SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Kenneth Horton                                                                                                                                  Main: (801) 832-2600
Associate Professor, Intellectual Property Law & Strategy                                                                                       Cell: (801) 809-0310
MBA Technology Management Program                                                                                                               Direct: (801) 212-2056
Gore School of Business, Westminster College                                                                                                    Khorton@Westminstercollege.edu
1840 South 1300 East                                                                                                                            http://www.linkedin.com/in/HortonIP
Salt Lake City, UT 84105

                                        THE IP STRATEGY MINUTE
                             MAY 2012: OPERATIONS IN YOUR BUSINESS MODEL
In the last two editions of this news letter, I ranked the various business models from level 1 to level 10, with levels 1 to
5 having normal business operations but with an increasing focus on the use of IP assets. Levels 6 to 10 have a
decreasing focus on normal business operations coupled with an increasing focus on IP assets. So how do you move
your company from one level to the next? A better understanding of the differences in their business operations might
help explain such a shift.

                                                                                               1-5
                                                                                                                      SELL PRODUCTS


                                             CREATE                                     6
                                            PRODUCTS                     SELLS IDEAS
                                                                         & INVENTIONS

                                                                                                                                 CAPITAL
                                                                                                     7                            ($$$)
                                                                              IDEAS &
                                                                            INVENTIONS




                                                                                    IDEAS &
                                                                                                     8
                                                                                  INVENTIONS
                                                                                                                                                                            CAPITAL
                                                                                                                                                                             ($$$)


                                 IDEAS &                                                             9
                               INVENTIONS
                  IDEAS &
                INVENTIONS                                         IDEAS &                                           GET                          GET               GET
                                                                 INVENTIONS                                         PATENT             GET       PATENT            PATENT
                                                                                                                                      PATENT
                                                                                               10
                                                                                                          GET
                                                                                                         PATENT




                                     R&D    Brainstorm

                                                                        CAPITAL
                                                                                               11:
                                                                         ($$$)              Leverage
                                                                                             Patent



                                                                                                         LEVERAGE
                             R&D                                                                          PATENT
                                                               CAPITAL
                                                                ($$$)                                                LEVERAGE
                                                                                                                      PATENT
                 R&D

                                                                                                                                LEVERAGE                                          GET
                                                                                                                                 PATENT                                          PATENT
                                                                                                                                           LEVERAGE
                                                                                                                                            PATENT
                                                                 CAPITAL                                                                              OPTIONALLY
                                                                  ($$$)                                                                                LEVERAGE
                                                                                                                                                        PATENT



                                                             CAPITAL
                                                              ($$$)




                                                              CAPITAL
                                                               ($$$)
                                                                                                                                            OPTIONALLY
                                                                                                                                             LEVERAGE
                                                   CAPITAL
                                                    ($$$)
                                                                                                                                              PATENT                                      Leverage=
                                                                                                                                                                                          Litigation +
                                                                                                                                                                                            License




In the diagram, the level of each company is noted in each ring which represents the business components of a company
operating within that level. As we move towards the center of the diagram, the IP assets become more important in the
business. The business contains fewer and fewer non-IP components in the business that can generate revenue for the
company. The business becomes more reliant on the IP assets themselves—rather than other corporate assets—to
bring in revenue for the company.
At level 6 (transitory), the company has partially or completely eliminated the business component of creating and
selling a “physical” product. The business generates revenue from existing IP assets and so has partially turned away
from generating revenue using these physical products. Instead, the company creates ideas and inventions from R&D
and then sells those ideas/inventions instead of—or as well as—the physical products.

At level 7 (technocracy), the company decides also to strategically create new IP assets for the purpose of revenue
generation. Some of the typical business operations that would normally generate revenue from other (non-IP) assets
are then re-assigned to creating new IP assets. There is declining interest in selling ideas/inventions not existing as IP
assets. Instead, the ideas/inventions are used to create IP assets which are then used to generate revenue.

At level 8 (opportunist), the company now generates a majority of its revenue from IP assets. The typical R&D
operations have been completely eliminated or partially eliminated (and replaced) with quasi-R&D (i.e., brainstorming)
sessions that explore “what if” scenarios for various technologies. There is an increased focus on IP asset generation.

At level 9 (privateer), the company has stopped almost all business operations except for those assets used for
generating IP assets. The company no longer evens attempts any R&D that level 8 companies’ arguably employ. The
company can still generate ideas/inventions, but there is no concerted effort to produce them. Rather, they are an off-
shoot of the remainder of the operations.

At level 10 (NPE), the only business operations of the company are the acquisition and monetization of IP assets. There
is no longer any development or creation of IP assets internally within the company. Completely absent is the
generation of ideas/inventions.

I added a new level 11 to this diagram that I have not discussed before. In level 11, the company is leveraging the only
remaining assets of the company: the IP assets. A failed start-up company is a good example of a company operating in
level 11. This level is really not a sustainable business model since the company only leverages existing IP assets. There
is no effort to acquire any additional IP assets as other level 6-10 companies would. And since no additional IP assets
will be acquired, eventually this business model will break down because eventually the existing IP assets will become
obsolete.

More Related Content

Similar to Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter

The first-mile incubator of AREA Science Park
The first-mile incubator of AREA Science ParkThe first-mile incubator of AREA Science Park
The first-mile incubator of AREA Science ParkAREA Science Park
 
Aalto - Tapio Siik
Aalto - Tapio SiikAalto - Tapio Siik
Aalto - Tapio Siik3helix
 
10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs
10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs
10 non textbook lessons for European EntrepreneursMaria Dramalioti-Taylor
 
42629 lecture 11 pt 3
42629 lecture 11 pt 342629 lecture 11 pt 3
42629 lecture 11 pt 3Tom Howard
 
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)BioSingapore2011
 
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged Discoveries
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged DiscoveriesBioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged Discoveries
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged DiscoveriesMaRS Discovery District
 
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant Competition
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant CompetitionPath to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant Competition
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant CompetitionThomas Nastas
 
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)Course Outline for SPSD (updated)
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)Karan Girotra
 
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurs
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for EntrenpreneursMaria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurs
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurssimonphopkins
 
Vce tkk 2010 06-14
Vce tkk 2010 06-14Vce tkk 2010 06-14
Vce tkk 2010 06-14jpkopon2
 
Industrialization Of Innovation
Industrialization Of InnovationIndustrialization Of Innovation
Industrialization Of InnovationAvalon Consulting
 
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for site
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for sitePresentation INNGEO skolkovo short for site
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for siteIgor Samborsky
 

Similar to Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter (18)

The first-mile incubator of AREA Science Park
The first-mile incubator of AREA Science ParkThe first-mile incubator of AREA Science Park
The first-mile incubator of AREA Science Park
 
Aalto - Tapio Siik
Aalto - Tapio SiikAalto - Tapio Siik
Aalto - Tapio Siik
 
10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs
10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs
10 non textbook lessons for European Entrepreneurs
 
FoundersLab
FoundersLabFoundersLab
FoundersLab
 
42629 lecture 11 pt 3
42629 lecture 11 pt 342629 lecture 11 pt 3
42629 lecture 11 pt 3
 
IP & Tech-transfer (7 Dec 2011)
IP & Tech-transfer (7 Dec 2011)IP & Tech-transfer (7 Dec 2011)
IP & Tech-transfer (7 Dec 2011)
 
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)
Bio singapore talk pauline tay ipi_(distribution)
 
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged Discoveries
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged DiscoveriesBioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged Discoveries
BioEntrepreneurship: Exploiting Early Staged Discoveries
 
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant Competition
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant CompetitionPath to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant Competition
Path to Commercialization, Nastas Presentation to Winner of Grant Competition
 
Innovation[1]
Innovation[1]Innovation[1]
Innovation[1]
 
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)Course Outline for SPSD (updated)
Course Outline for SPSD (updated)
 
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurs
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for EntrenpreneursMaria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurs
Maria Dramalioti-Taylor's Rules for Entrenpreneurs
 
Vce tkk 2010 06-14
Vce tkk 2010 06-14Vce tkk 2010 06-14
Vce tkk 2010 06-14
 
Presentation At Ip Conf. 02 12 10
Presentation At Ip Conf. 02 12 10Presentation At Ip Conf. 02 12 10
Presentation At Ip Conf. 02 12 10
 
Industrialization Of Innovation
Industrialization Of InnovationIndustrialization Of Innovation
Industrialization Of Innovation
 
Art Or Science (2)
Art Or Science  (2)Art Or Science  (2)
Art Or Science (2)
 
Expand Marketing
Expand MarketingExpand Marketing
Expand Marketing
 
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for site
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for sitePresentation INNGEO skolkovo short for site
Presentation INNGEO skolkovo short for site
 

More from khorton123

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minutekhorton123
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletterkhorton123
 
December 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 NewsletterDecember 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
December 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 NewsletterDecember 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 

More from khorton123 (20)

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
 
December 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 NewsletterDecember 2011 Newsletter
December 2011 Newsletter
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletter
 
December 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 NewsletterDecember 2010 Newsletter
December 2010 Newsletter
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletter
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletter
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletter
 

Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter

  • 1. Kenneth Horton Main: (801) 832-2600 Associate Professor, Intellectual Property Law & Strategy Cell: (801) 809-0310 MBA Technology Management Program Direct: (801) 212-2056 Gore School of Business, Westminster College Khorton@Westminstercollege.edu 1840 South 1300 East http://www.linkedin.com/in/HortonIP Salt Lake City, UT 84105 THE IP STRATEGY MINUTE MAY 2012: OPERATIONS IN YOUR BUSINESS MODEL In the last two editions of this news letter, I ranked the various business models from level 1 to level 10, with levels 1 to 5 having normal business operations but with an increasing focus on the use of IP assets. Levels 6 to 10 have a decreasing focus on normal business operations coupled with an increasing focus on IP assets. So how do you move your company from one level to the next? A better understanding of the differences in their business operations might help explain such a shift. 1-5 SELL PRODUCTS CREATE 6 PRODUCTS SELLS IDEAS & INVENTIONS CAPITAL 7 ($$$) IDEAS & INVENTIONS IDEAS & 8 INVENTIONS CAPITAL ($$$) IDEAS & 9 INVENTIONS IDEAS & INVENTIONS IDEAS & GET GET GET INVENTIONS PATENT GET PATENT PATENT PATENT 10 GET PATENT R&D Brainstorm CAPITAL 11: ($$$) Leverage Patent LEVERAGE R&D PATENT CAPITAL ($$$) LEVERAGE PATENT R&D LEVERAGE GET PATENT PATENT LEVERAGE PATENT CAPITAL OPTIONALLY ($$$) LEVERAGE PATENT CAPITAL ($$$) CAPITAL ($$$) OPTIONALLY LEVERAGE CAPITAL ($$$) PATENT Leverage= Litigation + License In the diagram, the level of each company is noted in each ring which represents the business components of a company operating within that level. As we move towards the center of the diagram, the IP assets become more important in the business. The business contains fewer and fewer non-IP components in the business that can generate revenue for the company. The business becomes more reliant on the IP assets themselves—rather than other corporate assets—to bring in revenue for the company.
  • 2. At level 6 (transitory), the company has partially or completely eliminated the business component of creating and selling a “physical” product. The business generates revenue from existing IP assets and so has partially turned away from generating revenue using these physical products. Instead, the company creates ideas and inventions from R&D and then sells those ideas/inventions instead of—or as well as—the physical products. At level 7 (technocracy), the company decides also to strategically create new IP assets for the purpose of revenue generation. Some of the typical business operations that would normally generate revenue from other (non-IP) assets are then re-assigned to creating new IP assets. There is declining interest in selling ideas/inventions not existing as IP assets. Instead, the ideas/inventions are used to create IP assets which are then used to generate revenue. At level 8 (opportunist), the company now generates a majority of its revenue from IP assets. The typical R&D operations have been completely eliminated or partially eliminated (and replaced) with quasi-R&D (i.e., brainstorming) sessions that explore “what if” scenarios for various technologies. There is an increased focus on IP asset generation. At level 9 (privateer), the company has stopped almost all business operations except for those assets used for generating IP assets. The company no longer evens attempts any R&D that level 8 companies’ arguably employ. The company can still generate ideas/inventions, but there is no concerted effort to produce them. Rather, they are an off- shoot of the remainder of the operations. At level 10 (NPE), the only business operations of the company are the acquisition and monetization of IP assets. There is no longer any development or creation of IP assets internally within the company. Completely absent is the generation of ideas/inventions. I added a new level 11 to this diagram that I have not discussed before. In level 11, the company is leveraging the only remaining assets of the company: the IP assets. A failed start-up company is a good example of a company operating in level 11. This level is really not a sustainable business model since the company only leverages existing IP assets. There is no effort to acquire any additional IP assets as other level 6-10 companies would. And since no additional IP assets will be acquired, eventually this business model will break down because eventually the existing IP assets will become obsolete.