Histories	of	the	Future	in	
Contemporary	Megastructures	
	
Stephen	Graham
1.	“Let	us	raise	
	the	level	of	the	city!”		
	
“The	houses	of	concrete,	glass	and	iron	must	
rise	on	the	edge	of	a	tumultuous	abyss”.	
	Instead	of	ground-level	streets	stretching	
“like	a	foot-mat	level	with	the	porter’s	
lodge,”		future	ciEes	would	instead	“be	linked	
by	metal	walkways	and	immensely	fast	
escalators.”		
“Let	us	throw	away	sidewalks,	arcades,	
steps!”	he	extolled.	“Let	us	raise	the	level	of	
the	city!”		
Antonio	Sant	Elia
Newcastle:		
The	‘Layer-cake	City’	
“prepare	a	fresh	layout	in	
three	dimensions,	and	then	
to	redevelop	the	areas	as	a	
whole	in	one	conEnuous	
operaEon”
“no	project	for	urban	renewal,	
be	it	extensive	or	quite	local,	
will	match	up	to	modern	
necessiEes	unless	it	provides	
for	proper	segregaEon	of	
operaEons.		This	is	essenEal	
for	safety,	for	maximum	
concentraEon	of	use,	and	for	
amenity	and	comfort		[…]	The	
transport	design	should,	
therefore,	aim	at	the	
segregaEon	of	pedestrians,	
city	roads,	service	roads,	and	
car	park	roads,	leading	to	
mulE-level	circulaEon	of	
funcEons	such	as	two-storey	
shopping”		
InsEtuEon	of	Municipal	Engineers,	1962
“Some	of	the	most	hated	
and	unmanageable	
[planned	landscapes]		in	
urban	Britain.		Dismantling	
or	dis-	guising	the	legacy	
of	deck	access	and	
walkway	design	now	
absorbs	a	good	share	of	
the	BriEsh	government’s	
“problem	estates”	budget.			
	
Several	recently	built	
mega-	structures	are	
being	demolished	and	the	
original	paXern	of	streets	
and	sidewalks	reinstated”	
	
Michael	Hebbert
2.	Internalising		
Downtown	
“The	development	of	discrete,	grade-separated	pedestrian	
networks	in	the	downtown	core	areas	is	surely	one	of	the	most	
remarkable,	[]	The	idea	of	an	interior	city	from	which	one	might	
never	need	to	step	outdoors,	is	on	the	point	of	realizaEon	in	a	
score	of	locaEons	across	the	conEnent”.	
Barry	Maitland,	1992
Li[ing	the	Ladder	Up?	
In	1980s	urban	crisis,	Minneapolis’	eight-mile	
skyway	system	“became	something	it	was	
never	intended	to	be:	a	fortress,	a	filter,	a	
refuge”	Trevor	Boddy.		
	
“The	success	and	proliferaEon	of	interiorized	
acEvity	and	the	fact	that	its	nodes	can	be	
placed	anywhere		as	islands	whose	
connecEve	Essue	is	a	sea	of	formlessness	
and	nothingness,	has	le[	the	outside	
amputated,	mostly	inhabitable,	and	quite	
o[en	a	space	of	threat”		
Sze	Tsung	Leong			
	
“The	beginnings	of	a	dual	level	downtown	
society	in	which	people	are	physically	
separated	by	class”		
Kent	Robertson
“The	enEre	Hill	is	[...]	separated	
from	the	adjacent	city	by	an	
obstacle	course	of	open	freeway	
trenches,	a	palisade	of	concrete	
parking	garages	and	and	a	tangle	
of	concrete	bridges	linking	
citadel	to	citadel	high	above	the	
streets.	[…]		We	could	aXain	the	
summit	from	the	south,	but	only	
by	climbing	a	narrow,	heavily	
patrolled	stair	‘plaza’,	studded	
with	video	cameras	and	clearly	
marked	as	private	property”			
	
Steven	Flusty
3.	Bangkok’s	Skytrain:	
An	“Exclusive,	Elevated		
Urban	Realm”:		
	
	
•  A	“supreme	symbol	and	icon	of	Bangkok’s	
entrance	into	the	realm	of	the	super-
modern”	;	Raised	travellers	experience	the	
city	“within	an	elevated	urban	realm	of	cool	
spaces,	whilst	being	voyeur	of	the	relaEvely	
chaoEc	‘other’	realm	below”		Richardson	and	
Jensen	
•  Tickets	cost	over	10%	of	average	monthly	
wages	in	Thailand		
•  Elites	and	wealthy	groups	are	starEng	to	live,	
work	and	entertain	themselves	within	a	
raised	archipelago	city	of	enclaves,	which	
develop	new	concentraEons	of	elite	services	
and	spaces	geared	to	their	needs,	laced	
together	along	the	raised	urban	plane		by	the	
Skytrain	and	its	system	of	skybridges	
providing	‘plug-in’	connecEons	to	its	staEon
“The	upper	middle	classes	and	the	rich	people	transport	themselves	and	live,	
generally	speaking,	from	3rd	floor	and	up.	They	work	in	buildings	with	air	
condiEoning;	they	shop	in	air	condiEoned	shopping	malls;	go	to	cinemas	and	
train	in	cool	fitness	centres.	They	even	transport	themselves	in	air	condiEoned	
cars	on	elevated	high	ways	or	in	sky	trains.”	Marling
4.	Bypass	in	Bombay	
Geographer	Andrew	Harris	found	
that	at	least	some,	such	as	that	
which	allows	commuters	to	
completely		bypass	the	very	poor	
neighbourhood	of	Bandra	East,		
have	“been	created	to	enable	
parEcular	groups	to	move	through	
the	city	without	having	to	
acknowledge	and	negoEate	the	
widespread	dispossession	and	
poverty	that	remains	the	dominant	
and	abiding	experience	for	most	
people	below”.
5.	Hong	Kong:		
City	Without	Ground	
•  Over	500	
mulElevel	
walkways	that	it	is	
the	first	city	on	
earth	to	have	a	
three-dimensional	
urban	guidebook	
devoted	to	it
“Hong	Kong	enhances	three-dimensional	connecEvity	to	such	a	
degree,”	the	guide’s	authors	write,	“that	it	eliminates	reference	
to	the	ground	altogether.	Hong	Kong	is	a	city	without	ground”	
Solomon,	Wong	and	Frampton,
5.	SpaJal	Dead-Ends:	Beyond	‘VerJcal	Sprawl’?	
	
•  As	ciEes	across	the	world	rise	up,	many	
architects	and	planners	are	arguing	that	a	
fully-three	dimensional	sense	of	the	urban	
public	realm	is	now	necessary.	QuesEons	
of	physical	accessibility	and	social	
inequality	are	now	constructed	within	the	
complex	volumes	of	urban	built	space	and	
can	no	longer	adequately	be	represented	
on	tradiEonal	two-dimensional	maps	used	
by	urban	geographers	and	transport	
planners.		
•  Horizontal	imaginaEons	of	urban	space	
are	clearly	inadequate	to	the	emerging	
urban	labyrinths	which	seamlessly	blend	
over-ground,	ground-level	and	
subterranean	complexes	and	
megastructures	and	link	them	together	
unevenly	through	elevators,	escalators,	
tunnels,	skywalks,	subways,	walkways,	
bridges,	people-movers	and	skytrains
•  With	many	verEcal	enclaves	internalising	a	wide	range	of	services	and	
ameniEes	for	their	elite	owners,	such	projects	are	becoming	more	and	more	
securiEsed	and	solipsisEc;	their	relaEonship	to	the	urban	street	ever-more	
distant	and	remote		
•  ‘VerEcal	gated	communiEes’	
•  “skyscraping	suburb”,	Iris	Hwang		
•  “the	3-D	city	depends	on	sky	passages	that	connect	buildings	together	at	
certain	levels.	In	the	early	twenEeth	century,	each	building	had	its	own	
underground	level;	now	these	are	connected	and	became	part	of	the	city.	
The	same	thing	could	happen	in	the	air”	Hirosi	Hara
•  “Could	some	of	the	retail,	arts	and	leisure	
faciliEes	that	normally	occur	at	ground	level	
within	the	city	be	li[ed	up	into	the	sky	to	
occupy	a	new	‘public	zone’	at	height?”	
Anthony	Wood	
•  MVRDV’s	2005	Mirador;	The	Cloud’	in	
Yongsan;		Pinnacle	at	Duxton,	Singapore
Megastructures Graham

Megastructures Graham