The petitioner, a lawyer, has filed a writ petition in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on behalf of Sudha Bharadwaj, who has been detained by the Maharashtra Police. The petition alleges that Bharadwaj's detention and arrest are illegal and violate her fundamental rights. It seeks orders for her immediate release, appointment of a commission to investigate, and a stay on her remand order. The petition states that Bharadwaj has been detained without cause and questions the legality of the police action. Interim relief is sought for her to be placed under house arrest during the hearing of the petition.
Reference Against Justice Mansoor Ali ShahZaheer Abbas
Reference Against Justice Mansoor Ali Shah
COMPLAINT REGARDING ALLEGED MISCONDUCT OF HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUDGE, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE FOR ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 209 OF THE CONSTITUTION READ WITH CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND THE HIGH COURTS AND THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL PROCEDURE OF INQUIRY, 2005
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is the procedural law providing the machinery for punishment of offenders under substantive criminal law.
The code contains elaborate details about the procedure to be followed in every investigation, inquiry and trial, for every offence under the IPC or any other law.
Reference Against Justice Mansoor Ali ShahZaheer Abbas
Reference Against Justice Mansoor Ali Shah
COMPLAINT REGARDING ALLEGED MISCONDUCT OF HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUDGE, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE FOR ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 209 OF THE CONSTITUTION READ WITH CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND THE HIGH COURTS AND THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COUNCIL PROCEDURE OF INQUIRY, 2005
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is the procedural law providing the machinery for punishment of offenders under substantive criminal law.
The code contains elaborate details about the procedure to be followed in every investigation, inquiry and trial, for every offence under the IPC or any other law.
Points to be kept in mind while deciding sessions trialLegal
This document might provide some help to those who are dealing with Sessions Trial in Indian Courts. All care is taken to cover all points but if you find some mistake or some addition or deletion is required to me made, please inform me by e-mail:- hanifkaiz@yahoo.in
LLB LAW NOTES ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
LAW 3rd Sem
Rajendra V Pai vs Alex Fernandes AIR 2002 SC 1808
In re; A an Advocate AIR 1962 SC 1337
In re; Mr G a Senior Advocate of SC AIR 1954 SC 557
In re; Lalit Mohan Das AIR 1957 SC 250
Sheo Narayan Jafa v Judge Allahabad H.C. AIR 1953 SC 368
P J ratnam Vs D kanik Ran AIR 1964 SC 244
In re; M an Advocate AIR 1957 SC 149
John D'Souza vs Edward Ani 1994 (2) SCC 64
In re: V C Mishra AIR 1995 SC 2348
L D Jaisingham Vs Narain Das N Punjabi 1976 (1) ACC 354
Points to be kept in mind while deciding sessions trialLegal
This document might provide some help to those who are dealing with Sessions Trial in Indian Courts. All care is taken to cover all points but if you find some mistake or some addition or deletion is required to me made, please inform me by e-mail:- hanifkaiz@yahoo.in
LLB LAW NOTES ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
LAW 3rd Sem
Rajendra V Pai vs Alex Fernandes AIR 2002 SC 1808
In re; A an Advocate AIR 1962 SC 1337
In re; Mr G a Senior Advocate of SC AIR 1954 SC 557
In re; Lalit Mohan Das AIR 1957 SC 250
Sheo Narayan Jafa v Judge Allahabad H.C. AIR 1953 SC 368
P J ratnam Vs D kanik Ran AIR 1964 SC 244
In re; M an Advocate AIR 1957 SC 149
John D'Souza vs Edward Ani 1994 (2) SCC 64
In re: V C Mishra AIR 1995 SC 2348
L D Jaisingham Vs Narain Das N Punjabi 1976 (1) ACC 354
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
1. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.701of 2018
ANKIT GREWAL, ADVOCATE AS A NEXT BEST FRIEND OF ADVOCATE SUDHA
BHARADWAJ (DETENUE)
…Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA and Others
…Respondents
I N D E X
Sr.
No.
Particulars Dates Pages Court
Fee
1. Urgent Form 28.08.2018
2. Memo of parties 28.08.2018
3. Criminal Writ Petition 28.08.2018
5. ANNEXURES
6. P-1 (DOCUMENT
SUPPLIED BY THE POLICE)
7. P-2 COPY OF PETITION
FILED BEFORE HON.
DELHI HIGH COURT IN
WP (CRI) 2559 OF 2018
8. Power of Attorney -
NOTE:-
Total Court Fee Rs.___________
The main law points canvassed in this writ petition are mentioned at
Page in Para thereto.
2. 1
.
Relevant Rules/Statute: Constitution of India,
2
.
Any other Case: NIL
Any Caveat Petition: No
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 28/08/2018
(ARJUN SHEORAN) (NEHA SONAWANE)
P/867/2011 MAH/5843/2011
ADVOCATES
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
M:9592771330/9855686442
office@vaakyalegal.com
3. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No._______ of 2018
ANKIT GREWAL, ADVOCATE AS A NEXT BEST FRIEND OF ADVOCATE SUDHA
BHARADWAJ (DETENUE)
…Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA and Others
…Respondents
Total Court Fee Rs.___________
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 28/08/2018
(RS BAINS) (ARJUN SHEORAN) (NEHA SONAWANE)
P/867/2011 MAH/5843/2011
ADVOCATES
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
M:9592771330/9855686442
office@vaakyalegal.com
4.
5. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No._______ of 2018
MEMO OF PARTIES
CRWP No._______ of 2018
ANKIT GREWAL, ADVOCATE AS A NEXT BEST FRIEND OF ADVOCATE SUDHA
BHARADWAJ (DETENUE)
Aged 28 years, s/o Jitender Singh, r/o 1474, Sector 20 B, Chandigarh
VERSUS
1.STATE OF HARYANA
2.POLICE STATION, SURAJKUND THROUGH ITS SHO
3.MAHARASHTRA POLICE
THROUGH THE RESIDENT COMMISSIONER MAHARASHTRA
4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HARYANA, POLICE HQ,
PANCHKULA
RESPONDENTS
…Respondents
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 28/08/2018
(RS BAINS) (ARJUN SHEORAN) (NEHA SONAWANE)
P/867/2011 MAH/5843/2011
ADVOCATES
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
M:9592771330/9855686442
office@vaakyalegal.com
6.
7.
8. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
WRIT OR ORDER ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE
NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO
IMMEDIATELY SET THE DETENUE AT LIBERTY;
ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE DETENUES NOT TO ARREST THE
DETENUE WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE ENABLING HIM TO SEEK
APPROPRIATE REMEDIES
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PRESENT THE DETENUE
BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AND/OR SET HER FREE;
AND
ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF
HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS,
INCLUDING DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, FARIDABAD, TO LOCATE
THE DETENUE AND SET HER FREE FROM THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY
;
AND
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR ANY
OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER TO KINDLY ENSURE THE
RELEASE OF THE DETENUE I.E. THE PRESENT PETITIONER FROM
THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE OR FROM
THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY FROM ANY OTHER PERSON
AND
9. ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION
APPOINTING AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION/LOCAL
COMMISSIONER(S) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA READ WITH ORDER 26 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE,
1908;
AND
AND
IT IS FURTHER PRAYED THAT WRIT PETITION MAY KINDLY BE
ALLOWED.
AND
ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR DIRECTION WHICH THIS
HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS
AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE MAY KINDLY BE PASSED.
AND
DISPENSE WITH THE FILING OF CERTIFIED/LEGIBLE
COPIES/FAIR/UNMARKED/PROPER LEFT HAND SPACE/DOUBLE
SPACE/VERNACULAR COPIES OF ANNEXURES;
AND
DISPENSE WITH THE SERVICE OF ADVANCE NOTICES TO THE
RESPONDENTS;
AND
DISPENSE WITH THE VAKALATNAMA AND AFFIDAVITS TO BE
FILED WITH THE PETITION ;
10. INTERIM PRAYER
DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE PRESENT PETITION, THE
REMAND ORDER OF THE DETENUE MAY KINDLY BE STAYED AND
SHE MAY BE ALLOWED TO STAY AT HER HOUSE UNDER POLICE
SUPERVISION
11. RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the Petitioner is a citizen of India and, is entitled to invoke the extra-
ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
2. That the petitioner is an Advocate practicing in the High Court of Punjab and
Haryana.
3. The detenue is a citizen of India and a Advocate, human rights activist and a
Visiting Faculty at the National Law University, Delhi. She is the National
Vice President of the Peoples Union for Civil Liberties. The detenue has been
a member of several committees and has been internationally recognized for
her contributions to the cause of the marginal and downtrodden section of the
society. She is outspoken with regards to her views regarding the actions of
the present government and has articulated the same multiple public and
social media platforms.
4. In what appears to be a witch hunt for unsympathetic political views the
Maharashtra Police Officials came early morning on 28th August 2018 to her
home at Badarpur border in State of Haryana under the jurisdiction of P.S
Surajkund where she is staying with her daughter.
5. That the documents given to the detenue are in Marathi language which is not
known to the Detenue. There is no compliance with the requirements of
Sections 165 and 166 CrPC inasmuch as the documents are in Marathi, a
language which the detenue does not know, thus are unable to read its
contents. Furthermore, neither the grounds nor the purpose of conducting the
search, supposed to be made in writing by the searching officer in terms of
Section 165(1) have been made available to the Detenue and the remaining
occupants of the premises under search, after a copy thereof has been
12. forwarded to the nearest magistrate. A true copy of the documents supplied by
the Respondent police is annexed herewith as Annexure P-1.
6. An FIR No.4/2018 P.S. Vishrambagh Pune has been shown to the detenue
regarding a cultural program held on 31/12/2017, mentioning Sections
153A,505, 117 read with S.34 IPC. The same does not even contain the
detenue’s name, rightly so because she was not even present at this cultural
meeting. The detenue was not even present at the meeting. Furthermore, the
officers conducting the search seem to have, at their own behest, added certain
provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 in the search
warrant. Notably, Sections 13 and 18 of the UAPA have been added. It is
therefore possible that the officers conducting the search have added these
provisions purely for the purpose of preventing any application for
anticipatory bail. Hence, this Writ Petition as any form of detention without
any probable cause or reasonable grounds would amount to illegal/preventive
detention.
7. The search has not yielded any objectionable material, yet the detenue, who
has been detained and kept under preventive custody and has been arrested.
In fact, they have effectively detained her and restricted her movements to the
extent of not allowing her to even use her phone. The occupants of the house
have been forced to switch off their phones, in flagrant violation of
Constitutional, Fundamental and Human Rights, as well as established
principles and protocol of search and seizure.
8. The designation of the officers conduct the search is not being informed to the
detenue.
13. 9. That it is pertinent to mention that another activist, namely Sh. Gautam
Navlakha was illegally detained in New Delhi in the same matter. A habeas
corpus petition was filed on his behalf before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court,
vide WP (Cri) 2559 of 2018 and vide an order dated 28/08/2018 passed by the
Division Bench of Justice S. Murlidhar and Vinod Gupta, the remand order
passed by the jurisdictional court was stayed till tomorrow. A copy of the
petition filed in Delhi is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE P-2. The Hon’ble
Court has allowed Sh. Navlakha to stay at his house till then under house
arrest and will be hearing the petition tomorrow.
10. This is clearly an assault on liberals, liberal thinking and a motivated act.
There is no ground for detention or restriction of movement. The actions are
illegal and unconstitutional. Yet the detenue has extended all possible
cooperation to the searching officers, even in these circumstances.
11. The detenue is entitled to a protection of his life and liberty by an appropriate
Writ/order or direction by this court.
.
GROUNDS
12. That aggrieved by the aforesaid illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional conduct
and action of the Respondents, the present writ is being preferred before
the Hon'ble court inter-alia, upon the following grounds:
A. BECAUSE the detenue has been illegally detained and not in
accordance with law.
14. B. BECAUSE the actions of the respondents have been arbitrary, illegal
and unjust;
C. BECAUSE the actions of the respondents infringe the detenue’s right
to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India;
D. BECAUSE the actions of the respondents infringe the detenue’s right
to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India;
E. BECAUSE grave and manifest injustices have been done to the
petitioner and thus infringe upon his fundamental rights under Article
14 and 21 of the Constitution.
F. The petitioner seeks leave to urge any other Grounds at the time of
hearing of the present matter.
QUESTIONS OF LAW
13. That the following questions of law arise in this writ petition for the kind
consideration of this Hon'ble Court:
I. Whether the actions of the respondents have been arbitrary, illegal and
unjust?
II. Whether the actions of the respondents infringe the detenue’s right to
life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India?
III. Whether grave and manifest injustices have been done to the detenue
and thus infringe upon his fundamental rights under Article 14 and 21
of the Constitution?
IV. Whether the actions of the respondents infringe the detenue’s right to
life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India?
15. V. Whether grave manifest injustices have been done to the petitioner?
14. That the petitioner has been left with no other alternative remedy of
appeal/revision except to approach this Hon’ble Court by way of filing the
present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.
15. That the petitioner is not in immediate possession of certified/legible
copies/fair/unmarked/proper left hand space/double space copies of
Annexures annexed with the instant petition. However, true typed copies
and clear/legible photocopies of the same are being annexed with the
present petition for the kind consideration of this Hon’ble Court.
Therefore, filing of certified/legible copies of Annexures annexed with the
instant petition may kindly be dispensed with and true typed copies
thereof may kindly be taken on record, in the interest of justice, equity and
fair play.
16. That the petitioner has not filed any such or similar petition in this
Hon’ble Court or in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
PRAYER
The petitioner humbly prays for the following reliefs:
I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the
respondents to immediately set the detenue at liberty;
II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the
detenues not to arrest the detenue without prior notice enabling him to seek
appropriate remedies
III. ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR ANY OTHER
APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO PRESENT THE
DETENUE BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AND/OR SET THEM FREE;
IV. ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS
DIRECTING THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS, INCLUDING DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
16. FARIDABAD, TO LOCATE THE DETENUE AND SET HER FREE FROM THE ILLEGAL
CUSTODY ;
V. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS AND/OR ANY OTHER
APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER TO KINDLY ENSURE THE RELEASE OF THE
DETENUE I.E. THE PRESENT PETITIONER FROM THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY OF THE
RESPONDENT POLICE OR FROM THE ILLEGAL CUSTODY FROM ANY OTHER
PERSON
VI. ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION APPOINTING AN
INDEPENDENT COMMISSION/LOCAL COMMISSIONER(S) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ORDER 26 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE
CODE, 1908;
VII.IT IS FURTHER PRAYED THAT WRIT PETITION MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED.
VIII. ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR DIRECTION WHICH THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY
DEEMS FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE MAY
KINDLY BE PASSED.
IX. DISPENSE WITH THE FILING OF CERTIFIED/LEGIBLE
COPIES/FAIR/UNMARKED/PROPER LEFT HAND SPACE/DOUBLE SPACE
COPIES/VERNACULAR OF ANNEXURES;
X. DISPENSE WITH THE SERVICE OF ADVANCE NOTICES TO THE RESPONDENTS;
INTERIM PRAYER
DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE PRESENT PETITION, THE REMAND ORDER OF THE
DETENUE MAY KINDLY BE STAYED AND SHE MAY BE ALLOWED TO STAY AT HER
HOUSE UNDER POLICE SUPERVISION
17. CHANDIGARH
DATED: 28/08/2018
(RS BAINS) (ARJUN SHEORAN) (NEHA SONAWANE)
P/867/2011 MAH/5843/2011
ADVOCATES
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
M:9592771330/9855686442
office@vaakyalegal.com
18.
19. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No._______ of 2018
ANKIT GREWAL, ADVOCATE AS A NEXT BEST FRIEND OF ADVOCATE SUDHA
BHARADWAJ (DETENUE)
…Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA and Others
…Respondents
AFFIDAVIT OF ANKIT GREWAL, ADVOCATE, aged 28 years, s/o
Jitender Singh, r/o 1474, Sector 20 B, Chandigarh
I, the above named deponents do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-
1. That the deponent is fully conversant with the facts of the case, as such I am competent
to swear this affidavit. That the deponent has read and understood the contents of the
said writ petition alongwith the prayer and the grounds and facts stated in the body of
the petition and deponent believe that all the facts stated in the petition are true &
correct and the petition is being filed in this Hon'ble Court with the knowledge and
belief of the deponent. That the annexures filed alongwith the civil writ petition are
true copies/ true typed/fair copies of their respective originals.
2. That the deponent has not filed any such or similar writ petition either in this Hon'ble
Court or in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated:
Verification:-
Verified that the contents in para No.1 & 2 is true and correct to my knowledge. No part
of it is false and nothing has been kept concealed therein.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: