INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND
         ATTENTION
                      Mariano Fernández Enguita
                       Universityof Salamanca
                          www.enguita.info




  International SociologicalAssociationResearchCommitteeFuturesResearch (RC07)
                           XVII World CongressofSociology
                        Gothenburg, Sweden, 11-17 July 2010



                                                                                 1
INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND
           ATTENTION


• POLARIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE
• GLOBALIZATION OF LABOR
  MARKET, INEQUALITY AND SCHOOL
• FROM DETACHMENT THRU DISENGAGEMENT
  TO REJECTION
INFORMATION≠ KNOWLEDGE
• Whereisthewisdomwehavelost in knowledge?
  Whereistheknowledgewehavelost in information?
  (T.S.Eliot, The Rock)
• Information= data(Parker, etc.)
• Knowledge= meaningful information (Kochen)
• UNESCO: IS≠ KS
  – IS based on technological advance, risk of overload
  – KS, addressed to welfare, comprises social, political
    and ethical
Information and knowledge
• IS opens, cheapens and democratizes access
  to information
• By the very same reason, ir makes knowledge
  more scarce, mor expensive, more
  hyerarchical
• Information overload(Toffler),Information
  anxiety (Wurman)
• Nor info rich and info poor (Haywood), but
  logorich and logopoor
SKILLS POLARIZATION
Insustituibiliad del conociminto,            Object to which work is applied
ergo del trabajohumano              Things               People            Data
Task complexity New                      +                 +                   +
and type of     routines., Creat
knowledge       ive or
                Innovative k.
                 Select routines,        -                 +                   -
                 Diagnostic or
                 Professional k.
                 Fixed routines,         -                 +                   -
                 Operational k.


LogorricosyLogopobres
    CEDEFOP, CINE 2/3 y 4/5 comocortes

                                                                                   5
By threes
• Weber: Means of production, of
  administration, of knowledge
• Three industrial revolutions: manufacture,
  taylorism, informatization
• Three sources of power: (absolute) propriety,
  (organizational) authority, )scarce)
  qualification
• Three elements of any system: matter, energy,
  information
IS, KS =Learning Society
• Reflexive, (auto)critical, innovative knowledge
  = learning
  – No longer a conservative knowledge of the Book
• Shortening of product and technology cycles
  – Keep learning to stay in the same position, state of
    the art
• Matthew effect
  – An accumulative spiral
Matthew effect
            or The Parable of Talents
•
  “'Youwicked, lazyservant! So youknewthat I harvestwhere I
  havenotsownandgatherwhere I havenotscatteredseed?
  Wellthen, youshouldhaveput my moneyon deposit
  withthebankers, so thatwhen I returned I
  wouldhavereceivedit back withinterest.
  'Takethetalentfromhimandgiveittotheonewho has the ten
  talents. Foreveryonewho has will be given more, and he
  willhaveanabundance. Whoeverdoesnothave, even what he
  has will be takenfromhim.
  Andthrowthatworthlessservantoutside, intothedarkness, whe
  retherewill be weepingandgnashingofteeth.'” (M25:23)
• Torriano:Denaro chiama denaro
• Stanovich: cumulative differences in reading performance
Logorich and Logopoor
                          LOGORRICO                       LOGOPOBRE
Schooling                 ISCED5a, 5b or more(Univ.)      ISCED 2 (junior HS) or less
Job chances               Higher, skilled                 Lesser, unskilled
Job content               Rich, formative                 Rutinary, impoverishing
On the job training       Yes, more, for promotion        No, less, for firing
Vocational training       No, but in fact they get in     Yes, but not much effective
Retorn to school system Likelu, for specialization        Unlikely, for recoveing
Self teaching             More, due to ability and self   Less, by opposite reasons
                          esteem
Cultural consumption      Higher economic and symbolic Lower value
                          value
A global labor market
• Due to labor and other factor mobility
  – International competition (nations) gives floor to
    global competition (individuals)
• Global labor competition
  – Labor force migration (hindered by law and culture)
  – Relocation of productive processes (favored by
    liberalization, costs, innovation, land prices)
  – Trade in goods (highly libralized) and services (more
    strongly resisted)
• To which competition with machines must be
  added

                                                            10
A global labor force

• English as lingua franca
• Community of academics, experts,
  administrators
• International assessments
• Competencies approach
• Coming services trade liberalization


                                         11
LA GLOBALIZACIÓN EDUCACIONAL
The usual cliché says that globalization is in an
  exclusive or dominant way
• Economic and cultural
• But neither political nor “social” (welfare)
Reality is that there exists, at least, one global
  institution: the school
• The precedent of Universitas
• Neo-institutionalist analysis (Meyer, etc.)
                                                     12
IKS: ATTENTION AS AN SCARCE GOOD
• Economy/ics of attention: Simon, Goldhaber,
  Lanham
• School declines when t was presumed to reach its
  halcyonic moment
• BourdieuandPasseron’scultural arbitrary, then
  the ultimate secret revealed to the scholar, now is
  the point of departure for the pupil
• From the “doors of learning and culture” to
  closing doors and ignoring windows
                                                    13
The place of education
• Prioritary for society, but secondary for
  teenagers
  – Youth Survey 2008:
     • Study, very important for 40% (only more than religion
       and politics)
  – Willingness to continue (1996-2000) fell
     • from93to62%among 15-17,
     • from70to40among18-20,
     • from54to34among21-24

                                                                14
The underestimation of school
• Instrumental underestimation
  – More likely among the working class children
  – The belief that received education“is adequate to
    what I shall need in the future” fello from 91,1% in
    primary to 54,5% in baccalaureat (Marchesi et al.
    2006)
  – Rejection
• Expressive understimarion
  – More likely among the middle class children
  – Innerabsenteeism

                                                           15
TEACHERS
• Key and main resource of the institution
• Devaluated by Knowledge Society
  – Before families with rising education level
  – Before communities full of logical resources
  – Before pupils who are digital natives
• The Gutenberg Army
  – Fit to lead us towards the Gutenberg Galaxy
  – Ill-equipped to lead us to the Internet Galaxy
Thanksforyourattention!
                    Mariano Fernández Enguita
                     Universityof Salamanca
                        www.enguita.info




International SociologicalAssociationResearchCommitteeFuturesResearch (RC07)
                         XVII World CongressofSociology
                      Gothenburg, Sweden, 11-17 July 2010



                                                                               17

INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTENTION.pptx

  • 1.
    INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTENTION Mariano Fernández Enguita Universityof Salamanca www.enguita.info International SociologicalAssociationResearchCommitteeFuturesResearch (RC07) XVII World CongressofSociology Gothenburg, Sweden, 11-17 July 2010 1
  • 2.
    INFORMATION, KNOWLEDGE AND ATTENTION • POLARIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE • GLOBALIZATION OF LABOR MARKET, INEQUALITY AND SCHOOL • FROM DETACHMENT THRU DISENGAGEMENT TO REJECTION
  • 3.
    INFORMATION≠ KNOWLEDGE • Whereisthewisdomwehavelostin knowledge? Whereistheknowledgewehavelost in information? (T.S.Eliot, The Rock) • Information= data(Parker, etc.) • Knowledge= meaningful information (Kochen) • UNESCO: IS≠ KS – IS based on technological advance, risk of overload – KS, addressed to welfare, comprises social, political and ethical
  • 4.
    Information and knowledge •IS opens, cheapens and democratizes access to information • By the very same reason, ir makes knowledge more scarce, mor expensive, more hyerarchical • Information overload(Toffler),Information anxiety (Wurman) • Nor info rich and info poor (Haywood), but logorich and logopoor
  • 5.
    SKILLS POLARIZATION Insustituibiliad delconociminto, Object to which work is applied ergo del trabajohumano Things People Data Task complexity New + + + and type of routines., Creat knowledge ive or Innovative k. Select routines, - + - Diagnostic or Professional k. Fixed routines, - + - Operational k. LogorricosyLogopobres CEDEFOP, CINE 2/3 y 4/5 comocortes 5
  • 6.
    By threes • Weber:Means of production, of administration, of knowledge • Three industrial revolutions: manufacture, taylorism, informatization • Three sources of power: (absolute) propriety, (organizational) authority, )scarce) qualification • Three elements of any system: matter, energy, information
  • 7.
    IS, KS =LearningSociety • Reflexive, (auto)critical, innovative knowledge = learning – No longer a conservative knowledge of the Book • Shortening of product and technology cycles – Keep learning to stay in the same position, state of the art • Matthew effect – An accumulative spiral
  • 8.
    Matthew effect or The Parable of Talents • “'Youwicked, lazyservant! So youknewthat I harvestwhere I havenotsownandgatherwhere I havenotscatteredseed? Wellthen, youshouldhaveput my moneyon deposit withthebankers, so thatwhen I returned I wouldhavereceivedit back withinterest. 'Takethetalentfromhimandgiveittotheonewho has the ten talents. Foreveryonewho has will be given more, and he willhaveanabundance. Whoeverdoesnothave, even what he has will be takenfromhim. Andthrowthatworthlessservantoutside, intothedarkness, whe retherewill be weepingandgnashingofteeth.'” (M25:23) • Torriano:Denaro chiama denaro • Stanovich: cumulative differences in reading performance
  • 9.
    Logorich and Logopoor LOGORRICO LOGOPOBRE Schooling ISCED5a, 5b or more(Univ.) ISCED 2 (junior HS) or less Job chances Higher, skilled Lesser, unskilled Job content Rich, formative Rutinary, impoverishing On the job training Yes, more, for promotion No, less, for firing Vocational training No, but in fact they get in Yes, but not much effective Retorn to school system Likelu, for specialization Unlikely, for recoveing Self teaching More, due to ability and self Less, by opposite reasons esteem Cultural consumption Higher economic and symbolic Lower value value
  • 10.
    A global labormarket • Due to labor and other factor mobility – International competition (nations) gives floor to global competition (individuals) • Global labor competition – Labor force migration (hindered by law and culture) – Relocation of productive processes (favored by liberalization, costs, innovation, land prices) – Trade in goods (highly libralized) and services (more strongly resisted) • To which competition with machines must be added 10
  • 11.
    A global laborforce • English as lingua franca • Community of academics, experts, administrators • International assessments • Competencies approach • Coming services trade liberalization 11
  • 12.
    LA GLOBALIZACIÓN EDUCACIONAL Theusual cliché says that globalization is in an exclusive or dominant way • Economic and cultural • But neither political nor “social” (welfare) Reality is that there exists, at least, one global institution: the school • The precedent of Universitas • Neo-institutionalist analysis (Meyer, etc.) 12
  • 13.
    IKS: ATTENTION ASAN SCARCE GOOD • Economy/ics of attention: Simon, Goldhaber, Lanham • School declines when t was presumed to reach its halcyonic moment • BourdieuandPasseron’scultural arbitrary, then the ultimate secret revealed to the scholar, now is the point of departure for the pupil • From the “doors of learning and culture” to closing doors and ignoring windows 13
  • 14.
    The place ofeducation • Prioritary for society, but secondary for teenagers – Youth Survey 2008: • Study, very important for 40% (only more than religion and politics) – Willingness to continue (1996-2000) fell • from93to62%among 15-17, • from70to40among18-20, • from54to34among21-24 14
  • 15.
    The underestimation ofschool • Instrumental underestimation – More likely among the working class children – The belief that received education“is adequate to what I shall need in the future” fello from 91,1% in primary to 54,5% in baccalaureat (Marchesi et al. 2006) – Rejection • Expressive understimarion – More likely among the middle class children – Innerabsenteeism 15
  • 16.
    TEACHERS • Key andmain resource of the institution • Devaluated by Knowledge Society – Before families with rising education level – Before communities full of logical resources – Before pupils who are digital natives • The Gutenberg Army – Fit to lead us towards the Gutenberg Galaxy – Ill-equipped to lead us to the Internet Galaxy
  • 17.
    Thanksforyourattention! Mariano Fernández Enguita Universityof Salamanca www.enguita.info International SociologicalAssociationResearchCommitteeFuturesResearch (RC07) XVII World CongressofSociology Gothenburg, Sweden, 11-17 July 2010 17