PMA2020 uses mobile technology to conduct rapid, nationally representative surveys on key family planning indicators in ten countries. In Indonesia, it is led by the National Population and Family Planning Board in collaboration with three universities. The project is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and provides data on contraceptive use, unmet need, method choice and quality of care. The first round of data collection in Indonesia's Makassar district sampled 1,131 households and 52 health facilities to monitor family planning indicators.

1. PMA2020 is a project that uses innovative mobile technology to sup-
port low-cost, rapid-turnaround, nationally representative surveys to
monitor key indicators for family planning. The project is implemented
by local university and research organizations in ten countries, deploy-
ing a cadre of female resident enumerators trained in mobile-assisted
data collection. PMA2020/Indonesia is led by the National Population
and Family Planning Board of Indonesia (BKKBN) in collaboration
with field implementation teams at three top Indonesian Universities
- Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Universitas Hasanuddin (UNHAS)
and Universitas Sumatera Utara (USU). Overall direction and support
is provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and
Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health though a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
For more information on PMA2020 please visit http://www.pma2020.org
Current Modern Method Mix Among Contraceptive Users in Union
Unmet Need
Traditional Method
Modern Method
PMA2015/MAKASSAR-R1
PERFORMANCE, MONITORING & ACCOUNTABILITY 2020Percentage
KEY FAMILY PLANNING INDICATORS
Select Family Planning Indicators Across Recent Surveys
(Women in Union and All Women, Ages 15-49)
PMA2015/
Indonesia-R1
PMA2015/
Makassar-R1
All
Women
Women
in Union
All
Women
Women
in Union
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR)
All Methods CPR 47.1 61.1 27.8 43.0
Modern Method Use mCPR 45.8 59.5 26.1 40.4
Long Acting CPR 10.3 13.2 5.2 7.8
Total Unmet Need* 11.2 14.4 16.7 25.4
For Limiting 6.1 7.9 8.3 13.0
For Spacing 5.1 6.5 8.4 12.4
Total Demand 58.2 75.5 44.5 68.4
Demand Satisfied by Modern Method (%) 78.7 78.8 58.7 59.0
Fertility Indicators (All Women)
PMA2015/
Indonesia-R1
PMA2015/
Makassar-R1
Recent Births Unintended* (%) 16.0 26.3
Wanted Later 12.1 23.8
Wanted No More 3.9 2.5
* Indicator measurement based on different questions posed in the DHS and PMA2020
Current Use and Unmet Need Among Women in Union of
Reproductive Age, by Wealth Quintile
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Q5Q4Q3Q2Q1
80
60
40
20
0
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
% Demand Satisfied
by Modern Method
Q1: Poorest quintile
Q5: Wealthiest quintile
1575.0% 60.0% 63.0% 62.0%43.0%
12.8 23.7
23.2 34.7
29.4
Unmet Need: 25.4%
mCPR: 40.4%
44+27+14+9+4+2IUD 13.2%
Injectables 44.3%
Implants 1.9%
Female Sterilization 4.2%
Pills 26.8%
Male condoms 9.4%
100
80
60
40
20
0
Implants/IUDs
Injectables
Male/Female
SterilizationPills
Male Condoms
Source of Method, by Provider (Married Women, ages 15-49)
Unmet Need and Contraceptive Use, by Age (all Women)
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Unmet Need
Traditional
Methods
Short-acting
Methods
Long-acting
Methods
Age
0
20
40
60
80 80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
Other
Private shop
Village Midw
Private Midw
Private Heal
Public Fieldw
Public Healt
OtherCondomPillInjectableImplant
Public Health Center
Public Field Worker/
Mobile outreach
Private Health Center/
provider
Private midwife
Village midwife
Private Shop/
Pharmacy
Other

2. PMA2015/MAKASSAR/INDONESIA-R1
INDICATORS FOR ACCESS, EQUITY, QUALITY AND CHOICE
-- October 22, 2015--
100
80
60
40
20
0
PercentageofServiceDeliveryPoints
IUDs
Injectables
Implants
Pills
Male Condoms
IUDs
Injectables
Implants
Pills
Male Condoms
Method in stock Method out of stock Method not offered
For Current Female Users(%), Indicators by Wealth Quintile:
Method Chosen By Self
Or Jointly (91.1%)
Obtained Method Of
Choice (95.9%)
Told Of Other Methods
(51.4%)
Counseled On Side
Effects (48.7%)
Paid For FP Services
(71.3%)
Would Return To Pro-
vider & Refer a Friend
Or Family Member
(59.4%)
Received Method From
Public SDP (28.4%)
43
37
Last Birth Unintended
(26.3%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
6953
59
Births in the Past Five Years, or Current Pregnancies:
73
40
Q1 Q5Q2 Q3 Q4
Indicator(average%)
Q1: Poorest quintile
Q5: Wealthiest quintile
For Current Female Non-Users:
Reasons Mentioned For Non-Use Among All Women Wanting To Delay The Next
Birth 2 Or More Years (%)
Not Married 47.7
Perceived Not-At-Risk/Lack of Need 16.0
Method or Health-related Concerns 29.9
Opposition to Use 4.1
Lack of Access/Knowledge 0.7
Other 11.4
For All Women of Reproductive Age, 15-49:
Total
Median Age at First Marriage (25 to 49 years) 24.0
Median Age at First Sex (25 to 49 years) 22.6
Median Age at First Contraceptive Use 24.7
Median Age at First Birth (25 to 49 years) 24.3
Mean No. Of Living Children At First Contraceptive Use 1.4
Women Having First Birth by Age 18 (ages 18-24, %) 1.6
Received FP Info. From Provider In Last 12 Months (%) 19.1
Exposed to FP Media in Last Few Months (%) 84.8
Facility Type 3 or more methods (n=31) 5 or more methods (n=24)
Hospital 100.0 100.0
Nursing Maternity 100.0 100.0
Health Center 100.0 83.3
Sub-health Center 100.0 0.0
Total 100.0 77.4
Service Delivery Points (n= 52; 31 public, 21 private)
Public Private Total
Among All Service Delivery Points:
Offering Family Planning (%) 100.0 95.2 98.1
With Mobile Teams Visiting Facility In Last 12 Months (%) 71.0 0.0 42.3
Supporting CHWs From This Service Delivery Point (%) 74.2 0.0 44.2
Among Service Delivery Points Offering Family Planning Services:
Average Number Of Days Per Week Family Planning Is Offered 5.8 6.6 5.9
Offering Female Sterilization (%) 22.6 5.0 15.7
Offering Family Planning Counseling/Services To Adolescents (%) 29.0 0.0 17.6
Charging Fees For Family Planning Services (%) 29.0 85.0 51.0
Percent Integrating Family Planning Into Their:
Maternal Health Services (among all offering maternal health services) 100.0 100.0 100.0
HIV Services (among all offering HIV services) 70.4 -- 70.4
Post-Abortion Services (among all offering post-abortion services) 100.0 100.0 100.0
Percent of Public Facilities Offering at Least 3 or 5 Modern Contraceptive
Methods, by Facility Type
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male CondomsPillsInjectablesImplantsIUDS
0
20
40
60
80
100
Male CondomsPillsInjectablesImplantsIUDS
3
81
16
87 90 100 87
10 5
70 90 65
1013 10
85 90 30 35
10
Public Facilities Private Facilities
45
60
26
13 20
3
5
5
Percentage of Service Delivery Points Stocked Out of Contraceptives in the Past
12 Months, by Method, PMA2015
SAMPLE DESIGN
The first round of data collection for PMA2020 in Indonesia used a multi-stage cluster design with province at the first and census blocks at the second stage. The
number of enumeration areas (EAs) determined to provide a national estimate of modern contraceptive prevalence with 1.5% margin of error and 2.0% for urban-ru-
ral strata, was 312 census blocks. The Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) drew a sample of 372 EAs from its master sampling frame to accommodate an
oversample for one province (South Sulawesi with 60 EAs) and one district (Makassar, with 37 EAs). In each EA, the survey team listed and mapped households and
public and private health facilities and randomly selected 35 households and up to 3 private service delivery points. Each Resident Enumerator contacted 35 house-
holds for interview, enumerated all household occupants, and interviewed all eligible females age 15 to 49 in each household. Field Supervisors interviewed three
levels of public health facilities assigned to provide services to residents of each of the selected EAs residents. The final district sample for Makassar included 1,131
households, 1,212 females and 52 health facilities. Data collection was conducted between June and August 2015.