The document provides tips for managing accountability in virtual teams. It discusses challenges with accountability in virtual settings, such as monitoring progress and assigning responsibility. It recommends using action plans to clarify expectations, timelines, and checkpoints. Regular check-ins allow teams to discuss progress and problems. The document also provides tips for holding people accountable after missed commitments, such as asking what contributed to the issue and how to prevent it going forward. Frequent communication of goals and responsibilities helps enhance accountability in virtual teams.
2. PRACTICAL TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL VIRTUAL LEADERSHIP
LEADING
DISTANCE
F R O M A
Presented by
Rick Lepsinger
President, OnPoint Consulting
3. “Out of sight, foremost in mind.
How do you manage people whom
you don’t see regularly?”
~ Charles Hardy
Harvard Business Review
3
4. Understand what you can do to improve the
quality of your v-meetings.
Develop strategies and actions to build and sustain
trust in a virtual environment.
Learn skills and techniques to effectively coach and
manage accountability from a distance.
4
Today’s Objectives
5. What is your greatest challenge
when leading from a distance?
Please use your chat window to respond.
Chat with Us
5
6. Why Virtual Work is Different
6
Infrequent or no face-to-face contact
Difference in time zones
Significant reliance on technology
7. 7
A total of 48 virtual teams participated in
the study:
427 team members and team leaders
completed the team survey.
99 stakeholders completed the team
performance assessment.
Virtual Team Study
8. 8
16 organizations from a variety of industries:
Pharmaceuticals
Financial Services
Consumer Products
Hospitality & Leisure
Manufacturing
Insurance
Professional Services
Telecommunications
Technology
Non-Profit
Virtual Team Study
9. More than 25% of virtual teams in the OnPoint study were
not fully performing.
MIT research found that up to 82% of virtual teams were
not effective.
OnPoint found that 50% stakeholders and about 33% of
team members rated their virtual leaders as less than
effective.
Key Findings
9
10. 10
Key Findings
Many organizations simply
recycle practices for co-
located teams without really
considering what makes virtual
collaboration unique.
12. RAMP Model
Relationships
Accountability
Motivation
Purpose and Process
12
Conducting Effective V-Meetings
13. The Current State
800% increase in virtual workers during the past 5
years.
Use of virtual meetings has increased at 80% of
companies.
Only 62% of people are somewhat satisfied with the
v-meetings they attend.
73% report “getting everyone engaged” and “multi-
tasking” are always or often challenges.
13
Sources: Managing On Line Meetings Interaction Associates, 2009 and Effective Leadership in a Virtual Workforce ASTD, 2013.
14. Situation #1
14
Joan leads a team of 6 people who are geographically dispersed across
North America, India, and Europe. Team members have recently been
overwhelmed with work, and as a result, the team had to push back
several deadlines.
Today, Joan scheduled a meeting to provide an update on one of the
projects, which was the only item on the agenda.
During the meeting, Joan noticed
very little participation. The
“engagement meter” in the
meeting software showed that
people were not paying attention
for most of the call.
15. Polling Question
A. Cultural preferences may have prevented some
participants’ from actively participating in the
meeting.
B. Lack of consideration for the purpose and agenda
of the meeting.
C. Team members’ heavy workload may have
distracted them.
15
What factor contributed most to low levels of
engagement during the v-meeting?
16. Situation #2
16
To capture their input, Joan invited 8 stakeholders to join the team’s
discussion about the pricing strategy for a new product.
During the WebEx session, Joan encountered multiple problems, one was
people talking over each other. There also were long pauses when
participants waited to see if other people were finished
on what strategy would work the best.speaking. Because Joan wanted to encourage an
open discussion, she did not facilitate the
discussion and focused mostly on capturing key
points.
The meeting had to be adjourned after 1.5
hours. However, the group did not reach a
decision about the pricing strategy.
17. Polling Question
A. Meeting duration
B. Number of participants in attendance
C. No one facilitated the discussion effectively
D. The use of WebEx for this meeting format
17
What factor contributed most to problems during
the v-meeting?
18. Before the V-Meeting
General Considerations
Confirm that a meeting is necessary; avoid information pass
meetings.
59% of leaders report spending more time preparing
for a status meeting than on the meeting itself.
60% of respondents indicate that they multitask during
status update meetings.
Rotate meeting times to accommodate time zone
differences.
Plan more frequent but shorter, 30-60 minute meetings.
18
19. 19
Participants
Ensure everyone is responsible for an agenda item.
Rotate the planning and facilitator role.
Manage participant numbers.
Post participants’ photos on whiteboard.
Before the V-Meeting
20. Before the V-Meeting
Logistics
Send all materials ahead of time or post them
on a shared site to give participants a chance
to review and prepare questions.
Establish an “level playing field” – avoid having
some people attend using phone/video or
computer while others attend in person.
The medium matters – match technology to
the task.
20
21. 21
Match Technology to Task
Objective/Task Recommended Technology
Share information or ideas
Email or telephone; Team Sites; Lync as
appropriate
Provide updates Email or telephone; Team Sites
Generate ideas
Teleconferences or videoconferencing;
collaborative software such as WebEx
(to allow for “brainstorming”)
Email or telephone (when the focus is on the
exchange of individual suggestions)
Solve problems
Teleconferences or videoconferencing;
collaborative software (e.g., WebEx)
Make complex decisions
Teleconferences or videoconferencing;
collaborative software (e.g., WebEx)
Building relationships, negotiating, or
gaining commitment; resolving conflicts
Face-to-face (if possible), videoconferencing
22. To increase
engagement during
the v-meeting:
Make time for
relationship building
Ensure interaction
Provide tools
During the V-Meeting
22
23. Build Relationships
23
Build time into the agenda for “water cooler” conversation.
As people sign on, greet people and make small talk.
Take a personal interest in team members just as if you saw
them in the office.
Use empathizing to check in and clarify feelings and
emotional reactions.
Establish processes to build trust and relationships (e.g.,
group activity, breakout groups).
Build time into the agenda for “water cooler” conversation.
As people sign on, greet people and make small talk.
Take a personal interest in team members just as if you saw
them in the office.
Use empathizing to check in and clarify feelings and
emotional reactions.
Establish processes to build trust and relationships (e.g.,
group activity, breakout groups).
24. Ensure Interaction
24
Only schedule v-meetings for problem solving and decision
making.
Keep the duration of meetings short.
Ensure everyone knows why they are on the call and what
their role is.
Set expectation for participation in advance.
Call on people who are not participating (give them notice by
saying their name first and then repeat the question).
Only schedule v-meetings for problem solving and decision
making.
Keep the duration of meetings short.
Ensure everyone knows why they are on the call and what
their role is.
Set expectation for participation in advance.
Call on people who are not participating (give them notice by
saying their name first and then repeat the question).
26. Provide Tools
26
Ask people to use the “hand” icon when they have a
comment or question.
Provide video capability on the desktop (Lync, WebEx).
Use collaborative software (WebEx, Lync) so everyone is
looking at the same material and can follow along.
Use the whiteboard to take notes, record ideas, put things
in a “parking lot” for later discussion.
Share minutes on the screen.
Use chat/IM functionality to help people connect.
Ask people to use the “hand” icon when they have a
comment or question.
Provide video capability on the desktop (Lync, WebEx).
Use collaborative software (WebEx, Lync) so everyone is
looking at the same material and can follow along.
Use the whiteboard to take notes, record ideas, put things
in a “parking lot” for later discussion.
Share minutes on the screen.
Use chat/IM functionality to help people connect.
28. Cross Cultural Tips
Distribute a “world” calendar that shows all national holidays
and vacation periods for the countries that are represented
on the team.
Allow more time to make a point or cover an agenda item.
Provide transitions from one topic to the next and summarize
key points and next steps at the end of the meeting.
Some cultures tend to break in frequently to ask questions,
challenge ideas or disagree while others prefer to maintain
group harmony by never disagreeing. Probe gently if you
think others are holding back their opinions. Consider the
reaction of others before you interrupt.
28
29. Cross Cultural Tips
Some cultures are more or less formal. Ask how team
members would like to be addressed (e.g., are first names
acceptable). If unsure, be more formal.
Different cultures place different importance on punctuality
and timing. Understand the differences and discuss and agree
on standards and procedures the team will follow. Be
prepared to be flexible if differences are significant.
Some cultures place great value on the speed of decision
making while others place greater importance on the need to
be inclusive. Agree on a decision making process that
balances cultural sensitivity and efficiency.
29
30. RAMP Model
Relationships
Accountability
Motivation
Purpose and Process
30
Building Trust in a Virtual Setting
32. High levels of trust boost work
engagement, leading to increased
performance, greater levels of personal
initiative, and proactive behavior.
32
~ Schaufeli and Salanova, 2007
Quick Fact
33. The Current State
Among 600 respondents, 81% reported the greatest personal
challenge is difficulty establishing rapport and trust.
46% never met other virtual team members face to face, and
30% met only once a year.
Virtual teams are more challenging than face to face teams
when it comes to managing conflict (73%), making decisions
(69%), and expressing opinions (64%).
33
Source: "The Challenges of Working in Virtual Teams“ RW3 Culture Wizards 2010
34. Top-performing virtual teams had significantly
higher levels of task-based trust (a belief that team
members will do their job) than did low-performing
teams.
Interpersonal-based trust is more difficult, but not
impossible, to achieve.
34
The Role of Trust
35. The Trust Quotient
C + R + I
S
T trustworthiness
C credibility
R reliability
I intimacy
S self-orientation
T =
35
36. Truthfulness
Credentials
I can trust what
she says about…
Dependability
Predictability
I can trust him
to…
Discretion
Empathy
I can trust her
with…
ActionsActions SecuritySecurity FocusFocusWordsWords
Credibility Reliability OrientationIntimacy
Four Factors of Trustworthiness
36
37. Tips for Building Trust
Credibility: speak more truth
Avoid exaggeration, answer direct questions with direct
answers.
Admit when you don’t know.
Show expertise by offering to help find a solution.
Partner team members at different locations and rotate
these partnerships.
C + R + I
S
TT ==
37
38. Tips for Building Trust
Reliability: commit to more actions; do them
Make many small promises.
Make your work process consistent.
Use others’ terminology.
Use RACI or other role clarity tools.
Use action plans to set expectations.
Make your work visible.
C + R + I
S
TT ==
38
39. Tips for Building Trust
Intimacy: take more risks
Set up a team page.
State your feelings.
Demonstrate empathy.
Call to have non-work conversations.
Be accessible.
Make face time happen or schedule virtual
coffee chats or lunches.
C + R + I
S
TT ==
39
40. Tips for Building Trust
Self-orientation: think of others more
Avoid interrupting people.
Identify shared goals.
Look for common ground.
Find out what’s important to others.
Get input and buy-in to agendas.
INAY: It’s Not Always About You.
C + R + I
S
TT ==
40
41. RAMP Model
Relationships
Accountability
Motivation
Purpose and Process
41
Managing Accountability Remotely
43. Accountability Defined
We take initiative.
We accept responsibility for our actions.
We accept responsibility for how our
actions impact others.
We admit when we make mistakes.
No excuses. No blaming.
43
44. Autonomy is essential – meeting deadlines and quality is more
important than when people work.
Different metrics might be necessary to measure performance.
More challenging to monitor and discuss progress.
Team members’ contributions are less visible and “social
loafing” may occur.
Lack of physical proximity may make it difficult for people to
prioritize projects as things shift.
Accountability in a Virtual Setting
44
45. David Missing Deadlines
45
Through your efforts to understand the
reasons for the team’s performance
plateau, it has come to your attention
that David has been consistently missing
deadlines. He recently missed two
important deadlines which caused a
delay in a product release.
David’s performance is negatively
impacting the team and you need to take
action. However, because David does
not report directly to you, managing this
may be difficult. David’s Manager is your
colleague, Pamela Jones.
46. A. Call Pamela Jones, David’s boss, to explain the issue with David’s
performance and explore what she can do to help enhance his
accountability.
B. Send David an email to ensure that he understands the impact of
missed deadlines on the team and its customers.
C. Ask David what he will do to get the projects back on track, what he
will do to keep from missing deadlines in the future, and what he might
have done that contributed to the problem.
D. Clarify your expectations for David’s performance and for his current
projects agree on periodic check points when you and he will discuss
progress and anticipate potential problems.
E. Hold a team v-meeting to discuss the importance of meeting deadlines
and identify solutions to existing barriers that are getting in the way.
Polling Question
46
47. 1. Talking about an idea, but not agreeing to actions and accountability by
people’s names, and people thus assuming someone else is going to do
the work.
2. Agreeing on an action, but without any discussion of a completion date,
so the end date is open to interpretation and differing opinions.
3. Waiting until the completion date to check on the results, or not even
checking in at all.
4. Not holding people accountable for missed commitments after the fact.
Four Accountability Busters
47
48. Set People Up
for Success
Action
Timetable
Checkpoints
48
Accountability Booster
49. Virtual Guidelines for Using ATC
Action
Use action plans and team project management sites to
clarify expectations and who is accountable.
Create a system to store team documents and
communications.
Timetable
Set specific deadlines; post action plan on shared site.
Use automatic reminders to notify team members.
Checkpoints
Agree to check in at key milestones; integrates project
management with coaching.
Provides an opportunity to build trust and relationships.
49
50. After-the-Fact Accountability Booster
Past: “What could you have done to prevent the problem?
What, if anything, did you do that might have possibly
contributed to the problem”?
Present: “What can you do NOW to get on track?”
Future: “What can you do to prevent this problem from
happening again in the future?”
Three Coaching Questions
50
51. Frequently reinforce and update team goals and individual
responsibilities.
Leverage technology to track progress on assignments
(e.g., shared sites and project management sites).
Use meaningful metrics that connect individual
contributions to team goals.
Ensure transparency in individual tasks and goals and
project status.
Accountability Tips
51
52. Periodically collect feedback from stakeholders to assess the
team’s level of performance.
Encourage a problem-solving attitude instead of making
excuses or blaming others.
Use checkpoints as “coachable moments” for “course
correction” and as an opportunity to build trust.
Reinforce positive behavior and address below standard
performance in a timely manner.
Accountability Tips
52
54. How is coaching different in
a virtual setting?
Chat with Us
54
Please use your chat window to respond.
55. Need to address issues relevant for virtual workers such as
isolation or work/life balance due to time zone challenges.
Fewer opportunities to “observe” performance.
Even more feedback is needed, yet fewer opportunities to
deliver it in a timely manner.
Some communication channels might distort the tone or
understanding of your message.
Due to the lack of visual cues, active listening skills become
even more essential.
Virtual Coaching Is Different
55
56. Skills for Listening
Paraphrasing
Empathizing
Skills for Responding
Balanced Response
56
High-Impact Communication Skills
“They may forget what you
said, but they will never
forget how you made them
feel.”
~ Carl Buechner
57. Paraphrasing
How to: Summarize the content of what the other person
has said, in your own words.
Purpose: Shows that you understand (but not necessarily
agree with) what the other person said.
If you disagree, restate the other person’s point of view
before stating your own.
57
58. Example
Statement
“I’m not sure about how to handle the situation with the client
and because I’m new to the account I think it would be better
if you spoke with her.”
Paraphrase
“You’re concerned that because you’re not familiar with the
history of this account you won’t handle it properly?”
58
59. Empathizing
Summarize your understanding of how the person is feeling
and why – the emotional component of the message.
Be patient and non-judgmental.
Do not interrupt. Let people vent if they are upset.
Overcome the urge to ignore, disagree with, or reject what
people say.
59
60. Example
Statement
“Solve one problem and up pops another. What’s the use?”
Empathetic Response
“It can be pretty frustrating, and even discouraging, to
encounter problem after problem.”
60
61. Balanced Response
A technique for providing constructive feedback about an
idea or proposal a virtual team member or colleagues has
suggested without being confrontational or diminishing self-
esteem.
Benefits of a balanced response:
Allows strengths to be leveraged regardless of weaknesses.
Allows weaknesses to be overcome without losing sight of strengths.
Highlights points of agreement.
Ensures consideration of new and unusual ideas.
Positions concerns for problem solving.
61
62. Using a Balanced Response
First, state what you like about the person’s idea or
suggestion—focus on the positives.
Second, state what you see as the key concerns or what
keeps the person’s idea or suggestion from being totally
acceptable.
State these concerns in an actionable, “How to...” form.
Use “and” when transitioning from your positive comments
to your concerns rather than “but”.
62
63. This exchange between a manager and her colleague is an
example of a balanced response:
Colleague:
“Rolling out this new reporting format now would be a big
mistake. We need another two weeks of development
before we can say it’s more efficient and informative.”
Manager:
“You’re right about the additional time. It would mean that
we have a format that’s reliable. How can we do this without
appearing unresponsive?”
63
Balanced Response Example
64. Pay attention to tone of voice and inflection.
Don’t assume – provide context and more detail.
Ask specific questions to make up for the lack of visual
cues.
Encourage the other person to respond – ask for a verbal
response.
Ask the person to restate what they heard.
Increase your use of paraphrasing and empathizing to
confirm understanding and build relationships.
64
Remote Coaching Tips
65. Effectively use technology to bridge
the ‘virtual gap’.
Foster an atmosphere of collaboration
among team members (i.e., build trust,
resolve team conflict).
Ensure that everyone is engaged and
participates in team discussions.
Communicate team goals/direction
and create a sense of purpose.
65
Great Virtual Leaders
66. Put processes in place to facilitate
information sharing and decision
making.
Hold virtual team members accountable
for results.
Ask for ongoing feedback.
66
Great Virtual Leaders
67. Connect with Us
Rick Lepsinger
onpointconsultingllc.com
HRDQstore.com | 800.633.4533
@OnPoint_LLC
ricklepsinger
Editor's Notes
Welcome/introductions
Session will cover some of the key topics related to making your meetings high impact. This work comes out of more than 10 years of research and consulting on virtual teams, which is further outlined in our recent book, Virtual Team Success.
We have tried to make it fairly interactive. We will not cover every single page in workbook but it is a very useful reference.
This notion of leading from a distance – whether you are a project lead who manages virtual teams or you who manage remote employees- has continued to received a great deal of attention. As this quote from Charles Handy suggests, effectively leading people we do not see has become a very real business challenge. Therefore, the objective of today’s session is to help shed some light on what makes top performing VT leaders so successful.
TRANSITION: Let‘s take a look at our agenda.
Review session objectives
Let’s take a few minutes to discuss some of the specific challenges that you face when leading from a distance.
After discussion, reinforce key points and make transition to research, which tried to address some of the very challenges that you mentioned.
There are three characteristics of a virtual environment that impacts our ability to effectively collaborate, communicate and lead from a distance
Infrequent or no face-to-face contact
Lack of visual cues and feedback makes communication more difficult and increases the chance of misunderstandings
Inhibits spontaneous interactions
More difficult to build relationships/trust
While communication among members of co-located teams can be difficult, imagine the problems when people don’t have any visual cues. Although management and communication experts have known about the impact eye contact and body language has on our understanding of what another person is saying, we don’t fully appreciate it until those elements are missing. It turns out that “words” and “tone of voice” is only two-thirds of the communication. The other critical element is visual cues.
This lack of contact also makes it more difficult to build personal relationships and establish trust. A great deal of the knowledge we have about people and their interests and values is gained through spontaneous, informal interactions at the coffee break, during lunch, or during informal breaks when we “visit” with people to chat. That type of spontaneous informal interaction is absent in a virtual setting and can be difficult to replicate.
Here is a snapshot of the study participants. Companies like Barclays, Kraft, Deloitte, Merck, AHA and Verizon Wireless participated and we have representation across a range of industries.
So what did we learn? The study confirmed that we know virtual team leaders are critical to team success, and as you can imagine, there are some unique challenges in a virtual setting. More than 25% of virtual teams in our study were not fully performing. We thought that this was a large number and then other research from MIT found that 82% of the virtual teams were not effective.
We were also very surprised to find that one third of team members and about 50% of stakeholders said that the virtual leaders were not fully performing. That means that about 40-50% of leaders are not perceived as being effective, which is a big number.
So why are companies investing in virtual collaboration when many virtual teams and leaders are not succeeding?
When we looked closely, it appeared that many organizations recycled guidelines and practices for co-located teams without consideration for the unique issues virtual teams and virtual leaders face.
When we took a close look at what factors differentiate top VTs, we came up with the RAMP model, which is a tool that outlines the four key dimensions for virtual success. As a VT leader, you would benefit from evaluating the extent to which these factors are in place in your team.
Relationships –this encompasses building trust in a virtual environment, managing conflict and enhancing collaboration.
Accountability is about establishing clear goals and making sure that individual and team commitments are still met
Motivation – how do you motivate people you may not see? This dimension is about engaging and recognizing people and the team as a whole
Purpose and Process is about creating a sense of shared purpose and establishing clear processes to support virtual work.
TRANSITION: Now that we have introduced the RAMP model, we will take a closer look at each dimension and provide tips that are essential for remote leadership. We will also give you a few opportunities to test your knowledge in situations that are common for VT leaders. We are going to start with the topic of enhancing trust in a virtual setting.
How many of you have been attending a WebEx meeting that you felt was not informative or engaging? How many of you were multi-tasking?
Correct = B (it was an information pass meeting and she may not have used time properly)
C = correct response
Here are some tips based on our research study and consulting that help leaders enhance the quality of their v-meetings.
Consider shortening meetings: “Conduct a 15 minute “stand up” meeting every Monday – review accomplishments, commitments for the next week and potential obstacles”
TRANSITION: Let’s take a look at media richness in more detail.
This chart shows the type of technology that might be most appropriate for the examples of objective/task listed on the left
Some virtual teams choose certain technologies for communication that hurt rather than help them reach their objectives.
Consider how much collaboration will be necessary to successfully complete the task or objective, and then determine the appropriate level of “naturalness.”
For example, email, which is a one-way medium, is best for tasks that require little collaboration. When teams need to solve complex problems or make decisions, technology such as videoconferencing or collaborative software tools, are best.
The table provides guidelines for matching the right technology to your objective.
NOTE: Merck uses WebEx, teleconference, videoconference, email, Sync Communities, Teamsites, Microsoft Lync (IM).
There are three elements that help facilitate v-meeting engagement. Review the three. Let’s look at each in a bit more depth.
Pick up phone to call and check in without an agenda
Consider periodically “going around the virtual table” to quickly check in and ensure that people do not interrupt one another. Let people know that they can “pass”.
IM people privately during the call – I haven’t heard from you, do you have a perspective?
Use polling and chat to collect opinions and perspectives; encourage “yes” to talk with “no”; hook folks up to discuss issues off line
Consider periodically “going around the virtual table” to quickly check in and ensure that people do not interrupt one another. Let people know that they can “pass”.
IM people privately during the call – I haven’t heard from you, do you have a perspective?
Use polling and chat to collect opinions and perspectives; encourage “yes” to talk with “no”; hook folks up to discuss issues off line
Consider periodically “going around the virtual table” to quickly check in and ensure that people do not interrupt one another. Let people know that they can “pass”.
Microsoft 360 – camera that sits in the center of the table
When we took a close look at what factors differentiate top VTs, we came up with the RAMP model, which is a tool that outlines the four key dimensions for virtual success. As a VT leader, you would benefit from evaluating the extent to which these factors are in place in your team.
Relationships –this encompasses building trust in a virtual environment, managing conflict and enhancing collaboration.
Accountability is about establishing clear goals and making sure that individual and team commitments are still met
Motivation – how do you motivate people you may not see? This dimension is about engaging and recognizing people and the team as a whole
Purpose and Process is about creating a sense of shared purpose and establishing clear processes to support virtual work.
TRANSITION: Now that we have introduced the RAMP model, we will take a closer look at each dimension and provide tips that are essential for remote leadership. We will also give you a few opportunities to test your knowledge in situations that are common for VT leaders. We are going to start with the topic of enhancing trust in a virtual setting.
Trust is a necessary component for effective team interaction. Without it it’s hard to have open and straightforward conversations or to have confidence that people will share critical information at the right time.
We show trustworthiness as an equation made up of Credibility, Reliability, Intimacy, and Self-orientation. This model comes from extensive research from Trusted Advisors and is a very useful model of trust in a v-setting.
Let’s look at each element of the model more closely.
Credible—the words we say, the credentials we have, and the way in which people experience us make people trust us
Reliable—the actions we take, our predictability, and the ways in which people find us familiar make people trust us
Intimate—the extent to which people feel they can confide in us and perceive us as discreet and empathetic make people trust us
Self-orientation—the more people feel we are focused on ourselves, rather than them, the less they trust us; the more people feel we are focused on them, rather than on ourselves, the more they trust us.
Looking at each element :
CREDIBILITY (words) – (your stakeholder) “I trust what she says about SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS; she’s very credible on the subject.”
The usual: write white papers, get technical certifications
The less usual: speak plainly and honestly -- say you don’t know, never “spin”
RELIABILITY (actions) – “I trust him to DELIVER WHEN HE SAYS HE WILL; he’s very reliable.”
You prove yourself to be dependable and predictable over time
Be on time, do what you say you will do, create project docs with consistent look and feel, be rigorous about using good biz practices like meeting agenda, issue tracking
Interestingly, of the 12,000+ people who have taken our online TQ quiz, people who lead with C + R had among the lowest overall trustworthiness scores.
Which leads us to I and S (emotional/psychological)
INTIMACY (safety) – “I trust her with THIS INFORMATION; she won’t embarrass me.”
You’re discreet and empathetic -- easy to relate to
You demonstrate that you understand the person’s situation and the problems and challenges they face
You’re an incredible listener, you’re willing to share something personal, you acknowledge uncomfortable situations, you express appreciation for others
SELF-ORIENTATION (focus – as in yours) – “I trust that he cares about HOW THE PROJECT WILL IMPACT MY CAREER; he really seems to have my best interests at heart”
Results
Ask Q’s to figure out what success looks like
Negotiate for win-win
Refer to a competitor (internal or external) if the competitor could do better
The arithmetic of the Trust Equation suggests that self-orientation plays an outsized role; by placing it in the denominator, it carries 3 times the weight of each of the other factors in the numerator. This is intentional: a perceived lack of caring or inattention (i.e. high self-orientation) is more harmful than lower scores in the remaining trust components (i.e. credibility, reliability, intimacy).
Key Point: Building trustworthiness can be seen as the tension between needs – yours or the other person’s?
Your need to look smart (talk) OR their need to be heard (listen without distraction)?
Your need to be liked (avoid confrontation) OR their need to have all the data so they can make good decisions (speak a hard truth)
Your need to be the hero (compete for attention) OR their need to feel confident (give them the credit)?
It may seem counter intuitive that admitting you don’t know something enhances credibility. But it increases the likelihood that people will take what you say seriously when you do make a proposal or offer an opinion
Offer your expertise to help team member find solution to a specific problem, which is of value to the team member.
Partnering people at different locations not only gives them a chance to establish credibility but it also addresses the issue of silos among virtual team members and provides opportunities to build relationships
Rather than commit to the entire project deliverable, commit to key milestones along the way and keep those commitments
“Using your partner’s jargon, not yours, helps to create the feeling of familiarity in your very first encounter”
Clarifying roles, regardless of the tools you use, ensures people know what’s expected of them and increases the likelihood they will meet their commitments and expectations
Two simple, low tech tools, that support reliability are to do lists and action plans. They each help keep commitments and due dates in front of us so we can “do what we said we would do”
When you’re working remotely people can’t see you work and may not be aware of what you’ve accomplished. Shared space like “Sharepoint” enables virtual team members to post their work so everyone can see that commitments have been met.
Posting action plans is another way to demonstrate progress and that individual and sub-group commitments have been met.
As we’ve said, empathy is a key component of building trust.
In a virtual setting where you may have never met the people you work with, this becomes an even more important factor
A team page helps people put and name and a face together
If you are comfortable stating your feelings it makes it easier for team members to respond in kind
Calls or IMs to have non-work conversations is an example of how virtual leaders change their behavior and habits to bridge the virtual gap. This action replaces the informal conversations we have with people when we’re co-located.
Shared goals and common ground make it easier to focus on the other person
As we’ll see in the next section on influence, this behavior not only builds trust but is essential for gaining someone’s support and commitment
Remember that INAY. Everyone thinks their priorities are the most important. It helps to put things in context of a bigger picture.
Let’s take a deeper dive into the second topic, managing accountability remotely.
Accountability is a topic that often comes up when we ask virtual leaders what they find challenging. This is especially true if you are leading matrixed or project teams where team members do not report to you.
Like this cartoon shows, it is much easier for people to hide from accountability in a virtual setting and we will discuss this further shortly.
Transition: Let’s take a minute to define accountability and look at the accountability scale, which is one useful way to consider this concept.
Managers need to trust employees and not micro-manage and check-in too often
At the same time remote employees might not be aware of the change in priorities, so leaders need to help people adjust priorities when situation changes
Team members become less aware of what others are doing. Therefore there might be less peer influence to accomplish certain tasks on time.
Managers need to balance the need to monitor the performance with the need to respect person’s autonomy. Virtual environment also makes it less convenient for people to discuss hesitations or challenges they face in working on the project. So the managers need to proactively probe if there are any obstacles and if the employee needs support in overcoming these.
With less face time, there are fewer opportunities to directly observe performance. This is why it might make sense to develop alternative performance measures. It can also be the case that metrics need to be comparable across team members with different areas of responsibility. For such instances we might want to consider an example of one of the virtual leaders from and IT consultancy:
“I’ve created an activity based scoring template: every activity has a certain score based on strategic involvement in organizational goals (weekly basis).” Scoring template provides quantitative measure of performance (goal is 600 points). On weekly team calls everybody talks about individual goal achievement.
Ask people to submit recap/summary of daily/weekly activity/accomplishments (e.g., merchandisers take photo of product set up, insurance engineers submit site inspection reports)
You “Wait and hope” that poor performance will improve on its own without a conversation about meeting commitments and delivering results.
You assume that sending indirect messages and subtle signals will convey your dissatisfaction and clarify what needs to happen differently.
You are certain that differing points of view will lead to an uncomfortable conversation or a real disagreement, and decide to let it go and avoid the conflict.
You have not clarified what “good looks like” or when you want projects done, meaning the baseline of clear expectations has not been set.
You are inclined to give top performers more leeway because you don’t want to break their momentum.
You equate following up and monitoring progress with micro-managing, and fear being labeled negatively.
You take on the work yourself and become complicit in the cycle of poor performance and lack of accountability.
What do you do to address the situation with David?
Top leaders choose RESPONSE C, which uses a technique called the 3 Accountability questions to address the source of a problem, what a person will do to resolve the problem, and what they will do to prevent it in the future. In some highly matrixed organizations or where you have a new team leader who does not know the individual well, RESPONSE A could be very effective. In this case, you would call David’s boss to help problem solve the issue prior to reaching out to David.
Response B, sending an email, is not effective, especially because emails can be misinterpreted.
Response D, is a good response in that it gets at a resolution for the current problem. However, it does not address the source of the problem, which could mean that this happens again.
Response E, a team meeting, is not effective since it does not really address David’s individual performance issues. There is also a good chance that this action could lead to frustration by other team members, who know that David is the source of the problem and believe that he is not being held accountable.
Now that we have given you a few situations to practice dealing with accountability, let’s take a look at the 4 mistakes many leaders make and then we will also discuss 2 strategies for enhancing accountability.
We call these the four “accountability busters” - The bottom line is, you can’t hold people accountable if you haven’t been clear about expectations or due dates.
Let’s take a look at the first accountability tool.
The first tool is used to set people up for success and provide the foundation for holding others accountable. The acronym ATC (air traffic controller) can help you to remember this technique.
Review the technique:
Action – Regardless of how good an idea someone has or how sincere their intention, nothing happens until someone commits to taking some action. Actions must be stated in behavioral language. Who specifically will do what? You can’t hold someone accountable if you have not been clear about the expected deliverables.
Timetable – This defines who will do what by when? Commitments that don’t have a time frame usually fall by the wayside. You can’t hold someone accountable if you have not been clear about the due date.
Checkpoints – This defines checking in NOT when the action should be completed (checking in at this point is too late if there is a problem), but completing a progress check BEFORE the completion date. If you agree on check points with the person it allows you to monitor without the other person feeling like you are micromanaging or abdicating your responsibility. It also provides and opportunity for coaching, problem solving and “course corrections” well before the deadline
Action and Timetable example - “Make sure that the status of goals is posted in central place (everybody can see them, but won’t list sensitive stuff). Make it more visible what others are doing, ensure transparency.”
Timetable:
Pre-scheduled follow-ups along the way;
Send monthly progress toward goals report to everyone – increase transparency
During weekly calls talk as a team to reinstate objectives and accountabilities (peer pressure)
Review the second strategy for accountability:
If someone misses a target, you can coach the person you are trying to hold accountable by asking him/her to review these three questions.
Let’s spend a few minutes applying the accountability concepts to your own team/team members/direct reports.
Leaders on less effective VTs struggled with accountability. During our interviews, we heard things like “the leader does not follow up to make sure we hit deadlines” or “no one really holds one another accountable for what we are responsible for as a team”.
One team set up a team handbook to outline accountabilities and key goals, and they periodically updated this over time.
Because people are often expected to work more independently in virtual teams, finding ways to delegate work, to give team members freedom to make decisions and to monitor work become particularly important for success. Top virtual team leaders establish mechanisms to monitor team member’s work without micromanaging.
While accountability seems straightforward, many leaders forget the basics when working virtually.
While we will not spend a lot of time on remote coaching, it is a hot topic and one that people are often interested in since some leaders struggle with it. Let’s spend a few minutes talking about why coaching is different in a virtual setting.
How is coaching different in a virtual context? What is more challenging?
There is a need to address some challenges specific to virtual work: feeling of alienation, being out of the loop, balancing work-life commitments (out of hour meetings), misunderstanding. Employees might need coaching and support in dealing with these issues.
Less opportunities to directly observe performance: may be necessary to review team communication to understand the level of performance, or collect 360 assessment
Feedback becomes even more important, since overall there are fewer other opportunities for employee to understand how he/she is doing
Different perceptions regarding email: research shows that when sender thinks email is positive , the receiver perceives it as neutral; when sender thinks email is neutral, receiver perceives it as negative.
Before we share some coaching tips, let’s practice applying coaching skills to a few challenging situations.
Paraphrasing is restating what you heard the other person say in your own words. It is used to show that you understood, but not necessarily that you agree with, what the other person said. If you disagree, or in a conflict situation, restate the other person’s point of view before stating your own.
Mention that misunderstandings can occur when people are face to face
Because of the lack of visual cues the likelihood of misunderstandings greatly increases when people are working virtually.
The increased (proactive, frequent, and consistent) use of paraphrasing is an example of the change in behavior and habit effective virtual leaders make.
When?
You want to check your understanding of what the person said
The person has said something confusing or complex
A team member is rambling or stuck on a point
Why?
Shows that you understand (but not necessarily that you agree with) what the other person is saying
Moves the conversation along without eroding self-esteem
How?
Summarize the content of what the other person has said, in your own words. Do not show approval or disapproval, and avoid “parroting” the person (using his/her exact words)
Work hard to understand the other person’s point of view (rather than planning your rebuttal)
If you disagree, restate the other person’s point of view before stating your own
A balanced response is a technique for providing constructive feedback about and idea or proposal a matrix partner has suggested without being confrontational or diminishing self-esteem. A balanced response has several benefits. It allows strengths to be leveraged regardless of weaknesses, it allows weaknesses to be overcome without losing sight of strengths, it highlights points of agreement, it ensures consideration of new and unusual ideas, and it effectively positions concerns for problem solving. Let’s take a look at how to effectively apply this communication technique.
A balanced response has two parts. First, state what you like about the person’s idea or suggestion—focus on the positives. Then, state what you see as the key concerns or what, in your opinion, keeps the person’s idea or suggestion from being totally acceptable. State these concerns in an actionable, “How to...” form. Also always use “and” when transitioning from your positive comments to your concerns rather than “but.” The word “but” negates the positive comments and sends the unintended message, “what I really want to focus on are my concerns.” On the next screen you’ll see an example of a balanced response.
This exchange between and manager and her direct report is an example of a balanced response since the manager focused on the positive aspects of her downline’s idea. Also, she added to the thought by using a “how to” statement.
Ask lots of obvious questions – ask questions that might be obvious if you were face-to-face
Here is a summary of what differentiates best in class virtual leaders. Keep in mind that the behaviors necessary to be successful when leading from a distance are not totally unique and new. However, it does require being proactive and more planful, particularly since many of these behaviors become more challenging when working or leading virtually.
Top performing VT leaders balance the execution-oriented and the interpersonal skills necessary. As we saw, focusing on the RAMP model provides leaders with a way to ensure that they are attending to the factors required for success.
The real secret, however, is that there is not secret. It’s not about a new management skill that makes working virtually possible. The best virtual leaders understand this and have bridged the “virtual gap” by adjusting their behavior and work habits to accommodate the unique characteristics of their virtual environment.
I hope that today’s session provides you with practical tips and guidelines to successfully lead from a distance.
Here is a summary of what differentiates best in class virtual leaders. Keep in mind that the behaviors necessary to be successful when leading from a distance are not totally unique and new. However, it does require being proactive and more planful, particularly since many of these behaviors become more challenging when working or leading virtually.
Top performing VT leaders balance the execution-oriented and the interpersonal skills necessary. As we saw, focusing on the RAMP model provides leaders with a way to ensure that they are attending to the factors required for success.
The real secret, however, is that there is not secret. It’s not about a new management skill that makes working virtually possible. The best virtual leaders understand this and have bridged the “virtual gap” by adjusting their behavior and work habits to accommodate the unique characteristics of their virtual environment.
I hope that today’s session provides you with practical tips and guidelines to successfully lead from a distance.