The Municipal Accountability Review and Reporting (MARR) was conducted in Monkayo to review the implementation of the KALAHI-CIDSS PAMANA program. Representatives from barangays and stakeholders participated in workshops and presentations to discuss accomplishments, challenges, and recommendations. Key achievements included infrastructure projects that addressed community needs. While delays in project completion were noted, contributions from LGUs, communities, and agencies helped ensure success. Participants expressed gratitude for the program's impact and recommended expanding support to other areas.

1. CERTIFICATION
May 31, 2018
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to CERTIFY that YOLANDO P. CRUCIO of KC: PAMANA IP-CDD Maco Team
had assisted Mabini KC: PAMANA IP-CDD ACT during the Regional COA monitoring
activities in Mabini Sub Projects.
This certification is issued upon the request of the above-mentioned staff for whatever legal
purpose this may serve him best.
KENNETH JOY G. GREGORIO
Area Coordinator
KC: PAMANA IPCDD
Cluster 1

2. I- Proceedings/Actual Conduct
The Barangay Accountability Review and Reporting started with the
registration of participants at exactly 8:15 in the morning and program proper
started at 9:00 o’clock in the morning with an opening prayer led by Barangay
Captain Aurella Sasutil followed by the singing of the national anthem conducted by
Lucenda Catalan, the Barangay Secretary.
The acknowledgment and recognition of the participants and the MIAC
Members was facilitated by the master of ceremony, Ms. Jonamie C. Uy, Financial
Analyst 1 of the ACT. Dr. Sarah C. Tanghian, the Municipal Administrator,
representing in behalf of the Municipal Mayor, Joselito B. Brillantes determined and
declared that there is quorum of the representatives in attendance to the Municipal
Accountability Review and Reporting after which, a welcome message was given by
the Municipal Administrator.
Consequently, the Municipal Area Coordinator, Mr. Zhuetsyr Atamosa had a
brief discussion of the objectives of the Municipal Accountability Review and
Reporting. Please see picture below on the said event:
Subsequently, the Municipal Monitor or the Area Coordinator of the ACT
Monkayo gave an update of program reach of the KC implementation in the

3. Municipality of Monkayo starting from program enrollment, to the Municipal
Orientation which highlighted the signing of commitment of support, problem
identification up to project selection and SP implementation. Typhoon Pablo
devastation was also touched including the re focusing of the sub-project selection
and implementation to core shelter and the shifting back of SP implementation
back to the original sub-project. He also discussed the purpose of PAMANA and
the reason for the merger of the first and second cycles and the inclusion of
Barangay Poblacion which was not originally included in the identified conflict-
affected barangays (CABs) of the municipality. Presence of CABs in a
municipality is one of the basis for program enrollment in the KALAHI-CIDSS:
PAMANA. Along this line of discussion, he cited the importance of IP
engagement for the issuance of certificate pre-condition thru field-based
validation whereby IP leaders are consulted prior to SP implementation. Lastly, he
discussed on the gains of DSWD core program implementation which benefitted
the program beneficiaries thru acceleration to self-sufficiency level. This is due to
the convergence strategy of the core programs.
When is the MARR conducted?
The MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW and REPORTING
(MARR) is conducted after community-based evaluation during the “Transition”
stage and at the end of the “Implementation” stage prior to the “Social
Preparation” stage of the next cycle.
What is the MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW AND
REPORTING and how it is conducted?
In order for the participants to understand of what is Municipal Accountability
Review and Reporting (MARR), the following are presented and questions are
asked during a workshop.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Objectives of Municipal Accountability Review and Reporting
 Inform the community members on the status of the sub-project and for public
disclosure of all aspects of the implementation including synthesis from GRS and
actions taken.

4.  Review and assessment of commitments made and delivered by the MLGU and other
stakeholders.
 Identify lessons in the pooled cycle (Merged Cycles 1 & 2) and 3rd
Cycle
implementation in the barangay and municipality, and recommendations for
upcoming modalities and project cycles.
2. Consolidated Barangay Accountability Review & Reporting
Project Accomplishments:
Community Gains through KALAHI-CIDSS:
• ENHANCED ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP DISPLAYED DURING

5. • BSPMC MEETINGS/BARANGAY ASSEMBLIES
• PARTICIPATORY SITUATION ANALYSIS
• COMMUNITY MEETINGS & TRAININGS
• PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
• IMPROVING GOVERNANCE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL
• TRANSPARENT TRANSACTIONSON AND PROCUREMENT
SYSTEM
• LOCAL COUNTERPART CONTRIBUTION
• COMMUNITY RESILLIENCY THROUGH PEACE BUILDING
STRATEGIES
• AWARENESS RAISING ON LOCAL GOVERNANCE
PARTICIPATION & COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERISM
3. Municipal Accountability Review and Reporting Workshop
WORKSHOP QUESTIONS:
1. Unsa ang mga kaayohan nga nahatag sa KALAHI-CIDSS PAMANA sa
lungsod sa Monkayo? Ngano man?
Group 1:
1. Nahatagan ug kasulbaran ang mga nagkadaiyang panginahanglan sa matag barangay sa
kinatibuk-ang lungsod sa Monkayo
2. Natukuran ug facilidad sama sa
i. Day Care Center
ii. Paanakan
iii. Patubig
iv. Brgy. Hall Rehabilitation
v. Brgy. Nursery
Group 2:
1. Daghang proyekto sa Barangay dinhi sa lungsod sa Monkayo ang nahatag sa maong
ahensya.
2. Daghan mga katawhan ang nakabenepesyo sa mga proyekto nga gihatag sa maong
ahensiya diri sa lungsod sa Monkayo
3. Tungod sa maong benepesyo nga napahimuslan sa katawhan nakonhuran ang kalisod sa
komonidad ilabina sa mga kababayen-an usa na niini ang POTABLE WATER SYSTEM

6. 2. Unsa ang mga dili maayong kasinatian ang nahatag sa KALAHI-CIDSS
PAMANA? Ngano man? Ug unsa man ang inyong ikasugyot niini aron dili
na kini mahitabo?
Group 1:
1. Dinalian ang pagpatawag ug Assembliya
2. Muboang implementation period sa mga proyekto
Sugyot: Sa sunod taas-taasan na ang implementation period
Group 2:
1. Ang dili maayo nga kasinatian nga nahatag sa maong ahensya mao ang dilatar nga
pagdownload sa kwarta maoy hinungdan sa pagdelatar sa project tungod sa kakulangan sa
mga requirements/documents nga masubmit sa Community Facilatator.
3. Unsa ang mga nahatag nga kontribusyon nga nagmalampuson ang
implementasyon sa KC PAMANA? Ngano man?
Group 1:
1.Hugot nga suporta sa LGU
2. BLGU
3. Katilingban
Group 2:
1. Mga contribution nga nagmalampuson ang mga project:
-counterpart nga gikan sa LGU, BLGU, ug kusog gikan sa panaghiusa sa komunidad
4. Unsa ang mga rekomendasyon aron mas mapanindot pa ang pag-
implementar sa KC PAMANA o bag-ong mga siklo sa sunod nga modalities?
Mga hiniusang tubag
Mga reckomendasyon:
- nga unta mahataan pa ug laing proyekto ang mga barangay diri sa Lungsod sa
Monkayo.
- Nga mapadayonon ang ahensya sa pagtabang sa panginahanglan sa komunidad
diri sa lungsod sa Monkayo
Who participates in the MARR?
Participants to the MARR are the following:
1. Chairpersons or any representatives of the BSPMC Sub Committees
2. Members of Barangay Representation Committees
3. MIAC members and other Stakeholders i.e. IP representatives & etc..
4. The ACT and MCT and Core program staff

7. After the presentations and workshops facilitated by the Area Coordinator, the
respective group representatives report their groups output and proceed with questions
and answers as well as recommendations. Since there is no more project cycles to be
implemented because the KC: PAMANA implementation has completed three (3)
cycles already, the Monitoring and Technical Working Group (MTWG) was formed
and a resolution for its creation thru an Executive Order was also passed.
II- Post-conduct/ Reflection
 Reflection:
MIAC members and BSPMC Volunteers alike expressed their thanks and
gratitude for the implementation of a community resiliency-building program of the
Department of Social Welfare and Development which brought forth positive change
in their respective lives and transformed their community towards prosperity thru a
peace building effort displayed by themselves and the stakeholders.
 Recommendations:
Review DSWD policy in order for the Municipality of Monkayo, a first class
municipality, to become eligible for another KALAHI-CIDSS program. At this
juncture, the Barangay Captain of Barangay San Jose moved for the creation of the
Monitoring and Technical Working Group (MTWG) whose function is basically to
ensure sustainability of the sub projects. This group will spearhead the monitoring and
evaluation activities after six months from project turn over. The motion was jointly
seconded by Casoon and Upper Ulip Barangay Captains Anastacio C. Esguerra and
Fernando F. Latiban respectively. The members of the MTWG will form part also the
Municipal Inspectorate Team. This will be supported by an Executive Order to be
signed by Mayor Joselito B. Brillantes. The officers and members are the following:
Chair – Engr. Reynaldo L. Latiban; Co-Chair – Zhuetsyr R. Atamosa;
Members:
1. Pedro Bolonos – Olaycon Barangay Kagawad
2. Anastacio C. Esguerra – Casoon Barangay Captain
3. Marcelo Sam-o – San Jose Barangay Captain
4. Fernando F. Latiban – Upper Ulip Barangay Captain
5. Ellen Atienza – Municipal Accountant
6. Yerlin D. Cornites – MSWDO Designate
7. Dr. Olivia L. Cerbo – MHO
8. Engr. Allan D. Cabunoc – Head, Monkayo Waterworks
9. Dr. Azucena Teves – DepEd
10. Dr. Christopher Edjic – MAGRO
11. Janet B. Diel – Olaycon Barangay Captain/Liga ng mga Barangay
Secretariat: 1. Francis Martin Boyuse – MCIT

8. 2. Rebonbie M. Pagador – MCIT
Photo Documentation:
Opening Prayer and formal start of the program
ACT and Secretariat preparing for the workshop
BSPMC Volunteers and MIAC Members listening to the presentations made by the Area
Coordinator

9. BSPMC Volunteers and MIAC Members discussing their respective group presentations
Prepared by: YOLANDO P. CRUCIO
Area Coordinator