More Related Content Similar to Molecular and Functional Immune Assays as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools to Assess the Risk of Acute Subclinical Rejection After Kidney Transplantation Similar to Molecular and Functional Immune Assays as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools to Assess the Risk of Acute Subclinical Rejection After Kidney Transplantation (20) More from Kevin Jaglinski More from Kevin Jaglinski (11) Molecular and Functional Immune Assays as Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tools to Assess the Risk of Acute Subclinical Rejection After Kidney Transplantation1. MolecularandFunctional Immune AssaysasNon-Invasive DiagnosticToolstoAssessthe Riskof Acute
Subclinical RejectionAfterKidneyTransplantation
O. Bestard,1,2
E.Crespo,1
T. Sigdel,2
S.Roedder,2
Y.Ng,2
J.Cruzado,1
M. Lúcia,1
S.-C.Hsieh,1
T.Tran,1
J.
Grinyó,1
M. Sarwal.1
1
KidneyTransplant Unit, Bellvitge UniversityHospital, Barcelona, CAT, Spain
2
Department ofTransplant Surgery, UCSF, SanFrancisco, CA.
Subclinical allograftrejection(sc-AR) isstillamaincause of allograftlossthatcan onlybe assessed
throughinvasive surveillancebiopsies.We soughttoinvestigatewhetherthe combinationof novelnon-
invasive biomarkersatthe molecularandimmune functionallevel couldhelpidentifyingpatientsatrisk
of sc-ARafterkidneytransplantation.
Methods:
We combinedthe assessmentof the donor-specificIFN-γ T-cellELISPOTwithahighlysensitiveand
specifictranscriptional biomarkertestinperipheral bloodsamplespredictingkidneysolidorganclinical
rejection(KSORT) usingqPCR,inagroup of 75 consecutive kidneytransplantpatientsatthe time of 6-
monthprotocol biopsies.
Results:
All patientsreceivedCNI-basedIMSandeitherrATG or basilimab.22/75(29%) patientsshowed
histological lesionsof sc-AR(18TCMR, 5 ABMR and 1 mix TCMR/ABMR), 22 showedborderline (BL)
lesionsand31 a stable (STA) parenchyma.The KSORTshowedahigh-risk(HR) andlow-risk(LR) scoresin
23% and77% patients,respectively.The T-cell ELISPOTwaspositivein41% of patients,whereas
negative in59%.82% and 70% patientswithBL lesionsshowedaLR KSORTand negative T-cell Elispot,
respectively.The KSORTcorrectlyclassifiedasLR 98%) STA andas HR 70% sc-AR (p<0.001), further
discriminatingasHR all (100%) sc-ABMR and 62.5% sc-TCMR (p<0.001). The d-sT-cell ELISPOTaccurately
ruledoutthe presence of sc-TCMR in72% and predicteditspresencein83.3% (p<0,001), whereasitdid
not discriminate patientswithsc-ABMR(p=NS).transplantrecipientswithapositive T-cellELISPOT
showedsignificantlyhighertubulitisandinterstitiuminfiltratesthanpatientswithnegativeaELISPOT
test,whereasthose patientswithapositive KSORTdidshow bothhighertubulitis(at) andinterstium
infiltrates(ai) aswell ashigherglomerulitis(ag) andperitubularcapillarities(ptc).
Conclusions:
Combininganon-invasivemolecularandfunctional cellularimmuneassayallowsanaccurate
identificationof patientsdevelopingsc-AR,dissectingthe mainalloimmune effectormechanism
responsible of it.