This document is a lawsuit filed by Mark Halburn against multiple individuals and organizations. It alleges conspiracy, defamation of character, intentional infliction of emotional distress, deception of the court, and violation of civil rights related to a domestic violence protection order filed against Halburn in 2017. The document makes numerous allegations of lies and false statements in the protection order and related hearings. It requests injunctive relief including expungement of the protection order, makeup parenting time, damages exceeding $100 trillion, transfer of custody of Halburn's son to him, and other remedies.
Forensic Psychiatric Mental Evaluation - Mark Vance Halburn 07c-198Putnam Reporter
An exhibit included in a Motion to Dismiss in the case of Dolores Halburn and Mark Halburn v. The City of Hurricane, Ben Newhouse, Cleveland Construction, and Kanawha Stone Co.
This is not a protected medical record.
It is a report from a court ordered examination.
It is part of the public record in Putnam County WV case #07c-198
Dr. randell alexander crosses the line against dr plunkettAlison Stevens
This document summarizes a court case in which Lexter Caban was convicted of first-degree felony murder and aggravated child abuse for the death of his girlfriend's two-year-old son, Jonathan. Caban appealed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the improper impeachment of his expert witness, Dr. Plunkett, by the State's expert witnesses. The court heard testimony from multiple expert witnesses on both sides regarding the cause of Jonathan's injuries and death. Caban claims the State's experts improperly attacked Dr. Plunkett's credibility and referenced inadmissible hearsay opinions.
Motion for Summary Judgment by Kanawha Stone containing the deposition and re...Putnam Reporter
Motion For Summary Judgment with exhibit containing the depositions and resumes of the plaintiffs in the case of :
DOLORES HALBURN and MARK HALBURN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF HURRICANE, WEST VIRGINIA,
a municipal corporation, BEN NEWHOUSE,
individually and in his capacity as City Manager
for the City of Hurricane, CLEVELAND
CONSTRUCTION, INC. dba Cleveland
Construction, Inc. Of Nevada, and KANAWHA
STONE COMPANY, INC.,
Defendants.
Putnam County WV Civil Action No. 07-C-298
American football is the most popular sport in the United States at all levels of play. It originated from rugby and soccer and has evolved into the game known today through the contributions of Walter Camp in the late 1800s. The National Football League is the premier professional American football league comprised of 32 teams. The Super Bowl is the championship game of the NFL and is one of the most watched annual sporting events.
This document summarizes several theories of social and emotional development in children and adolescents. It discusses Erikson's psychosocial stages of development, Bandura's social learning theory, and Goleman's theory of emotional intelligence. It also covers theories of moral development from Kohlberg, Turiel, and Gilligan. Factors like parenting styles, role models, peer groups, and their influences on identity formation and socialization are described. Exceptional development in gifted children and juvenile delinquents is also addressed.
This document is a motion filed by attorney R. Scott Joye requesting that the court schedule a hearing for his previously filed motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant G. Ben Thompson. The motion was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in the case of Howard K. Stern v. Stancil Shelley et al. on December 8, 2009 in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina.
This document provides an overview of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. It discusses the history and relationship between Section 504 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Key aspects of Section 504 covered include eligibility, qualifications for being considered disabled, protections from discrimination and harassment, and best practices for school procedures including evaluations, accommodation plans, and periodic reviews. The resources aim to help schools understand and comply with their legal obligations to students with disabilities under Section 504.
Erik Erikson was a German-born American psychologist known for his theory of psychosocial development across the human lifespan. His theory describes 8 stages from infancy to late adulthood, where individuals face conflicts that help develop their ego identity and sense of self. The 8 stages are: trust vs. mistrust (infancy), autonomy vs. shame (early childhood), initiative vs. guilt (preschool), industry vs. inferiority (school age), identity vs. role confusion (adolescence), intimacy vs. isolation (young adulthood), generativity vs. stagnation (middle adulthood), and ego integrity vs. despair (late adulthood). How individuals navigate these conflicts influences their development and psychological well-being
Forensic Psychiatric Mental Evaluation - Mark Vance Halburn 07c-198Putnam Reporter
An exhibit included in a Motion to Dismiss in the case of Dolores Halburn and Mark Halburn v. The City of Hurricane, Ben Newhouse, Cleveland Construction, and Kanawha Stone Co.
This is not a protected medical record.
It is a report from a court ordered examination.
It is part of the public record in Putnam County WV case #07c-198
Dr. randell alexander crosses the line against dr plunkettAlison Stevens
This document summarizes a court case in which Lexter Caban was convicted of first-degree felony murder and aggravated child abuse for the death of his girlfriend's two-year-old son, Jonathan. Caban appealed the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the improper impeachment of his expert witness, Dr. Plunkett, by the State's expert witnesses. The court heard testimony from multiple expert witnesses on both sides regarding the cause of Jonathan's injuries and death. Caban claims the State's experts improperly attacked Dr. Plunkett's credibility and referenced inadmissible hearsay opinions.
Motion for Summary Judgment by Kanawha Stone containing the deposition and re...Putnam Reporter
Motion For Summary Judgment with exhibit containing the depositions and resumes of the plaintiffs in the case of :
DOLORES HALBURN and MARK HALBURN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF HURRICANE, WEST VIRGINIA,
a municipal corporation, BEN NEWHOUSE,
individually and in his capacity as City Manager
for the City of Hurricane, CLEVELAND
CONSTRUCTION, INC. dba Cleveland
Construction, Inc. Of Nevada, and KANAWHA
STONE COMPANY, INC.,
Defendants.
Putnam County WV Civil Action No. 07-C-298
American football is the most popular sport in the United States at all levels of play. It originated from rugby and soccer and has evolved into the game known today through the contributions of Walter Camp in the late 1800s. The National Football League is the premier professional American football league comprised of 32 teams. The Super Bowl is the championship game of the NFL and is one of the most watched annual sporting events.
This document summarizes several theories of social and emotional development in children and adolescents. It discusses Erikson's psychosocial stages of development, Bandura's social learning theory, and Goleman's theory of emotional intelligence. It also covers theories of moral development from Kohlberg, Turiel, and Gilligan. Factors like parenting styles, role models, peer groups, and their influences on identity formation and socialization are described. Exceptional development in gifted children and juvenile delinquents is also addressed.
This document is a motion filed by attorney R. Scott Joye requesting that the court schedule a hearing for his previously filed motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant G. Ben Thompson. The motion was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in the case of Howard K. Stern v. Stancil Shelley et al. on December 8, 2009 in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina.
This document provides an overview of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. It discusses the history and relationship between Section 504 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Key aspects of Section 504 covered include eligibility, qualifications for being considered disabled, protections from discrimination and harassment, and best practices for school procedures including evaluations, accommodation plans, and periodic reviews. The resources aim to help schools understand and comply with their legal obligations to students with disabilities under Section 504.
Erik Erikson was a German-born American psychologist known for his theory of psychosocial development across the human lifespan. His theory describes 8 stages from infancy to late adulthood, where individuals face conflicts that help develop their ego identity and sense of self. The 8 stages are: trust vs. mistrust (infancy), autonomy vs. shame (early childhood), initiative vs. guilt (preschool), industry vs. inferiority (school age), identity vs. role confusion (adolescence), intimacy vs. isolation (young adulthood), generativity vs. stagnation (middle adulthood), and ego integrity vs. despair (late adulthood). How individuals navigate these conflicts influences their development and psychological well-being
This document provides a summary of a court case regarding a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall. The summary discusses the background of the case, including the relationships and estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall, J. Howard Marshall II, and Pierce Marshall. It also notes that the tortious interference claim was adjudicated in bankruptcy court, while a probate court in Texas was simultaneously administering J. Howard Marshall II's estate. The court must determine which ruling should be given preclusive effect.
This document provides a summary of a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding a longstanding dispute between the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall. The court is revisiting the case after the Supreme Court determined the Ninth Circuit had construed the probate exception too broadly. The case involves a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall regarding a substantial gift from Vickie Lynn's late husband J. Howard Marshall II. The summary is in 3 sentences:
The Ninth Circuit concludes that the findings of an earlier Texas probate court proceeding regarding J. Howard Marshall II's estate plan and intent should be given preclusive effect. The court also finds that the
Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013Putnam Reporter
This document is a final divorce order from the Family Court of Putnam County, West Virginia regarding the divorce of Dolores Jean Halburn and Mark Vance Halburn. It details the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the court. The court granted the divorce based on irreconcilable differences and allocated primary custody of the minor child to Dolores, with every other weekend visitation to Mark. The court considered forensic psychological evaluations of both parties and found Mark has a personality disorder and tendency to generate interpersonal conflicts, posing a risk of harm to the child. Dolores expressed concerns about Mark's volatile behavior escalating conflicts and potentially endangering the child. The court credited Dolores' testimony in restricting Mark's
This order grants default judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Igor Malenko, in a lawsuit against Lori Handrahan. The court found that Handrahan made repeated false allegations against Malenko, including claims of abuse, mental illness, and sexual abuse of their child. These false claims interfered with Malenko's parental rights and caused emotional harm to their child. The court awarded Malenko $450,000 in damages for his individual claims and $300,000 for claims brought on behalf of his minor child.
121412 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.comwww.leag.docxmoggdede
12/14/12 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.com
www.leagle.com/PrintDocument.aspx
IN RE QUINLAN
70 N.J. 10 (1976)
355 A.2d 647
IN THE MATTER O F KAREN Q UINLAN, AN ALLEGED INCO MPETENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 26, 1976.
Decided March 31, 1976.
Mr. Paul W. Armstrong and Mr. James M. Crowley, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause
for appellant Joseph T. Quinlan (Mr. Paul W. Armstrong, attorney).
Mr. Daniel R. Coburn argued the cause for respondent Guardian ad Litem Thomas R. Curtin.
Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, argued the cause for respondent State of
New Jersey (Mr. Hyland, attorney; Mr. David S. Baime and Mr. John DeCicco, Deputy Attorneys General,
of counsel; Mr. Baime, Mr. DeCicco, Ms. Jane E. Deaterly, Mr. Daniel Louis Grossman and Mr. Robert E.
Rochford, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).
Mr. Donald G. Collester, Jr., Morris County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent County of
Morris.
Mr. Ralph Porzio argued the cause for respondents Arshad Javed and Robert J. Morse (Messrs. Porzio,
Bromberg and Newman, attorneys; Mr. Porzio, of counsel; Mr. Porzio and Mr. E. Neal Zimmermann, on the
brief).
Mr. Theodore E.B. Einhorn argued the cause for respondent Saint Clare's Hospital.
Mr. Edward J. Leadem filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Catholic Conference.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.
[ 70 N.J. 18 ]
THE LITIGATION
The central figure in this tragic case is Karen Ann Quinlan, a New Jersey
resident. At the age of 22, she lies in a debilitated and allegedly moribund state at Saint Clare's
Hospital in Denville, New Jersey. The litigation has to do, in final analysis, with her life, — its
continuance or cessation, — and the responsibilities, rights and duties, with regard to any fateful
decision concerning it, of her family, her guardian, her doctors, the hospital, the State through its law
enforcement authorities, and finally the courts of justice.
The issues are before this Court following its direct certification of the action under the rule, R.
2:12-1, prior to hearing in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, to which the appellant (hereafter
"plaintiff") Joseph Quinlan, Karen's father, had appealed the adverse judgment of the Chancery
Division.
Due to extensive physical damage fully described in the able opinion of the trial judge, Judge
12/14/12 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.com
2/22www.leagle.com/PrintDocument.aspx
Muir, supporting that judgment, Karen allegedly was incompetent. Joseph Quinlan sought the
adjudication of that incompetency. He wished to be appointed guardian of the person and property of
his daughter. It was proposed by him that such letters of guardianship, if granted, should contain an
express power to him as guardian to authorize the discontinuance of all extraordinary medical
procedures now allegedly sustaining Karen's vital processes and hence her life, since these
measures ...
This document summarizes a court filing appealing a family court ruling involving allegations of corruption and civil rights violations. It discusses motions from the City of Philadelphia and Department of Human Services to join in quashing the appeal and extending the deadline for filing a brief. The filing asserts that the appellants were victims of corruption and seeks an accurate adjudication of their claims, without discrimination due to their lack of legal knowledge. It answers and protests the motions, arguing they are attempts to cover up misconduct and that the newly appearing attorneys lack qualifications to comment on the matters involved.
This document summarizes a court filing appealing a family court ruling involving allegations of corruption and civil rights violations. It discusses motions from the City of Philadelphia and Department of Human Services to join in quashing the appeal and extending the deadline for filing a brief. The filing asserts that the appellants were victims of corruption and crimes committed against them in family court and by the child advocate attorney. It seeks truth and accurate adjudication unhindered by counterintuitive legal procedures.
This legal memorandum analyzes potential causes of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) against Betty Jefferson related to the death of Thomas Davidson. The memorandum summarizes that Jefferson's son, Michael West, fatally shot Davidson but delayed reporting it and concealed the body. This caused extreme distress to Davidson's parents, Walter and Theresa Davidson. The memorandum evaluates whether Jefferson owed a duty to the Davidsons, if that duty was breached, what injuries resulted, and what caused the distress, concluding there is a strong case for NIED and possible IIED claims against Jefferson.
This document is a letter from Brian D. McGinnis to Stephen M. Hinden Esq. of Hinden & Breslavsky law firm requesting that they file a private citizens' complaint against Sheppard Mullin law firm and Costco's administration for various violations including violation of due process rights, obstruction of justice, judicial misconduct, and fraud. McGinnis also requests that the complaint be forwarded to the Los Angeles District Attorney's office in conjunction with a court order from Judge Debra K. Weintraub recommending an investigation into Sheppard Mullin. McGinnis provides background on past ethics violations and court cases involving Costco, Sheppard Mullin, and issues of attorney-client privilege
Anyone who has experienced difficulties with either Costco or the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP please respond and/or refer this matter to an attorney that can help me. Why? Costco's recent illegal actions relate to MICHAEL KARR the famous (purse) designer where Costco advertized a purse on Mother's Day Costco never carried. It was aired on Good Morning America. I'M STARTING A CAMPAING TO SUPPORT MICHAEL KARR, TIFFINY'S, SONY AND OTHER TO WITHDRAW THERE SUPPORT FROM COSTCO. I was an employee at Costco and they locked me in a room for and hour and ten minutes while they interogiated without legal and or union representtion. Please support this effort to expose Costco and the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton for what they are.....
This document is a letter from Brian D. McGinnis to Stephen M. Hinden Esq. of Hinden & Breslavsky law firm requesting that they file a private citizens' complaint against Sheppard Mullin law firm and Costco's administration for violations of civil rights and judicial misconduct. McGinnis alleges that Sheppard Mullin violated attorney-client privilege in previous cases, interfered with witnesses, and conspired with judges. He provides background on previous cases and ethics violations against Sheppard Mullin and Costco to support the complaint. McGinnis also asks Hinden & Breslavsky to forward the complaint to the LA District Attorney in conjunction with a previous judge's ruling in another
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...Putnam Reporter
A memorandum decision by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of Mark Vance Halburn v Dolores J. M. No. 15-0350 (Putnam County 11-D-516) September 9, 2019.
Criminal Complaint for Telephone Harassment. - State of West Virginia v Mark ...Putnam Reporter
An April 28, 2016 criminal complaint in Kanawha County WV charging blog publisher Mark Vance Halburn with telephone harassment.
Kanawha County Magistrate case number 16M-2960
The "Enduring Walmart" blog in chronological orderPutnam Reporter
Way back in 2006, a whackjob from Putnam County WV named Mark Halburn, who publishes a blog filled with snide, pointless commentary inserted into his “news” stories (namely against his political “enemies” or anyone he feels has wronged him, and it appears, well, that EVERYBODY has wronged him), began writing a questionably-mentally-stable blog about how a Walmart was built next to his wife's house.
Threats, arrests and lawsuits followed.
This was the Enduring Walmart blog, featuring LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS and !!!!!
We present it here in chronological order.
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Putnam Reporter
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order in the appeal of the Final Divorce Order in the case of Dolores Jean Halburn v. Mark Vance Halburn. Case #11d-516 in Putnam County Circuit Court.
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...Putnam Reporter
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed in part and reversed in part a circuit court order regarding a divorce case. The circuit court had affirmed most of the family court's rulings but reversed the family court's allocation of custodial responsibility to the wife and limitations on the husband's visitation. The Supreme Court reinstated the family court's order in its entirety. It found that the family court properly relied on testimony from the wife about the husband's conflicts with others, as well as psychological evaluations showing the husband had a personality disorder with a propensity for generating conflicts, in limiting his visitation to protect the child.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
This document provides a summary of a court case regarding a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall. The summary discusses the background of the case, including the relationships and estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall, J. Howard Marshall II, and Pierce Marshall. It also notes that the tortious interference claim was adjudicated in bankruptcy court, while a probate court in Texas was simultaneously administering J. Howard Marshall II's estate. The court must determine which ruling should be given preclusive effect.
This document provides a summary of a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding a longstanding dispute between the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall. The court is revisiting the case after the Supreme Court determined the Ninth Circuit had construed the probate exception too broadly. The case involves a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall regarding a substantial gift from Vickie Lynn's late husband J. Howard Marshall II. The summary is in 3 sentences:
The Ninth Circuit concludes that the findings of an earlier Texas probate court proceeding regarding J. Howard Marshall II's estate plan and intent should be given preclusive effect. The court also finds that the
Final Divorce Order Halburn v. Halburn 11d-516 1/23/2013Putnam Reporter
This document is a final divorce order from the Family Court of Putnam County, West Virginia regarding the divorce of Dolores Jean Halburn and Mark Vance Halburn. It details the findings of fact and conclusions of law reached by the court. The court granted the divorce based on irreconcilable differences and allocated primary custody of the minor child to Dolores, with every other weekend visitation to Mark. The court considered forensic psychological evaluations of both parties and found Mark has a personality disorder and tendency to generate interpersonal conflicts, posing a risk of harm to the child. Dolores expressed concerns about Mark's volatile behavior escalating conflicts and potentially endangering the child. The court credited Dolores' testimony in restricting Mark's
This order grants default judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Igor Malenko, in a lawsuit against Lori Handrahan. The court found that Handrahan made repeated false allegations against Malenko, including claims of abuse, mental illness, and sexual abuse of their child. These false claims interfered with Malenko's parental rights and caused emotional harm to their child. The court awarded Malenko $450,000 in damages for his individual claims and $300,000 for claims brought on behalf of his minor child.
121412 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.comwww.leag.docxmoggdede
12/14/12 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.com
www.leagle.com/PrintDocument.aspx
IN RE QUINLAN
70 N.J. 10 (1976)
355 A.2d 647
IN THE MATTER O F KAREN Q UINLAN, AN ALLEGED INCO MPETENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 26, 1976.
Decided March 31, 1976.
Mr. Paul W. Armstrong and Mr. James M. Crowley, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause
for appellant Joseph T. Quinlan (Mr. Paul W. Armstrong, attorney).
Mr. Daniel R. Coburn argued the cause for respondent Guardian ad Litem Thomas R. Curtin.
Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, argued the cause for respondent State of
New Jersey (Mr. Hyland, attorney; Mr. David S. Baime and Mr. John DeCicco, Deputy Attorneys General,
of counsel; Mr. Baime, Mr. DeCicco, Ms. Jane E. Deaterly, Mr. Daniel Louis Grossman and Mr. Robert E.
Rochford, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).
Mr. Donald G. Collester, Jr., Morris County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent County of
Morris.
Mr. Ralph Porzio argued the cause for respondents Arshad Javed and Robert J. Morse (Messrs. Porzio,
Bromberg and Newman, attorneys; Mr. Porzio, of counsel; Mr. Porzio and Mr. E. Neal Zimmermann, on the
brief).
Mr. Theodore E.B. Einhorn argued the cause for respondent Saint Clare's Hospital.
Mr. Edward J. Leadem filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Catholic Conference.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.
[ 70 N.J. 18 ]
THE LITIGATION
The central figure in this tragic case is Karen Ann Quinlan, a New Jersey
resident. At the age of 22, she lies in a debilitated and allegedly moribund state at Saint Clare's
Hospital in Denville, New Jersey. The litigation has to do, in final analysis, with her life, — its
continuance or cessation, — and the responsibilities, rights and duties, with regard to any fateful
decision concerning it, of her family, her guardian, her doctors, the hospital, the State through its law
enforcement authorities, and finally the courts of justice.
The issues are before this Court following its direct certification of the action under the rule, R.
2:12-1, prior to hearing in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, to which the appellant (hereafter
"plaintiff") Joseph Quinlan, Karen's father, had appealed the adverse judgment of the Chancery
Division.
Due to extensive physical damage fully described in the able opinion of the trial judge, Judge
12/14/12 This Document is Prov ided by Leagle.com
2/22www.leagle.com/PrintDocument.aspx
Muir, supporting that judgment, Karen allegedly was incompetent. Joseph Quinlan sought the
adjudication of that incompetency. He wished to be appointed guardian of the person and property of
his daughter. It was proposed by him that such letters of guardianship, if granted, should contain an
express power to him as guardian to authorize the discontinuance of all extraordinary medical
procedures now allegedly sustaining Karen's vital processes and hence her life, since these
measures ...
This document summarizes a court filing appealing a family court ruling involving allegations of corruption and civil rights violations. It discusses motions from the City of Philadelphia and Department of Human Services to join in quashing the appeal and extending the deadline for filing a brief. The filing asserts that the appellants were victims of corruption and seeks an accurate adjudication of their claims, without discrimination due to their lack of legal knowledge. It answers and protests the motions, arguing they are attempts to cover up misconduct and that the newly appearing attorneys lack qualifications to comment on the matters involved.
This document summarizes a court filing appealing a family court ruling involving allegations of corruption and civil rights violations. It discusses motions from the City of Philadelphia and Department of Human Services to join in quashing the appeal and extending the deadline for filing a brief. The filing asserts that the appellants were victims of corruption and crimes committed against them in family court and by the child advocate attorney. It seeks truth and accurate adjudication unhindered by counterintuitive legal procedures.
This legal memorandum analyzes potential causes of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) against Betty Jefferson related to the death of Thomas Davidson. The memorandum summarizes that Jefferson's son, Michael West, fatally shot Davidson but delayed reporting it and concealed the body. This caused extreme distress to Davidson's parents, Walter and Theresa Davidson. The memorandum evaluates whether Jefferson owed a duty to the Davidsons, if that duty was breached, what injuries resulted, and what caused the distress, concluding there is a strong case for NIED and possible IIED claims against Jefferson.
This document is a letter from Brian D. McGinnis to Stephen M. Hinden Esq. of Hinden & Breslavsky law firm requesting that they file a private citizens' complaint against Sheppard Mullin law firm and Costco's administration for various violations including violation of due process rights, obstruction of justice, judicial misconduct, and fraud. McGinnis also requests that the complaint be forwarded to the Los Angeles District Attorney's office in conjunction with a court order from Judge Debra K. Weintraub recommending an investigation into Sheppard Mullin. McGinnis provides background on past ethics violations and court cases involving Costco, Sheppard Mullin, and issues of attorney-client privilege
Anyone who has experienced difficulties with either Costco or the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP please respond and/or refer this matter to an attorney that can help me. Why? Costco's recent illegal actions relate to MICHAEL KARR the famous (purse) designer where Costco advertized a purse on Mother's Day Costco never carried. It was aired on Good Morning America. I'M STARTING A CAMPAING TO SUPPORT MICHAEL KARR, TIFFINY'S, SONY AND OTHER TO WITHDRAW THERE SUPPORT FROM COSTCO. I was an employee at Costco and they locked me in a room for and hour and ten minutes while they interogiated without legal and or union representtion. Please support this effort to expose Costco and the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton for what they are.....
This document is a letter from Brian D. McGinnis to Stephen M. Hinden Esq. of Hinden & Breslavsky law firm requesting that they file a private citizens' complaint against Sheppard Mullin law firm and Costco's administration for violations of civil rights and judicial misconduct. McGinnis alleges that Sheppard Mullin violated attorney-client privilege in previous cases, interfered with witnesses, and conspired with judges. He provides background on previous cases and ethics violations against Sheppard Mullin and Costco to support the complaint. McGinnis also asks Hinden & Breslavsky to forward the complaint to the LA District Attorney in conjunction with a previous judge's ruling in another
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...Putnam Reporter
A memorandum decision by the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of Mark Vance Halburn v Dolores J. M. No. 15-0350 (Putnam County 11-D-516) September 9, 2019.
Criminal Complaint for Telephone Harassment. - State of West Virginia v Mark ...Putnam Reporter
An April 28, 2016 criminal complaint in Kanawha County WV charging blog publisher Mark Vance Halburn with telephone harassment.
Kanawha County Magistrate case number 16M-2960
The "Enduring Walmart" blog in chronological orderPutnam Reporter
Way back in 2006, a whackjob from Putnam County WV named Mark Halburn, who publishes a blog filled with snide, pointless commentary inserted into his “news” stories (namely against his political “enemies” or anyone he feels has wronged him, and it appears, well, that EVERYBODY has wronged him), began writing a questionably-mentally-stable blog about how a Walmart was built next to his wife's house.
Threats, arrests and lawsuits followed.
This was the Enduring Walmart blog, featuring LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS and !!!!!
We present it here in chronological order.
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Putnam Reporter
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order in the appeal of the Final Divorce Order in the case of Dolores Jean Halburn v. Mark Vance Halburn. Case #11d-516 in Putnam County Circuit Court.
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...Putnam Reporter
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed in part and reversed in part a circuit court order regarding a divorce case. The circuit court had affirmed most of the family court's rulings but reversed the family court's allocation of custodial responsibility to the wife and limitations on the husband's visitation. The Supreme Court reinstated the family court's order in its entirety. It found that the family court properly relied on testimony from the wife about the husband's conflicts with others, as well as psychological evaluations showing the husband had a personality disorder with a propensity for generating conflicts, in limiting his visitation to protect the child.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Nazarene Camp Lawsuit
1. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NICHOlAS COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA
Mark Halburn
Vs.
Dolores
John Parsons
Mervyn Smith
Arik Paraschos
Nazarene Camp of Summersville, WV
Nazarene Church Southern District, WV
Nazarene Church Northern District, WV
Patricia Keller
John Does 1-50
Jane Does 1- 50, Et. AI.
In May and June of 2017, the Respondents committed Conspiracy, Defamation of Character, Intentional
Affliction of Emotional Distress, Deception of the Court, Lies and Intentionally and Unlawfully Kept Mark
Halburn from Halburn by filing a False and Deceptive Emergency, then Permanent Domestic
Violence Protection Order and Renewed Such Order, all without Due Process as guaranteed by the 14th
Amendment of the United States Constitution.
1) In number 49 and number 50 of her final order, Keller LIES and says that Mark Halburn went to
's camp and "created a disturbance." In fact, on June 21, 2017, Petitioner Halburn
contacted law enforcement about a LAWFUL welfare check, arranged to meet them off the
camp property, and was directed to meet two Nicholas County Sheriff Sergeants at the camp
where a non-disruptive meeting was held as they promised to make the welfare check. Halburn
voluntarily left, without incident. However a camp official came out and acted erratically and in
an intimidating manner, including taking photos of Mark and his rental vehicle and license plate,
2. further verifying Mark Halburn's concern about being exposed to the erratic behavior
of camp officials. When Mark Halburn arrived at home, hours later, he was served with a
temporary DVP, despite doing nothing illegal or unethical with the welfare check. This
temporary DVP was secured by Dolores , Arik Paraschos and camp manager John Parsons
conspiring against Mark Halburn in retaliation for his legal reporting about the camp's 15
Nicholas County Health Department Violations and his lawful request of a welfare check. Keller
repeats her lie that FALSELY accuses Mark Halburn of going into a dorm to take photos and
falsely accuses Mark Halburn of having the health department conduct an inspection. Mark
Halburn has NO authority to order an inspection and did not order any inspection. In fact, PRIOR
to all of this the health department inspected the camp, in May, and found a whopping 15
violations! (the 2018 report was worse: 18 violations!) The fact that Keller LIED about this
situation, in her final order, shows continues bias against Mark Halburn and her MENTAL
INSTABILITY which DISQUALIFIES HER AS A JUDGE IN THIS AND ALL OTHER CASES!
Furthermore, Parsons and Paraschos lied in Family Court Hearings about Mark Halburn entering
a girls dormitory to take photos and about the addition of a security system specifically to
monitor Mark Halburn's activities. The truth is that Mark Halburn made an appointment with
Nicholas County Health Department Administrator, Rodney Boyce, to meet him at the camp,
June 2", 2017, where Mark stayed outside the dorms while Boyce met with camp officials.
Boyce has provided and affidavit proving this and disproving the false allegations of Parsons and
Paraschos.
Mervyn Smith has failed to take corrective action to reverse all of the above and has been rude,
arrogant and repulsive in his reaction to Mark Halburn's request for justice and replacement of
all lost parenting time and expungement and reversal of the illegal DVP's.
3. Due to the gross misconduct of Dolores Dingess, John Parsons, Mervyn Smith, Arik Paraschos
Nazarene Camp of Summersville, WV, Nazarene Church Southern District, WV, Nazarene Church
Northern District, WV, John Does 1-50 and Jane Does 1- 50, et aI., Mark Halburn asks the court for an
immediate and permanent injunction reversing and expunging the Domestic Violence Protection Order,
including the Emergency Order which was issued without Due Process to Mark Halburn and the Equal
Protection of an Emergency Hearing, full makeup parenting time, with - in TRIPLICATE,
makeup and a replay of all lost events including the July 4 parades, of 2017 and 2018, 's 10th
and 11th birthdays, Labor Day Weekends of 2017 and 2018, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and New
Year's Day, 2018, and the replay ofthe summer of 2017. The above is to include all lost time between
Mark and due to the respondent's gross misconduct. The camp official was retaliating for Mark
Halburn's lawful reporting of the camp's 1S Nicholas County Health Department violations, recorded by
a Nicholas County Sanitarian in May of 2017. This retaliation violated Mark Halburn's civil rights as the
Publisher of .com.
Parenting time between a father and son is priceless.
Respondents must also pay for Mark and to visit James Halburn, Sherilynn Thompson and her
family and all Southern California tourist attractions that missed out on due to their conspiracy
and gross misconduct.
Judge Keller's final order must be permanently expunged and reversed due to the Respondents lies and
4. conspiracy that contributed to the order. Keller and the Respondents must, all, be permanently
imprisoned for violating Mark and 's civil rights, retroactively to June 21, 2017.
Because the illegal DVP is a part of Keller's final order, in Putnam County case 11-0-516, the final order
must be expunged and reversed and all copies and reproductions and blog reproductions of said order
must be retrieved by the court and destroyed at Keller's expense.
Ownership of the Nazarene Camp must permanently be given to Mark and Halburn,
retroactively, to June 21, 2017. The Nazarene Church must be ordered to pay for all expenses, operating
costs, staff and manager costs, maintenance and mortgages related to the camp while it is owned by
Mark and Halburn.
Due to their Gross Misconduct, Keller must be permanently removed from the bench with all of her
prior orders reversed and expunged. Paraschos must be permanently disbarred with all of his Guardian
ad Litem reports reversed and expunged and all fees returned to litigants and the State of West Virginia.
Keller and Paraschos must be stripped of their law licenses and not be allowed to practice law again and
be permanently banned from all United States courtrooms.
The 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states that everyone is entitled to "Equal
Protection under the law." Therefore, Judicial immunity is clearly UNCONSTITUTIONAL Therefore Keller
and Paraschos are liable for their gross misconduct in the Halburn cases. Furthermore, the 9
th
Circuit
recently ruled that court officials are liable for lying in court, leaving Paraschos liable for his deception
and gross misconduct!
5. Time between a father and son is priceless. Because of the Respondent's gross misconduct, they must
each be ordered to, immediately, pay the discounted rate of $1 trillion in Compensatory damages, $10
trillion in Punitive damages and $1 trillion, trillion in damages for violating the civil rights of Mark and
Halburn. These damages are due from each of the Respondents to Mark and
Halburn, individually. Judge Keller has already proved that she is Mentally Deranged by criticizing such
damages. Therefore, due to her negative, mentally deranged comments, the nutcase judge is liable for
treble the amounts! Effective the moment that this lawsuit is mailed, the Respondents must, each,
IMMEDIATELY direct deposit these funds into Mark Halburn's Woodforest Bank account and create such
an account for Halburn and, IMMEDIATELY create an account for Halburn and
directly deposit the funds in 's account.
Also, effective IMMEDIATELY, the Respondents must, IMMEDIATELY, turn over PERMANENT AND FULL
CUSTODY of Halburn to Mark Halburn and transport to Mark's location and allow
Mark and to permanently live together outside of West Virginia and its impeached Supreme
Court! Such transportation of is to be at the Respondent's expense.
Because of Dolores continued deception of the court, all child support, paid by Mark
Halburn and all sanctions must be repaid, to Mark Halburn, in TRIPLICATE, RETROACTIVE to 2012.
Dolores must also pay child support, to Mark Halburn, in TRIPLICATE, to 2012, and from
this day forward. She must also pay all of 's medical insurance and expenses. All of this must be
6. in perpetuity!
Because Dolores lied about transferring to Winfield Elementary School, Mark Halburn must be,
IMMEDIATELY, allowed to transfer to the school of Mark Halburn's choice and that Dolores
must be ordered to recreate s first day of school so that Mark may attend and that all events
that Mark missed, due to Dolores' deception, must be recreated so that Mark and can enjoy
them together and so that can enjoy the normal childhood that evil Dolores and the evil courts
deprived them of.
In 2012, Dolores and deranged Family Court Judge Mike Kelly conspired to keep from visiting
his terminally ill grandmother, Nancy Halburn. Dolores had her lawyer, Henry Glass, fax a FABRICATED
email, ex-parte, to Kelly's office. This is an example of mentally deranged behavior by, evil, mentally
deranged people. Nancy died in 2012. In the best interests of a child, cannot continue to be
exposed to Dolores' mental instability and her attacks on his, normal, childhood as well of the attacks,
011 Mark and , by the West Virginia courts. Mentally deranged Judge Keller has made fun of
Mark's PROPER desire for and Nancy Halburn to have a final visit. Therefore, this court must
order Dolores Mike Kelly and Patricia Keller to put Mark and on a charter jet,
immediately, upon receipt of this filing, for a final visit. Whatever extraordinary means that , Kelly
and Keller must undertake to make Nancy Halburn available for the final visit are the problems of
Kelly and Keller and must be paid for at their expense! The Respondents were strong enough to
prevent the final visit. They must be held accountable to be strong enough to create that final visit,
7. immediately! and Nancy Halburn did not choose for Dolores to cheat and file for a divorce.
They must not be, continued, to be damaged by Dolores' immoral behavior and decision!
Only MENTALLY-DERANGED people keep a dying grandmother from her grandchild. Therefore, Dolores
, Henry Glass, Mike Kelly, Patricia Keller and Arik Paraschos must be,lMMEDIATELY, ordered to
undergo, intense, DAILY, mental therapy with a masters-degree educated therapist.
It must be noted that Kelly, Keller and Paraschos are NOT law-abiding court officials. In fact, they are
EVIL! EACH submitted their reports days and MONTHS late from the state requirements. Therefore,
Kelly and Keller's orders must be REVERSED AND EXPUNGED. Paraschos' report also violated Keller's
order deadline and the state deadline so it must ALSO be EXPUNGED!
Mark Halburn also requests that the court order , Paraschos, Parsons, Smith, et. AI., to,
IMMEDIATELY email ALL emails.notesandcorrespondence.et.AI. between all respondents as
DISCOVERY for this lawsuit to MarkHalburn@gmail.com.
8. · .
GLASS LAW OFFICES
Henry R. Glass, Attorney
~bit I
Glass Law Offices
5215 MacCorldeAvenue, S.w.
South Charleston, WV 25309
Phone (304) 766-8858 Fax (304) 766-8853
Email: Glasslaw@Suddenlinkmail.com
Website: Glasslawoffices.com
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: Honorable Mike Kelly
FACSIMILE
NUMBER: (304) 558-5803
FROM: Henry R. Glass, ill
DATE: May 30, 2012
No. PAGES
(With Cover): 2
COMMENTS: Re: Dolores Jean Halburn and Mark Vance Halburn
Putnam Civil Action No. ll-D-516
We are forwarding an exhibit for consideration regarding Mark Halburn's
Emergency Motion, being an email from Mark Halburn to Delores Halburn dated May 28, 2012.
IF PROBLEMS OCCUR IN RECEIVING TIDS FAX, PLEASE CALL (304) 766-8858
The information contained in thisfacsimile transmission is intended onlyfor the use ofthe indNidual or entity named
above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt or protected from disclosure under
applicable law. Ifthe reader ofthis transmission is not the intendedreCipient or the employee or agent responsiblefor
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified thaI any dissemination, distribution or copying a/this
communication is strictlyprohibited. lfyou have receivedthis communication in error, please immediately notifyUS by
telephone andreturn the original message to us by mail. Thank you.
9. • Nicholas County Health Department
One Stevens Road, Suite 201, Summersville, WV 26651
Telephone: (304) 872-5329 - Fax: (304) 872-5362
www.nicholashealthwv.com
AFFIDAVIT
On June 2, 2017, i met with Mr. Mark Halburn upon request for a media-related interview at the
:::hurch of the Nazarene Campground located at 5461 West Webster Road, Summersville,
Nicholas County, West Virginia. Nazarene Campground staff and I entered a dormitory on the
northern edge ofthe property near the campground careteria to review violations recently noted
during a routine inspection. This abbreviated inspection comprised a period of approximately
ten minutes. We entered the building at an eastern ground floor exterior door and exited
through a western ground floor exterior door.
Mr. Hajburn did not enter the buiiding when we entered as directed by camp staff. Upon exit, I
observed Mr. Halburn walking away from the building, but I did not observe him in the building.
I did not observe Mr. Halburn taking photographs of the building. However, I was not in the
company of Mr. Halburn during the ten-minute inspection period, so I can attest to neither Mr.
Halburn's whereabouts !lor actions during that time.
Date
Subscribed and sworn to before me in said County and State this ~day of ~tli"7
My commission expires: ~ /;;~dOl!
Pagelofl
..~:"{;i:~t: OFFICIAL SEAL
"'i>' < NOTARY PUBLIC
f;::. i·~~:~~ ""-;. STATE OF WEST VJRGIf.HA
i;,·t~~ DEBRAB.JACKSON
~~.. ~t?-54"f: N!CHOt.ASCOUNTYHEALn;em
•.•;:--......-- ••- 1STEVENS AO~ •
", I,.", ." SlIMMEASV1UE. WV 25851
My commll.,cl'l e::pj~.. Jut'!. 5, 2a18