Mma6e chapter-20 final

Marketing Management:
An Asian Perspective,
6th Edition
Instructor Supplements
Created by Geoffrey da Silva

Introducing New Market Offerings
20 © Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 2013. All rights reserved
3

Learning Issues for Chapter Twenty
1. What challenges does a company face in developing new
products and services?
2. What organizational structures and processes do managers
use to oversee new-product development?
3. What are the main stages in developing new products and
services?
4. What is the best way to manage the new-product
development process?
5. What factors affect the rate of diffusion and consumer
adoption of newly launched products and services?

Chapter Outline
• New-product development shapes the company’s future.
Improved or replacement products and services can maintain
or build sales; new-to-the-world products and services can
transform industries and companies and change lives.
• But the low success rate of new products and services points
to the many challenges they face.

Chapter Outline
• Companies are doing more than just talking about innovation.
They are challenging industry norms and past conventions to
develop new products and services that delight and engage
consumers.
• Marketers play a key role in new-product development by
identifying and evaluating ideas and working with R&D and
other areas in every stage of development.

New Product Options
Make or Buy??
• A company can add new products through acquisition or
development.
• The acquisition route can take three forms:
i. The company can buy other companies.
ii. It can acquire patents from other companies.
iii. It can buy a license or franchise from another company.
• But firms can successfully make only so many acquisitions. At
some point, they need organic growth—the development of
new products from within.

Product Development Routes
The development route can take two forms:
1. It can develop new products in its own laboratories called
organic growth.
2. It can contract with independent researchers or new-product
development firms to develop new products.

Types of New Products
• New products range from new-to-the-world products that create an entirely
new market to minor improvements or revisions of existing products.
• Most new-product activity is devoted to improving existing products.
• Fewer than 10 to 15 percent of all new products are truly innovative and
new to the world. These products involve the greatest cost and risk
because they are new to both the company and the marketplace.
• Most new-product activity is devoted to improving existing products.
• Many high-tech firms strive for radical innovation.

Incremental Improvements in Product Development
Samsung makes incremental improvements to stay ahead of competition.

Radical Innovations
• High-tech firms in telecommunications, computers, consumer
electronics, biotech, and software seek radical innovation.
• They face a number of challenges in launching their
products:
i. high technological uncertainty;
ii. high market uncertainty;
iii. high competitive volatility;
iv. high investment costs;
v. short product life cycles; and
vi. difficulty in finding funding sources for risky projects.

Challenges in New-Product Development
New-product introductions have accelerated, and in retailing,
consumer goods, electronics, autos, and other industries, the
time to bring a product to market has been cut in half.

The Innovative Imperative
• In an economy of rapid change, continuous innovation is a
necessity. Highly innovative firms are able to identify and
quickly seize new market opportunities.
• Innovative firms create a positive attitude toward innovation
and risk taking, routinize the innovation process, practice
teamwork, and allow their people to experiment and even fail.

The Innovative Imperative
• Companies that fail to develop new products put themselves
at risk.
– Their existing products are vulnerable to changing customer needs
and tastes, new technologies, shortened product life cycles, and
increased domestic and foreign competition. New technologies are
especially threatening.

Continuous Innovation
Japanese toiletry brand, Shokubutsu from LION Corporation, adds new variants to its body foam
product line with whitening, anti-bacteria, soothing, revitalizing, firming, nourishing, and
moisturizing qualities as part of its continuous innovation.

New Product Success
• Most established companies focus on incremental innovation.
Entering new markets by tweaking products for new customers,
using variations on a core product to stay one step ahead of the
market, and creating interim solutions for industry-wide problems.
• Newer companies create disruptive technologies.
• Established companies can be slow to react or invest in these
disruptive technologies because they threaten their investment.
• Incumbent firms must carefully monitor the preferences of both
customers and non-customers over time and uncover evolving,
difficult-to-articulate customer needs.

Disruptive Technologies
Electric cars like the Leaf are an example of a product with disruptive technology because they
change the way cars gain their energy, and hence, the competitive landscape.

Ensuring New Product Success
• What else can a company do to develop successful new products?
• Robert G. Cooper and Elko J. Kleinschmidt found that the number-one
success factor is a unique, superior product.
• Another key factor is a well-defined product concept. The
company that carefully defines and assesses the target market,
product requirements, and benefits before proceeding has a lower
rate of failure.
• Other success factors are technological and marketing synergy,
quality of execution in all stages, and market attractiveness.

Developing a Successful Product Concept
P&G’s Swiffer was an idea adapted from Japanese company Unicharm.

Local or Global Product Development?
• Cooper and Kleinschmidt also found that domestic products
designed solely for the domestic market tend to show a high
failure rate, low market share, and low growth.
• In contrast, products designed for the world market—or at
least to include neighboring countries—achieve significantly
more profits, both at home and abroad.
• The implication is that companies should adopt an
international focus in designing and developing new
products.

New Product Failure
• New products continue to fail at rates as high as 50 percent
or even 95 percent in the U.S. and 90 percent in Europe.
• They fail for many reasons:
a. ignoring or misinterpreting market research;
b. overestimating market size;
c. high development costs;
d. poor design;
e. incorrect positioning,
f. ineffective advertising or wrong price;
g. insufficient distribution support;
h. competitors who fight back hard; and
i. inadequate return on investment or payback.

Drawbacks—New Product Failure
1. Shortage of important ideas in certain areas—There may be few ways left
to improve some basic products (such as steel or detergents).
2. Fragmented markets—Companies have to aim their new products at
smaller market segments, and this can mean lower sales and profits for
each product.
3. Social and governmental constraints—New products have to satisfy
consumer safety and environmental concerns.
4. Cost of development—A company typically has to generate many ideas to
find just one worthy of development, and often faces high R&D,
manufacturing, and marketing costs.

5. Capital shortages—Some companies with good ideas cannot raise
the funds needed to research and launch them.
6. Shorter development time—Companies must learn how to
compress development time by using new techniques, strategic
partners, early concept tests, and advanced marketing planning.
7. Poor launching time—New products are sometimes launched after
the category has already taken off or when there is still insufficient
interest.

8. Shorter product life cycles—When a new product is successful,
rivals are quick to copy it.
9. Organizational support—The new product may not mesh with the
corporate culture or receive the financial or other support it needs.

Lenovo’s LePad and LePhone were failures in China.
(Launched in 2011)
Lenovo posted disappointing sales of LePad even though it offered distinctive advantages over the
iPad. With no price advantage—it was priced almost similarly to the iPad—the more functional LePad
lost to Apple because Chinese consumers would rather own a high-status Apple product.

Table 20.1: Causes of New-Product Failure

Asian Implications for New Product Development
• Asian companies have typically not invested heavily in long-term
research because there were more lucrative and stable
profits to be earned from licensing and trading.
• The generally hierarchical and paternalistic management style
of Asian companies and society may also discourage creativity
or creative people.

Challenge of Creativity in Innovation (Asian
implications)
Creativity is less fostered in collectivistic Asia because like the tall tree which catches the wind,
employees are encouraged to fit in and not stand out.

• Societies that are collectivistic and high in power distance,
masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance (e.g., Pakistan, the
Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, and Japan) tend to facilitate the
implementation phase of new-product development through
their emphasis on interdependence, cooperation, and unified
purpose; centralized command to ensure the coordination of
complex efforts; promotion of goal directedness and
formalization; and risk aversion, and tight planning and
control.

• Societies with a positive Confucian dynamic like Hong Kong,
Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, have values indicating a
dynamic, future-oriented mentality such as persistence, hard
work, thrift, shame, and a strong regard for relationships.
• The positive pole of Confucian dynamism promotes new-product
development at the initiation and the implementation
stages by emphasizing action and future possibilities.

Organizational Arrangements
• Many companies today use customer-driven engineering to
design new products.
• Customer-driven engineering attaches high importance to
incorporating customer preferences in the final design.
• New product development requires senior management to
define business domain, product categories, and specific
criteria.

Example of ‘Acceptance Criteria’ in New Product
Development
1. The product can be introduced within five years.
2. The product has a market potential of at least $50 million
and a 15 percent growth rate.
3. The product would provide at least 30 percent return on
sales and 40 percent on investment.
4. The product would achieve technical or market leadership.

Budgeting for New-Product Development
• R&D outcomes are so uncertain that it is difficult to use normal
investment criteria when budgeting for new-product development.
• Some companies solve this problem by financing as many projects
as possible, hoping to achieve a few winners.
• Others apply conventional percentage of sales figures.
• Spend what the competition does.
• Table 20.2 shows how a company might calculate the cost of new-product
development.

Table 20.2: Finding One Successful New Product (Starting
with 64 New Ideas)

Many failed prototypes are needed before finding
the winning product.
Inventor Sir James Dyson is willing
to endure many failed prototypes
as long as he comes up with a
winner, like the Air Multiplier
bladeless table fan.

Organizing New-Product Development
Companies handle the organizational aspect of new-product
development in several ways.
1. New-product manager
2. High-level management committee
3. New-product department
4. Venture teams

New Product Managers
• Many companies assign responsibility for new-product ideas
to product managers.
• But product managers are often so busy managing existing
lines that they give little thought to new products other than
line extensions.
• They also lack the specific skills and knowledge needed to
develop and critique new products.

New Product Department
• Large companies often establish a new-product department
headed by a manager who has substantial authority and
access to top management.
• The department’s major responsibilities include generating
and screening new ideas, working with the R&D department,
and carrying out field-testing and commercialization.

Venture Teams and Cross-Functional Teams
• A venture team is a cross-functional group charged with
developing a specific product or business.
– These skunkworks are informal places where “intrapreneurial"
teams attempt to develop new products.
• Cross-functional teams can collaborate and use concurrent
new-product development to push new products to market.
Cross-functional teams help to ensure that engineers are not
just driven to create a “better mousetrap” when potential
customers do not really need or want one.

Stage-Gate System
• Some companies use the stage-gate system to manage the
innovation process.
• The gatekeepers make one of four decisions at each stage of
the process:
i. Go
ii. Kill
iii. Hold
iv. Recycle
• The process can be depicted as a funnel.

Stages in the New Product Development Process
• The stages in the new-product development process are shown in
Figure 20.1.
• Many firms have multiple, parallel sets of projects working through
the process, each at a different stage.
• The process can be depicted as a funnel: a large number of initial
new-product ideas and concepts are winnowed down to a few high-potential
products that are ultimately launched.
• But the process is not always linear. Many firms use a spiral
development process that recognizes the value of returning to an
earlier stage to make improvements before moving forward

Figure 20.1: The New-Product Development Decision
Process

MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: IDEAS
The new product development process starts with
the search for ideas

Idea Generation
• The new-product development process starts with the search
for ideas.
• Some marketing experts believe that the greatest
opportunities and highest leverage with new products are
found by uncovering the best possible set of unmet customer
needs or technological innovation.
• New-product ideas can come from interacting with various
groups and from using creativity-generating techniques.

Memo and Insights
• Marketing Memo: “Ten Ways to Find Great New-Product
Ideas”
– Lists the 10 idea generation suggestions to find great new-product
ideas, by Robert Cooper in his book, Product Leadership:
Creating and Launching Superior New Products.
• Marketing Insight: P&G’s new connect and develop approach
to innovation
– Relates how P&G’s corporate profits and revenues jumped helped
by new products. P&G adapted a “connect and develop” model
that emphasizes the pursuit of more externally sourced
innovations.

Marketing Memo: Ten ways to Find Great New-Product
Ideas
© Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 2013. All rights reserved 46

DIG Framework
• Erich Joachimsthaler believes some of the best new-product
opportunities are right in front of marketers’ eyes.
• The mistake too many make, he says, is to view the world
from the perspective of their own products and services and
search for customers for them.
• His demand-first innovation and growth (DIG) framework is
designed to provide companies with an unbiased view and an
outside-in perspective of demand opportunities.

The Three Elements of the DIG Framework
1. The demand landscape—Use observational, anthropological,
and ethnographic methods or consumer self-reports to map
consumer needs, wants, and even beyond.
2. The opportunity space—Use conceptual lens and structured
innovative-thinking tools to achieve market perspectives
from different angles.
3. The strategic blueprint—Think about how the new product
can fit into customers’ lives and how it can be distinguished
from competitors.

Marketing Memo: Seven Ways to Draw New Ideas
from Your Customers
• Lists the seven ways that companies get new ideas from their
customers: observe, ask, use customer advisory boards, use
Web sites for new ideas, use the community of enthusiasts;
encourage challenges or improvements in your product.
• Technical companies can learn a great deal by studying
customers who make the most advance use of the company’s
products and who recognize the need for improvements
before other customers do.

Marketing Memo: Seven Ways to Draw New Ideas
from Your Customers
© Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 2013. All rights reserved 50

Interacting with Others
• Encouraged by the open innovation movement, many firms are
going outside their bounds to tap external sources of new ideas,
including customers, employees, scientists, engineers, channel
members, marketing agencies, top management, and even
competitors’.
• The traditional company-centric approach to product innovation is
giving way to a world in which companies co-create products with
consumers.
• Companies are increasingly turning to “crowdsourcing” to generate
new ideas or, as we saw in the preceding chapter, to create
consumer-generated marketing campaigns.

Interacting with Others
• Crowdsourcing means inviting the Internet community to help
create content or software, often with prize money or a
moment of glory as an incentive.
• Lead users can be a good source of input, even when they
innovate products without the consent or knowledge of the
companies that produce them.
• Some companies, particularly those that want to appeal to hip
young consumers, bring their lead users into their product-design
process.

Lead users can be a good source of input when they innovate
products without the consent or even the knowledge of the
companies that produce them.
Young people who thrive on biking to the top of mountains gave inputs that led to the development
of mountain bikes—bikes that are sturdier and less likely to break down in such harsh terrains.

Interacting with Employees
• Employees can be a source of ideas for improving production,
products, and services.
• For examples on how Japanese businesses derive new ideas
from their employees.
• See “Marketing Insight: New-Idea Generation in Japanese
Companies.”

Studying Competitors
• Companies can also find good ideas by researching competitors’
products and services.
• They can find out what customers like and dislike about
competitors’ products.
• They can buy their competitors’ products, take them apart, and
build better ones.
• Company sales representatives and intermediaries are a particularly
good source of ideas. These groups have first-hand exposure to
customers and are often the first to learn about competitive
developments.

Adopting Creativity Techniques
• Internal brainstorming sessions also can be quite effective—if
conducted correctly.
• “Marketing Memo: How to Run a Successful Brainstorming Session”
provides some brainstorming guidelines.

Sampling of Techniques for Stimulating Creativity in
Individuals and Groups
a. Attribute listing
b. Forced relationships
c. Morphological analysis
d. Reverse assumption analysis
e. New contexts
f. Mind-mapping

Lateral Marketing
Increasingly, new product ideas arise from lateral marketing
that combines two product concepts or ideas to create a
new offering. Here are some successful examples:
– Gas station stores = gas stations + food
– Cybercafés = cafeteria + Internet
– Kinder Surprise = candy + toy
– iPod = audio + visual + portable

Kinder Surprise = candy + toy (example of lateral
marketing)

Using Idea Screening
• In screening ideas, the company must avoid two types of
errors.
• A DROP-error occurs when the company dismisses a good
idea.
• The purpose of screening is to drop poor ideas as early as
possible.
• The rationale is that product-development costs rise
substantially with each successive development stage.

Figure 20.2: Forces Fighting New Ideas

Using Idea Screening
• Most companies require new-product ideas to be described on
a standard form for a new-product committee’s review. The
description states the product idea, the target market, and
the competition and roughly estimates market size, product
price, development time and costs, manufacturing costs, and
rate of return.
• The surviving ideas can be rated using a weighted-index
method.
• See Table 20.3.

Table 20.3: Product-Idea Rating Device

Idea Screening: The Probability of Success
• As the idea moves through development, the company will
constantly need to revise its estimate of the product’s overall
probability of success using the following formula:
64
Overall Probability Probability of Probability of
Probability = of technical X commercialization X economic
of Success completion given technical success given
completion commercialization
© Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 2013. All rights reserved

Innovation at McDonalds (India Market)
In India, McDonald’s innovates its menu to cater to local tastes. Workshops are held annually
involving management, the innovation team, chefs, suppliers, and even seasoning companies, to
develop new product ideas such as McVeggies and eggless pancakes.

MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:
CONCEPT TO STRATEGY
66

Product Idea and Product Concept
• Attractive ideas must be refined into testable product
concepts.
• A product idea is a possible product the company might
offer to the market.
• A product concept is an elaborated version of the idea
expressed in consumer terms.

Product Concept
• A product idea can be turned into several concepts.
• Questions to ask include:
1. Who will use this product?
2. What primary benefit should this product provide?
3. When will people consume this product?

Examples of Concepts for a Product
• Concept 1—An instant breakfast drink for adults who want a
quick nutritious breakfast without preparation.
• Concept 2—A tasty snack drink for children to drink as a
midday refreshment.
• Concept 3—A health supplement for older adults to drink in
the late evening before they go to bed.

Product Concept
• Each concept represents a category concept that defines the
product’s competition.
• Next, the product concept has to be turned into a brand
concept. The brand-positioning map helps the company to
decide how much to charge and how calorific to make its
drink.

Figure 20.3: Product and Brand Positioning

Concept Testing
• Concept testing involves presenting the product concept to
target consumers, and getting their reactions.
• The concepts can be presented symbolically or physically.
• The more the tested concepts resemble the final product or
experience, the more dependable concept testing is.

Concept Testing
• Concept testing of prototypes can help avoid costly mistakes,
but it may be especially challenging with radically different,
new-to-the-world products.
• Visualization techniques can help respondents match their
mental state with what might occur when they are actually
evaluating or choosing the new product.

Concept Testing
• In the past, creating physical prototypes was costly and time-consuming,
but computer-aided design and manufacturing programs have changed
that.
• Today firms can use rapid prototyping to design products (e.g., small
appliances or toys) on a computer, and then produce plastic models of
each.
• Potential consumers can view the plastic models and give their reactions.
• Companies are also using virtual reality to test product concepts. Virtual
reality programs use computers and sensory devices (such as gloves or
goggles) to simulate reality.

An Example of an Articulated Product Concept
• Our product is a powdered mixture that is added to milk to
make an instant breakfast that gives a person all the needed
nutrition along with good taste and high convenience.
• The product would be offered in three flavours (chocolate,
vanilla, and strawberry) and would come in individual
packets, six to a box, at $2.49 a box.

Measuring Product Dimensions (arising from the
articulated product concept)
1. Communicability and believability—Are the benefits clear to you and
believable? If the scores are low, the concept must be refined or revised.
2. Need level—Do you see this product solving a problem or filling a need for
you? The stronger the need, the higher the expected consumer interest.
3. Gap level—Do other products currently meet this need and satisfy you?
The greater the gap, the higher the expected consumer interest. The need
level can be multiplied by the gap level to produce a need-gap score. A
high need-gap score means that the consumer sees the product as filling a
strong need that is not satisfied by available alternatives.

Measuring Product Dimensions (arising from the
articulated product concept)
4. Perceived value—Is the price reasonable in relation to the value? The
higher the perceived value, the higher the expected consumer interest.
5. Purchase intention—Would you (definitely, probably, probably not, or
definitely not) buy the product? This would be high for consumers who
answered the previous three questions positively.
6. User targets, purchase occasions, purchasing frequency—Who would use
this product, and when and how often will the product be used?

Conjoint Analysis
• Consumer preferences for alternative product concepts can be measured
through conjoint analysis, a method for deriving the utility values that
consumers attach to varying levels of a product’s attributes.
• Respondents are shown different hypothetical product offers formed by
combining varying levels of the attributes, then asked to rank these offers.
• From this ranking, management can identify the most appealing offer and
the least appealing offer, and determine the importance level of each
attribute.
• Management can then estimate the market share and profit the company
might realize from different product offers.

Conjoint Analysis
• The marketer now uses a statistical program to derive the consumer’s
utility functions for each of the five attributes.
• See Figure 20.4.
• We can also determine the relative importance of each attribute to this
consumer—the difference between the highest and lowest utility level for
that attribute.
• The greater the difference, the more important the attribute.
• Clearly, this consumer sees price and package design as the most
important attributes, followed by money-back guarantee, brand name, and
an ISO certification.

Figure 20.4: Utility Functions Based on Conjoint Analysis

Conjoint Analysis
• When preference data are collected from a sufficient sample
of target consumers, the data can be used to estimate the
market share any specific offer is likely to achieve, given any
assumptions about competitive response.
• The company, however, may not launch the market offer that
promises to gain the greatest market share because of cost
considerations.
• The most customer-appealing offer is not always the most
profitable offer to make.

Marketing Strategy Development
• Following a successful concept test, the new-product manager
will develop a preliminary strategy plan for introducing the
new product into the market.
• The plan consists of three parts.
• The first part describes the target market’s size, structure,
and behavior; the planned product positioning; and the sales,
market share, and profit goals sought in the first few years.

Example of Articulated Target Market and Profit
Goals
• The target market for the instant breakfast drink is families with
children who are receptive to a new, convenient, nutritious, and
inexpensive form of breakfast.
• The company’s brand will be positioned at the higher-price, higher-quality
end of the instant-breakfast-drink category. The company
will aim initially to sell 500,000 cases or 10 percent of the market,
with a loss in the first year not exceeding $1.3 million.
• In the second year, it will aim for 700,000 cases or 14 percent of
the market, with a planned profit of $2.2 million.

• The second part outlines the planned price, distribution
strategy, and marketing budget for the first year.
An example:
84
The product will be offered in chocolate, vanilla, and strawberry in individual packets of six
to a box at a retail price of $2.49 a box. There will be 48 boxes per case, and the case
price to distributors will be $24. For the first two months, dealers will be offered one case
free for every four cases bought, plus cooperative-advertising allowances. Free samples
will be distributed door-to-door. Coupons for 20 cents off will appear in newspapers. The
total sales-promotional budget will be $2.9 million. The advertising budget will be $6
million, two-thirds of which will go into television and one-third into newspapers.
Advertising copy will emphasize the benefit concepts of nutrition and convenience. The
advertising-execution concept will revolve around a small boy who consumes the instant
breakfast drink and grows strong. During the first year, $100,000 will be spent on
marketing research to buy store audits and consumer-panel information to monitor market
reaction and buying rates.

• The third part of the marketing-strategy plan describes the
long-run sales and profit goals, and marketing-mix strategy
over time.
An example:
85
The company intends to win a 25 percent market share and realize an after-tax return on
investment of 12 percent. To achieve this return, product quality will start high and be
improved over time through technical research. Price will initially be set at a high level
and lowered gradually to expand the market and meet competition. The total promotion
budget will be boosted each year by about 20 percent, with the initial advertising-sales
promotion split of 65:35 evolving eventually to 50:50. Marketing research will be reduced
to $60,000 per year after the first year.

Business Analysis
• After management develops the product concept and
marketing strategy, it can evaluate the proposal’s business
attractiveness.
• Management needs to prepare sales, cost, and profit
projections to determine whether they satisfy company
objectives.
• If they do, the concept can move to the development stage.
• As new information comes in, the business analysis will
undergo revision and expansion.

Estimating Total Sales
• Total estimated sales are the sum of estimated first-time sales,
replacement sales, and repeat sales. Sales-estimation methods depend on
whether the product is a one-time purchase (such as an engagement ring
or retirement home), an infrequently purchased product, or frequently
purchased product.
• For one-time purchased products, sales rise at the beginning, peak, and
later approach zero as the number of potential buyers is exhausted.
• See Figure 20.5(a).
• If new buyers keep entering the market, the curve will not go down to zero.

Figure 20.5 (a): Product Life-cycle—
One-time Purchased Product

• Infrequently purchased products—such as automobiles,
toasters, and industrial equipment—exhibit replacement
cycles dictated by physical wearing out or by obsolescence
associated with changing styles, features, and performance.
• Sales forecasting for this product category calls for estimating
first-time sales and replacement sales separately.
• See Figure 20.5(b).

Figure 20.5 (b): Product Life-Cycle—
Infrequently purchased product

• Frequently purchased products, such as consumer and industrial
non-durables, have product life-cycle sales resembling
• See Figure 20.5(c).
• The number of first-time buyers initially increases and then
decreases as fewer buyers are left (assuming a fixed population).
• Repeat purchases occur soon, providing that the product satisfies
some buyers.
• The sales curve eventually falls to a plateau representing a level of
steady repeat-purchase volume; by this time, the product is no
longer a new product.
91

Figure 20.5 (c): Product Life-Cycle—
frequently purchased product

• In estimating sales, the manager’s first task is to estimate first-time
purchases of the new product in each period.
• To estimate replacement sales, management has to research the product’s
survival-age distribution—that is, the number of units that fail in year
one, two, three, and so on. The low end of the distribution indicates when
the first replacement sales will take place.
• The actual timing will be influenced by a variety of factors.
• Because replacement sales are difficult to estimate before the product is in
use, some manufacturers base the decision to launch a new product solely
on the estimate of first-time sales.

Estimating Costs and Profits
• Costs are estimated by the R&D, manufacturing, marketing,
and finance departments.
• Table 20.4 illustrates a five-year projection of sales, costs,
and profits for the instant breakfast drink.

• Costs are estimated by the R&D, manufacturing, marketing, and finance
departments.
• The payback period here is approximately three and a half years.
• Management has to decide whether to risk a maximum investment loss of
$4.6 million and a possible payback period of three and a half years.
• Companies use other financial measures to evaluate the merit of a new-product
proposal.
• The simplest method is breakeven analysis.
• The more complex method is risk analysis.

MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS:
DEVELOPMENT TO COMMERCIALIZATION
The company will determine whether the product idea can
translate into a technically and commercially feasible product.

Development and Commercialization
• Up to now, the product has existed only as a word
description, a drawing, or a prototype.
• This next step involves a jump in investment that dwarfs the
costs incurred in the earlier stages.
• At this stage the company will determine whether the product
idea can be translated into a technically and commercially
feasible product. If it cannot, the accumulated project cost
will be lost except for any useful information gained in the
process.

Product Development
• The job of translating target customer requirements into a
working prototype is helped by a set of methods known as
quality function deployment (QFD).
• This methodology takes the list of desired customer attributes
(CAs) and turns them into:
i. A list of engineering attributes (EAs).
ii. A major contribution of QFD is that it improves communication
between marketers, engineers, and the manufacturing people.

Physical Prototypes
The goal of the R&D department is to find a prototype that:
i. Embodies the key attributes described in the product-concept
statement.
ii. Performs safely under normal use and conditions.
iii.Can be produced within the budgeted manufacturing costs.

Physical Prototypes
• With the emergence of the Web, there is a need for more
rapid prototyping and more flexible development processes.
• Lab scientists must also communicate the product’s
psychological aspects through physical cues.
• Marketers need to supply lab people with information on what
attributes consumers seek and how consumers judge whether
these attributes are present.

Customer Tests
• When the prototypes are ready, they must be put through
rigorous functional tests and consumer tests.
• Alpha testing is a name given to testing the product within
the company.
• Beta testing is testing the product with customers.

Customer Tests
• Women were invited to apply
P&G’s new lipstick, and return
eight hours later to measure
the remaining lip color.
• The result was a tube of
glossy moisturizer that
women applied on top of
their color that helped them
keep their lip color all day.

Market Testing
• After management is satisfied with functional and psychological
performance, the product is ready to be branded with a name, logo,
and packaging and go into a market test.
• Not all companies undertake market testing.
• Some Asian businesses do not undertake market testing, believing
that it is costly and might delay the launch of the product.
• Others feel that they are sufficiently familiar with the market to
bypass this stage or fear that competitors might get wind of their
new products and imitate them.

Market Testing
• Market testing can yield valuable information about buyers,
dealers, marketing program effectiveness, and market
potential.
• The main issues are:
i. How much market testing should be done
ii. What hat kind(s)?

Market Testing
• The amount of market testing is influenced by the investment cost
and risk on the one hand, and the time pressure and research cost
on the other.
• High investment-high risk products, where the chance of failure is
high, must be market tested; the cost of the market tests will be an
insignificant percentage of the total project cost.
• High-risk products—those that create new-product categories (first
instant breakfast drink) or have novel features (first gum-strengthening
toothpaste—warrant more market testing than
modified products (another toothpaste brand).

Consumer-goods Market Testing
• In testing consumer products, the company seeks to estimate
four variables:
i. Trial
ii. First repeat
iii. Adoption
iv. Purchase frequency
• There are four major methods of consumer-goods market
testing, from the least to most costly.

Sales-wave Research
• In sales-wave research, consumers who initially try the product at
no cost are re-offered the product, or a competitor’s product, at
slightly reduced prices.
• They might be offered the product as many as five times (sales
wave) with the company noting how many customers selected the
product again and their reported levels of satisfaction.
• Sales-wave research can also expose consumers to one or more
advertising concepts to see the impact of that advertising on repeat
purchases.

Sales-wave Research
• Advantages:
i. Implemented quickly
ii. Conducted with a fair amount of security
iii. Carried out without final packaging and advertising
• Disadvantages:
i. It does not indicate what trial rates would be achieved with
different sales-promotion incentives.
ii. Nor does it indicate the brand’s power to gain distribution and
favorable shelf positioning.

Simulated Test Marketing
• Simulated test marketing calls for finding 30 to 40 qualified
shoppers and questioning them about brand familiarity and
preferences in a specific product category.
• These people are then invited to a brief screening of both
well-known and new commercials or print ads.
• Consumers receive a small amount of money and are invited
into a store where they may buy any items they wish.
• The company notes how many consumers buy the new brand
and competing brands.

Simulated Test Marketing
• This provides a measure of the ad’s relative effectiveness
against competing ads in stimulating trial.
• This method gives fairly accurate results on advertising
effectiveness and trial rates in a shorter period of time.
• The results are incorporated into new-product forecasting
models to project ultimate sales levels.

Controlled Test Marketing
• In this method, a research firm manages a panel of stores
that will carry new products for a fee.
• The company specifies the number of stores and the
geographic locations it wants to test.
• The research firm delivers the product and controls shelf
positioning, the number of facings, displays, point-of-purchase
promotions, and pricing.

Controlled Test Marketing
• Controlled test marketing allows the company to test the
impact of in-store factors and limited advertising on buying
behavior.
• The controlled test market gives no information on how to sell
the trade on carrying the new product.
• This method also exposes the product to competition.

Test Markets
• The ultimate way to test a new consumer product is to put it
into full-blown test markets.
• The company chooses the cities; the sales force tries to sell
the trade on carrying the product and giving it good shelf
exposure.
• The company puts on a full advertising and promotion
campaign.
• The company can also test alternative marketing plans by
varying the marketing program in different cities.

Test Markets: Management Decisions
1. How many test cities—Most tests use between two and six cities. The
greater the maximum possible loss, the greater the number of contending
marketing strategies, the greater the regional differences, and the greater
the chance of test-market interference by competitors, the greater the
number of cities that should be used.
2. Which cities?—Company must develop selection criteria such as having
good media coverage, cooperative chain stores, and average competitive
activity.
3. Length of test?—Market tests last anywhere from a few months to a
year. The longer the average repurchase period, the longer the test period.

4. What information?—Warehouse shipment data will show
gross inventory buying but will not indicate weekly sales at
the retail level. Store audits will show retail sales and
competitors’ market shares but will not reveal buyer
characteristics. Consumer panels will indicate which people
are buying which brands and their loyalty and switching
rates. Buyer surveys will yield in-depth information about
consumer attitudes, usage, and satisfaction.

5. What action to take?—If the test markets show high trial
and repurchase rates, the product should be launched
nationally; if they show a high trial rate and a low
repurchase rate, the product should be redesigned or
dropped; if they show a low trial rate and a high repurchase
rate, the product is satisfying but more people have to try it.
This means increasing advertising and sales promotion. If
trial and repurchase rates are both low, the product should
be abandoned.

Business-goods Market Testing
• Business goods can also benefit from market testing.
• Expensive industrial goods and new technologies will normally undergo
alpha and beta testing (with vendors).
• A second common test method for business goods is to introduce the new
product at trade shows.
• New industrial products can be tested in distributor and dealer display
rooms.
• Industrial manufacturers come close to using full test marketing when they
give a limited supply of the product to the sales force to sell in a limited
number of areas that receive promotion support and printed catalog sheets.

Introducing New Business Products at Trade Shows

Commercialization
• If the company goes ahead with commercialization, it will face its
largest costs to date.
• The company will have to contract for manufacture or build or rent
a full-scale manufacturing facility.
• Another major cost is marketing. To introduce a major new
consumer packaged good into the market, the company will have to
spend a hefty amount in advertising, promotion, and other
communication in the first year.
• Most new-product campaigns rely on a sequenced mix of market
communication tools.

When (Timing)
• In commercializing a new product, market-entry timing is
critical.
• The company faces three choices:
i. First entry
ii. Parallel entry
iii. Late entry

When (Timing)
1. First entry—The first firm entering a market usually enjoys
the “first mover advantages” of locking up key distributors
and customers and gaining leadership. But if the product is
rushed to market before it is thoroughly debugged, the first
entry can backfire.
2. Parallel entry—The firm might time its entry to coincide with
the competitor’s entry. The market may pay more attention
when two companies are advertising the new product.

When (Timing)
3. Late entry—The firm might delay its launch until after the
competitor has entered. The competitor will have borne the
cost of educating the market, and its product may reveal
faults the late entrant can avoid. The late entrant can also
learn the size of the market.

When (Timing)
• If a new product replaces an older product, the company might
delay the introduction until the old product’s stock is drawn down.
• If the product is seasonal, it might be delayed until the right season
arrives; often a product waits for a “killer application” to occur.
• Complicating new product launches are “design-arounds”—rival
firms’ versions of a firm’s invention that are just different enough to
avoid patent infringement and the need to pay royalties.

Some companies take their time in introducing new
products, as in the case of Huawei.
Chinese tech giant Huawei takes its time to decide what new products it wants to make. But once it
has made its decision, it makes sure the new product will succeed.

Where (Geographic Strategy)
• The company must decide whether to launch the new product
in a single locality, a region, several regions, the national
market, or the international market.
• Most will develop a planned market rollout over time.
• Small companies will select an attractive city and put on a
blitz campaign, then enter other cities one at a time.
• Larger companies will introduce their products into a whole
region and then move to the next region.
• Some companies will launch their products to the national
market.
• Most companies design new products to sell primarily in the
domestic market.

Where (Geographic Strategy)
• With the Web connecting far-flung parts of the globe,
competition is more likely to cross national borders.
• Companies are increasingly rolling out new products
simultaneously across the globe, rather than nationally or
even regionally.
• However, masterminding a global launch poses challenges,
and a sequential rollout across countries may still be the best
option.

To Whom (Target-Market Prospects)
• Within the rollout markets, the company must target its initial
distribution and promotion to the best prospect groups.
• Presumably, the company has already profiled the prime
prospects, who would ideally have the following
characteristics:
– They would be early adopters, heavy users, and opinion leaders,
and they can be reached at a low cost.

To Whom (Target-Market Prospects)
• Few groups have all these characteristics.
• The company should rate the various prospect groups on
these characteristics and target the best group.
• The aim is to generate strong sales as soon as possible to
attract further prospects.

How (Introductory Market Strategy)
• The company must develop an action plan for introducing the new
product into the rollout markets.
• To coordinate the many activities involved in launching a new
product, management can use network-planning techniques such as
critical path scheduling (CPS).
• CPS calls for developing a master chart showing the simultaneous
and sequential activities that must take place to launch the product.
• Any delay in any activity on the critical path will cause the project
to be delayed. If the launch must be completed earlier, the planner
searches for ways to reduce time along the critical path.

The Consumer-adoption Process
• Adoption is an individual’s decision to become a regular user
of a product followed by the consumer-loyalty process.
• New-product marketers typically aim at early adopters and
use the theory of innovation diffusion and consumer
adoption to identify them.

Stages in the Adoption Process
• An innovation is any goods, service, or idea that is perceived
by someone as new. Innovations take time to spread through
the social system.
• Everett Rogers defines the innovation diffusion process as
“the spread of a new idea from its source of invention or
creation to its ultimate users or adopters.”
• The consumer-adoption process focuses on the mental
process through which an individual passes from first hearing
about an innovation to final adoption.

Adopters of new products have been observed to
move through five stages:
1. Awareness—The consumer becomes aware of the innovation but lacks
information about it.
2. Interest—The consumer is stimulated to seek information about the
innovation.
3. Evaluation—The consumer considers whether to try the innovation.
4. Trial—The consumer tries the innovation to improve his or her estimate of
its value.
5. Adoption—The consumer decides to make full and regular use of the
innovation.
133
The new-product marketers should facilitate movement
through these stages.

Factors Influencing the Adoption Process
Marketers recognize the following characteristics of the adoption
process:
a. differences in individual readiness to try new products;
b. the effect of personal influences;
c. differing rates of adoption; and
d. differences in organizations’ readiness to try new products.

Readiness to Try New Products and Personal
Influence
• Rogers defines a person’s level of innovativeness as “the
degree to which an individual is relatively earlier in adopting
new ideas than the other members of his social system.”
• In each product area, there are pioneers and early adopters.
• People can be classified into the adopter categories shown in
Figure 20.6.

Figure 20.6: Adopter Categorization on the Basis of
Relative Time of Adoption of Innovations

The Five Adopter Groups
1. Innovators are technology enthusiasts and are venturesome
and enjoy tinkering with new products and mastering their
intricacies. In return for low prices, they are happy to
conduct alpha and beta testing and report on early
weaknesses.
2. Early adopters are opinion leaders who carefully search for
new technologies that might give them a dramatic
competitive advantage. They are less price-sensitive and
willing to adopt the product if given personalized solutions
and good service support.

The Five Adopter Groups
3. Early majority are deliberate pragmatists who adopt the new
technology when its benefits are proven and a lot of adoption
has already taken place. They make up the mainstream
market.
4. Late majority are skeptical conservatives who are risk-averse,
technology-shy, and price-sensitive.
5. Laggards are tradition-bound and resist the innovation until
they find that the status quo is no longer defensible.

Asian Perspective on Personal Influence on
Innovation Adoption
• Asians may be more susceptible to personal influence than
American consumers.
• Because Confucianism is part of their background, East Asians
are more collectivistic and motivated toward conforming to
the norms of their reference groups.
• However, the impact of personal influence varies across Asian
consumers and products.

Asian Perspective on Personal Influence on
Innovation Adoption
• High-context Asian societies like Japan, South Korea, and
Taiwan have homogeneous populations sharing similar
cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds.
• The transfer of ideas occurs more frequently between
individuals under these similar circumstances than, say, in
Singapore, where there are more subcultures.

Internet Adoption
• Similarly, a study on Internet adoption in 50 countries
showed that countries high on individualism had a greater
rate of Internet adoption than countries that were more
collectivistic.
• Internet adoption also increases as power distance decreases.
This means that the more the exchange between people of
different statuses, the greater the level of Internet adoption.
• Countries that tended to avoid uncertainty adopted the
Internet less than those that were more inclined to embrace
uncertainty.

Characteristics of the Innovation
• Some products catch on immediately, whereas others take a
long time to gain acceptance. Five characteristics influence
the rate of adoption of an innovation:
1. Relative advantage—the degree to which the innovation appears
superior to existing products.
2. Compatibility—the degree to which the innovation matches the
values and experiences of the individuals.
3. Complexity—the degree to which the innovation is relatively
difficult to understand or use.
4. Divisibility—the degree to which the innovation can be tried on a
limited basis.
5. Communicability—the degree to which the beneficial results of
use are observable or describable to others.

Characteristics of the Innovation
• Other characteristics that influence the rate of adoption are
cost, risk and uncertainty, scientific credibility, and social
approval.
• The new-product marketer has to research all these factors
and give the key ones maximum attention in designing the
new product and its marketing program.

Organizations’ Readiness to Adopt Innovations
• Adoption is associated with variables in the organization’s
environment (community progressiveness, community
income), the organization itself (size, profits, pressure to
change), and the administrators (education level, age,
sophistication).
• Other forces come into play in trying to get a product adopted
into organizations that receive the bulk of their funding from
the government, such as public schools.
• A controversial or innovative product can be squelched by
negative public opinion.

Mma6e chapter-20 final

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Mma6e chapter-20 final

Similar to Mma6e chapter-20 final (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Mma6e chapter-20 final