The document discusses various controversies and trends surrounding modern-day JVM technologies, focusing on build tools like Maven versus Gradle, and frameworks such as microservices and Kubernetes. It emphasizes the need to balance developer decisions with economic reality, considering maintenance costs and the productivity impact of different programming languages and practices. The text also highlights the importance of avoiding waste and simplifying processes while navigating the complexities of software development.

1. MODERN-DAY
JVM
CONTROVERSIES
MAVEN OR GRADLE?

2. BACKGROUND
+ CAVEATS

3. FLAME WAR STEPS
▸ The Talking Parrot Phase
▸ “It’s got Electrolytes” , “It’s Web-Scale”
▸ The Google Lookup Phase
▸ “X is better then Y”
▸ The Emotional Breakdown Phase
▸ “X sucks! , Y is evil!” , name calling …
▸ .. if you’re lucky “Goodwin’s Law”

4. MicroServices
Kubernetenes
Docker
Kotlin

5. LEVEL SET
▸ Economics 101
▸ Needs are infinite, resources are finite
▸ Probability 101
▸ Rule-of-Thumb, “In general,” , sensible defaults
▸ Human Nature 101
▸ Self-Interest / Identity
▸ Biases / Shiny-Objects
▸ Rules based -> Big Picture (Dreyfus Model)

6. DREYFUS MODEL OF SKILL ACQUISITION
Novice Begineer Competent Proficient Expert
Rigid Adherence to Rules
Holistic Picture

7. DEVELOPER PRODUCTIVITY
▸ Higher-Level Trend
▸ Key velocity driver
▸ Getting closer to “business value” / “English”
▸ Majority of time and cost is in Maintenance + Day 2
▸ Cost directly proportional to number of moving pieces /
LOC
▸ Average developer job length - ~2 years

8. DEVELOPER WASTE
▸ Eliminate Waste
▸ Time spent on non-value add items, is NOT spent on actual
business value
▸ Everything is a Trade-Off
▸ Hardware Costs (↓) vs Human Costs (↑)
▸ Flexibility is a Cost ! Change is Certain
▸ Reduce Cycle Time , MVP, YAGNI

9. DEVELOPER DECISIONS
▸ Leverage Industry Lessons
▸ What are Startups doing ?
▸ What are the Giants doing?**
▸ Proven tech instead of DIY
▸ Market Trends / Hiring
▸ StackOverflow / Google Trends
▸ Transparency around the Cons / Costs
▸ Include Alternatives!
** Keep in mind you’re NOT operating NetFlix scale!!

10. CONSTRUCTOR DEPENDENCY INJECTION
▸ Alternatives:
▸ Setter or Field
▸ @Required annotation
▸ More Readable ? Better for Testing?
▸ Less Error-Prone ?
▸ Just Stay Consistent !
▸ Stop Bike Shedding !!

11. EASY HARD
TRIVIAL
CONSEQUENTIAL
BIKE-SHEDDING
? ?

13. SCALA
▸ More succinct then Java, focus on performance
▸ Steep Learning Curve / High Investment
▸ Non-Standard Stack (SBT, Akka, Actors, Play, etc)
▸ IDE Support / Backwards Compatibility Issues
▸ Questionable MarketTrend
▸ Questionable Performance
▸ Justify with real Metrics

15. KOTLIN
▸ More succinct then Java, focus on developer productivity
▸ True Null-Safety (not Optional!)
▸ Low Learning Curve / Low Investment
▸ Works well with Java EcoSystem
▸ Great IDE Support! Backwards Compatibility !
▸ Positive Developer Productivity Improvements
▸ Positive MarketTrend
▸ Question of Political Capital .. (Esperanto)

16. DYNAMIC TYPING
▸ Less Code
▸ Not being forced to define full contract (JSON, XML, REST, DB, etc)
▸ SOAP (WSDL) -> REST -> Spring Cloud Contracts
▸ Checked vs Runtime Exceptions
▸ More Error-Prone
▸ Testing was suppose to negate this
▸ Alternatives exist:
▸ XPath, Optional Typing, etc
▸ Upfront Velocity Improvement , Long Term Maintenance Costs
▸ Minimize for Corporate

17. .NET (C#)
▸ More succinct code (historically)
▸ Lacking ecosystem (historically)
▸ Windows, IIS, Visual Studio, NuGet, OSS Support, Costs!
▸ Still Lagging with Cloud-Native
▸ Would a startup use .NET?
▸ StackOverflow aside!
▸ CEO Friday: Why we don’t hire .NET programmers
▸ Dependant on current developers / code / and market

18. PAIR PROGRAMMING
▸ Costs:
▸ Developers don’t type twice as fast with someone sitting beside them
▸ Design by Consensus
▸ Mitigates:
▸ Ivory Towers
▸ Knowledge Silos / Information Hoarding
▸ The Elephant in the Room :
▸ Highly Focused Development / Minimized Distractions
▸ Healthy Competition
▸ Give it a try !!
▸ Mandate helps

19. AUTOMATED TESTS
▸ Granular mock heavy Unit Tests, and BDD style (Cucumber Tests)
▸ Costs (often ignored!)
▸ Refactoring Costs / Avoidance
▸ Testing Plumbing instead of Business Value
▸ Additional Layers (BBD Cucumber)
▸ Alternatives Exist:
▸ Smoke Tests / Integration Tests
▸ Monitoring / Alerting
▸ What about TDD?
▸ Focus on ROI + delete Questionable Tests

22. COMMON CODE BASES
▸ Internal Frameworks, ORM’s, Platforms, Testing Libs, Common-Libs, etc
▸ Costs:
▸ Learning Curves for Developers
▸ Dependency on Current developers
▸ Not writing actual business value!
▸ Maintenance Costs
▸ Multiple Repos / Artifactory / CI requirements complexities
▸ Alternatives:
▸ Embed in Application (first 3 times)
▸ Use 3rd Party (often OSS) solutions, which will almost always be better documented / supported

23. GRADLE
▸ Benefits:
▸ Easier to Read (no XML), Less LOC
▸ Easier to Extend (instead of Bash scripts!)
▸ Significant Build Time Improvements! (X factor)
▸ Comes down to Political Capital

24. MULTIPLE SOURCE CODE REPOSITORIES
▸ For Same Team and Same Deliverable
▸ Costs:
▸ Lack of Atomicity between commits
▸ CI/CD overhead
▸ Local Development costs
▸ Would would Jesus Google do ?

25. MICROSERVICES
▸ Tackles challenges of Monoliths (especially large size ones)
▸ Costs (almost always ignored!)
▸ Performance, DevOps, Transactions, Versioning, Resource Costs, etc
▸ “You must be this tall to use”
▸ Alternatives Exist:
▸ Cookie Cutter Scaling (Easier Scaling!!)
▸ “Decouple” at Project Level
▸ Address fundamental issues first !
▸ Monoliths are not EVIL! - Can scale and cleanly separate / decouple code !
▸ Default to Pizza-Team Sized Services - “Right-Sized Services”

26. KUBERNETES (CAAS)
▸ Comparing to IaaS or PaaS?
▸ Higher Level of Abstraction then IaaS
▸ Orchestration, OS Abstraction, Availability
▸ Lower Level of Abstraction then PaaS
▸ Networking, Buildpacks, Pods, Docker Files, etc
▸ Stick to the Highest Possible Level of Abstraction

27. REACTIVE PROGRAMMING (WEBFLUX)
▸ “Non-blocking” stack to minimize thread usage and scale better (i.e. Performance Optimization)
▸ Costs
▸ Steep Learning Curve / Legibility / Testing
▸ Concurrency Performance Gains
▸ High Count (1000+) (↑) , Low Count (↓ ?)
▸ Limited Support (Database / FrontEnd)
▸ Positive MarketTrend
▸ Threads are NOT bad !!
▸ Consider the Trade-offs / you can mix and match (with Spring-MVC)

28. CONCURRENT REST CALLS EXAMPLE

30. BUZZWORD POT-POURRI
▸ MicroServices
▸ Reactive + Non-Blocking
▸ NoSQL + CQRS + Event Sourcing
▸ Scala + Akka
▸ A “Manifesto” for good measure

31. LAGOM
▸ New Reactive Microservices Framework
▸ From Typesafe Lightbend
▸ Steep Learning Curve!
▸ Significant Risk + Cost !
▸ Unproven buzzword’y benefits

32. OTHER ITEMS OF CONTROVERSY
▸ Tabs vs Spaces
▸ EJBS’s
▸ IntelliJ vs Eclipse vs NetBeans
▸ Optionals
▸ Server Side vs Client Side (SPA)
▸ ReactJS vs Angular
▸ 10x Developers
▸ OOP vs Functional vs Procedural
▸ Branching
▸ CPU / Thread Optimization
▸ Immutable Types + “final” on everything
▸ Theory of Constraints
▸ …

33. KEY POINTS
▸ Think Big Picture + Context
▸ .. instead of Tech X Sucks / is Bad / etc
▸ Rules are great for beginners (pick the right ones!)
▸ Focus on ROI
▸ Trade-offs / Opportunity Costs
▸ Fundamentals
▸ Maintenance Costs (minimize Snowflakes)
▸ Metrics (instead of assumptions) to drive non-standard choices
▸ What’s your Developer “Identity”?
▸ Technologies come and go!
▸ Default to Simplicity instead of Rube-Goldberg Machines

34. BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS

35. DUNNING KRUGER EFFECT + IMPOSTER SYNDROME
Actual Ability
PerceivedAbility
Dunning Kruger Effect / Expert Beginner
Imposter Syndrome