Logical Atomism is completed by the programmable language [A] and makes it possible to map and compute the Universe in terms of its transactions. [Hennessey, 1991]
Startrek applications become very possible without paradoxes
proof of heaven from nasas scientific data - oceanic life independent of oxygen and gravity and not technically in this dimension of timespace ,,,, electrogravity keeps them afloat and non-local and electro-oxidation/respiration keeps them sustained - thanks nasa
a programmable general systems theory and paradox solving paradigm in the philosophy of science. new robotics and teleportation solves halting problem and overcomes quantum/particle wave duality paradox.
this advert for the new TRE paradigm points to articles on slideshare which break new ground e.g completing where Russell and Wittgenstein left off with the idea of logical atomism. also predicts no one basic god particle, but infinite recursion of aether packets with structure at harmonic intervals
proof of heaven from nasas scientific data - oceanic life independent of oxygen and gravity and not technically in this dimension of timespace ,,,, electrogravity keeps them afloat and non-local and electro-oxidation/respiration keeps them sustained - thanks nasa
a programmable general systems theory and paradox solving paradigm in the philosophy of science. new robotics and teleportation solves halting problem and overcomes quantum/particle wave duality paradox.
this advert for the new TRE paradigm points to articles on slideshare which break new ground e.g completing where Russell and Wittgenstein left off with the idea of logical atomism. also predicts no one basic god particle, but infinite recursion of aether packets with structure at harmonic intervals
been saying for a long time that if i have modelled a solution to the halting problem and am disregarded as a thinker - then whats left but endless lawless illogical junk - for example there only is ever one rational exchange model for abc with naturally chaotic inclusion of at least 1 d .- time = 27 states of relative integrity of the exchange... at time 2 that produces 729 (27x27) and only 729 logical states and a closed and limited series of essentialist numbers from [1-729] 1 - infinity ... heh thats a nobel prize winning brand new philosophy of arithmetic yet its the least of my contributions.
729 is a LAW ... enough of this hail eris hail discordia 'a posteriori' IT. this completes what russell and wittgenstein started with their logical atomism - there are 729 logical atoms, with this referencing system - no more halting problem or incomplete goedels numbering. heh just carry on doing what you clever dudes are all doing ... have a happy dark age ...
According to our planets top physicists and cosmologists e.g. Hawking, there is great regularity then a wee bit of chaos.
I really do disagree with the nonsense of that idea - chaos is surely obviously observably Proven to be absolute - and therefore must be intrinsic to time, matter, gravity and space, to us, to our food, to our planet - to other peoples planets and galaxies - and because this is obviously true - certain things follow - ontologically from this - such as irregularity and uniqueness in all things whether fingerprints or time-space events.
The reason why I conclude with 'no heat death and no big bang' is because chaos has a law called emergence which organises structure from chaos - basically creating cosmic reheating - sure entropy and cosmic expansion but then like breathing, there is - must be - alternate recycling between expansion - chaos then drives reheating and contraction - avoiding the doomsday heat death big crunch at the end of the big bang - instead our cosmos behaves like a pair of lungs - no big bang and death - which is a one-sided chaos-free story..
Because chaos theory is ignored though - the law of emergence - a law of chaos - is also disregarded - but then who cares about the observation of empirical reality in science these days ?
To get from absolute chaos to my first idea within Tripartite Essentialism we just have to agree that there are exchanges going on in and between all things at all scales - of the type A to B through a common C with the intercession of at least one D - and actually there can only ever be 729 logical models of the integrity of this universal transaction.
key: object/event A is .. 1 integrated and viable ...................... according to criteria
0 disintegrated
D undecided/transient
ie. A = 1 0 or D
C = 1 0 or D
B = 1 0 or D
possible integrity models at time 1 for ABC = 3 x 3 x 3 = 27
possible integrity models at time 2 for ABC = 27 x 27 = 729
A universal law with 729 aspects - discovered; Hennessey, A, 1991
With a closed and limited series of octal numbers/essentialist numbers representing finite aspects of integrity and infinite aspects of integrity in a closed and limited series where infinity is the number 729 ... we have a new arithmetic/metaphysics with a finite number for infinity - and an end to the halting problem in logic and AI - cue the industrial revolution in IT
My logic language for my AI applications models natural relationships and would require a PROLOG compiler that could evaluate from charts of competitive transactions such as an inverse square power law e.g. Ohms law, Osmosis, gravity, Lewin Field Theory in psychology, Fajans rules in Chemistry etc
I have examples of the coding of HX Assembler aka HX PROLOG up on the net or from Lulu.com/scottishandrew
also in this publication is the required synthetic a priori metaphysics that will translate boolean exchanges into natural events
Not all competitive relationships are covered by the inverse square power law however and relationships can be attenuated by lack of intervening medium e.g. 1/x3 or density of intervening medium 1/x2 + (y+z) etc
This language for high level declarations in conjunction with my Tripartite relativity and knowledge representation system which can deliver isomorphism between domains and a solution to the halting problem would be pretty cool if ever someone wanted to develop the database that could describe objects at various scales.
I know - even I can forget what I was up to when I wrote the database coding notes for turning all kinds of knowledge and processes, from cosmology, particle physics, biology, AI, sociology, terraforming and even some weird ideas on deep range space travel and interdimensional pockets - about turning all of this kind of knowledge into database maps represented as part of my paradigm of threeness.
Maybe its just humans that cannot do this stuff ???
Don't let the new language or neologisms put you off - even Galileo had a problem with flat earthers to begin with ... in the 21st century we are dealing with a (scientific) world view of a flat material plane with nothing beyond inside a dying cosmic bubble - and even some churches think this is a good idea.
So I'm not expecting a Nobel Prize for modelling solutions to numerous paradoxes in the post anytime soon ...
An Unrecognised Law - exchange model abc +d produces 729 Logical atoms - Limited Independent Variety, the vindication of Russell and Wittgensteins incomplete vision of Logical Atomism.
If we could internationally agree on the logic of abcd - with our new law - our Agenda 729 we could create the technologies of Utopia.
I was telling everybody how tripartite numbers are exchangeable interchangeable with chemical elements and language and physical processes and logical atoms and physical exchange models such as osmosis and ohms law but notice how it has been edited out of my Haiku slideshare - have a happy dark age
I have discovered from an informed and intelligent source that the status quo is happy, nay delighted, with the progress it has made with bipartite relativity plus a context.
Can I just affirm and re-congratulate all those able and highly gifted thinkers - no doubt very accomplished academics and theorists who have invested so much of their time and budget in a knowledge representation system that is bipartite - lets see - what are the options in any context - noun + Verb, noun + adjective, adjective + noun, adjective + verb keep up the good work folks you almost have a real language ... so far though no-one has dreamed of a language with a noun a verb and an adjective in the one sentence or paragraph but hey ho I'm so glad that everybody is happy with what they have - none of this tripartite nonsense - two's company but three's a crowd etc
we need to preserve this tripartite modal logic for the future - high technology depends on it - lets carve it onto monuments and stones and make it sound mystical and irrational - like a book of changes - oh somebody already did that ...
Chaos theory and the under-appreciated law of emergence has it that order emerges from chaos. hence countering the entropy of the second law of thermodynamics and eliminating the big bang and its heat death. chaos also gives us uniqueness at all and every level of scale and magnitude. from particle or atom to star and galaxy - all are as unique as a fingerprint yet all modelled by 729 logical transactions of TRE
notice the unique 8 string number that got added to the presentation title - still can't see the problem with some logical truth guys
a general systems theory that can model very complex processes yet retain a logical simplicity observed in the natural world. can lead to the need for a biggish database were scanning and AI or other things involved.
its probable today though that a great deal of investment has been made in totally different strategies and recipes that incorporate the 'a posteriori' types of knowledge - this system however is 'synthetic a priori' and lawlike
an opportunity for R&D from Andrew Hennessey who might well be one of the few human beings on the planet who can model solutions to so many brick wall cul de sac paradoxes.
its so simple almost any age group can clock these simple ideas ... but then complex enough to change robotics on earth ...
still needs R&D for any application including database etc and plenty of people klingingOn to their lucrative a posteriori way of doing things - this stuff is of course filed under humor as its a joke that such paradox-solving reasonableness is overlooked
Either we ignore aether and keep our paradoxes or accept that the aether and chaos model solves the so-called particle wave duality paradox. a particle is both a wave and a particle at the same time - a continuous standing wave.
The Tripartite Essentialism Paradigm is a theory in two parts.
TRE is a 2 part theory
1. The Physical Theory - hence the poem 'It's only ontological'
2. The Metaphysics - hence the poem 'It's only logical'.
Transhumanism, Posthumanism, Assimilation, Soulless, - is there any kind of technology that could help the remnant of even Humanity v3 - OR IS IT ALREADY TOO LATE ?
Macro Game Theory is the complete opposite of Prof. John Nash's 'microcosm' where in very specific instances - everybody will win something.
The Macrocosmic Game Theory by Andrew Hennessey is an opportunity - given colours can be numbers - to look at how massive and complex systems can be manipulated to produce a desired result. i.e. a game theory of the type 'somebody could win 'everything'' - for some that is a colourful idea !!
Although self-evident and independent of the 'Threeness metaphysics/physics' called TRE - it could be a powerful tool if the TRE Knowledge Representation System was harnessed
The latest product releases from Outshore Multimedia and Andrew Hennessey on Amazon and Kindle, and Routenote records
http://www.stargateedinburgh.com the tour
books at http://www.scottishandrew.co.uk Amazon and Kindle
research at http://www.xenopolitics.com
main site at http://www.scottishandrew.com
music at http://www.scottishandrewrecords.co.uk
Announcing a 2017 re-edit of the TRE notes, Updated and revised, the,editing has removed /is removing the rhetoric and duplication and new important clarity and corroboration has been added..
why are time crystals a hoax ??
how does the Turing problem get solved when no-one else has ever been able to ?
phase 1 edit is complete - phase 2 - final phase academic edit this year.
new
Coming soon in 2017 - 9 settings to recalibrate your Stargate's destination !!
accurately predict exotic matter
I can demo a crude mapping process for isomorphism, AI, stargates etc but realistically needs more R & D
From conversations I've had so far with silicon valley - folks are very Happy with the kind of lo-fi AI they already have ...
Hey 20 years from now somebody might wonder what super AI is .... lol
don't worry be happy ....
The New Star Party - Interstellar Vision from 1990's Andrew Hennessey
The New Star Party's Interstellar vision was written mainly in 1992 in the days before exopolitics, disclosure and xenopolitics. Indeed many of its ideas are now classic 21st Century sci-fi ideologies ... and many have not yet seen the light of day.
Here are my rambling thoughts on what sort of cosmos an interstellar human could end up living in ... if that were to be allowed etc
A precis of the TRE metaphysics in use as Artificial General Intelligence - Systems Architecture 101 - a poem
can you imagine being locked into a rut trying to explain to people that 1 + 1 = 2
or abc(d) = 729
Lockheed (skunkworks) in the USA allegedly begot the American Deep Space Platform in the 1970’s by a system of physics and wave theory supplied by Frank Harvey Ferguson called ‘constrained undulating motion’, Dr Ferguson was a chief scientific director with a team of 50 Phds. US naval research, lockheed, radar scientist and stargate researcher.
Logical Atomism by Hennessey 1991 would have helped translate the energy to matter quantum bits q-bits into d-bits data bits.
ps sorry for the unaccountable loss of text on some of those explanatory slides
with free energy technology there is no need for most of the social engineering arguments within agenda 21 except of course that its not ok to pollute.
we dont need to burn trees, oil, atoms, atmospheres etc in an endless circus of fission
the tools of purification and irrigation and non-human robotic factories are here now - enough to sustain indefinitely a global population perhaps 10x the one thats allegedly giving environmental trouble.
a clean and pure and sustainable megapopulation Utopia is possible now
check out the downloads and list of assumptions - agree or disagree
I disagree with Hawking's partial chaos cosmoloy - in my view chaos is absolute
solving major paradoxes with basic ontology
Agenda729 - save the world - its a reasonable thing to do
A is 1 zero or d
B is 1 zero or d
C is 1 zero or d
a b and c could have 3 values at any time 1
abc is therefore 3x3x3 = 27 at time 1
and at time 2 abc is 27 x any other of the 27 = 729
a = valid invalid or don't know 1 0 or d
729 models of the integrity of an abc exchange
Why so many paradoxes, why no chaos theory why has the sneer review system failed us ?
Its an entertaining anecdote that in 1992 when Dawkins was writing 'climbing mount improbable' on the slow billion year evolution of the eye a guy down the other end of the faculty corridor called Brian Goodwin was demonstrating with a chaos and complexity model the spontaneous emergence of the eye in modelled natural chaos (acetabularia sp.). The end of Darwin as Dawkins knew it - for Darwins modelling was of the age of the abacus not the 21st century of supercomputing. Did Dawkins ever 'come out' and admit that his vision of Darwin was archaic and wrong from that day in 1992 ... but then Brian Goodwin is no longer at that prestigious uni with his refutations .... lets not let chaos theory and non-linearity stand in the way of a faith-filled scientism charade eh Richard. If Dawkins deserves his mantle of the Pontiff of Reason and Science - he really should have embraced the chaos theory and moved Darwins books into his 'history section' - but he didn't do that in over 20 years ... something wrong with that isn't there - see www.santafe.edu
my job would be as the sign to thing signified consultant - keeping the database behaviour and structure an expression of natural laws.
If it remains within these specifications then its numbers and its encoded knowledge have a far greater meaning and implication e.g. synthetic a priori than merely some after the fact assembly of objects, lists and labels. 'a posteriori' is where all AI coding is at this time which is why there is still a halting problem and paradoxes