SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MINUTE
                                         December 2010: Delayed Examination

The PTO recently initiated a pilot program that effectively allows a one-year extension to meet the filing requirements for
a non-provisional application which claims priority of a provisional application.

Summary of the Pilot Program:
1. File a provisional application that is pending for 12 months.
2. File a non-provisional patent application claiming priority of the provisional application, along with a certification and
request (PTO/SB/421) to enter into the pilot program. At the time of filing, you must pay the filing fee but need not pay
the search, examination, or excess claim fees. You can NOT have filed a non-publication request.
3. The PTO will issue an extended Notice to File Missing Parts for the missing fees. The time for replying to the extended
Notice is 12 months.
4. Within 12 months, you must pay the search and examination fees, any excess claim fees, and the $65 surcharge for the
extended Notice of Missing Parts.
5. The application is then officially complete and enters the examination queue.
6. The effective result of the pilot program is that examination of the patent application has been delayed for 24 months
(the 12 month provisional period plus the 12 month extended missing parts period).

Advantages:
1. Reduced initial filing fees since you don’t need to pay the search, examination, or excess claim fees.
2. Additional 12 months before examination begins, thereby delaying prosecution costs and allowing better assessment of
the commercial potential of the invention.

Disadvantages:
1. Increased total cost of PTO fees (you have to eventually pay the $65 surcharge for the extended Notice).
2. Increased fees (attorney fees have to be paid for the additional work related to the request to enter the pilot program and
the time required for docketing, reminders, etc.).
3. Publication, since non-publication of the application is not an option.
4. Loss of patent term since examination is delayed for a year.

Notes:
1. The pilot program does NOT change the requirement that an Applicant must file a non-provisional application, foreign,
or PCT application within 12 months of filing the provisional application.
2. Given that the saved PTO costs are relatively minor compared to the attorney fees that still must expended to draft the
non-provisional application, the pilot program will most likely benefit those who are very cost-sensitive (i.e., individuals
and start-ups).
3. But there will be rare instances where less cost-sensitive applicants (i.e., corporation and in-house counsel) will take
advantage of this pilot program. These instances will happen when the added fees/costs and loss of patent term will be
offset by the additional 12 months that might be needed to determine the commercial potential of the invention.

More Related Content

Similar to December 2010 Newsletter

May 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 NewsletterMay 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition Briefing
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition BriefingISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition Briefing
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition BriefingKTN
 
TM Registration Procedure Overview In Ukraine
TM Registration Procedure Overview In UkraineTM Registration Procedure Overview In Ukraine
TM Registration Procedure Overview In UkraineDmytro Romaniuk
 
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...KTN
 
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...KTN
 
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_articleCraig Buschmann
 
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and Procedures
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and ProceduresUnlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and Procedures
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and ProceduresMuhammed Ameer P
 
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin Cassell
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin CassellOverview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin Cassell
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin CassellWorkman Nydegger
 
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVAL
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVALANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVAL
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVALARPUTHA SELVARAJ A
 
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!Citrin Cooperman
 
May 2011 Newsletter
May 2011 NewsletterMay 2011 Newsletter
May 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creation by 33%
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creationby 33%Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creationby 33%
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creation by 33%GoLeanSixSigma.com
 
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdf
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdfSPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdf
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdfApoorvaR18
 
Fidic contract administration
Fidic contract administrationFidic contract administration
Fidic contract administrationZabeel Institute
 
Sustainable Planning Act 1
Sustainable Planning Act 1Sustainable Planning Act 1
Sustainable Planning Act 1SSSI QLD
 

Similar to December 2010 Newsletter (20)

May 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 NewsletterMay 2010 Newsletter
May 2010 Newsletter
 
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition Briefing
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition BriefingISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition Briefing
ISCF Modernising Energy Data Applications SBRI Competition Briefing
 
Operational Obstacles
Operational ObstaclesOperational Obstacles
Operational Obstacles
 
TM Registration Procedure Overview In Ukraine
TM Registration Procedure Overview In UkraineTM Registration Procedure Overview In Ukraine
TM Registration Procedure Overview In Ukraine
 
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...
Transforming UK construction: Competition process - Julie Brown and Lydia Wei...
 
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...
Transforming Food Production (TFP) - Application guidance briefing - TFP Futu...
 
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article
20141105_energy-law-advisor-nov-2014_track-1_article
 
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and Procedures
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and ProceduresUnlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and Procedures
Unlocking the Power of Patents: A Guide to Types and Procedures
 
(IPR) Patent filing
(IPR) Patent filing(IPR) Patent filing
(IPR) Patent filing
 
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin Cassell
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin CassellOverview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin Cassell
Overview of After Final Practice at the USPTO- Justin Cassell
 
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVAL
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVALANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVAL
ANALYSIS OF PATENTS POST APPROVAL
 
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!
Understanding Single Audit Compliance Requirements - It's No Joke!
 
May 2011 Newsletter
May 2011 NewsletterMay 2011 Newsletter
May 2011 Newsletter
 
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creation by 33%
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creationby 33%Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creationby 33%
Project Storyboard: Reducing Cycle Time for Bid Tab Creation by 33%
 
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...
Developments in Intellectual Property by John Cabeca, Director of USPTO Silic...
 
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdf
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdfSPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdf
SPECS-Guidelines-Presentation.pdf
 
Fidic contract administration
Fidic contract administrationFidic contract administration
Fidic contract administration
 
Trade mark registration processes (2)
Trade mark registration processes (2)Trade mark registration processes (2)
Trade mark registration processes (2)
 
Sustainable Planning Act 1
Sustainable Planning Act 1Sustainable Planning Act 1
Sustainable Planning Act 1
 
2014 12 participant
2014 12 participant2014 12 participant
2014 12 participant
 

More from khorton123

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletterkhorton123
 
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minutekhorton123
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minutekhorton123
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletterkhorton123
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletterkhorton123
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
June 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 NewsletterJune 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 

More from khorton123 (20)

Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ3 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q3 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal MinuteQ2 2014 IP Legal Minute
Q2 2014 IP Legal Minute
 
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q4 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal MinuteOctober 2012 IP Legal Minute
October 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal MinuteAugust 2012 IP Legal Minute
August 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal MinuteJuly 2012 IP Legal Minute
July 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal MinuteJune 2012 IP Legal Minute
June 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q3 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal MinuteMay 2012 IP Legal Minute
May 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal MinuteApril 2012 IP Legal Minute
April 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal MinuteMarch 2012 IP Legal Minute
March 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy NewsletterQ2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
Q2 2012 IP Strategy Newsletter
 
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy MinuteQ1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
Q1 2012 IP Strategy Minute
 
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal MinuteFebruary 2012 IP Legal Minute
February 2012 IP Legal Minute
 
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012  IP Minute NewsletterJanuary 2012  IP Minute Newsletter
January 2012 IP Minute Newsletter
 
November 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 NewsletterNovember 2011 Newsletter
November 2011 Newsletter
 
January 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 NewsletterJanuary 2010 Newsletter
January 2010 Newsletter
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletter
 
April 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 NewsletterApril 2010 Newsletter
April 2010 Newsletter
 
June 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 NewsletterJune 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 Newsletter
 

December 2010 Newsletter

  • 1. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MINUTE December 2010: Delayed Examination The PTO recently initiated a pilot program that effectively allows a one-year extension to meet the filing requirements for a non-provisional application which claims priority of a provisional application. Summary of the Pilot Program: 1. File a provisional application that is pending for 12 months. 2. File a non-provisional patent application claiming priority of the provisional application, along with a certification and request (PTO/SB/421) to enter into the pilot program. At the time of filing, you must pay the filing fee but need not pay the search, examination, or excess claim fees. You can NOT have filed a non-publication request. 3. The PTO will issue an extended Notice to File Missing Parts for the missing fees. The time for replying to the extended Notice is 12 months. 4. Within 12 months, you must pay the search and examination fees, any excess claim fees, and the $65 surcharge for the extended Notice of Missing Parts. 5. The application is then officially complete and enters the examination queue. 6. The effective result of the pilot program is that examination of the patent application has been delayed for 24 months (the 12 month provisional period plus the 12 month extended missing parts period). Advantages: 1. Reduced initial filing fees since you don’t need to pay the search, examination, or excess claim fees. 2. Additional 12 months before examination begins, thereby delaying prosecution costs and allowing better assessment of the commercial potential of the invention. Disadvantages: 1. Increased total cost of PTO fees (you have to eventually pay the $65 surcharge for the extended Notice). 2. Increased fees (attorney fees have to be paid for the additional work related to the request to enter the pilot program and the time required for docketing, reminders, etc.). 3. Publication, since non-publication of the application is not an option. 4. Loss of patent term since examination is delayed for a year. Notes: 1. The pilot program does NOT change the requirement that an Applicant must file a non-provisional application, foreign, or PCT application within 12 months of filing the provisional application. 2. Given that the saved PTO costs are relatively minor compared to the attorney fees that still must expended to draft the non-provisional application, the pilot program will most likely benefit those who are very cost-sensitive (i.e., individuals and start-ups). 3. But there will be rare instances where less cost-sensitive applicants (i.e., corporation and in-house counsel) will take advantage of this pilot program. These instances will happen when the added fees/costs and loss of patent term will be offset by the additional 12 months that might be needed to determine the commercial potential of the invention.