The document raises several criticisms of the HS2 high-speed rail project in the UK. It argues that most of the jobs and economic benefits will go to London rather than other areas like the West Midlands. It also claims that alternatives proposed would meet travel demand at less cost and without requiring subsidies, and that much of HS2's claimed travel time savings assume people do not work on existing trains. The document questions whether HS2 is truly important for British businesses since so few responded to a national consultation.