The attached CIP ranking process was a culmination of various process and strategies combined to arrive at this document. It has been successfully implemented in multiple programs and has been freely shared for public use by cities CIP staff.
Jim Proce ICMA-CM - Cartegraph - 2020 Vortex of StupidityJim Proce
Jim Proce, a credentialed ICMA City Manager with a background in Public Works and Engineering, serves up a reality check with this no nonsense approach to local government, with the idea of no excuses and challenging participants to ask themselves questions and to do something about the things that make you crazy.
As the City of Anna Texas endures explosive growth a special time occurred several hot days in the summer of 2019, where a group of neighbors got together and with a little help from our friends from Play By Design a small miracle occurred.
#AnnaTexasTheNextBigThinginNTX
Staff presented this material to the Anna City Council on the many challenges and concerns for FY19/20, to get feedback and consensus to prepare the annual budget. Later in the year the actual budget will be presented for review, approval and implementation.
City Council Candidate Orientation 2019 - Anna TexasJim Proce
When great folks decide to run for City Council to represent their neighbors, City staff wants these folks to be well informed so that they represent well in the community, win or lose, a better educated candidate can be an asset to the community. They can become great community leaders, volunteers, and board members and we want to help them to the mutual success of out community.
2019 NCTCOG Public Works Roundup - Cities of Fate and AnnaJim Proce
City Managers Michael Kovacs (Fate TX) and Jim Proce (Anna TX) present aggressive techniques on road management, infrastructure management, inspired by Strongtowns principles, that will challenge the status quo.
2019 NCTCOG Public Works Roundup - APWA 7 Habits of Dysfunctional Leaders n...Jim Proce
Brief overview of the APWA Habits of Dysfunctional Leaders program built by the APWA Leadership and Management Committee, based on the articles public in the December 2018 APWA Reporter magazine.
Jim Proce May 2019 APWA Reporter - Smart MetersJim Proce
Looking to implement smart meter technology as a cost containment issue and innovation in your city? This article explores the pitfalls and challenges you can expect to encounter and how to navigate them. The same strategies can apply to other technology implementations so check it out and let me know what you think!
APWA Reporter December 2018 - The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional LeadersJim Proce
The APWA Leadership and Management Committee produced a series of articles on The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional Leaders. All 7 articles are contained herein and have been published in an upcoming video.
Jim Proce ICMA-CM - Cartegraph - 2020 Vortex of StupidityJim Proce
Jim Proce, a credentialed ICMA City Manager with a background in Public Works and Engineering, serves up a reality check with this no nonsense approach to local government, with the idea of no excuses and challenging participants to ask themselves questions and to do something about the things that make you crazy.
As the City of Anna Texas endures explosive growth a special time occurred several hot days in the summer of 2019, where a group of neighbors got together and with a little help from our friends from Play By Design a small miracle occurred.
#AnnaTexasTheNextBigThinginNTX
Staff presented this material to the Anna City Council on the many challenges and concerns for FY19/20, to get feedback and consensus to prepare the annual budget. Later in the year the actual budget will be presented for review, approval and implementation.
City Council Candidate Orientation 2019 - Anna TexasJim Proce
When great folks decide to run for City Council to represent their neighbors, City staff wants these folks to be well informed so that they represent well in the community, win or lose, a better educated candidate can be an asset to the community. They can become great community leaders, volunteers, and board members and we want to help them to the mutual success of out community.
2019 NCTCOG Public Works Roundup - Cities of Fate and AnnaJim Proce
City Managers Michael Kovacs (Fate TX) and Jim Proce (Anna TX) present aggressive techniques on road management, infrastructure management, inspired by Strongtowns principles, that will challenge the status quo.
2019 NCTCOG Public Works Roundup - APWA 7 Habits of Dysfunctional Leaders n...Jim Proce
Brief overview of the APWA Habits of Dysfunctional Leaders program built by the APWA Leadership and Management Committee, based on the articles public in the December 2018 APWA Reporter magazine.
Jim Proce May 2019 APWA Reporter - Smart MetersJim Proce
Looking to implement smart meter technology as a cost containment issue and innovation in your city? This article explores the pitfalls and challenges you can expect to encounter and how to navigate them. The same strategies can apply to other technology implementations so check it out and let me know what you think!
APWA Reporter December 2018 - The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional LeadersJim Proce
The APWA Leadership and Management Committee produced a series of articles on The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional Leaders. All 7 articles are contained herein and have been published in an upcoming video.
Jim Proce 2018 December - Habit #3 Not Doing What You Know You Should Be DoingJim Proce
The APWA Leadership & Management Committee produced a series of articles for the December 2018 Reporter, on what they determined to be "The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional Leaders. Jim Proce produced Habit #3 which is highlighted here.
Jim Proce 2018 December - There's a Pilot at the Point!Jim Proce
This article is a lesson in servant leadership as Jim discusses, Trent Vandagriff, Public Works Director for the City of Pilot Point Texas. Trent epitomizes the elements of servant leadership as illustrated in the issue of "Leading from the Front Lines" the APWA column.
Jim Proce - Setting the Table for SuccessJim Proce
In this version of the column, "Leading from the Front Lines" Jim talks about the attributes of leaders by discussing the APWA Leadership and Management committee and past graduates of the Emerging Leaders Academy.
APWA PWX Innovations - How Did They Do That?Jim Proce
The APWA Reporter Series, “How Did They Do That?” comes to life in this fast-paced presentation format where members of the Leadership and Management Committee and other authors of the series, discuss their projects and innovative techniques they have employed in their agencies.
Some of the discussion points may be from past articles, as well as exploring the common philosophies that drive, sustain, and but with this group we guarantee there will be some surprises and ideas you will be able to take home and easily replicate in your agency.
Speakers will tell their stories by framing the problem, sharing the inspiration and explaining the solutions for each project, innovation and topic, while exploring the necessity to drive innovation in organizations.
The group will explore the common drivers of innovation, identifying and addressing the obstacles, fostering the cultural influences and answering the how to sell, sustain, and excite innovative culture.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions, & Trust (Presentation Version 2.0)Jim Proce
Based on the article of the same name, published in December of 2017, Jim Proce presents the topic at APWA 2018 PWX and TPWA 2018. Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust! This is the extended version with additional information and comments.
Jim Proce - 2014 DPW Strategic Planning DocumentJim Proce
The COR Public Works Department Strategic Plan published in 2014 provided a solid plan establishing departmental values, vision, mission, core services, action items, work plan and more for the DPW. The creation of this document was a tremendous effort put forth but the dedicated individuals of the department.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions, &Trust - 2018 PWX Presentation (vers...Jim Proce
Based on the article of the same name, published in December of 2017, Jim Proce presents the topic at APWA 2018 PWX and TPWA 2018. Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust!
Jim Proce - Finding Leadership in the Most Unexpected Places - March 2018Jim Proce
Jim Proce kicks off the first installment of the new column "Leading from the Front Lines" with Finding Leadership in the Most Unexpected Place, being the theme of the series.
Jim Proce - That Special Time of Year Take 2 - April 2014Jim Proce
Jim Proce discusses a special time and a special person, Gary Vroman, the continuing inspiration for Jim's Annual Breakfast and fund raising event. Please read and share this article in the name of Gary, rest his soul.
Jim Proce - Connecting with Your Community - July 2007Jim Proce
Originally published in the July 2007 issue of the APWA Reporter and used a a chapter of the book, Management Recipes for Success, the article serves a checklist of community outreach and communications techniques.
Jim Proce - That Special Time of Year (Take 1) National Public Works Week 4/2008Jim Proce
Jim Proce created a tradition in Palm Bay where every year during National Public Works Week the community would have the annual event on the grounds of City Hall. This well-attended event brought out countless citizens to learn about the services, the department, the staff, see equipment, participate in activities, and enjoy a free lunch while observing this great outreach event.
Jim Proce - Recognize Your Leaders - August 2016Jim Proce
With a little help from his team, Jim Proce recognizes the accomplishment and leadership of Will Plexico, Rowlett Texas Public Works. The Recognize Your Leaders series, seeks out those unsung heroes in organizations and tells their stories. As a member of the APWA Leadership and Management Committee, Jim has sought out and facilitated the monthly column, occasionally finding a great example right in his own backyard.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust - December 2017Jim Proce
Jim Proce discusses the three "must know" topics for successful organization culture and success. The article provide checklists and insight on the topic of credibility, tough questions, and trust.
Jim Proce - Question 17 Rules for Leadership - December 2015Jim Proce
Jim Proce discuses several simple rules for leadership that you can easily replicate for success in your organization. Having served in multiple capacities, Jim has used these techniques successfully in the communities he served. Question 17 was an actual response to an interview question that landed the position.
Jim Proce - June 2017 Town Hall Meeting with a Technological TwistJim Proce
In an APWA "How Did They Do That" Series, Jim Proce discusses the Telephone Town Hall Meeting process and the successful community outreach efforts being used by communities.
Jim Proce - Stormwater & Drainage Utility Fees Analysis and PresentationJim Proce
Jim Proce has worked with community to implement stormwater utility programs in Texas and Florida. This particular presentation was a briefing for the city council illustrating the financial impact analysis for the revision to the structural components of the fee basis.
Jim Proce has been collecting pictures of cool infrastructure, which is "art" in the urban settings of the cities we live in. Check out the small sample, can we decorate your city? jimproce@gmail.com
Jim Proce 2018 December - Habit #3 Not Doing What You Know You Should Be DoingJim Proce
The APWA Leadership & Management Committee produced a series of articles for the December 2018 Reporter, on what they determined to be "The 7 Habits of Highly Dysfunctional Leaders. Jim Proce produced Habit #3 which is highlighted here.
Jim Proce 2018 December - There's a Pilot at the Point!Jim Proce
This article is a lesson in servant leadership as Jim discusses, Trent Vandagriff, Public Works Director for the City of Pilot Point Texas. Trent epitomizes the elements of servant leadership as illustrated in the issue of "Leading from the Front Lines" the APWA column.
Jim Proce - Setting the Table for SuccessJim Proce
In this version of the column, "Leading from the Front Lines" Jim talks about the attributes of leaders by discussing the APWA Leadership and Management committee and past graduates of the Emerging Leaders Academy.
APWA PWX Innovations - How Did They Do That?Jim Proce
The APWA Reporter Series, “How Did They Do That?” comes to life in this fast-paced presentation format where members of the Leadership and Management Committee and other authors of the series, discuss their projects and innovative techniques they have employed in their agencies.
Some of the discussion points may be from past articles, as well as exploring the common philosophies that drive, sustain, and but with this group we guarantee there will be some surprises and ideas you will be able to take home and easily replicate in your agency.
Speakers will tell their stories by framing the problem, sharing the inspiration and explaining the solutions for each project, innovation and topic, while exploring the necessity to drive innovation in organizations.
The group will explore the common drivers of innovation, identifying and addressing the obstacles, fostering the cultural influences and answering the how to sell, sustain, and excite innovative culture.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions, & Trust (Presentation Version 2.0)Jim Proce
Based on the article of the same name, published in December of 2017, Jim Proce presents the topic at APWA 2018 PWX and TPWA 2018. Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust! This is the extended version with additional information and comments.
Jim Proce - 2014 DPW Strategic Planning DocumentJim Proce
The COR Public Works Department Strategic Plan published in 2014 provided a solid plan establishing departmental values, vision, mission, core services, action items, work plan and more for the DPW. The creation of this document was a tremendous effort put forth but the dedicated individuals of the department.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions, &Trust - 2018 PWX Presentation (vers...Jim Proce
Based on the article of the same name, published in December of 2017, Jim Proce presents the topic at APWA 2018 PWX and TPWA 2018. Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust!
Jim Proce - Finding Leadership in the Most Unexpected Places - March 2018Jim Proce
Jim Proce kicks off the first installment of the new column "Leading from the Front Lines" with Finding Leadership in the Most Unexpected Place, being the theme of the series.
Jim Proce - That Special Time of Year Take 2 - April 2014Jim Proce
Jim Proce discusses a special time and a special person, Gary Vroman, the continuing inspiration for Jim's Annual Breakfast and fund raising event. Please read and share this article in the name of Gary, rest his soul.
Jim Proce - Connecting with Your Community - July 2007Jim Proce
Originally published in the July 2007 issue of the APWA Reporter and used a a chapter of the book, Management Recipes for Success, the article serves a checklist of community outreach and communications techniques.
Jim Proce - That Special Time of Year (Take 1) National Public Works Week 4/2008Jim Proce
Jim Proce created a tradition in Palm Bay where every year during National Public Works Week the community would have the annual event on the grounds of City Hall. This well-attended event brought out countless citizens to learn about the services, the department, the staff, see equipment, participate in activities, and enjoy a free lunch while observing this great outreach event.
Jim Proce - Recognize Your Leaders - August 2016Jim Proce
With a little help from his team, Jim Proce recognizes the accomplishment and leadership of Will Plexico, Rowlett Texas Public Works. The Recognize Your Leaders series, seeks out those unsung heroes in organizations and tells their stories. As a member of the APWA Leadership and Management Committee, Jim has sought out and facilitated the monthly column, occasionally finding a great example right in his own backyard.
Jim Proce - Credibility, Hard Questions and Trust - December 2017Jim Proce
Jim Proce discusses the three "must know" topics for successful organization culture and success. The article provide checklists and insight on the topic of credibility, tough questions, and trust.
Jim Proce - Question 17 Rules for Leadership - December 2015Jim Proce
Jim Proce discuses several simple rules for leadership that you can easily replicate for success in your organization. Having served in multiple capacities, Jim has used these techniques successfully in the communities he served. Question 17 was an actual response to an interview question that landed the position.
Jim Proce - June 2017 Town Hall Meeting with a Technological TwistJim Proce
In an APWA "How Did They Do That" Series, Jim Proce discusses the Telephone Town Hall Meeting process and the successful community outreach efforts being used by communities.
Jim Proce - Stormwater & Drainage Utility Fees Analysis and PresentationJim Proce
Jim Proce has worked with community to implement stormwater utility programs in Texas and Florida. This particular presentation was a briefing for the city council illustrating the financial impact analysis for the revision to the structural components of the fee basis.
Jim Proce has been collecting pictures of cool infrastructure, which is "art" in the urban settings of the cities we live in. Check out the small sample, can we decorate your city? jimproce@gmail.com
Presentation by Rebecca Sachs and Joshua Varcie, analysts in CBO’s Health Analysis Division, at the 13th Annual Conference of the American Society of Health Economists.
Sponsor a Child for Education & Food.pptxSERUDS INDIA
Every year there are many generous people across the world who wanna help needy children with everything they need. The statistics say that donations worth education and food for more than 500 million children get every year
Donate Us:
https://serudsindia.org/sponsor-a-child-india-2021-kurnool/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donatefoodforchildren, #foodforchildren, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool
Disampaikan pada FGD Kepmen Pertahanan tentang Organisasi Profesi JF Analis Pertahanan Negara
Jakarta, 20 Juni 2024
Dr. Tri Widodo W. Utomo, SH. MA.
Deputi Bidang Kajian Kebijakan dan Inovasi Administrasi Negara LAN RI
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
1. Jim Proce, ICMA-CM, PWLF, MBA
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
RANKING SYSTEM
The Community Investment Program (CIP) involves identification, management, and implementation of
CIP projects. The process includes input from City staff, citizens, the CIP citizen committee, and City
Council. Recognition of the community needs and balancing the infrastructure demands with the funding
available, is the goal of the CIP. This includes a balance of addressing general City needs which include:
• existing infrastructure needs,
• planning for future growth, and
• addressing quality of life wants and needs.
The CIP process is only a tool to assist the City with implementing capital improvements. The future
programs will incorporate changes in projects, community needs, funding, in addition to changes in the
process to continually improve this dynamic tool.
Evaluation Process
The evaluation process provides an objective way to compare cross-departmental projects that compete
for the same funding. The subjectivity of comparing projects is reduced and more reliance is placed on
the criteria created by this process.
The project evaluation starts with the reviewing evaluation criteria derived from community responses,
City staff knowledge of citizen concerns, and City Council areas of emphasis.
CIP projects, including streets, drainage, public safety, fire, and parks can be ranked based on the
selected criteria. In order to maintain consistency in how the projects are to be evaluated, the Ranking
System is designed to assist with the scoring and interpretation of the criteria.
The evaluation method indicates CIP priorities based on the evaluation criteria and the resulting scoring.
Project Prioritization
The Community Investment Program is based on the process developed and implemented as described
above, represent balanced community and infrastructure needs of the City. The projects strategies
include balancing existing infrastructure needs, planning for community growth and capacity needs, and
quality of life initiatives, with the intent of providing project to deliver balanced value to all citizens of
Rowlett.
The CIP process is a tool to assist with determining CIP projects for the upcoming years; however, it is
only a tool to help manage the needs of the community. It is consistent with other cities’ successful CIP
implementation, that this tool be used in conjunction with oversight and support from the City Council.
The project database, evaluation criteria, prioritizations, and project communication will continue to evolve
with the growth of the community. A successful CIP includes a dynamic process that helps manage and
implement growth in a changing environment with the community’s needs at the forefront.
2. jimproce@gmail.com 2 | P a g e
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
A. DEFINITION
A Community Investment Program (CIP) is a multi-year plan outlining the goals and
objectives regarding public infrastructure and facilities for the City. This plan includes the
development, modernization, or replacement of physical infrastructure facilities. For a
project to be defined as a capital project it should meet the following criteria:
• exceed the designated dollar amount per financial policy ($25,000),
• be a nonrecurring expense,
• provide public benefit equal to or exceeding the life of the bonds and
• be an addition to the City’s fixed assets.
Examples of capital improvement projects are roads, alleys, utilities, drainage infrastructure,
parks, municipal buildings, certain technology, and other municipal facilities.
B. PROGRAM GOAL
The program goal derived from the development of a CIP is a plan that outlines the projected
infrastructure improvement needs of the city to assist in the planning and budgeting process.
This plan will include a summary of the improvements, an estimated cost, a schedule for the
improvements, operational and implementation financial impacts, and the source of funding
for the project. The CIP will prioritize the identified projects into yearly plans based on the
strategic categories that address existing infrastructure, planning for growth/capacity, and
quality of life projects. The items provided for in the bond election are a commitment to the
community.
C. PRIORITIZATION
The prioritization of the eligible projects is done by a CIP ranking system. Each potential
project must first be classified as a CIP project according to the definition above. If the above
criteria are met, the project will be given a ranking producing a CIP score for the project.
The components and scoring scale that make up the project ranking matrix are attached
herein.
D. PROJECT TYPES
After the overall CIP score is assigned to each project the projects will be re-aligned based
on the project type. These types may include transportation, public safety, drainage,
facilities, parks, and technology.
3. jimproce@gmail.com 3 | P a g e
E. FUNDING
If approved by the voters on election day, the City will issue general obligation bonds,
revenue bonds, certificates of obligation, or the appropriate financial instrument issued in
the amounts designated per the referenda, council action, and financial spending schedules
for the slate of designated projects.
F. SCHEDULING OF PROJECTS
Project schedules will be developed based on the available funding and project ranking. The
schedules will determine where each project fits in the plan. This will be based on the priority
of the project, funding availability, how it correlates with other CIP projects, and opportunities
to leverage other funds or grants. In any event, the City Council will retain full discretion to
determine the final priorities and funding of any projects.
G. PRODUCTION OF CIP PLAN
The final proposed CIP document will be produced based on the evaluation of the CIP score,
project type, funding, and schedule. These items will be summarized in a project summary
sheet. The City Council will have approval authority for the final CIP document. The CIP will
be re-evaluated at least annually to align growth, needs, and budgeting. The bonded
projects are a component of the overall CIP and are committed by the bond covenants which
must be followed by law.
4. jimproce@gmail.com 4 | P a g e
CIP RANKING CRITERIA
1) Transportation and Circulation – Principle: Connect people to one another and in
community; Provide transportation options.
An excellent transportation system provides an efficient and effective balance between access and mobility.
Changing the appearance of City streets is an example of a project that does not directly affect transportation and
circulation. The score could be based on answers to the following example questions:
A. Does the project incorporate access management?
B. Will the project improve the public transportation system (mass transit)?
C. Is the project part of the master thoroughfare plan?
D. Does the project improve traffic safety?
E. Does the project improve the level of service (maintenance)?
F. Does the project align with the City comprehensive plan?
G. Will the project improve bicyclist and pedestrian access and mobility?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project does not
affect the access or
mobility for citizens.
↔
The project will improve
access but not the
mobility of the citizens.
↔
The project greatly
impacts the access and
mobility for citizens.
2) Public Safety – Principle: Provide neighborhoods that are attractive centers of
community; Maintain excellent municipal facilities and services.
Health/public safety includes fire service, police service, safe roads, safe drinking water, fire flow demand,
sanitary sewer systems and flood control. A fire station or police station would directly impact the citizens,
scoring high in this category. New softball fields may not directly affect the health/public safety of the citizens,
therefore scoring low. The score could be based on answers to the following example questions:
A. How does the proposed project directly impact the health/public safety of citizens?
B. On what scale does this project indirectly affect the health/public safety of the community?
C. Does the failure to do the project present a risk to personal and/or physical property?
D. Does the failure to do the project present a risk to lives?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project does not
impact the
health/public safety of
the citizens.
↔
The project is divided
between the impacts it
has on the citizens
regarding health/public
safety.
↔
The project directly
impacts the
health/public safety of
the citizens
5. jimproce@gmail.com Page | 5
3) Existing Infrastructure – Principle: Maintain excellent municipal facilities and services.
This term defines items relating to infrastructure needs for the City. Items such as waterlines, sewer lines,
wastewater treatment, streets, buildings, facilities, stormwater, and drainage. The score could be based on
answers to the following example questions:
A. Does the project provide additional capacity or upgrade an existing system?
B. Is the facility exceeding its useful life?
C. What is the degree of aging of the existing facility?
D. Do the resources spent on maintenance justify replacement?
E. Is the system outdated?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The level of need to
the system is low.
↔
The project is divided
between the levels of
need the project provides.
↔
The level of need is
high; it has exceeded
its useful life.
4) Revitalization and Balanced Growth – Principle: Promote balanced growth; Provide
neighborhoods that are attractive centers of community; Reinvigorate the specific area
plans; Cultivate an environment friendly to business, medical and educational
institutions; Maintain and enhance strong community and regional partnerships.
Growth and revitalization relates to things the city can do to attract developers, businesses and corporations to
the City. Providing the needed infrastructure to continue redevelopment of downtown would score high in this
category. Reconstructing a storm drain line through a residential neighborhood would score low in the growth
and economic development category. The score could be based on answers to the following example questions:
A. Does the project have the potential to promote growth and revitalization in priority areas as
identified in strategic planning documents?
B. Will the project attract retail and/or economic development?
C. Will the project revitalize a historic or cultural area of resources?
D. Will the project attract new residents and tourism to the City?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project will not aid
in revitalization and
balanced growth.
↔
An equal portion of the
project will promote
revitalization as well as
have some impact on
balanced growth.
↔
The project will
revitalize an area of the
City and encourage
future balanced growth.
6. jimproce@gmail.com 6 | P a g e
5) Quality of Life – Principle: Connect people to one another and in community;
Provide neighborhoods that are attractive centers of community; Protect and
enhance open spaces, parks and trees in a connected network for recreation and a
healthy environment; Preserve, enhance and communicate the City’s historic
heritage.
Quality of life is a characteristic that makes the city a favorable place to live. A lakeside park with amenities
to satisfy all citizens would greatly impact the quality of life. A city maintenance building is an example of a
project that does not directly affect the citizen’s quality of life (but certainly could). The score could be based
on answers to the following example question:
A. Does the project enhance the quality of life of the citizens?
B. Does the project target the quality of life for all citizens or does it target only the
specific project area?
C. Does the project improve the appearance and image of the City?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project does not
affect the quality of life
for citizens.
↔
A portion of the project
will impact the quality of
life for the citizens.
↔
The project greatly
impacts the quality of
life for citizens.
6) Regulatory Compliance – This criterion includes regulatory mandates such as sewer line capacity,
fire flow/pressure demands, and stormwater/creek flooding problems. These mandates could come from
agencies such as EPA, TCEQ, ADA/TDLR, as well as address the ISO rating. The score could be based
on answers to the following example questions:
A. The project addresses an existing or future mandate?
B. Will the future project impact foreseeable regulatory issues?
C. Does the project promote long-term regulatory compliance?
D. Does this project satisfy a Federal Mandate?
E. Does this project satisfy a State Mandate?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project is not
justified by regulatory
compliance
↔
The project addresses
future or foreseeable
regulations.
↔
The project will satisfy
current or scheduled
regulatorycompliance.
7. jimproce@gmail.com 7 | P a g e
7) External Funding – Capital improvement projects can be funded through sources other than the City
funds. Developer funding, grants through various agencies and donations can all be sources of external
funding for a project. The percentage of total cost funded by an outside source will determine the score in
this category.
Scoring Scale:
8) Impact on Operational Budget – Some projects may affect the operating budget for the next few
years or for the life of the facility. A fire station will need to be staffed and supplied, therefore having an
impact on the operational budget for the life of the facility. Replacing a waterline will not require significant
resources from the operational budget. The score could be based on answers to the following example
questions:
A. Will the new facility require additional personnel to operate?
B. Will the new facility require significant annual maintenance?
C. Have the implementation costs been considered? (construction management)
D. Will the new facility require additional equipment not included in the project budget?
E. Will the new facility reduce time and resources of city staff maintaining current
outdated systems? This would free up staff and resources, having a positive effect on
the operational budget.
F. Will the efficiency of the project save money and is there a revenue opportunity?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project will require
additional money to
operate.
↔
The project will not affect
the operating budget. ↔
The project will have
significant savings in
time and materials
because of efficiency.
0 2 4 6 8 10
0%
External
Funding
1%-20%
External Funding
21%-40%
External Funding
41%-60%
External Funding
61%-80%
External Funding
81%-100%
External Funding
8. jimproce@gmail.com 8 | P a g e
9) Timing/Location – The timing and location of the project is an important piece of a project. If the project
is not needed for many years it would score low in this category. If the project is close in proximity to many
other projects and/or if a project may need to be completed before another one can be started it would score
high in this category. The score could be based on answers to the following example questions:
A. When is the project needed?
B. Do other projects require this one to be completed first?
C. Does this project require others to be completed first?
D. Can this project be done in conjunction with other projects? (ex.
waterline/sanitary sewer/paving improvements all within one street)
E. Will it be more economical to build multiple projects together (reduced construction costs)?
F. Will it help in reducing overall neighborhood disruptions year after year?
G. Does the project have a high degree of readiness to move the project towards completion?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project does not
have a critical
timing/location
component.
↔
The project has one
timing/location factor
critical to it.
↔
Both timing and location
are critical components
of the project.
10)Special Considerations – The public perception, community value and political will is an important piece
of a project. If the project is does not have public interest, it would score low in this category. If the project has
public interest, community value, and political will, it would score high in this category. The score could be based
on answers to the following example questions:
A. Is the project supported by the public will or interest?
B. Is the project supported by elected officials, City Council, Boards and Commissions?
C. Does the project serve the will of the citizens?
Scoring Scale:
1 3 5 7 10
The project does not
have any community
interest or political
implications.
↔
The project has
some community
interest.
↔
The project is highly
charged, has public
interest, and community
value.
9. jimproce@gmail.com 9 | P a g e
CIP SCORING MATRIX
Project
Program
Name
Member
1
Score
Member
2
Score
Member
3
Score
Member
4
Score
Member
5
Score
Member
6
Score
Member
7
Score
Totals-
Team
Average
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Add rows
as needed