Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, JAIC, DIU, Mike Brown,Nand Mulchandani, Jacqueline Tame
Lecture 7 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - SpaceStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, space, space force, general Raymond, space command
Lecture 1 -Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
acquisition, Mattis, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China,
Lecture 2 -Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Matt Pottinger, Matt Turpin, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China,Xi Jinping, Tobin
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, Michael Sulmeyer, cybercom,USCYBERCOM
Lecture 4- Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, semiconductors, china, applied materials
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Disinformation
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, climate
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Acquistion
Lecture 7 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - SpaceStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, space, space force, general Raymond, space command
Lecture 1 -Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
acquisition, Mattis, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China,
Lecture 2 -Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Matt Pottinger, Matt Turpin, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China,Xi Jinping, Tobin
Lecture 8 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - CyberStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, Michael Sulmeyer, cybercom,USCYBERCOM
Lecture 4- Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, semiconductors, china, applied materials
Team Disinformation - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Disinformation
Team Climate Change - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, climate
Team Acquistion - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competition Stanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Acquistion
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, Army venture capital
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, economic coercion,
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, networks
Lecture 3 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Mike McFaul, Russia, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank,
acquisition, ash carter, Technology, Innovation and Modern War, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, kill chain, max boot, military innovation, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, LiOn Batteries
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Wargames
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, c3i, command and control
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, space force
From the “War on Terror” to the robot wars of the future? The drone wars – the beginning of November 2014 it has been their twelve-year anniversary – are an expression of a rapid development: from the “global war on terrorism” after 9/11 to the warfare of the future. A future that sometimes seem to come from the science fiction genre, in which the robot struggle the dirty wars of humankind and ultimately rise up against their creators. The latter is still far from being in the realm of the possible while paths to the creation of autonomous combat robots are, however, already been taken.
(English version of the presentation slides, April 2014)
May 1, 2020
Facilitate the Establishment of the TD-10 (Technology-Democracies 10)
Establish an initial group of ten to twelve like-minded countries that will focus on the development, protection, dissemination, development and use of emerging technologies. This coalition will grow over time and serve as the stewards of technology norms for advanced technologies for the coming decades. The objectives are twofold: Protect strategic assets of allies and facilitate development in next generation technologies.
Strategic adversaries are targeting technology assets with a range of malign practices including theft, deception, unfair trade practices, intimidation, financial seduction, frivolous litigation, cyberattack, forced technology transfer, coercion, and retaliation. Safeguarding American assets requires an effort beyond the scope of any individual, company, or government agency. It requires trusted partnerships between private and public sectors, and especially our closest technological allies in areas of investment screening, export controls, and intellectual property theft as well as solidarity in demanding reciprocity and transparency from all countries.
The TD-10 has the ability to engage industry and academia to accelerate development in initially the 10 critical innovation sectors of the Economic Security Strategy: semiconductors, AI, wireless communications, quantum, cybersecurity, space, autonomous vehicles, smart manufacturing, biotechnology, and advanced energy technologies. It will assign countries segments of expertise to maximize the investment of allied technology development; engage industry in creating blended public/private funding mechanisms; agree on levels of government-funded research; and secure critical supply chains.
The TD-10 (or TD-12) would bring together countries that are both advanced democracies and are leaders in technological infrastructure and technical capabilities that exist outside of government. These countries would use this mechanism to coordinate responses to the types of technological questions that threaten the existing world order. An initial list of countries that meet these criteria would include such members as the United States, Japan Germany, France, the Netherlands, Britain, India, Israel, Canada, South Korea, Sweden, and possibly Taiwan. are also logical candidates.
A case analysis of Nintendo that explains how the implementation of innovative strategies enables the company to remain competitive within the gaming industry.
acquisition, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, INDOPACOM, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, China, stanford
Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, ONR, Lorin Selby, Maynard Holliday, Bradley Garber,
Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, ONR, Lorin Selby, Maynard Holliday, Bradley Garber,
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, Army venture capital
Team Catena - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, economic coercion,
Team Networks - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, networks
Lecture 3 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Mike McFaul, Russia, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank,
acquisition, ash carter, Technology, Innovation and Modern War, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, kill chain, max boot, military innovation, ms&e296, raj shah, requirements, stanford, Steve blank, China
Team LiOn Batteries - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, LiOn Batteries
Team Wargames - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Wargames
Team Drone - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, c3i, command and control
Team Apollo - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, space force
From the “War on Terror” to the robot wars of the future? The drone wars – the beginning of November 2014 it has been their twelve-year anniversary – are an expression of a rapid development: from the “global war on terrorism” after 9/11 to the warfare of the future. A future that sometimes seem to come from the science fiction genre, in which the robot struggle the dirty wars of humankind and ultimately rise up against their creators. The latter is still far from being in the realm of the possible while paths to the creation of autonomous combat robots are, however, already been taken.
(English version of the presentation slides, April 2014)
May 1, 2020
Facilitate the Establishment of the TD-10 (Technology-Democracies 10)
Establish an initial group of ten to twelve like-minded countries that will focus on the development, protection, dissemination, development and use of emerging technologies. This coalition will grow over time and serve as the stewards of technology norms for advanced technologies for the coming decades. The objectives are twofold: Protect strategic assets of allies and facilitate development in next generation technologies.
Strategic adversaries are targeting technology assets with a range of malign practices including theft, deception, unfair trade practices, intimidation, financial seduction, frivolous litigation, cyberattack, forced technology transfer, coercion, and retaliation. Safeguarding American assets requires an effort beyond the scope of any individual, company, or government agency. It requires trusted partnerships between private and public sectors, and especially our closest technological allies in areas of investment screening, export controls, and intellectual property theft as well as solidarity in demanding reciprocity and transparency from all countries.
The TD-10 has the ability to engage industry and academia to accelerate development in initially the 10 critical innovation sectors of the Economic Security Strategy: semiconductors, AI, wireless communications, quantum, cybersecurity, space, autonomous vehicles, smart manufacturing, biotechnology, and advanced energy technologies. It will assign countries segments of expertise to maximize the investment of allied technology development; engage industry in creating blended public/private funding mechanisms; agree on levels of government-funded research; and secure critical supply chains.
The TD-10 (or TD-12) would bring together countries that are both advanced democracies and are leaders in technological infrastructure and technical capabilities that exist outside of government. These countries would use this mechanism to coordinate responses to the types of technological questions that threaten the existing world order. An initial list of countries that meet these criteria would include such members as the United States, Japan Germany, France, the Netherlands, Britain, India, Israel, Canada, South Korea, Sweden, and possibly Taiwan. are also logical candidates.
A case analysis of Nintendo that explains how the implementation of innovative strategies enables the company to remain competitive within the gaming industry.
acquisition, Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, INDOPACOM, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, China, stanford
Lecture 6- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Unmanned Syst...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, ONR, Lorin Selby, Maynard Holliday, Bradley Garber,
Lecture 6 - Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition - Autonomy and...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, hacking for defense, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, ONR, Lorin Selby, Maynard Holliday, Bradley Garber,
Like electricity or the steam engine, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a true general purpose technology: It can be used to drive economic gains, but also to project hard and soft power. Its widespread adoption will irrevocably change the international order as its effects on welfare, trade and defense transcend national boundaries.
In this keynote speech, Simon Mueller, Expert on AI Governance and Executive Director of the AI Initiative of The Future Society, will provide perspective on the range of issues, speak about current dynamics and discuss options to address emerging challenges.
Global Tech Security Commissioner's Playbook Keith Krach
Global Tech Security Commissioner's Playbook
Global Tech Security Commission Structure & Process
Technology
Semiconductors AI
5G and IoT Space
Quantum Biotech
Cloud Computing Robotics
Clean Energy Hypersonics
Strategies
Diplomacy
Capital Markets
Supply Chains
Export Controls
Education
IP Protection
Lawfare
Board Strategy
Intelligence
Mil-Civil Fusion
Micro Lending
Development Banks
Digital Currency Auto. Vehicles
Countries
Japan UK Germany
Canada USA South Korea Finland France Switzerland
Taiwan India Australia
Sweden Israel Netherlands
About the Center for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue:
The Center for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue (CTDP) is the world’s preeminent institution focused on tech statecraft, a new model of diplomacy that bridges the high-tech sector with the foreign policy and national security sectors to ensure trusted technology is used to advance freedom. The Center’s nonpartisan model focuses on rallying our allies, leveraging the innovation of the private sector, and amplifying democratic values based on trust. CTDP leverages Purdue University’s strength in innovation, deep expertise in technology and global prowess in educating transformational leaders combined with its uniquely qualified members’ battle-tested track record in building market leading high-tech companies, onshoring strategic supply chains, building global networks based on trust, architecting and operationalizing of successful global economic security strategies and applying Silicon Valley strategies to defeat the CCP’s 5G masterplan. “China’s techno-economic aggression presents a serious threat to the United States and the free world, especially when it comes to advanced technologies, like 5G, AI, semiconductors, and others,” Secretary Panetta stated. “The key to securing freedom is securing high tech through widespread adoption of trusted technologies. The Clean Network pioneered a trust-based model for countering authoritarian aggression across all areas of techno-economic competition. I support the adoption of that successful model by the Center for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue in its noble mission, and I am honored to join its Advisory Board.”“Purdue is best known for its technology innovation and grooming values-based transformational leaders of tomorrow who have had a profound impact on the world,” said Keith Krach, Chairman of the Center for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue. “Tapping into the genius of transformational leaders like General McChrystal and Ambassador Hormats is central to our nonpartisan mission of creating a new model of diplomacy, now known as Tech Statecraft, where trust is the coin of the realm.” “The Center has created the new category of Tech Statecraft by building the Global Trust Network that bridges the worlds of high tech and foreign policy in order to ensure trusted technology is used to advance freedom rather than authoritarianism,” said General McChrystal. “I’m thrilled to join the Center for Tech Diplomacy, which has rapidly become the foremost authority on securing freedom through Tech Statecraft.”
In this special feature from The Exascale Report, members of the HPC community weigh in on what the new Tianhe-2 supercomputer in China means to U.S. competitiveness and why the DOE needs a Battlefield Commander to take on the challenge of Exascale Computing.
Subscribe to The Exascale Report today:
http://theexascalereport.com
Global Tech Security Commission Detailed OverviewKeith Krach
Global Tech Security Commission -Build a Network of Multi-Sector Leaders to Create and Implement a Global Tech Security Strategy to Safeguard Freedom Through the Adoption of Trusted
BMNT's Hacking for Defense - Mission Results 2016BMNT Partners
Born out of a combination of the rapid problem sourcing and curation Pete Newell developed on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, and Steve Blank’s Lean Startup process, Hacking for Defense (H4D) has set the national security arena afire. H4D projects have earned recognition as the fastest way to bring technological innovations to bear on defense’s thorniest problems,
whether through a BMNT enterprise effort, or a graduate-level course facilitated by Hacking for Defense, Inc (H4Di).
We’ve developed strong partnerships with academics at Stanford, Columbia, and Georgetown Universities; military organizations like DIUx, JIDO and the NGA; and with countless startups throughout Silicon Valley. Through these relationships, we’ve been able to create a vibrant ecosystem passionate about identifying, isolating and solving problems no matter what their form.
We are proud of how far we’ve come in the last year and we are already gearing up for more in 2017. Next year promises explosive growth throughout our ventures and our team is sure that they will continue to deliver the transformative results our national security forces need.
Team Quantum - 2022 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, Quantum
Team Army venture capital - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Competi...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve Blank, Army Venture capital
Team Short Circuit - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, semiconductors
Team Aurora - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power CompetitionStanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, Army venture capital
Team Conflicted Capital Team - 2021 Technology, Innovation & Great Power Comp...Stanford University
Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition,TIGPC, Gordian knot Center, DIME-FIL, department of defense, dod, intlpol 340, joe felter, ms&e296, raj shah, stanford, Steve blank, AI, ML, AI/ML, china, unmanned, autonomy, venture capital
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Lecture 5- Technology, Innovation and Great Power Competition
1. Technology, Innovation, and Great
Power Competition
INTLPOL 340; MS&E 296
Steve Blank, Joe Felter, Raj Shah
Lecture #5: Artificial Intelligence
19 October 2021
2. Agenda
• Logistics
• Identifying and Deploying Defense Technologies for
Great Power Competition
• Global AI Arms Race and GPC
• Team Problem Statements
3. Logistics
• November 2 class rescheduled. Now Monday, November 1
at 5:30 - 8:30 PM (normal time)
• Individual Assignments due by the start of Nov. 1 class
• By next OH, teams should be focused on the problem
they would like to solve
5. Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) Director
• CEO of Symantec (‘14-’16)
• Chairman of EqualLogic
• Chairman & CEO of Quantum (‘95-’03)
• Board of Trustees of Berklee College of Music
• Stanford MBA
• Harvard BA
Mike Brown
7. “We have no competing fighting chance against China in 15 to 20
years. Right now, it’s already a done deal; it is already over in my
opinion,” he said, adding there was “good reason to be angry”.
-Nicolas Chaillan, The Financial Times, 10 October 2021
“China is not poised to overtake the U.S. in the technology domain of
AI; rather, the U.S. maintains structural advantages in the quality of
S&T inputs and outputs, the fundamental layers of the AI value
chain, and key subdomains of AI.”
Jeffrey Ding, “China’s Current Capabilities, Policies, and Industrial
Ecosystem in AI”
Have we already lost the AI fight to China?
8. • Citrix - VP
• CEO/Co-Founder
ScaleXtreme
• Accel Partners
• OpenDNS - CEO
• VMware
• Determina - CEO
• Oblix - Co-Founder
• Sun Microsystems
• Harvard MPA
• Stanford MSx
• Cornell BS
Ex JAIC, Landus, VP
• Fmr JAIC - Deputy Director
• DoD, Strategic Assessments
& Integration
• Title 60 Strategies
• House Select Committee on
Intelligence
• DIA
• SAIC
• NWC MA
• Texas A&M MPAff & BA
CTO, Joint Artificial Intelligence Center
Nand Mulchandani Jacqueline Tame
10. “Artificial intelligence is the
future, not only for Russia, but for
all humankind. It comes with
colossal opportunities, but also
threats that are difficult to
predict. Whoever becomes the
leader in this sphere will become
the ruler of the world.”
The Geopolitical Implications of AI
“As new technologies continue to
evolve, we’ll work together with our
Democratic partners to ensure that
new advances in areas from
biotechnology to quantum computing,
5G, artificial intelligence and more are
used to lift people up, to solve
problems and advance human
freedom, not to suppress dissent or
target minority communities.”
“[The PRC] must ensure that our
country marches in the front ranks
where it comes to theoretical research
in this important area of AI, and
occupies the high ground in critical
and AI core technologies...critical and
core AI technologies [must be] firmly
grasped in our own hands.”
11. How will AI affect: [D]iplomacy
Deep fake technology Collaborative big data
solutions
12. How will AI affect: [I]ntelligence
Computer Vision + Satellite Images Empowered hacking & cyber security
13. How will AI affect: [M]ilitary
Joint All Domain Command & Control (JADC2) AI/ML improved targeting
14. How will AI affect: [E]conomics
Smart / Predictive Manufacturing &
Maintenance
Improving logistical efficiency
15. ● How would you characterize the
strengths and weaknesses of the U.S.’s AI
Strategy?
● How would you advise the Biden
Administration to pursue an AI Strategy?
17. Group Project
• Problem Statement Review and Feedback
• 5 minutes per group
• Blunt and direct feedback
• “Socratic method with a stick” - Steve Blank
• We give feedback this way because it will help you move faster;
indirect feedback takes too long for the course
18. The gap between U.S. and Chinese military innovation is
rapidly closing and poses a threat to U.S. military
dominance in the Indo-Pacific Region. In order to
maintain our capability gap, the U.S. needs to reevaluate
and improve its funding strategies and partnerships with
mid-stage private companies that have potential for dual-
use technologies, which can play a vital role in catalyzing
U.S. military innovation.
Team 1: Team AVCI
19. Chinese investment in US start-ups poses a threat to US
military capabilities across critical technologies. The
greatest threats to DOD military advantage in AI/ML are
from forced JVs or possible trade secret theft, either
through direct investment or LP investment. However, it is
unclear how widespread of a phenomenon these two
threat scenarios are due to the open nature and lack of
transparency in venture capital.
Team 2: Team Conflicted Capital
20. Hong Kong presents a unique opportunity to support activists
currently attempting to maintain democratic institutions inside the
PRC. The US can amplify its soft power by supporting these activists
through facilitating free information access and secure
communication channels outside the control of the CCP security
apparatus. The US should also pursue opportunities to support pro-
democracy activists through their execution of protests,
unsanctioned expression, and other mobilization activities. The US
should explore this through application of cyber policy, encouraging
changes to tech companies’ international policies, and security /
technical support to activists.
Team 3: Project Aurora
21. How should the United States best prepare for the
upcoming paradigm shift in the semiconductor industry
through reimagined education and more effective funding
to protect the American leadership in the global supply
chain of semiconductors?
Team 4: Team ShortCircuit
22. Team Drone analyzes the People’s Republic of China's
(PRC) joint service (联合作战样式) operational concept
for the future of drone swarm support to amphibious
warfare (两栖登陆作战), Taiwan’s current Overall
Defense Concept (ODC) at the intersection of Counter
Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-sUAS), and
emerging US swarm defense tech in conjunction with the
DoD's official "C-sUAS Strategy," in order to protect
against asymmetric PRC's swarm technologies in a
potential Taiwan Strait crisis.
Team 5: Team Drones
23. The US Space Force needs innovative mechanisms to incorporate
emerging capabilities and concepts to successfully lead in space and
defend American interests.
In order to deter adversaries in space, the USSF must leverage
commercial innovation and establish a trained, experienced
acquisition workforce that can effectively balance commercial and
government-only capabilities that will deliver acquisition and
innovation impact that the Space Force requires. Further aligning
commercial and military interests and operations in space will best
protect American interests in space.
Team 6: Apollo
24. China’s mass state-sponsored hacking of American
government agencies and corporations presents a serious
security and economic risk to our nation. Particularly with
their sizable investments and rapidly advancing
development of quantum computing technology, China
presents an important cybersecurity danger in the near
future that must be addressed to prevent a catastrophic
outcome in this great power competition.
Team 7: Catena
26. Reach out to teaching team with questions!
Midterm Memo - Key Reminders
• Due Monday, November 1 @ 23:59 PST
• No more than 2,000 words
• Prompt Guidance
• Select one technology (i.e. semiconductors)
• Describe how one U.S. competitor is using it to counter U.S.
interests
• Propose how the U.S. should respond
• Follow today’s case methodology
27. Next Week
• Class 6 Topic: Autonomy
• Updated readings will be
on Canvas shortly
• TA Team will post Week 6
Reading Reflection prompt
once readings are updated
• AMAZING guest speakers
• Updated problem statements
and interview trackers due
Mondays @ 11:59 PM PST
28. Technology, Innovation, and Great
Power Competition
INTLPOL 340; MS&E 296
Steve Blank, Joe Felter, Raj Shah
Lecture #5: Artificial Intelligence
19 October 2021
29. ● How would you characterize the
strengths and weaknesses of China’s AI
Strategy?
● Do you agree more with Kai-Fu Lee or
Jeffrey Ding’s analysis? Why?