Highlights of IAS 2015
In this downloadable slideset, Andrew Carr, MBBS, MD, FRACP, FRCPA; Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH; and Anton L. Pozniak, MD, FRCP, review key studies presented at the 2015 International AIDS Society conference.
Format: Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt)
File size: 1.73 MB
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
IAS 2015.8th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention
1. July 19-22, 2015
Vancouver, Canada
Highlights of IAS 2015
CCO Official Conference Coverage
of the 8th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment,
and Prevention*
*CCO is an independent medical education company that
provides state-of-the-art medical information to healthcare
professionals through conference coverage and other
educational programs.
This program is supported by an independent educational grant from
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV.
2. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
About These Slides
Users are encouraged to use these slides in their own
noncommercial presentations, but we ask that content
and attribution not be changed. Users are asked to honor
this intent
These slides may not be published or posted online
without permission from Clinical Care Options
(email permissions@clinicaloptions.com)
Disclaimer
The materials published on the Clinical Care Options Web site reflect the views of the authors of the
CCO material, not those of Clinical Care Options, LLC, the CME providers, or the companies providing
educational grants. The materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not
been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A qualified healthcare professional
should be consulted before using any therapeutic product discussed. Readers should verify all information
and data before treating patients or using any therapies described in these materials.
3. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Faculty
Andrew Carr, MBBS, MD,
FRACP, FRCPA
Professor of Medicine
University of New South Wales
Director
HIV, Immunology, and Infectious
Disease Unit
St Vincent's Hospital
Sydney, Australia
Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH
Medical Director of Specialty Services
Southwest CARE Center
Santa Fe, New Mexico
Adjunct Professor of Medicine
Division of Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland
Anton L. Pozniak, MD, FRCP
Consultant Physician
Director of HIV Services
Department of HIV and Genitourinary
Medicine
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
4. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Disclosures
Andrew Carr, MBBS, MD, FRACP, FRCPA, has disclosed that he has
received consulting fees, funds for research support, and fees for non-
CME/CE services from Gilead Sciences, MSD, and ViiV and funds for
research support from Pfizer.
Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH, has disclosed that he has received consulting
fees and funds for research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead
Sciences, Janssen Therapeutics, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare and funds
for research support from AbbVie and Sangamo.
Anton L. Pozniak, MD, FRCP, has disclosed that he has received
consulting fees and funds for research support from Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Therapeutics, Merck, and ViiV.
5. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
UNAIDS: 90-90-90 Treatment Targets
Levi J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAD0102. Reproduced with permission.
100
80
60
40
20
0
HIV Positive
People
Diagnosed On ART Viral
Suppression
36.9
million 33.2
million 29.5
million 26.9
million
Target 1:
90% of HIV+
people
diagnosed
Target 2:
90% of
diagnosed
people on ART
Target 3:
90% of people on
ART with HIV-1
RNA suppression
90%
81%
73%
People(%)
6. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
UNAIDS: 90-90-90 Global Estimated Gaps
100
80
60
40
20
0
HIV Positive
People
Diagnosed On ART Viral
Suppression*
36.9
million
19.8
million
15.0
million 11.6
million
Breakpoint 1:
13.4 million
undiagnosed Breakpoint 2:
14.9 million
not treated
Breakpoint 3:
15.3 million
not virally
suppressed
53%
41%
32%
Levi J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAD0102. Reproduced with permission.
*HIV-1 RNA < 1000 copies/mL.
People(%)
8. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
START: Immediate vs Deferred Therapy
for Asymptomatic, ART-Naive Pts
Immediate ART
ART initiated immediately
following randomization
(n = 2326)
INSIGHT START Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print]. Lundgren J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract
MOSY0302.
Deferred ART
Deferred until CD4+ cell count ≤ 350 cells/mm3
,
AIDS, or event requiring ART
(n = 2359)
HIV-positive, ART-naive
adults with CD4+ cell
count > 500 cells/mm3
(N = 4685)
Study closed by DSMB
following interim analysis
9. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
START: 57% Reduced Risk of Serious
Events or Death With Immediate ART
4.1% vs 1.8% in deferred vs immediate arms experienced serious AIDS or
non-AIDS–related event or death (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.30-0.62; P < .001)
10
8
6
4
2
0
CumulativePercentWithEvent
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Mo
Deferred ART
Immediate ART
INSIGHT START Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print]. Lundgren J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOSY0302.
Reproduced with permission.
10. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
START: Primary Endpoint Components
With Immediate vs Deferred ART
Endpoint
Immediate ART
(n = 2326)
Deferred ART
(n = 2359) HR
(95% CI)
P Value
N Rate/100 PY N Rate/100 PY
Serious AIDS-related event 14 0.20 50 0.72
0.28
(0.15-0.50)
< .001
Serious non-AIDS–related event 29 0.42 47 0.67
0.61
(0.38-0.97)
.04
All-cause death 12 0.17 21 0.30
0.58
(0.28-1.17)
.13
Tuberculosis 6 0.09 20 0.28
0.29
(0.12-0.73)
.008
Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 0.01 11 0.16
0.09
(0.01-0.71)
.02
Malignant lymphoma 3 0.04 10 0.14
0.30
(0.08-1.10)
.07
Non-AIDS–defining cancer 9 0.13 18 0.26
0.50
(0.22-1.11)
.09
CVD 12 0.17 14 0.20
0.84
(0.39-1.81)
.65
INSIGHT START Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print]. Lundgren J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOSY0302.
11. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
START: Cancer Events With Immediate vs
Deferred ART
Cancer Event, n
Immediate
ART
(n = 2326)
Deferred
ART
(n = 2359)
Total 14 39
Kaposi’s sarcoma 1 11
Lymphoma, NHL + HL 3 10
Prostate cancer 2 3
Lung cancer 2 2
Anal cancer 1 2
Cervical or testis
cancer
1 2
Other types* 4 9
Time to Cancer Event
10
8
6
4
2
0
Cumulative%WithEvent
0 12 24 36 48 60
Mo
*Immediate ART: squamous cell carcinoma, plasma cell myeloma, bladder cancer, fibrosarcoma.
Deferred ART: gastric adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, ureteric cancer, malignant melanoma, myeloid
leukemia, thyroid cancer, leiomyosarcoma, liver cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.
INSIGHT START Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print]. Lundgren J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOSY0302.
Reproduced with permission.
Deferred ART
Immediate ART
Rate/100 PY: immediate, 0.20; deferred, 0.56
(HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19-0.66; P = .001)
12. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
START: Primary Endpoint Events by
Latest CD4+ Cell Count
Latest CD4+ count > 500 cells/mm3
Immediate
ART
Deferred
ART
Primary
events, %
(n/N)
88
(37/42)
59
(57/96)
Rate/100
PY
0.6 1.1
Immediate ART Deferred ART
PercentofFollow-upTime
Latest CD4+ Cell Count (cells/mm3
)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2
(4.7)
No. of Pts With Events
(Rates/100 PY)
No. of Pts With Events
(Rates/100 PY)
3
(0.8)
6
(0.4)
11
(0.6)
20
(0.6)
5
(1.8)
34
(2.0)
34
(1.5)
9
(0.6)
14
(1.1)
<350350-499500-649650-799
≥800
<350350-499500-649650-799
≥800
INSIGHT START Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print]. Lundgren J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOSY0302.
Reproduced with permission.
13. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
TEMPRANO: Immediate or Deferred ART
Initiation ± IPT for African Pts
Randomized, controlled, unblinded, multicenter (Ivory Coast), 2 x 2 factorial
Pts with HIV infection
and CD4+ cell count
< 800 cells/mm3
who did not meet
WHO criteria for
initiating ART*
(N = 2056)
Immediate ART†
(n = 515)
Immediate ART†
+ IPT‡
(n = 518)
Deferred ART§
(n = 511)
Deferred ART§
+ IPT‡
(n = 512)
*WHO criteria evolved during the study (updates 2006, 2010, 2013). †
ART initiated immediately following
randomization. ‡
IPT = 300 mg daily isoniazid initiated 1 mo after enrollment and terminated 7 mos after
enrollment. §
Deferred until meeting WHO criteria for initiating ART.
TEMPRANO ANRS 12136 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print].
Pts in the treatment arms well matched at baseline
– First-line ART primarily EFV + TDF/FTC (68% to 71%) or LPV/RTV + TDF/FTC
(22% to 24%)
Median duration of follow-up: 29.9 mos
14. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
TEMPRANO: Immediate vs Deferred ART
Initiation and IPT Delivery for African Pts
TEMPRANO ANRS 12136 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of print].
Mos From Randomization
CumulativeProbability
ofDeathorSevere
HIV-RelatedIllness(%)
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 6 12 18 24 30
Deferred ART
Deferred ART + IPT
Immediate ART
Immediate ART + IPT
30-Mo Probability, %
14.1
8.8
7.4
5.7
16. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
HPTN 052: ART for Prevention of HIV
Transmission in Serodiscordant Couples
International, randomized, controlled trial
Stable, healthy, sexually
active, HIV-discordant
couples with 350-550
CD4+ cells/mm3
(N = 1763 couples)
Early ART Arm
Initiate ART immediately
(n = 886 couples)
Delayed ART Arm
Initiate ART at CD4+ cell count
≤ 250 cells/mm3
or at development of
AIDS-defining illness
(n = 877 couples)
Participants informed of interim results beginning May 2011; ART offered to all index
participants in delayed ART arm; study continued until May 2015 to determine durability
of HIV transmission prevention
84% of pts in delayed ART arm had initiated ART at Yr 1; 98% of pts had initiated ART
prior to study closure
Cohen MS, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0101LB.
17. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
No linked HIV transmissions observed when index participant stably suppressed on ART
HPTN 052: Partner Infections With Early vs
Delayed ART
8 linked HIV infections diagnosed after seropositive pt started ART
– 4 infections likely occurred before, or soon after, ART initiation, and 4 infections occurred after
ART failure in seropositive pt
Unlinked partner infection rates similar between study arms
Cohen MS, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0101LB.
April 2005 - May 2011 May 2011 - May 2015
Overall
(April 2005 - May 2015)
Partner
Infections, n
(rate/100 PY)
Early
(1751 PY
F/U)
Delayed
(1731 PY F/U)
Early
(2563 PY F/U)
Delayed
(2449 PY F/U)
Early
(4314 PY F/U)
Delayed
(4180 PY F/U)
All 4 (0.23) 42 (2.43) 15 (0.59) 17 (0.69) 19 (0.44) 59 (1.41)
Linked 1 (0.06) 36 (2.08) 2 (0.08) 7 (0.29) 3 (0.07) 43 (1.03)
Risk Reduction With
Early ART, %
All infections 91 -- 14 -- 69 --
Linked
infections 97 -- 72 -- 93 --
18. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
International, randomized, open-label phase II trial; results reported from
Harlem and Bangkok cohorts
HPTN 067/ADAPT: PrEP for MSM/TGW
Mannheimer S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0305LB.
Daily PrEP
1 dose daily
Time-Driven PrEP†
1 dose twice weekly +
1 dose after sex
HIV-negative
MSM and
TGW*
Event-Driven PrEP†
1 dose before and
1 dose after sex
Lead-in period
of directly
observed
therapy
Final
study
visit
TDF/FTC PrEP given at standard dose and dispensed using an electronic monitoring device.
Adherence and sexual risk behavior assessed by weekly interview conducted by phone or in person.
*Other inclusion criteria: reported anal intercourse and ≥ 1 other risk factor for HIV infection in last 6 mos;
creatinine clearance > 70 mL/min.
†
Participants instructed to take no more than 2 doses daily or 7 doses/wk.
Wk 34Wk 30Wk 0 Wk 6
19. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
179 MSM or TGW randomized
– Daily PrEP, n = 59
– Time-driven PrEP, n = 60
– Event-driven PrEP, n = 60
Baseline characteristics: median
age 30 yrs, 98% MSM, 70% black
HIV seroconversion seen in 2 pts
– Both pts had low or undetectable
TDF in dried blood spots/plasma
at study visits
HPTN 067/ADAPT: Harlem Cohort
Comparison of PrEP Strategies
Mannheimer S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0305LB. Reproduced with permission.
*P = .001 vs daily. †
P = .47 vs event driven.
Complete coverage: taking ≥ 1 PrEP dose within 4 days before sex and ≥ 1 dose within 24 hrs after sex.
66
47*†
52*
100
80
60
40
20
0
CompleteCoverage(%)
Daily
Time driven
Event driven
Coverage of Sex Acts
According to PrEP Strategy
20. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Adherence significantly higher in daily dosing arm vs time-driven or event-driven arms
(65% vs 46% vs 41%, respectively; P < .0001 for both comparisons)
Adherence did not differ significantly between the 2 nondaily dosing arms (P = .16)
TFV in Dried Blood SpotsDoses Required vs Taken
HPTN 067/ADAPT: Adherence to PrEP
Strategies in Harlem Cohort
Mannheimer S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0305LB. Reproduced with permission.
Doses required: P < .0001 for all strategy-type comparisons
Doses taken: P < .0001 for daily vs time-driven PrEP and event-
driven vs daily PrEP; P = .33 when comparing nondaily dosing
arms
Low level: detectable to ≤ 350 fmol
High level: > 350 fmol
P = .07 for daily vs time-driven PrEP
P = .01 for daily vs event-driven PrEP
P = .36 for time-driven vs event-driven PrEP
8249
7K
5K
3K
1K
0
Daily Time
Driven
Event
Driven
5526
3674
2468 25722356
Required tablets
Tablets taken
NumberofTablets
9K
80
60
40
20
0
100
%ofPtsReportingSex
inLast7Days(Wk30)
Undetectable
Low level
Higher level
Daily Time
Driven
Event
Driven
50
22
28
39
17
44
56
28
17
21. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
HPTN 067/ADAPT: Bangkok Cohort
Comparison of PrEP Strategies
178 MSM or TGW randomized
– Daily PrEP, n = 60
– Time-driven PrEP, n = 59
– Event-driven PrEP, n = 59
Baseline characteristics:
median age 31 yrs, 99% MSM,
100% Asian
Holtz TH, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0306LB.
Reproduced with permission.
*P = .02 vs daily arm, P = .04 vs time driven
arm. Complete coverage defined as taking
≥ 1 PrEP dose within 4 days before sex and
≥ 1 dose within 24 hrs after sex.
100
80
60
40
20
0
85 84
74*
Daily
Time driven
Event driven
Coverage of Sex Acts
According to PrEP Strategy
CompleteCoverage(%)
22. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
HPTN 067/ADAPT: Adherence to PrEP
Strategies in Bangkok Cohort
Doses required vs doses taken Significantly higher adherence with
daily (85%) and time-driven (79%)
vs event-driven (65%) PrEP
(P < .001)
Detectable levels of TFV in PBMCs
were found in 91%, 95%, and 86%
of pts in the daily, time-driven, and
event-driven arms, respectively, at
Wk 30 among participants reporting
sex in past
7 days
HIV seroconversions observed in 2
pts during prerandomization directly
observed dosing phase
– Both associated with undetectable
or low levels of FTC or TFV in
plasma/PBMCs
Doses required and taken: P < .001 for all
strategy-type comparisons.
Holtz TH, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAC0306LB.
Reproduced with permission.
NumberofTablets
Time
Driven
Event
Driven
1928 2157
4121
3713
9420
8285 Required tablets
Tablets reported taken
Daily
10K
8K
6K
4K
2K
0
23. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
PrEP Demo: Implementation of Daily PrEP
by US MSM/TGW
Prospective, open-label, cohort study conducted in 3 US STD or community-
based clinics in San Francisco, Miami, and Washington, DC (N = 557)
– Enrolled HIV-negative MSM (98%) and TGW (1.3%) who met behavioral risk
criteria; participants offered daily TDF/FTC as PrEP for up to 48 wks
Retention rates declined from 93% at Mo 1 to 78% at Mo 12
– Participants with prior PrEP knowledge and those who reported condomless
receptive anal sex at baseline had higher retention rates
63% of participants had protective TFV DBS levels at all study visits
(consistent with ≥ 4 doses/wk)
– Miami location, black race, fewer condomless anal sex partners, and unstable
housing were factors associated with lower rates of protective TFV DBS levels
HIV incidence rates low at 0.43/100 PY (95% CI: 0.05-1.54)
Liu A, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAC0202.
24. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
ATN 110: TDF/FTC PrEP For Young US
MSM
Prospective, open-label, multicenter study
Hosek S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAC0204LB.
Behavioral
Intervention
HIV-negative 18- to
22-yr-old MSM at high
risk for HIV contraction
(N = 200)
Wk 0: PrEP Dispensed
TDF/FTC PrEP
Wk 48
Baseline: mean age 20.2 yrs; 53% black, 21% white, 17%
Latino, 7% other/mixed race, 2% Asian/pacific islander
4 seroconversions through Wk 48; each pt had undetectable
TFV levels
– HIV incidence: 3.29/100 PY
– No drug resistance detected
Behavioral intervention: Many Men, Many Voices (3MV) or Personalized Cognitive Counseling (PCC).
25. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
ATN 110: TDF/FTC PrEP for Young US
MSM
Adherence decreased from baseline to Wk 48
– Undetectable levels of DBS TFV occurred in < 10% of pts at Wk 4 and
~ 30% of pts at Wk 48
Black pts had decreased adherence compared with other races
Hosek S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAC0204LB. Reproduced with permission.
1200
1000
800
600
4+ doses
400
200
0
LevelsofTFVinDBS
(fmol/spot)
4 8 12 24 36 48
Overall
White
Latino
Mixed
Black
4+ doses
Wks
26. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
International, randomized, open-label phase IV trial conducted in
resource-limited settings
REMEMBER: Benefits of Empiric TB
Treatment vs IPT at ART Initiation
Pts in the treatment arms well-matched at baseline
– Pts with CD4+ cell count < 25 c/mm3
: empiric TB arm, 63%; IPT arm, 61%
Hosseinipour M, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAB0205LB.
Preemptive TB Treatment
ART + Empiric TB Treatment*†
(n = 424)
Isoniazid at TB Diagnosis
ART + IPT*‡
(n = 426)
HIV-infected pts
with CD4+ cell count
< 50 cells/mm3
and no active TB
(N = 850)
*Empiric treatment consisted of fixed-dose isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 8 wks,
followed by fixed-dose isoniazid and rifampin for 16 wks. †
ART consisted of EFV + TDF/FTC or 2 NRTIs
available locally. ‡
IPT consisted of isoniazid 300 mg QD for 24 wks.
27. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Empiric TB treatment had no differential impact on risk of death or unknown
status at 24 wks of follow-up vs IPT
Time to death or unknown status did not differ by treatment strategy
IPT treatment was associated with reduced time to confirmed or probable TB
(P = .01) vs empiric TB treatment
Verified TB cases more frequent in empiric TB treatment arm vs IPT arm
(33/424 vs 19/426, respectively)
REMEMBER: Key Results
Absolute risk difference: -0.06% (95% CI: -3.05% to 2.94%; P = .97)
Hosseinipour M, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAB0205LB.
Primary Endpoint, n (%)
ART + Empiric TB Treatment
(n = 424)
ART + IPT
(n = 426)
Death 20 (4.8) 22 (5.2)
Unknown status 2 (< 0.5) 0 (0)
All primary endpoints 22 (5.3) 22 (5.2)
29. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
International, randomized, double-blind phase III trial
Pts generally well matched at baseline
– Pts with HIV-1 RNA > 100,000 copies/mL: EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC arm,
24%; ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC arm, 25%
WAVES: EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC vs ATV/RTV
+ TDF/FTC in Treatment-Naive Women
Squires K, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOLBPE08.
EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC QD +
Placebos for ATV, RTV, and TDF/FTC QD
(n = 289)
ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC QD +
Placebo for EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC QD
(n = 286)
HIV-infected women
with HIV-1 RNA
≥ 500 copies/mL;
no previous ART;
and eGFR ≥ 70 mL/min
(N = 575)
Wk 48
Open-
label
extensio
n
ATV 300 mg; RTV 100 mg; TDF/FTC 300/200 mg; EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC 150/150/300/200 mg
30. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
WAVES: Key Results
EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF superior to
ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC
– Overall treatment difference
6.5% (95% CI: 0.4%-12.6%)
No significant differences between
arms in change from BL for eGFR,
spine or hip BMD, LDL or HDL
cholesterol, total cholesterol to HDL
ratio, or triglycerides
Significantly greater increase in
total cholesterol with
EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC
Lower rate of discontinuations due
to AEs with EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC vs
ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC (2.4% vs
7.0%)
Squires K, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOLBPE08. Reproduced with permission.
HIV-1RNA<50c/mL(%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Overall ≤ 100,000 > 100,000
HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL)
EVG/COBI/TDF/FTC ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC
87
81
86
82
90
78
n = 289 286 220 214 69 72
Emergent Resistance
EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF
(n = 289)
ATV/RTV + TDF/FTC
(n = 286)
Resistance analysis
population 19 21
Developed resistance
mutations to study drugs 0 3
31. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial[1]
– Pts were Thai adults with baseline body weight of 59 kg (both arms)
– Dose of ATV/RTV 200/100 mg has shown adequate pharmacokinetics in
Thai pts[2]
LASA: ATV/RTV 200/100 mg vs 300/100 mg
1. Bunupuradah T, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0101.
2. Avihingsanon A, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:402-408.
Thai pts with HIV-1 RNA
< 50 copies/mL (≥ 12
mos) on boosted PI
regimen for ≥ 3 mos
(N = 550*)
ATV/RTV 200/100 mg QD + 2 NRTIs
(n = 273)
ATV/RTV 300/100 mg QD + 2 NRTIs
(n = 277)
Stratified by site and use
of tenofovir and indinavir
Treatment
Wk 48
*ITT/NC = F population.
32. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
LASA: Key Results
Higher rate of discontinuations with ATV/RTV 300/100 mg vs ATV/RTV 200/100 mg
(7.6% vs 2.6%; P = .01)
‒ ATV/RTV 300/100 mg associated with significantly higher mean total bilirubin and percentage
of pts experiencing grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia (P < .001)
Estimated that treating 20,000 Thai HIV cases with ATV/RTV 200/100 mg instead of
300/100 mg would lead to a 5-yr savings of US$58 million (factoring in a 10% increase
in cases/yr)
‒ Note: PK analysis has shown that the median AUC is 58% higher in Thai pts vs white pts at a
dose of ATV/RTV 300/100 mg[2]
HIV-1RNA<50
cells/mL(%)
P = .03
NC = F
92
86
ATV/RTV 300/100
mg
ATV/RTV 200/100
mg
Difference in % Pts With HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL
Favors ATV/RTV
300/100 mg
Favors ATV/RTV
200/100 mg
P = .03
NC = F
-10 0 10
1. Bunupuradah T, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0101. 2. Avihingsanon A et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 85:402-408.
33. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Randomized, active-controlled, open-label study
Primary endpoint: proportion of pts with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL
after 48 wks of treatment
Switching From TDF- to TAF-Based
Regimens in Virologically Suppressed Pts
Mills A, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0102.
Pts with HIV-1 RNA < 50
copies/mL (≥ 96 wks)
and eGFR > 50 mL/min
on stable TDF-based
regimen for ≥ 48 wks
(N = 1436)
Switch to EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF QD*
(n = 959)
Continue previous TDF-based regimen†
(n = 477)
Primary Endpoint
Wk 48
*EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF (150/150/200/10 mg). †
Previous TDF-based regimens: EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF
(n = 459), EFV/TDF/FTC (n = 376), ATV/(COBI or RTV) + TDF/FTC (n = 601).
Continue
through
Wk 96
34. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Switching From TDF- to TAF-Based
Regimens: Virologic Outcomes
Mills A, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0102. Reproduced with permission.
100
80
60
40
20
0
Wk48HIV-1RNA<50c/mL(%)
All Prior
Regimens
Prior
EFV/TDF/FTC
Prior
Boosted
ATV + TDF/FTC
Prior
EVG/COBI/
FTC/TDF
EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF TDF-based regimenPrimary Endpoint
P < .001 P = .02 P = .02 P = NS
97 93 96
90
97
92
98 97
932/
959
444/
477
241/
251
112/
125
390/
402
183/
199
301/
306
149/
153n/N =
35. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Switching From TDF- to TAF-based
Regimens: Renal and Bone Outcomes
Hip BMD was similarly increased for pts treated with TAF
regimen (P < .001)
Mills A, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0102. Reproduced with permission.
Regimen
Renal Events Leading to
Discontinuation
EVG/COBI/
FTC/TAF
(n = 959)
Acute renal failure
Interstitial nephritis
TDF-based
regimen
(n = 477)
Chronic kidney disease
Elevated serum creatinine
Fanconi syndrome (mild
jaundice)
Increased creatinine
Nephritic colic
(nephrolithiasis)
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
Median%Change
inSpineBMD(Q1,Q3)
Baseline Wk 24
EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF
TDF-based regimen
Wk 48
1.79
-0.28
P < .001
36. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Switching Pts With HIV/HBV Coinfection to
a TAF-Based Regimen
By Wk 48, 2/70 (3%) pts lost HBsAg/gained HBsAb; 2/30 (7%) pts had lost HBeAg; 1/30 (3%) pts
gained HBeAb
Significant improvement in median Wk 48 FibroTest score with switch (-.04; P = .018)
Gallant J, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract WELBPE13. Reproduced with permission.
Pts(%)
94 92
Wk 24
Wk 48
100
80
60
40
20
0
HBV DNA < 29 IU/mL
86 92
International, multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase IIIb trial (N = 72)
– Pts with virologically suppressed HIV infection on any regimen, chronic HBV
coinfection, and eGFR > 50 mL/min switched to EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF for 48 Wks
HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL
100
80
60
40
20
0
37. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Multicenter, open-label phase III trial
GS-112: Switching to a TAF-Based
Regimen in Pts With Renal Impairment
Gupta S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0103.
Virologically suppressed,
HIV-positive pts with
mild-moderate renal
impairment (stable
eGFRCG [30-69 mL/min])
(N = 242)
TDF-Based ART
(n = 158)
Non-TDF–Based ART
(n = 84)
EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF
(N = 242)
Wk 96
PI NNRTI INSTI
CCR5
Antag.
TDF ABC
Other
NRTI
No
NRTI
ART use,% 44 42 24 3 65 22 7 5
Wk 48Wk 24
38. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
GS-112: Key Results
Change in eGFR From
Baseline to Wk 48
Changes in Spinal BMD From
Baseline to Wk 48
Gupta S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0103. Reproduced with permission.
TDF Non-TDF
MedianChange
FromBaseline
10
0
-10
+0.2
-1.8 -1.5
-2.7*
Baseline: 58 53 56 50
eGFRCG
mL/min
eGFRCKD-EPI Cr
mL/min/1.73 m2
*P < .05
TDF Non-TDF
*P < .05
4
2
0
-2
Mean%Change
SpineBMD
2.95*
0.99
Baseline Wk 24 Wk 48
39. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
P007: DOR + TDF/FTC vs EFV + TDF/FTC
in ART-Naive Pts Infected With HIV
Double-blind, randomized, 2-part study
Gatell JM, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0104.
ART-naive, HIV-positive pts
with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000
copies/mL and CD4+ cell
count ≥ 100 cells/mm3
(N = 216*)
Doravirine†
+ TDF/FTC
(n = 108)
Efavirenz‡
+ TDF/FTC*
(n = 108)
*Combined pts from 2 study parts: Part 1 was a dose-finding study (n = 84) and Part 2 enrolled additional
pts with the current dosing schema (n = 132).
†
Doravirine dosed at 100 mg QD.
‡
Efavirenz dosed at 600 mg QD.
§
Wk 24 results reported.
Pts were stratified by HIV-1 RNA
≤ or > 100,000 copies/mL
Wk 96§
40. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
P007: Key Results
Most virologic failure was due to low-level viremia
– Virologic failure, HIV-1 RNA ≥ 40 copies/mL: DOR, 15.7%; EFV, 10.2%
– Virologic failure, HIV-1 RNA ≥ 200 copies/mL: DOR, 3.7%; EFV, 0.9%
Resistance testing was performed in 1 pt in each arm who failed treatment; no NRTI or
NNRTI mutations detected
Gatell JM, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0104.
Pts With HIV-1 RNA
< 40 c/mL, %*
DOR +
TDF/FTC
(n = 108)
EFV +
TDF/FTC
(n = 108)
Wk 8 27.8 26.9
Wk 16 63.6 57.5
Wk 24 72.2 73.1
Baseline HIV-1 RNA
≤ 100,000 c/mL (n/N)†
83.3
(55/66)
85.7
(54/63)
Baseline HIV-1 RNA
> 100,000 c/mL (n/N)†
60.5
(23/38)
65.8
(25/38)
*NC = F approach.
†
Observed failure approach.
Event, %
DOR +
TDF/FTC
(N = 108)
EFV +
TDF/FTC
(N = 108)
One or more AE 75.9 84.3
Serious AE 0.9 4.6
Discontinued due to
AE
0.9 5.6
Drug-related AE 27.8 55.6
Pts with ≥ 1 CNS
event
26.9 46.3
41. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Prospective, observational study
Comparison of Single- and Multiple-Tablet
Regimens in ART-Naive Pts
Gatell JM, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPEB264.
EFV/TDF/FTC Single-Tablet Regimen
(n = 759)
EFV + TDF + FTC Multitablet Regimen*
(n = 483)
Other Multitablet Regimen
(n = 1531)
ART-naive pts assigned
at physician’s discretion
to the noted regimens
(N = 2773)
Baseline Characteristics EFV/TDF/FTC STR EFV/TDF/FTC MTR Other MTR
Age, media (IQR) 37 (31-44) 37 (31-44) 37 (30-44)
Male, % 89 84 81
Median CD4+ cells/mm3
(IQR) 328 (225-446) 274 (175-381) 300 (179-415)
Median HIV-1 RNA copies/mL 37521 25118 27692
Median duration of regimen, yrs (IQR) 2.5 (1-3.6) 0.7 (0.2-1.8) 1.7 (0.7-2.5)
*Regimen could consist of single components (EFV + TDF + FTC) or EFV + coformulated TDF/FTC.
42. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Single- vs Multiple-Tablet Regimens in
ART-Naive Pts: Efficacy and Cost
Gatell JM, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPEB264.
Response,*
%
ART Cost,
Euros
Initiation Cost,
Euros
Cost/Responder,*
Euros
Ratio
EFV/TDF/FTC
STR
79
(n = 759)
7370 9414 12,018 1
EFV + TDF +
FTC MTR
64
(n = 483)
6736 8198 12,651 1.04
Other MTR
64
(n = 1531)
8350 11,380 17,733 1.47
*At 48 wks.
44. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
C-EDGE Coinfection: Grazoprevir/Elbasvir
for Pts Coinfected With HIV/HCV
Multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase III trial
Grazoprevir/Elbasvir
HCV NS3/4A inhibitor/HCV NS5A inhibitor
HCV treatment-naive pts
coinfected with HIV and
GT1, 4, or 6 HCV; stable
on ART ≥ 8 wks
(N = 218)
Wk 12
Coformulation dosed orally 100/50 mg QD
Baseline ART Characteristic, % Grazoprevir/Elbasvir (N = 218)
Undetectable HIV-1 RNA on ART 96.8
ART regimen
Abacavir containing 21.6
TDF containing 75.2
Raltegravir 51.8
Dolutegravir 27.1
Rilpivirine 17.4
Rockstroh JK, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0206LB. Rockstroh JK, et al. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e319-e327.
66% GT1a HCV, 60% had HCV RNA > 800,000 IU/mL, 16% cirrhotic
45. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
0
100
80
60
20
C-EDGE Coinfection: Key Findings
No subgroup provided efficacy
advantage or disadvantage, including
ART regimen
New NS3, NS5A RAVs detected at
failure in 4 of 5 pts who relapsed
Short-lived HIV-1 RNA increases in 2
pts on ART during GZR/EBV
treatment
– Both resuppressed HIV-1 RNA without
change of ART
During GZR/EBV Tx, no significant
changes in CD4+ cell count
GZR/EBV well tolerated: no pt
discontinued for AEs and no serious
treatment-related AEs
SVR12(%)
139/
144
42/
44
27/
28
All Pts GT1a GT1b GT4
96.3 96.5 95.5 96.4
210/
218
SVR12 With 12 Wks GZR/EBV
According to Genotype
Discontinued* 1 0 1 0
Relapse 5 4 0 1
Reinfection 2 1 1 0
*Unrelated to virologic failure.
n/N =
40
Rockstroh JK, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0206LB. Rockstroh JK, et al. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e319-e327. Reproduced
with permission.
46. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
ION-4: LDV/SOF for 12 Wks in GT1/4
HIV/HCV-Coinfected Pts
Phase III, open-label, single-arm study
98% infected with GT1 HCV, 20% cirrhotic, 34% black
No efficacy differences among most subgroups, including prior HCV treatment
and presence of cirrhosis
– SVR12 rates significantly lower in black vs nonblack pts (90% vs 99%, P < .001);
differences noted across ART regimens
HIV disease remained stable during LDV/SOF: CD4+ cell counts remained
stable through treatment, follow-up; no confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound
noted
Regimen well tolerated, with no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity
Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir QD
(n = 335)
Pts with suppressed HIV
infection (HIV-1 RNA < 50
copies/mL) and
GT1/4/6 HCV coinfection
(N = 335)
Wk 12
SVR12, %
96
Naggie S, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0202. Naggie S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;[Epub ahead of
print].
48. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Mother’s history
– Treated with zalcitabine from 13 wks gestation to delivery
– At delivery, HIV-1 RNA level 4.63 million copies/mL; CD4+ cell count 81 cells/mm3
Pt’s history
– ZDV initiated in female pt at birth; HIV-1 RNA undetectable Day 3; HIV-1 DNA
undetectable Days 3 and 14, but detectable at Wk 4
– ZDV interrupted Wk 6; HIV-1 RNA level at Mo 3: 2.17 million copies/mL; ART
initiated (ZDV + ddI + 3TC + RTV)
– LTFU between 5.8 and 6.8 yrs; ART interrupted
– Undetectable HIV-1 RNA level upon return; no further ART since (currently 18 yrs of
age)
HIV-1 RNA in pt remained < 50 copies/mL from 6.8-18.3 yrs of age except for
1 increase at 12 yrs of age (510 copies/mL)
Low levels of replicating virus detected after in vitro stimulation of purified
CD4+ T cells
Sustained Remission > 12 Yrs After
Interrupted ART in Perinatally Infected Pt
Sáez-Cirión A, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract MOAA0105LB.
49. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Randomized, multipart phase IIa trial
AI468002: BMS-955176 + ATV ± RTV for
Treating Pts Infected With HIV
Hwang C, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUAB0106LB.
HIV, subtype B–infected
PI- and MI-naive pts
with HIV-1 RNA
≥ 5000 c/mL and
CD4+ cell count
≥ 200 cells/mm3
(N = 28)
BMS-955176 40 mg QD + ATV 300 mg QD
+ RTV 100 mg QD
(n = 8)
BMS-955176 40 mg QD + ATV 400 mg QD
(n = 8)
BMS-955176 80 mg QD + ATV 400 mg QD
(n = 8)
Day 28*
*Followed through Day 42.
BMS-955176 prevents viral maturation by inhibiting cleavage between p24 and Gag SP1.
ATV 300 mg QD + RTV 100 mg QD
+ TDF 300 mg QD/FTC 200 mg QD
(n = 4)
Max. Median Decline
in HIV-1 RNA through
Day 42 (log10 c/mL)
-2.02
-1.86
-2.23
-2.39
No serious AEs or discontinuations for AEs
– 1 grade 3/4 Tx-related AE in BMS-955176 80 mg + ATV 400 mg arm (transient neutropenia)
50. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Long-term BMD Changes in HIV-Infected,
ART-Treated Pts
Case-controlled, observational cohort study
Assessed HIV-positive pts who had baseline and follow-up DXA
measurements during the A5202/A5224s study and another
DXA measurement during ACTG A5318 trial (n = 97)
– A5224s study: treatment-naive pts randomized to ATV/RTV, EFV
+ TDF/FTC, or ABC/3TC
– Control cases derived from 2 cohorts comprising HIV-uninfected
individuals (n = 614)
Key baseline characteristics, HIV-infected pts
– Median cumulative TDF use: 5.8 yrs (range: 1.1-7.4)
– Median cumulative PI use: 3.7 yrs (range: 0-7.4)
Grant P, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPDB0103.
51. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Long-term BMD Changes in HIV-Infected,
ART-Treated Pts
0 to Wk 96: BMD loss at lumbar spine and hip significantly greater in HIV-infected vs
uninfected pts (P < .001)
– Multivariate analysis, HIV-infected pts: BMD loss associated with lower CD4+ cell count (lumbar
spine only), higher HIV-1 RNA, TDF use
Wk 96 to final: HIV infection associated with significantly greater BMD loss at lumbar spine
(P = .012) but not at hip (P = .99)
– Multivariate analysis, HIV-infected pts: BMD loss associated with total lean body mass
Grant P, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPDB0103. Reproduced with permission.
Change in Lumbar Spine
BMD by Serostatus
HIV-
HIV+
L1L4BMD
Change(%)
0
-2
-4
0 2448 96 144 192 360
Wks
Change in Total Hip BMD by Serostatus
HIV-
HIV+
TotalHipBMD
Change(%)
0
-4
-5
0 2448 96 144 192 360
Wks
-1
-2
-3
52. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
Randomized, controlled, open-label phase IV study
MIDAS: Metabolic Effects of Switching
From EFV/TDF/FTC to DRV/RTV
Hamzah L, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPDB0102.
Switch to DRV/RTV 800/100 mg QD
monotherapy
(n = 32)
HIV-infected
pts with
HIV-1 RNA
< 100 copies/mL
on EFV/TDF/FTC
> 6 mos
(N = 64*)
Continue EFV/TDF/FTC
(n = 32)
Wk 48
At baseline, the median time on EFV/TDF/FTC was 3.5
yrs (IQR: 2.5-3.9)
*70 pts were randomized; 64 were available for analysis.
53. clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Highlights of IAS 2015
MIDAS: Key Results
4 cases of virologic failure reported in DRV/RTV arm (12.5%)
– Virologic rebound (n = 3), CNS escape (n = 1)
No significant change in renal parameters
Hamzah L, et al. IAS 2015. Abstract TUPDB0102. Reproduced with permission.
DRV/RTV
EFV/TDF/FTC
P = .03
MeanChange,
TotalHipBMD(%)
Weeks
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
0 48
10.0
5.0
0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
MeanUnadjusted
DifferenceatWk48
25(OH)D 1,25(OH)2D
EFV/TDF/FTC
DRV/RTV
-3.5
-16.6
4.8
0.9
Change in Vitamin D
Parameters, Wk 48
54. Go Online for More CCO
Coverage of IAS 2015!
Capsule Summaries of all the key data
CME-certified text module with expert
faculty commentary on all the key studies
clinicaloptions.com/hiv
Editor's Notes
This slide lists the faculty who were involved in the production of these slides.
This slide lists the disclosure information of the faculty involved in the development of these slides.
ART, antiretroviral therapy.
ART, antiretroviral therapy.
ART, antiretroviral therapy; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DSMB, data and safety monitoring board.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOSY03.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOSY03.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; CVD, cardiovascular; PY, patient-years.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOSY03.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; PY, patient-years.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOSY03.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; PY, patient-years.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOSY03.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0101LB.aspx
FTC, emtricitabine; MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TGW, transgender women.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0305LB.aspx
MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TGW, transgender women
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0305LB.aspx
PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TFV, tenofovir diphosphate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0305LB.aspx
MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TGW, transgender women.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0306LB.aspx
FTC, emtricitabine; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TFV, tenofovir diphosphate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAC0306LB.aspx
DBS, dried blood spot; FTC, emtricitabine; MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; PY, patient-years; STD, sexually transmitted disease; TFV, tenofovir diphosphate; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TGW, transgender women.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAC0202.aspx
FTC, emtricitabine; MSM, men who have sex with men; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; PY, patient-years; TFV, tenofovir diphosphate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAC0204LB.aspx
DBS, dried blood spot; FTC, emtricitabine; MSM, men who have sex with men; TFV, tenofovir diphosphate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAC0204LB.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; IPT, isoniazid preventive therapy; TB, tuberculosis; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAB0205LB.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; IPT, isoniazid preventive therapy; TB, tuberculosis.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/MOAB0205LB.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; ATV, atazanavir; COBI, cobicistat; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; QD, once daily; RTV, ritonavir.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOLBPE08.aspx
AE, adverse event; ATV, atazanavir; BL, baseline; BMD, bone mineral density; COBI, cobicistat; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; RTV, ritonavir.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/MOLBPE08.aspx
ATV, atazanavir; ITT, intent-to-treat; NC = F, noncompleter = failure; QD, once daily; RTV, ritonavir.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0101.aspx
AUC, area under the concentration curve; ATV, atazanavir; NC = F, noncompleter = failure; PK, pharmacokinetic; RTV, ritonavir; USD, US dollars.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0101.aspx
ATV, atazanavir; COBI, cobicistat; EFV, efavirenz; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; RTV, ritonavir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; QD, once daily.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0102.aspx
ATV, atazanavir; COBI, cobicistat; EFV, efavirenz; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; NS, not significant; RTV, ritonavir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0102.aspx
BMD, bone mineral density; COBI, cobicistat; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0102.aspx
COBI, cobicistat; EFV, efavirenz; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; HBeAb, hepatitis B e antibody; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAb, hepatitis B surface antibody; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/WELBPE13.aspx
ABC, abacavir; ART, antiretroviral therapy; COBI, cobicistat; eGFRCG, estimated glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault formula; EVG, elvitegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0103.aspx
BMD, bone mineral density; eGFRCG, estimated glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault formula; eGFRCKD-EPI Cr, estimated glomerular filtration rate by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0103.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; DOR, doravirine; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; QD, once daily; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0104.aspx
AE, adverse event; CNS, central nervous system; DOR, doravirine; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; NC = F, noncompleter=failure; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0104.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; GT, genotype; HCV, hepatitis C virus; QD, once daily; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAB0206LB.aspx
AE, adverse event; ART, antiretroviral therapy; EBV, elbasvir; GT, genotype; GZR, grazoprevir; HCV, hepatitis C virus; RAV, resistance associated variant; SVR, sustained virologic response; Tx, treatment.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAB0206LB.aspx
GT, genotype; HCV, hepatitis C virus; LDV, ledipasvir; QD, once daily; SOF, sofosbuvir; SVR, sustained virologic response.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Other%20Highlights/Capsules/TUAB0202.aspx
3TC, lamivudine; ART, antiretroviral therapy; ddI, didanosine; LTFU, lost to follow-up; RTV, ritonavir; ZDV, zidovudine.
AE, adverse event; ATV, atazanavir; FTC, emtricitabine; MI, maturation inhibitor; p24, capsid protein p24; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; QD, once daily; RTV, ritonavir; SP1, spacer protein 1; Tx, treatment.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUAB0106LB.aspx
3TC, lamivudine; ABC, abacavir; ART, antiretroviral therapy; BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; ATV, atazanavir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; RTV, ritonavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUPDB0103.aspx
ART, antiretroviral therapy; BMD, bone mineral density.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUPDB0103.aspx
DRV, darunavir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; IQR, interquartile range; QD, once daily; RTV, ritonavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUPDB0102.aspx
BMD, bone mineral density; CNS, central nervous system; DRV, darunavir; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; RTV, ritonavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
For more information about this study, go to http://www.clinicaloptions.com/HIV/Conference%20Coverage/IAS%202015/Treatment/Capsules/TUPDB0102.aspx