At Tulsa, our best Criminal Defense Attorney Mark J. Cagle and Stephen W. Lee are dedicated to defend serious crimes including Murder, Rape and Robbery.
Black History Makers in Modern America --Federal Focus (Part 1) Tanya Ward Jordan
The Coalition For Change, Inc. (C4C) recognizes Black Americans who have selflessly advocated for others in pursuit of justice and equality. Part One- recognizes Mr. Matthew Fogg, Ms. Paulette Taylor and Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo
At Tulsa, our best Criminal Defense Attorney Mark J. Cagle and Stephen W. Lee are dedicated to defend serious crimes including Murder, Rape and Robbery.
Black History Makers in Modern America --Federal Focus (Part 1) Tanya Ward Jordan
The Coalition For Change, Inc. (C4C) recognizes Black Americans who have selflessly advocated for others in pursuit of justice and equality. Part One- recognizes Mr. Matthew Fogg, Ms. Paulette Taylor and Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo
Minority Youth and Crime Minority Youth in CourtYouth in genera.docxannandleola
Minority Youth and Crime: Minority Youth in Court
Youth in general, and young minority males in particular, often are demonized by legislators, the media, scholars, and the public at large. These attacks reinforce stereotypes and place a particularly heavy burden on young Black and Latino males.
LINDA S. BERES AND THOMAS D. GRIFFITH, “DEMONIZING YOUTH”1
In June 2001 Lionel Tate, an African American boy who was 12 years old when he killed a 6-year-old family friend while demonstrating a wrestling move he had seen on television, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Tate, who claimed that the death was an accident, was tried as an adult in Broward County, Florida; he was convicted of first degree murder. One month later, Nathaniel Brazill, a 14-year-old African American, was sentenced by a Florida judge to 28 years in prison without the possibility of parole. Brazill was 13 years old when he shot and killed Barry Grunow, a popular 30-year-old seventh grade teacher at a middle school in Lake Worth, Florida. Although Brazill did not deny that he fired the shot that killed his teacher, he claimed that he had only meant to scare Grunow and that the shooting was an accident. Like Tate, Brazill was tried as an adult; he was convicted of second degree murder.
These two cases raised a storm of controversy regarding the prosecution of children as adults. Those on one side argue that children who commit adult crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults; they should be prosecuted as adults and sentenced to adult correctional institutions. As Marc Shiner, the prosecutor in Brazill’s case, put it, “This was a heinous crime committed by a young man with a difficult personality who should be behind bars. Let us not forget a man’s life has been taken away.”2 Those on the other side contend that prosecuting children as adults is “unwarranted and misguided.” They assert that children who commit crimes of violence usually suffer from severe mental and emotional problems and that locking kids up in adult jails does not deter crime or rehabilitate juvenile offenders. Although they acknowledge that juvenile offenders should be punished for their actions, they claim that incarcerating them in adult prisons for the rest of their lives “is an outrage.”3 According to Vincent Schiraldi, president of the Justice Policy Institute, “In adult prisons, Brazill will never receive the treatment he needs to reform himself. Instead, he will spend his time trying to avoid being beaten, assaulted, or raped in a world where adults prey on, rather than protect, the young.”4
Nathaniel Brazill is still incarcerated in the Brevard Correctional Institution. Assuming that none of his pending appeals are successful, he will not be released until 2028, when he will be 41 years old.5 Lionel Tate’s conviction, on the other hand, was overturned by a Florida appellate court in 2003. The court ruled that Tate should be retried because his competency to stan ...
Deborah LaBelle - A Notable Professional From Michigan.pdfDeborah LaBelle
Deborah LaBelle has represented clients before the United States Supreme Court and in international forums with an integrated model for reform utilizing concurrent litigation, documentation, and advocacy strategies. Find out more about her at her official site http://www.deborahlabelle.com/
Running head CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY .docxsusanschei
Running head: CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY
1
CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY 9
Criminals and Society
11/23/2016
Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults that is the question. When courts take away trial and sentencing options, it is not possible to provide justice in every case. The great number of juvenile crimes, from petty vandalism to violent homicide, are handled by the juvenile justice system and not adult courts. The separation of the two systems is a recognition of the differences between juveniles and adults and offers juveniles greater opportunities for forgiveness and redemption. Juvenile courts exist mainly to rehabilitate youth who’ve done wrong. But that’s not possible or appropriate in every case. Some juveniles commit crimes so horrific in their depravity that justice could not be carried out in the juvenile system. Other crimes, and their perpetrators, show maturity that should be dealt with adult punishment. An example spanning both classes was a 16-year-old Sarah Johnson’s plot to murder her parents and pin the crime on an intruder. Her case was transferred to adult court, and Johnson was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. as reported by NYTIMES (2016).
Minors who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults but incarcerated in specific prisons. The reason is that regular prisons would negatively influence minors and may make them even more violent. These minors unless they are mentally handicapped can be held accountable for violent crimes. Violent crimes have serious consequences. In a violent crime a minor can be considered evil. Through violence a minor can become a menace to society because he or she can take a person’s life and there is no coming back from that. We live in a society that is civilized and if kids grow up thinking they can get away with murder then we can have chaos.
ABC reports that opponents of trying juveniles in adult courts say more needs to be done for the nation's young criminals and that the law needs to take into account their psychological development and maturity. The current system is so at odds with what the research tells us about the kids describes a deputy director and co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center. They are deciding at a point in the kid’s life when nobody knows who he'll be in 10, 15 or 20 years. It's like sentencing someone to die in prison. It is difficult making these decisions about kids under circumstances where the research doesn't support making those kinds of decisions. Prosecutors say they only consider this scenario if the juvenile is proven to be too dangerous for society. They do consider all the options for a juvenile court if they don't have a record. Based on the nature of the ...
Running head: Hate Crimes
1
Hate Crimes
2
My tutorial comes with a Certificate, which is a report attached to each tutorial, and shows that my work is plagiarism free. I usually use Turnitin checker software and Dustball plagiarism checker software to prepare this certificate. According to most Plagiarism checker systems, an original paper is a paper with similarity amount range between 10% to 20 % OR (( 80-90% unique contents)).
In many cities throughout the United States, the prevalence of hate crimes has increased. You have been asked to provide your insight into this and recommend ways to decrease the occurrence of these types of crimes.
Research the topic of hate crimes and address the following:
· Create a profile of the typical individual who commits hate crimes.
· Who are some targets and/or victims of hate crimes?
· What are some of the causes and effects of these crimes?
· What actions can be taken to minimize the occurrence of hate crimes?
Hate Crimes
Student Name
University Name
Hate Crimes
Hate Crimes care awful and nevertheless they happen each day. The thought that a hate crimes will happen anytime anyplace isn't one thing that crosses everyone’s mind daily. among this essay we'll cowl the everyday individual United Nations agency commits hate crimes, United Nations agency the targets or victims of hate crimes ar, what the causes and effects of hate crimes ar, and what actions are often taken to reduce the number and prevalence of hate crimes. sadly hate crimes are a vicinity of the u. s., before the u. s. being named. they're a vicinity of our history as Americans, tho' it's not sensible history, it's still there. “A hate crime is typically outlined by state law jointly that involves threats, harassment, or physical hurt and is driven by prejudice against someone's race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation or physical or mental incapacity.” (USLegal, 2011)
According to statistics an outsized majority of hate crime offenders ar white, young adult, males. this is often solely statistically speaking tho', hates crime offenders are often anyone, anytime, anywhere. tho' this looks a shivery thought that's however things ar. there's no excellent profile for a personal that
commits hate crimes, any person has the potential to try and do it, and it simply depends on the individual and whether or not they place their thoughts into motion. It are often as easy as somebody harassing or stepping into a fight with another person as a result of they are doing not believe their faith, or it are often as horrific as someone murdering somebody due to their physiological property or race.
The targets of hate crimes are often anyone. people that commit hate crimes, commit them as a result of they are doing not sort of a person’s faith, race, physiological property preference, ethnicity, or maybe physical or mental incapacity. A majority of your time we tend to hear cases on the news that talk o.
Minority Youth and Crime Minority Youth in CourtYouth in genera.docxannandleola
Minority Youth and Crime: Minority Youth in Court
Youth in general, and young minority males in particular, often are demonized by legislators, the media, scholars, and the public at large. These attacks reinforce stereotypes and place a particularly heavy burden on young Black and Latino males.
LINDA S. BERES AND THOMAS D. GRIFFITH, “DEMONIZING YOUTH”1
In June 2001 Lionel Tate, an African American boy who was 12 years old when he killed a 6-year-old family friend while demonstrating a wrestling move he had seen on television, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Tate, who claimed that the death was an accident, was tried as an adult in Broward County, Florida; he was convicted of first degree murder. One month later, Nathaniel Brazill, a 14-year-old African American, was sentenced by a Florida judge to 28 years in prison without the possibility of parole. Brazill was 13 years old when he shot and killed Barry Grunow, a popular 30-year-old seventh grade teacher at a middle school in Lake Worth, Florida. Although Brazill did not deny that he fired the shot that killed his teacher, he claimed that he had only meant to scare Grunow and that the shooting was an accident. Like Tate, Brazill was tried as an adult; he was convicted of second degree murder.
These two cases raised a storm of controversy regarding the prosecution of children as adults. Those on one side argue that children who commit adult crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults; they should be prosecuted as adults and sentenced to adult correctional institutions. As Marc Shiner, the prosecutor in Brazill’s case, put it, “This was a heinous crime committed by a young man with a difficult personality who should be behind bars. Let us not forget a man’s life has been taken away.”2 Those on the other side contend that prosecuting children as adults is “unwarranted and misguided.” They assert that children who commit crimes of violence usually suffer from severe mental and emotional problems and that locking kids up in adult jails does not deter crime or rehabilitate juvenile offenders. Although they acknowledge that juvenile offenders should be punished for their actions, they claim that incarcerating them in adult prisons for the rest of their lives “is an outrage.”3 According to Vincent Schiraldi, president of the Justice Policy Institute, “In adult prisons, Brazill will never receive the treatment he needs to reform himself. Instead, he will spend his time trying to avoid being beaten, assaulted, or raped in a world where adults prey on, rather than protect, the young.”4
Nathaniel Brazill is still incarcerated in the Brevard Correctional Institution. Assuming that none of his pending appeals are successful, he will not be released until 2028, when he will be 41 years old.5 Lionel Tate’s conviction, on the other hand, was overturned by a Florida appellate court in 2003. The court ruled that Tate should be retried because his competency to stan ...
Deborah LaBelle - A Notable Professional From Michigan.pdfDeborah LaBelle
Deborah LaBelle has represented clients before the United States Supreme Court and in international forums with an integrated model for reform utilizing concurrent litigation, documentation, and advocacy strategies. Find out more about her at her official site http://www.deborahlabelle.com/
Running head CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY .docxsusanschei
Running head: CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY
1
CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY 9
Criminals and Society
11/23/2016
Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults that is the question. When courts take away trial and sentencing options, it is not possible to provide justice in every case. The great number of juvenile crimes, from petty vandalism to violent homicide, are handled by the juvenile justice system and not adult courts. The separation of the two systems is a recognition of the differences between juveniles and adults and offers juveniles greater opportunities for forgiveness and redemption. Juvenile courts exist mainly to rehabilitate youth who’ve done wrong. But that’s not possible or appropriate in every case. Some juveniles commit crimes so horrific in their depravity that justice could not be carried out in the juvenile system. Other crimes, and their perpetrators, show maturity that should be dealt with adult punishment. An example spanning both classes was a 16-year-old Sarah Johnson’s plot to murder her parents and pin the crime on an intruder. Her case was transferred to adult court, and Johnson was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. as reported by NYTIMES (2016).
Minors who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults but incarcerated in specific prisons. The reason is that regular prisons would negatively influence minors and may make them even more violent. These minors unless they are mentally handicapped can be held accountable for violent crimes. Violent crimes have serious consequences. In a violent crime a minor can be considered evil. Through violence a minor can become a menace to society because he or she can take a person’s life and there is no coming back from that. We live in a society that is civilized and if kids grow up thinking they can get away with murder then we can have chaos.
ABC reports that opponents of trying juveniles in adult courts say more needs to be done for the nation's young criminals and that the law needs to take into account their psychological development and maturity. The current system is so at odds with what the research tells us about the kids describes a deputy director and co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center. They are deciding at a point in the kid’s life when nobody knows who he'll be in 10, 15 or 20 years. It's like sentencing someone to die in prison. It is difficult making these decisions about kids under circumstances where the research doesn't support making those kinds of decisions. Prosecutors say they only consider this scenario if the juvenile is proven to be too dangerous for society. They do consider all the options for a juvenile court if they don't have a record. Based on the nature of the ...
Running head: Hate Crimes
1
Hate Crimes
2
My tutorial comes with a Certificate, which is a report attached to each tutorial, and shows that my work is plagiarism free. I usually use Turnitin checker software and Dustball plagiarism checker software to prepare this certificate. According to most Plagiarism checker systems, an original paper is a paper with similarity amount range between 10% to 20 % OR (( 80-90% unique contents)).
In many cities throughout the United States, the prevalence of hate crimes has increased. You have been asked to provide your insight into this and recommend ways to decrease the occurrence of these types of crimes.
Research the topic of hate crimes and address the following:
· Create a profile of the typical individual who commits hate crimes.
· Who are some targets and/or victims of hate crimes?
· What are some of the causes and effects of these crimes?
· What actions can be taken to minimize the occurrence of hate crimes?
Hate Crimes
Student Name
University Name
Hate Crimes
Hate Crimes care awful and nevertheless they happen each day. The thought that a hate crimes will happen anytime anyplace isn't one thing that crosses everyone’s mind daily. among this essay we'll cowl the everyday individual United Nations agency commits hate crimes, United Nations agency the targets or victims of hate crimes ar, what the causes and effects of hate crimes ar, and what actions are often taken to reduce the number and prevalence of hate crimes. sadly hate crimes are a vicinity of the u. s., before the u. s. being named. they're a vicinity of our history as Americans, tho' it's not sensible history, it's still there. “A hate crime is typically outlined by state law jointly that involves threats, harassment, or physical hurt and is driven by prejudice against someone's race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation or physical or mental incapacity.” (USLegal, 2011)
According to statistics an outsized majority of hate crime offenders ar white, young adult, males. this is often solely statistically speaking tho', hates crime offenders are often anyone, anytime, anywhere. tho' this looks a shivery thought that's however things ar. there's no excellent profile for a personal that
commits hate crimes, any person has the potential to try and do it, and it simply depends on the individual and whether or not they place their thoughts into motion. It are often as easy as somebody harassing or stepping into a fight with another person as a result of they are doing not believe their faith, or it are often as horrific as someone murdering somebody due to their physiological property or race.
The targets of hate crimes are often anyone. people that commit hate crimes, commit them as a result of they are doing not sort of a person’s faith, race, physiological property preference, ethnicity, or maybe physical or mental incapacity. A majority of your time we tend to hear cases on the news that talk o.
1. Office of Victims Advocacy
Victims' Rights Day Commemoration
April 22 | 12:00pm-1pm | Capitol Rotunda
Special Guest Speaker: Mr. John W. Gillis was born in Lexington, KY where he received his
secondary education and graduated from Douglas High School. He received his Bachelor’s Degree
at California State University, Los Angeles, and a Master’s Degree from the University of Southern
California, Los Angeles.
Mr. Gillis has a long and distinguished career in criminal justice, including victim issues. He is the
former National Director, Office for Victims of Crime, U. S. Department of Justice. He served with the
Los Angeles Police Department for more than twenty-six years. Following the 1979 murder of his
daughter Louarna, he became a founding member of Justice for Homicide Victims (JHV) and the
Coalition of Victims Equal Rights, statewide organizations that worked on behalf of the rights of
victims and their families. He is also the co-founder of Victims and Friends United, an active member
of Memory of Victims Everywhere, and Parents of Murdered Children (POMC). He is currently a
board member of the National Crime Victim Law Institute (NCVLI) headquartered in Portland,
Oregon.
National Crime Victims' Rights The Office of Victims Advocacy will be celebrating
National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, "Engaging Communities — Empowering Victims" on a Day
of Celebration, Wednesday, April 22 from Noon-1:00pm in the Capitol Rotunda, Frankfort.