SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Minutes

TO:          Copyright Issues Group
FROM:        Paula Stanley
DATE:        July 9, 1996
SUBJECT: Copyright Committee, Greenhill College
         Minutes of Regular Meeting, July 9, 1996


Members Present: Ms. Appelbaum, Dr. Blackburn, Dean Chan, Professor Garcia,
ProfessorGreenberg, Professor Kozowski, Mr. Smith, Professor Snow, Ms. Stanley, Dr.
Washington

Members Absent: Professor Keynes

Guest: Professor Arnold Alexander, Chair of the Faculty Senate

Dr. Blackburn called the meeting to order in the Library Conference Room at 1:15 p.m.

The minutes of the 14 June 1996 meeting were approved unanimously without comment
oramendment.

Professor Greenberg and Ms. Stanley summarized the report of the legal review
subcommittee(included with the meeting agenda) that Greenhill College owns any
intellectual property developedby a faculty member in his or her major field except for
textbooks, which are specifically excludedin the College's Policies and Procedures. The
subcommittee report recommended thatGreenhill College should also waive ownership
interest in 1) artistic works that are not accomplishedunder a program of research and do not
use Greenhill College facilities, and 2) intellectual propertydeveloped pursuant to a
preexisting consulting agreement where there are no sponsored researchobligations and there
is little or no use of Greenhill College facilities.

Professor Snow moved to accept and endorse the subcommittee's report. With no discussion,
themotion was passed with seven members voting yes, two members voting no, and one
memberabstaining.

The Committee then reviewed the "close-to-final" draft of the new Intellectual Policy
Guidelines. Dean Chan moved to amend the Guidelines to add a statement that Greenhill
College will retaina "shop right" in all intellectual property developed at Greenhill College,
including journal articlesand textbooks.

Dr. Washington expressed concern that such shop rights might encourage circulation of
piratedcopies of copyrighted works. There was then considerable discussion on possible
protections thatmight be placed on journal articles and textbooks to ensure that copies made
pursuant to GreenhillCollege's retained shop right do not proliferate outside Greenhill
College.
Ms. Stanley suggested including notices or markers on both the electronic and printed forms
of thearticles and placing electronically distributed copies on a protected server. Dean Chan
suggestedthat the acknowledgment that Greenhill College has a responsibility to make such
efforts atprotecting the material should be placed in a statement accompanying the Greenhill
Collegereservation of shop rights.

With such protection built in, the Committee agreed that Greenhill College's shop rights
shouldapply to the published version of a work. Julio Garcia felt that publishers might want
to negotiatethis. He volunteered to revise the motion to reflect the Committee's discussion
and then to send itto the Copyright Committee of the AAP for their comments.

Professor Alexander felt that the "shop right" wouldn't be much of a problem for faculty but
thechange in the ownership policy might be, especially if it were perceived as a "give-back"
by thefaculty. He suggested we poll other colleges and universities to find out what their
policies are. Alexander also suggested that the Faculty Policy Committee should also review
the revised "shopright" provision before the Committee votes on the final guidelines at its
next meeting on 5 August1996.

The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.

Next Meeting: August 5, 1996

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (9)

Sample minutes of meeting
Sample minutes of meetingSample minutes of meeting
Sample minutes of meeting
 
2014f1n3
2014f1n32014f1n3
2014f1n3
 
Cal 1
Cal 1Cal 1
Cal 1
 
Ciências política
Ciências políticaCiências política
Ciências política
 
Acc
AccAcc
Acc
 
DCresume (1)
DCresume (1)DCresume (1)
DCresume (1)
 
Pacman
PacmanPacman
Pacman
 
Portugal 2004 2012
Portugal 2004 2012Portugal 2004 2012
Portugal 2004 2012
 
SmartSolutionsSmallBusiness_NEW (1)
SmartSolutionsSmallBusiness_NEW (1)SmartSolutionsSmallBusiness_NEW (1)
SmartSolutionsSmallBusiness_NEW (1)
 

More from IIIM

Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07
Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07
Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07IIIM
 
Revltr4estof c mvalue
Revltr4estof c mvalueRevltr4estof c mvalue
Revltr4estof c mvalueIIIM
 
Resource002042 rep3035
Resource002042 rep3035Resource002042 rep3035
Resource002042 rep3035IIIM
 
Researchproposalexample
ResearchproposalexampleResearchproposalexample
ResearchproposalexampleIIIM
 
Minutes participants
Minutes participantsMinutes participants
Minutes participantsIIIM
 
Agenda format
Agenda formatAgenda format
Agenda formatIIIM
 
Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0IIIM
 
Human resource management
Human resource managementHuman resource management
Human resource managementIIIM
 
career planning
career planningcareer planning
career planningIIIM
 
Chapter12
Chapter12Chapter12
Chapter12IIIM
 
22054173 career-planning-ppt
22054173 career-planning-ppt22054173 career-planning-ppt
22054173 career-planning-pptIIIM
 
Critical
CriticalCritical
CriticalIIIM
 

More from IIIM (12)

Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07
Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07
Tosca tc minutes 2012 06-07
 
Revltr4estof c mvalue
Revltr4estof c mvalueRevltr4estof c mvalue
Revltr4estof c mvalue
 
Resource002042 rep3035
Resource002042 rep3035Resource002042 rep3035
Resource002042 rep3035
 
Researchproposalexample
ResearchproposalexampleResearchproposalexample
Researchproposalexample
 
Minutes participants
Minutes participantsMinutes participants
Minutes participants
 
Agenda format
Agenda formatAgenda format
Agenda format
 
Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0
 
Human resource management
Human resource managementHuman resource management
Human resource management
 
career planning
career planningcareer planning
career planning
 
Chapter12
Chapter12Chapter12
Chapter12
 
22054173 career-planning-ppt
22054173 career-planning-ppt22054173 career-planning-ppt
22054173 career-planning-ppt
 
Critical
CriticalCritical
Critical
 

Memorandum

  • 1. Minutes TO: Copyright Issues Group FROM: Paula Stanley DATE: July 9, 1996 SUBJECT: Copyright Committee, Greenhill College Minutes of Regular Meeting, July 9, 1996 Members Present: Ms. Appelbaum, Dr. Blackburn, Dean Chan, Professor Garcia, ProfessorGreenberg, Professor Kozowski, Mr. Smith, Professor Snow, Ms. Stanley, Dr. Washington Members Absent: Professor Keynes Guest: Professor Arnold Alexander, Chair of the Faculty Senate Dr. Blackburn called the meeting to order in the Library Conference Room at 1:15 p.m. The minutes of the 14 June 1996 meeting were approved unanimously without comment oramendment. Professor Greenberg and Ms. Stanley summarized the report of the legal review subcommittee(included with the meeting agenda) that Greenhill College owns any intellectual property developedby a faculty member in his or her major field except for textbooks, which are specifically excludedin the College's Policies and Procedures. The subcommittee report recommended thatGreenhill College should also waive ownership interest in 1) artistic works that are not accomplishedunder a program of research and do not use Greenhill College facilities, and 2) intellectual propertydeveloped pursuant to a preexisting consulting agreement where there are no sponsored researchobligations and there is little or no use of Greenhill College facilities. Professor Snow moved to accept and endorse the subcommittee's report. With no discussion, themotion was passed with seven members voting yes, two members voting no, and one memberabstaining. The Committee then reviewed the "close-to-final" draft of the new Intellectual Policy Guidelines. Dean Chan moved to amend the Guidelines to add a statement that Greenhill College will retaina "shop right" in all intellectual property developed at Greenhill College, including journal articlesand textbooks. Dr. Washington expressed concern that such shop rights might encourage circulation of piratedcopies of copyrighted works. There was then considerable discussion on possible protections thatmight be placed on journal articles and textbooks to ensure that copies made pursuant to GreenhillCollege's retained shop right do not proliferate outside Greenhill College.
  • 2. Ms. Stanley suggested including notices or markers on both the electronic and printed forms of thearticles and placing electronically distributed copies on a protected server. Dean Chan suggestedthat the acknowledgment that Greenhill College has a responsibility to make such efforts atprotecting the material should be placed in a statement accompanying the Greenhill Collegereservation of shop rights. With such protection built in, the Committee agreed that Greenhill College's shop rights shouldapply to the published version of a work. Julio Garcia felt that publishers might want to negotiatethis. He volunteered to revise the motion to reflect the Committee's discussion and then to send itto the Copyright Committee of the AAP for their comments. Professor Alexander felt that the "shop right" wouldn't be much of a problem for faculty but thechange in the ownership policy might be, especially if it were perceived as a "give-back" by thefaculty. He suggested we poll other colleges and universities to find out what their policies are. Alexander also suggested that the Faculty Policy Committee should also review the revised "shopright" provision before the Committee votes on the final guidelines at its next meeting on 5 August1996. The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Next Meeting: August 5, 1996