Community Health
Workers:
the State of the Evidence
Ashley Wennerstrom, PhD, MPH, Tulane Schoos of Medicine - New Orleans
Carl H. Rush, MRP, University of Texas School of Public Health - Atlanta
Samantha Sabo, DrPH, MPH, University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College
of Public Health - Scottsdale
9/2/2015 1
Topics
 Definitions
 Why CHWs now?
 What CHWs do – and the skills required
 State of the Evidence
 Activity at the federal and state levels
 Key challenges in CHW policy and workforce
sustainability
9/2/2015 2
What’s your definition of CHW?
39/2/2015
Community Health Worker Definition
American Public Health Association
 The CHW is a frontline public health worker who is a
trusted member of and/or has an unusually close
understanding of the community served.
 This trusting relationship enables the CHW to serve as a
liaison/link/intermediary between health/social services and
the community to facilitate access to services and improve
the quality and cultural competence of service delivery.
(cont’d)
49/2/2015
Community Health Worker Definition
American Public Health Association
 The CHW also builds individual and community capacity by
increasing health knowledge and self-sufficiency through a
range of activities such as:
 outreach
 community education
 informal counseling, social support and
 advocacy.
APHA CHW Section, 2006
9/2/2015 5
CHWs are unlike other
health-related professions
 Do not provide clinical care
 Generally do not hold another professional
license
 Expertise is based on shared life experience
and (usually) culture with the population
served
(cont’d)
69/2/2015
CHWs are unlike other
health-related professions
 Rely on relationships and trust more than on
clinical expertise
 Relate to community members as peers rather
than purely as client
 Can achieve certain results more effectively
than other professionals
79/2/2015
Why CHWs Now?
9/2/2015 8
Why are we discussing CHWs?
 Growing diversity of U.S. population
 Growing prevalence of chronic diseases
 Growing complexity of health care
 Cost pressures on health care system
 Shortages of clinical personnel
 Commitment to reducing health inequities
 Recognition of social/behavioral determinants of health
 Growing experience/evidence base with CHWs
9/2/2015 9
Why are we discussing CHWs?
 The “Triple Aim”
 Improving the patient experience of care (including quality
and satisfaction);
 Improving the health of populations; and
 Reducing the per capita cost of health care
 Health care reform: changing accountability for
outcomes: CHW as members of health care teams
 Accountable care organizations (ACOs)
 Patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs)
 Incentives to reduce costs, improve care
9/2/2015 10
CHWs can be the integrators!
Health Care
Individual Level
Disease Research
& Intervention
Public
Health
SDOH
research &
intervention
IOM. 2013. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, poorer health. Washington DC: The National
Academies Press.
Social determinants
have not been
integrated in clinic
practice or health
care systems
Leads
to lower value,
substandard care
9/2/2015 11
What’s happening in the States -
and at the federal level?
9/2/2015 12
9/2/2015 13
9/2/2015 14
9/2/2015 15
Worker  Direct Care* 
Care Coordination/
Health Promotion  
Population­Based 
Prevention/
Outreach/ 
Health Promotion  
Payment Options   Reporting  
CHW 
PWS 
NAV 
X 
X 
X 
  PCPCH Payment 
or 
CCO‐ICM Capitation  
Documentation in  
Medical Record  
CHW 
PWS 
NAV 
  X 
X 
X 
CCO‐ICM Capitation 
Or 
CCO Sub‐Contracted Entity  
CCO Reports  
Expenditures on  
Financial Report **  
Doula  X    Payment to Provider, Hospital 
or Birthing Center is enhanced 
when Doula is utilized  
FFS Claim for Delivery is billed 
with modifier 
 
CCO reimbursement is depend‐
ent on the business practice of 
the plan  
CHW‐Community Health Worker; PWS‐Peer Wellness Specialist; NAV‐Personal Health Navigator 
*Direct Care services are provided under the supervision of a Licensed Healthcare Professional 
**(Identify the specific report and line item) 
***FFS reimbursable for individuals approved for MH 1915(i) Home and Community Based State Plan Option, Dis‐
cussion currently underway to amend the State Medicaid Plan, Rehabilitative Services Option which will authorize 
FFS OHP for this HCPCS code. 
Oregon Health Authority 
Medical Assistance Programs 
 
Non­Traditional Health Workers Financing Options 
9/2/2015 16
© 2014 Community Resources LLCUpdated 10/1/14
9/2/2015 17
States are pursuing various models in
CHW policy innovation
 Legislative: Texas, Ohio, Massachusetts, New Mexico,
Illinois, Maryland
 Medicaid rules: Minnesota, Wisconsin, DC
 Policy driven by specific health reform initiatives:
New York, Oregon, South Carolina + SIM states
 Broad-based coalition process: Arizona, Florida.
Michigan
9/2/2015 18
Federal agencies are increasing support
for CHW strategies
 CDC priority on support for policy and systems change
 CDC and HRSA support for TA at state request
 HHS CHW Interagency Work Group
 Office of Women’s Health:
Women’s Health Leadership Institute
 CMMI Grantee CHW Learning Collaborative
 National Health Care Workforce Commission
9/2/2015 19
What CHWs do –
and the skills required
9/2/2015 20
CHWs perform a
wide range of Core Roles
 Cultural mediation between communities and health
and human services system
 Providing culturally appropriate health education
and information
 Assuring people get the services they need
Source: National Community Health Advisor Study, Univ. of Arizona, 1998
219/2/2015
CHWs perform a
wide range of Core Roles cont’d
 Informal counseling and social support
 Advocating for individual and community needs
 Providing [some] direct services and meeting
basic needs
 Building individual and community capacity
Source: National Community Health Advisor Study, Univ. of Arizona, 1998
9/2/2015 22
CHWs are employed in many different models
of care
 Member of primary care team
 Patient navigator
 Provider: services, screening, education
 Outreach/enroll/inform concerning specific programs or
services
 Organizer/advocate
Source: HRSA CHW National Workforce Study, 2007
23
9/2/2015
CHWs maintain a unique balance of accountability between
community and health care system
 Roots of CHWs in social justice and economic opportunity
 Many are still grassroots volunteers, especially Promotores
 Increasing interest from health care employers
 CHWs must preserve integrity of community relationships
 As part of personal values
 As an essential factor in their effectiveness!
 Constant balancing act: relationship vs. task
 Compromise: providers/payers can contract with community-based
organizations
9/2/2015 24
CHWs are increasingly employed in innovative
settings combining clinical care and population
health
 Hybrid (Community HUB, Accountable Care
Community, Health Neighborhood)
 Outsourcing to CBOs
 Social entrepreneurial (Canadian co-op)
 South Carolina CHW initiative
9/2/2015 25
The State of the Evidence
9/2/2015 26
Evidence base on CHWs is
growing but complicated
 Hard to present simple answers,
but impact is evident on health outcomes, health
knowledge/behaviors, and costs
 Diversity of CHW activities and health issues means
no unitary measure
 Increasing evidence of cost-effectiveness or “return
on investment” from cost savings
9/2/2015 27
Evidence of CHW impact on
health outcomes is clear in many areas
 Birth outcomes: clearest evidence of preventive impact
 Diabetes: A1c, BMI, HTN, health behaviors
 Asthma: symptom control, missed days
 Cancer screening rates > early detection
 Immunization rates
 Hospital readmissions (care transitions)
9/2/2015 28
Financial ROI can be dramatic
Recent studies all showing about 3:1 net return or better:
 Molina Health Care: Medicaid HMO reducing cost of
high utilizers
 Arkansas “Community Connectors” keeping elderly and
disabled out of long-term care facilities
 Community Health Access Program (Ohio) “Pathways”
reducing low birth weight and premature deliveries
 Texas hospitals: redirecting uninsured from Emergency
Depts. to primary care
 Langdale Industries: self-insured industrial company working
with employees who cost benefits program the most
9/2/2015 29
Citations for ROI
 Johnson D, Saavedra, P, Sun E, et al. Community health workers and
Medicaid managed care in New Mexico. J Community Health; 2011; DOI
10.1007/s10900-011-0484-1
 Felix HC, Mays GP, Stewart MK, et al. The care span: Medicaid savings
resulted when community health workers matched those with needs to
home and community care. Health Affairs. 2011;30(7):1366-74.
 Redding S, Conrey E, Porter K, Paulson J, Hughes K, Redding M.
Pathways Community Care Coordination in Low Birth Weight Prevention.
Matern Child Health J; Aug 2014; DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1554-4
 Dols J. Return on investment from CHRISTUS Health CHW program.
PowerPoint presentation, Houston TX, 2010.
 Miller A. Georgia firm’s blueprint for taming health costs. Georgia Health
News; July 27, 2011.
9/2/2015 30
Key policy areas for consideration in
states that want to advance the CHW
workforce
9/2/2015 31
4 key policy areas require attention
1. Occupational definition (agreement on scope of
practice and skill requirements)
2. Sustainable financing models
3. Documentation, research and data standards
(records, evidence of effectiveness and “ROI”)
4. Workforce development (training
capacity/resources)
329/2/2015
4 key policy areas require attention
1. Occupational definition
 Need agreement on CHW Scope of Practice (SOP)
and skill requirements
 Linked to awareness/education effort
 Broad consensus needed
339/2/2015
CHW Scope of Practice
gradually gaining traction
 SoP formally adopted only in MA, MN
 States with certification (TX, OH) currently have
broader definitions
 States relying on the 1998 National Community
Health Advisor Study “Core Roles” as starting point
 Derived from national surveys and focus groups of CHWs
and employers
9/2/2015 34
4 key policy areas require attention
Cont’d
2. Sustainable financing models
 Support CHWs as permanent, integrated workforce,
rather than on short-term
 Encourage internal financing by employers as well as
3rd-party payment
 High potential in new models of care (PCMH, ACO)
9/2/2015 35
9/2/2015 36
4 key policy areas require attention
Cont’d
3. Documentation, research and data standards
Records, evidence of effectiveness, and ROI
9/2/2015 37
4 key policy areas require attention
Cont’d
4. Workforce development
 Training:
 Must be competency-based, learner-centered, participatory
 Emphasize field work, mentoring, and include on-going practice-based
assessment
 Should be offered in various settings: familiar, accessible
 Who pays?
 How much classroom pre / post-hire?
 Employers must consider career development
9/2/2015 38
Key Strategy Points in Policy Change
 Education and awareness effort needed first
 Need “Champions” in various stakeholder groups
 Interdisciplinary collaboration & self-determination
 Recognize history of CHW leadership & advocacy for
profession
 Take action with CHWs, not for them
 New APHA policy statement under consideration
 CHW networks and associations may need support
399/2/2015
Key Strategy Points in Policy Change
cont’d
 Is legislation needed? At what point?
 Learn from other states’ experience with
legislation:
MN, MA, NM, IL, MD & others in progress
 Using local and national workforce data
 Remember: Not all CHWs work in health care!
9/2/2015 40
Thank you!
 Ashley Wennerstrom, PhD, MPH
awenners@tulane.edu
 Carl H. Rush, MRP
carl.h.rush@uth.tmc.edu
 Samantha Sabo, DrPH, MPH
sabo@email.arizona.edu
9/2/2015 41

Milbank presentationfinal cr 11 10-14

  • 1.
    Community Health Workers: the Stateof the Evidence Ashley Wennerstrom, PhD, MPH, Tulane Schoos of Medicine - New Orleans Carl H. Rush, MRP, University of Texas School of Public Health - Atlanta Samantha Sabo, DrPH, MPH, University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health - Scottsdale 9/2/2015 1
  • 2.
    Topics  Definitions  WhyCHWs now?  What CHWs do – and the skills required  State of the Evidence  Activity at the federal and state levels  Key challenges in CHW policy and workforce sustainability 9/2/2015 2
  • 3.
    What’s your definitionof CHW? 39/2/2015
  • 4.
    Community Health WorkerDefinition American Public Health Association  The CHW is a frontline public health worker who is a trusted member of and/or has an unusually close understanding of the community served.  This trusting relationship enables the CHW to serve as a liaison/link/intermediary between health/social services and the community to facilitate access to services and improve the quality and cultural competence of service delivery. (cont’d) 49/2/2015
  • 5.
    Community Health WorkerDefinition American Public Health Association  The CHW also builds individual and community capacity by increasing health knowledge and self-sufficiency through a range of activities such as:  outreach  community education  informal counseling, social support and  advocacy. APHA CHW Section, 2006 9/2/2015 5
  • 6.
    CHWs are unlikeother health-related professions  Do not provide clinical care  Generally do not hold another professional license  Expertise is based on shared life experience and (usually) culture with the population served (cont’d) 69/2/2015
  • 7.
    CHWs are unlikeother health-related professions  Rely on relationships and trust more than on clinical expertise  Relate to community members as peers rather than purely as client  Can achieve certain results more effectively than other professionals 79/2/2015
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Why are wediscussing CHWs?  Growing diversity of U.S. population  Growing prevalence of chronic diseases  Growing complexity of health care  Cost pressures on health care system  Shortages of clinical personnel  Commitment to reducing health inequities  Recognition of social/behavioral determinants of health  Growing experience/evidence base with CHWs 9/2/2015 9
  • 10.
    Why are wediscussing CHWs?  The “Triple Aim”  Improving the patient experience of care (including quality and satisfaction);  Improving the health of populations; and  Reducing the per capita cost of health care  Health care reform: changing accountability for outcomes: CHW as members of health care teams  Accountable care organizations (ACOs)  Patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs)  Incentives to reduce costs, improve care 9/2/2015 10
  • 11.
    CHWs can bethe integrators! Health Care Individual Level Disease Research & Intervention Public Health SDOH research & intervention IOM. 2013. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, poorer health. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. Social determinants have not been integrated in clinic practice or health care systems Leads to lower value, substandard care 9/2/2015 11
  • 12.
    What’s happening inthe States - and at the federal level? 9/2/2015 12
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    9/2/2015 15 Worker  Direct Care*  Care Coordination/ Health Promotion   Population­Based  Prevention/ Outreach/  Health Promotion   Payment Options  Reporting   CHW  PWS  NAV  X  X  X    PCPCH Payment  or  CCO‐ICM Capitation   Documentation in   Medical Record   CHW  PWS  NAV    X  X  X  CCO‐ICM Capitation  Or  CCO Sub‐Contracted Entity   CCO Reports   Expenditures on   Financial Report **   Doula  X    Payment to Provider, Hospital  or Birthing Center is enhanced  when Doula is utilized   FFS Claim for Delivery is billed  with modifier    CCO reimbursement is depend‐ ent on the business practice of  the plan   CHW‐Community Health Worker; PWS‐Peer Wellness Specialist; NAV‐Personal Health Navigator  *Direct Care services are provided under the supervision of a Licensed Healthcare Professional  **(Identify the specific report and line item)  ***FFS reimbursable for individuals approved for MH 1915(i) Home and Community Based State Plan Option, Dis‐ cussion currently underway to amend the State Medicaid Plan, Rehabilitative Services Option which will authorize  FFS OHP for this HCPCS code.  Oregon Health Authority  Medical Assistance Programs    Non­Traditional Health Workers Financing Options 
  • 16.
  • 17.
    © 2014 CommunityResources LLCUpdated 10/1/14 9/2/2015 17
  • 18.
    States are pursuingvarious models in CHW policy innovation  Legislative: Texas, Ohio, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Illinois, Maryland  Medicaid rules: Minnesota, Wisconsin, DC  Policy driven by specific health reform initiatives: New York, Oregon, South Carolina + SIM states  Broad-based coalition process: Arizona, Florida. Michigan 9/2/2015 18
  • 19.
    Federal agencies areincreasing support for CHW strategies  CDC priority on support for policy and systems change  CDC and HRSA support for TA at state request  HHS CHW Interagency Work Group  Office of Women’s Health: Women’s Health Leadership Institute  CMMI Grantee CHW Learning Collaborative  National Health Care Workforce Commission 9/2/2015 19
  • 20.
    What CHWs do– and the skills required 9/2/2015 20
  • 21.
    CHWs perform a widerange of Core Roles  Cultural mediation between communities and health and human services system  Providing culturally appropriate health education and information  Assuring people get the services they need Source: National Community Health Advisor Study, Univ. of Arizona, 1998 219/2/2015
  • 22.
    CHWs perform a widerange of Core Roles cont’d  Informal counseling and social support  Advocating for individual and community needs  Providing [some] direct services and meeting basic needs  Building individual and community capacity Source: National Community Health Advisor Study, Univ. of Arizona, 1998 9/2/2015 22
  • 23.
    CHWs are employedin many different models of care  Member of primary care team  Patient navigator  Provider: services, screening, education  Outreach/enroll/inform concerning specific programs or services  Organizer/advocate Source: HRSA CHW National Workforce Study, 2007 23 9/2/2015
  • 24.
    CHWs maintain aunique balance of accountability between community and health care system  Roots of CHWs in social justice and economic opportunity  Many are still grassroots volunteers, especially Promotores  Increasing interest from health care employers  CHWs must preserve integrity of community relationships  As part of personal values  As an essential factor in their effectiveness!  Constant balancing act: relationship vs. task  Compromise: providers/payers can contract with community-based organizations 9/2/2015 24
  • 25.
    CHWs are increasinglyemployed in innovative settings combining clinical care and population health  Hybrid (Community HUB, Accountable Care Community, Health Neighborhood)  Outsourcing to CBOs  Social entrepreneurial (Canadian co-op)  South Carolina CHW initiative 9/2/2015 25
  • 26.
    The State ofthe Evidence 9/2/2015 26
  • 27.
    Evidence base onCHWs is growing but complicated  Hard to present simple answers, but impact is evident on health outcomes, health knowledge/behaviors, and costs  Diversity of CHW activities and health issues means no unitary measure  Increasing evidence of cost-effectiveness or “return on investment” from cost savings 9/2/2015 27
  • 28.
    Evidence of CHWimpact on health outcomes is clear in many areas  Birth outcomes: clearest evidence of preventive impact  Diabetes: A1c, BMI, HTN, health behaviors  Asthma: symptom control, missed days  Cancer screening rates > early detection  Immunization rates  Hospital readmissions (care transitions) 9/2/2015 28
  • 29.
    Financial ROI canbe dramatic Recent studies all showing about 3:1 net return or better:  Molina Health Care: Medicaid HMO reducing cost of high utilizers  Arkansas “Community Connectors” keeping elderly and disabled out of long-term care facilities  Community Health Access Program (Ohio) “Pathways” reducing low birth weight and premature deliveries  Texas hospitals: redirecting uninsured from Emergency Depts. to primary care  Langdale Industries: self-insured industrial company working with employees who cost benefits program the most 9/2/2015 29
  • 30.
    Citations for ROI Johnson D, Saavedra, P, Sun E, et al. Community health workers and Medicaid managed care in New Mexico. J Community Health; 2011; DOI 10.1007/s10900-011-0484-1  Felix HC, Mays GP, Stewart MK, et al. The care span: Medicaid savings resulted when community health workers matched those with needs to home and community care. Health Affairs. 2011;30(7):1366-74.  Redding S, Conrey E, Porter K, Paulson J, Hughes K, Redding M. Pathways Community Care Coordination in Low Birth Weight Prevention. Matern Child Health J; Aug 2014; DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1554-4  Dols J. Return on investment from CHRISTUS Health CHW program. PowerPoint presentation, Houston TX, 2010.  Miller A. Georgia firm’s blueprint for taming health costs. Georgia Health News; July 27, 2011. 9/2/2015 30
  • 31.
    Key policy areasfor consideration in states that want to advance the CHW workforce 9/2/2015 31
  • 32.
    4 key policyareas require attention 1. Occupational definition (agreement on scope of practice and skill requirements) 2. Sustainable financing models 3. Documentation, research and data standards (records, evidence of effectiveness and “ROI”) 4. Workforce development (training capacity/resources) 329/2/2015
  • 33.
    4 key policyareas require attention 1. Occupational definition  Need agreement on CHW Scope of Practice (SOP) and skill requirements  Linked to awareness/education effort  Broad consensus needed 339/2/2015
  • 34.
    CHW Scope ofPractice gradually gaining traction  SoP formally adopted only in MA, MN  States with certification (TX, OH) currently have broader definitions  States relying on the 1998 National Community Health Advisor Study “Core Roles” as starting point  Derived from national surveys and focus groups of CHWs and employers 9/2/2015 34
  • 35.
    4 key policyareas require attention Cont’d 2. Sustainable financing models  Support CHWs as permanent, integrated workforce, rather than on short-term  Encourage internal financing by employers as well as 3rd-party payment  High potential in new models of care (PCMH, ACO) 9/2/2015 35
  • 36.
  • 37.
    4 key policyareas require attention Cont’d 3. Documentation, research and data standards Records, evidence of effectiveness, and ROI 9/2/2015 37
  • 38.
    4 key policyareas require attention Cont’d 4. Workforce development  Training:  Must be competency-based, learner-centered, participatory  Emphasize field work, mentoring, and include on-going practice-based assessment  Should be offered in various settings: familiar, accessible  Who pays?  How much classroom pre / post-hire?  Employers must consider career development 9/2/2015 38
  • 39.
    Key Strategy Pointsin Policy Change  Education and awareness effort needed first  Need “Champions” in various stakeholder groups  Interdisciplinary collaboration & self-determination  Recognize history of CHW leadership & advocacy for profession  Take action with CHWs, not for them  New APHA policy statement under consideration  CHW networks and associations may need support 399/2/2015
  • 40.
    Key Strategy Pointsin Policy Change cont’d  Is legislation needed? At what point?  Learn from other states’ experience with legislation: MN, MA, NM, IL, MD & others in progress  Using local and national workforce data  Remember: Not all CHWs work in health care! 9/2/2015 40
  • 41.
    Thank you!  AshleyWennerstrom, PhD, MPH awenners@tulane.edu  Carl H. Rush, MRP carl.h.rush@uth.tmc.edu  Samantha Sabo, DrPH, MPH sabo@email.arizona.edu 9/2/2015 41

Editor's Notes

  • #7 We have noted earlier that the occupation of CHW is different from conventional occupations, even within health care and public health. The first distinction is that they generally do not provide clinical care, beyond some simple screening tasks such as blood pressure and demonstrating medical devices like a glucometer. There are a few exceptions, mainly in remote rural areas, such as the tribal Community Health Representatives and the Community Health Aide/Practitioners in Alaska. The next three points, however, begin to get at the essence of the occupation. CHWs are effective because of their ability to create trusting relationships with community members. This is more important than their clinical knowledge; their clinical education is generally limited to essential knowledge in topics related to their specific job. They are typically not allowed to give any form of medical advice, and often refer patients to a clinical supervisor in dealing with detailed clinical questions. They do, however, have what might be termed “experience-based expertise,” and are helpful to the system as well as to the community by using their understanding of the culture and social structure of the community they serve. This understanding is generally based on actually sharing cultural background and similar life experience with that community rather than on sociological theory or advanced social work methods. Another distinction, and a strength of the CHW, is their ability to relate to community members as peers rather than purely as patients or clients. The conventional professional-to-client relationship can set up barriers to communication based on differences of power, status and culture; the CHW can avoid those distinctions, leading in many cases to greater trust, candor and cooperation on the part of the patient. And finally, most CHWs do not hold a license in another profession. There are some cases of licensed nurses, social workers and other professionals who choose to practice as CHWs for reasons of personal preference or commitment. Some foreign-trained medical professionals also work as CHWs, but the vast majority of CHWs are otherwise unlicensed, hence the common use of the term “lay workers” to describe them.
  • #11  As I mentioned, national policies that promote equity and accountability can dramatically improve health outcomes. Recent national policies like the Triple Aims Initiative and the components of the Affordable Care Act create opportunities for our health care system to be more accountable and responsive to the larger health and social needs of our communities. As you all know, the US health care system is the most costly in the world, accounting for 17% of the gross domestic product with estimates that percentage will grow to nearly 20% by 2020. The triple Aim requires accountability for improving the patient experience of care , including quality and satisfaction; Improving the health of populations; and reducing the per capita cost of health care. While the ACA offers evidenced based systems strategies such as accountable care organizations and patient centered medical home
  • #12 ****STEP 7: Share Experience with clinics, Public Health dept & partners
  • #24 This also might be described as the range of ROLES CHWs play Actual Role is often a combination Patient Navigator is a hot topic – CMS, NCI, Pfizer