This article discusses a report showing that charities are falling behind corporations in their use of the internet, with many charities only using the web for news, links, and email inquiries rather than for cost cutting, online training, or job applications. The charity in the article is asking the government for financial support to help them better exploit the internet, but the government does not view the charity's current internet use as professional enough. The article provides statistics and quotes from experts to argue against the government's stance.

1. Michael McCauley
My review on Article one
This Article is basically informing people about Charities informing the government for
financial support to help them exploit the internet revolution.
This is done through a report which shows that charities are falling behind the corporate
sector in their use of the web.
The report also shows that many charities use the internet for news, links to other web sites
and for email enquiries but few use it for cost cutting, online-training or job applications.
This charity informs their target audience, but the government doesn’t find this to be a
professional way and it’s not used enough to advertise and to help the economy.
In the article you would see a lot of statistics and straight facts back up the Charity in this
Article against the government. For example “The Government is investing £25 million over
three years to help small businesses”; this fact is against the governments finances.
Also in the article it shows peoples comment with what the public think, an effective
comment was from Mr.Saxton mentioned the voluntary sector has a key role in relieving
social exclusion. Through not supporting the sector, the government is helping to create
digital exclusion just as the Internet revolution is beginning." This comment is against the
government.