THE CLERY ACT
& CAMPUS
CRIME
Presented By: Meghan Campbell
HISTORY
Introduced to Senate as Student Athlete
Right-To-Know Act
Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act
of 1990
Clery Act 1998
Amendments in 2000 & 2008
THE JEANNE CLERY
DISCLOSURE OF CAMPUS SECURITY POLICY
CAMPUS CRIME STATISTICS
Publish Annual Security Report by October 1st each
year
Keep a public crime log- a crime must be logged
within two business days
Emergency Notifications and Timely Warnings
Institutions with Residence Halls
Policies and Procedures surrounding missing
students
LANDMARK CASES
Mullins v. Pine Manor College (1983)
Clery v. Lehigh University (1986)
Dickinson v. Eastern Michigan University
(2006)
Havik v. Johnson & Wales University
(2007)
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Perterson
(2007)
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
Institutional
Administrators, Faculty, and Staff
Students
Campus Security
BEST PRACTICES
A President’s Guide to the Clery Act
• Basic understanding for senior
administrators
• Appoint individual or committee to serve as
Clery Compliance Officer(s)
• When in doubt, report
• Don’t minimize seriousness of crime
BEST PRACTICES
CAS Standards
Mission
Program
Organization & Leadership
Human Resources
Law, Policy, & Governance
Institutional & External Relations
Technology
FURTHER CONSIDERATION
 Research by two professors out of Virginia: Gregory & Janosik
 Found 25% of students knew about Clery Act & Purpose
 10% took crime reports into consideration
 Many campus officials believe crime reports not effective in
reducing campus crime
 Campus officials did believe that helped to improve policies and
procedures
 Institutions need to consider additional programs and services
QUESTIONS?

The Clery Act & Campus Crime

  • 1.
    THE CLERY ACT &CAMPUS CRIME Presented By: Meghan Campbell
  • 2.
    HISTORY Introduced to Senateas Student Athlete Right-To-Know Act Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990 Clery Act 1998 Amendments in 2000 & 2008
  • 3.
    THE JEANNE CLERY DISCLOSUREOF CAMPUS SECURITY POLICY CAMPUS CRIME STATISTICS Publish Annual Security Report by October 1st each year Keep a public crime log- a crime must be logged within two business days Emergency Notifications and Timely Warnings Institutions with Residence Halls Policies and Procedures surrounding missing students
  • 4.
    LANDMARK CASES Mullins v.Pine Manor College (1983) Clery v. Lehigh University (1986) Dickinson v. Eastern Michigan University (2006) Havik v. Johnson & Wales University (2007) Commonwealth of Virginia v. Perterson (2007)
  • 5.
  • 6.
    BEST PRACTICES A President’sGuide to the Clery Act • Basic understanding for senior administrators • Appoint individual or committee to serve as Clery Compliance Officer(s) • When in doubt, report • Don’t minimize seriousness of crime
  • 7.
    BEST PRACTICES CAS Standards Mission Program Organization& Leadership Human Resources Law, Policy, & Governance Institutional & External Relations Technology
  • 8.
    FURTHER CONSIDERATION  Researchby two professors out of Virginia: Gregory & Janosik  Found 25% of students knew about Clery Act & Purpose  10% took crime reports into consideration  Many campus officials believe crime reports not effective in reducing campus crime  Campus officials did believe that helped to improve policies and procedures  Institutions need to consider additional programs and services
  • 9.