SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CURRENT RATIO

                                  Current Assets
Current ratio       =        -------------------------
                                Current Liabilities

                   Year       Current Assets   Current Liabilities   Current Ratio

                 2006-2007      24678965           21128392              1.16


                 2007-2008      21588683           11339964              1.90


                 2008-2009      20683915           25537988              0.80




ANALYSIS

The current ratio decreased to 1.16 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to
1.90 in 2007-2008, later it is again fallen down to 0.80. This shows that there is no
improvement in the short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.
2                                         2006-2007
                 1.8                                        2007-2008
                 1.6                                        2008-2009
                 1.4
                 1.2
                  1
                 0.8
                 0.6
                 0.4
                 0.2
                  0
                                Current Ratio


INTERPRETATION:

 Due to instability in the rate of ratios, it shows that there is no improvement in the
short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.
Liquid Assets
          Acid test ratio        =      ----------------------------
                                           Current liabilities


                        Year         Liquid assets   Current liabilities   Liquid ratio


                     2006-2007        23362359           21128392             1.10


                     2007-2008        15428377           11339964             1.36


                     2008-2009        16701025           25537988             0.65



ANALYSIS

The liquid ratio is decreased to 1.10 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to
1.36 in the year 2007-2008. This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the
short-term liquidity .
1.4                                       2006-2007
                                                            2007-2008
                  1.2                                       2008-2009
                    1

                  0.8

                  0.6

                  0.4

                  0.2

                    0
                                   Liquid ratio

INTERPRETATION:

This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the short-term liquidity of the
company. This is mainly because of low realization of sundry debtors and an in
increase in quick assets and decrease in cash and bank.
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
                                                         Total debts
                      Debt-Equity ratio     =      ----------------------
                                                         Equity

                     Year      Total debt       Equity      Debt-Equity Ratio
                   2006-2007   24812845     28416205              0.87
                   2007-2008   15626471     28057713              0.56
                   2008-2009   14358681     30391887              0.47




ANALYSIS

Debt equity ratio is 0.87 in 2006-2007 and it is decreased to 0.56 in the year 2007-
2008 though it was decreased to 0.47 in the year 2008-2009. This shows that there is
improvement in the long-term solvency position of the company.
GRAPH SHOWING DEBT-EQUITY RATIO



        0.9                                                   2006-2007

        0.8                                                   2007-2008
                                                              2008-2009
        0.7
        0.6
        0.5
        0.4
        0.3
        0.2
        0.1
         0
                          Debt-Equity Ratio



INTERPRETATION:
It indicates the relative proportions of capital contribution by creditors and
shareholders.
Equity
Proprietory Ratio =    ----------------------
                           Total Asset

                        Year         Equity     Total Assets   Proprietory Ratio

                      2006-2007    28416205      53229050            0.53

                      2007-2008    28057713      43684184            0.64

                      2008-2009    30391887      44750568            0.67




  ANALYSIS
   This ratio is decreased in the year 2006-2007 to 0.53 when compared to 2005-2006
  and further increased to 0.67 in the year 2008-2009 when compared to 2007-2008.
  this shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business.
TABLE SHOWING PROPRIETORY RATIO




               0.7                                     2006-2007
               0.6                                     2007-2008
                                                       2008-2009
               0.5
               0.4
               0.3
               0.2
               0.1
                0
                             Proprietory Ratio



INTERPRETATION:
This shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business.
It shows proprietor have invested their portion to the growth and welfare of
the company.
Fixed Assets (After depreciation)
Fixed assets to Net       ---------------------------------------------
worth Ratio       =            Shareholder’s         funds

                   Year          Fixed Asset      Net worth         Fixed assets to
                                                                    Net worth Ratio
                 2006-2007        6079307         28416205                0.21

                 2007-2008        5378748         28057713                0.19

                 2008-2009        7775901         30391887                0.25




ANALYSIS
The ratio of fixed assets to net worth ratio is found to be fluctuating in the year
2006-2007 and 2007-2008. But it is slightly increased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.25.
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO

                                               Sales
Stock Turnover Ratio              =        ----------------
                                               Inventory


                       Year        Sales           Inventory   Stock turnover
                                                                   Ratio
                    2006-2007    483975 21         22444998        2.15
                    2007-2008    62649553          17500270        3.57
                    2008-2009    90124231          29520878        3.05



  ANALYSIS

  Inventory turn over ratio has decreased to 2.15 in the year 2006-2007 when
  compared to 2005-2006 and again increased in the year 2007-2008 to 3.57 but in the
  year 2008-2009 it shows a fall that is 3.05.
GRAPH SHOWING INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO


         4                                              2006-2007
                                                        2007-2008
       3.5
                                                        2008-2009
         3
       2.5
         2
       1.5
         1
       0.5
         0
                        Stock turnover Ratio


INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, its shown the adequacy of goods available to sell in
comparison to the actual sale order. Running out of stock due to low inventory
(high turnover) may indicate future shortages. It also identifies of poor
management.
Credit Sales
Debtors Turnover Ratio        = ------------------------
                                Average Debtors


                    Year            Credit Sales      Debtors   Debtors
                                                                Turnover
                                                                 Ratio

                  2006-2007          48397521        11818945     4.09

                  2007-2008          62649553         4174430     15.0

                  2008-2009          90124131         5947413    15.15


ANALYSIS

The debtors turn over ratio has decreased to 4.09 in the year 2006-2007 and again
has increased to 15.15 in the year 2008-2009.
GRAPH SHOWING DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO


                                                          2006-2007
              16
                                                          2007-2008
              14
                                                          2008-2009
              12
              10
               8
               6
               4
               2
               0
                           Debtors Turnover Ratio




INTERPRETATION:

This shows that the company is running out of cash shortage. Since credit
facilities are provided to debtors, it has lead to less avoid of competitors.
Debtors
Debt collection period = ---------------- * 365 days
                         Credit Sales
                    Year          Debtors       Credit Sales   Debt collection
                                                                   Ratio
                  2006-2007      11818945        48397521         89 Days

                  2007-2008       4174430        62649553         24 Days

                  2008-2009       5947413        90124131         24 Days



ANALYSIS

The debt collection period ratio remains constant in the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009
but has increased in the year 2006-2007 to 89 days .
GRAPH SHOWING DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD RATIO



                                                           2006-2007
                  90
                  80                                       2007-2008

                  70
                                                           2008-2009
                  60
                  50
                  40
                  30
                  20
                  10
                   0
                                Debt collection Ratio




INTERPRETATION:

The debt collection period ratio has increased to 89 days in the year 2006-2007. but
has remained constant in the future i.e,24 days. Hence it shows that the company
has been extending its credit facilities to customer to avoid competition.
credit purchases
 Credit Turnover Ratio =        -------------------------------------
                                         average creditors



                     Year      Credit purchase      Creditors       Creditors turn
                                                                        over Ratio
                  2006-2007      25501189           12827919              1.98

                  2007-2008      32984848           7452623               4.42

                  2008-2009      69718267           20032834              3.48


ANALYSIS

The creditors turnover ratio has decreased to 1.98 in 2006-2007 again it is increased
to 4.42 in 2007-2008 but again there is slight fall in the year 2008-2009 to 3.48.
GRAPH SHOWING CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO



                                                          2006-2007
        4.5
                                                          2007-2008
          4
        3.5                                               2008-2009

          3
        2.5
          2
        1.5
          1
        0.5
          0
                     Creditors turn over Ratio


INTERPRETATION:
There has been a decline in creditors turn over ratio in 2006-2007 but a rise in
next year and again a decline in 2008-2009
Sales
Fixed assets turnover ratio     =   ------------------
                                       Fixed Asset

                      Year              Sales            Fixed Assets   Fixed assets turn
                                                                           over Ratio
                    2006-2007         48397521            6079307             7.96
                    2007-2008         62649553            5378248            11.64
                    2008-2009         90124131            7775901            11.59




ANALYSIS

Fixed assets turnover ratio is 7.96 in the year 2006-2007 and more or less remains
constant in the years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 with slight variations standing at
11.64 and 11.59.
GRAPH SHOWING FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO



                                                     2006-2007
   12
                                                     2007-2008
   10                                                2008-2009

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0
               Fixed assets turn over Ratio




INTERPRETATIONS:
There is a an increase in fixed asset turnover ratios from year 2006-2007 and it
remains almost the same for two year 2007 to 2009.
GROSS PROFIT RATIO

                         Gross profit
 Gross profit ratio = ------------------ * 100
                         Sales


                       Year           Gross         Sales           Gross
                                   profit                     profit Ratio
                  2006-2007        -------------   48397521        --------

                  2007-2008         3711530        62649553        5.92%

                  2008-2009         2736963        90124131        3.03%




ANALYSIS

Gross profit ratio has increased in the year 2007-2008 to 5.92% having no profits in
the year 2006-2007 and shows a fall in 2008-2009 to 3.03%.
GRAPH SHOWING GROSS PROFIT RATIO


                                                        2006-2007
             0.06                                       2007-2008

             0.05                                       2008-2009

             0.04

             0.03

             0.02

             0.01

                0
                            Gross profit Ratio




INTERPRETATION:

This shows that the gross profit relate to sales is average and the profit standpoint is
that the firm be able to generate adequate profit on each unit of sales.
NET PROFIT RATIO
.
                            Net profit
Net profit ratio     = ------------------- * 100
                             Sales

                         Year         Net profit      Sales       Net profit
                                                                  Ratio
                    2006-2007          -----------   48397521       -------

                    2007-2008          -----------   62649553       -------
                    2008-2009          2334174       90124131        2.6%


    ANALYSIS

    The net profit ratio has decreased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.02% having no profit
    in the immediate previous years . This shows there is decline in the profitability of
    the company
GRAPH SHOWING NET PROFIT RATIO




                0.0002                                    2006-2007
                                                          2007-2008
               0.00015                                    2008-2009


                0.0001


               0.00005


                     0
                                 Net profit Ratio




INTERPRETATION:
It is shown that net profit ratio is low which would indicate some mismanagement
in the areas ex cluding production. This shows there is decline in the profitable of
the company.
OPERATING RATIO
                   Operating cost
Operating ratio = ------------------------ * 100
                            Sales



                         Year         Operating     Sales     Operating
                                      cost                    Ratio
                    2006-2007         15647946     48397521    32.33%

                    2007-2008         11102218     62649553      18%

                    2008-2009         21072481     90124131    23.38%



ANALYSIS
The operating ratio in the year 2005-2006 increased to 32.33% . But it is increased
in the year 2007-2008 to 23.38% when compared to that of 17.72% in the year 2006-
2007. So this is the reason for decline in the net profit of the company
GRAPH SHOWING OPERATING RATIO



                                                            2006-2007
                   35.00%
                                                            2007-2008
                   30.00%
                                                            2008-2009
                   25.00%
                   20.00%
                   15.00%
                   10.00%
                    5.00%
                    0.00%
                                    Operating Ratio




INTERPRETATION:

There was an increase in operating ratio in 2006-2007 and decline in 2007-2008
and a slight increase in 2008-2009.
RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED
                                 Net profit before tax
  Return on capital employed = -----------------------------     * 100
                                 capital employed


                         Year         Profit before      Capital               Return on
                                        tax           employed           capital employed


                    2006-2007           -106398         53229050                 -------

                    2007-2008           3711530         43684184                 8.5%

                    2008-2009           2736963          44750568                6.1%


ANALYSIS

The return on capital employed ratio shows nil return on capital employed in the year
2006-2007 because of losses incurred by the company in that year. In the next year it
reaches to 8.5% which is 6.1% more when compared to the one in the year 2008-2009 .
GRAPH SHOWING RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED


                                                          2006-2007
                 0.09
                 0.08                                     2007-2008
                 0.07
                                                          2008-2009
                 0.06
                 0.05
                 0.04
                 0.03
                 0.02
                 0.01
                   0
                             Return on capital employed




INTERPRETATION:

Capital employed is strong in 2007 & 2008 and its decline in 2008 & 2009
Net profit after tax – preference dividend
Earning per share= -------------------------------------------------------------
                            no. of equity shares




                               Year          Number of       Profit after      Earnings
                                         equity shares        tax           per share
                         2006-2007             15000          -----------          --------

                         2007-2008             15000          -----------          --------

                         2008-2009             15000          2334174               156
  ANALYSIS:

  The earnings per share have increased to 156 in the year 2008-2009 when
  compared to all the remaining previous year’s earnings per share.
GRAPH SHOWING EARNING PER SHARE (EPS)


                 160
                                                         2006-2007
                 140
                                                         2007-2008
                 120
                                                         2008-2009
                 100
                  80
                  60
                  40
                  20
                   0
                              Earnings per share


INTERPRETATION:

From the above table, it can easily understood that the company EPS is
steadily progressed. The share capital of the company has increased without
the proportionate increase in the net income.
1.In spite of incurring losses ,it has successfully managed to overcome this by
making profits in future, which is a good sign of prosperity to the company.

2.The long-term solvency position of the company has shown a recurrent increase.

3.The sales of the company has increased in the year 2008-2009 which indicates that
the foreign companies are well satisfied with the company’s product, which is a
good sign to company’s prosperity.

SUGGESTIONS
1.Modern Collections should make proper financial planning so that the available
funds are utilized in more efficient and effective manner.
2.The company must try to maintain its short-term liquidity position, by investing
only in those investments, which are easily convertable into cash
The company should reduce the idle capacity in order to increase the efficiency in
the operations.
3.Modern Collections must take immediate measures to reduce the length of the
Operating cycle
Liquidity ratios  its me

More Related Content

Similar to Liquidity ratios its me

Ratios Analysis
Ratios AnalysisRatios Analysis
Ratios Analysis
Ankit Gupta, FRM
 
Gaurav
GauravGaurav
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slidesOwens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
finance33
 
Corporate finance consumer product
Corporate finance consumer productCorporate finance consumer product
Corporate finance consumer product
Tanu Arumugam
 
Ioc
IocIoc
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
finance36
 
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_finalOwens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
finance33
 
csx Q1_2007
csx  Q1_2007csx  Q1_2007
csx Q1_2007
finance27
 
csx Q1_2007
csx  Q1_2007csx  Q1_2007
csx Q1_2007
finance27
 
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rateIndia’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
arnadkarni
 
Financial Analysis
Financial AnalysisFinancial Analysis
Financial Analysis
M Dalton
 
Ratio Analysis
Ratio AnalysisRatio Analysis
Ratio Analysis
Swarupa Rani Sahu
 
110212 divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
110212   divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles110212   divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
110212 divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
Multiplus
 
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705presatmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
finance35
 
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bankFinancial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Neeraj Singh
 
2009 annual reports of ICICI BANK
2009  annual reports of ICICI BANK 2009  annual reports of ICICI BANK
2009 annual reports of ICICI BANK
Babasab Patil
 
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
Maruf Ahmed
 
Liquidity ratio
Liquidity ratioLiquidity ratio
Liquidity ratio
Debashish Paikray
 
Ratio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
Ratio Analysis on Maruti SuzukiRatio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
Ratio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
Rahul's Ventures
 
Fra report by kshitij seth
Fra   report by kshitij sethFra   report by kshitij seth
Fra report by kshitij seth
SaritaKapoor4
 

Similar to Liquidity ratios its me (20)

Ratios Analysis
Ratios AnalysisRatios Analysis
Ratios Analysis
 
Gaurav
GauravGaurav
Gaurav
 
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slidesOwens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
Owens_Minor3Q2008_webcast_slides
 
Corporate finance consumer product
Corporate finance consumer productCorporate finance consumer product
Corporate finance consumer product
 
Ioc
IocIoc
Ioc
 
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
shaw group 8C04E297-E3DD-4F1E-8BB2-56C5BB51CEDA_SGR_AnnualShareholdersMeeting...
 
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_finalOwens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
Owens_Minor_2Q2008_webcast_slides_v_final
 
csx Q1_2007
csx  Q1_2007csx  Q1_2007
csx Q1_2007
 
csx Q1_2007
csx  Q1_2007csx  Q1_2007
csx Q1_2007
 
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rateIndia’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
India’s balance of payments and the exchange rate
 
Financial Analysis
Financial AnalysisFinancial Analysis
Financial Analysis
 
Ratio Analysis
Ratio AnalysisRatio Analysis
Ratio Analysis
 
110212 divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
110212   divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles110212   divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
110212 divulgação de resultados 4 t10 ingles
 
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705presatmos enerrgy 120705pres
atmos enerrgy 120705pres
 
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bankFinancial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
Financial statemet anlysis of co operative bank
 
2009 annual reports of ICICI BANK
2009  annual reports of ICICI BANK 2009  annual reports of ICICI BANK
2009 annual reports of ICICI BANK
 
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
Performance evaluation of Eastern Bank Ltd.
 
Liquidity ratio
Liquidity ratioLiquidity ratio
Liquidity ratio
 
Ratio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
Ratio Analysis on Maruti SuzukiRatio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
Ratio Analysis on Maruti Suzuki
 
Fra report by kshitij seth
Fra   report by kshitij sethFra   report by kshitij seth
Fra report by kshitij seth
 

Recently uploaded

Apps Break Data
Apps Break DataApps Break Data
Apps Break Data
Ivo Velitchkov
 
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned", Igor Ivaniuk
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned",  Igor Ivaniuk"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned",  Igor Ivaniuk
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned", Igor Ivaniuk
Fwdays
 
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented ChatbotsMutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
Pablo Gómez Abajo
 
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham HillinQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
LizaNolte
 
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptxPRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
christinelarrosa
 
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfHow to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
Chart Kalyan
 
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
DanBrown980551
 
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Jason Packer
 
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin..."$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
Fwdays
 
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdfSession 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
UiPathCommunity
 
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
Javier Junquera
 
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green MasterplanJavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
Miro Wengner
 
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance PanelsNorthern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Northern Engraving
 
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionSkybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Tatiana Kojar
 
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE Vision
What is an RPA CoE?  Session 1 – CoE VisionWhat is an RPA CoE?  Session 1 – CoE Vision
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE Vision
DianaGray10
 
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdfTaking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
ssuserfac0301
 
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
Vadym Kazulkin
 
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
saastr
 
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverDandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Antonios Katsarakis
 
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
Alex Pruden
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Apps Break Data
Apps Break DataApps Break Data
Apps Break Data
 
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned", Igor Ivaniuk
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned",  Igor Ivaniuk"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned",  Igor Ivaniuk
"Frontline Battles with DDoS: Best practices and Lessons Learned", Igor Ivaniuk
 
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented ChatbotsMutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
Mutation Testing for Task-Oriented Chatbots
 
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham HillinQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
inQuba Webinar Mastering Customer Journey Management with Dr Graham Hill
 
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptxPRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
PRODUCT LISTING OPTIMIZATION PRESENTATION.pptx
 
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfHow to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
 
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
LF Energy Webinar: Carbon Data Specifications: Mechanisms to Improve Data Acc...
 
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
 
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin..."$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
"$10 thousand per minute of downtime: architecture, queues, streaming and fin...
 
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdfSession 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
Session 1 - Intro to Robotic Process Automation.pdf
 
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
GNSS spoofing via SDR (Criptored Talks 2024)
 
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green MasterplanJavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
 
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance PanelsNorthern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
Northern Engraving | Modern Metal Trim, Nameplates and Appliance Panels
 
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoptionSkybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
Skybuffer SAM4U tool for SAP license adoption
 
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE Vision
What is an RPA CoE?  Session 1 – CoE VisionWhat is an RPA CoE?  Session 1 – CoE Vision
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE Vision
 
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdfTaking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
 
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
High performance Serverless Java on AWS- GoTo Amsterdam 2024
 
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
9 CEO's who hit $100m ARR Share Their Top Growth Tactics Nathan Latka, Founde...
 
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverDandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
 
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...
 

Liquidity ratios its me

  • 1.
  • 2. CURRENT RATIO Current Assets Current ratio = ------------------------- Current Liabilities Year Current Assets Current Liabilities Current Ratio 2006-2007 24678965 21128392 1.16 2007-2008 21588683 11339964 1.90 2008-2009 20683915 25537988 0.80 ANALYSIS The current ratio decreased to 1.16 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to 1.90 in 2007-2008, later it is again fallen down to 0.80. This shows that there is no improvement in the short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.
  • 3. 2 2006-2007 1.8 2007-2008 1.6 2008-2009 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Current Ratio INTERPRETATION: Due to instability in the rate of ratios, it shows that there is no improvement in the short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.
  • 4. Liquid Assets Acid test ratio = ---------------------------- Current liabilities Year Liquid assets Current liabilities Liquid ratio 2006-2007 23362359 21128392 1.10 2007-2008 15428377 11339964 1.36 2008-2009 16701025 25537988 0.65 ANALYSIS The liquid ratio is decreased to 1.10 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to 1.36 in the year 2007-2008. This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the short-term liquidity .
  • 5. 1.4 2006-2007 2007-2008 1.2 2008-2009 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Liquid ratio INTERPRETATION: This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the short-term liquidity of the company. This is mainly because of low realization of sundry debtors and an in increase in quick assets and decrease in cash and bank.
  • 6. DEBT-EQUITY RATIO Total debts Debt-Equity ratio = ---------------------- Equity Year Total debt Equity Debt-Equity Ratio 2006-2007 24812845 28416205 0.87 2007-2008 15626471 28057713 0.56 2008-2009 14358681 30391887 0.47 ANALYSIS Debt equity ratio is 0.87 in 2006-2007 and it is decreased to 0.56 in the year 2007- 2008 though it was decreased to 0.47 in the year 2008-2009. This shows that there is improvement in the long-term solvency position of the company.
  • 7. GRAPH SHOWING DEBT-EQUITY RATIO 0.9 2006-2007 0.8 2007-2008 2008-2009 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Debt-Equity Ratio INTERPRETATION: It indicates the relative proportions of capital contribution by creditors and shareholders.
  • 8. Equity Proprietory Ratio = ---------------------- Total Asset Year Equity Total Assets Proprietory Ratio 2006-2007 28416205 53229050 0.53 2007-2008 28057713 43684184 0.64 2008-2009 30391887 44750568 0.67 ANALYSIS This ratio is decreased in the year 2006-2007 to 0.53 when compared to 2005-2006 and further increased to 0.67 in the year 2008-2009 when compared to 2007-2008. this shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business.
  • 9. TABLE SHOWING PROPRIETORY RATIO 0.7 2006-2007 0.6 2007-2008 2008-2009 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Proprietory Ratio INTERPRETATION: This shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business. It shows proprietor have invested their portion to the growth and welfare of the company.
  • 10. Fixed Assets (After depreciation) Fixed assets to Net --------------------------------------------- worth Ratio = Shareholder’s funds Year Fixed Asset Net worth Fixed assets to Net worth Ratio 2006-2007 6079307 28416205 0.21 2007-2008 5378748 28057713 0.19 2008-2009 7775901 30391887 0.25 ANALYSIS The ratio of fixed assets to net worth ratio is found to be fluctuating in the year 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. But it is slightly increased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.25.
  • 11. INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO Sales Stock Turnover Ratio = ---------------- Inventory Year Sales Inventory Stock turnover Ratio 2006-2007 483975 21 22444998 2.15 2007-2008 62649553 17500270 3.57 2008-2009 90124231 29520878 3.05 ANALYSIS Inventory turn over ratio has decreased to 2.15 in the year 2006-2007 when compared to 2005-2006 and again increased in the year 2007-2008 to 3.57 but in the year 2008-2009 it shows a fall that is 3.05.
  • 12. GRAPH SHOWING INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO 4 2006-2007 2007-2008 3.5 2008-2009 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Stock turnover Ratio INTERPRETATION: From the above table, its shown the adequacy of goods available to sell in comparison to the actual sale order. Running out of stock due to low inventory (high turnover) may indicate future shortages. It also identifies of poor management.
  • 13. Credit Sales Debtors Turnover Ratio = ------------------------ Average Debtors Year Credit Sales Debtors Debtors Turnover Ratio 2006-2007 48397521 11818945 4.09 2007-2008 62649553 4174430 15.0 2008-2009 90124131 5947413 15.15 ANALYSIS The debtors turn over ratio has decreased to 4.09 in the year 2006-2007 and again has increased to 15.15 in the year 2008-2009.
  • 14. GRAPH SHOWING DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO 2006-2007 16 2007-2008 14 2008-2009 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Debtors Turnover Ratio INTERPRETATION: This shows that the company is running out of cash shortage. Since credit facilities are provided to debtors, it has lead to less avoid of competitors.
  • 15. Debtors Debt collection period = ---------------- * 365 days Credit Sales Year Debtors Credit Sales Debt collection Ratio 2006-2007 11818945 48397521 89 Days 2007-2008 4174430 62649553 24 Days 2008-2009 5947413 90124131 24 Days ANALYSIS The debt collection period ratio remains constant in the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 but has increased in the year 2006-2007 to 89 days .
  • 16. GRAPH SHOWING DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD RATIO 2006-2007 90 80 2007-2008 70 2008-2009 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Debt collection Ratio INTERPRETATION: The debt collection period ratio has increased to 89 days in the year 2006-2007. but has remained constant in the future i.e,24 days. Hence it shows that the company has been extending its credit facilities to customer to avoid competition.
  • 17. credit purchases Credit Turnover Ratio = ------------------------------------- average creditors Year Credit purchase Creditors Creditors turn over Ratio 2006-2007 25501189 12827919 1.98 2007-2008 32984848 7452623 4.42 2008-2009 69718267 20032834 3.48 ANALYSIS The creditors turnover ratio has decreased to 1.98 in 2006-2007 again it is increased to 4.42 in 2007-2008 but again there is slight fall in the year 2008-2009 to 3.48.
  • 18. GRAPH SHOWING CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO 2006-2007 4.5 2007-2008 4 3.5 2008-2009 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Creditors turn over Ratio INTERPRETATION: There has been a decline in creditors turn over ratio in 2006-2007 but a rise in next year and again a decline in 2008-2009
  • 19. Sales Fixed assets turnover ratio = ------------------ Fixed Asset Year Sales Fixed Assets Fixed assets turn over Ratio 2006-2007 48397521 6079307 7.96 2007-2008 62649553 5378248 11.64 2008-2009 90124131 7775901 11.59 ANALYSIS Fixed assets turnover ratio is 7.96 in the year 2006-2007 and more or less remains constant in the years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 with slight variations standing at 11.64 and 11.59.
  • 20. GRAPH SHOWING FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO 2006-2007 12 2007-2008 10 2008-2009 8 6 4 2 0 Fixed assets turn over Ratio INTERPRETATIONS: There is a an increase in fixed asset turnover ratios from year 2006-2007 and it remains almost the same for two year 2007 to 2009.
  • 21. GROSS PROFIT RATIO Gross profit Gross profit ratio = ------------------ * 100 Sales Year Gross Sales Gross profit profit Ratio 2006-2007 ------------- 48397521 -------- 2007-2008 3711530 62649553 5.92% 2008-2009 2736963 90124131 3.03% ANALYSIS Gross profit ratio has increased in the year 2007-2008 to 5.92% having no profits in the year 2006-2007 and shows a fall in 2008-2009 to 3.03%.
  • 22. GRAPH SHOWING GROSS PROFIT RATIO 2006-2007 0.06 2007-2008 0.05 2008-2009 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Gross profit Ratio INTERPRETATION: This shows that the gross profit relate to sales is average and the profit standpoint is that the firm be able to generate adequate profit on each unit of sales.
  • 23. NET PROFIT RATIO . Net profit Net profit ratio = ------------------- * 100 Sales Year Net profit Sales Net profit Ratio 2006-2007 ----------- 48397521 ------- 2007-2008 ----------- 62649553 ------- 2008-2009 2334174 90124131 2.6% ANALYSIS The net profit ratio has decreased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.02% having no profit in the immediate previous years . This shows there is decline in the profitability of the company
  • 24. GRAPH SHOWING NET PROFIT RATIO 0.0002 2006-2007 2007-2008 0.00015 2008-2009 0.0001 0.00005 0 Net profit Ratio INTERPRETATION: It is shown that net profit ratio is low which would indicate some mismanagement in the areas ex cluding production. This shows there is decline in the profitable of the company.
  • 25. OPERATING RATIO Operating cost Operating ratio = ------------------------ * 100 Sales Year Operating Sales Operating cost Ratio 2006-2007 15647946 48397521 32.33% 2007-2008 11102218 62649553 18% 2008-2009 21072481 90124131 23.38% ANALYSIS The operating ratio in the year 2005-2006 increased to 32.33% . But it is increased in the year 2007-2008 to 23.38% when compared to that of 17.72% in the year 2006- 2007. So this is the reason for decline in the net profit of the company
  • 26. GRAPH SHOWING OPERATING RATIO 2006-2007 35.00% 2007-2008 30.00% 2008-2009 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Operating Ratio INTERPRETATION: There was an increase in operating ratio in 2006-2007 and decline in 2007-2008 and a slight increase in 2008-2009.
  • 27. RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED Net profit before tax Return on capital employed = ----------------------------- * 100 capital employed Year Profit before Capital Return on tax employed capital employed 2006-2007 -106398 53229050 ------- 2007-2008 3711530 43684184 8.5% 2008-2009 2736963 44750568 6.1% ANALYSIS The return on capital employed ratio shows nil return on capital employed in the year 2006-2007 because of losses incurred by the company in that year. In the next year it reaches to 8.5% which is 6.1% more when compared to the one in the year 2008-2009 .
  • 28. GRAPH SHOWING RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED 2006-2007 0.09 0.08 2007-2008 0.07 2008-2009 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 Return on capital employed INTERPRETATION: Capital employed is strong in 2007 & 2008 and its decline in 2008 & 2009
  • 29. Net profit after tax – preference dividend Earning per share= ------------------------------------------------------------- no. of equity shares Year Number of Profit after Earnings equity shares tax per share 2006-2007 15000 ----------- -------- 2007-2008 15000 ----------- -------- 2008-2009 15000 2334174 156 ANALYSIS: The earnings per share have increased to 156 in the year 2008-2009 when compared to all the remaining previous year’s earnings per share.
  • 30. GRAPH SHOWING EARNING PER SHARE (EPS) 160 2006-2007 140 2007-2008 120 2008-2009 100 80 60 40 20 0 Earnings per share INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it can easily understood that the company EPS is steadily progressed. The share capital of the company has increased without the proportionate increase in the net income.
  • 31. 1.In spite of incurring losses ,it has successfully managed to overcome this by making profits in future, which is a good sign of prosperity to the company. 2.The long-term solvency position of the company has shown a recurrent increase. 3.The sales of the company has increased in the year 2008-2009 which indicates that the foreign companies are well satisfied with the company’s product, which is a good sign to company’s prosperity. SUGGESTIONS 1.Modern Collections should make proper financial planning so that the available funds are utilized in more efficient and effective manner. 2.The company must try to maintain its short-term liquidity position, by investing only in those investments, which are easily convertable into cash The company should reduce the idle capacity in order to increase the efficiency in the operations. 3.Modern Collections must take immediate measures to reduce the length of the Operating cycle