1(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
By,
MOHAMMED HAROON RASHEED
B.A.LL.B (Hons.), [BSW] & [LLM]
Advocate
Email ID: adv.mdharoon@gmail.com
Facts
 The defendant firm P.E. Guzdar & Co. mortgaged 42,
Chowringhee Road, Calcutta, to the National Bank of
India by delivery of the title deeds to secure an
overdraft in their current account with the bank.
 But later he asked the bank to give him back the title-
deed so that he may show it to intending purchaser.
2(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
 He further said that only after selling the property he
can satisfy the debt of the bank.
 Believing on his words bank handed over the title-
deeds to him.
 Having regained possession of the title deeds, he
mortgaged the property in like manner to Lloyds Bank
to secure another loan.
3(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
Issue
 The question is, which of the two mortgages in the
circumstances is entitled to priority?
4(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
Analysis and law
 Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882), Sections 48, 58,
59, 78, 79.
 Normally the intending purchaser goes to the creditor
having possession of title deeds , and confirm the title
by inspecting it.
 The bank is not supposed to handover the deed to
anyone till the time money is returned to the bank.
5(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
 But the bank has committed gross-negligence by
returning the title-deed to the respondent.
 Thereby giving opportunity to induce another person
to advance money
6(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
Judgment
 Therefore, the court held that under section 78 the
subsequent mortgagee i.e. Lloyds bank would get
priority over national bank.
7(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
8(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE

Llyods Bank case

  • 1.
    1(c)2014 MD HAROONRASHEED, ADVOCATE By, MOHAMMED HAROON RASHEED B.A.LL.B (Hons.), [BSW] & [LLM] Advocate Email ID: adv.mdharoon@gmail.com
  • 2.
    Facts  The defendantfirm P.E. Guzdar & Co. mortgaged 42, Chowringhee Road, Calcutta, to the National Bank of India by delivery of the title deeds to secure an overdraft in their current account with the bank.  But later he asked the bank to give him back the title- deed so that he may show it to intending purchaser. 2(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 3.
     He furthersaid that only after selling the property he can satisfy the debt of the bank.  Believing on his words bank handed over the title- deeds to him.  Having regained possession of the title deeds, he mortgaged the property in like manner to Lloyds Bank to secure another loan. 3(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 4.
    Issue  The questionis, which of the two mortgages in the circumstances is entitled to priority? 4(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 5.
    Analysis and law Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882), Sections 48, 58, 59, 78, 79.  Normally the intending purchaser goes to the creditor having possession of title deeds , and confirm the title by inspecting it.  The bank is not supposed to handover the deed to anyone till the time money is returned to the bank. 5(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 6.
     But thebank has committed gross-negligence by returning the title-deed to the respondent.  Thereby giving opportunity to induce another person to advance money 6(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 7.
    Judgment  Therefore, thecourt held that under section 78 the subsequent mortgagee i.e. Lloyds bank would get priority over national bank. 7(c)2014 MD HAROON RASHEED, ADVOCATE
  • 8.
    8(c)2014 MD HAROONRASHEED, ADVOCATE