-permeable payload:
Topoisomerase I inhibitor,
an exatecan derivative
18
19. HER2-TARGETED ADC: TRASTUZUMAB
DERUXTECAN (T-DXD)
High drug:antibody
ratio: ~ 8
Stable linker-payload
Tumor-selectable
cleavable linker
High potency,
membrane-permeable
payload with short
systemic half-life
Bystander killing effect
.
Humanized anti-HER2 IgG1 mAb
with same AA sequence as
trastuzumab
Tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker
Cysteine residue
Drug/linker
Topoisomerase I inhibitor (DXd) payload
(exatecan derivative)
HO
O
F
NH
O
O
O
N
N
OH
OH
H
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
N
N
H
N
H
N
H
N
N
N
F
H
N
Cys
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29. H
N
PATRITUMAB DERUXTECAN (U3-1402):
NOVEL HER3-TARGETED ANTIBODY–DRUG
CONJUGATE
.
Patritumab (HER3 antibody)
Conjugation chemistry
Linked to cysteine residues of the antibody
Cysteine residue
Drug linker
Payload (DXd)
Exatecan derivative
N
H
N
Drug linker
O
O
O
Intracellular enzyme
N
H
O
O
H
N
O
O
N
H O F
O
O
OH
O
O
O
HO
NH
OH
H
N
F
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35. Sacituzumab Govitecan (IMMU-132): Trop-2–Targeted
Antibody–Drug Conjugate
Bystander effect: In acidic tumor microenvironment, SN-38
is released from anti–Trop-2 antibody, diffuses into
neighboring Trop-2–negative cells
Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Khoury. ASCO 2019. Abstr e14651. Bardia. JCO. 2017;35:2141.
Humanized RS7 Antibody
Targets Trop-2, an antigen expressed in many
epithelial cancers, including mTNBC (88%)
Antibody type: h-IgG1
SN-38 Payload
Targets 136-fold more
than parent compound
irinotecan
Unique chemistry
improves solubility,
selectively delivers
SN-38 to tumor
Irinotecan (Topoisomerase Inhibitor)
Linker for SN-38
High drug-to-
antibody ratio (7.6:1)
pH-sensitive linker
for rapid release of
payload at or inside
tumor
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
HO
N
N
H
N
H
N N
N
N
H
Lys-N CH2O
(1)
S Anti-Trop-2 IgG
SN-38
[ ]7
N
O
O
OH
O
N
N
O
(1)
O
N
N
(2)
Irinotecan
SN-38
36. Targeting Trop-2: Sacituzumab Govitecan in Previously Treated
Metastatic NSCLC
Single-arm, multicenter trial of (N = 47)
‒ Median no. prior therapies: 3 (range: 2–7)
Sacituzumab govitecan dosing: 8 or
10 mg/kg i.v. on Days 1 and 8 of 21-
day cycles
ORR: 19%
Median DoR: 6 months
Median PFS: 5.2 months
Median OS: 9.5 months
> 90% of tumor specimens were
highly positive for Trop-2, but
expression did not predict response
Heist. JCO. 2017;35:2790. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Best
Change
in
Target
Lesions
from
BL
(%)
0
20
40
-20
-40
-60
-80
PR
SD
Progression
Squamous cell histology
8 mg/kg starting dose
Prior checkpoint inhibitor Tx
Early CT assessment after 2 doses
37.
38. H
N
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (DS-1062; Dato-DXd):
TROP2 Antibody–Drug Conjugate
Heist. WCLC 2019. Abstract 3854.
Datopotamab (TROP2 antibody)
Conjugation chemistry
Linked to cysteine residues of the antibody
Cysteine residue
Drug linker
Payload (DXd)
Exatecan derivative
N
H
N
Drug linker
O
O
O
Intracellular enzyme
N
H
O
O
H
N
O
O
N
H O F
O
O
OH
O
O
O
HO
NH
OH
H
N
F
39. Median PFS, mos (95 % CI):
‒ 4 mg/kg: 4.3 mos (2.0-NE); 6 mg/kg: 8.2 mos
(1.5-11.8); 8 mg/kg: 5.4 mos (4.1-7.1)
TROPION-PanTumor01 Phase I Trial: Updated Results
with Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Advanced NSCLC
Change in Sum of Diameters for Target Lesions (BICR)
Overall
Response
(BICR)
Dato-DXd Dose
4
mg/kg
6
m/kg
8
mg/kg
Evaluable
pts, n
40 39 80
Confirmed
CR/PR, n
7 6 19
CR/PR*, n 2 2 1
ORR, n (%) 9 (23) 8 (21) 20 (25)
DCR, n (%)
29
(73)
26 (67) 64 (80)
PD, n (%) 6 (15) 8 (21) 7 (9)
*CR/PR too early for confirmation.
Best Change in Sum of Diameters
80
60
40
50
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
Dato-DXd dose
4 mg/kg
6 mg/kg
8 mg/kg
Best
percent
change
in
SoD
from
baseline,
%
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 84
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Best
percent
change
in
SoD,
%
4 mg/kg
Weeks
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 72
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
6 mg/kg
Weeks
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
8 mg/kg
Weeks
40.
41. Targeting c-MET: Telisotuzumab Vedotin (ABBV-399) in
Advanced Solid Tumors
First-in-human phase I dose
escalation/expansion study (N = 48)
All patients required to be c-MET
positive (Met CONFIRM H score ≥ 150;
60% positive rate)
Median PFS: 5.7 months
Response, n (%)
All Patients*
(N = 48)
c-MET-Pos*
NSCLC (n = 16)
CR 0 0
PR 3 (6.3) 3 (18.8)
SD 22 (45.8) 6 (37.5)
DCR (PR + SD) 25 (52.1) 9 (56.3)
PD 20 (41.7) 5 (31.1)
*Patients treated at all dose levels.
.
Membrane c-Met H score
Best response
PR: Nonsquamous/squamous NSCLC
SD: Nonsquamous/squamous NSCLC
PD: Nonsquamous/squamous NSCLC
† § ¶
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
#
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Membrane
c-Met
H-Score
Change
in
Target
Lesions
From
Baseline
(%)
42. Targeting c-MET: Telisotuzumab Vedotin (ABBV-399) in c-MET+
Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer
Lung-MAP S1400K: Single-arm phase II study (N = 23)
‒ Enrollment required positive H score ≥ 150 by SP44 assay
ORR: 9% in checkpoint
inhibitor naive
mOS: 5.6 months
mPFS: 2.4 months
Waqar. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020; [Epub].
ICI Naive
ICI Refractory
Inadequate Assessment
Symptomatic Deterioration
New Lesions
Unequivocal Progression
IA
SD
NL
UP
Best
Percentage
Change
from
Baseline
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
IA SD SDIA/NLNL NL NL NL
NL
UP
45. TAKE HOME POINTS
A variety of ADCs against different epitopes with different linkers are being
developed
Some require prescreening for gene mutations or protein expression, while
others are currently “unselected”
Adverse events commonly include nausea/vomiting, cytopenias, and
neuropathy depending on payload, and variable pneumonitis/ILD variable
These agents combine the advantages of both targeted therapy plus cytotoxic
chemotherapy
46. The way to get
started is to quit talking
and begin doing.
Walt Disney
Presentation title 20XX 46
47. THANK YOU!
DR. R. RAJKUMAR D.M.
Phone
9677722024
Email
drraj12319@gmail.com