SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
 Background
 Results and Analysis
› Data Acquisition
› Implementation
 Conclusions
 Recommendations
 Future of Project
 Formed in January through MDP
 Diagnose problem with noise levels
 7A/7B
 Goal: Reduce noise levels?
 Re-analyzed problem
 Link between rest and noise levels
 New Goal: Change perception of noise
 Worked with ISR to create survey
 Interviewed staff and patients
 Noise Inventory
 Collected and analyzed data
 Further research
 Determined short-/long-term changes
 Implemented short-term changes
 Interviewed patients
 Collected and analyzed results
Staff Sample Size: 35
Patient Sample Size: 33
Have worked in hospital setting for <
10 years
50%
Have been working at this particular
unit between 2 and 5 years
60%
Believe the loudest time of day is
6am-noon
57%
Believe alarms/medical equipment
impede a patients ability to rest
69%
Believe maintenance/doors impede
rest
67%
Length of stay of patients 33% have been
here over 1 week
Average hospital stay rating 4.59/5 (5 is the
best)
Overall stay rating a 5/5 64%
Believe they have perfect hearing 67%
Average room rating 2.4/5 (5 is loud)
Believe that the loudest time of day
is 6am-noon
52%
Close door/Curtain
39%
Explain about the
beds/unplug/switch
bed
22%
Gave complaint to
supervisors/head
nurse
12%
Ask people/staff to
quiet down
12%
No complaints
7%
Offer ear plugs
3%
Quiet the monitor
3%
Apologize
2%
Close/Modify doors
33%
Less talking of
staff/remind one
another
22%
New beds
14%
Quieter
machines/monitors
10%
Modify
walls/ceilings/floor to
break and absorb
the sounds
7%
Alter
Alarms
7%
No ideas
5%
Add white noise
2%
No complaints or
ideas/fine how it is
50%
Earplugs
13%
Cart maintenance
5%
Door
maintenance/oil
hinges
4%
All Private rooms
4%
Stop IVs from
beeping so easily or
when nothing is
wrong
4%
Discharge the
patient
4%
White noise/sound
machines
4%
Get quieter toilets
4%
Keep the door shut
4%
Have people just
be more aware
4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
 Phones
› Operational: Close doors, Designated Cell
Phone Areas (by elevators), Turn Down Volume
at Night/During Quiet Hours
› Design: Play White Noise through Headphones,
Sound Absorbent Ceiling/Wall Materials
 Beds
› Operational: Use different beds
› Design: Play White Noise through Headphones
 Doors
› Design: Change Latches, Play White Noise
through Headphones, Sound Absorbent
Ceiling/Wall Materials, Put Windows on Doors
 Maintenance
› Operational: Maintain Equipment (Wheels!), Dim
Lights During Night/Quiet Hours, Close Doors
› Design: Put “Shhhhh!” Signs on All Doors
 IV Alarms
› Design: Modify Notification Method, Play White
Noise through Headphones
 Uncategorized Noises
› Operational: Special Admittance Hours/Location,
Play Nature Sounds/Soothing Music
› Design: Install Fans to Mask Noise, Carpet Tube
Delivery Systems
 7A
› “Shhhhh” signs on doors to patient rooms, supply
closets, and bathrooms
 7B
› “Quiet Hour” from 1 – 2 pm
 Doors closed, lights dimmed, staff focus on being
quiet
› White noise machine trials in patient rooms
 Post-implementation surveys to administer
for 7A/7B
Patient Sample Size: 37
 Mention of morning as loudest time of day
increased
› Before: 31.25%
› After: 60%
 Mention of patients/families as noise
contributors decreased by 47%
› Before: 25%
› After: 13.3%
 Mention of hospital staff as noise contributors
decreased by 29%
› Before: 37.5%
› After: 26.7%
 Overall stay rating shows no major change
› 0 – 5; 5 is best
› Before: 4.41
› After: 4.07
 Noise in room shows no major change
› 0 – 5; 5 is loudest
› Before: 1.72
› After: 1.8
 Percentage of patients believing noisiness can
be changed decreased by 24%
› Before: 43.75%
› After: 33.33%
 Mention of alarms/medical equipment as
noise contributors increased by 49%
› Before: 31.25%
› After: 46.7%
 Mention of everyday noises as noise
contributors increased by 433%
› Before: 6.25%
› After: 33.33%
 Patients’ overall perception of alarms, beeps,
and IVs rolling through hall were more
negative (non-human-controlled)
 Patients’ overall perception of beds rolling
through hall, cabinets and doors closing,
pagers, phones, trash cans in hall, and floor
cleaner (human-controlled)
 Morning (6 am to 12 pm) is consistently perceived
as loudest time of day
 “Shhhhh” signs seem to have made visiting
families and hospital staff more aware of resting
environment
› Decrease in belief that noisiness can be improved
› Decrease in contributions from patients/families and
hospital staff to noise
› Decrease in perception of human-controlled noises
 Increase in contributions from alarms/medical
equipment and everyday noises to noise show
possible need for quiet hour and/or white noise
 Mention of morning as loudest time of day
increased
› Before: 43%
› After: 62.5%
 Mention of patients/families as noise
contributors increased by 25%
› Before: 10%
› After: 12.5%
 Mention of hospital staff as noise contributors
increased by 51%
› Before: 29%
› After: 43.75%
 Overall stay rating shows no major change
› 0 – 5; 5 is best
› Before: 4.45
› After: 4.1
 Noise in room shows minimal change
› 0 – 5; 5 is loudest
› Before: 1.9
› After: 2.47
 Percentage of patients believing noisiness can
be changed decreased by 22%
› Before: 48%
› After: 37.5%
 38% noticed quiet hours, and 83% of those
believed they had good impact
 Mention of alarms/medical equipment as
noise contributors increased by 150%
› Before: 10%
› After: 25%
 Mention of everyday noises as noise
contributors decreased by 61%
› Before: 48%
› After: 18.75%
 Placed white noise machine in middle of
patient room, unbeknownst to patient(s)
 Interviewed patient and asked if white noise
machine was noticed
 White noise machine removed from room
 Next day, if still present, comparison of sleep
from 1st to 2nd night
 Sample size very small
 Individual cases
 Case 1
› 1st night: Noticed machine, and said “I really
appreciate it…it drowns and mellows out
everything…5 on a scale of 0 to 5 of being good”
› 2nd night: Awake most of the night; noticed
hallway and people noise through walls
 Case 2
› 1st night: Noticed machine; said machine “works”
and he “loved the white noise machine” because
it “helped a lot” and was very upset about it being
moved
› 2nd night: Sleep was worse than 1st night; said
they should “put them in every room”
 Other cases either were not interviewed both
nights or did not notice the machine in the
room
 Morning (6 am to 12 pm) is consistently
perceived as loudest time of day
 Quiet hours seem to have reduced impact of
everyday noises on patients’ rest
 White noise machines seem to aid patients’
sleep
 Increase in contributions from patients/families
and hospital staff to noise show possible need
for “Shhhhh” signs
 Increase in contribution from alarms/medical
equipment to noise show possible need for
more white noise
 Continue quiet hour in 7A/7B
 Increase amount of white noise machines
available for patients to use
 Put up more “Shhhhh” signs to spread
awareness in 7A/7B
 4 new team members
 We will be moving to mentoring role
 Team will focus on 2 main projects
› Re-design of IV alarms by patient beds
› Implementation of pink noise in patient rooms
Hospital Noise Analysis Team - 12-5 Presentation

More Related Content

Similar to Hospital Noise Analysis Team - 12-5 Presentation

Audiolife Educational Seminar
Audiolife Educational SeminarAudiolife Educational Seminar
Audiolife Educational Seminar
tony935
 

Similar to Hospital Noise Analysis Team - 12-5 Presentation (20)

Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
 
universal newborn hearing screening.pptx
universal newborn hearing screening.pptxuniversal newborn hearing screening.pptx
universal newborn hearing screening.pptx
 
Voice change
Voice changeVoice change
Voice change
 
32. Meniere's Disease Investagations and treatment.pptx
32. Meniere's Disease Investagations and treatment.pptx32. Meniere's Disease Investagations and treatment.pptx
32. Meniere's Disease Investagations and treatment.pptx
 
HKMA Structured CME Programme with HKS&H Session 11 The Child is not Respondi...
HKMA Structured CME Programme with HKS&H Session 11 The Child is not Respondi...HKMA Structured CME Programme with HKS&H Session 11 The Child is not Respondi...
HKMA Structured CME Programme with HKS&H Session 11 The Child is not Respondi...
 
How to Improve Hearing Loss Problem Right Now - Better Hearing Centers
How to Improve Hearing Loss Problem Right Now - Better Hearing Centers How to Improve Hearing Loss Problem Right Now - Better Hearing Centers
How to Improve Hearing Loss Problem Right Now - Better Hearing Centers
 
Busting Myths about frequency lowering
Busting Myths about frequency lowering Busting Myths about frequency lowering
Busting Myths about frequency lowering
 
Noise pollution in dental office
Noise pollution in dental officeNoise pollution in dental office
Noise pollution in dental office
 
Hearing Tests for Children
Hearing Tests for ChildrenHearing Tests for Children
Hearing Tests for Children
 
rehabilitation of a deaf child (PGIMER CHANDIGARH)
rehabilitation of a deaf child (PGIMER CHANDIGARH)rehabilitation of a deaf child (PGIMER CHANDIGARH)
rehabilitation of a deaf child (PGIMER CHANDIGARH)
 
Cochlea implant candidacy
Cochlea implant candidacyCochlea implant candidacy
Cochlea implant candidacy
 
Hearing loss
Hearing lossHearing loss
Hearing loss
 
Session 2 7 - grøndal k - hearing test - seafarers ver2
Session 2 7  - grøndal k - hearing test - seafarers ver2Session 2 7  - grøndal k - hearing test - seafarers ver2
Session 2 7 - grøndal k - hearing test - seafarers ver2
 
Speech Technology and how it will Transform Medicine
Speech Technology and how it will Transform MedicineSpeech Technology and how it will Transform Medicine
Speech Technology and how it will Transform Medicine
 
Update on hearing loss & dementia by Dr. Ghassan Shahrour نقص السمع والخ...
Update  on hearing loss & dementia  by Dr. Ghassan Shahrour    نقص السمع والخ...Update  on hearing loss & dementia  by Dr. Ghassan Shahrour    نقص السمع والخ...
Update on hearing loss & dementia by Dr. Ghassan Shahrour نقص السمع والخ...
 
Audiolife Educational Seminar
Audiolife Educational SeminarAudiolife Educational Seminar
Audiolife Educational Seminar
 
FDA Regulations for Hearing Instrument Specialists
FDA Regulations for Hearing Instrument SpecialistsFDA Regulations for Hearing Instrument Specialists
FDA Regulations for Hearing Instrument Specialists
 
Theresa h
Theresa hTheresa h
Theresa h
 
HearingCoach brochure (English)
HearingCoach brochure (English)HearingCoach brochure (English)
HearingCoach brochure (English)
 
Cochlear implant (3)
Cochlear implant (3)Cochlear implant (3)
Cochlear implant (3)
 

Hospital Noise Analysis Team - 12-5 Presentation

  • 1.
  • 2.  Background  Results and Analysis › Data Acquisition › Implementation  Conclusions  Recommendations  Future of Project
  • 3.  Formed in January through MDP  Diagnose problem with noise levels  7A/7B  Goal: Reduce noise levels?  Re-analyzed problem  Link between rest and noise levels  New Goal: Change perception of noise
  • 4.  Worked with ISR to create survey  Interviewed staff and patients  Noise Inventory  Collected and analyzed data  Further research  Determined short-/long-term changes  Implemented short-term changes  Interviewed patients  Collected and analyzed results
  • 5. Staff Sample Size: 35 Patient Sample Size: 33
  • 6. Have worked in hospital setting for < 10 years 50% Have been working at this particular unit between 2 and 5 years 60% Believe the loudest time of day is 6am-noon 57% Believe alarms/medical equipment impede a patients ability to rest 69% Believe maintenance/doors impede rest 67%
  • 7. Length of stay of patients 33% have been here over 1 week Average hospital stay rating 4.59/5 (5 is the best) Overall stay rating a 5/5 64% Believe they have perfect hearing 67% Average room rating 2.4/5 (5 is loud) Believe that the loudest time of day is 6am-noon 52%
  • 8. Close door/Curtain 39% Explain about the beds/unplug/switch bed 22% Gave complaint to supervisors/head nurse 12% Ask people/staff to quiet down 12% No complaints 7% Offer ear plugs 3% Quiet the monitor 3% Apologize 2%
  • 9. Close/Modify doors 33% Less talking of staff/remind one another 22% New beds 14% Quieter machines/monitors 10% Modify walls/ceilings/floor to break and absorb the sounds 7% Alter Alarms 7% No ideas 5% Add white noise 2%
  • 10. No complaints or ideas/fine how it is 50% Earplugs 13% Cart maintenance 5% Door maintenance/oil hinges 4% All Private rooms 4% Stop IVs from beeping so easily or when nothing is wrong 4% Discharge the patient 4% White noise/sound machines 4% Get quieter toilets 4% Keep the door shut 4% Have people just be more aware 4%
  • 12.
  • 13.  Phones › Operational: Close doors, Designated Cell Phone Areas (by elevators), Turn Down Volume at Night/During Quiet Hours › Design: Play White Noise through Headphones, Sound Absorbent Ceiling/Wall Materials  Beds › Operational: Use different beds › Design: Play White Noise through Headphones
  • 14.  Doors › Design: Change Latches, Play White Noise through Headphones, Sound Absorbent Ceiling/Wall Materials, Put Windows on Doors  Maintenance › Operational: Maintain Equipment (Wheels!), Dim Lights During Night/Quiet Hours, Close Doors › Design: Put “Shhhhh!” Signs on All Doors
  • 15.  IV Alarms › Design: Modify Notification Method, Play White Noise through Headphones  Uncategorized Noises › Operational: Special Admittance Hours/Location, Play Nature Sounds/Soothing Music › Design: Install Fans to Mask Noise, Carpet Tube Delivery Systems
  • 16.  7A › “Shhhhh” signs on doors to patient rooms, supply closets, and bathrooms  7B › “Quiet Hour” from 1 – 2 pm  Doors closed, lights dimmed, staff focus on being quiet › White noise machine trials in patient rooms  Post-implementation surveys to administer for 7A/7B
  • 18.  Mention of morning as loudest time of day increased › Before: 31.25% › After: 60%  Mention of patients/families as noise contributors decreased by 47% › Before: 25% › After: 13.3%  Mention of hospital staff as noise contributors decreased by 29% › Before: 37.5% › After: 26.7%
  • 19.  Overall stay rating shows no major change › 0 – 5; 5 is best › Before: 4.41 › After: 4.07  Noise in room shows no major change › 0 – 5; 5 is loudest › Before: 1.72 › After: 1.8  Percentage of patients believing noisiness can be changed decreased by 24% › Before: 43.75% › After: 33.33%
  • 20.  Mention of alarms/medical equipment as noise contributors increased by 49% › Before: 31.25% › After: 46.7%  Mention of everyday noises as noise contributors increased by 433% › Before: 6.25% › After: 33.33%
  • 21.
  • 22.  Patients’ overall perception of alarms, beeps, and IVs rolling through hall were more negative (non-human-controlled)  Patients’ overall perception of beds rolling through hall, cabinets and doors closing, pagers, phones, trash cans in hall, and floor cleaner (human-controlled)
  • 23.  Morning (6 am to 12 pm) is consistently perceived as loudest time of day  “Shhhhh” signs seem to have made visiting families and hospital staff more aware of resting environment › Decrease in belief that noisiness can be improved › Decrease in contributions from patients/families and hospital staff to noise › Decrease in perception of human-controlled noises  Increase in contributions from alarms/medical equipment and everyday noises to noise show possible need for quiet hour and/or white noise
  • 24.  Mention of morning as loudest time of day increased › Before: 43% › After: 62.5%  Mention of patients/families as noise contributors increased by 25% › Before: 10% › After: 12.5%  Mention of hospital staff as noise contributors increased by 51% › Before: 29% › After: 43.75%
  • 25.  Overall stay rating shows no major change › 0 – 5; 5 is best › Before: 4.45 › After: 4.1  Noise in room shows minimal change › 0 – 5; 5 is loudest › Before: 1.9 › After: 2.47  Percentage of patients believing noisiness can be changed decreased by 22% › Before: 48% › After: 37.5%
  • 26.  38% noticed quiet hours, and 83% of those believed they had good impact  Mention of alarms/medical equipment as noise contributors increased by 150% › Before: 10% › After: 25%  Mention of everyday noises as noise contributors decreased by 61% › Before: 48% › After: 18.75%
  • 27.  Placed white noise machine in middle of patient room, unbeknownst to patient(s)  Interviewed patient and asked if white noise machine was noticed  White noise machine removed from room  Next day, if still present, comparison of sleep from 1st to 2nd night
  • 28.  Sample size very small  Individual cases  Case 1 › 1st night: Noticed machine, and said “I really appreciate it…it drowns and mellows out everything…5 on a scale of 0 to 5 of being good” › 2nd night: Awake most of the night; noticed hallway and people noise through walls
  • 29.  Case 2 › 1st night: Noticed machine; said machine “works” and he “loved the white noise machine” because it “helped a lot” and was very upset about it being moved › 2nd night: Sleep was worse than 1st night; said they should “put them in every room”  Other cases either were not interviewed both nights or did not notice the machine in the room
  • 30.  Morning (6 am to 12 pm) is consistently perceived as loudest time of day  Quiet hours seem to have reduced impact of everyday noises on patients’ rest  White noise machines seem to aid patients’ sleep  Increase in contributions from patients/families and hospital staff to noise show possible need for “Shhhhh” signs  Increase in contribution from alarms/medical equipment to noise show possible need for more white noise
  • 31.  Continue quiet hour in 7A/7B  Increase amount of white noise machines available for patients to use  Put up more “Shhhhh” signs to spread awareness in 7A/7B
  • 32.  4 new team members  We will be moving to mentoring role  Team will focus on 2 main projects › Re-design of IV alarms by patient beds › Implementation of pink noise in patient rooms