The Kashmir dispute involves the conflicting claims of India and Pakistan over the region, threatening global peace and security. India claims sovereignty over Kashmir based on an instrument of accession signed by the Maharaja in 1946, while Pakistan argues this instrument is invalid as it did not follow the criteria set by the viceroy. The dispute has broader geopolitical implications, with the USSR historically supporting India and the US aligning more closely with Pakistan, while China's growing nuclear capabilities are also a strategic concern for India.

4. - The international perspective of the Kashmir dispute should focus on
The position of the two subjects of international law involved in the
dispute: Pakistan and India. It´s a conflict that threatens the peace and
security globally.
-International Controversy:
For India: the Instrument of Accession, signed by the Maharaja of
Jammu and Kashmir on 26 October 1946
For Pakistan: that instrument of accession is null because it does not
respect the criteria of the Viceroy Mountbatten about the
accession of principalities to either State
- Global conflict: URSS supports India in the conflict.
The United States were getting closer to Pakistan

9. India is different. The vision of Indian politics is
global in comparisons with Pakistan and its
strategic concern is for pakistan but also for India.
* Because China is the main rival of India
because it has more progress on nuclear and
missile issues.
Unlike India, Pakistan does not have an
official doctrine on nuclear weapons.