This document contains a list of 67 company or organization names along with their addresses. Many of the names contain terms related to intellectual property such as "patent", "trademark", and "intellectual property". However, several consumer protection organizations have warned that some of these companies listed may be attempting to mislead consumers into believing they are official intellectual property offices when they are not. The document appears to be cataloging potentially misleading organizations.
Bitcoin Mining Forum Australia | http://btcwarriors.com/
Bitcoin is a virtual money and has no physical shape. It just exists as code behind some extraordinary PCs and we are only allowed to get to it through digital wallets. Bitcoin is a digital asset designed by its investor, Satoshi Nakamoto, to work as a currency. It is commonly referred to with terms like digital currency, digital cash, virtual currency, electronic currency or cryptocurrency.
„Trimitere preliminară – Apropierea legislațiilor – Drept de autor și drepturi conexe – Societatea informațională – Directiva 2001/29/CE – Site internet care pune la dispoziția publicului opere cinematografice fără consimțământul titularilor unui drept conex dreptului de autor – Articolul 8 alineatul (3) – Noțiunea «intermediari ale căror servicii sunt folosite de către terți pentru a contraface dreptul de autor sau un drept conex» – Furnizor de acces la internet – Ordonanță adresată unui furnizor de acces la internet prin care i se interzice să permită accesul clienților săi la un site internet – Echilibru între drepturile fundamentale”
Programa şcolară pentru disciplina opţională educaţie pentru drepturile de pr...Monica Lupașcu
Programa şcolară a disciplinei Educaţie pentru drepturile de proprietate intelectuală reprezintă o ofertă curriculară de disciplină opţională pentru liceu, proiectată pentru un buget de timp de 1 oră/săptămână, pe durata unui an şcolar. Disciplina poate fi predată în oricare dintre clasele de liceu, în condiţiile adecvării demersului didactic la particularităţile de vârstă ale elevilor.
Amicus curiae la obiecția de neconstituționalitate împotriva legii înregistră...Monica Lupașcu
Argumentele aduse de APTI și APADOR-CH în susținerea obiecției de neconstituționalitate a Legii pentru modificarea Ordonanței de Urgență a Guvernului nr. 111/2011 privind comunicațiile electronice
This amicus brief was submitted by IBM in the Supreme Court case Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International. IBM argues that the question of whether computer-implemented inventions such as software are patent eligible under Section 101 should be beyond dispute. The current jurisprudence applying the "abstract idea" exception to Section 101 has proven unworkable and fails to provide clear guidance. IBM urges the Court to find that computer-implemented inventions are patent eligible subject matter under Section 101 and that concerns about overbroad patents are better addressed through the non-abstract Section 103 obviousness analysis.
This document is an amicus brief filed in support of the petitioner in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank. The brief argues that computer-implemented inventions should not be deemed ineligible for patent protection under Section 101 as long as they are novel, non-obvious, and not directed at scientific truths. The brief contends that approaches suggested by some opinions below that could render many computer-implemented inventions ineligible are based on outdated views of computers and software. The brief aims to ensure that legitimate patents covering innovative computer-implemented inventions across many industries remain eligible for patent protection.
Bitcoin Mining Forum Australia | http://btcwarriors.com/
Bitcoin is a virtual money and has no physical shape. It just exists as code behind some extraordinary PCs and we are only allowed to get to it through digital wallets. Bitcoin is a digital asset designed by its investor, Satoshi Nakamoto, to work as a currency. It is commonly referred to with terms like digital currency, digital cash, virtual currency, electronic currency or cryptocurrency.
„Trimitere preliminară – Apropierea legislațiilor – Drept de autor și drepturi conexe – Societatea informațională – Directiva 2001/29/CE – Site internet care pune la dispoziția publicului opere cinematografice fără consimțământul titularilor unui drept conex dreptului de autor – Articolul 8 alineatul (3) – Noțiunea «intermediari ale căror servicii sunt folosite de către terți pentru a contraface dreptul de autor sau un drept conex» – Furnizor de acces la internet – Ordonanță adresată unui furnizor de acces la internet prin care i se interzice să permită accesul clienților săi la un site internet – Echilibru între drepturile fundamentale”
Programa şcolară pentru disciplina opţională educaţie pentru drepturile de pr...Monica Lupașcu
Programa şcolară a disciplinei Educaţie pentru drepturile de proprietate intelectuală reprezintă o ofertă curriculară de disciplină opţională pentru liceu, proiectată pentru un buget de timp de 1 oră/săptămână, pe durata unui an şcolar. Disciplina poate fi predată în oricare dintre clasele de liceu, în condiţiile adecvării demersului didactic la particularităţile de vârstă ale elevilor.
Amicus curiae la obiecția de neconstituționalitate împotriva legii înregistră...Monica Lupașcu
Argumentele aduse de APTI și APADOR-CH în susținerea obiecției de neconstituționalitate a Legii pentru modificarea Ordonanței de Urgență a Guvernului nr. 111/2011 privind comunicațiile electronice
This amicus brief was submitted by IBM in the Supreme Court case Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International. IBM argues that the question of whether computer-implemented inventions such as software are patent eligible under Section 101 should be beyond dispute. The current jurisprudence applying the "abstract idea" exception to Section 101 has proven unworkable and fails to provide clear guidance. IBM urges the Court to find that computer-implemented inventions are patent eligible subject matter under Section 101 and that concerns about overbroad patents are better addressed through the non-abstract Section 103 obviousness analysis.
This document is an amicus brief filed in support of the petitioner in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank. The brief argues that computer-implemented inventions should not be deemed ineligible for patent protection under Section 101 as long as they are novel, non-obvious, and not directed at scientific truths. The brief contends that approaches suggested by some opinions below that could render many computer-implemented inventions ineligible are based on outdated views of computers and software. The brief aims to ensure that legitimate patents covering innovative computer-implemented inventions across many industries remain eligible for patent protection.
Study On The Quality Of The Patent System in Europe Enndbaf03
This study is dedicated to a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the patent system in Europe. An effective system for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights represents an essential element for the growth of economies, which are based on the generation and exploitation of new scientific and technological knowledge. The well-known risks of market failures in the private financing of innovation investments call for a continuous effort of policy makers to the improvements of the tools that are expected to guarantee proper private returns from R&D activities while protecting also the interests of consumers and society at large. The increased salience of patents to companies competing in the knowledge economy has raised concerns throughout the world in the past decade about the actual effectiveness of the current patent systems.
Introduction to intellectual property handloutJane Lambert
This document provides an introduction to intellectual property basics, including patents, trademarks, registered designs, unregistered design rights, copyright, rights in performances, laws of confidence, and passing off. It explains how some intellectual property rights arise spontaneously while others must be registered with intellectual property offices in the UK, Europe, or other countries. Useful services are also listed, such as intellectual property offices, patent information units, help for inventors, and sources of funding.
João Raoul, GAPRES SA
Chapter 2 - Introduction to the RC building example. Modeling and analysis of the design example
Paulo Bisch, University of Liège, Belgium
Chapter 3 - Specific rules for design and detailing of concrete building. Design for DCM and DCH. Illustration of elements design
Marios Fardis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Chapter 4 - Introduction to the RC building example. Modeling and analysis of the design example
Eduardo C. Carvalho, GAPRES SA, Chairman
Chapter 5 - Specific rules for the design and detailing of steel buildings:
(i) Steel moment resisting frames
(ii) Composite steel
Epo info resources & espacenet & search techniquesLATIPAT
The document provides an overview of the European Patent Office (EPO) including its 38 member states, 5 office locations, roles in the patent system such as processing applications and conducting appeal proceedings, and other services including online patent information and training programs. It also includes background information on the history of patents dating back to 1421 and key dates and events in patent law. Tables show leading patent applicants and patentees in 2010 and international patent classification systems.
Epo info resources & espacenet & search techniquesLATIPAT
The document provides an overview of the European Patent Office (EPO) including its 38 member states, 5 office locations, roles and services. It describes how European patent applications can be filed and processed at the EPO for patent protection across member states. Key services mentioned include patent searches, filing fees, and training resources available through the EPO.
The document discusses free web-based patent databases available through esp@cenet. Esp@cenet provides access to over 45 million patent documents from the European Patent Office and other patent offices around the world. It allows users to perform basic and advanced searches. The presentation also reviews other international patent databases from countries and regions like China, Germany, Japan, and WIPO.
Comparative view of the data mining exceptionsMonica Lupașcu
This document discusses proposed amendments to directives regarding copyright exceptions for text and data mining (TDM) for research, education, and cultural heritage preservation. It notes that new technologies enable automated analysis of large amounts of digital information through TDM, but the current optional exceptions create legal uncertainty for research organizations conducting TDM. The proposals aim to introduce mandatory exceptions for TDM used for scientific research, teaching, and cultural heritage preservation to address this issue.
Public domain protection. Uses and reuses of public domain worksMonica Lupașcu
This study tries to highlight the necessity of an awareness of the right of access to the public domain, particularly using the example of works whose protection period has expired, as well as the ones which the law considers to be excluded from protection. Such works are used not only by large libraries from around the world, but also by rights holders, via different means of use, including incorporations into original works or adaptations. However, the reuse that follows these uses often only remains at the level of concept, as the notion of the public’s right of access to public domain works is not substantiated, nor is the notion of the correct or legal use of such works.
Assessing the economic impacts of adapting certain limitations and exceptions...Monica Lupașcu
The document provides an analysis of policy options related to exceptions and limitations to copyright in the EU in light of technological advances. It assesses options for remote access and preservation by cultural heritage institutions, e-lending by libraries, text and data mining, and private copying. For each topic, it analyzes the current landscape, rationale for exceptions, and impact of different policy options, providing summaries of the assessment of key options in tables. The overall findings provide guidance on balancing broader access to works with preserving incentives for content creation under different policy scenarios.
Judgment of the Court_ the right to be forgottenMonica Lupașcu
This document is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding a request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of personal data. The case involved a complaint against Google Spain and Google Inc. by an individual seeking to remove personal data relating to him from search results. The Court held that:
1) Internet search engine operators are subject to Directive 95/46 when they process personal data of EU citizens through their search engines, even if the operators are not established in the EU.
2) Search engine operators must remove links to web pages containing personal data from search results if the data subject requests removal of the links for certain reasons such as the data being inadequate
Press release court of justice the right to be forgottenMonica Lupașcu
The Court of Justice ruled that an internet search engine operator is responsible under EU data protection law for processing personal data found on third party websites. It held that search engines like Google collect, organize and store personal data through their indexing programs, amounting to processing under the law. The operator must ensure its activities comply with requirements to protect individuals' privacy and personal data. The Court also ruled that search engines may be required to remove links to third party web pages containing personal information from search results at an individual's request, if keeping the links would be incompatible with EU law due to the information being inadequate, irrelevant or excessive.
Corrected Brief of Amici Curiae Computer Scientist in support of Defendant- C...Monica Lupașcu
This document is an amicus brief submitted by computer scientists in support of Google in the Oracle v. Google case. It argues that excluding APIs from copyright protection is essential to the development of modern computing in three key ways: 1) It enabled compatibility standards that drove competition and innovation; 2) It spurred the creation of new software by allowing programmers to freely build upon existing APIs; 3) It avoids an "orphan software" problem by protecting both developers and users when a company stops supporting a platform. The brief provides examples of how uncopyrightable APIs were critical to innovations like the PC, UNIX, C programming, the internet, and cloud computing.
This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Oracle America, Inc. and Google Inc. regarding Google's alleged copyright infringement of Oracle's Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in developing the Android mobile operating system. The jury found that Google infringed Oracle's copyrights in 37 Java API packages and a specific computer routine, but deadlocked on Google's fair use defense. The district court later ruled that the replicated elements of the 37 API packages were not copyrightable. Oracle appealed and Google cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's copyrightability ruling, remanded for consideration of fair use, and affirmed other district court rulings.
Study On The Quality Of The Patent System in Europe Enndbaf03
This study is dedicated to a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the patent system in Europe. An effective system for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights represents an essential element for the growth of economies, which are based on the generation and exploitation of new scientific and technological knowledge. The well-known risks of market failures in the private financing of innovation investments call for a continuous effort of policy makers to the improvements of the tools that are expected to guarantee proper private returns from R&D activities while protecting also the interests of consumers and society at large. The increased salience of patents to companies competing in the knowledge economy has raised concerns throughout the world in the past decade about the actual effectiveness of the current patent systems.
Introduction to intellectual property handloutJane Lambert
This document provides an introduction to intellectual property basics, including patents, trademarks, registered designs, unregistered design rights, copyright, rights in performances, laws of confidence, and passing off. It explains how some intellectual property rights arise spontaneously while others must be registered with intellectual property offices in the UK, Europe, or other countries. Useful services are also listed, such as intellectual property offices, patent information units, help for inventors, and sources of funding.
João Raoul, GAPRES SA
Chapter 2 - Introduction to the RC building example. Modeling and analysis of the design example
Paulo Bisch, University of Liège, Belgium
Chapter 3 - Specific rules for design and detailing of concrete building. Design for DCM and DCH. Illustration of elements design
Marios Fardis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Chapter 4 - Introduction to the RC building example. Modeling and analysis of the design example
Eduardo C. Carvalho, GAPRES SA, Chairman
Chapter 5 - Specific rules for the design and detailing of steel buildings:
(i) Steel moment resisting frames
(ii) Composite steel
Epo info resources & espacenet & search techniquesLATIPAT
The document provides an overview of the European Patent Office (EPO) including its 38 member states, 5 office locations, roles in the patent system such as processing applications and conducting appeal proceedings, and other services including online patent information and training programs. It also includes background information on the history of patents dating back to 1421 and key dates and events in patent law. Tables show leading patent applicants and patentees in 2010 and international patent classification systems.
Epo info resources & espacenet & search techniquesLATIPAT
The document provides an overview of the European Patent Office (EPO) including its 38 member states, 5 office locations, roles and services. It describes how European patent applications can be filed and processed at the EPO for patent protection across member states. Key services mentioned include patent searches, filing fees, and training resources available through the EPO.
The document discusses free web-based patent databases available through esp@cenet. Esp@cenet provides access to over 45 million patent documents from the European Patent Office and other patent offices around the world. It allows users to perform basic and advanced searches. The presentation also reviews other international patent databases from countries and regions like China, Germany, Japan, and WIPO.
Comparative view of the data mining exceptionsMonica Lupașcu
This document discusses proposed amendments to directives regarding copyright exceptions for text and data mining (TDM) for research, education, and cultural heritage preservation. It notes that new technologies enable automated analysis of large amounts of digital information through TDM, but the current optional exceptions create legal uncertainty for research organizations conducting TDM. The proposals aim to introduce mandatory exceptions for TDM used for scientific research, teaching, and cultural heritage preservation to address this issue.
Public domain protection. Uses and reuses of public domain worksMonica Lupașcu
This study tries to highlight the necessity of an awareness of the right of access to the public domain, particularly using the example of works whose protection period has expired, as well as the ones which the law considers to be excluded from protection. Such works are used not only by large libraries from around the world, but also by rights holders, via different means of use, including incorporations into original works or adaptations. However, the reuse that follows these uses often only remains at the level of concept, as the notion of the public’s right of access to public domain works is not substantiated, nor is the notion of the correct or legal use of such works.
Assessing the economic impacts of adapting certain limitations and exceptions...Monica Lupașcu
The document provides an analysis of policy options related to exceptions and limitations to copyright in the EU in light of technological advances. It assesses options for remote access and preservation by cultural heritage institutions, e-lending by libraries, text and data mining, and private copying. For each topic, it analyzes the current landscape, rationale for exceptions, and impact of different policy options, providing summaries of the assessment of key options in tables. The overall findings provide guidance on balancing broader access to works with preserving incentives for content creation under different policy scenarios.
Judgment of the Court_ the right to be forgottenMonica Lupașcu
This document is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding a request for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of personal data. The case involved a complaint against Google Spain and Google Inc. by an individual seeking to remove personal data relating to him from search results. The Court held that:
1) Internet search engine operators are subject to Directive 95/46 when they process personal data of EU citizens through their search engines, even if the operators are not established in the EU.
2) Search engine operators must remove links to web pages containing personal data from search results if the data subject requests removal of the links for certain reasons such as the data being inadequate
Press release court of justice the right to be forgottenMonica Lupașcu
The Court of Justice ruled that an internet search engine operator is responsible under EU data protection law for processing personal data found on third party websites. It held that search engines like Google collect, organize and store personal data through their indexing programs, amounting to processing under the law. The operator must ensure its activities comply with requirements to protect individuals' privacy and personal data. The Court also ruled that search engines may be required to remove links to third party web pages containing personal information from search results at an individual's request, if keeping the links would be incompatible with EU law due to the information being inadequate, irrelevant or excessive.
Corrected Brief of Amici Curiae Computer Scientist in support of Defendant- C...Monica Lupașcu
This document is an amicus brief submitted by computer scientists in support of Google in the Oracle v. Google case. It argues that excluding APIs from copyright protection is essential to the development of modern computing in three key ways: 1) It enabled compatibility standards that drove competition and innovation; 2) It spurred the creation of new software by allowing programmers to freely build upon existing APIs; 3) It avoids an "orphan software" problem by protecting both developers and users when a company stops supporting a platform. The brief provides examples of how uncopyrightable APIs were critical to innovations like the PC, UNIX, C programming, the internet, and cloud computing.
This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case between Oracle America, Inc. and Google Inc. regarding Google's alleged copyright infringement of Oracle's Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in developing the Android mobile operating system. The jury found that Google infringed Oracle's copyrights in 37 Java API packages and a specific computer routine, but deadlocked on Google's fair use defense. The district court later ruled that the replicated elements of the 37 API packages were not copyrightable. Oracle appealed and Google cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's copyrightability ruling, remanded for consideration of fair use, and affirmed other district court rulings.
Judgement of the Court - Data retention DirectiveMonica Lupașcu
This document summarizes Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks services. Some key points:
1) The Directive requires providers of publicly available electronic communications services or public communications networks to retain certain data (including traffic and location data) generated by communications for a period of 6 months to 2 years.
2) The data retention is intended to allow law enforcement access to the data for investigations related to serious crime and terrorism.
3) The Directive was intended to harmonize data retention laws across EU member states and ensure an adequate level of data retention to assist law enforcement
The Court of Justice declares the Data Retention Directive invalid for the following reasons:
1. The directive requires the retention of traffic and communications metadata that reveals extensive private details about individuals.
2. This wide-ranging interference with privacy and data protection rights is not limited to what is strictly necessary.
3. While fighting serious crime is a valid objective, the directive exceeds the limits of proportionality by indiscriminately covering all individuals and data without distinction or safeguards. It fails to ensure access and use of retained data is targeted and overseen.
Hotărâre fond take two vs. s.c. rock stars interactiveMonica Lupașcu
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against developing mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like anxiety and depression.
Raport de expertiza tehnica extrajudiciaraMonica Lupașcu
A empresa de tecnologia anunciou um novo smartphone com câmera aprimorada, maior tela e melhor desempenho. O dispositivo também possui um preço mais acessível em comparação aos modelos anteriores para atrair mais consumidores. O lançamento ocorrerá no próximo mês e a empresa espera que o novo smartphone ajude a aumentar suas vendas e participação no mercado.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
1. 1
Samples of misleading invoices
INDEX
• Central Patent & Trademark Database …………………………………………..………………………….. 4
• Commercial Centre for Industry and Trade
(Wirtschaftszentrale für Industri und Gewerbe AG) ………………………….…………………………….. 5
• COMMUNITY TRADE MARK FILING SERVICE ………………………….……………………………….. 6
• CPTD - Central Patent & Trademak Database
Companies Directory of Commerce, Trade and Industry ………………………….………………………. 7
• C.R.P. S.L. International Publication …………………………………….…………….……………………. 8
• ECTMF - European Communities Trademark Filing Services …………………….……………………… 9
• ECTO GmbH ………………………………………………………….………………………………………… 10
• ECTO S.A., Brussel, EU Parliament ………………………………….……………………………………… 11
• European Patent Agency ………………………………………………………….………………………….. 12
• European Trade marks and Designs, Register Community Trade marks ……….……………………… 13
• European Trademark organisation S.A. Brussells, EU Parliament …………….………………………… 14
• EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS CONSULTING, Register Community Trade marks .……………………. 15
• FIPTR - Federated institute for Patent & Trademark Registry ………….………………………………… 16
• GAIA almanch Ltd …………….……………………………………………………………………………….. 17
• I.B.F.T.P.R
International Bureau for Federated Trademark & Patent Register, LLC ………………………………… 18
• IBIP - International Bureau for Intellectual Property, LLC ………………….………................................ 19
• Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. ………………………………………….…………….............................. 20
• IOPTS - INTERNATIONAL PATENT & TRADEMAK SERVICE, LLC
Register Community Trademarks ………………………………………….…………………………………. 21
• OHMI Office for International registration, TRADEMARKS AND DESIGN ……….………………………. 22
• Patent Trademark Register, Register of International Patents …………….………………………………. 23
2. 2
• TM Worldwide Lp. ……………….…………………………………………………………………………… 24
• TM-Collection ………………………….……………………………………………………………………… 25
• TRADEMARK PUBLISHER GMBH …………………………….…………………………………………… 26
• WBIP - World Bureau Intellectual Property Inc. ………………………….………………………………… 27
• WDTP - Worldwide Database of Trademarks and Patents ……………………….…............................. 28
• W.O.I.P - Globex World Organisation Intellectual Property Ltd. ………………..………………………... 29
• EPTR - EUROPEAN PATENT AND TRADEMARK REGISTER ……………………............................ 30
• W.B.I.P……………………..................................................................................................................... 31
• WIPT - World Patents Trademarks, Register of International Patents and Trademarks……………… 32
• IOPR - Intellectual Office Property Register, Beaverton…………………………………………………… 33
• UPTS - Registration of the International Trademark……………………………………………………….. 34
• TM-Edition International Catalogue of Trademarks – 2013……………………………………………….. 35
• IPTR - International Patent and Trademark Register ……………………………………………………… 36
• FOIP - Federated Organization for Intellectual Property…………………………………………………… 37
• IPT Trademarks…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 38
• E P T O S.A. …………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… 39
• F.O.I.P Register of Community Trademarks …………………………………………………………………. 40
• IPTMR – INTERNATIONAL PATENT AND TRADE MARK REGISTER ..………………………………... 41
• WIPP – World Intellectual Property Publishers…………………………… ..……………………………….. 42
• TPS – Trademark and Patent Service…………………………………………………… 43
• CP S.L. Publicación Companias Marcas Internationales …………………………………………………. 44
• IPT DESIGNS sro………………………………………………………………………………………………. 45
• Marcasonline.pt…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 46
• EOOD Patent und Markendienst……………………………………………………………………………….. 47
• European Patent Portal………………………………………………………………………………………….. 48
• ITMPR – INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARKS AND PATENTS REGISTER……………………………….. 49
• TPR – EUROPEAN TRADEMARK PUBLICATION REGISTER……………………………………………. 50
• ITPS - International Trademark and Patent Service………………………………………………………….. 51
• ITIPR – INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTER…………… 52
• Wellington Publication S.L………………………………………………………………………………………. 53
3. 3
• European Trademark Register………………………………………………………………………………….. 54
• TM Publisher……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 55
• Agence européenne des marques…………………………………………………………………………….. 56
• IPTG - International Patent and Trademark Guide…………………………………………………………… 57
• Patent & Trademark Agency Ltd………………………………………………………………………………... 58
• IRO - International Registration Office…………………………………………………………………………. 59
• IP Data s.r.o………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 60
• IPT-Register s.r.o………………………………………………………………………………………………… 61
• Varemerke Byrå…………………………………………………………………………………………………... 62
• Varemerkeorganisasjonen AS………………………………………………………………………………….. 63
• Wellington Publication S.L………………………………………………………………………………………. 64
• WIPP-World Intellectual Property Publisher…………………………………………………………………… 65
• World Trade Register…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 66
• OHIM-ORGANIZATION FOR HARMONIZING IN THE INTERN. MARKET………………………………. 67
4. 4
Central Patent & Trademark Database
CD CTI Limited
610 Nathan Road
Hollywood Plaz Room 813
Kowloon, Hong Kong
5. 5
Commercial Centre for Industry and Trade
(Wirtschaftszentrale für Industri und Gewerbe AG)
P.O. Box 2116
CH-8033 Zürich
6. 6
COMMUNITY TRADE MARK FILING SERVICE
17-19 Fenwick Street
Liverpool
L2 7LS
United Kingdom
7. 7
CPTD - Central Patent & Trademak Database
Companies Directory of Commerce, Trade and Industry