The document presents assignment questions for AC 465 at Kaplan University, focusing on fraud definition, forensic accountant services in marital disputes, and the fraud triangle theory. It includes a short case study about Sue Evans and prompts for ethical decision-making regarding police involvement and hiring forensic accountants. Overall, it serves as an educational guideline for understanding and analyzing fraud and forensic accounting.

1. Kalpan university AC 465 Unit 1
Assignment
Questions NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ac-
465-kaplan-u.n.iversity/ac-465-unit-1-
assignment-questions-new
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com.
Part 1:
1-1: Define fraud and identify a potentially
fraudulent situation.
1-3: Describe the services that a forensic
accountant might provide related to a
marital dispute.
1-5: Explain the theory of the fraud
triangle. 1-8: Give examples of non-fraud
forensic and litigation advisory
engagements. 1-10: Explain fraud
examination methodology.
Part 2:

2. Short Case: Respond to the questions
asked at the conclusion of the following
case:
What should Sue Evans do? Should she
contact the police? Should she hire an
external forensic accountant? How might a
forensic accountant help in this case?
Specifically, what could the forensic
accountant do that Sue’s internal auditors
could not do?