The document appears to be a survey evaluating a recent IT investment planning workshop. It contains questions regarding the quality and usefulness of pre-meeting materials, meeting content, and meeting logistics. Based on the survey results, it seems no attendees completed the survey, as all questions received a score of 0. The only comment provided suggests including more visuals like graphics and charts in future meetings.

1. FY 2010/2011 IT Investment Planning Workshop - June 3, 2008
Attendee Survey
[Insert company name or logo]
Your opinion matters to us. Your feedback helps us improve the quality of the meetings we host.
Instructions: Please review each question and place an "X" in the corresponding response best fitting your opinion.
No Maybe Yes
PRE-MATERIALS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
1. The pre-materials for this meeting were understandable and useful.
2. The pre-materials were sent in advance of the meeting date.
3. The pre-materials provided sufficient information.
No Maybe Yes
MEETING CONTENT 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
4. The content of the meeting was informative and useful for me.
5. The meeting offered me the opportunity to ask questions.
6. The meeting was conducted in a way that respected my busy schedule.
No Maybe Yes
MEETING LOGISTICS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
7. The length of the meeting was sufficient.
8. The room was comfortable and conducive for the meeting.
9. The location was convenient.
How could the meeting have been more useful to you?
Name (optional) Department/Company (optional)
Title (optional) Phone (optional)
E-mail (optional)

2. 6/1/2008 Planning Workshop expand for responses from workshop
Questions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Response
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6
Distribution
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. 9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

4. SURVEY RESULTS FOR APPLICATION MANAGEMENT WORKGROUP MEETING
11-10-05
NO YES Total Weighted Average
1 2 3 4 5 Survey Score Score
PRE-MATERIALS
1 The pre-materials for this meeting were useful and of high quality. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
2 They set my expecations appropriately. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
3 I had sufficient time to read and comment. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
SUBTOTAL PRE-MATERIALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
MEETING CONTENT
4 The content of the meeting was useful for me as an IT executive. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
5 The meeting met its stated goals and objectives. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
6 The meeting offered me the opportunity for open participation and discussion. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
7 The meeting and pre-materials were conducted in a way that respected my busy schedule. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
SUBTOTAL MEETING CONTENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
MEETING LOGISTICS
8 The length of the meeting was just about right. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
9 The room was comfortable and conducive for getting work done. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
SUBTOTAL MEETING LOGISTICS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
TOTAL RANKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
COMMENTS:
1. Make some graphics & charts for respondees to see quick vuail comparison
Meeting Survey Results 06/17/2010