The document provides a community health assessment of Montgomery County from 2013. It includes sections on demographics, health data, health behaviors, selected health priorities, existing health resources, and next steps. Some key findings are that cancer and heart disease are leading causes of death. Premature death rates meet benchmarks but mental health and low birthweight rates are higher than targets. Reproductive health and prenatal care were identified as priority areas for improvement. The assessment aims to inform future strategic planning and action to address community health needs.
The document provides a summary of a MAPP (Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnership) Community Assessment for Smith County, Texas. It describes the six phases of the MAPP process and assessments conducted in phase 3, including strengths and themes, local public health system, and community health status. Several charts are presented analyzing demographics, causes of death, communicable diseases, and other health indicators, finding areas where Smith County differs from state averages and could improve community health. The assessment will be used to prioritize strategic health issues and develop goals and actions to address them.
Batch 2k19 of the school earned fourth place in the intramurals pep squad competition. They were called the Freshmen Furies and Fresh Minions. There is still outstanding contributions from some students for the intramural funds. Any unused funds will be donated to a first Friday mass in October.
The document also discusses a pork barrel scam involving Janet Lim Napoles and public officials like Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago. Santiago filed a bill to distribute free essential medicines to indigenous people through local health centers, bypassing lawmakers, to address concerns about the pork barrel system and prevent corruption.
This document discusses new legislation around investment advisor registration and compliance programs. It provides the following key points:
- The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 will require most investment advisors to register or reregister with the SEC or states within one year. Some SEC-registered advisors may need to deregister and register in states instead.
- Regulators will require registered advisors to have robust compliance programs to demonstrate strong internal controls and procedures. Many advisors are beginning to implement these programs now.
- Steelbridge Compliance offers services to help advisors meet new registration and compliance requirements through offerings like registration assistance, compliance reviews, and additional services around technology, disaster recovery, and training.
This document provides contact information for over 100 golf courses and country clubs across Florida, including their names, addresses, phone numbers and websites. The golf facilities are listed alphabetically and contact details are provided for their clubhouses, maintenance facilities, and professional shops. This directory aims to help organics generators and processors in Florida identify potential end users for organic materials.
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READERMichael Woyan
This document summarizes an investment opportunity in LakePoint Sporting Community & Town Center, a mixed-use development located near Atlanta, Georgia. It will include world-class sporting facilities projected to attract 6 million annual visitors and $830 million in annual spending. The development has exceeded early projections and proven successful in attracting sports leagues, tenants, and visitors. The document outlines the investment terms, including a $500,000 investment requiring the creation of 2,683 jobs, annual profit distributions, and a clear 5-year exit strategy. It introduces the experienced development team behind the project.
The document provides information about an upcoming event called the Innovations in Diabetes Summit that will be held on July 14 in Minnesota. The summit will highlight advances in diabetes research, treatment, and care from leading organizations in the region. It will also feature panels of patients and experts who will discuss living with diabetes and new approaches. The goal is to connect key players in diabetes innovation and support new developments in prevention, treatment and cures.
The document provides a summary of a MAPP (Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnership) Community Assessment for Smith County, Texas. It describes the six phases of the MAPP process and assessments conducted in phase 3, including strengths and themes, local public health system, and community health status. Several charts are presented analyzing demographics, causes of death, communicable diseases, and other health indicators, finding areas where Smith County differs from state averages and could improve community health. The assessment will be used to prioritize strategic health issues and develop goals and actions to address them.
Batch 2k19 of the school earned fourth place in the intramurals pep squad competition. They were called the Freshmen Furies and Fresh Minions. There is still outstanding contributions from some students for the intramural funds. Any unused funds will be donated to a first Friday mass in October.
The document also discusses a pork barrel scam involving Janet Lim Napoles and public officials like Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago. Santiago filed a bill to distribute free essential medicines to indigenous people through local health centers, bypassing lawmakers, to address concerns about the pork barrel system and prevent corruption.
This document discusses new legislation around investment advisor registration and compliance programs. It provides the following key points:
- The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 will require most investment advisors to register or reregister with the SEC or states within one year. Some SEC-registered advisors may need to deregister and register in states instead.
- Regulators will require registered advisors to have robust compliance programs to demonstrate strong internal controls and procedures. Many advisors are beginning to implement these programs now.
- Steelbridge Compliance offers services to help advisors meet new registration and compliance requirements through offerings like registration assistance, compliance reviews, and additional services around technology, disaster recovery, and training.
This document provides contact information for over 100 golf courses and country clubs across Florida, including their names, addresses, phone numbers and websites. The golf facilities are listed alphabetically and contact details are provided for their clubhouses, maintenance facilities, and professional shops. This directory aims to help organics generators and processors in Florida identify potential end users for organic materials.
Ameriholdings LakePoint Brochure FINAL 3.2.15 hi-res READERMichael Woyan
This document summarizes an investment opportunity in LakePoint Sporting Community & Town Center, a mixed-use development located near Atlanta, Georgia. It will include world-class sporting facilities projected to attract 6 million annual visitors and $830 million in annual spending. The development has exceeded early projections and proven successful in attracting sports leagues, tenants, and visitors. The document outlines the investment terms, including a $500,000 investment requiring the creation of 2,683 jobs, annual profit distributions, and a clear 5-year exit strategy. It introduces the experienced development team behind the project.
The document provides information about an upcoming event called the Innovations in Diabetes Summit that will be held on July 14 in Minnesota. The summit will highlight advances in diabetes research, treatment, and care from leading organizations in the region. It will also feature panels of patients and experts who will discuss living with diabetes and new approaches. The goal is to connect key players in diabetes innovation and support new developments in prevention, treatment and cures.
This document provides a summary of the 2015 Community Health Needs Assessment conducted by Lake Regional Health System. Key findings from the assessment include:
1) The leading causes of death in the community as defined by Camden, Miller, and Morgan counties are heart disease, cancer, and smoking-related illness. Rates of premature death are higher than the state average.
2) Overweight and obesity rates are high, with over one-third of adults considered overweight or obese. This puts residents at risk for other health issues.
3) Through a community survey and focus groups, the top four prioritized health needs were identified as access to primary/specialty care, mental health, smoking/tobacco use,
The document outlines a blueprint for the Mountain States Regional Health Equity Council (RHEC) to address health disparities in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. It discusses regional demographics, health and healthcare disparities, and social determinants of health that disproportionately impact minority groups. The RHEC will work to create health equity in the region through partnerships, prioritizing access to care, disease prevention, and addressing social challenges like poverty, education, and transportation that influence health outcomes. The appendix provides state-specific data and summaries of goals from the National Partnership for Action to address and eliminate health disparities in the Mountain States region.
As a Community Coalition Partnership grantee the San Antonio Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse (SACADA) and the Circles of San Antonio (COSA) Community Coalition have been tasked by Department of State Health Services (DSHS) with developing a needs assessment as part of an overall strategic plan that will be implemented over the next two years. This community needs assessment is a fluid document and subject to revision as our understanding of the data develops, further data becomes available or conditions within the community change.
Hampden CHA Final Report - Final version bTom Taaffe
This document provides a summary of a community health assessment conducted for 12 towns in Hampden County, Massachusetts. It includes surveys of 230 community members, interviews with 67 key informants across the towns, and 12 focus groups. The assessment examines health issues like substance abuse, obesity, mental health, and access to care. It also considers demographic factors and identifies priorities in each town. Overall, the report aims to understand community health conditions, needs, and concerns in order to improve public health outcomes for the region.
2013WAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESS.docxShiraPrater50
This document summarizes a 2013 community health needs assessment conducted collaboratively in Wake County, NC. It provides an executive summary of the assessment and introduces the report's organization. The assessment was a required process for local hospitals and health departments to understand community health status, concerns, resources and develop plans to address priority issues. It involved collecting data through surveys, focus groups and statistics to identify factors influencing health. The goal was to engage the community, agencies and stakeholders to work together on improving community health.
The document provides an overview of a community health improvement plan for Clare and Gladwin Counties in Michigan. It discusses forming a working group to assess health needs, determine priority areas, and set goals. The priority areas identified are: health services, nutrition/weight status, violence, substance abuse, maternal/infant health, and transportation. For each priority, goals and objectives are outlined, such as establishing new primary care clinics, increasing access to health screenings and education, and expanding access to healthy foods through farmers markets. The plan aims to unite partners across the region to improve health in central Michigan.
This document outlines a community health improvement plan for Clare and Gladwin Counties in Michigan. It discusses forming a cross-county health council and county-level working groups to assess local health needs and priorities. The working groups used various health data sources and a community survey to identify priority areas. The top priorities identified were: 1) obesity, nutrition, and physical activity, 2) mental health and substance abuse, and 3) access to healthcare. The document provides goals and current resources for each priority area. It aims to unite the community and improve health through collaborative efforts.
This document summarizes a report by the Multnomah County Health Department on the health impacts of housing in the county. It finds that a shortage of affordable housing is contributing to health problems among low-income residents, such as food insecurity, lack of healthcare access, stress, heat issues, lead poisoning, asthma and other respiratory illnesses. It discusses challenges to improving substandard housing like repair costs, weak housing codes and enforcement. It recommends establishing housing data collection, incorporating health into existing housing efforts, and convening agencies to strengthen policies and mobilize organizations to address these issues.
This document presents the 2016-2020 Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) developed by the Weber-Morgan Health Department in partnership with numerous community organizations. The CHIP identifies three priority health issues for the community - suicide, obesity, and adolescent substance abuse. Strategies and objectives are outlined to guide collaborative efforts over the next three to five years to improve these health indicators, which exceed state and national averages according to a previous Community Health Assessment. The CHIP is intended to mobilize partners and resources in a coordinated way to make Weber and Morgan counties healthier.
This document presents a Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) developed by the Weber-Morgan Health Department in partnership with numerous community organizations from 2016-2020. It identifies suicide, obesity, and adolescent substance abuse as the top three health priorities in Weber and Morgan counties based on data from a 2016 Community Health Assessment. The CHIP was created through a collaborative process involving over 100 community partners to strategically align resources and coordinate efforts to improve these health issues over the next three to five years.
This report analyzes youth suicide data from Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham counties in Michigan. Key findings include:
1) Over 6% of youth reported attempting suicide, meaning about 2 students per classroom of 33.
2) Over 1,400 students (13.1%) reported seriously considering suicide.
3) Female students, especially in middle/high school, reported higher rates of suicidal ideation, planning, and sadness/hopelessness than male students.
4) Lesbian, gay, and bisexual students reported higher rates of suicidal ideation than heterosexual students.
The report makes recommendations for prevention programs targeting individual, community, and systemic levels and incorporating youth input. It also calls
Burnett County, Wisconsin faces several public health challenges including high rates of poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to healthcare. To address these issues, stakeholders have implemented the Healthy Burnett initiative as part of the state's Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 plan. This paper analyzes epidemiological data on Burnett County's demographics, economy, and health outcomes to identify priority areas for public health interventions. The data shows high rates of poverty, low educational attainment, and mental health issues. As a result, the county's public health programs focus on decreasing stigma and improving access to mental healthcare through initiatives targeting individuals, communities, and systems.
This document provides a summary of a 2012 community health assessment conducted across 10 counties in Northern Michigan, including a special focus on Montmorency and Otsego Counties. The assessment was funded by various healthcare organizations and conducted over 15 months using the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) framework. Key findings from the assessment include that residents experience barriers to healthcare access and healthy behaviors related to obesity, physical activity, access to healthy foods and recreation, alcohol and drug use, and tobacco use. The assessment gathered data on over 250 health indicators and identified social and economic factors like lower education levels and income as influencing community health.
The document summarizes a community health assessment conducted in Marquette County, Michigan in 2012. It identifies the top three health priorities as: 1) obesity prevention through healthy living and lifestyle changes, 2) substance abuse prevention including reducing tobacco use, and 3) improving access to health resources. A team consisting of local health departments, hospitals, and other organizations conducted extensive research, data analysis, and input from community members to identify these priorities and develop strategies and initiatives to address them over the next three years.
This document provides an evaluation report of the 2013-2016 Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP 1.0) in Lane County, Oregon. It summarizes the plan's goals of improving health equity, preventing tobacco use and obesity, addressing mental health and substance abuse issues, and enhancing access to care. The report finds that while challenges remain, cross-sector collaboration increased over the three years, public health awareness grew, and accomplishments were made in all five priority areas. It concludes that continued collective action through the 2016-2019 CHIP 2.0 is needed to further reduce health disparities and improve population well-being in Lane County.
This document is a community health status report for Saginaw County, Michigan produced through a partnership between the Saginaw County Department of Public Health and the University of Michigan School of Public Health. The report assesses key health indicators to provide a snapshot of the current health status of Saginaw County residents. It is intended to initiate the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) process and engage the community in identifying health priorities and measuring progress over time. The report finds that more comprehensive data is needed to better understand health issues in specific areas and populations of the county.
5-21-15 Final Community_Health_Assessment_of_North_Central_MASusan Buchholz
This document provides a summary of key findings from a 2015 community health assessment of North Central Massachusetts. It examines the region's demographics, socioeconomic factors, health status, behaviors, and outcomes. Some notable findings include an aging population compared to the state average, uneven population growth across communities, low racial/ethnic diversity with over 90% non-Hispanic white residents, and economic struggles in some areas like income, poverty, and unemployment. The assessment utilized quantitative data from sources like the Census and qualitative input from over 200 community members to understand health issues in the region.
Making What Matters Happen - Organizational Needs Assessment of Toronto's Urb...Susan Mintz
This document provides an overview and summary of a needs assessment study of Toronto's urban health nonprofit community. The study aimed to identify gaps in organizational capacity and priorities for support. It found:
1) The top priority needs for nonprofits were financial development, strategic assistance, and human resources development.
2) Common barriers to staff training included lack of time, funding and backfill positions.
3) The main external challenges nonprofits faced were unstable core funding, contributing to policy development, and issues with salaries/recruitment for human resources.
4) Recommendations included advancing knowledge sharing, staff training, addressing broader structural challenges, and informing public policy.
The document provides information on the Somerset County Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). It discusses the goals of conducting a community health assessment which included gathering health statistics through a survey of over 2,000 county residents. The assessment identified areas of strength and areas for improvement in county health by comparing data to state and national averages. The CHIP was then developed to address priority health issues like maintaining a healthy weight and chronic disease management through goals, objectives and strategies.
This document summarizes the findings and recommendations of the Warren County, Ohio Opioid Reduction Task Force. It provides background on the opioid epidemic in Warren County and Ohio. It then discusses the economic and public health impacts, including increased rates of hepatitis C, HIV, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. The task force identified five priority areas: increasing access to treatment, raising community awareness, prosecuting major drug dealers, developing treatment resource guides, and enhancing naloxone distribution. It recommends initial implementation of these priorities and forming a nonprofit organization and supporting a community coordinator to sustain long-term efforts to address the opioid crisis.
More Related Content
Similar to Montgomery County Community Health Assessment_RPorterNelson-2
This document provides a summary of the 2015 Community Health Needs Assessment conducted by Lake Regional Health System. Key findings from the assessment include:
1) The leading causes of death in the community as defined by Camden, Miller, and Morgan counties are heart disease, cancer, and smoking-related illness. Rates of premature death are higher than the state average.
2) Overweight and obesity rates are high, with over one-third of adults considered overweight or obese. This puts residents at risk for other health issues.
3) Through a community survey and focus groups, the top four prioritized health needs were identified as access to primary/specialty care, mental health, smoking/tobacco use,
The document outlines a blueprint for the Mountain States Regional Health Equity Council (RHEC) to address health disparities in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. It discusses regional demographics, health and healthcare disparities, and social determinants of health that disproportionately impact minority groups. The RHEC will work to create health equity in the region through partnerships, prioritizing access to care, disease prevention, and addressing social challenges like poverty, education, and transportation that influence health outcomes. The appendix provides state-specific data and summaries of goals from the National Partnership for Action to address and eliminate health disparities in the Mountain States region.
As a Community Coalition Partnership grantee the San Antonio Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse (SACADA) and the Circles of San Antonio (COSA) Community Coalition have been tasked by Department of State Health Services (DSHS) with developing a needs assessment as part of an overall strategic plan that will be implemented over the next two years. This community needs assessment is a fluid document and subject to revision as our understanding of the data develops, further data becomes available or conditions within the community change.
Hampden CHA Final Report - Final version bTom Taaffe
This document provides a summary of a community health assessment conducted for 12 towns in Hampden County, Massachusetts. It includes surveys of 230 community members, interviews with 67 key informants across the towns, and 12 focus groups. The assessment examines health issues like substance abuse, obesity, mental health, and access to care. It also considers demographic factors and identifies priorities in each town. Overall, the report aims to understand community health conditions, needs, and concerns in order to improve public health outcomes for the region.
2013WAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESS.docxShiraPrater50
This document summarizes a 2013 community health needs assessment conducted collaboratively in Wake County, NC. It provides an executive summary of the assessment and introduces the report's organization. The assessment was a required process for local hospitals and health departments to understand community health status, concerns, resources and develop plans to address priority issues. It involved collecting data through surveys, focus groups and statistics to identify factors influencing health. The goal was to engage the community, agencies and stakeholders to work together on improving community health.
The document provides an overview of a community health improvement plan for Clare and Gladwin Counties in Michigan. It discusses forming a working group to assess health needs, determine priority areas, and set goals. The priority areas identified are: health services, nutrition/weight status, violence, substance abuse, maternal/infant health, and transportation. For each priority, goals and objectives are outlined, such as establishing new primary care clinics, increasing access to health screenings and education, and expanding access to healthy foods through farmers markets. The plan aims to unite partners across the region to improve health in central Michigan.
This document outlines a community health improvement plan for Clare and Gladwin Counties in Michigan. It discusses forming a cross-county health council and county-level working groups to assess local health needs and priorities. The working groups used various health data sources and a community survey to identify priority areas. The top priorities identified were: 1) obesity, nutrition, and physical activity, 2) mental health and substance abuse, and 3) access to healthcare. The document provides goals and current resources for each priority area. It aims to unite the community and improve health through collaborative efforts.
This document summarizes a report by the Multnomah County Health Department on the health impacts of housing in the county. It finds that a shortage of affordable housing is contributing to health problems among low-income residents, such as food insecurity, lack of healthcare access, stress, heat issues, lead poisoning, asthma and other respiratory illnesses. It discusses challenges to improving substandard housing like repair costs, weak housing codes and enforcement. It recommends establishing housing data collection, incorporating health into existing housing efforts, and convening agencies to strengthen policies and mobilize organizations to address these issues.
This document presents the 2016-2020 Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) developed by the Weber-Morgan Health Department in partnership with numerous community organizations. The CHIP identifies three priority health issues for the community - suicide, obesity, and adolescent substance abuse. Strategies and objectives are outlined to guide collaborative efforts over the next three to five years to improve these health indicators, which exceed state and national averages according to a previous Community Health Assessment. The CHIP is intended to mobilize partners and resources in a coordinated way to make Weber and Morgan counties healthier.
This document presents a Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) developed by the Weber-Morgan Health Department in partnership with numerous community organizations from 2016-2020. It identifies suicide, obesity, and adolescent substance abuse as the top three health priorities in Weber and Morgan counties based on data from a 2016 Community Health Assessment. The CHIP was created through a collaborative process involving over 100 community partners to strategically align resources and coordinate efforts to improve these health issues over the next three to five years.
This report analyzes youth suicide data from Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham counties in Michigan. Key findings include:
1) Over 6% of youth reported attempting suicide, meaning about 2 students per classroom of 33.
2) Over 1,400 students (13.1%) reported seriously considering suicide.
3) Female students, especially in middle/high school, reported higher rates of suicidal ideation, planning, and sadness/hopelessness than male students.
4) Lesbian, gay, and bisexual students reported higher rates of suicidal ideation than heterosexual students.
The report makes recommendations for prevention programs targeting individual, community, and systemic levels and incorporating youth input. It also calls
Burnett County, Wisconsin faces several public health challenges including high rates of poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to healthcare. To address these issues, stakeholders have implemented the Healthy Burnett initiative as part of the state's Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 plan. This paper analyzes epidemiological data on Burnett County's demographics, economy, and health outcomes to identify priority areas for public health interventions. The data shows high rates of poverty, low educational attainment, and mental health issues. As a result, the county's public health programs focus on decreasing stigma and improving access to mental healthcare through initiatives targeting individuals, communities, and systems.
This document provides a summary of a 2012 community health assessment conducted across 10 counties in Northern Michigan, including a special focus on Montmorency and Otsego Counties. The assessment was funded by various healthcare organizations and conducted over 15 months using the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) framework. Key findings from the assessment include that residents experience barriers to healthcare access and healthy behaviors related to obesity, physical activity, access to healthy foods and recreation, alcohol and drug use, and tobacco use. The assessment gathered data on over 250 health indicators and identified social and economic factors like lower education levels and income as influencing community health.
The document summarizes a community health assessment conducted in Marquette County, Michigan in 2012. It identifies the top three health priorities as: 1) obesity prevention through healthy living and lifestyle changes, 2) substance abuse prevention including reducing tobacco use, and 3) improving access to health resources. A team consisting of local health departments, hospitals, and other organizations conducted extensive research, data analysis, and input from community members to identify these priorities and develop strategies and initiatives to address them over the next three years.
This document provides an evaluation report of the 2013-2016 Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP 1.0) in Lane County, Oregon. It summarizes the plan's goals of improving health equity, preventing tobacco use and obesity, addressing mental health and substance abuse issues, and enhancing access to care. The report finds that while challenges remain, cross-sector collaboration increased over the three years, public health awareness grew, and accomplishments were made in all five priority areas. It concludes that continued collective action through the 2016-2019 CHIP 2.0 is needed to further reduce health disparities and improve population well-being in Lane County.
This document is a community health status report for Saginaw County, Michigan produced through a partnership between the Saginaw County Department of Public Health and the University of Michigan School of Public Health. The report assesses key health indicators to provide a snapshot of the current health status of Saginaw County residents. It is intended to initiate the Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) process and engage the community in identifying health priorities and measuring progress over time. The report finds that more comprehensive data is needed to better understand health issues in specific areas and populations of the county.
5-21-15 Final Community_Health_Assessment_of_North_Central_MASusan Buchholz
This document provides a summary of key findings from a 2015 community health assessment of North Central Massachusetts. It examines the region's demographics, socioeconomic factors, health status, behaviors, and outcomes. Some notable findings include an aging population compared to the state average, uneven population growth across communities, low racial/ethnic diversity with over 90% non-Hispanic white residents, and economic struggles in some areas like income, poverty, and unemployment. The assessment utilized quantitative data from sources like the Census and qualitative input from over 200 community members to understand health issues in the region.
Making What Matters Happen - Organizational Needs Assessment of Toronto's Urb...Susan Mintz
This document provides an overview and summary of a needs assessment study of Toronto's urban health nonprofit community. The study aimed to identify gaps in organizational capacity and priorities for support. It found:
1) The top priority needs for nonprofits were financial development, strategic assistance, and human resources development.
2) Common barriers to staff training included lack of time, funding and backfill positions.
3) The main external challenges nonprofits faced were unstable core funding, contributing to policy development, and issues with salaries/recruitment for human resources.
4) Recommendations included advancing knowledge sharing, staff training, addressing broader structural challenges, and informing public policy.
The document provides information on the Somerset County Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). It discusses the goals of conducting a community health assessment which included gathering health statistics through a survey of over 2,000 county residents. The assessment identified areas of strength and areas for improvement in county health by comparing data to state and national averages. The CHIP was then developed to address priority health issues like maintaining a healthy weight and chronic disease management through goals, objectives and strategies.
This document summarizes the findings and recommendations of the Warren County, Ohio Opioid Reduction Task Force. It provides background on the opioid epidemic in Warren County and Ohio. It then discusses the economic and public health impacts, including increased rates of hepatitis C, HIV, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. The task force identified five priority areas: increasing access to treatment, raising community awareness, prosecuting major drug dealers, developing treatment resource guides, and enhancing naloxone distribution. It recommends initial implementation of these priorities and forming a nonprofit organization and supporting a community coordinator to sustain long-term efforts to address the opioid crisis.
Similar to Montgomery County Community Health Assessment_RPorterNelson-2 (20)
2. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 2
Table of Contents
Abstract............................................................................................................................... 3
Section 1: Community Health Assessment Team ............................................................. 4
Section 2: A Glance of Montgomery County..................................................................... 6
Demographics...............................................................................................................................................................6
Population- Age andGender..............................................................................................................................6
Race and Ethnicity.................................................................................................................................................7
Education........................................................................................................................................................................7
Economic Characteristics........................................................................................................................................8
Household Income and Poverty Levels...........................................................................................................8
Section 3: County Health Data........................................................................................... 9
Snapshot of 2013 Health Outcomes for Montgomery County ................................................................9
Pregnancy /Birth Rate...........................................................................................................................................10
Cancer Incidence......................................................................................................................................................10
Mortality Data...........................................................................................................................................................11
Leading Causes of Death...................................................................................................................................11
Morbidity Data..........................................................................................................................................................12
Communicable Diseases .......................................................................................................................................13
HIV.............................................................................................................................................................................13
Gonorrhea, Chlamydia and Primary and Secondary Syphilis............................................................13
Snapshot of 2013 Health Behaviors that Impact Health Outcomes in Montgomery County .14
Section 5: Selected Health Priorities for Montgomery County...................................... 16
Heart Disease and Cancer Prevention............................................................................................................16
Sexually Transmitted Diseases..........................................................................................................................17
Prenatal Care .............................................................................................................................................................18
Section 6: Existing Health Resources for Montgomery County...................................... 20
Hospitals......................................................................................................................................................................20
Health Centers...........................................................................................................................................................20
Prenatal Care .............................................................................................................................................................20
Smoking Cessation ..................................................................................................................................................21
HIV/STD Health Service Agencies....................................................................................................................21
Section 7: Next Steps........................................................................................................ 23
Dissemination Plan .................................................................................................................................................23
Publications...........................................................................................................................................................23
Presentations........................................................................................................................................................23
Action Plan..................................................................................................................................................................24
Heart Disease and Cancer Prevention.........................................................................................................24
Reproductive Health...........................................................................................................................................24
Prenatal Care........................................................................................................................................................25
References........................................................................................................................ 26
3. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 3
Abstract
The purpose of the community health assessment is to conduct a comprehensive
health needs assessment to describe the current health status of Montgomery County. The
goal of the project is to: 1) gather information about the quality of life and overall health
of those whom reside within Montgomery County, 2) report findings to the community
and all other interested in the findings, 3) establish concrete health priorities and agendas,
and 4) develop strategies that will be effective in improving the current and future health
of Montgomery County residents. The process involves the collection and analysis of
data including health statistics, demographics, environmental factors, etc. This document
is a summery of all the current available data and serves as a forefront for the next health
assessment that will take place. This document also serves as a basis for selecting
community health priorities and development of a strategic action plan that can be used to
meet those identified health needs.
4. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 4
Section 1: Community Health Assessment Team
The Montgomery Health Alliance (MCHA) was established in 2005 with the sole
purpose of increasing the awareness of health issues in Montgomery County, while
facilitating access to resources. For the purpose of this community health assessment the
community partnerships and collaborations already developed by the MCHA will be used
as the primary assessment team. The MCHA consists of the following organizations:
Abington Memorial Hospital
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Delaware Valley Health Insurance Trust
Einstein Healthcare Network
Family Services of Montgomery County
Health Promotion Council
Holy Redeemer Health System
Lansdale Hospital
Main Line Health System
Montgomery County Health Department
Montgomery County Medical Society
Montgomery County School Nurses Association
North Penn Commmunity Health Foundation
North Penn Visiting Nurses Association
North Penn YMCA
Paoli Hospital
5. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 5
Penn State Cooperative Extension
The First Twenty
VNA-Community Services
Wissahickon School District
Leading Investigators:
Dr. Joseph M. DiMino
Director of Health/Medical Director
Montgomery County Health Department
Karen E. Konnick
Director of Marketing and Communications
Family Services of Montgomery County
Tinesha Banks, MPH
Deputy Executive Director-Strategic Development
Health Promotion Council
6. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 6
Section 2: A Glance of Montgomery County
Montgomery County is a diverse and historic community located northwest of
Philadelphia County. Montgomery County was originally a part of Philadelphia County
until it became its own county in 1784. Montgomery County is known for its booming
industry and manufacturing companies as well as it rich farmlands. Montgomery County
is the home of 62 municipalities. The 2010 US Census shows the three largest
municipalities in Montgomery County being: Lower Merion Township, Abington
Township, and Cheltenham Township.
Figure 1
Demographics
Population- Age and Gender
The most recent population totals
(2010) shows that Montgomery County
has a population of 799,874. The median
age of residents is 40.6 years of age, with 25.2% of its residents are ages birth to 19 years,
31.1% are ages 20-44 years, 28.5% are ages 45-64 years, and 15.1% are 65 years and
over (Table 1). Males accounted for 48.5% of the county population, while females
represent 51.5% of the counties total population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010).
Table 1
Population by Age and Gender, Montgomery County, 2010
Age Males Females Total
0-19 years 103,081 98,688 201,769 (25.2%)
20-44 years 123,855 125,260 249,115 (31.1%)
45-64 years 110,616 117,647 228,263 (28.5%)
65 and over 50,412 70,315 120,727 (15.1%)
Total 387,964 (48.5%) 411,910 (51.5%) 799,874
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Demographic Profile
7. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 7
The percentage of Montgomery County residents, by age and gender, is similar in
comparison to those for Pennsylvania (Table 2). The median age of Pennsylvania
residents is 40.1 years. Males accounted for 48.7% of the states population, while females
represented 51.3% of the states total populations (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). The
percentages for Montgomery County in comparison to the percentages of the state are
roughly identical.
Table 2
Population by Age and Gender, Pennsylvania, 2010
Age Males Females Total
0-19 years 1,625,267 1,554,123 3,179,390
20-44 years 2,000,997 1,999,937 4,000,934
45-64 years 1,743,042 1,819,706 3,562,748
65 and over 821,057 1,138,250 1,959,307
Total 6,190,363 (48.7%) 6,512,016 (51.3%) 12,702,379
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Demographic Profile
Race and Ethnicity
Table 3
Population by Race in Montgomery County and Pennsylvania, 2010
Race Montgomery County Pennsylvania
White 649,021 10,406,288
African American 69,351 1,377,689
Asian 51,565 349,088
American Indian and Alaska Native 1,174 26,843
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander 296 3,653
Other 12,947 300,983
Identified by two or more 15,520
Total 799,874 12,702,379
Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Interactive Population Search
Education
There is an outstanding array of educational opportunities available for the
residents of Montgomery County. Between 2007-2011 there were 206, 423 residents over
the age of three enrolled in school: nursery schools (7.5%), kindergarten (4.5%),
8. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 8
elementary school 1-8 (39.4%), high school 9-12 (21.4%), and college/graduate school
(27.1%) (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). Also available to residents are more than 15
institutions of higher learning including Arcadia University, Bryn Mawr College, Harcum
College, Montgomery County Community College, Rosemont College, Ursinus College,
Gwynedd Mercy College, Manor Junior College, Pennsylvania State University-
Abington, and Temple University-Ambler. The 2007-2011 American Community Survey
shows that Montgomery County beat Pennsylvania for educational measures: 92.9% of
Montgomery county residents over the age of 25 are high school graduates or higher,
compared to 87.9% for the state of Pennsylvania; in the same cohort, 44.4% obtained a
bachelor’s degree or higher in comparison to the 26.7% for the state of Pennsylvania
(Table 4).
Table 4
Educational Attainment, Population Over 25, Montgomery County and Pennsylvania, 2007-2011
Educational Category Montgomery County Pennsylvania
Number Percent Number Percent
Less than 9th grade 12,339 2.2 332,207 3.9
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 26,928 4.9 709,982 8.2
High School graduate 142,136 25.8 3,233,796 37.6
Some college, no degree 89,195 16.2 1,402,444 16.3
Associates degree 35,270 6.4 636,147 7.4
Bachelors degree 141,805 25.8 1,416,932 16.5
Graduate or professional degree 102,752 18.7 879,628 10.2
Percent high school graduate or higher 92.9% 87.9%
Percent bachelor’s degree or higher 44.4% 26.7%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-2011 American Community Survey
Economic Characteristics
Household Income and Poverty Levels
According to the 2007-2011 American Community Survey, the county’s median
household income of $78,446 was higher than $51,651 for Pennsylvania. Estimates for
9. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 9
Montgomery county families below the poverty level are: 3.7% of all families; 1.8% of
married couple families; and 14.1% of all families with female householder, where there
is no husband present (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010). Percentages of Montgomery County
families below poverty level are lower than the estimates for Pennsylvania families living
below the poverty level. As described in Figure 2, a larger percentage of Montgomery
County households have incomes that exceed $100,000, while a smaller percentage is
represented throughout the state of Pennsylvania.
Figure 2
Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-2011 American Community Survey
Section 3: County Health Data
Snapshot of 2013 Health Outcomes for Montgomery County
Montgomery County is ranked the 6th healthiest for overall health outcomes, 5th
healthiest for mortality, and 10th healthiest for morbidity in the state of Pennsylvania.
Montgomery County has achieved the national targeted benchmark for premature death.
Poor or fair health and poor physical health days are slightly above the targeted
benchmark. Poor mental health days and low birth weight are significantly higher than
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
31.20% 31.20%
37.70%36.70% 36.40%
26.90%
PercentofHousehold
Estimated Income
HouseholdIncome by Montgomery County and
Pennsylvania,2007-2011
Montco
PA
10. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 10
the national targeted benchmark; therefore, mental health and birth weight poses a
concern for this county and needs to be decreased in order to improve overall health
outcomes (Table 5) (County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2013).
Table 5
Montgomery County
Health Ranking
Montgomery
Value
PA Value Target Value
Health Outcomes
Mortality:
Premature Death 5,172 6,973 5,317
Morbidity:
Poor or fair health 11% 14% 10%
Poor physical health
days
2.8 3.5 2.6
Poor mental health days 3.2 3.6 2.3
Low birth weight 7.2% 8.4% 6.0%
Source: County Health Rankings, Montgomery County, 2013
Pregnancy /Birth Rate
In 2010, Black female residents of Montgomery County accounted for the highest
percentage of low birth weights (13.6%), no prenatal care in first trimester (45%), and
births to mothers under the age of 18 (6.1%) within the county (Pennsylvania Department
of Health, 2013). In 2010, there were a total of 179,003 reported pregnancies with more
than half of those reported pregnancies being women between the ages of 20-29. Birth
outcomes in 2010 are as followed: 142,370 live births, 1,406 fetal deaths, and 35,227
induced abortions.
Cancer Incidence
In 2007-2009, cancer incidence rates were high for both male and female
residents of Montgomery County. Prostate cancer marked the biggest cancer rate for
males, while breast cancer was the highest in female residents. The second leading cancer
11. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 11
rate for both males and females was cancer of the lung and bronchus. The third leading
cancers for Montgomery County residents (both male and female) were colon and rectum
cancer (Table 6) (Pennsylvania Department of Health, 2013).
Table 6
Cancer Incidence in Montgomery County for Major Sites by Sex, 2007-2009
Male Female
All Sites 7,042 6,866
Prostate 2,149 -----
Female Breast ----- 2,009
Lung/Bronchus 844 871
Colon/Rectum 592 636
Urinary Bladder 558 195
Uterus ---- 490
Lymphoma 319 275
Kidney/Renal Pelvis 291 154
Melanoma 305 227
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Montgomery County Health Profile, 2012
Mortality Data
Leading Causes of Death
In 2010, there were a total of 6,937 deaths to Montgomery County residents. Cancer was
the leading cause of deaths in Montgomery County in 2010, accounting for 1,676 deaths.
The second leading cause of death in 2010 is heart disease (1,649 deaths), followed by
stroke (430 deaths), and chronic lower respiratory disease (311 deaths) (Table 67. The
top causes of deaths in 2010 vary by race and gender (Pennsylvania Department of
Health, 2013). For Whites the leading causes of death in 2010 were cancer, heart disease,
stroke, and chronic lower respiratory disease. For Blacks the leading causes of death in
2010 were heart disease, cancer, stroke, and chronic lower respiratory disease,
respectively. For females in 2010, the leading cause of deaths was cancer, while for
12. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 12
males the leading cause of deaths was heart disease. Leading causes of death also vary by
age group (Table 8) (Pennsylvania Department of Health, 2013).
Table 7
Montgomery County Deaths by Top 5 Causes of Death, Gender, and
Race, 2010
Cause of Death Black White All Other Races
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Heart Disease 63 57 723 779 14 5
Cancer 57 62 719 802 17 16
Stroke 21 28 140 227 5 7
Chronic Lower
Respiratory Disease
10 10 121 167 1 2
Non-transport
Accidents
12 3 130 103 2 1
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Death Statistics, 2010
Table 8
Leading Causes of Death in Montgomery County by Age Group, 2010
5 years and under 5-24 years 25-44 years 45-64 years 65 years and older
Perinatal
Conditions
31 Accidents 28 Accidents 68 Cancer 389 Heart Disease 1,462
Birth Defects 8 Suicide 12 Cancer 40 Heart Disease 171 Cancer 1,245
Accidents 2 Homicide 3 Suicide 31 Accidents 62 Stroke 397
Heart Disease 14 Suicide 51 C.L.R.D. 283
Diabetes 5 Liver Dis. 34 Alzhiemer’s 186
Total 53 Total 60 Total 198 Total 1026 Total 5,600
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Montgomery County Health Profile, 2012
Morbidity Data
Between 2008-2010, morbidity rates were the highest for the following selected
diseases: chlamydia, Lyme disease, gonorrhea, chronic hepatitis B, and salmonellosis.
There were a total of 132,819 cases of chlamydia, 13,518 cases of Lyme disease, 5,415
cases of salmonellosis, and 5,137 cases of chronic hepatitis B (Pennsylvania Department
of Health, 2013).
13. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 13
Communicable Diseases
HIV
There are currently 1,017 Montgomery County residents currently living with
AIDS as of December 2012. Approximately, 692 residents have died from HIV between
1980 and 2012 (Pennsylvania Department of Health, 2013). The annual diagnosis of
HIV/AIDs cases has continued to fluctuate over the last four years. There has been
neither a steady decrease nor a steady increase in the number of cases diagnosed each
year; however, there was a significant decrease in the amount of reported cases between
2010 and 2011 (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Annual HIV Surveillance Summary, 2012
Gonorrhea, Chlamydia and Primary and Secondary Syphilis
The most recent available data on sexually transmitted diseases is from 2007. In
2007, the total number of reported cases of chlamydia was drastically higher than those
reported cases of gonorrhea and primary and secondary syphilis combined. The age range
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2009 2010 2011 2012
NumberofCases
Year of Diagnosis
HIV/AIDS Cases in Montgomery County
by Year of Diagnosis, 2009-2012
HIV/AIDS Cases
14. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 14
of 15-24 years old had the highest reported cases for both gonorrhea (142 cases) and
chlamydia (876 cases) (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Health, STD Regional Report, 2007
Snapshot of 2013 Health Behaviors that Impact Health Outcomes in
Montgomery County
Montgomery County is ranked 2nd healthiest for overall health factors and 3rd
healthiest for health behaviors in the state of Pennsylvania. Montgomery County has
achieved the national targeted benchmark for both obesity and physical inactivity
(County Health Rankings, 2013). This shows that the county is physically active in turn
lower the amount of individuals who are obese. Motor vehicle crash death rate and teen
birth rate are below the national targeted benchmark. The problem areas for this county
142
876
3
64
255
3
37 50
5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Gonorrhea Chlamydia P &S Syphilis
NumberofReportedCases
STD Cases by Age and Disease Category
in Montgomery County, 2007
15-24 years
25-34 years
35-44 years
15. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 15
are smoking, drinking, and sexually transmitted infections all of which are significantly
higher than the target benchmark (Table 9).
Table 9
Health Factors
Health Behaviors Montgomery
Value
PA Value Target Value
Adult Smoking 16% 21% 13%
Adult Obesity 25% 29% 25%
Physical Inactivity 21% 26% 21%
Excessive Drinking 17% 17% 7%
Motor Vehicle Crash Death
Rate
7 12 10
Sexually Transmitted Infections 197 374 92
Teen Birth Rate 15 29 21
Source: County Health Rankings, Montgomery County, 2013
16. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 16
Section 5: Selected Health Priorities for Montgomery County
The top 10 health concerns for Montgomery county residents are: heart
disease, cancer, sexually transmitted diseases, Lyme Disease, prenatal care,
smoking, drinking, stroke, physical activity, and salmonellosis. From this list 4 topics
were chosen to be the counties health priorities:
Heart Disease and Cancer Prevention
Overview
Heart Disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. There an existing
conditions as well as health behaviors that pose a risk for developing heart disease. C
Cancer, also known medically as malignant neoplasm, is characterized by unregulated
cell growth. Conditions that place people at a higher risk for developing heart disease and
cancer are high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes. Healthy behaviors such as
tobacco use, unhealthy eating, lacked of physical activity, obesity, and alcohol
consumption all increased the risk of heart disease (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention [CDC], 2013).
County Analysis
Heart Disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Data from the
County Health Ranking (2013) shows that smoking and alcohol consumption rates are
significantly higher than the national intended value. Although Montgomery County has
achieved the intended target value for obesity and physical inactivity it would still be
beneficial to lower this current value. All those health behaviors that pose a risk for heart
disease are present in Montgomery County. The residents are participating in risky health
17. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 17
behaviors that have lead to a large amount of deaths due to heart disease. Prostate cancer
is the highest reported cancer cite for male residents of Montgomery County, while breast
cancer is the highest for female residents. Lung and Bronchus cancer is the second
leading cancer in both women and men. Reviewing the data on smoking habits of
Montgomery County residents it could be concluded that smoking may be the primary
cause.
Disparities
In Montgomery County, Heart Disease affects more men than women and the
number of deaths due to heart disease increases with age. Black women have the highest
death rates of all social and ethnic groups in reference to breast cancer (CDC, 2013).
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Overview
The CDC (2013) suggests that there are more than 100 million STDs nationwide
among both women and men. Young people tend to have a higher risk of acquiring STDs
due to a combination of behavioral and biological reasons. Consistent and correct use of
protective barriers can reduce the transmission of STDs
County Analysis
In 2007, chlamydia is the leading STD reported across all age ranges. It also
accounted for the highest morbidity rate between 2008-2010 in Montgomery County. The
second leading STD reported for Montgomery County is gonorrhea.
18. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 18
Disparities
Those residents between the ages of 15-24 accounted for the highest number of
reported cases of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and primary and secondary syphilis.
Prenatal Care
Overview
Prenatal care is health care that you receive while you are pregnant. It is
structured to make sure that the mother and baby remain healthy throughout the duration
of the pregnancy. Through prenatal care doctors our able to determine can complication
early and treat them. It is a form of early intervention that is beneficial in preventing
problems and giving the baby a healthy start on life. Babies of mothers who do not seek
prenatal care are three times more likely to have a baby born with low birth weight. They
are also five times more likely to die giving birth than those mothers who sought prenatal
care (womenshealth.gov).
County Analysis
In 2010, 25.7% of women did not receive prenatal care during that first trimester.
During that same year there were a total of 67 fetal deaths. 6.7% of those women who
gave birth gave birth to babies with a low birth weight (Pennsylvania Department of
Health, 2013).
Disparities
19. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 19
A higher percentage of Black women whom reside in Montgomery County bore
babies with low birth weight and did not have prenatal care in first trimester in
comparison to white women (Pennsylvania Department of Health, 2013).
20. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 20
Section 6: Existing Health Resources for Montgomery County
Hospitals
Abington Memorial Hospital
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Central Montgomery Medical Center
Chestnut Hill Rehabilitation Hospital
Eagleville Hospital and Rehabilitation
Center
Einstein Medical Center Montgomery
Elkins Park Hospital
Grand View hospital
Holy Redeemer Hospital
Lankenau Hospital
Montgomery County Emergency
Services Inc
Montgomery Hospital
Norristown State Hospital
Northwestern Institute of Psychiatry
Pottstown Memorial Medical Center
Suburban Mercy Hospital
The Horsham Clinic
Valley Forge Medical Center
Health Centers
Norristown Health Center
Phone: 610-278-5145
Address: Montgomery County Human Services Center
1430 DeKalb Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Fax: 610-278-5166
Services: Immunizations, communicable disease testing, and TB and Lead Screening
Pottstown Health Center
Phone: 610-278-5145
Address: Montgomery County Human Services Center
1430 DeKalb Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Fax: 610-278-5166
Services: Immunizations, communicable disease testing, and TB and Lead Screening
Willow Grove Health Center
Phone: 610-278-5145
Address: Montgomery County Human Services Center
1430 DeKalb Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Fax: 610-278-5166
Services: Immunizations, communicable disease testing, and TB and Lead Screening
Prenatal Care
Montgomery County Prenatal Service Program
Contact: Infant Health Coordinator
21. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 21
Address: Family OB/GYN Center
15 West Wood Street, 2nd Fl
Norristown, PA 19401
Phone: 610-270-2210
Services: early care, laboratory tests, pregnancy education, counseling on healthy eating,
and assistance with smoking cessation and substance abuse
Maternal and Family Health Services, Inc. –Abington Center
Address: 1128 Old York Rd, Suite B
Abington, PA 19001
Phone: 215-887-8006
Services: health screenings, nutrition education, and provides vouchers for purchase of
nutritious foods
*There are 3 other locations within Montgomery County: Norristown, Lansdale, and
Pottstown.
United Health Care, Inc.-Moms Program
Phone: 1-800-321-4462
Address: Wanamaker Building
100 Penn, Sq East, Suite 100
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Services: health insurance programs, childbirth classes, OB/GYN, home visiting,
pregnancy testing, prenatal clinics, teen pregnancy, information/referral
Smoking Cessation
Coalition for Tobacco-Free Montgomery County
Phone: 800-200-2229
Address: PO BOX 904
Dublin, PA 18917
Fax: 215-249-1721
Services: nicotine replacement products, education on the harms of smoking, advocacy,
and coordination of cessation programs
HIV/STD Health Service Agencies
Planned Parenthood-Norristown
Phone: 610-279-6095
Address: 1221 Powell Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Services: abortion referral, birth control, HIV testing, LGBT services, emergency
contraception, pregnancy testing and services, STD testing/treatment, and vaccines
22. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 22
Family Service of Montgomery County
Phone: 610-630-2111
Address: Administrative & Central Office
3125 Ridge Pike
Eagleville, PA 19403
Services: home support services, senior companion, meals on wheels
23. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 23
Section 7: Next Steps
Dissemination Plan
Now that the health issues have be prioritized and health resources have been
identified, the assessment team aims to disseminate all its results and findings to the local
health department, community partners, community stakeholders, and the general
population. The dissemination plan focuses on publications and presentations that can be
easily shared with multiple groups.
Publications
Publish findings and selected health priorities in a number of media formats
including hard copies, CD-ROM, and electronic copies
Develop a Public Service Announcement (PSA)
Prepare a short summary of our findings that simply highlights the key points of
the community health assessment
Create a PowerPoint presentation that will be used to present the teams findings
Presentations
Share PSA with key public health officials
Present findings to local health service centers and surrounding county hospitals
Develop a news article that can be featured by the Montgomery News Network
Present findings to YMCA’s within Montgomery County whom can post and
share findings with the local residents
24. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 24
Action Plan
Heart Disease and Cancer Prevention
Decrease Blood Pressure
o Promote Healthy Eating
o Partner with markets: Acme, Whole Foods, The Fresh Market, etc.
Decrease Tobacco Use
o Tobacco-Free Campaign in partnership with the Coalition for Tobacco-
Free Montgomery County
o Promote local business and surrounding facilities to become smoke free
Increase Physical Activity
o Development of physical activity programs using county parks and
recreational facilities
Monthly activity schedules
Free of charge
Increase the amount of women obtaining mammograms
o Campaign
Reproductive Health
Decrease the number of reported HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted disease
cases
o Safe sex campaign using flyers and billboards
o Increase publicity of screening and treatment agencies
Increase condom use
25. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 25
o Increase availability: doctors offices, counseling offices, planned
parenthood
o Promote importance of continuous condom use for adults and elderly as
well
Prenatal Care
Decrease the percentage of children born with low birth weights
o Nutrition education and workshops with the help of Women, Infants, and
Children (WIC) offices throughout Montgomery County
Eliminate disparities for Black female residents of Montgomery County
o Conduct a prenatal care survey to identify factors that cause health
disparities in pregnancy and birth
o Use findings of survey to create an action plan specifically for increasing
prenatal care in black females
Increase use of prenatal services
o Create a listing of prenatal services located in Montgomery county and
disperse them in all appropriate facilities
26. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 26
References
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Heart Disease. Retrieved July, 9,
2013, from http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/statistics.htm
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Sexually transmitted diseases.
Retrieved July, 9, 2013, from http://www.cdc.gov/std/default.htm
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Cancer. Retrieved July, 9, 2013, from
http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/
County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. (2013). 2013 County snapshot: Montgomery
county. Retrieved July 9, 2013, from
http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/pennsylvania/2013/montgomery/county
/outcomes/overall/snapshot/by-rank
Pennsylvania Department of Health. (2013). Montgomery county health profile 2012.
Retrieved July 9, 2013, from
http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=596007&mode=
2
Pennsylvania Department of Health. (2013). 2007 STD regional report. Retrieved July 9,
2013, from
http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=557965&mode=
2
Pennsylvania Department of Health. (2013). 2012 Annual HIV surveillance summary.
Retrieved July 9, 2013, from
http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=557343&mode=
2
Pennsylvania Department of Health. (2013). Death statistics. Retrieved July 9, 2013,
from
http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&objID=596038&mode=
2
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Demographic profile: Pennsylvania. Retrieved July
10, 2013, from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xht
ml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Demographic profile: Montgomery county. Retrieved
July 10, 2013, from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid
=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1
27. MONTGOMERY COUNTY HEALTH ASSESSMENT 2013 27
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2007-2011 American community survey 5-year estimates:
Montgomery County. Retrieved July 8, 2013, from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid
=ACS_11_5YR_DP02
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2007-2011 American community survey 5-year estimates:
Pennsylvania. Retrieved July 8, 2013, from
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid
=ACS_11_5YR_DP02
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Interactive population search: Montgomery County.
Retrieved July 8, 2013, from
http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=42:42091
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 Interactive population search: Pennsylvania.
Retrieved July 8, 2013, from
http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=42
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Womens Health. (2013).
Prenatal care fact sheet. Retrieved July, 13, 2013, from
http://womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/prenatal-
care.pdf