Inference Theory of the Predicate
Calculus
• Foundations, Logic, and Applications
• Presented by: [Your Name]
• Institution: [Your Institution]
• Date: [Insert Date]
Introduction to Predicate Calculus
• Predicate calculus (First-Order Logic) extends
propositional logic by introducing quantifiers
and predicates. It allows representation of
statements involving objects and their
properties.
• Applications include AI, formal verification,
and knowledge representation.
• Example:
• - Propositional logic: P → "Socrates is mortal"
• - Predicate logic: Human(x) → Mortal(x)
Components of Predicate Logic
• - Predicates: Functions returning true/false,
e.g., Likes(John, IceCream)
• - Constants: Specific objects like John,
IceCream
• - Variables: x, y, z
• - Quantifiers: (universal), (existential)
∀ ∃
• - Connectives: , , ¬, →, ↔
∧ ∨
Syntax of Predicate Calculus
• Syntax defines well-formed formulas (WFFs).
• Rules:
• - Correct arity for predicates
• - Proper use of quantifiers
• - Correct parenthesis usage
• Examples:
• - Valid: x (P(x) Q(x))
∀ ∨
• - Invalid: P(x)
∀ ∧
Semantics of Predicate Calculus
• Semantics assign meaning to formulas.
• - Domain: Set of objects
• - Interpretation: Maps constants/predicates
• Truth Conditions:
• - x P(x) is true if P(x) holds for all x
∀
• - x P(x) is true if P(x) holds for at least one x
∃
What is Inference Theory?
• Inference Theory is about deriving conclusions
from premises using formal rules.
• Formal: Γ φ means φ is derivable from
⊢
premises Γ.
• Enables automation of logical deduction and
reasoning.
Inference Rules in Predicate
Calculus
• - Universal Instantiation (UI): From x P(x),
∀
infer P(a)
• - Existential Instantiation (EI): From x P(x),
∃
infer P(c)
• - Universal Generalization (UG): From P(x),
infer x P(x)
∀
• - Existential Generalization (EG): From P(a),
infer x P(x)
∃
• - Modus Ponens (MP): From P and P → Q,
infer Q
Soundness and Completeness
• - Soundness: If Γ φ, then φ is true in all
⊢
models (Γ φ)
⊨
• - Completeness: If φ is true in all models, then
it is derivable (Γ φ)
⊢
• These ensure reliability and power of logical
systems.
Proof Techniques
• - Natural Deduction: Uses rules to mimic
human reasoning
• - Resolution: Uses refutation, CNF, and
unification
• Used in AI and formal verification (e.g., Prolog,
theorem provers)
Sample Inference Derivation
• Given:
• 1. x (Human(x) → Mortal(x))
∀
• 2. Human(Socrates)
• Steps:
• - UI on 1: Human(Socrates) →
Mortal(Socrates)
• - MP with 2: Mortal(Socrates)
Applications of Predicate Calculus
• - AI: Knowledge representation, expert
systems
• - Software: Formal verification
• - Databases: Logic-based querying
• - Mathematics and Linguistics: Proofs and
syntax analysis
Conclusion
• Predicate calculus enables expressive logical
representation.
• Inference theory powers reasoning and
automation.
• Next steps: Explore proof systems, logic
programming, and theorem provers.

Inference_Theory_of_Predicate_Calculus.pptx

  • 1.
    Inference Theory ofthe Predicate Calculus • Foundations, Logic, and Applications • Presented by: [Your Name] • Institution: [Your Institution] • Date: [Insert Date]
  • 2.
    Introduction to PredicateCalculus • Predicate calculus (First-Order Logic) extends propositional logic by introducing quantifiers and predicates. It allows representation of statements involving objects and their properties. • Applications include AI, formal verification, and knowledge representation. • Example: • - Propositional logic: P → "Socrates is mortal" • - Predicate logic: Human(x) → Mortal(x)
  • 3.
    Components of PredicateLogic • - Predicates: Functions returning true/false, e.g., Likes(John, IceCream) • - Constants: Specific objects like John, IceCream • - Variables: x, y, z • - Quantifiers: (universal), (existential) ∀ ∃ • - Connectives: , , ¬, →, ↔ ∧ ∨
  • 4.
    Syntax of PredicateCalculus • Syntax defines well-formed formulas (WFFs). • Rules: • - Correct arity for predicates • - Proper use of quantifiers • - Correct parenthesis usage • Examples: • - Valid: x (P(x) Q(x)) ∀ ∨ • - Invalid: P(x) ∀ ∧
  • 5.
    Semantics of PredicateCalculus • Semantics assign meaning to formulas. • - Domain: Set of objects • - Interpretation: Maps constants/predicates • Truth Conditions: • - x P(x) is true if P(x) holds for all x ∀ • - x P(x) is true if P(x) holds for at least one x ∃
  • 6.
    What is InferenceTheory? • Inference Theory is about deriving conclusions from premises using formal rules. • Formal: Γ φ means φ is derivable from ⊢ premises Γ. • Enables automation of logical deduction and reasoning.
  • 7.
    Inference Rules inPredicate Calculus • - Universal Instantiation (UI): From x P(x), ∀ infer P(a) • - Existential Instantiation (EI): From x P(x), ∃ infer P(c) • - Universal Generalization (UG): From P(x), infer x P(x) ∀ • - Existential Generalization (EG): From P(a), infer x P(x) ∃ • - Modus Ponens (MP): From P and P → Q, infer Q
  • 8.
    Soundness and Completeness •- Soundness: If Γ φ, then φ is true in all ⊢ models (Γ φ) ⊨ • - Completeness: If φ is true in all models, then it is derivable (Γ φ) ⊢ • These ensure reliability and power of logical systems.
  • 9.
    Proof Techniques • -Natural Deduction: Uses rules to mimic human reasoning • - Resolution: Uses refutation, CNF, and unification • Used in AI and formal verification (e.g., Prolog, theorem provers)
  • 10.
    Sample Inference Derivation •Given: • 1. x (Human(x) → Mortal(x)) ∀ • 2. Human(Socrates) • Steps: • - UI on 1: Human(Socrates) → Mortal(Socrates) • - MP with 2: Mortal(Socrates)
  • 11.
    Applications of PredicateCalculus • - AI: Knowledge representation, expert systems • - Software: Formal verification • - Databases: Logic-based querying • - Mathematics and Linguistics: Proofs and syntax analysis
  • 12.
    Conclusion • Predicate calculusenables expressive logical representation. • Inference theory powers reasoning and automation. • Next steps: Explore proof systems, logic programming, and theorem provers.