Next-Gen IT 2.0 Consulting leverages proprietary CAPstone Strategy to achieve 2x Innovation, 4x Velocity, 10x ROI.

1. IT 2.0 Transformation™ 101
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 1
The “IT 2.0” Remedy
From 29% success
to 90% Success!

2. What is “IT 1.0”?
(THE PROBLEM: 29% success, $3T Losses)
• Project Success (“modern resolution”): On-Time, On-Budget with Stakeholder Satisfaction
• New CHAOS database of project statistics: Outcomes of 50,000 projects worldwide since 2002.
(60% from USA, 25% from Europe, and 15% All Other Countries)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 2
HOW DO YOUR PROJECTS COMPARE?
2http://www.cio.com/article/2385984/project-management/why-your-next-big-it-project-is-doomed.html
1http://www.infoq.com/articles/standish-chaos-2015
1
IT Waste Worldwide
(approx. 3.9% GDP):
Corporate annual IT
losses of $3 Trillion 2

3. “IT 1.0” Juggernaut
(THE PAIN: Which do you experience?)
• “IT 1.0” SYMPTOMS
– Do you wonder why so many IT projects fail to deliver ROI?
– Do your IT costs seem to grow exponentially over time?
– Is IT delivery consistently a bottleneck?
• “IT 1.0” INFIRMITY
– IT is a Cost-Centre
– Digital Transformation Stuck in Analog…
– IT Systems Suffering Performance & Reliability Issues…
– Biz Views IT as Funnel Catcher, not Indispensable Partner…
– IT Security Initiatives Neutralized By Growing Complexity…
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 3

4. What is “IT 2.0”?
(THE REMEDY: Win Faster with 90% Success!)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 4
IT 1.0: “Fail Fast/Often”
From 29% success.
(Biz vs IT Misalignment)
IT 2.0: “Win Faster”
To 90% Success!
(Biz & IT Alignment)

5. Why “IT 2.0”?
(THE GAIN: 2x Innovation, 4x Velocity, 10x ROI)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 5

6. “IT 2.0” Antidotes (Not Shown)
(THE HOW: Remediates 24+ IT 1.0 anti-patterns)
Enterprise – EA 2.0 (Tactical Biz-IT Alignment vs Strategic Biz-IT Alignment)Enterprise – EA 2.0
IT – IT 2.0 (Object-Oriented vs Architecture Oriented)
Business – BA 2.0 (Operations/Tactics/OLA/Mgmt/Expense Oriented vs Innovation/Strategic/SLA/Leadership/Investment Oriented)
IT – IT 2.0
Business – BA 2.0
IT ANALYSIS/DESIGN
(ARCHITECTURE &
FINANCE)
Unimodal Ops/DevOps vs
Multimodal Inno Labs Aware
(SOS – Grtnr,TDS,Lockhd)
Projects Pushed vs
Programs Pulled
(CREM - Lean)
Ad-Hoc Mgmt Sponsor vs
Strategic Ldrshp Sponsor
(SLA – Ldrshp Simonton)
Pseudo Engineer vs
EntreLead Chief Arch/Eng
(SPS – EntreLdrshp, TDS)
Object Oriented vs
Architecture Oriented
(AOA/D – Sys. Thinking)
Biz Req Elictatn/Tracbilty vs
Biz Plan/Drivers Linkage
(SOBA – Biz Plan)
Waterfall/Agile Process vs
Split-Spiral Practice
(S3AP – Spiral Risk Mgmt)
Internal Arch vs
External Arch
(ToD – Aerodyn Sys Eng)
Func. Tradeoffs vs
Non-Func Tradeoffs
(NFTA - QoD)
First Concept Eng vs
Super Concept Arch
(LAS – AOA)
Critical-Path vs
Critical-Loop/Chain
(CLPM – CCPM, Deming)
Point-based Services vs
Set-based CapabilityTradeoffs
(CTC - TDS/Lean, ITSI)
SME (Cust/Usr) Rep vs
SME (Cust/Usr) Partnering
(SPS – LSS/VoC, Agile)
1-Stage RFI/Q/P vs
2-Stage Design + Impl
(RF2P - AOA)
IT 1.0 Anti-patterns vs
IT 2.0 Antidotes
(Mitigation Strategy)
Comp. Adv (Ext) Srcing vs
Core Comptncy (Int) Srcing
(S2 – Neo/GBS, BPO)
Offshoring/Outsourcing vs
SmartShoring/Sourcing
(S2)
IT-based PMO/VMO-CIO vs
GRC-based EMO-CINO/CTIO
(SOS – PMI, Neo/GBS)
ORG SHAPING
(CORE ORG DYNAMICS)
SOURCING (CONSULTING)
TEAM SHAPING
(CORE TEAM DYNAMICS)
Functional Mgmt (Adm) vs
Process Leadership (Tech)
(SOS – BPM, DFSS, LSS)
Dissimilar Culture Matrix vs
Similar Culture Program
(SOS - SOURCING)
Lang-based Use-Cases vs
Graphics-based Eval
(SOBA – UML)
Compliance-based PnP vs
Target-based KPIs
(SOBA - Lean Strtp AARRR)
Order-TakerScoping(Cost)vs
Financial MVPDeScoping (ROI)
(SOBA–LeanS/MVP,ToR,DCF)
Non-Technical BA vs
EntreLead BA-Arch
(SPS)
OCM vs
OCL Leader Awareness
(SLA - CQ Troutlein)
PM+BA+PseudoEng vs
EntreSpnsr+EntreLead+SME
(SPS)
ORG CHANGE
LEADERSHIP (OCL)
EXECUTION
(PORTFOLIO)
Voice of Exprt (VoE) UX/UI vs
Voice of Custmer (VoC) UX/UI
(SOBA – LSS/VoC, D-Thnk)
Low-cycles(Indiv&Team)<3vs
High-cycles(Indiv&Team)>=3+
(SPS - Tuckman, Dreyfus)
Assumed Vision/Verbal vs
Shared Vision/InfoGraphic
(SLA – OCM, Gravitation)
Expense-driven SDLC vs
Investment-driven SDLC
(S3AP – SOP 98-1 Accntg)
Struct-based Perf Mgmt vs
Knowldg-based Perf Mgmt
(SOS – TDS/Lean)
BIZ ANALYSIS/DESIGN
(ARCHITECTURE &
FINANCE)
Exprt Jdgmnt Concept vs
Weighted Eval S-Concept
(SOBA – SQFD, Dunning-K)
Ad-Hoc QoD/QA/QC vs
Design for QoD (OLA/SLA)
(SOBA – LSS/SFMEA, FTA)
Long-cycle Delivery vs
Staged Short-cycle Delivery
(CDSM – Iceberg Effect)
Staffaug/WO(T&M) vs
Consulting/SOW(CPP)
(S2)
Bottom-up 1-Stage/Pt Est vs
Top-down 2-Stage/Pt Est.
(SOBA – Opt-Bias,Dunning-K)
Object-based Diagrams vs
System-based Diagrams
(UMN – UML, OMT, Booch)
Single Modality
Anti-Pattern
PMO/VMO - CIO
Anti-Pattern
Teaming Reuse
Anti-Pattern
Administrative Mgmt
Anti-Pattern
Administrative Perf Mgmt
Anti-Pattern
Ad-Hoc Sponsor
Anti-Pattern
Blind Change Leader
Anti-Pattern
Blind Workforce
Anti-Pattern
Drum Multi-tasking
Anti-Pattern
Planning Criticality
Anti-Pattern
Microscopic Modelling
Anti-Pattern
Microscopic Thinking
Anti-Pattern
Architecture Definition
Anti-Pattern
Microscopic Tradeoffs
Anti-Pattern
Microscopic Interfaces
Anti-Pattern
Concept Singularity
Anti-Pattern
B/N/LDUF SDLC
Anti-Pattern
CapEx Accnting Design
Anti-Pattern
Estimate Singularity
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo UX/UI
Anti-Pattern
Ad-Hoc Scoping
Anti-Pattern
Ambiguous Requirements
Anti-Pattern
Blind Compliance
Anti-Pattern
Ad-Hoc QoD
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo Concept
Anti-Pattern
Req. Elicitatn/Traceabilty
Anti-Pattern
Fail-Fast/Often Delivery
Anti-Pattern
1-Stage Sourcing
Anti-Pattern
Locl Ops Commdty Srcing
Anti-Pattern
Intl Ops Commdty Srcing
Anti-Pattern
Comp Adv Sourcing
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo SME
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo Cycles
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo Team
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo Engineer
Anti-Pattern
Pseudo Architect
Anti-Pattern
IT 1.0 Anti-patterns
IT 1.0 Anti-patterns
The chart on the left lists 36 IT 1.0 anti-
patterns identified as root causes for the
dismal worldwide 29% success rate and
$3 Trillion in annual failed IT projects
over the previous 2-decades.
IT 2.0 Antidotes
36 IT 2.0 antidotes were researched,
developed, tested, and refined for over
2-decades to mitigate the root-causes of
IT 1.0 failure and are available for
purchase as IT 2.0 GoldPapers™ on an
64Gb USB 2.0 Gold Bar Drive.
IT 2.0 GoldPapers™
64Gb USB 2.0 Gold Bar Drive
Contains:
• EA 2.0 NDA
• 36 IT 2.0 Antidotes
• ROI Calculator
• Project Success Calculator
http://www.it2catalysts/contact

7. “IT 2.0” Practices
(THE MAGIC: Delivers 90% Success)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 7
Executive
Leadership
Strategic
Sponsorship
Strategic Program Shaping™ (SPS)
Servant Leadership Algorithms™ (SLA)
SDLC
Process
Scalable
Split-Spiral
Scalable Split-Spiral Architecture Practice™ (S3AP)
Theory-Of-Design Algorithms™ (TODA)
Business
Analysis
Focus on Biz Drivers
& Non-Func Req.
Statement Oriented Business Analysis™ (SOBA)
Non-Functional Tradeoff Analysis™ (NFTA)
Software
Design
Architecture
Oriented
Architecture Oriented Analysis & Design™ (AOA/D)
Lateral Architectural Simplicity™ (LAS)
IT 2.0
Best Practices
IT 2.0 Transformation™ GoldPapers
(Proprietary Methods)
Resourcing &
Procurement
Smart Sourcing, CPP, &
CTC Independents
Smart Sourcing™ (S2)
RFP 2.0 Procurement™ (RF2P)
Project
Mgmt
Critical Loop
& Critical Resource
Critical Loop Project Management™ (CLPM)
Critical Resource Enterprise Management™ (CREM)
90%
SUCCESS
RATE IT 2.0 Transformation™

8. “IT 2.0” Effectiveness
(THE MOVE: Towards Disruptive Innovation)
IT 2.0 Transformation™
Utilizes the Scalable Split-Spiral
Architecture Practice (S3AP), the only
IT Systems Development Life Cycle
(SDLC) based on 20-years of R&D to
leverage both Theory-Of-Design
algorithms (TODA) and proven
practices from both Lockheed
“SkunkWorks” and Toyota “TDS”.
Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 8

9. “IT 2.0” Comparison
(THE DIFFERENCE: From 29% to 90%)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 9
29% Biennial Average
90% Biennial Average
“Waterfall/Agile”
“IT 2.0 Transformation™”
IT 1.0 Success Rates as defined by Standish Group Biennial CHAOS Report
-Disruptive Innovation!
-Maximum Velocity!
-High-ROI Results!

10. “IT 2.0” Case Study
(THE RESULTS: Mobile Technology Startup)
• BACKGROUND
– Mobile Technology Startup in Denver, CO
• THE PROBLEM
– Strategic projects were stressed (late & over-budget)
– Customers were upset and complaining
• THE INTERVENTION
– IT 2.0 Consulting® (between 2013-2015)
• THE RESULTS
– 4 Projects Recovered
– New jobs created
– Upset customers converted to repeat business
– ROI = 1.5 to 2.1 (150% to 210%)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 10
“Implementing IT 2.0 Consulting®
was like flipping a switch…”
-Patrick B., CEO

11. Contact Us Today!
(THE SUPPORT: 90 minute response time)
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 11

12. “IT 2.0” No Risk Engagement
(THE OFFER: Value in 2-Days or Less or its Free)
• SERVICES (24-Point Assessment, Advisory, Training, Audits):
– Minimum Engagement is 3-Days of IT 2.0 Consulting® (fully refundable)
– Money Back Guarantee: Full, prompt, & courteous refund if not 100% satisfied!
• GIVING BACK:
– When you do business with IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC
10% of all proceeds donated to charity!
• CONDITIONS:
– Expires 2/28/17
– Must be a New Customer (US Corporations only)
• GETTING STARTED:
– Redeem at www.it2catalysts.com
– Click Contact
12/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 IT 2.0 Catalysts, LLC All Rights Reserved. 12
Money Back Guarantee
Full, prompt, & courteous
refund if not 100% satisfied
by end of 2nd day!
$