This document introduces Integrative Propositional Analysis (IPA), a new tool developed by Steven Wallis to quantitatively assess the probability that a proposed policy will achieve its intended goals. IPA examines the logical structure of policy documents to assign a numerical value forecasting the likelihood of success or failure. The founders of the Center for Analysis of Science in Policy hope to further develop and automate IPA, demonstrate its use during policy creation, and teach policymakers how to use it to identify issues early, compare alternatives, and facilitate bipartisan collaboration. They are seeking funding to hire fellows to perform analyses, attend conferences, and automate the currently manual IPA process.
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 9: Ethnography // Slideshow 4: Ethnographic approach: Rigour & Ethics
This is the fourth slideshow of Module 9: Ethnography, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 9: Ethnography
The ethnographic approach offers a unique research space to better understand context (political, social, institutional, and historical) of health policies and policy formulation; and how these policies are translated and come alive in health systems. This approach lends itself well for a nuanced analysis of the relationships between power, knowledge and practice in health systems. In this module the (a) roots of ethnographic approach, (b) distinguishing ethnography per se from qualitative research; (c) ethnographic approach and health systems as social institutions & (d) ethical issues and rigour are explored.
There are 4 slideshows in this module.
Module 9: Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 1: Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 2: Qualitative Research and Ethnography: Overlaps and Distinctions
-Module 9 Slideshow 3: Health Systems Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 4: Ethnographic approach: Rigour & Ethics
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 6: Policy analysis
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Preparing a Research Plan
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative.
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 6: Policy Analysis // Slideshow 2: Policy Approach and Frameworks
This is the second slideshow of Module 6: Policy Analysis, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 6: Policy analysis
This module focuses on the policy analysis approach to understand who makes policy decisions (power) and how and why these decisions are made (process). As a field primarily preoccupied with understanding decision-making, contemporary policy analysis approaches place actors at the heart of systems, problematize policy content, are attentive to context, and can see implementation as a series of social relationships rather than as an obvious consequence of policymaking.
There are 5 slideshows in this module.
Module 6: Policy analysis
-Module 6 Slideshow 1: Introducing Health Policy
-Module 6 Slideshow 2: Policy Approach & Frameworks
-Module 6 Slideshow 3: Researching Health Policy
-Module 6 Slideshow 4: Group work
-Module 6 Slideshow 5: Group work
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 9: Ethnography
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Research Plan Writing
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 9: Ethnography // Slideshow 4: Ethnographic approach: Rigour & Ethics
This is the fourth slideshow of Module 9: Ethnography, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 9: Ethnography
The ethnographic approach offers a unique research space to better understand context (political, social, institutional, and historical) of health policies and policy formulation; and how these policies are translated and come alive in health systems. This approach lends itself well for a nuanced analysis of the relationships between power, knowledge and practice in health systems. In this module the (a) roots of ethnographic approach, (b) distinguishing ethnography per se from qualitative research; (c) ethnographic approach and health systems as social institutions & (d) ethical issues and rigour are explored.
There are 4 slideshows in this module.
Module 9: Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 1: Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 2: Qualitative Research and Ethnography: Overlaps and Distinctions
-Module 9 Slideshow 3: Health Systems Ethnography
-Module 9 Slideshow 4: Ethnographic approach: Rigour & Ethics
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 6: Policy analysis
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Preparing a Research Plan
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative.
KEYSTONE HPSR Initiative // Module 6: Policy Analysis // Slideshow 2: Policy Approach and Frameworks
This is the second slideshow of Module 6: Policy Analysis, of the KEYSTONE Teaching and Learning Resources for Health Policy and Systems Research
To access video sessions and slides for all modules copy and past the following link in your browser:
http://bit.ly/25vVVp1
Module 6: Policy analysis
This module focuses on the policy analysis approach to understand who makes policy decisions (power) and how and why these decisions are made (process). As a field primarily preoccupied with understanding decision-making, contemporary policy analysis approaches place actors at the heart of systems, problematize policy content, are attentive to context, and can see implementation as a series of social relationships rather than as an obvious consequence of policymaking.
There are 5 slideshows in this module.
Module 6: Policy analysis
-Module 6 Slideshow 1: Introducing Health Policy
-Module 6 Slideshow 2: Policy Approach & Frameworks
-Module 6 Slideshow 3: Researching Health Policy
-Module 6 Slideshow 4: Group work
-Module 6 Slideshow 5: Group work
The other modules in this series are:
Module 1: Introducing Health Systems & Health Policy
Module 2: Social justice, equity & gender
Module 3: System complexity
Module 4: Health Policy and Systems Research frameworks
Module 5: Economic analysis
Module 7: Realist evaluation
Module 8: Systems thinking
Module 9: Ethnography
Module 10: Implementation research
Module 11: Participatory action research
Module 12: Knowledge translation
Module 13: Research Plan Writing
KEYSTONE is a collective initiative of several Indian health policy and systems research (HPSR) organizations to strengthen national capacity in HPSR towards addressing critical needs of health systems and policy development. KEYSTONE is convened by the Public Health Foundation of India in its role as Nodal Institute of the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR).
The inaugural KEYSTONE short course was conducted in New Delhi from 23 February – 5 March 2015. In the process of delivering the inaugural course, a suite of teaching and learning materials were developed under Creative Commons license, and are being made available as open access resources. The KEYSTONE teaching and learning resources include 38 videos and 32 slide presentations organized into 13 modules. These materials cover foundational concepts, common approaches used in HPSR, and guidance for preparing a research plan.
These resources were created and are made available through support and funding from the Alliance for Health Policy & Systems Research (AHPSR), WHO for the KEYSTONE initiative
Existem livros que lemos somente uma vez. Outros nos servem de inspiração semanal para nosso trabalho voluntário nas Alcateias, Tropas e Clãs.
Apreciaria muito se esse livro fosse bastante rabiscado, com observações pessoais que destacassem aspectos lembrados pelo nosso fundador, ao invés de simplesmente guardar sugestões sem aplicação nos nossos Grupos Escoteiros.
Existem livros que lemos somente uma vez. Outros nos servem de inspiração semanal para nosso trabalho voluntário nas Alcateias, Tropas e Clãs.
Apreciaria muito se esse livro fosse bastante rabiscado, com observações pessoais que destacassem aspectos lembrados pelo nosso fundador, ao invés de simplesmente guardar sugestões sem aplicação nos nossos Grupos Escoteiros.
Measuring Success: Community groups and environmental restoration MonicaPeters
Citizen Science is a global phenomenon. Many projects are large scale and designed by scientists with the public as data collectors. This presentation delivered at the Yellow-Eyed Penguin Trust's 25 year celebration (Oct 17-18, Dunedin, New Zealand) highlights preliminary findings from PhD research into NZ community groups and their restoration activities.
Involucrar a los responsables políticos para priorizar proyectos de investiga...investenisciii
XVI Encuentro Internacional de Investigación en Cuidados
CONFERENCIA CLAUSURA:
Alba DiCenso: Involucrar a los responsables políticos para priorizar proyectos de investigación que influyan en las políticas de salud
Assessment 1PRINTAnalysis of Position Papers for Vulnerabl.docxgalerussel59292
Assessment 1
PRINT
Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations
Toggle Drawer
Overview
Develop a 4–6-page position about a specific health care issue as it relates to a target vulnerable population. Include an analysis of existing evidence and position papers to help support your position. Your analysis should also present and respond to one or more opposing viewpoints.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Position papers are a method to evaluate the most current evidence and policies related to health care issues. They offer a way for researchers to explore the views of any number of organizations around a topic. This can help you to develop your own position and approach to care around a topic or issue.
SHOW LESS
This assessment will focus on analyzing position papers about an issue related to addiction, chronicity, emotional and mental health, genetics and genomics, or immunity. Many of these topics are quickly evolving as technology advances, or as we attempt to push past stigmas. For example, technology advances and DNA sequencing provide comprehensive information to allow treatment to become more targeted and effective for the individual. However as a result, nurses must be able to understand and teach patients about the impact of this information. With this great power comes concerns that patient conditions are protected in an ethical and compassionate manner.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that could support a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Evaluate the evidence and positions of others that are contrary to a team's approach to improving the quality and outcomes of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
Explain the role of the interprofessional team in facilitating improvements for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
Explain a position with regard to health outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Communicate an initial viewpoint regarding a specific issue in a target population and a synthesis of existing positions in a logically s.
NCE Symposium The Alberta Family Wellness Initiative - Where Science Meets Re...KBHN KT
NCE Symposium - The conditions for impact June 27, 2016. Michelle Gagnon introduced the Alberta Family Wellness Initiative (AFWI), and a summary and considerations for moving knowledge to impact.
Measuring competence: building an assessment tool for public health graduate ...Erin D. Foster
Presentation for the Pacific Northwest Region of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine "PNR Partners" webinar series in March 2016.
Link to webinar recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaKc8Aa4Gko
Discussion 1 The Influence of Mission and Vision on PlanningAs .docxowenhall46084
Discussion 1: The Influence of Mission and Vision on Planning
As you read the following mission statements, think about what you might deduce about each organization:
“Nurses advancing our profession to improve health for all,” American Nurses Association
“The American Red Cross prevents and alleviates human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors,” American Red Cross
“The mission of Southwest Airlines is dedication to the highest quality of Customer Service delivered with a sense of warmth, friendliness, individual pride, and Company Spirit,” Southwest Airlines
“To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education and research,” Mayo Clinic
“Provide telehealth solutions and executive medical research management to enhance and support military healthcare and promote innovative medical technologies,” Telemedicine & Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC)
“Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful,” Google
An organization’s mission describes its core purpose. In partnership with the organization’s vision, which communicates a future-focused direction, the mission provides a basis for planning and decision making at all levels of the organization.
For this Discussion, you compare mission and vision statements from multiple organizations and consider how these statements relate to planning.
To prepare:
Review the information related to the planning hierarchy and mission and vision statements in this week’s Learning Resources.
Research the mission and vision statements of three different types of organizations: a for-profit health care organization, a not-for-profit health care organization, and an organization outside of health care. As you examine the organizations’ mission and vision statements, consider the following:
How effectively do the mission statements articulate the organization’s purpose?
How effectively do the vision statements reflect future aims?
Do the mission and vision statements convey who (which groups) the organizations serve? Do they indicate obligations to various stakeholders?
Are the statements an appropriate length?
What do you glean about how leaders in health care and in other industries envision and convey mission and vision?
What do you discern about the interdisciplinary nature of crafting mission and vision statements by looking across organizations, including those outside of health care?
Identify key insights you have gained by comparing the mission and vision statements of these three organizations.
Consider how an organization’s mission and vision relate to the planning hierarchy. For each organization you have selected, think about how the mission and vision could or should influence planning. What elements of each mission and vision stand out as especially significant?
Post a comparison.
Menu Management Options· · APRN504 - 5886 - HEALTH POLICY .docxandreecapon
Menu Management Options
·
·
APRN504 - 5886 - HEALTH POLICY AND LEADERSHIP - Spring2016
· Home Page
· Announcements
· Syllabus
· Discussions
· Weekly news update
· Assignments
· Sign up Wiki
· Writing Information
· Groups
· Week One
· PowerPoint Week #1
· PowerPoints Week #1
· Week Two: Information
· Week Three
· PowerPoint:Week #3 Policy
· PowerPoint-Communication
· PowerPoint: SS
· Week Four
· PowerPoint: Finances
· PowerPoint-Ethics
· Week Five
· Week Six
· Week Seven
· Week Eight
· PowerPoint: Lobbying
· Week Nine
· PowerPoint:Workplace
· Week Ten
· Week Eleven
· PowerPoint:Centers
· PP: Putting it Together
· Week Twelve
· Week Thirteen
· Week Fourteen
· Week Fifteen
· APA Links
· Help
· Tools
PowerPoint Week #1
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Content
·
Social Determinants of Health
·
One view of the ACA
·
Another view of ACA
Remember South Carolina did NOT take the Medicaid expansion.
·
South Carolina and Medicaid
·
The IOM and Nursing
· Nursing and Politics
·
Mentoring
·
The Difference in Political Philosophy
·
Policy Process
GRADING RUBRICS:
Journals: The Journals should be a synopsis of ALL your required readings and PowerPoints. These papers are three to six pages long and include a reference page. Tell me what you learned. Failure to cover any aspect of the information will result is loss of points. APA format is required so remember your title page. The required APA textbook has examples from pages 41-59. Spelling and grammar issues will result in loss of points. Late Submissions: Minus 10 points/day.
Forum: Discussion Board
Organize Forum Threads on this page and apply settings to several or all threads. Threads are listed in a tabular format. The Threads can be sorted by clicking the column title or the caret at the top of each column. More Help
Content
Top of Form
This is a 'post-first' discussion forum.
There are currently 18 threads in this forum. Join the conversation by creating a thread!
Create Thread
Forum Description
Introduce yourself. Tell us your background and what track you are currently in. Have you had any experience with politics, leadership or political events? What do you hope to gain from this course? What are your concerns about taking a hybid course? What do you wish other people knew about you? Where do you hope to be five years from now? What has been your experience in a Political Group (ANA, SCNA, ANCC, ACNP, SCMA, Republican Party, Democratic Party, etc) and the role they play in politics? Inform us of what district you live in, who is your current represenative and senator for your district. A meaningful response to two classmates and facilitation of a dialog is an expectation for the discussion board. You can not post "I agree" or "I disagree". A discussion is like a ball being tossed back and forth. If you ask questions of your classmates you facilitate dialog. The discussion Boards are open for two weeks and close on Sundays at 11:59 pm. Do not wait until the last minute to post becaus ...
Write a report on the application of population health improveme.docxarnoldmeredith47041
Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
SHOW LESS
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative.
Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.
Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.
Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients.
Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care.
Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.
Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics.
Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Evidence-Based Practice
Devine, D. A., Wenger, B., Krugman, M., Zwink, J. E., Shiskowsky, K., Hagman, J., . . . Reeves, C. (2015).
Part 1: Evidence-based facility design using transforming care at the bedside principles [PDF]
.
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
,
45
(2), 74–83.
Jeffs, L., Beswick, S., Lo, J., Campbell, H., Ferris, E., & Sidani, S. (2013).
Defining what evidence is, linking it to patient outcomes, and making it relevant to practice: Insight from clinical nurses
.
Applied Nursing Research
,
26
(3), 105–109.
Krugman, M., Sanders, C., & Kinney, L. J. (2015).
Part 2: Evaluation and outcomes of an evidence-based facility design project
.
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
,
45
(2), 84–92.
Rice, M. J. (2013).
Evidence-based practice: A model for clinical application
.
Journal of the American Psychiatric .
The International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education would like to present our research, grant funding, and publication information within the network.
Financial Statements and Ratios for Decision-MakingRequirements.docxAKHIL969626
Financial Statements and Ratios for Decision-Making
Requirements:
APA of 1600 words, include in-text citations and references in APA format (Referenced necessary) on the following subjects:
1. How to Create, evaluate, and analyze the balance sheet.
2. How to Perform vertical and horizontal analysis of the balance sheet.
3. How to Create, evaluate, and analyze the income statement.
4. How to Perform vertical and horizontal analysis of the income statement.
5. Difference between balance sheet and income statement.
6. Horizontal and vertical analyses of each statement.
7. Use financial ratios to make investment decisions.
8. what would be the consequences of a manager/leader who disregards using these statements as a management tool? On the other hand, can a manager place too much emphasis on the numbers to the detriment of the organization?
Note: you will need access to the book, please contact me for access
Deactivated
Carlos Lopez
2 posts
Re:Topic 7 DQ 1
In an article published by Harris, et. al (2011), they stated “some evidence-based practices spread passively and are adopted without additional support or instigation from outside the user organization”. Depending on the practice being spread, this can determine how to spread it. One internal dissemination method could be via the office’s intranet. Using this method, it allows everyone in the office access to the results. As this project is based out of a health clinic, it will allow all the providers to see and review all the results, as well as decide if they will implement it into their project, as well as how they will. This can be done via a community board that allows others to put forth their input, allowing a group discussion that can be constructive and productive. This could be considered a more passive approach. An external approach could be putting on an act in a theater. While this may seem out in left field, there have been successes using this method. Keen and Todres (2007) highlight some examples, such as Handle with Care, No Big Deal, Syncing Out Loud, and Busting. These used research-based theater/ethnodrama to represent their ideas and get the information out to the public. They used transcripts from their research interviews to make the scripts. No Big Deal, for example “lasts 40 minutes and is followed by a 15-minute facilitated discussion period”, making it “designed to fit into a one-hour time-slot for a hospital round or lunch break” (Keen & Todres, 2007). This helps to disseminate the information to other clinics, or hospitals, helping to get the word out.
It is important to pass this information out, not only internally but externally as well, because in the end, the care of the patients, and our quality and ability to do so, is what is important. The more EBP that is out there, the better we can provide that care. In terms of my communication strategies, they would differ slightly. Internally, it is more informal, whereas externally, it would ...
Similar to Nash improving the quality of policy decisions v.9 copy (20)
2. IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF POLICY DECISIONS
Today, there is no way to
forecast the outcome of a
policy before it is enacted.
True?
2
3. IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF POLICY DECISIONS
FALSE !
… because there now is a tool
that expresses numerically
the probability
that a policy will achieve its goal.
3
4. 4
What if I showed you a new tool that could give
you a numerical index of the probability that a
policy will succeed?
"Impossible" you would say, but believe me, that
tool is here, and here’s what we can do with it.
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF POLICY DECISIONS
5. What is that tool?
(Restless, anxious breathing, agitated movement.)
5
8. APPLYING IPA 1.1
Through examining the logical structure of a
document, we can assign a numerical
value to the probability that the policy will
be successful - or not!
8
9. 9
Applying IPA during policy development, we can
identify defects in the policy at that stage,
permitting us to step back, modify and improve the
result.
APPLYING IPA 1.2
10. 10
When there are several policy alternatives, they
can be compared and the superior one selected for
completion.
This can obviate ideological gridlock, prompting
bi-partisan collaboration.
APPLYING IPA 1.3
11. GOALS &
OBJECTIVES
1. Further development of IPA theory
2. Automation of the now largely manual process
3. Perform analyses on documents submitted
4. Teach the use of IPA to policy makers
5. Demonstrate use of IPA during creation of policy
6. Make IPA an open platform for the common good
11
12. NEEDS
1. Hire postdoctoral fellows to perform analyses
2. Travel expenses to regional and national meetings
3. Part-time administrative assistant
4. Routine office and administrative costs
5. Marketing and publicity
6. Computer programmer to automate analyses
Estimated start up cost: $15,000
12
13. 13
PUBLICATIONS UNDER SUBMISSION
Using Integrative Propositional Analysis (IPA) to Study the USAID/PERU Country Development Cooperation Strategy
Are theories of conflict improving? Using propositional analysis to determine the structure of conflict theories over the course of a century
Using Integrative Propositional Analysis to analyze the potential usefulness of “People sharing Resources” Theory and indicating
directions for advancement
Whole Scraps and Partial Maps: Investigating Some Underlying Assumptions of AQAL
PUBLICATIONS
Academic Publications
Wallis, S. (in press – publication anticipated in 2014) Propositional Analysis for Evaluating Explanations through their Conceptual Structures.
Chapter in “Modes of Explanation: Affordances for Action and Prediction” (edited by Michael Lissack and Abraham Graber).
Palgrave MacMillan. Wallis, S. (2014). Structures of logic in policy and theory: Identifying sub-systemic bricks for investigating, building, and
understanding conceptual systems. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9360-4 Wallis, S. (2014). Existing and emerging methods
for integrating theories within and between disciplines. Journal for Organizational Transformation and Social Change. Guest Editor, Steven
Wallis, Vol. 11 (1).
Wallis, S. (2013). How to Choose Between Policy Proposals: A Simple Tool Based on Systems Thinking and Complexity Theory. E:CO –
Emergence: Complexity and Organizations. Vol. 15 (3).
Wallis, S. (2011). “Avoiding Policy Failure: A Workable Approach.” Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications, ISBN: 978-0-9842165-0-5.
Wallis, S. (2010). “Developing Effective Ethics for Effective Behavior.” Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 6 (4).
Wallis, S. (2010). “Toward the Development of More Effective Policy Models.” Integral Review – special issue “Toward Development of Politics
and the Political.” Vol. 6 (1), p 153-177.
Wallis, S. (2010). “The structure of theory and the structure of scientific revolutions: What constitutes an advance in theory?” Chapter in
“Cybernetics and Systems Theory in Management: Tools, Views and Advancements.” Wallis, S. E. (Ed.) Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
IPA: Selected Publications
14. 14
Franklin D. Nash, MD
Dr. Nash is an 82 year-old former Professor of Medicine at the Indiana University
School of Medicine, specializing in Nephrology (renal disease and hypertension), with
emphasis on research and teaching. In recent years he has been distressed by the abuse of
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics for partisan and ideological purposes in
creation of Congressional bills that have resulted in policies detrimental to the interests of
the American people. Attempting to see to an increase on the quality of policy
determinations, he founded the Center for Evaluation of Science in Policy
(www.scipolicy.org) that now serves as a vehicle for promoting the use of Integrative
Propositional Analysis (IPA), the first quantitative means of forecasting and improving the
effectiveness of policy during its origination.
In retirement, he has served as a life and health insurance company Medical
Director and Vice President for Academic Affairs at the RMP Institute of Biomechanics.
During his active years, Dr. Nash consulted for Social Security Disability, Medicare,
Medicaid, and for the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine among other organizations and
was a frequent Visiting Professor at various academic medical institutions.
A lover of the arts, Dr. Nash played double bass to finance his education and
continued playing professionally in his free time. His focus now is on Health Care Policy,
Biomedical Research Policy, and Water-Energy Nexus Policy, hence his passion for
Integrative Propositional Analysis.
15. Steven E. Wallis, PhD
Dr. Wallis is Director of Meta Analysis at Meaningful Evidence. He has a
decade of experience as an organization development consultant providing
collaborative workshop facilitation, leadership development, and training to
businesses and non-profits in Northern California. Building on that practical
experience, and a systems thinking perspective, he returned to school and earned
his PhD in 2006 at Fielding Graduate University.
Dr. Wallis also works at Capella University – mentoring doctoral candidates.
As director for the Foundation for the Advancement of Social Theory (FAST), he
supports emerging scholars working to identify rigorous paths for improving theory,
policy, and strategic knowledge. An interdisciplinary thinker, his publications cover a
range of fields including ethics, science, management, organizational learning,
entrepreneurship, and policy. His book, Avoiding Policy Failure, shows how a
systems view of policy models can be used to estimate the effectiveness of policies
before implementation, as well as improving policies for reducing cost and improving
results. Recently, Dr. Wallis was appointed to the Fulbright Specialist Roster. The
Fulbright Specialist program supports U.S. scholars in projects to help improve the
capacity of academic institutions outside the United States.
15
16. Bernadette Wright, PhD
I founded Meaningful Evidence, LLC to help leaders accumulate and order data so as
to disclose what effects they are having and why, so they can use that information to improve
their results. I support clients with survey design, data analysis, formative evaluation, impact
evaluation, and report writing. I also provide evaluation design and proposal writing for
grants.
My specialties include ability to solve tough evaluation challenges and to quickly
research and synthesize vast amounts of information. Believing in using whatever research
methods can best answer the questions, I have used a broad range of quantitative research
and qualitative research methods. Examples include survey research, focus groups, literature
reviews, case studies, interviews, and environmental scanning. This experience has covered
long-term care, caregiving, aging in place, Medicaid, assistive technology, health policy, and
many other topics.
Previously, as Consultant at The Lewin Group, I provided research, project
management, and report writing for government, corporate, and nonprofit clients. Before that,
I was at AARP, providing policy analysis and policy research. My PhD is in Public
Policy/Program Evaluation from the University of Maryland.
16
17. The Center for Analysis of Science in Policy
www.scipolicy.org
2014
17
We thank you for your attention