This document summarizes compliance and enforcement trends in Alabama's NPDES (water pollution control) program from 2004-2009. It finds that the percentage of major and non-major NPDES facilities inspected and receiving enforcement actions has declined in recent years. Data reliability for non-major facilities is also a concern. The document recommends reforms to strengthen enforcement of Alabama's water pollution regulations.
20050503 40 Cfr Part 158 Proposed Rule PresentationKaren Warkentien
This document summarizes key points from a presentation on proposed revisions to pesticide data requirements under 40 CFR Part 158. It discusses potential financial implications for registrants and the EPA, including increased study costs and monitoring costs. It also covers proposals regarding confidentiality claims and the codification of environmental fate and ecological effects guidelines that have not been finalized. The presentation urges attendees to submit comments on the proposed rule by the June 9, 2005 deadline.
RADalert - mentorship award winning concept at Hacking Health Vancouver 2014Vivien Lo
RADalert: An app to help radiologists assure quality and continuous improvement by allowing them to track patients throughout the diagnostic process
#HHVan2014
Credits: Dr. Jeff Hu (concept), Georgina Chaplin, Vivien Lo, Gareth Cj. Wee
With help from: Pat Wrigley, Pat Hennessy, Hacking Health Vancouver 2014 mentors, and Vancouver health care professionals
Dr. Jack Shere - Current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) UpdateJohn Blue
Current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) Update - Dr. Jack Shere, Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services (VS), Chief Veterinary Officer, USDA, from the 2018 NIAA Annual Conference, Livestock Traceability: Opportunities for Animal Agriculture, plus the Traceability and the Real World Interactive Workshop, April 10 - 12, Denver, CO, USA.
More presentations at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeUDeS810OcOfuEYwj1oHKQ
20051116 40 Cfr Part 158 For Cpda Registration 201Karen Warkentien
The document summarizes a presentation on proposed revisions to 40 CFR Part 158, which establishes pesticide data requirements. Some key points include: (1) the proposals would comprehensively reorganize and expand the part to incorporate new testing guidelines; (2) this may significantly increase costs for registrants and the EPA beyond the EPA's estimates; and (3) over 100 public comments were received raising concerns about the scope of the increased requirements and financial implications. The presentation examines the proposals and their potential regulatory and economic impacts in more detail.
The document discusses the dangers of synthetic drugs like K2/Spice and bath salts. It covers how these drugs affect the body, their toxicity, and potential for dependency. The document includes citations to various sources on the risks of synthetic drugs and the challenges they pose compared to natural drugs.
Dr. Jack Shere - Step by Step Protocol of Disease TraceabilityJohn Blue
Step by Step Protocol of Disease Traceability - Dr. Jack Shere, Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services (VS), Chief Veterinary Officer, USDA, from the 2018 NIAA Annual Conference, Livestock Traceability: Opportunities for Animal Agriculture, plus the Traceability and the Real World Interactive Workshop, April 10 - 12, Denver, CO, USA.
More presentations at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeUDeS810OcOfuEYwj1oHKQ
The document discusses stakeholders relevant to Southwest Airlines, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of Transportation, suppliers, and oversight committees. It notes issues Southwest faced with the FAA, such as being accused of falsifying a safety report and having a too-cozy relationship. Problems are also described with suppliers providing faulty parts and untrained employees due to ineffective oversight. Southwest was fined by the FAA and took steps to address these issues by increasing oversight of suppliers and allowing more FAA access.
20050503 40 Cfr Part 158 Proposed Rule PresentationKaren Warkentien
This document summarizes key points from a presentation on proposed revisions to pesticide data requirements under 40 CFR Part 158. It discusses potential financial implications for registrants and the EPA, including increased study costs and monitoring costs. It also covers proposals regarding confidentiality claims and the codification of environmental fate and ecological effects guidelines that have not been finalized. The presentation urges attendees to submit comments on the proposed rule by the June 9, 2005 deadline.
RADalert - mentorship award winning concept at Hacking Health Vancouver 2014Vivien Lo
RADalert: An app to help radiologists assure quality and continuous improvement by allowing them to track patients throughout the diagnostic process
#HHVan2014
Credits: Dr. Jeff Hu (concept), Georgina Chaplin, Vivien Lo, Gareth Cj. Wee
With help from: Pat Wrigley, Pat Hennessy, Hacking Health Vancouver 2014 mentors, and Vancouver health care professionals
Dr. Jack Shere - Current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) UpdateJohn Blue
Current Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) Update - Dr. Jack Shere, Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services (VS), Chief Veterinary Officer, USDA, from the 2018 NIAA Annual Conference, Livestock Traceability: Opportunities for Animal Agriculture, plus the Traceability and the Real World Interactive Workshop, April 10 - 12, Denver, CO, USA.
More presentations at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeUDeS810OcOfuEYwj1oHKQ
20051116 40 Cfr Part 158 For Cpda Registration 201Karen Warkentien
The document summarizes a presentation on proposed revisions to 40 CFR Part 158, which establishes pesticide data requirements. Some key points include: (1) the proposals would comprehensively reorganize and expand the part to incorporate new testing guidelines; (2) this may significantly increase costs for registrants and the EPA beyond the EPA's estimates; and (3) over 100 public comments were received raising concerns about the scope of the increased requirements and financial implications. The presentation examines the proposals and their potential regulatory and economic impacts in more detail.
The document discusses the dangers of synthetic drugs like K2/Spice and bath salts. It covers how these drugs affect the body, their toxicity, and potential for dependency. The document includes citations to various sources on the risks of synthetic drugs and the challenges they pose compared to natural drugs.
Dr. Jack Shere - Step by Step Protocol of Disease TraceabilityJohn Blue
Step by Step Protocol of Disease Traceability - Dr. Jack Shere, Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services (VS), Chief Veterinary Officer, USDA, from the 2018 NIAA Annual Conference, Livestock Traceability: Opportunities for Animal Agriculture, plus the Traceability and the Real World Interactive Workshop, April 10 - 12, Denver, CO, USA.
More presentations at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeUDeS810OcOfuEYwj1oHKQ
The document discusses stakeholders relevant to Southwest Airlines, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of Transportation, suppliers, and oversight committees. It notes issues Southwest faced with the FAA, such as being accused of falsifying a safety report and having a too-cozy relationship. Problems are also described with suppliers providing faulty parts and untrained employees due to ineffective oversight. Southwest was fined by the FAA and took steps to address these issues by increasing oversight of suppliers and allowing more FAA access.
Online SAE reporting by CDSCO//Effective from 14/Mar/2021 Anupam Bendre
This document provides information on serious adverse event (SAE) reporting for clinical trials registered both online and offline on the SUGAM portal in India. It discusses what constitutes an SAE, general SAE reporting policies including timeframes and recipients of reports, the process for sites and sponsors to report SAEs online through the portal, and offline reporting procedures. It also describes the e-Vartalaap communication facility available on the portal to contact officials.
Restrictive Collaboration : One States StoryLori Lioce
1) The document discusses restrictive collaboration laws for nurse practitioners (NPs) in Alabama, including requirements that NPs have 10% on-site supervision by a physician and a 1:3 ratio for physician to NP collaboration.
2) Statistics on NPs in Alabama show there are far fewer NPs per capita in Alabama compared to the US overall, and many rural areas are underserved.
3) The document outlines strategies for Alabama NPs to advocate for less restrictive collaboration laws, including educating the public and legislators, building coalitions, and participating in the political process.
This document summarizes data from three studies on approach and landing accidents between 1980-1997. It found that the most common types of accidents were controlled flight into terrain, loss of control, landing overruns, and unstabilized approaches. Common causal factors included procedural violations, lack of situational awareness, and continuing an unstabilized approach rather than initiating a go-around. The summary provides recommendations such as improving standard operating procedures, crew resource management, and flight operations management.
This document summarizes new EPA requirements for obtaining NPDES permits for pesticide applications made to U.S. waters under the Clean Water Act. It notes that EPA has never before required permits for pesticide use regulated under FIFRA. It outlines the permit application process and monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting requirements Georgia mosquito control programs will need to comply with. It also discusses legislative efforts to obtain a regulatory fix exempting public health pesticide applications from needing an NPDES permit.
Dr. Sunny Geiser-Novotny - APHIS VS Vision/Assessment/Priority for ADT/USDA U...John Blue
The document discusses the USDA's Animal Disease Traceability program and next steps. It provides an update on the program's Traceability Performance Measures and successes/challenges. Key challenges include the limited official ID requirement, exemptions, reliance on visual tags, and exclusion of beef feeders. Regional stakeholder meetings will provide feedback to develop recommendations for advancing traceability. A working group will evaluate gaps and provide options to strengthen the program.
Ilhem Hamouda is an executive assistant seeking a new opportunity. She has over 5 years of experience as an executive assistant and paralegal in San Diego, California, providing support to partners at a law firm. Her skills include organization, time management, prioritizing tasks, attention to detail, and being multilingual. She is currently located in London, England.
The document discusses requirements for obtaining reimbursement from FEMA for increased mosquito control costs following a disaster. It emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation, including 3 years of mosquito surveillance data, operational records, and proof of increased control efforts and costs. Proper record keeping is vital to demonstrating that additional funding is needed to address higher mosquito levels beyond local/state capacity.
This personal learning plan outlines a student's academic goals and capabilities. It includes sections about the student's background, subjects, strengths and areas for improvement. The plan also provides learning tools like a short term planner, weekly study schedule, research guide and list of people who can provide academic support.
Glasford International (Moscow) (Metropolis) is an executive search and recruitment organisation which covers all major industries and has the largest personnel search network in the territory of the former USSR, with 55 offices around Russia and the CIS.
La prostitución se define como la explotación de la sexualidad de una persona con fines económicos a través del uso de su cuerpo para ofrecer servicios sexuales. Más de 1 millón de mujeres en Colombia y una de cada 4 mujeres en Bogotá que se dedican a la prostitución son menores de 18 años. Aunque la prostitución de mujeres es la más conocida, también hay un número cada vez mayor de hombres y niños que se dedican a la prostitución.
Team TitanBot's mission is to inspire young people to pursue careers in science and technology through participation in the FIRST Robotics Competition. As a high school robotics team, they build and program robots to compete while also gaining skills in STEAM fields. They provide community outreach through mentoring other teams and participating in local charitable activities. Moving forward, their goals include continuing competition, expanding robotics opportunities to more local schools, and establishing a new rookie high school team.
Karen Bergstrom has over 25 years of experience in graphic design and print production management. She has worked with many clients to design logos, brochures, packaging, websites, and advertisements. Bergstrom's skills include programs like Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. She prides herself on creative solutions, meeting tight deadlines, and ensuring high quality final products.
Este documento resume el contenido y propósito del libro de los Hechos. Explica que narra la historia de la iglesia primitiva desde la ascensión de Cristo hasta el encarcelamiento de Pablo en Roma, mostrando cómo el evangelio se extendió por todo el mundo impulsado por el Espíritu Santo a través de los apóstoles y primeros cristianos. También analiza las fuentes que utilizó Lucas para escribir de forma ordenada esta historia.
Frog and Toad went on an adventure exploring a cave as a healthy family activity for May Day. While in the cave, they came across an anonymous drawing left by a previous visitor. Frog thought the drawing was of a flower, while Toad believed it depicted a monster. They debated over the drawing's meaning until more visitors arrived and helped settle their friendly debate, leaving both Frog and Toad satisfied.
Gus and his Grandpa try to teach Gus how to ride a two-wheeled bike without training wheels. Despite several failed attempts that leave both of them rattled and defeated, Gus persists and is eventually able to master riding the bike, leaving him and his Grandpa jubilant at his accomplishment.
Glasford International is a global executive search firm with over 250 consultants in 50 offices across 35 countries. It provides executive recruitment solutions tailored to clients' needs in key industries like manufacturing, telecom, banking, retail, and healthcare. Glasford aims to exceed client expectations through a systematic search process, developing long-term relationships, and leveraging the experiences of its consultants and partners around the world.
La prostitución se define como la explotación de la sexualidad de una persona con fines económicos a través del uso de su cuerpo para ofrecer servicios sexuales. Más de 1 millón de mujeres en Colombia y una de cada 4 mujeres en Santa Fe de Bogotá que se dedican a la prostitución son menores de 18 años. Aunque la prostitución ejercida por mujeres es la más conocida, también hay un número cada vez mayor de hombres y niños que se prostituyen.
The document discusses the radio industry in India. It provides details on the number of private FM stations and All India Radio. It describes radio as a cost-effective medium for advertisers. The document also outlines the operational structure of radio organizations and discusses the phases of growth for private radio in India from 2000 to the present. It covers topics like radio programming, the programming team, targeting audiences, and major players in the radio market in India.
Online SAE reporting by CDSCO//Effective from 14/Mar/2021 Anupam Bendre
This document provides information on serious adverse event (SAE) reporting for clinical trials registered both online and offline on the SUGAM portal in India. It discusses what constitutes an SAE, general SAE reporting policies including timeframes and recipients of reports, the process for sites and sponsors to report SAEs online through the portal, and offline reporting procedures. It also describes the e-Vartalaap communication facility available on the portal to contact officials.
Restrictive Collaboration : One States StoryLori Lioce
1) The document discusses restrictive collaboration laws for nurse practitioners (NPs) in Alabama, including requirements that NPs have 10% on-site supervision by a physician and a 1:3 ratio for physician to NP collaboration.
2) Statistics on NPs in Alabama show there are far fewer NPs per capita in Alabama compared to the US overall, and many rural areas are underserved.
3) The document outlines strategies for Alabama NPs to advocate for less restrictive collaboration laws, including educating the public and legislators, building coalitions, and participating in the political process.
This document summarizes data from three studies on approach and landing accidents between 1980-1997. It found that the most common types of accidents were controlled flight into terrain, loss of control, landing overruns, and unstabilized approaches. Common causal factors included procedural violations, lack of situational awareness, and continuing an unstabilized approach rather than initiating a go-around. The summary provides recommendations such as improving standard operating procedures, crew resource management, and flight operations management.
This document summarizes new EPA requirements for obtaining NPDES permits for pesticide applications made to U.S. waters under the Clean Water Act. It notes that EPA has never before required permits for pesticide use regulated under FIFRA. It outlines the permit application process and monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting requirements Georgia mosquito control programs will need to comply with. It also discusses legislative efforts to obtain a regulatory fix exempting public health pesticide applications from needing an NPDES permit.
Dr. Sunny Geiser-Novotny - APHIS VS Vision/Assessment/Priority for ADT/USDA U...John Blue
The document discusses the USDA's Animal Disease Traceability program and next steps. It provides an update on the program's Traceability Performance Measures and successes/challenges. Key challenges include the limited official ID requirement, exemptions, reliance on visual tags, and exclusion of beef feeders. Regional stakeholder meetings will provide feedback to develop recommendations for advancing traceability. A working group will evaluate gaps and provide options to strengthen the program.
Ilhem Hamouda is an executive assistant seeking a new opportunity. She has over 5 years of experience as an executive assistant and paralegal in San Diego, California, providing support to partners at a law firm. Her skills include organization, time management, prioritizing tasks, attention to detail, and being multilingual. She is currently located in London, England.
The document discusses requirements for obtaining reimbursement from FEMA for increased mosquito control costs following a disaster. It emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation, including 3 years of mosquito surveillance data, operational records, and proof of increased control efforts and costs. Proper record keeping is vital to demonstrating that additional funding is needed to address higher mosquito levels beyond local/state capacity.
This personal learning plan outlines a student's academic goals and capabilities. It includes sections about the student's background, subjects, strengths and areas for improvement. The plan also provides learning tools like a short term planner, weekly study schedule, research guide and list of people who can provide academic support.
Glasford International (Moscow) (Metropolis) is an executive search and recruitment organisation which covers all major industries and has the largest personnel search network in the territory of the former USSR, with 55 offices around Russia and the CIS.
La prostitución se define como la explotación de la sexualidad de una persona con fines económicos a través del uso de su cuerpo para ofrecer servicios sexuales. Más de 1 millón de mujeres en Colombia y una de cada 4 mujeres en Bogotá que se dedican a la prostitución son menores de 18 años. Aunque la prostitución de mujeres es la más conocida, también hay un número cada vez mayor de hombres y niños que se dedican a la prostitución.
Team TitanBot's mission is to inspire young people to pursue careers in science and technology through participation in the FIRST Robotics Competition. As a high school robotics team, they build and program robots to compete while also gaining skills in STEAM fields. They provide community outreach through mentoring other teams and participating in local charitable activities. Moving forward, their goals include continuing competition, expanding robotics opportunities to more local schools, and establishing a new rookie high school team.
Karen Bergstrom has over 25 years of experience in graphic design and print production management. She has worked with many clients to design logos, brochures, packaging, websites, and advertisements. Bergstrom's skills include programs like Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign. She prides herself on creative solutions, meeting tight deadlines, and ensuring high quality final products.
Este documento resume el contenido y propósito del libro de los Hechos. Explica que narra la historia de la iglesia primitiva desde la ascensión de Cristo hasta el encarcelamiento de Pablo en Roma, mostrando cómo el evangelio se extendió por todo el mundo impulsado por el Espíritu Santo a través de los apóstoles y primeros cristianos. También analiza las fuentes que utilizó Lucas para escribir de forma ordenada esta historia.
Frog and Toad went on an adventure exploring a cave as a healthy family activity for May Day. While in the cave, they came across an anonymous drawing left by a previous visitor. Frog thought the drawing was of a flower, while Toad believed it depicted a monster. They debated over the drawing's meaning until more visitors arrived and helped settle their friendly debate, leaving both Frog and Toad satisfied.
Gus and his Grandpa try to teach Gus how to ride a two-wheeled bike without training wheels. Despite several failed attempts that leave both of them rattled and defeated, Gus persists and is eventually able to master riding the bike, leaving him and his Grandpa jubilant at his accomplishment.
Glasford International is a global executive search firm with over 250 consultants in 50 offices across 35 countries. It provides executive recruitment solutions tailored to clients' needs in key industries like manufacturing, telecom, banking, retail, and healthcare. Glasford aims to exceed client expectations through a systematic search process, developing long-term relationships, and leveraging the experiences of its consultants and partners around the world.
La prostitución se define como la explotación de la sexualidad de una persona con fines económicos a través del uso de su cuerpo para ofrecer servicios sexuales. Más de 1 millón de mujeres en Colombia y una de cada 4 mujeres en Santa Fe de Bogotá que se dedican a la prostitución son menores de 18 años. Aunque la prostitución ejercida por mujeres es la más conocida, también hay un número cada vez mayor de hombres y niños que se prostituyen.
The document discusses the radio industry in India. It provides details on the number of private FM stations and All India Radio. It describes radio as a cost-effective medium for advertisers. The document also outlines the operational structure of radio organizations and discusses the phases of growth for private radio in India from 2000 to the present. It covers topics like radio programming, the programming team, targeting audiences, and major players in the radio market in India.
The document discusses the proposed design and content flow for a new website. It outlines the stylesheets, page layout, and different sections including headers, featured content areas, navigation bars, and tabbed browsing of content channels. It provides examples of similar elements on other websites and proposes an initial focus on Carnatic music content, with plans to expand to additional performing arts, festivals, fashion, and food content going forward.
Glasford International is a global executive search firm with over 330 consultants and researchers in over 50 offices across 35 countries. They have experienced rapid growth, especially in Asia-Pacific and the Americas. The network is structured as independently owned companies that drive business performance and benefit each other through knowledge sharing and cross-border assignments. Managing an international network requires coordinating different cultures and local expectations. Networks offer more flexibility and support than single firms.
The document discusses the radio industry in India. It provides details on the number of private FM stations and All India Radio. It describes radio as a cost-effective medium for advertisers. The document also outlines the operational structure of radio organizations and discusses the phases of growth for private radio in India from 2000 to the present. It covers topics like radio programming, the programming team, targeting audiences, and major players in the radio market in India.
Billion Dollar Bugs: When and How to Test a SpreadsheetTechWell
Gregory Pope from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory presented on spreadsheet errors and testing. Some key points:
1) Several high-profile spreadsheet errors have cost companies and organizations billions of dollars due to things like missing minus signs, cut-and-paste errors, and incorrect formulas. Independent checks of spreadsheets are critical to avoid costly mistakes.
2) Studies show that even "finished" spreadsheets have error rates around 40-70%, which is 10 times higher than software error rates. However, spreadsheets are often not rigorously tested due to a lack of testing culture and skills.
3) Sarbanes-Oxley regulations require top management to certify the accuracy of financial information, increasing the need
This document provides guidance on best practices for root cause investigations of failures in aerospace systems. It outlines several key reasons root cause investigations sometimes miss the true underlying causes, such as incorrect team composition, bias toward early hypotheses, and lack of management support for thorough investigation. The document advocates for collecting objective evidence, considering all potential causes, and not rushing to judgment. It also provides an overview of the initial steps in a root cause investigation, from preserving the failure scene to defining the problem to selecting analysis methods. The goal is to help investigation teams identify definitive root causes to prevent future recurrences of failures.
EPA New Rules Governing Air Pollution Standards for Hydraulic FracturingMarcellus Drilling News
New rules (40 CFR Part 63) issued by the Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday, April 18 that will govern air pollution standards at oil and gas drilling operations, in particular at well sites using hydraulic fracturing (fracking). The EPA claims that the new standards will mean drillers will capture more gas that currently "leaks" into the atmosphere during drilling completions, and that the extra gas can be sold to offset the cost of new equipment and procedures required under the regulations.
Report: Enhanced EPA Oversight and Action Can Further Protect Water Resources...Marcellus Drilling News
A report from the U.S. EPA Inspector General's office saying even though the EPA's own 4-year study proves fracking doesn't affect water supplies, the EPA should try to keep its hand in regulating water used in the fracking business.
Cozad, David, U.S. EPA Region 7, EPA Enforcement and Next Generation Complian...Kevin Perry
The document discusses the EPA's Next Generation Compliance strategy, which aims to modernize environmental enforcement and promote compliance through more effective rules, advanced monitoring technologies, electronic reporting, and increased transparency. Some key aspects of the strategy include using real-time monitoring to detect pollution issues early, developing innovative monitoring tools, transitioning to electronic reporting systems to reduce burden and increase data access, and leveraging transparency of compliance information to drive improved performance. The strategy also explores incorporating Next Generation approaches into enforcement settlements by including advanced monitoring or public reporting requirements.
EPA Proposed Amendments to Air Regulations for the Oil and Natural Gas Indust...Marcellus Drilling News
A full copy of the proposed new rule changes EPA is proposing to prevent air pollution from hydraulic fracturing used in the oil and gas industry. The new rule changes seek to reduce the level of volatile organic compounds the EPA says are escaping into the air around drilling operations--from well pads, compressor plants, pipelines and other industry-related activities.
David Cozad, US EPA Region 7, EPA Enforcement and Next Generation Compliance,...Kevin Perry
The document discusses challenges with environmental compliance and enforcement due to factors like declining budgets and information gaps. It proposes that advances in monitoring technologies can help address these challenges by making pollution more visible in real-time, informing the public and driving compliance through transparency. Specifically, it describes how next generation compliance tools like advanced electronic monitoring, reporting and transparency measures have been included in EPA enforcement actions and regulations to modernize compliance.
The Use of EDC in Canadian Clinical TrialsKhaled El Emam
Presentation at CHEO Research Rounds on a study to estimate the proportion of Canadian clinical trials that are using an Electronic Data Capture system during the period 2006-2007.
Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals and Mixtures; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulem...Marcellus Drilling News
A notice from the federal EPA that they intend to craft new regulations requiring something already being done voluntarily--reporting of the chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing for every well drilled in the U.S. The new rule is a naked attempt at regulating oil and gas drilling in the U.s. by the federal government--something specifically left to the individual states to regulate under the U.S. Constitution. It is just one of the many attempts at violating the Constitution made by the EPA under the odious Obama administration.
Setting the supply chain standard slide shareKristal Snider
Kristal Snider from ERAI Inc discusses strategies for setting supply chain standards to prevent counterfeit electronic parts. ERAI provides data on counterfeiting incidents and parts most often counterfeited. New SAE standards on counterfeit electronic parts control plans include requirements for purchasing, material control, and reporting. Attendees can receive an offer for an ERAI BOM analysis to identify part risks.
Jennifer LaFleur presents at the Reynolds Center's Washington, D.C. workshop, "What's Next for the Economy in Your Town." For more information, please visit http://businessjournalism.org.
Digital Health Devices and Clinical Trials – Wearables Crash Course Webinar S...Epstein Becker Green
Epstein Becker Green Webinar with Attorney Daniel G. Gottlieb - Wearables Crash Course Webinar Series - June 14, 2016.
Wearables can collect valuable data in clinical trials. However, there is not a lot of clarity on how wearables are regulated. This session will help you understand why this uncertainty exists and provide you with strategies for navigating these muddy regulatory waters.
See http://www.ebglaw.com/events/digital-health-devices-and-clinical-trials-wearables-crash-course-webinar-series/
These materials have been provided for informational purposes only and are not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. The content of these materials is copyrighted to Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.
Continuous Monitoring for Web Application SecurityCenzic
In a world with constantly changing and increasingly complex attacks on web applications, security practices are evolving to stay ahead of the threats. Dave Shackleford, IANS Research application security faculty member, and Bala Venkat, Cenzic CMO, explain how government agencies can benefit from continuous security monitoring.
These are the slides from "Continuous Monitoring for Web App Security," a Cenzic and IANS webinar that originally aired on 10 September 2013. The video recording is available at info.cenzic.com (free, registration required).
In the webinar, Dave and Bala discuss the types of attacks currently seen in the wild, what attackers are focused on, and how they are compromising web applications, systems and data. We'll explore the most pressing compliance and regulatory challenges for government agencies and commercial businesses. Finally, we'll show how continuous monitoring tactics and tools can improve your security posture.
The document discusses integrating air quality and pollution data from different sources using standards-based networking approaches. It describes the DataFed system, which allows non-intrusive integration of diverse data types from local, regional and global sources through web services and reusable components. The summary highlights that DataFed has been applied to EPA policy and science needs but more collaboration is still needed to fully connect heterogeneous data sources and enable new insights.
This report analyzes renewable energy supply conditions in the Western US after states meet their renewable portfolio standard requirements by 2025. It finds that significant wind, solar, and geothermal resources will remain undeveloped after 2025. The best remaining resources will depend on location, transmission access, and cost-effective integration into the generation mix. While many factors could affect future policies, the report aims to characterize renewable resources likely available after 2025 to inform long-term planning discussions beyond just meeting RPS targets.
This report analyzes renewable energy supply conditions in the Western United States after states meet their renewable portfolio standard requirements by 2025. It finds that significant wind, solar, and geothermal resources will remain undeveloped after 2025 depending on transmission availability and costs. The report aims to inform long-term planning discussions by characterizing the renewable resources that could be available beyond current RPS targets, though it acknowledges many factors may affect future energy policies.
This report analyzes renewable energy supply conditions in the Western United States after states meet their renewable portfolio standard requirements by 2025. It finds that significant wind, solar, and geothermal resources will remain undeveloped after 2025 depending on transmission availability and costs. The report aims to inform long-term planning discussions by characterizing the renewable resources that could be available beyond current RPS targets, though it acknowledges many factors may affect future energy policies.
This report analyzes renewable energy supply conditions in the Western US after states meet their renewable portfolio standard requirements by 2025. It finds that significant wind, solar, and geothermal resources will remain undeveloped after 2025. The best remaining resources will depend on location, transmission access, and cost-effective integration into the generation mix. While many factors could affect future policies, the report aims to characterize renewable resources likely available after 2025 to inform long-term planning discussions beyond just meeting RPS targets.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyTomaz Bratanic
GraphRAG for life science domain, where you retriever information from biomedical knowledge graphs using LLMs to increase the accuracy and performance of generated answers
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
N P D E S Report
1. COMPLIANCE & ENFORCEMENT IN THE ALABAMA NPDES (WATER POLLUTION CONTROL) PROGRAM ADEM REFORM COALITION August 21, 2009 Disturbing Negative Trends LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. LUDDER A Professional Limited Liability Company
2. Define Mission: Assure for all citizens of the State a safe, healthful and productive environment Commission: Promulgate rules and develop policies that will fulfill the mission Department: Ensure compliance with rules and implement policies that will fulfill the mission Achieve Mission
3. Source Data Reliability EPA Permit Compliance System (PCS or ECHO) Majors – High Reliability Non-majors – 44% DMRs Entered (FY2008) 79% Limits Accurate (FY2008) EPA Annual Noncompliance Report (ANCR) Majors – High Reliability Non-majors – High Reliability, Partial Data 35% Facilities Reviewed (CY2004) 42% Facilities Reviewed (CY2005) 50% Facilities Reviewed (CY2006) 51% Facilities Reviewed (CY2007) ADEM Enforcement Actions Orders – High Reliability Penalties – High Reliability NOVs – Not Available
4. Significant transitional events April 1, 2008 ADEM Reorganization January 1, 2008 Revised Compliance & Enforcement Strategy February 2, 2005 New ADEM Director
5. Percent of NPDES Major Facilities Inspected Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
6. Percent of NPDES Major Facilities in Significant Non-compliance Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
7. Percent of NPDES Major Facilities with Discharge Monitoring Report Violations Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
8. Number of Informal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Major Facilities Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
9. Number of Informal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Major Facilities Source: Permit Compliance System Search for Informal Enforcement Actions (Code: 03), http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/code_expansion.query_form
10. Number of NPDES Major Facilities Receiving Informal Enforcement Actions Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
11. Number of Formal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Major Facilities Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
12. Number of NPDES Major Facilities Receiving Formal Enforcement Actions Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
13. Percent of Major NPDES Facilities Without Timely Enforcement Action Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
14. Percent of NPDES Non-Major Individual Permit Facilities Inspected Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
15. Percent of NPDES Non-major General Permit Facilities Inspected Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
16. Percent of Other NPDES Facilities Inspected Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
17. Percent of NPDES Non-major Facilities in Non-compliance Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
18. Percent of NPDES Non-major Facilities in Category I Non-compliance Source: Annual Non-Compliance Reports (U.S. EPA, 2004-2007), http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/reports/performance/cwa/cwa-npdes-non-majors-2007.pdf; http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/docs/ANCR%20Final%20Report%20CY2006.pdf; http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/info/ANCR0405.1-16-07final.pdf.
20. Non-receipt of Discharge Monitoring Reports From NPDES Non-major Facilities Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
21. Number of Informal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Non-major Facilities Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
22. Number of Informal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Non-major Facilities Source: Permit Compliance System Search for Informal Enforcement Actions (Code: 03), http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/code_expansion.query_form
23. Number of NPDES Non-major Facilities Receiving Informal Enforcement Actions Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
24. Number of Formal Enforcement Actions Taken Against NPDES Non-major Facilities Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
25. Number of NPDES Non-major Facilities Receiving Formal Enforcement Actions Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
26. Percent of NPDES Facilities With Unresolved Compliance Schedule Violations Source: State Review Framework, CWA State Trends Report (U.S. EPA, 7/2/09), http://www.epa-echo.gov/echo/cwa/data/AL.html#5
27. ADEM Administrative Orders Mining/Non-point Source/Surface Water Source: ADEM Order Indexes (2004-2009) http://www.enviro-lawyer.com/ADEM-AOs.html
28. Notices of Violation Mining/Non-point Source/Surface Water “ Rule 335-1-1-.06 (4) states – ‘Records will not be created by compiling selected items from other documents at the request of a member of the public, nor will records be created to provide the requester with data such as ratios, proportions, percentages, frequency distribution, trends, correlations or comparisons except as necessary to administer the Act.’” Source: July 28, 2009 ADEM e-mail response to July 19, 2009 request for historical information on Notices of Violation for NPDES program alone and All programs combined. Info desired, in chronological order, are: date of issuance (FY2005 to present), permittee, facility, permit number.
29. ADEM Administrative Penalties Mining/Non-point Source/Surface Water Source: ADEM Order Indexes (2004-2009) http://www.enviro-lawyer.com/ADEM-AOs.html
The inspections which are included in this metric are high level inspections such as Compliance Evaluations Inspections (CEIs) or Compliance Sampling Inspections (CSIs). Reconnaissance inspections are also included, as long as the facility is not a primary industry (e.g., one subject to effluent guidelines), a municipal permittee with an approved pretreatment program, or a major permittee which has been in SNC during the year. Since this is a coverage measure, the number of facilities inspected, rather than the total number of inspections, are counted. When a facility has been inspected multiple times in one year, only the first inspection is counted. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric calculates the active NPDES major facilities in SNC as a percent of the universe of active NPDES major facilities. This metric is a review indicator metric that allows EPA to measure the success of the NPDES program. SNC data for major facilities is required to be reported to the national data system. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state. Significant Noncompliance (SNC) (majors only): The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program uses the term SNC. SNC designations are made in accordance with the December 12, 1996 guidance document: A General Design for SNC Redefinition Enhancement in PCS. Most SNC designations are based on an automated analysis of Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) that facilities with NPDES permits are required to submit on a monthly basis. The compliance designation of a facility in the PCS/ICIS-NPDES database is done using a mathematical formula that takes into account the amount, duration, and frequency of discharges in comparison with permit levels. In some instances facilities may be manually designated as SNC, even if the PCS/ICIS-NPDES data system does not automatically designate them as such. Examples of events that could result in the manual generation of a SNC code for a facility include: unauthorized discharges; failure of a POTW to enforce its approved pretreatment program; failure to meet a construction deadline; failure to file a DMR; filing a DMR more than 30 days late; or violating any judicial or administrative order. Manually entered compliance data, if present, override machine-generated compliance data. A facility may have multiple discharge points and different designations for each point. If any of these points show a SNC type code, then the overall facility status is listed as SNC, even if other discharge points are in compliance. Removal of the SNC designation occurs once the facility's DMR reports show a consistent pattern of compliance with permit limits, or if EPA or a state agency issues a formal enforcement order to address the violations that resulted in the SNC designation.
This metric assesses the degree to which DMR data are being correctly entered into PCS/ICIS-NPDES. A list of facilities with such violations is provided with the data metric. The number of facilities listed should be divided by the universe of major permittees to derive a percentage. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the total number of state informal enforcement actions issued to NPDES major facilities Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This chart reflects the results of a Permit Compliance System (PCS) query for informal enforcement actions (Code: 03) against major facilities. Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the number of NPDES non-major facilities which received informal enforcement actions. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state. Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the total number of state formal enforcement actions issued to NPDES major facilities. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state. Formal Enforcement Action: Administrative Order, Judicial Action Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the number of NPDES major facilities which received formal enforcement actions. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state. Formal Enforcement Action: Administrative Order, Judicial Action
This metric is a goal metric identifying the percentage of NPDES major facilities with enforcement actions that were not timely to address SNC violations. It provides a percentage derived by summing the number of NPDES major facilities which, for the year under review: - have two or more consecutive quarters of SNC effluent violations at the same pipe and for the same parameter, with no formal enforcement action; or - have two or more consecutive quarters of the same non-effluent SNC violation with no formal enforcement action. Generally, where a facility has not returned to compliance by the time the same SNC violation appears on the second official Quarterly Noncompliance Report (QNCR), then a formal enforcement action must be taken, unless there is supportable justification for an alternative action such as an informal enforcement action or a permit modification. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric evaluates inspection coverage at NPDES non-major facilities with individual permits (excluding those permits which address solely stormwater, pretreatment, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), or Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs)) by measuring the number of facilities inspected, rather than the total number of inspections. In other words, multiple inspections at one facility will count as only one inspection under the selection criteria for this metric. The universe of facilities inspected applies to permittees covered by an individual permit only. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric also evaluates inspection coverage at NPDES non-major facilities with general permits (excluding those permits which address solely stormwater, pretreatment, CAFOs, CSOs, or SSOs) by measuring the number of facilities inspected, rather than the total number of inspections. The universe of facilities inspected applies to permittees covered by a general permit only. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric includes state inspections other than those discussed in Slides 14 and 15.
This metric provides: the noncompliance rate in the national database for NPDES non-major facilities with individual permits. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This charts shows the percentage of NPDES non-major facilities in Category I non-compliance for the respective calendar years. The percentage non-compliance is based on review of a portion of the non-major universe, indicated as a percentage adjacent to the calendar year. Category I Violations (Non-Major Facilities only): The national program database calculates the severity of violations according to the Clean Water Act regulations, which have specific criteria specifying the duration, severity, and type of violations that rise to the level of Significant Noncompliance (SNC). The calculation of Category I Violations is equivalent to the SNC calculations, but because the violations occur at smaller dischargers (non-major), EPA does not classify the violations as "SNC". ECHO distinguishes between "SNC" and Category I because this has a bearing on the government response used to address the violation(s). Repeat SNC occurrences normally are addressed through formal enforcement actions, while Category I Violations are often addressed via informal processes. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This charts shows the percentage of NPDES non-major facilities in non-compliance for the respective calendar years. The percentage non-compliance is based on review of a portion of the non-major universe, indicated as a percentage adjacent to the calendar year. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric provides: the number of facilities in the national database with DMR non-receipt for every quarter in three continuous years. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the total number of state informal enforcement actions issued to NPDES non-major facilities. Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This chart reflects the results of a Permit Compliance System (PCS) query for informal enforcement actions (Code: 03) against non-major facilities. Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the number of NPDES non-major facilities which received informal enforcement actions. Informal Enforcement Actions : Warning Letters, Notices of Violation Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the total number of state formal enforcement actions issued to NPDES non-major facilities. Formal Enforcement Actions : Administrative Orders, Judicial Actions Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
For the fiscal year presented, this metric provides: the number of NPDES non-major facilities which received formal enforcement actions. Formal Enforcement Actions : Administrative Orders, Judicial Actions Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state.
This metric measures the percentage of facilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations, as of the end of the fiscal year. (The universe or denominator is the number of permittees with compliance schedule milestones scheduled to be met in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY)). Compliance schedules are required to be reported to the national data system for major facilities. This data is not currently required for non-major facilities. Major Facility: Any NPDES facility or activity classified as such by the EPA regional administrator, or in the case of approved state programs, the regional administrator in conjunction with the state director. Major municipal dischargers include all facilities with design flows of greater than one million gallons per day and facilities with EPA/state approved industrial pretreatment programs. Major industrial facilities are determined based on specific ratings criteria developed by EPA/state. Non-Major Facility: A facility that is not identified as a Major Facility.
This chart shows the number of administrative orders issued to water pollution facilities.
This chart was intended to show the number of Notices of Violation issued to water pollution facilities.
This chart shows the penalties assessed by administrative orders to water pollution facilities.