Anyone who has experienced difficulties with either Costco or the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP please respond and/or refer this matter to an attorney that can help me. Why? Costco's recent illegal actions relate to MICHAEL KARR the famous (purse) designer where Costco advertized a purse on Mother's Day Costco never carried. It was aired on Good Morning America. I'M STARTING A CAMPAING TO SUPPORT MICHAEL KARR, TIFFINY'S, SONY AND OTHER TO WITHDRAW THERE SUPPORT FROM COSTCO. I was an employee at Costco and they locked me in a room for and hour and ten minutes while they interogiated without legal and or union representtion. Please support this effort to expose Costco and the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton for what they are.....
01/27/18 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT - PLANTERS BANK FORECLOSURE SCAMSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
1 Timothy 1:8 - But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.
As required by National and International Laws this PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT has been drafted to serve as EVIDENCE meeting the PREREQUISITE requirements affording the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and its NAZI and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists to CORRECT the INJUSTICES ADDRESSED!
Furthermore, will provide SUFFICIENTEVIDENCE in the EXPOSURE of the WAR CRIMES of and against SOVEREIGN Citizens (i.e. specifically Natives, Native-Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-of-Color) within the Lands/Territories KNOWN as the United States of America.
Serving as further EVIDENCE of the ABUSE OF POWERS (by TRUSTEES) who may assert such TITLES and/or POSITIONS through TREATIES, etc. that have been BREACHED!
We will leave it at that in that we are aware of LEGAL and LAWFUL avenues available to VICTIMS of such VICIOUS attacks from the NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that have managed to INFILTRATE the United States of America’s Government and FORM the DESPOTISM Empire/Regime that is UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY presently in POWER!
OUR WEBSITES:
Vogel Denise Newsome: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
Utica International Embassy: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
You can GIVE LOVE DONATIONS To Support The Work At:
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
TOLL FREE: (888) 700-5056
MESSAGE: (601) 282-7119
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
ANONYMOUS/CONFIDENTIAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
01/27/18 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT - PLANTERS BANK FORECLOSURE SCAMSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
1 Timothy 1:8 - But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.
As required by National and International Laws this PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT has been drafted to serve as EVIDENCE meeting the PREREQUISITE requirements affording the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and its NAZI and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists to CORRECT the INJUSTICES ADDRESSED!
Furthermore, will provide SUFFICIENTEVIDENCE in the EXPOSURE of the WAR CRIMES of and against SOVEREIGN Citizens (i.e. specifically Natives, Native-Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-of-Color) within the Lands/Territories KNOWN as the United States of America.
Serving as further EVIDENCE of the ABUSE OF POWERS (by TRUSTEES) who may assert such TITLES and/or POSITIONS through TREATIES, etc. that have been BREACHED!
We will leave it at that in that we are aware of LEGAL and LAWFUL avenues available to VICTIMS of such VICIOUS attacks from the NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that have managed to INFILTRATE the United States of America’s Government and FORM the DESPOTISM Empire/Regime that is UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY presently in POWER!
OUR WEBSITES:
Vogel Denise Newsome: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
Utica International Embassy: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
You can GIVE LOVE DONATIONS To Support The Work At:
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
TOLL FREE: (888) 700-5056
MESSAGE: (601) 282-7119
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
ANONYMOUS/CONFIDENTIAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Supporting documentation for the Motion to add 200 new plaintiffs to the Armando Montelongo Lawsuit. This outlines how attempts to Arbitrate the case failed due to Montelongo refusing to follow the American Arbitration Association Rules, thus they declined to arbitrate the case and asked he remove their name from clauses in the contract. In addition, new plaintiff's have approached the case with similar details of fraud. A synopsis of the entire suit is at http://www.jeannorton.com/armando-montelongo-rico-doubles/
The Cost of Litigation: A Case Study, Business Law, Plymouth State University...Kevin O'Shea
In 2009, I presented to Professor Forgues’ Business Law Class at Plymouth State University addressing the high cost of business litigation and using Real Estate Bar Ass'n for Mass., Inc. v. Nat'l Real Estate Info. Servs. 642 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D. Mass. 2009) as a case study.
06/29/18 GOOD-FAITH DEMAND. . . 20180460 (Planters Bank Foreclosure Scams)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Court pleading filed In the Chancery Court of Washington County, Mississippi regarding the FORECLOSURE SCAMS being run by Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Legal Counsel Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm wherein it is Ira B. Johnson’s DUTY and/or OBLIGATION to NOTIFY the Court of the FRAUD and other Crimes being carried out upon it. Rather than wait on Planters Bank & Trust Company to do the RIGHT THING and return her Land(s) and/or Property(s) to her, approximately THREE Weeks later NOTHING! Therefore, Ira B. Johnson is moving forward in NOTIFYING the Court, etc.
NOW let’s watch and see HOW this Court’s Judge(s) address the FRAUD and other Crimes reported. Moreover, whether or not the Judge report the FRAUD and other Criminal activities of Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Lawyer (Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm) to the applicable authorities for investigation(s) and prosecution(s) as required by Statutes/Laws governing such matters!
Supporting documentation for the Motion to add 200 new plaintiffs to the Armando Montelongo Lawsuit. This outlines how attempts to Arbitrate the case failed due to Montelongo refusing to follow the American Arbitration Association Rules, thus they declined to arbitrate the case and asked he remove their name from clauses in the contract. In addition, new plaintiff's have approached the case with similar details of fraud. A synopsis of the entire suit is at http://www.jeannorton.com/armando-montelongo-rico-doubles/
The Cost of Litigation: A Case Study, Business Law, Plymouth State University...Kevin O'Shea
In 2009, I presented to Professor Forgues’ Business Law Class at Plymouth State University addressing the high cost of business litigation and using Real Estate Bar Ass'n for Mass., Inc. v. Nat'l Real Estate Info. Servs. 642 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D. Mass. 2009) as a case study.
06/29/18 GOOD-FAITH DEMAND. . . 20180460 (Planters Bank Foreclosure Scams)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Court pleading filed In the Chancery Court of Washington County, Mississippi regarding the FORECLOSURE SCAMS being run by Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Legal Counsel Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm wherein it is Ira B. Johnson’s DUTY and/or OBLIGATION to NOTIFY the Court of the FRAUD and other Crimes being carried out upon it. Rather than wait on Planters Bank & Trust Company to do the RIGHT THING and return her Land(s) and/or Property(s) to her, approximately THREE Weeks later NOTHING! Therefore, Ira B. Johnson is moving forward in NOTIFYING the Court, etc.
NOW let’s watch and see HOW this Court’s Judge(s) address the FRAUD and other Crimes reported. Moreover, whether or not the Judge report the FRAUD and other Criminal activities of Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Lawyer (Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm) to the applicable authorities for investigation(s) and prosecution(s) as required by Statutes/Laws governing such matters!
How Can Convertible Notes Help a Startup Raise CapitalLawTrades
Convertible Notes are common in Venture Capital. Investors loan funds to a Startup as a round of funding; the capital converts into shares of preferred stock.
How To Protect Your Intellectual Property From InfringementLawTrades
Learn how you can quickly and affordably protect your intellectual property with LawTrades. We break down easy to understand tips to explain the importance of copyright, patents, and trademarks and how they affect your business.
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions May 18, 2015Colorado Su.docxclarebernice
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || May 18, 2015
Colorado Supreme Court -- May 18, 2015
2015 CO 31. No. 13SC9. Pena-Rodriguez v. People.
The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado
2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203
2015 CO 31
Supreme Court Case No. 13SC9
Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Case No. 11CA34
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Pena-Rodriguez,
v.
Respondent:
The People of the State of Colorado.
Judgment Affirmed
en banc
May 18, 2015
Attorneys for Petitioner:
The Law Office of Jonathan D. Rosen, PC
Jonathan D. Rosen
Denver, Colorado
Attorneys for Respondent:
Cynthia H. Coffman, Attorney General
Majid Yazdi, Assistant Attorney General
Denver, Colorado
CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.
JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ dissents, and JUSTICE EID and JUSTICE HOOD join in the dissent.
¶1 This case involves the interplay between two fundamental tenets of the justice system: protecting the
secrecy of jury deliberations and ensuring a defendant’s constitutional right to an impartial jury. After entry of a guilty
verdict, defense counsel obtained juror affidavits suggesting that one of the jurors exhibited racial bias against the
defendant during deliberations. The trial court refused to consider these affidavits, finding that Colorado Rule of
Evidence (“CRE”) 606(b) barred their admission, and the court of appeals affirmed. People v. Pena-Rodriguez, 2012
COA 193, ¶ 3, __ P.3d __. We granted certiorari to consider whether CRE 606(b) applies to such affidavits and, if so,
whether the Sixth Amendment nevertheless requires their admission.1
¶2 We hold that the affidavits regarding the juror’s biased statements fall within the broad sweep of CRE 606(b)
and that they do not satisfy the rule’s “extraneous prejudicial information” exception. We further hold that the trial
court’s application of CRE 606(b) did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I. Facts and Procedural History
¶3 In May 2007, a man made sexual advances toward two teenage girls in the bathroom of the horse-racing
facility where Petitioner Miguel Angel Pena-Rodriguez worked. Shortly thereafter, the girls identified Petitioner as the
assailant during a one-on-one showup. The People subsequently charged Petitioner with one count of sexual assault
on a child—victim less than fifteen; one count of unlawful sexual contact—no consent; and two counts of harassment
—strike, shove, or kick. After a preliminary hearing, the court bound over the first count as attempted sexual assault
on a child— victim less than fifteen.2
¶4 At the start of a three-day trial, the jury venire received a written questionnaire, which inquired, “Is there
http://www.cobar.org/opinions/index.cfm?courtid=2
http://www.cobar.org/opinions/opinionlist.cfm?casedate=5/18/2015&courtid=2
anything about you that you feel would make it diffic ...
Christian Schussele Men of ProgressOil on canvas, 1862Coope.docxtroutmanboris
Christian Schussele Men of Progress
Oil on canvas, 1862
Cooper Union, New York, New York
Transfer from the National Gallery of Art; gift of Andrew W. Mellon, 1942
NPG.65.60
Edward Sorel, “People of Progress” 1999, Cooper Union, New York, New York
Syllabus
The clerks of the Department of State of the United States may be called upon to give evidence of transactions in the Department which are not of a confidential character.
The Secretary of State cannot be called upon as a witness to state transactions of a confidential nature which may have occurred in his Department. But he may be called upon to give testimony of circumstances which were not of that character.
Clerks in the Department of State were directed to be sworn, subject to objections to questions upon confidential matters.
Some point of time must be taken when the power of the Executive over an officer, not removable at his will, must cease. That point of time must be when the constitutional power of appointment has been exercised. And the power has been exercised when the last act required from the person possessing the power has been performed. This last act is the signature of the commission.
If the act of livery be necessary to give validity to the commission of an officer, it has been delivered when executed, and given to the Secretary of State for the purpose of being sealed, recorded, and transmitted to the party.
In cases of commissions to public officers, the law orders the Secretary of State to record them. When, therefore, they are signed and sealed, the order for their being recorded is given, and, whether inserted inserted into the book or not, they are recorded.
When the heads of the departments of the Government are the political or confidential officers of the Executive, merely to execute the will of the President, or rather to act in cases in which the Executive possesses a constitutional or legal discretion, nothing can be more perfectly clear than that their acts are only politically examinable. But where a specific duty is assigned by law, and individual rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear that the individual who considers himself injured has a right to resort to the laws of his country for a remedy.
The President of the United States, by signing the commission, appointed Mr. Marbury a justice of the peace for the County of Washington, in the District of Columbia, and the seal of the United States, affixed thereto by the Secretary of State, is conclusive testimony of the verity of the signature, and of the completion of the appointment; and the appointment conferred on him a legal right to the office for the space of five years. Having this legal right to the office, he has a consequent right to the commission, a refusal to deliver which is a plain violation of that right for which the laws of the country afford him a remedy.
To render a mandamus a proper remedy, the officer to whom it is directed must be one to who.
4 Justice Radio has created the, "I AM FERGUSON Project" (#IAMFERGUSON) to highlight the shocking "anti-civil rights plan" revealed by the death of teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO at the hands of police officer Darren Wilson: that there exists a "hide-in-plain-sight" policy in the city of Ferguson, NO to enslave the black residents and to deprive them of their freedom and property. Using the police force to criminalize black residents with bogus charges the judges then used the courts as a cash register to collect illegal fines levied against them. What is also hiding in plain sight is that federal civil rights agencies like the Department of Justice and others under the Obama Administration have implemented a covert policy that refuses to fairly investigate racial discrimination complaints filed by black and other non-white people. In this report, we profile the work of the Department of Justice's Office of Justice Programs to protect federal financial recipients in the City of Alexandria, Virginia's local court and presiding Judge Becky Moore, Nolan Dawkins, and Donald Haddock, Jr. as they use their power to target and take black people's property Stay tuned for continuing coverage 4 Justice!
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
1. May 5, 2013
Attn: Mr. Stephen M. Hinden Esq.
HINDEN & BRESLAVSKY
4661 Pico Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90019
Re: “BRIAN D. McGINNIS (PETITIONER REQUEST T HE LAW FIRM OF HINDON & BRESLAVSKY TO FILE A
PRIVATE CITIZENS” COMPLAINT AGAINST THE LAW FIRM OF SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER
& HAMPTON LLP.; ALSO, AGAINST COSTCO’S ADMINISTRATION & CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL
JOEL BENOLIEL FOR VIOLATION OF THE SIXTH AMENDEMENT,”, “THE RIGHT OF DUE
PROCESS”, “JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT”, “ OBSTRUCTION OF JUDTICE” , FRAUD”, AND, “CONSPIRACY”
AND , INCONJUNCT WITH LOS SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE DEBRA K. WINTRAUB’S ORDER REGARDING
THE CUDAHY (MATTHEW MONFORTON CASE; INCONJUNCT WITH JUDGE WEINTRAUB’S
RECOMMENDATION TO MS. KAMALA HARRIS, OF THE ATTORNEY GENRALS OFFICE, THAT AN
IMMEDIATE “INVESTIGATION” BE CONDUCTED, ALSO, IN SUPPORT OF THE 2009 EITHICS ROUNDUP,
“ATTORENY-CLIENT PRIVILEGES” OF ETHICIAL VIOLATIONS.
Dear Mr. Stephen m. Hinden,
My name is Brian D. McGinnis (Petitioner) case no. ADJ 7950019, SC114162, SS022063-SS022066,
B243154; AN, SANTOS GARCIA C A NO BC 458642)) the petitioner is petitioning the law firm of Hinden &
Breslavsky, as a private citizen, to file a complaint first with The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office,
“Bureau of Investigations”, Chief Dominick Rivetti, against Senior Vice President & Administration &
Legal Officer Joel Benoliel and the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP (Sheppard
Mullin) “Direct Writer” Matthew S. McConnell, Lisa S. Wilcox and Mark G. Rackers for violation of the
petitioners Sixth Amendment Rights the “Right of Due Process”, “Obstruction of Justice”, “Judicial
Misconduct”, “Fraud”, and “Conspiracy” which are criminal acts.
Second, the petitioner is, also, requesting the law firm of Hinden & Breslavsky to forward the petitioners
“private citizens” complaint to the Los Angeles District Attorneys office, in conjunct with Los Angeles
Superior Court Judge Debra K. Weintraub’s February 18, 2011 ORDER
(NOTE: At the exact same time Judge Weintraub was requesting Kamala Harris
Of the United State Attorney General’s Office the petitioners witnesses, in his
civil case, were being interrogated by Ms. Lisa S. Wilcox, from the law
firm of Sheppard Mullin’s, ruled that the “Crime-Fraud” exception, in the
City of Cudahy v. Sheppard Mullin et al, in the Matthew G. Monforton case,
a former Los Angeles Deputy.)
District attorney who filed a motion to compel production of documents in
1
2. (Monforton’s) his qui tam case against Sheppard, Mullin.)
Whereupon, Judge Weintraub, after ordering Sheppard Mullin to produce records requested Kamala
Harris, from the United States Attorney General Office that an immediate “Investigation” be conducted,
against the law firm of Sheppard Mullins.
Third, in 2009 the Los Angeles County Bar Association cited Costco (Administration and Chief Legal
Officer Joel Benoliel) and Sheppard Mullins for Ethics violations and were rounded up. At issue was were
statements made by employees interviewed by a Sheppard Mullin partner confidential and protected by
the attorney-client privilege.
Two years later and at the same with Lisa S. Wilcox, from the law firm of Sheppard Mullins, standing
befrorethe Honorable Debra K. Weintraub, knowing that the law firm was already cited for violation of
the ‘attoreny-client” privilege interviewed the same witness the rounded up and cited f or ethics and
violation of the “Attorney-client” privilege under the supervision and guidance of Costco’s Chief was
cited in the Los Angeles County Bar Association article dated March 2010, Vol. 33, No. 1, states that
federal criminal cases collapsed due to prosecutorial misconduct Judge Cormac J. Carney denounced the
prosecutors “shameful intimidation of witnesses, which he said, “distort the truth-finding process and
compromised the integrity of the trial. The same facts are evident below.
The article goes on to say, on page 2 “Attorney Client Privilege”, was the subject of significant decisions
in 2009. In the Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court granted a
review after Los Angeles Superior Court ordered the production of portions of an opinion letter from
Sheppard Mullin law firm to its client Costco, and the Second District Court of Appeal denied a petition
for a writ of mandate to block production. At issue was whether statements by employees interviewed
by Sheppard Mullin partner and reflected in her opinion letter were confidential and protected by the
attorney-client privilege.
request that an immediate Investigation, with regards to the be conducted by her office be forward to
Kamala Harris, of the Attorney General’s office in conjunct with Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Debra
K. Weintraub request, to the United States Attorney
But, the issue of this complaint is exemplified by David R. Garcia from the Beverly Hills office of
Sheppard Mullin. What David Garcia argued was “their (Judge Weinberg) applicability of the crime-
fraud exception ought to turn on the “state of mind of the client with respect to the underlying crime,”
and whether or not the client engaged the lawyer for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the
crime.
What David Garcia fails to mention is what Sheppard Mullins independent actions/legal practices are as
being nefarious to the judicial system itself which as indicated below. is the independent action of the
law firm of Sheppard Mullin’s independent action(s) independent of the client? It is this premise the
petitioner’s base one of his following complaint(s) and support of Judge request that an immediate
“investigation” be conducted against the law firm of Sheppard Mullins.
2
3. subsequent the
that the of the attorney-client privilege applied and recommendation that an immediate “investigation”
be commenced.
ever, prior to the petitioner address those issues the petitioner will address the response Sheppard
Mullin will try and rebut the petitioners below facts. It must be noted that one of the defenses
Sheppard Mullins will try and use is the fact the petitioners Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) complaint was DISMISSED. What Sheppard Mullin’s will not tell you is twenty-five of the forty-
eight specific allegations, by the petitioner, in his complaint to the EEOC were, on April 4, 2011, were
falsely rebutted Sheppard Mullin’s “Direct Writer” Matthew X. McConnell,. And, at the hearing the
petitioner is requesting the petitioners will provide the presiding Judge with factual evidence to support
the petitioner’s position.
Second, Sheppard Mullins will also tray and claim that the petitioners complaint to Chief Legal Counsel
XXXX of the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s complaint was DISIMISSED. What Sheppard Mullins
will not tell you are there was/is a “conflict of interest” when there is a legal association within the Bar
Association that conflicts with the interest of any complaining party.
Third, that the petitioners civil matter (SC 114162) was DSIMISSED. What Sheppard Mullins will not tell
you is Mark G. Rackers, of Sheppard Mullins had prior communication with Los Angeles Superior Court
Judge Joseph S. Biderman who contacted Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Lisa Hart-Cole. who after
repeated request by the court at the petitioners XXXXX hearing, whereupon the petitioner was ready
and willing to submit his FRIST AMENDED COMPLAINT, guaranteed to, was mysteriously, DISMISSED.
Forth, what Sheppard Mullin will not tell you is Mark G. Rackers conspired with the petitioner’s
attorney, Ronald M. Canter, and the defense counsel Jay S. Cohen, from the law firm of Mullins & Fillips
LLP. To have the petitioner followed once the petitioner left his previous, September 21, 2010,
Deposition,
tin the petitioners “Worker’s Compensation” case, to have the peti
plaint based on the following facts. However, before the petitioner addresses those facts the petitioner
will first address the issue of his doctors (Doctor Seth Hirsh) recent assessment of the petitioner. At the
end do the petitioners last visit with doctor Hirsch the petitioner was asides as being the captain of the
Basically, Doctor Hirsh has assessed the petitioner mental unstable with reference to the 1954 movie
“The Caine Mutiny”, as the captain of a World War ship, is relieved of his command because of his
“Mental Instability”. The following facts will clearly demonstrate to “any reasonable person” that
Doctor Hirsch’s assessment should have been along the lines of the famous movie “Mutiny On The
Bounty” staring Clark Gable.
But, before the petitioner address the issues described above the following must be noted. In 2009
In an article by Los Angeles Bar Association dated March of 2010 Vol. 33, No. 1, “MCLE Article 2009
“Roundup”, where Costco Wholesale Corporation was the subject of the Attorney-Client Privilege.
Whereupon, the Supreme Court finally decided that Costco had wrongfully invaded the Attorney-Client
3
4. Privilege. Moreover, the court held that a party seeking extraordinary relief from a discovery order that
wrongfully invaded the attorney-client relationship need not to establish harm from disclosure.”
In a second article, from the Metropolitan News-Enterprise, dated February 11, 2011 Judge Debra K.
Weintraub order, on Friday February 18 ,2011, the law firm of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
And, was the subject of the is states,
4