SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
This powerful software in my possession can be verified by any structural mechanics
expert or any visual basic computer expert. A sample of this software is shown below for
comparison with available software using approximate methods. The program was done
using Microsoft Excel and the analytical equations for reinforced concrete columns were
entered in the cells to determine the minimum yield capacity of a given circular and
rectangular section. There were hundreds of equations involved that were eventually
published years later by Universal Publishers of Boca Raton, Florida in 2004. The title of
the book is “Analytical Method in Reinforced Concrete”.
The output of this software will give the envelope of the minimum yield capacity of a
reinforced circular or rectangular column section. It tabulates the numerical values every
inch of the section as well as the standard key points and graphs the envelope where the
axial load is represented by the vertical axis and the bending moment on the horizontal
axis. The current method is in error because the correct free body diagram was not drawn
to include all variable parameters. You can easily see this fact because rotation of XYZ
axes were not done as well as the coordinates of every reinforcing bars by the current
method. The user have 3 selections available – concrete capacity, bar force capacity or
the combined yield capacity of the given reinforced concrete rectangular or circular
column section. He can print these graphs for future use or he can change the numbers as
he/she pleases.
Any structural engineer can have different factor of safety from others in his/her design
as the external load in a particular locality is plotted on this graph. The user can easily
notice that as he/she plots the external load, the column section will define itself as a
short or long column.
It is indeed inconceivable that experts will continue copying others or existing literature
in this age of electronic digital computers where basic mathematics and physics can
easily be applied to derive applicable equations in structural mechanics. Basic
mathematics include algebra, trigonometry, analytic geometry and differential and
integral calculus among others in order to derive applicable equations where verification
for authenticity by Microsoft Excel is done in no time even for hundreds of equations.
A new exact paradigm is therefore required in structural mechanics so that modelling and
interpretation of laboratory data can reconcile with the analytical equations derived by the
researcher. To continue in deliberate ignorance is not advisable since digital computers
with basic mathematics can easily expose incorrect analysis.
Instructions:
(1) Circular – You can enter any variable number in the sample boxes below as well
as follow the instructions stated herein.
(2) Rectangular – Again you may enter any number that applies to your specific
problem and follow the instructions to enter and to proceed to next.
This software was based on the analytical equations published by Universal
Publishers of Boca Raton, Florida in 2004, years after the software was created
and ignored globally by experts. Hence, an example from this software is shown
below for experts to dispute the numbers indicated as minimum yield capacity of
a given column rectangular section according to Euler’s, Hooke’s Law and
Pythagorean Theorem.
………………………………………………………………………………………………
*
Column software using the parabolic stress method and 2 pivot points. The
Microsoft Excel program was prepared by William R. Mulford of Port Washington,
New York and assisted by Ramon V. Jarquio, P.E. in entering all the hundreds of
derived equations in their respective cells. This software was registered in the
Library of Congress and Bill submitted the technical details of this software as
required by the Library of Congress.
An example of this software is shown here to show the power of this software
which was advertised in ASCE magazine 2 decades ago. All declared experts
then ignored this analytical approach and did not admit the mistake of using only
1 pivot point and the rotation of XYZ axes in a 3D structural analysis invoking the
established Euler’s, Hooke’s Law and Pythagorean Theorem. Even today
approximate methods with finite-element are being copied and implemented
globally. A new paradigm of exactitude using electronic digital computers should
be employed with basic mathematics to derive the required structural solutions in
any problem. This software for reinforced concrete sections in highway and
building column components should be utilized by all agencies.
Figure1: Minimum Yield Capacity
Table 1: Key Points of the Minimum Yield Capacity Curve
RECTANGULAR COLUMN INTERACTION CURVE { 30x20 in. WITH 18 - 1in. BARS }
DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR 1 COLUMN CAPACITY AXIS 0.588 RADIANS
C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z
Q= 67.305 817 765 -817 2878 0 3643 .000 5708 1.567
R= 36.056 2404 538 3880 2490 6284 3028 2.076 706 .233
S= 31.896 2757 470 5898 2237 8655 2707 3.197 -1439 -.532
T= 19.664 4889 60 8824 1164 13713 1224 11.201 -4997 -4.081
U= 18.877 5024 24 8664 1092 13688 1116 12.268 -4938 -4.426
V= 9.147 3657 -283 3655 283 7312 0 82611.706 -1755 -19823.852
Q=Theoretical maximum axial load
R=Full section in compression
S=Zero tension in rebar
T=Max moment capacity of section
U=Balanced loading condition
V=Beam condition
Table 2: User Input / Output Information
RECTANGULAR COLUMN INTERACTION CURVE { 30x20 in. WITH 18 - 1in. BARS }
LENGTH of RECTANGLE 30 in. BARS ALONG LENGTH 5
WIDTH of RECTANGLE 20 in. BARS ALONG WIDTH 6
CLEARANCE BAR CENTER to FACE 3.00 in. TOTAL BARS in COLUMN 18
REBAR DIAMETER 1.000 in. NUMBER of BUNDLES 0
STEEL STRENGTH 60.00 kips/sq. in. Space Between BARS, Along Length 5.000 in.
CONCRETE STRENGTH 5.00 kips/sq. in. Space Between BARS, Along Width 1.800 in.
DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR 1.00 BARS on CENTER, ALONG LENGTH 6.000 in.
% of STEEL to CONCRETE 2.36% BARS on CENTER,ALONG WIDTH 2.800 in.
RADIANS .58800 CONCRETE STRAIN .0030
MODULUS of ELASTICITY Es 29000 kips/sq. in. EQUIVALENT DIAMETER
VOLUME of CONCRETE WEIGHT of STEEL REBARS
cu. yd. per ft. of COLUMN .1542 lbs. per ft. of COLUMN 48.11
Table 3: Numerical Values of Minimum Yield Capacity
30x20 in. with 18 - 1in. BARS, DESIGN S.F.1, COLUMN CAPACITY AXIS 0.588 RADIANS
C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z=Mz / P
V= 9.147 3657 -283 3655 283 7312 0 -1755
10.000 3872 -253 4207 339 8080 85 94.819 -2004 -23.520
11.000 4103 -219 4861 410 8964 191 47.012 -2352 -12.332
12.000 4306 -186 5510 487 9817 301 32.571 -2746 -9.110
13.000 4489 -153 6133 569 10622 417 25.486 -3170 -7.606
14.000 4642 -121 6712 655 11354 534 21.281 -3574 -6.698
15.000 4772 -90 7238 742 12010 652 18.413 -3939 -6.038
16.000 4878 -60 7702 831 12581 772 16.306 -4265 -5.528
17.000 4953 -30 8102 921 13054 891 14.654 -4548 -5.105
18.000 5000 -2 8432 1012 13432 1010 13.295 -4781 -4.732
U= 18.877 5024 24 8664 1092 13688 1116 12.268 -4938 -4.426
19.000 5004 30 8692 1103 13695 1133 12.090 -4948 -4.368
T= 19.664 4889 60 8824 1164 13713 1224 11.201 -4997 -4.081
20.000 4830 76 8879 1195 13709 1270 10.791 -5014 -3.946
21.000 4648 120 8993 1287 13641 1407 9.697 -5030 -3.576
22.000 4460 163 9032 1379 13492 1542 8.751 -4995 -3.240
23.000 4265 204 8997 1471 13261 1674 7.921 -4902 -2.928
24.000 4061 243 8886 1563 12947 1805 7.172 -4755 -2.634
25.000 3860 279 8700 1655 12560 1934 6.494 -4570 -2.363
26.000 3662 315 8440 1747 12103 2061 5.871 -4301 -2.087
27.000 3472 348 8114 1837 11586 2185 5.303 -3937 -1.802
28.000 3305 377 7732 1926 11037 2303 4.793 -3499 -1.520
29.000 3144 404 7303 2011 10447 2416 4.325 -3007 -1.245
30.000 2996 429 6839 2093 9834 2522 3.899 -2481 -.984
31.000 2865 451 6349 2171 9214 2622 3.513 -1935 -.738
S= 31.896 2757 470 5898 2237 8655 2707 3.197 -1439 -.532
32.000 2747 472 5845 2245 8592 2716 3.163 -1382 -.509
33.000 2658 489 5337 2313 7995 2803 2.852 -835 -.298
34.000 2572 506 4837 2377 7409 2883 2.570 -303 -.105
35.000 2490 522 4356 2435 6845 2957 2.315 205 .069
36.000 2408 537 3904 2487 6312 3024 2.087 680 .225
R= 36.056 2404 538 3880 2490 6284 3028 2.076 706 .233
37.000 2326 551 3492 2534 5818 3084 1.886 1113 .361
38.000 2248 564 3117 2575 5364 3139 1.709 1505 .480
39.000 2173 576 2775 2612 4947 3188 1.552 1863 .584
40.000 2101 588 2463 2645 4564 3232 1.412 2189 .677
41.000 2032 599 2178 2674 4210 3273 1.286 2488 .760
42.000 1964 609 1917 2700 3880 3309 1.173 2764 .835
43.000 1898 619 1677 2723 3575 3342 1.070 3018 .903
44.000 1835 628 1457 2744 3292 3372 .976 3251 .964
45.000 1774 637 1255 2762 3029 3400 .891 3466 1.019
46.000 1716 646 1069 2778 2785 3425 .813 3663 1.070
47.000 1660 655 897 2793 2557 3448 .742 3845 1.115
48.000 1604 662 739 2806 2343 3468 .676 4017 1.158
49.000 1550 670 592 2817 2142 3487 .614 4177 1.198
50.000 1498 677 457 2827 1955 3504 .558 4324 1.234
51.000 1448 684 332 2836 1780 3519 .506 4461 1.268
52.000 1400 690 216 2844 1615 3534 .457 4588 1.298
53.000 1353 696 108 2850 1461 3547 .412 4706 1.327
Table 3 continued
C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z=Mz / P
54.000 1308 703 8 2856 1316 3559 .370 4815 1.353
55.000 1264 709 -85 2861 1180 3570 .330 4917 1.377
56.000 1222 714 -171 2865 1051 3579 .294 5011 1.400
57.000 1180 719 -251 2869 929 3588 .259 5097 1.420
58.000 1140 725 -326 2872 814 3596 .226 5177 1.440
59.000 1100 729 -395 2874 705 3604 .196 5252 1.457
60.000 1062 734 -460 2876 602 3610 .167 5321 1.474
61.000 1025 739 -520 2878 505 3616 .140 5386 1.489
62.000 990 743 -576 2879 413 3622 .114 5447 1.504
63.000 955 748 -629 2879 326 3627 .090 5503 1.517
64.000 921 752 -677 2880 244 3631 .067 5556 1.530
65.000 889 756 -723 2880 166 3635 .046 5605 1.542
66.000 857 760 -765 2879 91 3639 .025 5651 1.553
67.000 826 764 -805 2879 21 3642 .006 5694 1.563
Q= 67.305 817 765 -817 2878 0 3643 .000 5708 1.567

More Related Content

What's hot

Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross section
Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross sectionFree vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross section
Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross sectioneSAT Journals
 
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...Barhm Mohamad
 
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...Barhm Mohamad
 
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory and
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory andComparison of stress between winkler bach theory and
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory andeSAT Publishing House
 
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane load
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane loadFe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane load
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane loadeSAT Journals
 
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using software
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using softwareDynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using software
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using softwareeSAT Journals
 
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on Adams
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on AdamsMechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on Adams
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on AdamsIJRESJOURNAL
 

What's hot (8)

Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross section
Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross sectionFree vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross section
Free vibrational analysis of curved beam with uniform rectangular cross section
 
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
 
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
 
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory and
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory andComparison of stress between winkler bach theory and
Comparison of stress between winkler bach theory and
 
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane load
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane loadFe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane load
Fe investigation of semi circular curved beam subjected to out-of-plane load
 
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using software
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using softwareDynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using software
Dynamic analysis of a reinforced concrete horizontal curved beam using software
 
Ijmet 06 07_004
Ijmet 06 07_004Ijmet 06 07_004
Ijmet 06 07_004
 
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on Adams
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on AdamsMechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on Adams
Mechanism Design and Kinematics Analysis of Display Bracket Based on Adams
 

Similar to Instructions

IRJET- Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC Structures
IRJET-  	  Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC StructuresIRJET-  	  Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC Structures
IRJET- Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC StructuresIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel Vaults
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel VaultsIRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel Vaults
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel VaultsIRJET Journal
 
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...IRJET Journal
 
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...IJERA Editor
 
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...
IRJET- 	  Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...IRJET- 	  Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...IRJET Journal
 
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFD
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFDThermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFD
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFDIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral LoadingIRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral LoadingIRJET Journal
 
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mix
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mixApplication of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mix
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mixeSAT Publishing House
 
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...IRJET Journal
 
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder design
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder designPerformance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder design
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder designeSAT Publishing House
 
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machine
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing MachineFabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machine
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machinetheijes
 
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC Structures
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC StructuresStudy on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC Structures
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC StructuresIRJET Journal
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...IRJET Journal
 
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structure
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structureParametric study on slender column for flat plate structure
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structureeSAT Journals
 
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear Strength
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear StrengthParametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear Strength
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear StrengthIJERA Editor
 

Similar to Instructions (20)

IRJET- Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC Structures
IRJET-  	  Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC StructuresIRJET-  	  Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC Structures
IRJET- Study of P-Delta Effect on High Rise RCC Structures
 
3nd presentation
3nd presentation3nd presentation
3nd presentation
 
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel Vaults
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel VaultsIRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel Vaults
IRJET- A Study on the Behaviour of Double Layer Steel Braced Barrel Vaults
 
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...
Reliability Analysis of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns by FOSM and Subset...
 
FYP Structure.pdf
FYP Structure.pdfFYP Structure.pdf
FYP Structure.pdf
 
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...
Analysis of the Effect of Electric and Magnetic Loadings on the Design Parame...
 
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...
IRJET- 	  Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...IRJET- 	  Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of CFST Columns by using Form and Latin Hyperc...
 
ANALYTICAL STUDY OF TOOL WEAR IN TURNING OPERATION THROUGH S/N RATIO AND ANOVA
ANALYTICAL STUDY OF TOOL WEAR IN TURNING OPERATION THROUGH S/N RATIO AND ANOVA ANALYTICAL STUDY OF TOOL WEAR IN TURNING OPERATION THROUGH S/N RATIO AND ANOVA
ANALYTICAL STUDY OF TOOL WEAR IN TURNING OPERATION THROUGH S/N RATIO AND ANOVA
 
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFD
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFDThermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFD
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization of Solar Chimney using CFD
 
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral LoadingIRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
 
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mix
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mixApplication of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mix
Application of ibearugbulem’s model for optimizing granite concrete mix
 
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...
Seismic Analysis and Comparative Study of a Structure with Shearwall and With...
 
s1233587_Report
s1233587_Reports1233587_Report
s1233587_Report
 
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder design
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder designPerformance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder design
Performance evaluation of full adder and its impact on ripple carry adder design
 
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machine
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing MachineFabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machine
Fabrication and Analysis of Fatigue Testing Machine
 
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC Structures
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC StructuresStudy on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC Structures
Study on Effects of P-Delta Analysis on RC Structures
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
 
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structure
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structureParametric study on slender column for flat plate structure
Parametric study on slender column for flat plate structure
 
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear Strength
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear StrengthParametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear Strength
Parametric Study of Multi-Spot Welded Lap Shear Specimen for Shear Strength
 
B h curve-1
B h curve-1B h curve-1
B h curve-1
 

Instructions

  • 1. This powerful software in my possession can be verified by any structural mechanics expert or any visual basic computer expert. A sample of this software is shown below for comparison with available software using approximate methods. The program was done using Microsoft Excel and the analytical equations for reinforced concrete columns were entered in the cells to determine the minimum yield capacity of a given circular and rectangular section. There were hundreds of equations involved that were eventually published years later by Universal Publishers of Boca Raton, Florida in 2004. The title of the book is “Analytical Method in Reinforced Concrete”. The output of this software will give the envelope of the minimum yield capacity of a reinforced circular or rectangular column section. It tabulates the numerical values every inch of the section as well as the standard key points and graphs the envelope where the axial load is represented by the vertical axis and the bending moment on the horizontal axis. The current method is in error because the correct free body diagram was not drawn to include all variable parameters. You can easily see this fact because rotation of XYZ axes were not done as well as the coordinates of every reinforcing bars by the current method. The user have 3 selections available – concrete capacity, bar force capacity or the combined yield capacity of the given reinforced concrete rectangular or circular column section. He can print these graphs for future use or he can change the numbers as he/she pleases. Any structural engineer can have different factor of safety from others in his/her design as the external load in a particular locality is plotted on this graph. The user can easily notice that as he/she plots the external load, the column section will define itself as a short or long column. It is indeed inconceivable that experts will continue copying others or existing literature in this age of electronic digital computers where basic mathematics and physics can easily be applied to derive applicable equations in structural mechanics. Basic mathematics include algebra, trigonometry, analytic geometry and differential and integral calculus among others in order to derive applicable equations where verification for authenticity by Microsoft Excel is done in no time even for hundreds of equations. A new exact paradigm is therefore required in structural mechanics so that modelling and interpretation of laboratory data can reconcile with the analytical equations derived by the researcher. To continue in deliberate ignorance is not advisable since digital computers with basic mathematics can easily expose incorrect analysis. Instructions: (1) Circular – You can enter any variable number in the sample boxes below as well as follow the instructions stated herein.
  • 2. (2) Rectangular – Again you may enter any number that applies to your specific problem and follow the instructions to enter and to proceed to next.
  • 3. This software was based on the analytical equations published by Universal Publishers of Boca Raton, Florida in 2004, years after the software was created and ignored globally by experts. Hence, an example from this software is shown below for experts to dispute the numbers indicated as minimum yield capacity of a given column rectangular section according to Euler’s, Hooke’s Law and Pythagorean Theorem. ……………………………………………………………………………………………… * Column software using the parabolic stress method and 2 pivot points. The Microsoft Excel program was prepared by William R. Mulford of Port Washington, New York and assisted by Ramon V. Jarquio, P.E. in entering all the hundreds of derived equations in their respective cells. This software was registered in the Library of Congress and Bill submitted the technical details of this software as required by the Library of Congress. An example of this software is shown here to show the power of this software which was advertised in ASCE magazine 2 decades ago. All declared experts then ignored this analytical approach and did not admit the mistake of using only 1 pivot point and the rotation of XYZ axes in a 3D structural analysis invoking the established Euler’s, Hooke’s Law and Pythagorean Theorem. Even today approximate methods with finite-element are being copied and implemented globally. A new paradigm of exactitude using electronic digital computers should be employed with basic mathematics to derive the required structural solutions in any problem. This software for reinforced concrete sections in highway and building column components should be utilized by all agencies. Figure1: Minimum Yield Capacity
  • 4.
  • 5. Table 1: Key Points of the Minimum Yield Capacity Curve RECTANGULAR COLUMN INTERACTION CURVE { 30x20 in. WITH 18 - 1in. BARS } DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR 1 COLUMN CAPACITY AXIS 0.588 RADIANS C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z Q= 67.305 817 765 -817 2878 0 3643 .000 5708 1.567 R= 36.056 2404 538 3880 2490 6284 3028 2.076 706 .233 S= 31.896 2757 470 5898 2237 8655 2707 3.197 -1439 -.532 T= 19.664 4889 60 8824 1164 13713 1224 11.201 -4997 -4.081 U= 18.877 5024 24 8664 1092 13688 1116 12.268 -4938 -4.426 V= 9.147 3657 -283 3655 283 7312 0 82611.706 -1755 -19823.852 Q=Theoretical maximum axial load R=Full section in compression S=Zero tension in rebar T=Max moment capacity of section U=Balanced loading condition V=Beam condition
  • 6. Table 2: User Input / Output Information RECTANGULAR COLUMN INTERACTION CURVE { 30x20 in. WITH 18 - 1in. BARS } LENGTH of RECTANGLE 30 in. BARS ALONG LENGTH 5 WIDTH of RECTANGLE 20 in. BARS ALONG WIDTH 6 CLEARANCE BAR CENTER to FACE 3.00 in. TOTAL BARS in COLUMN 18 REBAR DIAMETER 1.000 in. NUMBER of BUNDLES 0 STEEL STRENGTH 60.00 kips/sq. in. Space Between BARS, Along Length 5.000 in. CONCRETE STRENGTH 5.00 kips/sq. in. Space Between BARS, Along Width 1.800 in. DESIGN SAFETY FACTOR 1.00 BARS on CENTER, ALONG LENGTH 6.000 in. % of STEEL to CONCRETE 2.36% BARS on CENTER,ALONG WIDTH 2.800 in. RADIANS .58800 CONCRETE STRAIN .0030 MODULUS of ELASTICITY Es 29000 kips/sq. in. EQUIVALENT DIAMETER VOLUME of CONCRETE WEIGHT of STEEL REBARS cu. yd. per ft. of COLUMN .1542 lbs. per ft. of COLUMN 48.11
  • 7. Table 3: Numerical Values of Minimum Yield Capacity 30x20 in. with 18 - 1in. BARS, DESIGN S.F.1, COLUMN CAPACITY AXIS 0.588 RADIANS C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z=Mz / P V= 9.147 3657 -283 3655 283 7312 0 -1755 10.000 3872 -253 4207 339 8080 85 94.819 -2004 -23.520 11.000 4103 -219 4861 410 8964 191 47.012 -2352 -12.332 12.000 4306 -186 5510 487 9817 301 32.571 -2746 -9.110 13.000 4489 -153 6133 569 10622 417 25.486 -3170 -7.606 14.000 4642 -121 6712 655 11354 534 21.281 -3574 -6.698 15.000 4772 -90 7238 742 12010 652 18.413 -3939 -6.038 16.000 4878 -60 7702 831 12581 772 16.306 -4265 -5.528 17.000 4953 -30 8102 921 13054 891 14.654 -4548 -5.105 18.000 5000 -2 8432 1012 13432 1010 13.295 -4781 -4.732 U= 18.877 5024 24 8664 1092 13688 1116 12.268 -4938 -4.426 19.000 5004 30 8692 1103 13695 1133 12.090 -4948 -4.368 T= 19.664 4889 60 8824 1164 13713 1224 11.201 -4997 -4.081 20.000 4830 76 8879 1195 13709 1270 10.791 -5014 -3.946 21.000 4648 120 8993 1287 13641 1407 9.697 -5030 -3.576 22.000 4460 163 9032 1379 13492 1542 8.751 -4995 -3.240 23.000 4265 204 8997 1471 13261 1674 7.921 -4902 -2.928 24.000 4061 243 8886 1563 12947 1805 7.172 -4755 -2.634 25.000 3860 279 8700 1655 12560 1934 6.494 -4570 -2.363 26.000 3662 315 8440 1747 12103 2061 5.871 -4301 -2.087 27.000 3472 348 8114 1837 11586 2185 5.303 -3937 -1.802 28.000 3305 377 7732 1926 11037 2303 4.793 -3499 -1.520 29.000 3144 404 7303 2011 10447 2416 4.325 -3007 -1.245 30.000 2996 429 6839 2093 9834 2522 3.899 -2481 -.984 31.000 2865 451 6349 2171 9214 2622 3.513 -1935 -.738 S= 31.896 2757 470 5898 2237 8655 2707 3.197 -1439 -.532 32.000 2747 472 5845 2245 8592 2716 3.163 -1382 -.509 33.000 2658 489 5337 2313 7995 2803 2.852 -835 -.298 34.000 2572 506 4837 2377 7409 2883 2.570 -303 -.105 35.000 2490 522 4356 2435 6845 2957 2.315 205 .069 36.000 2408 537 3904 2487 6312 3024 2.087 680 .225 R= 36.056 2404 538 3880 2490 6284 3028 2.076 706 .233 37.000 2326 551 3492 2534 5818 3084 1.886 1113 .361 38.000 2248 564 3117 2575 5364 3139 1.709 1505 .480 39.000 2173 576 2775 2612 4947 3188 1.552 1863 .584 40.000 2101 588 2463 2645 4564 3232 1.412 2189 .677 41.000 2032 599 2178 2674 4210 3273 1.286 2488 .760 42.000 1964 609 1917 2700 3880 3309 1.173 2764 .835 43.000 1898 619 1677 2723 3575 3342 1.070 3018 .903 44.000 1835 628 1457 2744 3292 3372 .976 3251 .964 45.000 1774 637 1255 2762 3029 3400 .891 3466 1.019 46.000 1716 646 1069 2778 2785 3425 .813 3663 1.070 47.000 1660 655 897 2793 2557 3448 .742 3845 1.115 48.000 1604 662 739 2806 2343 3468 .676 4017 1.158 49.000 1550 670 592 2817 2142 3487 .614 4177 1.198 50.000 1498 677 457 2827 1955 3504 .558 4324 1.234
  • 8. 51.000 1448 684 332 2836 1780 3519 .506 4461 1.268 52.000 1400 690 216 2844 1615 3534 .457 4588 1.298 53.000 1353 696 108 2850 1461 3547 .412 4706 1.327 Table 3 continued C M steel P steel M concrete P concrete M P e=M / P Mz z=Mz / P 54.000 1308 703 8 2856 1316 3559 .370 4815 1.353 55.000 1264 709 -85 2861 1180 3570 .330 4917 1.377 56.000 1222 714 -171 2865 1051 3579 .294 5011 1.400 57.000 1180 719 -251 2869 929 3588 .259 5097 1.420 58.000 1140 725 -326 2872 814 3596 .226 5177 1.440 59.000 1100 729 -395 2874 705 3604 .196 5252 1.457 60.000 1062 734 -460 2876 602 3610 .167 5321 1.474 61.000 1025 739 -520 2878 505 3616 .140 5386 1.489 62.000 990 743 -576 2879 413 3622 .114 5447 1.504 63.000 955 748 -629 2879 326 3627 .090 5503 1.517 64.000 921 752 -677 2880 244 3631 .067 5556 1.530 65.000 889 756 -723 2880 166 3635 .046 5605 1.542 66.000 857 760 -765 2879 91 3639 .025 5651 1.553 67.000 826 764 -805 2879 21 3642 .006 5694 1.563 Q= 67.305 817 765 -817 2878 0 3643 .000 5708 1.567